IPS-English VENEZUELA: Opportunity for Dialogue Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:50:02 -0800 Humberto Márquez CARACAS, Dec 12 (IPS) - This is a good time, in the wake of the defeat of President Hugo Chávez's proposed constitutional reform, to hold talks on the promotion of human rights, says the local non-governmental organisation PROVEA. ”The time is right for a dialogue panel to review, discuss and design policies, based on a broad consensus, to tackle around a dozen issues from a human rights perspective,” Marino Alvarado, the head of the Venezuelan Programme of Education and Action in Human Rights (PROVEA), told IPS. These issues include Venezuela's high crime rates and the appalling situation in the country's prisons -- longstanding problems that Chávez has failed to effectively address. The activist also called for an evaluation of the government's numerous ”missions”, the name given to the social programmes that include literacy training, primary health care provided by Cuban doctors in the slums, food for the poor at subsidised prices, soup kitchens for low-income women and children, free eye operations, dental care, microbusiness loans, support for cooperatives, scholarships at all educational levels, and stipends for the unemployed who agree to take training courses. This broad range of social programmes, funded by windfall oil profits, as well as the strong economic growth seen over the last few years, has consolidated support for Chávez among lower income sectors. In this highly polarised country, the virulently anti-Chávez opposition is basically middle and upper class. Opinion polls and around a dozen elections held since the president first took office in 1999 show that support for the left-wing leader has held steady at around 60 to 65 percent for nearly a decade. However, his proposed constitutional reforms, which would have made it possible for presidents to stand indefinitely for re-election, while making it easier for him to move the country towards ”21st century socialism”, were defeated narrowly in a Dec. 2 referendum -- Chávez's first electoral defeat. Calls for reflection, dialogue and reconciliation have increased since the referendum, in which 4.5 million Venezuelans (50.65 percent) voted against it, compared to 4.4 million (49.34 percent) who were in favour of the reforms. Abstention stood at 43 percent. After the referendum, Chávez conceded defeat, but said he would ”continue the struggle to build socialism.” ”For now, we couldn't do it,” he said, but added that he would not withdraw ”even one comma of this proposal,” which he said ”is still alive.” But José Vicente Rangel, who served as his vice president for five years, said that ”Chávez, like the opposition, must reflect on the message expressed by voters in two similarly sized blocs.” Rangel said ”dialogue is the mandate that emerged from the Dec. 2 voteàI am convinced that this is what the majority of the people want.” The dialogue should not be aimed at ”the disappearance of contradictions, debate and differences -- which form part of the essence of politics -- but at assuming them in a civic manner and without being motivated by the desire to destroy one's adversary,” said Rangel. Culture Minister Francisco Sesto, on the other hand, said that ”as a citizen committed to a collective project, I am not going to reconcile with anyone, nor do I know how to do so, or understand very well what that means.” ”We are not going to back off in the least. Instead, we will speed things up. As far as possible, we will move ahead full steam. This is the train of humanism,” said the minister. Both the pro- and anti-Chávez political parties have started to carry out their own separate analyses of what happened and of the political outlook. The United Socialist Party of Venezuela, in which Chávez is attempting to bring together all of his followers, has begun to hold grassroots meetings while its leaders are maintaining a prudent silence. For their part, the Communist Party and the Fatherland For All (PPT) party, which are governments allies, will set up ”socialist dialogue panels” to analyse the defeat of the constitutional reforms. ”The electoral setback is an alert that cannot be ignored,” said parliamentary Deputy José Albornoz, secretary-general of the PPT. The opposition, meanwhile, are meeting to ”keep up our guard in the face of Chávez's desire to push through the reforms in another format,” said Henry Ramos, the head of Democratic Action, one of the main opposition parties. Omar Barboza, president of the Un Nuevo Tiempo opposition party, pointed to ”a climate of reconciliation.” ”Whether or not the president accepts it, we are sure that even the democratic Chavistas will accompany us,” he said. Sociologist Maryclen Stelling said ”there will be no reconciliation, because when you are fighting against an enemy and you want to destroy him in order to impose your own vision, you refuse to acknowledge anyone else.” ”No reconciliation is currently possible,” said Stelling, a Chávez supporter. ”The only possibility is to identify concrete aspects involving daily life in which it is possible to work together.” Alvarado proposed ”starting out with the day-to-day issue that affects Venezuelans the most, the most pressing problem mentioned by 70 or 80 percent of the population in opinion polls: the high crime rates.” Last year, 12,257 murders were committed in this country of 27.5 million, equivalent to 45 per 100,000 population, and ”23 percent more than in 2005, which means the upward tendency remains steady,” said Alvarado. That makes Venezuela's homicide rate one of the highest in the region. Last year, a commission made up of representatives of public bodies and non-governmental organisations drafted recommendations for an overhaul of the country's police forces, based on an in-depth study of the existing problems. But the recommendations have been practically shelved since a new interior minister was named in January, said Alvarado. Another issue is the question of an amnesty for the members of the military and police forces and civilians who the opposition call ”political prisoners”. These people are under arrest in connection, for example, with the April 2002 coup in which Chávez was overthrown for two days. ”We have always been opposed to impunity,” said Alvarado. ”If someone should be investigated or tried or convicted, then that should happen.” ”But what we have also always demanded is legal guarantees and equal treatment, and that not only those on one side or another are tried and judged,” he added. The activist said that ”it is part of the political and democratic history of the country that after an election is held, agreements on amnesties are reached.” ”We will insist that the window open for dialogue on issues of concern to most Venezuelans should be taken advantage of, from a human rights perspective,” said Alvarado. ***** + PROVEA - in Spanish (http://www.derechos.org.ve) + VENEZUELA: Fighting Police Brutality (http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36326) (END/IPS/LA HD IP CS/TRASP-SW/HM/07) = 12130107 ORP002 NNNN