DemocracyNow!: Interview of Yemeni rendition victim Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:50:32 -0600 (CST) http://www.democracynow.org/2007/12/18/exclusive_yemeni_man_imprisoned_at_cia DemocracyNow! December 18, 2007 Yemeni Man Imprisoned at CIA "Black Sites" Tells His Story of Kidnapping and Torture Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, a victim of the CIA rendition program--kidnapped, held in secret jails, and tortured--speaks out in his first broadcast interview. In the fall of 2003, Bashmilah was detained in Jordan and turned over to the CIA. He was eventually flown to a secret prison he later found out was in Kabul, Afghanistan. In CIA custody, Mohamed says he was held in a freezing-cold cell, interrogated, shackled, force-fed and subjected to sleep deprivation and loud music for days. He attempted suicide at least three times. He talks about his interrogators and the American psychiatrists or psychologists who also played a role. Bashmilah has brought a lawsuit against Jeppesen Dataplan, a Boeing subsidiary, accused of abetting his kidnapping. In an in-depth and detailed interview from his home in Yemen, Bashmilah tell us his harrowing story. GUESTS: Meg Satterthwaite, Director of the International Human Rights Clinic at the New York University Law school. She is Mohamed Bashmilah's attorney. Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, a Yemeni man imprisoned in several CIA black sites. He was held for over a year and a half and was never charged. He is translated by Fuad Yahya. _________________________________________________________________ AMY GOODMAN: Today, a Democracy Now! broadcast exclusive. A victim of the CIA rendition program--kidnapped, held in secret jails and tortured--speaks out in his own words. His name is Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah, one of hundreds of men to have passed through the CIA's so-called "black sites." Today, he tells his story. A citizen of Yemen, Mohamed came to Jordan with his wife in the fall of 2003 to arrange surgery for his ailing mother. He was living in Indonesia at the time. Jordanian authorities took him into custody shortly after seizing his passport. There, he says he was tortured, threatened and forced to sign a false confession. He was turned over to the CIA within days and flown to a secret prison he later found out was in Kabul, Afghanistan. In CIA custody, Mohamed says he was held in a freezing-cold cell, interrogated, shackled, force-fed, subjected to sleep deprivation and loud music for days. He attempted suicide at least three times. He talks about his interrogators and the American psychiatrists or psychologists who also played a role. Mohamed has brought a lawsuit against a Boeing subsidiary accused of abetting his kidnapping. The American Civil Liberties Union is suing Jeppesen Dataplan on behalf of Mohamed and four other victims of CIA kidnapping and torture. The lawsuit accuses Jeppesen of providing direct logistical support for the CIA flights. Yesterday, I spoke to Mohamed Bashmilah on the phone from his home in Yemen, in his first broadcast interview. We're going to play that interview in a moment, but first I want to turn to Meg Satterthwaite. She is director of the International Human Rights Clinic at New York University Law School. She's Mohamed Bashmilah's attorney, joining us from Washington, D.C. Welcome to Democracy Now!, Meg Satterthwaite. MEG SATTERTHWAITE: Thank you very much. AMY GOODMAN: Talk about the significance of what Mohamed Bashmilah describes happened to him. MEG SATTERTHWAITE: So, one of the reasons that Mohamed Bashmilah's story is so important is that he is one of a very small number of individuals to have actually come out of the so-called "high-value detainee" program. This is a program that targeted individuals who were suspected of being quote/unquote "high-level al-Qaeda" members or had associations with such members. Mohamed is one of very few people who was later released from that program, rather than being sent to Guantanamo. And for that reason, he is able to tell about some of the black sites that, really, we haven't heard much about from any perspective outside of the US government perspective. AMY GOODMAN: He was never charged and then ultimately released, after being-- MEG SATTERTHWAITE: That's correct. AMY GOODMAN: --held in--the last jail was in Yemen for ten months, he says, at the behest of the Americans. MEG SATTERTHWAITE: Right. So he was never charged by the Americans in any way. In fact, he still doesn't know to this day why the Americans picked him up and why they requested his transfer from Jordan. He was charged finally by the Yemeni government. When he was transferred to Yemen, the Yemeni government has said that they were told to hold him on behalf of the US government. They later received a file from the US government, and essentially they felt that they didn't have any evidence that he was a terrorist, so they interviewed him and they found that he admitted to using a false identity document at one point when he was in Indonesia, and they charged him with forgery. They then sentenced him to time served, and they counted the time that he spent in secret prisons abroad. AMY GOODMAN: Meg Satterthwaite, why is he and the other men who you're representing suing this Boeing subsidiary, Jeppesen? MEG SATTERTHWAITE: So the Jeppesen suit, which was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, is a suit that challenges corporate complicity in the rendition and secret detention program. And the point here is to show and to try to stop the complicity of regular corporations in the secret detention and forced disappearance program. AMY GOODMAN: We're talking to Meg Satterthwaite, director of International Human Rights Clinic at New York University Law School. And what is the Boeing subsidiary's response--Jeppesen? MEG SATTERTHWAITE: Well, we actually haven't had a response from the defendant, Jeppesen, in this case. What has happened instead is that the US government has made a motion to intervene, and they've also at the same time made a motion to dismiss the lawsuit or to get a summary judgment granted in their favor on the basis of the state secrets doctrine. So the idea is the US government needs to come in and say, "Wait, we can't forward with this case. We can't even go forward to have a response from the defendant, because the issues in the case are so linked to national security that the entire case must be dismissed on the basis of state secrets." AMY GOODMAN: Meg Satterthwaite, we'd like you to stay with us. We're going to turn now to the interview that I did with Mohamed Bashmilah. Fuad Yahya provided the translation. I spoke to Mohamed at his home in Yemen. He began by talking about his initial capture in Jordan before he was turned over to the CIA. AMY GOODMAN: CIA torture and rendition victim, Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah. He was speaking to me yesterday from his home in Yemen. We'll come back to this interview in a moment. ....... I spoke to him at his home in Yemen late yesterday and asked him to talk about his transfer to CIA custody after his detention in Jordan. ##### <> ### AMY GOODMAN: Mohamed Bashmilah, he was a victim of CIA rendition, imprisoned at black sites run by the CIA. I spoke to him at his home in Yemen, telling his story for the first time in a broadcast interview. He was translated by Fuad Yahya. Mohamed Bashmilah's lawyer, Meg Satterthwaite, is still with us from Washington, D.C. You have brought a suit on his behalf. You are not, though, suing the US government. You are suing Jeppesen for being part of extraordinary rendition, is that right, Meg? MEG SATTERTHWAITE: That's right. First, I'd just like to clarify that the suit was actually brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, and I'm co-counsel in the case, representing Mohamed Bashmilah. The case is against Jeppesen Dataplan for its complicity and essentially for enabling some of the flights that were used to take individuals into the rendition and secret detention program. This is a program that could not exist without corporate complicity. Jeppesen is a crucial example here. The CIA used purportedly civilian planes to avoid certain procedures that they normally would need to use if they used, for example, military planes or official government planes. So the corporate complicity is actually a crucial part of the CIA program. AMY GOODMAN: And why not the US government, as well, a suit against the government? MEG SATTERTHWAITE: There has been, of course, several suits against the government for the rendition and secret detention program. The most recent one that viewers and listeners may be familiar with is the case of Khaled el-Masri, also a suit brought by the ACLU. In that suit, the suit was dismissed on the basis of the state secrets doctrine, essentially for the reason that--the CIA and the US government was able to forward the argument that the case was so sensitive it should be dismissed, because it had to do with state secrets. The point in this case is to say the government has already acknowledged the program's existence, the President and other high officials have given lots of details about the program when it suited them, so it can't be that the very basis and fact of the program is still a state secret. It cannot be that that is enough to get rid of a lawsuit about basic human rights and the violation of those basic human rights. AMY GOODMAN: Meg Satterthwaite, were the interrogations of Mohamed videotaped? MEG SATTERTHWAITE: We don't know. What we do know is that there were video cameras in his cells and also in interrogation rooms. I would like to know, of course, if my client was videotaped. We have filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking all records, which would include videotapes, if they existed, or transcripts. And all we've gotten from the CIA is the claim that they can neither confirm nor deny having any records of my client. AMY GOODMAN: Meg Satterthwaite, I want to thank you for being with us, director of the International Human Rights Clinic at New York University Law School. MEG SATTERTHWAITE: Thank you very much.