Calgary Sun: Nuclear power debate rages UPDATED: 2007-05-29 01:01:47 MST Energy Alberta brings alternative energy source to forefront By DINA O'MEARA, CP Nuclear power might be all the rage for some interested parties in Alberta's oilpatch, but others question the need for such controversial power generation in an industry that requires more steam than electricity. While the low-emission power generated from uranium poses an alternative to coal and costly natural gas, oil companies are already moving rapidly towards cheaper, more efficient technologies than those used for the past 20 years, one representative said. "Nuclear may be an option in five to 10 years from now, but in the meantime, people are already moving off of natural gas and moving on to other things," said Greg Stringham, with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. Nuclear power recently has garnered increased attention through the efforts of Energy Alberta Corp., which has been lobbying industry, government and the public in Alberta to raise awareness of its benefits for the province. The company, headed by Albertans Wayne Henuset and Hank Swartout, outgoing chief executive of Precision Drilling Trust, wants to invest $6.2 billion to build at least two nuclear reactors that would generate about 2,200 megawatts of electricity. The project has found supporters in a number of circles, including the University of Calgary's Institute for Sustainable Energy Environment and Economy, as an alternative to replace aging coal-fired plants which emit high levels of greenhouse gases. Opponents point out the heavily subsidized nature of nuclear power in Canada, primarily in Ontario and New Brunswick, and say the citizens of Alberta would be shouldering the costs. No oil company has publicly backed the project, including Shell Canada, which some media outlets claimed was studying the use of nuclear power in northern Alberta. Sure Northern Energy, a subsidiary of Shell, has parcels of land in an undeveloped area of the oilsands known to be in limestone. The unconventional play requires more study to learn about its geology, before hanging on any technology to produce it, spokesman Kurt Kadaz said. "That's why we are pursuing an appraisal program, and that's why it's too early to discuss the potential commercial project and any of its elements," Kadatz said. Energy Alberta, with partner Crown corporation Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., originally targeted the energy-hungry oilsands in its sales pitch, but has moved on to focus on Alberta in general. "The purpose of this plant is to produce electricity only," spokesman Guy Huntingford said. "Obviously, hydrogen and steam are byproducts of it, but that's not why it's being built; it's being built purely for electricity, so we can place the plant anywhere." Huntingford estimates the province will need about 11,000 new megawatts of power by 2020 to satisfy growing demands by the oilsands and possible oilsands refineries. Energy Alberta plans to file a preliminary application for the project with the federal Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in mid-June, and select a location for the proposed reactors by mid-September. Copyright © 2006, Canoe Inc. All rights reserved. [infowarsnews] Charlie Sheen Responds To New York Post Hit Piece Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 01:29:56 -0500 (CDT) Charlie Sheen Responds To New York Post Hit Piece Actor: "My views and convictions regarding 9/11 have not wavered" Charlie Sheen Prison Planet Monday, May 28, 2007 My views and convictions regarding the events of 9/11 have not wavered. I still firmly believe the citizens of this great country, especially the family members of those tragically lost, deserve a much more accurate and thorough investigation surrounding the horrific events. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/280507sheenresponds.htm ------------------------------------------------ Prison Planet.tv: The Premier Multimedia Subscription Package: Download and Share the Truth! [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of 280507sheen.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of 071106pptvbanner2.gif]