*****************************************************************
12/10/02 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 10.320
*****************************************************************
RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE
*****************************************************************
Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject
line and first line of body
NUCLEAR POLICY
1 China Vows to Press N. Korea on Nukes
2 Two US policies for 2 ?axis? states
3 Bush told to end nuclear double speak for India
4 UK power: energizing the nuclear option*
5 U.N. Arms Experts Step Up Iraq Inspections*
6 Iraq debate goes beyond facts
7 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites *
8 US: EchoStar, Hughes End Satellite Deal
9 U.S., N. Korea Disagree in Nuclear Talks
10 US: Expert sees future for nuclear power
NUCLEAR REACTORS
11 US: TXU, inspectors to discuss Comanche reactor problems
12 US: Problems keep reactor at nuclear power plant closed
13 US: 'Extraterrestrial alien' invades nuclear plant*
14 Bulgarian Power Plant?s Fate Hangs in the Balance
15 US: Comanche Peak nuclear plant still down
16 US: Calvert Cliffs FONSI
17 US: Nuclear Plant Equipment Problems Worsening as Reactors Age
18 US: TVA offers Net site for children --
NUCLEAR SAFETY
19 US: Schumer, Clinton ask NRC to look at security
20 US: Detecting smuggled nuclear material
21 Bosnian Bombing AFTEREFFECTS
22 PLAYING CATCH-UP (health impacts from Bosnia)
23 US: Fact-finding phase of probe into train tunnel fire nears end
24 US: Construction accident sparks radiation concern
25 The UN releases a study that lends credence to health experts? cries
NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE
26 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing
27 US: NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste to Meet December 17 - 19
28 Editorial: Whistleblower probe was full of problems
29 US: Radioactive truck returning to Twin Falls
30 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing*
31 Prejudice against nuclear reprocessing must go: Chidambaram
32 State records on LES recruitment sought *
33 US: *Borough Council unanimously opposes landfill?s radiation monito
NUCLEAR WEAPONS
34 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites
35 U.N. Teams Head Toward Iraq Uranium Mine
36 India to buy Russian submarines, a strategic bomber, and…
37 US: U.S. Sees Nuclear Deterrence Against WMD Attack*
38 Press freedom prize awarded to Russian reporter Grigory Pasko
39 Inspection teams in Iraq focus on 3 nuclear centers
US DEPT. OF ENERGY
40 Government asks for extension in whistleblower suit
41 DOE to settle partial debt in land deal
42 Bechtel Jacobs cites failed work planning in radioactive release
43 ?Culture of Theft? Reported at U.S. Nuclear Lab
44 LANL Memo Stirs Fear of Reprisals* *
45 Energy Secretary Points to Government/Industry Partnerships to
46 Los Alamos Memo to Employees Stirs Fear
47 DOE to reserve 3,200 acres for conservation
OTHER NUCLEAR
48 Portrait: Daniel Ellsberg
49 Iraq debate goes beyond facts
50 Judge Knocks GAO Out of Cheney Task Force Lawsuit
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
FULL NEWS STORIES
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
1 China Vows to Press N. Korea on Nukes
Las Vegas SUN:
December 09, 2002 By MATT KELLEY ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON- Chinese military officials, in their first high-level
discussions with the Pentagon in years, said Monday they would
try to pressure North Korea to drop its nuclear weapons programs,
U.S. officials said.
At the same time, the Chinese officials refused to rule out
military force over Taiwan.
Douglas Feith, the Pentagon's No. 3 official who headed the U.S.
delegation at Monday's meeting in Washington, said the talks were
useful and professional. Gen. Xiong Guangkai, deputy chief of the
general staff of China's People's Liberation Army, led the
delegation from Beijing.
"They were real discussions. They were not just stilted set
pieces," said Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy. "We
came away with some additional understanding of the personalities
on the other side and the ideas on the other side."
While lunching on salmon, Chinese officials also presented a
detailed proposal for military-to-military contacts with the
United States, Feith said. He said it was too soon to offer a
U.S. reactions to the proposals.
The Pentagon wants the exchanges to be more than just port calls
and photo opportunities, Feith said.
"If the exchanges are structured properly, they will serve our
interests, our common interests, providing insights, to reduce
the possibility of mistakes, of misunderstanding," Feith said.
The talks are the latest sign of warming in military relations
between the two countries. A low point was April 2001, when a
Chinese fighter jet collided with a U.S. Navy surveillance plane
over the South China Sea.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was angered by China's
accusation that the Navy's EP-3 surveillance violated Chinese
sovereignty by landing at a Chinese airfield after the aerial
collision. He also was unhappy that China detained the crew for
11 days and refused to let the United States repair and fly the
plane off the airfield. The Chinese fighter jet crashed in the
sea, killing the pilot.
But relations have improved since then, with U.S. Navy ships
resuming port calls in China last month and increasing contacts
among higher level officials.
The Chinese said they would try to persuade North Korea to
abandon its nuclear weapons program, Feith said. The Chinese also
insisted they no longer sell missile technology or equipment to
North Korea, Feith said.
"I don't know whether they're going to take concrete steps,"
Feith said, adding, "There is a common interest that exists
between China and the United States ... to stop the North Korean
nuclear program."
The United States has been consulting with China and other
countries in the region since Pyongyang's surprise admission in
October that it has a secret uranium enrichment program to make
nuclear weapons. Shipments of fuel oil to North Korea have ended.
Under a 1994 agreement, North Korea had promised to end its
nuclear weapons programs in exchange for two civilian nuclear
power plants and the fuel oil aid.
On Taiwan, the talks were not as harmonious. Feith said Pentagon
officials objected to China's buildup of missiles across the
Taiwan strait, while China responded with objections to U.S. arms
sales to Taiwan.
China and Taiwan split amid civil war in 1949, and China regards
Taiwan as a renegade province. The United States does not have
diplomatic ties with Taipei but is committed to defending the
island from Chinese attack.
In a biennial military report given to U.S. officials Monday,
China said "it will not foreswear the use of force" to reunite
Taiwan with the mainland.
"China's armed forces will unswervingly defend the country's
sovereignty and unity, and have the resolve as well as the
capability to check any separatist act," said the report, titled
"China's National Defense in 2002."
On the Net: CIA factbook on China:
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html
[http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html]
All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc.
*****************************************************************
2 Two US policies for 2 ?axis? states
Monday, December 09, 2002
Expressindia
Reuters
* Seoul, December 8 * US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard
Armitage?s today set out on a week-long tour of Asia for talks on
Iraq and North Korea, two of three countries US President George
W. Bush termed an ??axis of evil?? for suspicion of having
weapons of mass destruction. The tour underscores contrasting US
approaches towards Baghdad and Pyong Yang and their suspected
nuclear arsenals and other banned weapons.
Iraq?s declaration yesterday denying it has weapons of mass
destruction is being analysed by a sceptical Washington, which
has mustered an international coalition and vowed to force
Baghdad to disarm if UN inspectors fail to do so.
North Korea, which told the United States in October that it was
secretly processing uranium for arms, has defiantly asserted its
right to wield such weapons in the face of what it sees as
nuclear threats from the United States and it?s 37,000 troops in
South Korea. While the US-led pressure builds on Iraq, communist
North Korea has been given a fresh chance to meet international
demands that it abandon the uranium project, which violates key
international non-proliferation treaties.
Diplomatic sources said on Friday, the multinational organisation
in charge of energy projects in North Korea has postponed a
high-level meeting until January, delaying a joint decision on
it?s nuclear arms programme.
The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO), was
set up under a 1994 agreement which promised North Korea fuel oil
and nuclear power stations in return for a freeze on a
plutonium-based nuclear arms programme. KEDO suspended the oil
shipments last month, and the meeting of the allied group would
have discussed the future of two light-water reactors now under
construction in North Korea.
US officials say there will be no ??cookie-cutter approach?? to
states posing seemingly similar menaces. However, analysts view
North Korea?s geographic, political and military circumstances
quite different from those of Iraq.
© 2002: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights
*****************************************************************
3 Bush told to end nuclear double speak for India
IANS[ WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2002 02:50:14 AM ]
WASHINGTON: South Asia scholar Selig Harrison has taken up
cudgels against the Bush administration for treating India
unfairly in nuclear matters despite its record of honouring
international non-proliferation norms.
Urging the administration to give up its “obsolete policy that
bans US civilian nuclear co-operation with New Delhi,” he said
the time has now come to “end the nuclear double standard for
India”, especially because it has, unlike Pakistan, refused to
sell nuclear weapons know-how to any other state.
On the other hand, Pakistan has exported uranium enrichment
technology to North Korea in exchange for missiles, while India
has adopted an unflinching policy of not sharing its nuke
know-how with any other country, he said. “Despite India's
consistent record of honouring international non-proliferation
norms, the US clings to an increasingly obsolete policy that bans
US civilian nuclear co-operation with New Delhi.
“At the same time, Washington permits such co-operation with
China, even though Beijing has transferred nuclear and missile
technology to Pakistan and Iran,” Harrison said writing in the
commentary page of the Los Angeles Times on Monday.
Harrison said the ban is a relic of past decades when the US was
pressing India not to become a nuclear power. Now that New Delhi
and Islamabad have joined the nuclear club, Washington needs to
reshape its policies.
Strategically, Harrison said, US policy is now based on the
implicit premise that Asia is more stable with India having a
minimum nuclear deterrent than with China enjoying a nuclear
monopoly. “It no longer makes sense to refuse US co-operation
in making Indian civilian nuclear reactors safer and to bar US
companies from selling civilian reactors to India, as they do to
China.”
Harrison was a correspondent in New Delhi for several years. He
is currently a senior scholar of the Woodrow Wilson International
Centre for Scholars and director of the Asia programme at the
Centre for International Policy.
Another issue of concern about the Bush administration policy is
its refusal to help India ensure the safety of nuclear
installations, Harrison pointed out. Taking up the case for
India, he said that with 14 operating civilian nuclear reactors
that produce electricity, and more on the way, India is anxious
to avoid a nuclear disaster like the one at Chernobyl in Ukraine
and has periodically asked the US to help in this regard. Last
month, however, the Bush administration had opened the door
slightly for a possible policy reappraisal, according to
Harrison. — IANS
Richard Meserve, chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, will meet in January with Indian Atomic Energy
Commission chairman Anil Kakodkar.
The White House approved the visit to India after a bitter
interagency struggle in which NPT “strict constructionists”
tried to block the trip.
A compromise was finally reached by permitting Meserve to have a
“dialogue” but not to arrange actual transfers of nuclear
safety technology, Harrison revealed in his article entitled
“End the Nuclear Double Standard for India”.
India branded the NPT as discriminatory and refused to sign. Now
it wants to sign as a nuclear weapons state, but the US will not
agree.
The NPT does not bar its signatories from providing nuclear
technology to non-signatories. But the US Congress went beyond
the treaty with a law barring non-signatories from receiving US
nuclear technology even if they accepted International Atomic
Energy Agency safeguards on its use. This legislation
specifically bars the US from helping India make its reactors
safer.
To remedy matters, Harrison suggested that in return for access
to US civilian nuclear technology, the US should impose two
conditions, at minimum, on India.
“First,” he said, “New Delhi would have to accept the
international agency's safeguards not only on any new reactors
purchased but also on all its existing civilian nuclear reactors,
as it says it is ready to do.
“Secondly, India would have to make some form of binding
commitment not to export nuclear technology, formalising its de
facto policy.
“Thirdly, the administration should follow up the Meserve visit
with a co-operative nuclear safety programme as the prelude to a
broader dialogue designed to strengthen India's demonstrated
commitment to non-proliferation.”
Copyright ďż˝ 2002 Times Internet Limited.
*****************************************************************
4 UK power: energizing the nuclear option*
*The UK nuclear industry has been buoyed by recent government
comments.*
December 10, 2002 12:50 PM GMT (Datamonitor) - Comments from the
DTI have been seen as indicative of the government's support for
the nuclear option. In fact, it's difficult to see that the
government has much option - the cost of replacing the UK's
nuclear generation capacity would be massive, with intolerable
job losses and an over dependence on foreign gas. It's not great
news for the taxpayer but should provide hope for private
investors.
At an atomic energy conference last week, Joan MacNaughton, the
Director General of Energy at the Department of Trade and
Industry, insisted that British Energy's problems are not
symptomatic of wider problems in the UK nuclear industry. Her
comments are likely to pre-empt a favorable review of the nuclear
industry in the government's forthcoming energy white paper.
Nuclear energy accounts for around one quarter of existing power
generation capacity in the UK. It is not entirely surprising,
therefore, that the government seems determined to find a
solution to the continuing problems affecting companies in this
industry.
If the government were to sideline nuclear energy, it would first
need to replace a significant amount of the country's existing
generation capacity. While the private sector could be relied
upon to fulfill some of this responsibility, government
investment would have to be substantial.
In addition, by replacing nuclear capacity with other forms of
generation (mostly gas), the country may become overly dependent
on foreign sources of this fuel, possibly from Russia or Algeria.
This could lead to price instability and increase the UK's
economic vulnerability.
Finally, if the government were to give up its support for this
industry, the employment fallout would be substantial, not just
for power generators, but also nuclear reprocessers like BNFL.
While this would partly be offset by new-build gas generation, it
may not fully compensate for job losses in the nuclear sector.
Whether the course that the government takes is in the best
interests of the British taxpayer in the longer term is
questionable. However, this intimation of government support will
provide a much needed boost to private sector confidence in this
beleaguered segment.
You can download a FREE energy report at www.dmfreereports.com
*Datamonitor's Digests let you receive more comments like this
one, for free, direct to your inbox - and you also get a free
Datamonitor report when you sign up. Click here
for more information.*
(c) 2002 Datamonitor. All rights reserved. Republication or
© 2002 Datamonitor plc
*****************************************************************
5 U.N. Arms Experts Step Up Iraq Inspections*
/ Tue December 10, 2002 06:46 AM ET /
By Huda Majeed Saleh
AL-QAEM, Iraq (Reuters) - U.N. arms experts fanned out to inspect
several new sites across Iraq Tuesday in the largest one-day
operation since their hunt for alleged banned weapons resumed
last month.
A team of inspectors drove for five hours to examine a phosphate
facility near the Syrian border 400 km (250 miles) northwest of
Baghdad while other teams inspected four more suspected nuclear,
biological and chemical sites.
One team headed to an animals vaccine facility in the region of
Abu Ghouraib, west of Baghdad. A second group went to Al-Furat
Chemical Industries General Company, which is linked to the
Ministry of Industry and Minerals. The company site is 41 miles
south of Baghdad.
A fourth team visited Ibn al-Haitham research facility in
Wazireyah in a northern Baghdad suburb. A team later returned to
Tuweitha nuclear site, 12 miles, south of Baghdad, their fourth
inspection of the facility in one week.
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and
the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission
(UNMOVIC) have visited about 30 sites since their return to Iraq
last month after a four year gap.
Tuesday's operation covered the largest number of sites inspected
on the same day. The al-Qaem site is also the furthest the
inspectors had gone outside Baghdad.
The number of experts had doubled with the arrival Sunday of 25
inspectors. Teams will be further beefed up with the arrival of
around two dozen more experts later Tuesday.
The United States is pressing weapons inspectors to be more
aggressive in uncovering evidence of secret Iraqi arms.
Iraq says it gave a full account of any past and current programs
involving biological, chemical or nuclear weapons under a new
U.N. resolution which demands full Iraqi cooperation with the
weapons inspectors.
It has denied having any such weapons but the United States says
it has, and warned it is ready to take military action if
necessary to disarm Baghdad.
U.S. officials began analyzing a 12,000-page dossier detailing
Iraq's weapons programs Monday. The United States received an
early unedited copy of the Iraqi declaration after a deal was
struck to override a U.N. Security Council decision to keep the
report under wraps.
PURELY FOR CIVILIAN USE
At al-Qaem site, 11 inspectors in four-wheel-drive cars drove
into the facility, which is run by the Ministry of Industry and
Minerals, after the long journey from Baghdad.
Accompanied by Iraqi officials, they were allowed into the
guarded facility immediately. The site is located in a desert
area few hundred meters away from the border with Syria.
At al-Furat, a company official said after inspectors spent two
hours checking its facilities that products there were all purely
for civilian use. "We have nothing (banned) ... Everything was in
front of them and there is no banned substances," Wahhab Abdul
Wahhab told Reuters.
Official Iraqi newspapers launched Tuesday more verbal attacks on
the United States and Britain, accusing them of planning to
attack Iraq despite Baghdad's hand over of a "complete and
accurate" weapons declaration.
Al-Iraq daily said the United States wanted to sabotage any
attempts to reach a just solution for the issue of Iraq by
lifting the crippling U.N. sanctions, imposed on Iraq for its
1990 invasion of Kuwait.
"The clear truth is that Iraq has met its commitments and
continues to deal with the inspection teams," al-Iraq said.
"The report that it handed at the start of the week to the United
Nations was comprehensive and detailed all its (weapons)
programs," it said. "This is the true deed, not that croak of
ravens getting ready to attack and whose dirty media beat the
drums of war."
*****************************************************************
6 Iraq debate goes beyond facts
Eastside Journal Local News
2002-12-10 by Tom Wolfe
None of the important questions about Iraq can be answered with
facts.
But they are a starting point for thinking.
The Rev. Sharon Moe, senior pastor of the University Temple
United Methodist Church, brought an arsenal of handouts,
statistics, maps, color slides and personal observations to
Auburn United Methodist Church Sunday night, drawing on two
visits to Iraq this year, and a lifetime of asking big questions.
Her own views are fiercely anti-war, but she emphasizes personal
reflection over political ideology.
``My goal is to get people thinking,'' she explained later. ``I
am very careful to respect differences of opinion, and I try not
to put people on the spot.''
Even so, an evening of immersion in human catastrophe is an
ordeal. An estimated 500,000 Iraqi children have died from the
consequences of war -- famine, disease, pollution, birth defects
-- and thousands more are on the brink.
Moe wants people to think about that, and about depleted uranium,
leukemia, Gulf War syndrome, so-called collateral damage, our
dependency on oil, the cultural treasures of modern-day
Mesopotamia and the true meaning of patriotism.
At the same time Moe was speaking in Auburn, the Eastgate
Congregational United Church of Christ was hosting a community
forum in Bellevue. It lasted more than two hours.
I admire the 150 or so people who attended those sessions and
took up the challenge to learn more about Iraq.
It's a daunting task. And even when you know more, it's not
enough.
* We know that Saddam Hussein is a ruthless dictator. But we
don't know what level of threat he now poses outside his borders.
* We know that war is hell, but we don't know how many combatants
and civilians would die, how it would affect the economy or what
it would mean to history.
* We know we could conquer Iraq, but we don't know if that would
promote Mideast stability or provoke anti-American terrorism.
Our history with Iraq is also confusing.
Go back to Aug. 2, 1990, and we have the Iraqi invasion of
Kuwait, which started the current chain of events.
But go back just a few months more, and the picture changes. Go
back to January 1990, and you'll see President Bush signing a
presidential order promoting trade with Iraq. Go back to 1983 and
you'll see Donald Rumsfeld (now defense secretary; then a White
House envoy) shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, happy to have an
ally against fundamentalist Iran. You'll see Arkansas Gov. Bill
Clinton shaking hands with Iraqi Ambassador Nizar Hamdoon, happy
to be selling Arkansas-grown rice. Go back to 1981 and you'll see
the Reagan administration, happy with Iraq's invasion of Iran,
criticizing Israel for knocking out an Iraqi nuclear reactor.
Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator then, too, and working on
developing a nuclear bomb.
What do you think?
Not everyone can attend a two-hour forum on Iraq. If you'd like
to be part of the discussion, send an e-mail to
editorial.page@king countyjournal.com or send us a letter to the
editor.
We'll publish a selection of responses this weekend.
Tom Wolfe is editor of the Eastside Journal. His column runs
every Tuesday. Readers can reach him by phone 425-453-4230,
e-mail tom.wolfe@eastsidejournal.com or fax 425-635-0603.
Eastside Journal 1705 132nd Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005-2251
Phone: 425-455-2222 Fax: 425-635-0602
*****************************************************************
7 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites *
*December 10, 2002* News Content
TehranTimes Navigation
/*By Our Staff Writer */
THERAN -- A high-ranking Israeli officer threatened that the
Zionist regime would launch nuclear attack on Islamic holy sites
in the Middle East, an Israeli newspaper said Sunday.
In case Israel was attacked by states or groups, the Jewish state
would respond by dropping nuclear bombs on Islamic cities such as
Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia and Qom in Iran. The Haaretz
newspaper quoted an unidentified high-ranking officer a s saying.
It is an irony of our time Iraq has been suffering for a decade
because it is accused of having some capabilities of
unconventional weapons, while Israel announces that it possesses
nuclear weapons, but there is not any international action
against it.
The officer, a guide in the Israeli military academy, was quoted
as saying that Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear warheads
along with their delivery systems, including long-range ballistic
missiles, long-range bombers and nuclear submarines.
Indeed, while is Iraq under the pressure, Israel is the only
entity in the Middle East to possess a huge arsenal of weapons of
mass destruction, including a sizable nuclear arsenal.
It is unfortunate that the United States, Israel's main
protector, has always prevented any serious move to discuss
Israel's weapons of mass destruction. But at the same time it has
accused a number of other countries of trying to acquire weapons
of mass destruction. It has put them under pressure on the basis
of the very baseless accusations it has leveled against them.
It is time the Islamic world in the first place and the
international community too took serious action to contain
Israel. The Zionist regime is an occupationist, expansionist
entity. It must be contained, else the entire world will be in
danger.
*****************************************************************
8 EchoStar, Hughes End Satellite Deal
www.newsday.com
December 10, 2002
An unruly stampede can be readily predicted when President George
W. Bush seeks to fully exploit the victories that first gave him
control of the executive branch and now have given him possession
of Congress.
Peevish commentators will argue that he is master of the world
based on the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that effectively
awarded him the presidency in 2000. A single vote was all that
stood between Bush and illegitimacy and negated the nearly
600,000-vote plurality by which Albert Gore won the popular vote.
That was then. Now, the recent election results have provoked the
business community - and groups such as the National Association
of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - to wet their
pants in anticipation of the conservative agenda they are in
position to ram through.
First out of the gate is likely to be an energy policy that
should surprise no one who understands we have both a president
and a vice president who are oilmen. They might as well be
marinated in it.
But Bush will earn his pay threading his way through a minefield
of competing energy sources that include nuclear, oil, coal,
natural gas and even, I suppose, the idealistic wind and solar
enthusiasts who offer the best hope that the world will not be
choked with greenhouse gases.
The coal lobby already won a great victory when Bush took steps
to permit older coal-fired plants to escape the requirement that
they install costly anti-pollution devices.
The nuclear people have a claim to their day in court because the
new chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee is
Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), a vigorous proponent of nuclear
power. This could signal a new lease for an industry in danger of
withering to insignificance.
The nuclear lobby is demanding the industry be limited in its
liability from catastrophic accidents. This is in response to
fears that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as easily could have
involved airplanes crashing into nuclear power plants as into the
World Trade Center.
The environment is at once Bush's greatest liability and most
serious weakness. His oil background virtually guarantees this.
He will, of course, be under tremendous pressure to open up the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to rampant exploration. This
naturally will infuriate environmentalists. But Bush's other
environmental problems already are so numerous he may figure that
these lost votes are ones he simply will have to do without.
I guess he has made the judgment that people who get hysterical
about protecting the air and water, who want to hold on to
endangered species and spare useless wetlands from development,
are never going to be the kind of people he feels comfortable
with.
Meanwhile, timber interests are itching to have a go at more
extensive logging in the nation's national forests.
I suppose Bush's biggest problem will be just trying to listen to
forces that made this fall's midterm elections the most expensive
in history. Imagine the skills he'll need to avoid slighting
those who think they've bought a piece of him.
Copyright © 2002, Newsday, Inc.
*****************************************************************
9 U.S., N. Korea Disagree in Nuclear Talks
Tue Dec 10, 9:05 AM ET
By JAE-SUK YOO, Associated Press Writer
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage said Tuesday that Washington would seek a "diplomatic
solution" to North Korea, however, reiterated its rejection of a
U.N. watchdog's appeal to abandon its nuclear program and to
accept foreign inspections.
Armitage, who arrived in Seoul on Tuesday, discussed North Korea
with President Kim Dae-jung, Foreign Minister Choi Sung-hong and
Defense Minister Lee Jun.
"In my meetings today, we reaffirmed our common interest in
finding a diplomatic solution to North Korea's destabilizing
pursuit of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction,"
Armitage said in a written statement.
Washington and its allies are trying to pressure the North to
give up its nuclear ambitions.
Earlier Tuesday, North Korea's state-run news agency, KCNA, said
the communist state rejects as "unilateral and biased" the
International Atomic Energy Agency's resolution urging North
Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program and open its
facilities to outside inspectors.
North Korea cannot accept the Nov. 29 resolution because "the
United States dubbed the (North) an 'axis of evil' and a target
of the pre-emptive nuclear attack, creating a serious crisis,"
KCNA said.
During the meetings in Seoul, Armitage also discussed
Washington's possible war against Iraq.
Domestic media reported that South Korea is willing to provide
logistical support. The country dispatched engineering and
medical units during the 1991 Gulf War.
Armitage was scheduled to leave for China on Wednesday and to
visit Australia later in the week.
His visit comes amid rising anti-U.S. sentiment in South Korea
over last month's U.S. military court acquittals of two U.S.
soldiers whose armored vehicle hit and killed two Korean girls in
an accident in June.
Armitage again conveyed Washington's "deepest apology" for the
deaths. President Bush had apologized, but that has failed to
allay the growing anger.
Past anti-U.S. protests involved small groups of activists, but
current demonstrations are drawing thousands.
Protesters demand that the two U.S. soldiers be retried in a
South Korean court and that the 1966 Status of Forces Agreement,
or SOFA — which covers American troops' legal status — be revised
to give South Korea more jurisdictional power.
South Korea is a close U.S. ally and hosts 37,000 U.S. troops.
Most South Koreans tolerate or support the U.S. military
presence, but accidents and crimes involving soldiers here have
been a constant source of discontent.
President Kim said Tuesday that current demonstrations should not
be used as a platform for anti-Americanism and demands for the
withdrawal of U.S. troops.
"I am relieved that so far protesters only demand an apology by
President Bush and a revision of SOFA, and that they are
separating their demands from anti-Americanism and demands for
the withdrawal of U.S. troops," Kim was quoted as saying by his
office.
Copyright © 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The
*****************************************************************
10 Expert sees future for nuclear power
Oakland Tribune Online
[http://www.oaklandtribune.com/]
Last Updated: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 -
By William Brand, STAFF WRITER
SAN FRANCISCO -- Nuclear power -- more the butt of sick radiation
jokes and cost-overrun complaints in recent decades than a prized
source of energy -- still has a future in America, the former
head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Monday.
"Nuclear power has had a rough ride," said Shirley Ann Jackson,
who headed the commission during the Clinton administration. "The
last use permit for a nuclear power plant was issued in 1979, and
the last nuclear plant went on line in 1996," she said. "And
since 1979, more than 20 nuclear plants have closed, and more
than 20 other proposed plants have been canceled. But nearly 20
percent of America's electricity is still produced by nuclear
power."
Much has happened since the Three Mile Island partial nuclear
meltdown, Jackson said. "In the United States, the nuclear
industry has had an enviable safety record."
She predicted that in the next five to 10 years, electrical power
primarily will be provided by fossil fuels, burning natural gas
and coal. Currently, coal-burning generators provide half of
America's electrical power.
But a decade from now, nuclear power may well be the energy
choice, Jackson said. Nuclear power does not contribute
greenhouse gases or pollutants, she added.
Ernest J. Moniz, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology
physicist, suggested the world may have little choice because of
global warming.
If one takes the general guideline that during the next century
we have to emit no more greenhouse gases annually than we do
today -- despite a large increase in the demand for energy --
then nuclear plants begin to look more attractive, Moniz said.
However, during a morning discussion by scientists at the annual
meeting of the American Geophysical Union, some problems
associated with nuclear energy emerged, including plant security,
disposal of nuclear waste and convincing a dubious public that
the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear mishaps could not
happen again.
For example, a scientist cited the Department of Energy's own
environmental impact report on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste
disposal site, approved this past summer by Congress. Once the
site begins accepting nuclear waste, the report estimates it will
require 3,215 train shipments and 1,079 truck shipments over 24
years to fill the first bore, 1,000 feet down in the mountain.
There are now about 70,000 metric tons of nuclear waste at 131
locations in 39 states. That waste has been produced since the
start of the nuclear power age.
The biggest problem, said Jean L. Younker, senior principal
scientist for Bechtel SAIC, will be lawsuits over the routes
taken to haul nuclear waste and the site's safety.
Bechtel represents several private utilities that want to ship
their waste to Yucca Mountain.
The Department of Energy notes that more than 2,700 shipments of
nuclear waste have been made in the United States in the past 30
years without mishap. There has never been a release of
radioactive material harmful to the public or environment,
according to the agency.
Jackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy,
N.Y., pointed out there already is a resurgence in nuclear power.
Nuclear plants were originally licensed for 40 years, but since
1998 plants have been receiving Nuclear Regulatory Commission
approval to operate an additional 20 years.
She said 10 have received renewal permits, 25 or more are waiting
for a renewal permit, and 15 others have indicated they intend to
ask for a permit to keep producing power, Jackson said.
She said while nuclear power plants originally were very
expensive, the older plants have paid off their costs and in the
future will generate electricity quite cheaply -- half the cost
of natural gas generation -- she said.
©1999-2002 by MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers
*****************************************************************
11 TXU, inspectors to discuss Comanche reactor problems
Star Telegram | 12/10/2002 |
By Neil Strassman Star-Telegram Staff Writer
A reactor at the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant that was shut
down in September because of leaking and corroded tubing is
having a tough time getting going again, officials said.
The reactor -- which was shut down for 50 days to repair more
than 660 corroded and cracked tubes and for refueling -- has been
started and stopped twice since Nov. 15 and is under repair and
out of service.
"The reactor should be back in operation in a number of days,"
said TXU spokesman David Beshear. "The bottom line is safety, and
we have systems in place that work correctly."
TXU is scheduled to meet today at the plant with a Nuclear
Regulatory Commission special inspection team that has
investigated problems with the steam-generating tubes.
"This will be a discussion of the team's preliminary findings and
a look at what the company has been doing to address the
problem," said Ken Clark, NRC spokesman.
Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort
Worth, went on-line in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two.
The troubled reactor, Unit 1, resumed operation Nov. 15 but was
shut down Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU
officials said.
The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a
blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod
to drop into the reactor's core, Beshear said. The control rod is
a safety measure that slows the nuclear reaction in the core.
On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to
repair an electric coil. That's when plant workers found that the
coil failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the
control rod, Beshear said.
He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work
is being done.
Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor
inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said
"such leaks are not uncommon" at the canopy seal by the control
rod.
"It's not a major safety problem," Johnson said. "It's an
operating problem."
None of the problems has posed a safety or public health risk,
TXU and NRC officials said. Comanche Peak's second reactor,
completed in 1993, remains unaffected and continues to operate.
In early December, Comanche Peak workers found deposits of boric
acid crystals around the leak, a potential concern because a
boric acid buildup was blamed for extensive corrosion in the top
of the Davis-Besse nuclear reactor near Toledo, Ohio.
Similar corrosion was not found at Comanche peak, Johnson said.
But the leaking and cracked steam-generating tubes, the subject
of today's meeting with the NRC, are a longstanding problem at
plants that were built with Westinghouse-engineered pressurized
water reactors.
The Westinghouse systems were installed in both commercial
nuclear power plants in Texas, Comanche Peak and the South Texas
Project.
The thin tubes are made of a stainless steel alloy called Inconel
600. They have cracked and leaked within 10 years at some plants
designed to last 40 years, according to NRC records.
The tubes carry superheated, radioactive water from the reactor
core to convert nonradioactive water into steam for
electricity-generating turbines.
The tube problem has led to at least 14 lawsuits against
Westinghouse, all of which have been settled out of court with
most court documents sealed.
At least 19 steam-generating systems have been replaced at U.S.
nuclear power plants for $100 million to $200 million per plant,
records show. The South Texas project replaced its steam
generators in the past two years.
TXU is "continuing to evaluate replacement" of its steam
generators at Comanche Peak, Beshear said.
Neil Strassman, (817) 390-7657 strass@star-telegram.com
[strass@star-telegram.com]
*****************************************************************
12 Problems keep reactor at nuclear power plant closed
AP Wire | 12/10/2002 |
[miamiherald.com - The miamiherald home page]
Associated Press
FORT WORTH, Texas - A reactor at a nuclear power plant that was
shut down after leaking radioactive water is still out of service
despite two attempts over the past month to get it running again.
The reactor at the Comanche Peak plant was shut down in September
to repair more than 660 corroded and cracked tubes and for
refueling.
"The reactor should be back in operation in a number of days,"
said TXU spokesman David Beshear. "The bottom line is safety, and
we have systems in place that work correctly."
TXU is scheduled to meet Tuesday at the plant with a Nuclear
Regulatory Commission special inspection team that has
investigated problems with the steam-generating tubes.
"This will be a discussion of the team's preliminary findings and
a look at what the company has been doing to address the
problem," said Ken Clark, NRC spokesman.
Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort
Worth, went online in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two.
The troubled reactor resumed operation Nov. 15 but was shut down
Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU officials said.
The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a
blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod
to drop into the reactor's core, Beshear said.
The control rod is a safety measure that slows the nuclear
reaction in the core.
On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to
repair an electric coil. Plant workers found that the coil
failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the
control rod, Beshear said.
He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work
is being done.
Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor
inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said
"such leaks are not uncommon" at the canopy seal by the control
rod.
"It's not a major safety problem," Johnson said. "It's an
operating problem."
None of the problems has posed a safety or public health risk,
TXU and NRC officials said, but the September incident prompted
government scrutiny of the utility's plan for finding such leaks.
[http://www.knightridderdigital.com
*****************************************************************
13 'Extraterrestrial alien' invades nuclear plant*
, Daily Journal*
*December 10, 2002*
BRAIDWOOD -- A crazed Chicagoan, swearing to be an
extraterrestrial alien, crashed his car through the gates of the
Braidwood nuclear facility late Monday before speeding away only
to be arrested for reckless driving in Wilmington minutes later.
Khalil I. Ghandor, 29, was arrested by Wilmington officer Don
Thomas at 11:37 p.m. after Ghandor allegedly ran a motorist off
the road then barreled across the bridge on Baltimore Street with
his lights off.
Wilmington police Chief James Metta said Ghandor did not appear
drunk and gave no indication of being connected to a terror cell.
He was also cited by Braidwood police. Will County sheriff's
police cited him for trespass.
No injuries resulted. Metta said the intruder is alleged to have
penetrated the parking area by crashing through closed gates,
flashing past a plant checkpoint and then doing "donuts" in the
parking lot.
This web site and server is updated and maintained by The Daily
Journal, Kankakee IL 60901 Copyright
© 2002 The
Daily Journal Publishing Co., L.L.C., All Rights Reserved. Please
*****************************************************************
14 Bulgarian Power Plant?s Fate Hangs in the Balance
10 December 2002
The Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) announced on 3 December that
it is drafting an official demand to hold a national referendum
on keeping open the country?s only nuclear power plant, Kozloduy.
The government agreed in November to a European Union request to
close units 3 and 4 of the plant in 2006 in exchange for a
promise to allow the country into the EU in 2007.
The EU considers the units unsafe because of a lack of
containment, despite Sofia?s numerous claims that the
Soviet-designed reactors have been upgraded and could run safely
for up to another decade. ?We are watching a bunch of arrogant
people who feel free to ignore the will of the nation and turn
down all calls for real debate on the real issue,? said Rumen
Ovcharov, deputy chairman of the BSP, when asked to comment on
the leftists? decision.
?The BSP will hold fast in defending every Bulgarian national
interest in the course of the accession process to the EU, the
Kozloduy nuclear power plant issue in particular,? he said.
According to the Bulgarian constitution, only the parliament can
decide to hold a national referendum. If it decides to do so, the
president must set the referendum date within one month.
The six-unit Kozloduy nuclear plant provides 45 percent of
Bulgaria?s electricity. The plant is located some 200 kilometers
north of the capital, Sofia, on the Danube River near the
Bulgarian-Romanian border.
On 29 November, in an open vote, the parliament rejected two
no-confidence motions filed by the leftist Coalition for Bulgaria
(KB) and the rightist United Democratic Forces (ODS). The
initiators both from the right and left say that the government?s
promise to close Kozloduy?s units 3 and 4 in 2006, as required by
the EU, was in violation of the Bulgarian parliament?s decision
on the issue.
?If units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant are shut
down in 2006, as required by the European Commission, Bulgaria
will suffer a loss of $1 billion to $1.25 billion by 2020,?
analyst Georgy Ganev, programming director for the Center for
Liberal Strategies, told Novinite Online on 6 December.
?After the closure of the first and second reactors of the
Kozloduy nuclear power plant, electricity prices will increase
more than 12 percent during the first stage,? said Kuzma Kuzmanov
of the Bulgarian Atomic Forum (Bulatom). According to Kuzmanov,
electricity prices will be at least three times higher after the
shutdown of the reactors.
Kuzmanov says the Kozloduy units generate about 5 billion
kilowatt hours annually, or about 12 percent of the total
electricity generated in the country.
Bulgarian Foreign Minister Solomon Passy defended the planned
closures, saying that EU pre-accession financial aid for Bulgaria
would amount to approximately $1.3 billion more than would be
generated by the reactors.
?Holding a referendum is not realistic at present,? Passy said on
4 December, pointing out that referendums have not been held for
more important issues, such as EU and NATO accession. ?From now
on politicians must manfully take responsibility and not hide
behind the decision of the people,? he said.
ODS leader Nadezhda Mihailova said the party would not support
the Socialists? request for a national referendum. ?I think this
is an act of populism,? she said on 4 November.
?The choice between the European Union and the nuclear plant is
irrelevant. Bulgaria needs a successful energy policy, and that
can be maintained by the government, which understands what the
Bulgarian national interests are,? said Mihailova.
On 4 December the online news site Mediapool.bg published the
final results of an Internet-based survey on the plant?s fate.
According to the survey, only 26 percent of Bulgarian adults are
aware that the dispute centers on the shutdown of the old
reactors. Almost 20 percent of those surveyed mistakenly believe
that the EU is demanding that the entire plant be shut down.
Despite a general lack of awareness of the issue among the
public, over 3,000 people joined in a rally in Sofia on 2
December to protest the closure of the old reactors. The rally
was organized by the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary
Organization (VMRO) and the Civil Committee on Defense of the
Kozloduy Nuclear Plant. The protesters carried placards reading
?We want a referendum? and ?VMRO: Let?s defend the nuclear
plant.?
?Bulgaria is neither economically nor technically prepared for
the closure of the Kozloduy units,? Radicals Union deputy
chairman and former nuclear plant director Danail Tafrov told the
Bulgarian Telegraph Agency.
?Bulgaria can only lose if there is no transparency in our
relations with the European Commission and, in particular,
transparency in regard to the Kozloduy nuclear power plant,?
Bulgarian President Georgy Parvanov told reporters in Stara
Zagora on 30 November.
?Those who claim that the Kozloduy nuclear power plant?s units 3
and 4 should be closed down do not have any arguments to back up
their stand. Bulgaria?s position is strong and we should find a
way to defend it,? Parvanov said on 3 December in a meeting with
nuclear power engineering experts.
Parvanov said that there were consistent contradictions
concerning the fate of the nuclear plant based on the findings of
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Bulgaria?s aim is to prompt a peer review that will convince the
EU that the country can keep units 3 and 4 running, he said,
adding that he hoped the review would take into consideration the
IAEA?s conclusions.
Earlier, on 24 October, Parvanov had sent a letter to the leaders
of EU member countries, as well as to the European Commission and
the European Parliament, insisting on a peer review of the units
in order to prove their operational safety. Parvanov?s letter
quoted the National Assembly?s 2 October decision that said
Bulgaria would not close down the two reactors before EU
accession.
Foreign Minister Passy said at the time that Parvanov?s letter
might have intervened with Bulgarian diplomacy. According to
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Luibomir Todorov, however, no one
had exceeded his or her powers and or breached regulations.
?The government has a very clear concept of what is going on with
Kozloduy units 3 and 4, and, considering that the EU has signaled
clearly enough its readiness to conduct the peer review we have
suggested, we continue to believe that the ministers who are
directly or indirectly engaged in the negotiations are acting in
the correct manner,? said Todorov.
?I believe we have wonderful relations with the president, and
having differences on certain matters does not affect either the
relations or the joint work,? said Passy, referring to the
differences that have arisen between him and Parvanov on certain
matters, including Kozloduy.
--by Konstatin Vulkov
/TOL/ article, please email us at react@tol.cz
Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved.
/Dec. 10, 2002, 7:33PM/
*Associated Press*
GLEN ROSE - The public was never in danger after a leak at a
North Texas nuclear reactor, and plant officials followed the
proper procedures in shutting down the device, a Nuclear
Regulatory Commission official said today.
A reactor at TXU's Comanche Peak Steam Electric Plant was shut
down in September after leaking low-level radioactive water,
which did not escape from a protective containment area,
officials said Tuesday.
"In response to the indications they had, they took very good and
appropriate action," said Dwight Chamberlain, director of the
division of reactor safety at the NRC's Arlington office.
The reactor was shut down when the water was leaking at a rate of
about half a cup a minute. The plant's requirement for shutting
down is a leak of 1 cup a minute; the NRC requires action at 2
cups a minute, TXU officials said.
NRC officials on Tuesday presented a report from a special
inspection team, which found that three incidents of human error
led to the steam generator tube leak. The plant is unlikely to be
fined or otherwise penalized, Chamberlain said.
In two of the mistakes, TXU made the necessary corrections. The
NRC still is examining the third incident, in which a plant
employee reviewing computer data failed to report a marginal
problem that later led to the leak, TXU officials said.
"We've already retrained all of our analysts for looking at this
data," said Lance Terry, a TXU senior vice president and
principal nuclear officer. "You take a lesson learned and you
retrain people."
Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort
Worth, went online in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two.
The reactor was shut down to repair more than 660 corroded and
cracked tubes and for refueling. It remains out of service for
unrelated problems despite two attempts over the past month to
get it running again.
Terry said the reactor could be operating again by later this
week.
The troubled reactor resumed operation Nov. 15 but was shut down
Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU officials said.
The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a
blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod
to drop into the reactor's core, TXU spokesman David Beshear
said.
The control rod is a safety measure that slows the nuclear
reaction in the core.
On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to
repair an electric coil. Plant workers found that the coil
failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the
control rod, Beshear said.
He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work
is being done.
Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor
inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said
such leaks are not uncommon at the canopy seal by the control
rod.
*****************************************************************
16 Calvert Cliffs FONSI
FR Doc 02-31167
[Federal Register: December 10, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 237)]
[Notices] [Page 75864-75865] From the Federal Register Online via
GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr10de02-56]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-318]
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc., Calvert Cliffs Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit No. 2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 50.44, 46 and Appendix K for Facility
Operating License No. DPR-69, issued to Calvert Cliffs Nuclear
Power Plant, Inc. (the licensee), for operation of the Calvert
Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2 (Calvert Cliffs), located
in Calvert County, Maryland. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR
51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact. Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action, as described in the licensee's
application for exemption [[Page 75865]] dated July 12, 2002,
would allow the licensee to use up to four lead fuel assemblies
(LFAs) with an advanced cladding material, a zirconium- based
alloy, that does not meet the definition of Zircaloy or ZIRLO,
which are referred to in Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations Section 50.46(a)(1)(i). The LFAs are scheduled to be
loaded into the Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 reactor core during the
upcoming refueling outage and would remain in the core for two
(2) cycles.
The Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed exemption from 10 CFR 50.44, 10 CFR 50.46, and
Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50 is needed because these regulations
specifically refer to light-water reactors containing fuel
consisting of uranium oxide pellets enclosed in zircaloy or ZIRLO
tubes. A new zirconium-based alloy cladding has been developed,
which is not the same chemical composition as zircaloy or ZIRLO.
Therefore, the licensee needs an exemption to insert up to four
assemblies containing the new fuel cladding material into the
Calvert Cliffs reactor core for test during operation.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action
and concludes that the proposed exemption will not present an
undue risk to the public health and safety. The safety evaluation
performed by Westinghouse demonstrates that the predicted
chemical, mechanical and material performance of the Advance
zirconium-based cladding is within that approved for Zircaloy-4
or ZIRLO under all anticipated operational occurrences and
postulated accidents. Furthermore, the LFAs will be placed in
non-limiting core locations. In the unlikely event that cladding
failures occur in the LFAs, environmental impact would be minimal
and is bounded by previous environmental impact statements.
The proposed action will not significantly increase the
probability or consequences of accidents, no changes are being
made in the types of effluents that may be released off site, and
there is no significant increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure. Therefore, there are no significant
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed
action.
In regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It
does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant
nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the
proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff
considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action''
alternative). Denial of the application would result in no change
in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of
the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resource
than those previously considered in the Final Environmental
Statement for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP)
dated April 1973 or the Final Environmental Impact Statement for
licence renewal for the CCNPP dated October 1999. Agencies and
Persons Consulted
On September 5, 2002, the staff consulted with the Maryland
State official, Richard McLean of the Maryland Department of the
Environment, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed
action. The State official had no comments. Finding of No
Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC
concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant
effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact
statement for the proposed action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see
the licensee's letter dated July 17, 2002. Documents may be
examined, and/ or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document
Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site,
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
[http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving
FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html]
. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at
1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov
[pdr@nrc.gov] .
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of December 2002.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Guy S. Vissing, Acting
Chief, Section 1, Project Directorate I, Division of Licensing
Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR
Doc. 02-31167 Filed 12-9-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
*****************************************************************
17 Nuclear Plant Equipment Problems Worsening as Reactors Age
[Newhouse News Service]
[http://www.religionnews.com]
By STEPHEN KOFF
WASHINGTON -- Equipment breakdowns at nuclear power plants are
not unusual.
Pipes crack, break or clog, springing leaks with some regularity.
Pumps stall or freeze up. Steam generator tubes burst. Steel
components can get brittle from being bombarded with
radioactivity. Nuclear industry officials acknowledge as much.
But the problem is getting worse as the nation's inventory of
nuclear reactors gets older. In addition, deregulation of
electrical power is increasing competition, making the nuclear
industry more reluctant to seek out problems that would require
the tremendous expense of repair shutdowns. At the same time,
federal budget squeezes are making it more difficult for the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission to monitor the industry.
The result is growing concern about expensive, potentially
dangerous nuclear plant failures.
"Given plant aging and materials issues," there are likely to be
other instances of cracks and leaks like those that led to the
closing of the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant near Toledo, Ohio,
earlier this year, according to a confidential analysis by the
influential Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. "This type of
event is likely to recur," the analysis said.
Similarly, a research report compiled last year by engineers at
several laboratories affiliated with the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission warned, "The number of occurrences of age-related
degradation has been increasing as nuclear power plants age."
Aging equipment, whether in a nuclear plant or an automobile,
can, of course, be repaired or replaced.
But as many nuclear power plants approach the final 10 years of
their 40-year operating licenses, they are undergoing fewer
safety tests and inspections, according to engineers with close
ties to the nuclear industry. That raises the likelihood that
cracks and corrosion will not be caught in time, they say.
The combination of the two trends -- fewer inspections and aging
components -- sets the stage for compounding problems.
"The utilities are trying to squeeze down their operation and
maintenance costs," said Harold Ornstein, who until 2000 was a
senior engineer and technical adviser for the NRC, where his
investigations included Three Mile Island. He said utilities are
pushing their staffs to keep the plants running -- at the expense
of finding equipment problems that might require a shutdown.
"The idea is to pass the (inspection) test; the idea is not to go
out and tell you what the problem is," Ornstein said.
The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, the industry's own
research group, acknowledges the profit pressures. If a plant
shuts down its reactor to inspect a potential problem, it has to
purchase replacement power. The costs often run into hundreds of
thousands of dollars a day.
Pressure on staffs to keep a plant operating was a factor in all
but one significant reactor problem since 1993, according to the
confidential institute report.
"Therefore, given today's competitive environment, pressure to
continue operating may be a notable contributor to future
significant events," the report said. The institute's analyses
are considered among the most credible in the industry, and
insurers use them to set rates.
"There's a big move on to reduce costs, to take tests that were
once done monthly and now make them quarterly, and things that
used to be done quarterly are now done yearly and so on," said
David Lochbaum, a nuclear safety engineer with the Union of
Concerned Scientists.
"Aging equipment, coupled with fewer safety checks and
inspections, makes it more likely that something will break or
fail or be degraded below the prescribed safety margins,"
Lochbaum said.
Though the incident at FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.'s
Davis-Besse plant, where leaking boric acid ate a hole in the
reactor lid, was considered extreme, nuclear power plants in
South Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Florida and Michigan have
seen signs of similar stress cracks or leaks in nozzles or welds,
according to incident reports filed with the NRC.
In other recent signs of aging:
Last December, a backup pump designed to send water to steam
generators at Union Electric Co.'s Callaway nuclear plant near
Fulton, Mo., failed to do its job. A piece of foam from a storage
tank seal had weakened with age and broken loose, lodging in the
pump's intake valve during a routine test, NRC reports show. Had
the other backup pumps been turned on, they too could have
ingested loose foam and become clogged, presenting a potential
cooling problem if the main systems failed. As had happened at
Davis-Besse, the plant had ignored industry warnings and deferred
inspections, according to an NRC review.
In 2000, inspectors found cracks, one of them four inches long,
in the weld of a giant coolant pipe at South Carolina Electric
and Gas Co.'s Summer plant near Columbia, S.C., where boric acid
had been leaking for an undetermined time. Workers failed to find
the cracks during a previous inspection, discovering them only
when the plant shut down for refueling. Had the cracks burst, a
massive amount of radioactive coolant could have escaped.
And last January, a jet pump inside a reactor vessel broke at
Exelon Generating Co.'s Quad Cities plant near Moline, Ill.,
requiring a shutdown. Jet pumps increase the flow of water
through the reactor core. Although the manufacturer had
recommended replacing the jet pumps in the 1980s, Quad Cities
never did. Nor had the plant inspected the part that broke --
because a manufacturer's guide did not identify it as among the
components that could weaken with age.
More than 30 percent of nuclear power plant equipment failures in
recent years were at least partly a result of the equipment
having aged, according to a presentation at a conference in 2000
by Steve Nichols, a senior evaluator in the Institute of Nuclear
Power Operations' engineering department. Nichols said he could
not comment for this article, citing institute policy.
Researchers working in concert with the government have quietly
voiced concerns for nearly a decade about the consequences of
plant aging.
"Effects of aging degradations, if they are not mitigated, will
eventually lead to failures that could adversely affect plant
safety and performance," said a 1993 study by the Oak Ridge
National Laboratory.
So far, safety and backup systems at nuclear power plants have
prevented life-threatening catastrophes in the United States -- a
fact the industry and regulators cite to dispel fear and
criticism.
NRC officials note that for all the expense and negative
publicity generated by the 1979 Three Mile Island partial
meltdown, the public was not harmed. Officials say plants in the
United States have so many backup and safety systems that the
massive radiation release and deaths from the 1986 Chernobyl
disaster could never happen here.
"It's not the perfect system from the standpoint of `nothing will
ever fail.' You will have failures. You will have things that
leak. You will have cracks," said Alex Marion, director of
engineering for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's
lobbying and trade group.
"The challenge, of course, is to have inspection and maintenance
programs in place where you can identify these kinds of
situations prior to having a serious problem at a plant."
"I think what the public ought to feel good about," said Stephen
Floyd, the Nuclear Energy Institute's senior director of
regulatory reform, "is the defense in depth that's built into the
plants. Not everything breaks at the same time, fortunately."
NRC officials say the number of serious incidents at nuclear
power plants has steadily fallen, one reason the agency lets
power plants operate longer without shutting down for inspections
or repairs.
The agency periodically issues warnings for parts known to fail
or crack -- including the nozzles that guide nuclear fuel rods,
which in the case of Davis-Besse had been leaking boric acid for
years.
Before it will give a plant permission to operate beyond its
initial 40-year license, the NRC requires a thorough inspection
that covers passive components such as buried pipes. Many of the
nation's 103 operating plants are expected to go through a
relicensing inspection in the next decade.
But it's no guarantee. In the case of Duke Energy Corp.'s Oconee
nuclear plant near Greenville, S.C. -- a relicensing front-runner
-- cracks were not noticed when it underwent, and passed, an
extensive inspection to renew its license for an additional 20
years. After the NRC granted the renewal, the cracks appeared.
Critics say that while the number of serious incidents is down,
that trend is likely to reverse, turning higher simply as a
function of age.
Still, industry defenders say, the problem at Davis-Besse was not
so much a failure of aging equipment, but rather of FirstEnergy
to adequately investigate what it should have known was a
potential problem.
"Safety culture includes a good questioning attitude on the part
of the plant personnel," said George Apostolakis, a nuclear
engineering professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
and chairman of an NRC committee that advises regulators on
reactor safeguards. "There were several indications (of problems)
there that people didn't seem to interpret correctly."
But the NRC doesn't hold itself blameless. A "lessons learned"
task force it assembled to assess the Davis-Besse incident
concluded among other things that the agency, beset with staffing
and "resource allocation" issues, had too few inspectors at the
plant and "missed several opportunities" to find the problem.
(Stephen Koff is Washington bureau chief for The Plain Dealer of
Cleveland. He can be contacted at [skoff@plaind.com] .)
*****************************************************************
18 TVA offers Net site for children --
The Oak Ridger Online -- State News --
12:01 p.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002
The Associated Press
KNOXVILLE -- The Tennessee Valley Authority hopes to reach
younger residents of the Tennessee Valley with an Internet site
created especially for children.
The interactive site, http://www.tvakids.com, offers graphics
and colorful text geared to fourth- through eighth-graders, along
with lesson plans for teachers and field trip information.
"The addition of the Web site devoted to children helps TVA
reach our future stakeholders across the Tennessee Valley," TVA
Chairman Glenn McCullough said. "Tvakids.com provides children
and educators with helpful information about the mission of TVA,
the importance of our work and the history that brought us here."
The site covers TVA's multiple roles as the country's largest
public power producer -- through nuclear power, fossil fuel and
hydroelectric generation -- and manager of the country's
fifth-longest river system with responsibilities ranging from
flood control to recreation.
TVA supplies electricity to 8.3 million people through 158
distributors in Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina,
Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi.
[http://www.oakridger.com] All Contents ©Copyright The Oak
Ridger
*****************************************************************
19 Schumer, Clinton ask NRC to look at security
By JIM FITZGERALD Associated Press Writer
December 10, 2002, 5:30 PM EST
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. -- Sen. Charles Schumer said Tuesday that the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission should immediately review security
at the Indian Point nuclear power plants, which he suggested has
"more holes than Swiss cheese."
Sen. Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, said she would reintroduce a
bill that would assign a federal security coordinator to every
sensitive nuclear plant in the country.
Also Tuesday, Rep. Sue Kelly asked the new federal Department of
Homeland Security to investigate Indian Point security and
Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano called on the federal
government to take over security duties at nuclear plants.
The politicians were responding to a report that only 19 percent
of the security officers at Indian Point 2 who were questioned
after the 2001 terrorist attack said they could adequately defend
the plant.
"When it comes to nuclear security, we expect the highest safety
and security standards to be met," Schumer said. "The NRC needs
to step up to the plate and launch a vigorous review so that we
can accurately assess what is going on at the plant once and for
all."
In a letter to NRC Chairman Richard Meserve, Schumer, a Democrat,
said he was also troubled by the report's suggestion that mock
attacks on Indian Point were manipulated to make sure they would
not be successful.
Neil Sheehan, an NRC spokesman, said that Schumer's letter had
not been received but that the commission is "pretty satisfied
that the security they have at the plant is capable of repelling
an attack."
Guards "have to meet pretty strong requirements and they have to
requalify each year," Sheehan said. "If they can't measure up,
they're not allowed to be on the job."
Kelly, a Republican whose district includes Indian Point, told
Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge, "The residents of this
community must know that every precaution is being taken to
protect Indian Point and any weakness in plant security must be
addressed immediately."
Spano, a Democrat, said the federal government should take over
security at nuclear plants just as it has at airports.
"If the federal government believes that airports are a potential
terrorist target and in need of federal security, it is only
logical that nuclear power plants are in even greater need of a
federal security force," he said.
The county executives of Rockland, Putnam and Orange counties,
all within 10 miles of Indian Point, endorsed Spano's proposal.
The Senate Environmental Committee approved a measure last year
to assign a federal security coordinator to plants like Indian
Point, but the bill did not come to a Senate vote. Clinton,
D-N.Y., said she would reintroduce it.
"We know that terrorists turned airplanes into missiles," she
said. "We don't want them to turn power plants into nuclear
weapons."
Clinton also gave the NRC until Jan. 15 to explain what it is
doing to correct security flaws.
The report on security, which was commissioned by Entergy Corp.
soon after it purchased Indian Point 2, is a year old but was
made public this week. Entergy spokesman Jim Steets said many of
the security concerns raised in the report had been resolved.
Another Entergy spokesman, Larry Gottlieb, said Tuesday that
giving more power to the private security force at Indian Point
would be more constructive than turning the job over to the
federal government.
He said eliminating some "red tape at the state level," including
restrictions on what guns the private force can carry, would
strengthen security.
Copyright © 2002, The Associated Press
Newsday.com
*****************************************************************
20 Detecting smuggled nuclear material
By Elaine Shannon
Monday, December 9, 2002 Posted: 5:43 PM EST (2243 GMT)
*How concerned is the government that a terrorist could smuggle
nuclear material into the U.S.?*
Concerned enough that the U.S. Customs Service is quietly
installing new technology to better detect radiation at mail
facilities, airports, seaports, rail yards and across the U.S.
border.
The new "radiation-portal-detection systems," costing $100,000 to
$150,000 apiece, will supplement current technology, which
consists of radiation "pagers" worn on the belts of customs
personnel.
Containers and vehicles will pass through the devices, which can
pick up a wider variety of radioactive emissions than the pagers,
from weapons-grade plutonium to medical waste that could be used
as shrapnel in a "dirty bomb."
And unlike the pagers, which only check containers singled out
for inspection, the new portal devices will be routinely applied
to all cargo, not just the high-risk kind.
Customs is installing the devices at the exit gates of the
nation's major seaports and at key traffic choke points, such as
international bridges, tunnels, rail crossings and U.S. Postal
and private parcel-shipping facilities.
One prototype has already been deployed at a busy commercial
crossing along the U.S.-Canadian border. More will follow--but to
foil terrorists, Customs isn't advertising where or when. And no
photos are permitted.
*© 2002 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.*
*****************************************************************
21 Bosnian Bombing AFTEREFFECTS
TOL home
During NATO?s 1994 and 1995 bombings of Bosnian Serb positions
around Sarajevo, NATO aircraft used munitions containing depleted
uranium, a slightly radioactive heavy metal that is effective in
piercing armor. Most of those bombs were fired in Hadzici. In one
day in October 1995 alone, NATO planes fired 300 projectiles into
the Sarajevo suburb. According to the Bosnian government, NATO
forces fired some 10,800 rounds of 30mm armor-piercing
projectiles during the war.
Under the November 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement, some Sarajevo
suburbs held by Serbs during the war came under the control of
the mostly Bosniak and Bosnian Croat federation entity of Bosnia.
One of those suburbs was Hadzici. Most of the approximately
30,000 Bosnian Serbs who lived there fled their homes and moved
as refugees to other parts of the Republika Srpska entity of
Bosnia and to Yugoslavia.
Some 5,000 civilians from Hadzici fled to Bratunac, in eastern
Republika Srpska. Medical analysis conducted by the local
Institute for Health in 1998 showed that the mortality of Hadzici
refugees was double the mortality rate for the rest of Bratunac?s
residents. The study?s author, Dr. Slavica Jovanovic, told the
SRNA news agency that she has no doubt that depleted uranium is
responsible for the increased death rate of those people.
?We can say that the mortality rate of the refugee population is
greater because of high stress, poor nutrition, and bad living
conditions. But we were shocked to discover that deaths among
Hadzici?s refugees are much more numerous than [among] other
[refugees],? Jovanovic told SRNA. She blamed those deaths on the
fact that the refugees from Hadzici were exposed to radiation
because they lived close to the bombed locations.
In her report, Jovanovic wrote that since the end of the war, 25
percent of wartime Hadzici residents have died of various
cancers, tumors, and heart attacks. In Bratunac alone in the last
four years, 500 of the 5,000 Hadzici refugees have died. One
Hadzici refugee dies every three to four days, and every second
one dies from cancer.
Jovanovic said that she could not say for sure how many Hadzici
refugees have cancer because many do not check themselves into
hospitals since they cannot afford medical treatment. The doctor
said she is hoping that the international community will step in
and find some way to examine the town?s refugee population and
help provide treatment.
After the UNEP report was released, the Republika Srpska army
evacuated soldiers from its barracks in Han-Pijesak. Officials
say that organized medical exams will soon begin for soldiers who
were in the barracks during the past seven years.
At the same time, medical workers from the federation entity are
also sending out warnings to people still living in Hadzici--but
they are expanding their warning to the general public, which
they fear could also be affected by the presence of depleted
uranium. Federation health officials say they are also worried
that that radiation has caused an increase in the number of
diseases such as cancers--especially leukemia--tumors, cerebral
palsy, and others.
After the reintegration of Hadzici into the federation entity,
prewar Bosniak and Croat workers began cleaning out the munitions
warehouse and tank-repair facility, removing more than 1,000
truckloads of garbage and munitions
Now those workers fear they too have been contaminated.
Unfortunately, they will have to wait to find out. Workers have
begun undergoing medical examinations, but the results will not
be available until April 2003. What?s more, despite UNEP warnings
to immediately evacuate all workers because of danger of inhaling
depleted uranium dust, some workers from Hadzici are still on
duty.
?Believe me, I am very afraid. But if I have been inhaling
radiation for the past seven years, I can do it until they
publish the final results,? Zijad Fazlic, director of the Hadzici
tank-repair facility, told TOL on November 24. ?All we can do now
is to wait for the results. I don?t know what we are going to do,
but if I had known this, I would never have come here to work.
Families of workers also live here,? he said.
Soon after the UNEP report was published, federation medical
officials started to speculate that it is possible that depleted
uranium is the cause for the shocking jump in cases of leukemia
in children.
?It has not yet been proven, but we cannot see anything else
except uranium,? Edo Hasanbegovic, director of the ontological
department in Sarajevo?s Kosevo clinic, told the daily
/Oslobodjenje/ on 21 November.
Hasanbegovic said that research is set to begin soon to find out
whether a connection can be made between the increase in diseases
and depleted uranium. But he said he is certain that depleted
uranium is one of the elements that causes leukemia in Bosnia.
?That we can claim without medical research. Every year we have a
50 percent to 70 percent increase in the number of new underage
patients,? said Hasanbegovic.
Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved.
Lejla Saracevic, chief of radiobiology at Sarajevo University,
told TOL on 29 November that before the depleted uranium affair
was made known to the public, local experts had asked the
government to allow them to conduct research in potentially
contaminated areas. The government, however, refused, saying
there was insufficient money in the budget for such
research--research Saracevic said costs little.
Saracevic said that once the most critical locations have been
decontaminated, it is necessary to find out how much of the rest
of the region is radioactive. ?It has been a long time. In seven
years the uranium has migrated into the ground and through the
water. It is very possible that it now exists in our vegetation
and possibly in our food. Our priority is to check that now,? she
said.
Before the war in Bosnia, the annual number of new cases of
children with leukemia was never greater than 13. Since the end
of the war, that number has grown every year: Last year it was
26. The situation is the same with other cancers: Every year the
number grows. And almost 80 percent of those new cases are coming
from areas that were exposed to the radiation of depleted
uranium--areas that were bombed during the war.
The so-called Balkan Syndrome affair first aroused attention in
early 2001, when Italian media published reports that one Italian
soldier who had served in Bosnia had died of leukemia and that
five more were very ill. The Italian media blamed the sicknesses
on NATO?s use of depleted uranium in its weapons.
At the time, all governments denied that NATO was using
uranium-tipped munitions. Nonetheless, medical examinations of
soldiers were promptly begun, with many being diagnosed with
leukemia and other forms of cancer.
*****************************************************************
24 Construction accident sparks radiation concern
stltoday.com
By Bill Smith Of the Post-Dispatch
12/09/2002 05:00 PM
A bulldozer struck a piece of buried monitoring equipment at a
downtown construction site Tuesday, releasing a small amount of
radioactive material and forcing police to divert traffic away
from the area for about 15 minutes.
"There is no danger to the public at all," said Dennis Jenkerson,
St. Louis Fire Department batallion chief and head of the
department's hazardous materials team.
"It is all contained."
On a scale of 1 to 10, Jenkerson called the severity of the
accident a 1.
The construction site is at the southwest corner of Tucker
Boulevard and Chouteau.
Jenkerson said the small device was buried about a foot
underground and is used to measure soil density and moisture. He
declined to identify the construction company involved.
"We have to get to within three feet to get any reading at all,"
Jenkerson said of the damaged device.
*/For more information, check back with STLtoday.com or read
Wednesday's Post-Dispatch./*
*****************************************************************
25 The UN releases a study that lends credence to health experts? cries
that NATO?s wartime uranium-tipped weapons have left behind a deadly,
cancerous legacy./
TOL home
by Anes Alic and Dragan Stanimirovic <#author>
SARAJEVO and BANJA LUKA, Bosnia and Herzegovina--After two years
of silence, Balkan Syndrome--better known as the depleted uranium
affair--is getting its due attention. The United Nations
Environmental Protection Agency (UNEP) in November confirmed the
dangerous presence of depleted uranium in areas of Bosnia bombed
by NATO aircraft in 1994 and 1995, which Bosnian officials say
has led to a shocking increase in cancer-related deaths.
UN experts confirmed the discovery of two locations containing a
high level of radiation from depleted uranium from NATO bombings:
the Sarajevo suburb of Hadzici, where a munitions warehouse and a
tank-repair facility are located, and a Bosnian Serb army
barracks in Han-Pijesak, also near Sarajevo. Investigators
discovered uranium materials and dust inside the buildings.
The UNEP task force says that depleted uranium can create an
increase in uranium concentration 100 times the natural levels
contained in groundwater.
Upon the release of the November UN expert study on depleted
uranium, health officials from Republika Srpska confirmed that
uranium has indeed caused many civilian deaths in those two
regions. Health officials say that civilian deaths in those
regions are double what they are in other, unaffected regions.
Earlier this year, the Bosnian government invited 17
international experts to investigate rumors that depleted uranium
is still present in the environment and may be adversely
affecting the health not only of the local population but also of
international peacekeepers stationed in Bosnia.
The team of experts investigated 14 separate locations over a
one-month period, finding traces of radiation in three places.
Investigators were not able to examine eight other
locations--four small towns near Sarajevo and four others in
eastern Bosnia--deemed to be too risky due to the presence of
land mines.
Pekka Haavisto, who heads the UNEP task force, told the daily
Oslobodjenje: ?We are concerned about the situation at the
Hadzici tank-repair facility and the Han-Pijesak barracks and the
health condition of the citizens.? Haavisto said that after being
analyzed in Western European laboratories, the final results
would be released in March 2003.
Recent years have brought growing concern among experts that
shrapnel from depleted uranium-tipped weapons from could cause
cancer or other radiation-related problems. According to health
experts, dust particles from depleted uranium could be inhaled,
or the substance could leach into the ground and the water
supply.
"Balkan Syndrome Resurrected" Previous page 1 2
3
Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved.
*****************************************************************
26 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing
Las Vegas SUN:
December 10, 2002
ASSOCIATED PRESS
LAS VEGAS (AP) - Nevada's nuclear projects agency chief is urging
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to delay a scheduled
transportation briefing until the state delivers its views about
risks in shipping high-level nuclear waste.
But officials with the NRC's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste
said it was unlikely the agenda for next week's meeting would
change.
Bob Loux, the state's top appointed official opposing the Yucca
Mountain nuclear dump, also asked the federal nuclear regulatory
agency to give Nevada a "substantive" role in testing casks
designed to haul nuclear waste by truck and rail to the desert 90
miles northwest of Las Vegas.
After complaining that the state was left out of a two-day
government and industry workshop last month, Loux accepted an
offer to present the state's research to the federal science
advisory board in coming months.
He asked the five-member science panel to postpone its Dec. 18
transportation briefing before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Loux said in a letter that the delay would help "assure that the
commission has the benefit of a more complete and balanced
picture of spent fuel and high level waste transportation."
Committee associate director Sher Bahadur said the advisers will
be presenting observations, not recommendations, during their
annual meeting with the five Nuclear Regulatory Commission
members.
The advisers also are scheduled to discuss the regulatory panel's
Yucca Mountain review plan, the durability of nuclear waste
containers, repository risk factors and volcanic issues, Bahadur
said.
Loux also said in a Monday letter to NRC chairman Richard Meserve
that Nevada has a stake in ensuring that the casks used to
transport nuclear material to Yucca Mountain can withstand
accidents, terrorist acts or sabotage.
He noted that New Mexico and other states participated in testing
a container used to ship mixed nuclear waste to the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M.
Loux said the NRC has yet to release its draft protocol for cask
testing and has not rescheduled public meetings that were to be
held in Nevada last summer.
The advisory committee is composed of scientists who weigh
technical issues in the planned development of a nuclear waste
repository at Yucca Mountain. The committee passes its advice to
NRC commissioners who would review an Energy Department license
application to build and run the dump.
Advisory panel chairman George Hornberger denied Nevada was
snubbed at last month's transportation workshop. He said the
session was designed to focus on "generic" issues, not Yucca
Mountain.
All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc.
*****************************************************************
27 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste to Meet December 17 - 19
in Rockville, Maryland
NRC: News Release - 2002-142 -
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs
Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail:
opa@nrc.gov [opa@nrc.gov] www.nrc.gov
No. 02-142 December 10, 2002
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE TO MEET DECEMBER 17 - 19
IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Printable Version [PDF Icon]
The Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Advisory Committee on
Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has scheduled a meeting on December 17 - 19
in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other issues, staff
analyses for understanding the performance of the proposed
nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and an
examination of the NRCs nuclear waste safety research and
technical assistance programs. Committee members also will meet
with NRC Commissioners to discuss a number of waste-related
topics.
The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room
T-2B3 of the agencys Two White Flint North building, at 11545
Rockville Pike, except for the session with the NRC
Commissioners, which will be held in the Commissioners
Conference Room of the agencys One White Flint North building,
at 11555 Rockville Pike. The ACNW meeting will begin at 10:30
a.m. the first day, 8:30 a.m. on the second day, and 8 a.m. the
final day.
A complete agenda is attached.
For additional information or schedule changes, please contact
Howard Larson at 301-415-6805.
ACNW Meeting Agenda
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2002, CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3, TWO WHITE
FLINT NORTH
10:30 - 10:40 P.M. Opening Statement
The Chairman will open the meeting with brief
opening remarks, outline the topics to be discussed, and indicate
several items of interest.
10:40 - 12:15 P.M. Staff Analyses for Understanding
Repository Performance
The Committee will hear presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff on its analyses
on the use of risk information for the proposed Yucca Mountain
repository.
12:15 - 1:30 P.M. ***LUNCH***
1:30 - 3:30 P.M. Preparation of ACNW Reports
The Committee will discuss proposed reports on the
following topics:
Staff Analyses for Understanding Repository
Performance
Conclusions Regarding the Safety of Spent Nuclear
Fuel Transportation
Trip Report: October Visit to Swedish Waste
Management Facilities and Participation in Berlin Quadripartite
Meeting
3:30 - 3:45 P.M. ***BREAK***
3:45 - 6:00 P.M. Preparation for Meeting with the NRC
Commissioners
The next meeting with the NRC Commissioners is
scheduled to be held on December 18 at 9:30 a.m. in the
Commissioners Conference Room, One White Flint North. The
Committee will review its proposed presentations.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18
8:30 - 8:35 A.M. Opening Statement
The Chairman will make opening remarks regarding
the conduct of todays sessions.
8:35 - 9:10 A.M. Discussion of Topics for Meeting with the
NRC Commissioners
Discussion of topics scheduled for the ACNW meeting
with the NRC Commissioners at 9:30 a.m.
9:10 - 9:30 A.M. ***BREAK***
9:30 - 11:30 A.M. Meeting with the NRC Commissioners
The Committee will meet with the NRC Commissioners
in the Commissioners Conference Room, One White Flint North to
discuss the following:
HLW Program Risk Insights Initiative
Yucca Mountain Review Plan
Spent Fuel Transportation
Igneous Activity at Yucca Mountain
Container Life and Source Term KTI
11:30 - 1:00 P.M. ***LUNCH***
1:00 - 3:30 P.M. NRC Nuclear Waste Safety Research and
Technical Assistance Programs
The Committee will hear from representatives of the
NRC staff and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses on
the NRCs Waste Safety Technical Assistance and Research
programs.
3:30 - 3:45 P.M. ***BREAK***
3:45 - 6:00 P.M. Preparation of ACNW Reports
The Committee will discuss proposed reports listed
under a previous item.
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19
8:00 - 8:05 A.M. Opening Statement by the ACNW Chairman
The Chairman will make opening remarks regarding
the conduct of todays sessions.
8:05 - 10:45 A.M. ACNW Action Plan
The Committee members will discuss the ACNW
2002/2003 Action Plan and outline plans for sessions to assess
Committee performance and update its priorities.
10:45 - 11:00 A.M. Miscellaneous
The Committee will discuss matters related to the
conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues
that were not completed during previous meetings, as time and
availability of information permit.
11:00 A.M. Adjourn 139th Meeting
Tuesday, December 10, 2002
*****************************************************************
28 Editorial: Whistleblower probe was full of problems
Las Vegas SUN:
December 10, 2002
In May 2001 the Energy Department hired the Morgan Lewis law
firm to investigate whistleblower allegations and personnel
disputes involving the quality assurance program at the Yucca
Mountain project. James Mattimoe, the whistleblower who said the
department mishandled quality assurance concerns raised by
project employees, was fired after a Morgan Lewis report claimed
that it was actually Mattimoe who abused his authority, a
finding he disputes. Ultimately the Labor Department sided with
Mattimoe and found that he was fired unfairly.
But there's much more to the story. Morgan Lewis previously had
represented nuclear power industry interests. And just 18 days
after its report against Mattimoe was issued, the law firm
registered as a lobbyist for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the
industry's top trade association, to push Congress to pass
legislation in 2002 designating Yucca Mountain as the nation's
nuclear waste dump. The Energy Department's selection of Morgan
Lewis -- and the firm's subsequent findings against Mattimoe --
should not be too shocking for a department that conducted a
one-sided investigation into Yucca Mountain's suitability, a
sham review that favored the nuclear power industry.
Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., is right to call for an Office of
Government Ethics investigation to probe conflict-of-interest
issues involving the hiring of Morgan Harris. It's a shame that
Congress wasn't aware of these facts before it voted earlier
this year on Yucca Mountain's fate.
All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc.
*****************************************************************
29 Radioactive truck returning to Twin Falls
Brigham Young University - Idaho Scroll
TWIN FALLS, Idaho
(AP) — The U.S. Department of Energy needs state regulatory
approval before it opens a contaminated nuclear waste shipment
returned to Idaho in August.
The DOE does not have a facility in Idaho or New Mexico with
permits to deal with shipments of mixed radioactive and other
hazardous waste in containers that become contaminated during
transport.
The shipment was going to New Mexico for permanent storage in an
underground salt bed. But it was sent back to Idaho because
radioactivity was detected in the innermost compartment of the
container.
The container was hit by a drunken driver just 23 miles short of
its destination, but it is unknown if that accident caused the
contamination deep inside the vessel. DOE officials said they
found no evidence of a radiation release into the environment and
the cask was not damaged.
Now the DOE wants a 120-day waste storage variance from the state
so the shipment can be repackaged and examined for the cause of
the contamination.
The work would be done at the Idaho National Engineering and
Environmental Laboratory’s Test Area North, said Brian Monson,
with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality in Boise.
The Department of Environmental Quality will likely require the
DOE to come up with a plan in case this happens again, Monson
said.
The container holds fourteen 55-gallon drums of mixed waste,
including plutonium-contaminated trash such as lab coats, and
plastic covers that also are tainted by substances such as
cleaning solvents.
*****************************************************************
30 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing*
RENO GAZETTE-JOURNAL
Associated Press
12/10/2002 11:15 am
Nevada's nuclear projects agency chief is urging the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission to delay a scheduled transportation
briefing until the state delivers its views about risks in
shipping high-level nuclear waste.
But officials with the NRC's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste
said it was unlikely the agenda for next week's meeting would
change.
Bob Loux, the state's top appointed official opposing the Yucca
Mountain nuclear dump, also asked the federal nuclear regulatory
agency to give Nevada a"substantive"role in testing casks
designed to haul nuclear waste by truck and rail to the desert 90
miles northwest of Las Vegas.
After complaining that the state was left out of a two-day
government and industry workshop last month, Loux accepted an
offer to present the state's research to the federal science
advisory board in coming months.
He asked the five-member science panel to postpone its Dec. 18
transportation briefing before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Loux said in a letter that the delay would help"assure that the
commission has the benefit of a more complete and balanced
picture of spent fuel and high level waste transportation."
Committee associate director Sher Bahadur said the advisers will
be presenting observations, not recommendations, during their
annual meeting with the five Nuclear Regulatory Commission
members.
The advisers also are scheduled to discuss the regulatory panel's
Yucca Mountain review plan, the durability of nuclear waste
containers, repository risk factors and volcanic issues, Bahadur
said.
Loux also said in a Monday letter to NRC chairman Richard Meserve
that Nevada has a stake in ensuring that the casks used to
transport nuclear material to Yucca Mountain can withstand
accidents, terrorist acts or sabotage.
He noted that New Mexico and other states participated in testing
a container used to ship mixed nuclear waste to the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M.
Loux said the NRC has yet to release its draft protocol for cask
testing and has not rescheduled public meetings that were to be
held in Nevada last summer.
The advisory committee is composed of scientists who weigh
technical issues in the planned development of a nuclear waste
repository at Yucca Mountain. The committee passes its advice to
NRC commissioners who would review an Energy Department license
application to build and run the dump.
Advisory panel chairman George Hornberger denied Nevada was
snubbed at last month's transportation workshop. He said the
session was designed to focus on"generic"issues, not Yucca
Mountain.
© Copyright Reno Gazette-Journal >, a Gannett Co. Inc.
*****************************************************************
31 Prejudice against nuclear reprocessing must go: Chidambaram
|
*****************************************************************
32 State records on LES recruitment sought *
* *Tuesday, 12/10/02*
By KELLI SAMANTHA HEWETT
/Staff Writer/
Officials say group will find nothing inappropriate/*
Some opponents of a proposed uranium enrichment plant in
Hartsville, Tenn., are looking for a state paper trail to see if
the governor and top economic commissioner actively recruited
Louisiana Energy Services, a consortium of U.S. and foreign
businesses.
State and business officials say the wooing never happened.
The Tennessee Environmental Council, a leading opponent of the
uranium plant, made its requests yesterday for all ''records,
communications and the names of personnel involved in any
meetings, discussion or work regarding LES operations in
Tennessee.''
The state's open records law makes available all state
communications relating to LES or Urenco, a company in the LES
consortium whose technology would be used in the proposed uranium
enrichment plant.
LES wants to build the $1.1. billion plant in Trousdale County.
It earlier had considered Unicoi County in East Tennessee. Some
residents and environmental opponents are worried about health
and safety risks.
''We have speculated for several months that the governor's
office was involved in recruiting LES,'' said Will Callaway, of
the environmental council. ''We feel we need to know more about
incentive offers and to what extent local officials were
involved.''
Copies of Callaway's letter were sent to both Gov. Don Sundquist
and Tony Grande, commissioner of the Department of Economic and
Community Development. Officials from both offices said they plan
to provide the information.
The governor was among several state officials who made an
economic development trip in the fall. The trip came after LES
announced its desire to come to Middle Tennessee.
''The governor and his staff met with Urenco officials,'' said
Melanie Catania, a spokeswoman for Sundquist. ''It was a standard
part of the trip. They meet with industry leaders all the time.
Urenco had expressed an interest in coming to Tennessee. It's
natural to meet with companies interested in locating in
Tennessee.''
The recruiting effort was pretty routine, Grande said. A standard
recruitment letter went out to Urenco in early summer after
officials learned LES might be interested in Unicoi. State
officials then sent a similar letter when LES shifted its
interest to Hartsville.
''There has not been a lot of effort to recruit LES,'' Grande
said. ''Sometimes these organizations use these requests as
publicity stunts, but our office has a history of being
upfront.''
LES spokeswoman Nan Kilkeary also said state officials did no
early recruitment or special recruitment.
''They are certainly entitled to whatever information, but they
won't find anything,'' Kilkeary said. ''The state of Tennessee
made no active recruiting effort.''
This is the second time in less than a week that the Tennessee
Environmental Council has taken action on the LES issue. On
Friday, the organization sent out letters to five county
executives asking them to consider waiting until 2004 to make a
decision so that the issue* *could be added to the general
election ballot. The five counties are key members in the Four
Lake Regional Industrial Development Authority, which owns about
250 acres of land that LES wants to buy for the new uranium
enrichment plant. Local leaders say they expect to decide on
selling the land in March.
HOME | LOCAL NEWS
*****************************************************************
33 *Borough Council unanimously opposes landfill?s radiation monitoring plan*
Evan Brandt, Mercury Staff Writer December 10, 2002
*POTTSTOWN -- Monitoring garbage for radiation should happen
before it gets on the truck, not when it shows up at the landfill
-- at least that?s how Pottstown Borough Council sees it.*
A unanimous vote Monday saw a resolution passed that opposes a
plan by the Pottstown Landfill to monitor incoming trash trucks
for potential contamination by radiation.
The plan is required by law, and a hearing on the landfill?s
proposal is set for Monday at the Montgomery County Community
College?s west campus in Pottstown.
Although these plans are being enacted at landfills around the
commonwealth, the hearing in Pottstown is the only one being held
in Pennsylvania.
It begins at 7 p.m.
But before any public comment is taken at that hearing, Borough
Council has now already registered its unanimous opposition.
Included in the plan, explained Borough Councilman Robert Downie,
is a proposal to accept three kinds of low-level radioactive
waste.
Those include waste from nuclear medical procedures, waste
containing naturally occurring radioactive materials and
electronics containing naturally occurring radioactive materials.
All three are said to have short half-lives and thus pose little
public threat.
But Downie and others remain unconvinced.
"We have a duty to protect future generations," said Downie. "We
have to do the best we can to prevent the creation of a problem
which could cause them harm."
"Remember," added Councilman Stephen Toroney, "the landfill is
nearing the end of its capacity. Whatever radioactive stuff they
take will be at the top of the heap."
"We know there is some (radiation) in there already, but we have
to be proactive," said Downie. "It?s the cumulative effect which
may end up causing more harm than we ever believed."
Downie said the council is particularly concerned about the fact
that the Pottstown Sewer Authority is under a contract to treat
the landfill?s leachate for 30 years after the closure of the
landfill.
Allowing low-level radioactive waste into the landfill could
cause the leachate to become radioactive and thus contaminate the
sewer system, the waste water treatment plant and even the
Schuylkill River, into which the borough?s treated sewage is
spewed.
Also expressing concern Monday night was Donna Cuthbert, an
activist with the Alliance for a Clean Environment.
She suggested the monitoring plan "won?t protect the public."
"When you consider the number of trucks coming in there, it?s
impossible for them to inspect them all. They would have to
monitor a truck every two minutes, and it?s not going to work,"
she said.
"If DEP wants to protect the public, they should put monitors on
the trucks before radioactive waste gets dragged through this
community," said Cuthbert. "The responsibility should be dealt
with at the point of origin.
"Waste Management (which owns the landfill) is in business to
make money, and with 300 trucks per day coming in, they are not
going to stop the whole operation because they have detected a
radioactive tissue," Cuthbert said.
But that is exactly the example John Wardzinski, who runs the
Pottstown Landfill for Waste Management, used when he spoke about
the plan after Monday?s meeting.
Noting that the plan and the process by which it will be carried
out is required by law and "not our idea," Wardzinski said the
monitors through which the trucks will drive "really can detect a
radioactive tissue, that?s no exaggeration."
He said, "From the reports I?ve seen from other landfills which
have already done this, a lot of trucks are being stopped because
of kitty litter, because people?s cats are getting treated at the
vet and then it gets into the kitty litter."
Wardzinski said DEP experts, not anyone at the landfill, will
determine the threat posed by any radioactive waste that is
pulled out as a result of monitoring.
"It?s the DEP that will be making any determination about whether
or not it can be safely disposed of in the landfill, not us,"
Wardzinski said.
/©The Mercury 2002/
*****************************************************************
34 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites
December 10, 2002 [News Content]
[TehranTimes Navigation]
By Our Staff Writer
THERAN -- A high-ranking Israeli officer threatened that the
Zionist regime would launch nuclear attack on Islamic holy sites
in the Middle East, an Israeli newspaper said Sunday.
In case Israel was attacked by states or groups, the Jewish
state would respond by dropping nuclear bombs on Islamic cities
such as Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia and Qom in Iran. The
Haaretz newspaper quoted an unidentified high-ranking officer a
s saying.
It is an irony of our time Iraq has been suffering for a decade
because it is accused of having some capabilities of
unconventional weapons, while Israel announces that it possesses
nuclear weapons, but there is not any international action
against it.
The officer, a guide in the Israeli military academy, was
quoted as saying that Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear
warheads along with their delivery systems, including long-range
ballistic missiles, long-range bombers and nuclear submarines.
Indeed, while is Iraq under the pressure, Israel is the only
entity in the Middle East to possess a huge arsenal of weapons
of mass destruction, including a sizable nuclear arsenal.
It is unfortunate that the United States, Israel's main
protector, has always prevented any serious move to discuss
Israel's weapons of mass destruction. But at the same time it
has accused a number of other countries of trying to acquire
weapons of mass destruction. It has put them under pressure on
the basis of the very baseless accusations it has leveled
against them.
It is time the Islamic world in the first place and the
international community too took serious action to contain
Israel. The Zionist regime is an occupationist, expansionist
entity. It must be contained, else the entire world will be in
danger.
Home Page [http://www.tehrantimes.com/default.asp] |
[webmaster@tehrantimes.com]
*****************************************************************
35 U.N. Teams Head Toward Iraq Uranium Mine
Las Vegas SUN
December 10, 2002 By CHARLES J. HANLEY ASSOCIATED PRESS
BAGHDAD, Iraq- International nuclear monitors drove six hours
across the Iraqi desert to a remote uranium mining site in one of
five inspections mounted Tuesday, a marked expansion of the U.N.
field operation. Still more inspectors were flying to Iraq later
in the day.
Iraq's chief liaison to the U.N. teams, meanwhile, told a Baghdad
newspaper the Iraqis have found the inspectors to be working in a
"calm and professional" manner. But he again complained about
last week's surprise inspection of one of Saddam Hussein's
palaces, calling it an American-inspired provocation.
Tuesday marked the end of the second week of field missions for
the U.N. inspectors, who have returned to Iraq after a four-year
absence under a Security Council resolution requiring the Baghdad
government to give up any remaining chemical or biological
weapons, and shut down any programs to make them.
Iraq denies it still has such weapons or programs.
The Iraq field missions were expanding as U.N. analysts began
combing through 12,000 pages of documents submitted by Iraq to
the United Nations over the weekend, detailing past programs of
weapons of mass destruction and what it says are purely civilian
programs today in the chemical, biological and nuclear areas.
Inspections in the 1990s, after Iraq's defeat in the Gulf War,
led to the destruction of tons of chemical and biological
weapons, and to the dismantling of Iraq's program to try to build
atomic bombs.
Tuesday, reporters followed several cars of U.N. nuclear experts
to mining operations at Ashakat, in the desert near the Syrian
border 250 miles west of Baghdad. The enormous complex surrounded
by antenna posts, some broken, sat in an otherwise empty quarter
of the desert. Reporters were unable to follow the inspectors
inside.
The U.N. team presumably wanted to assess current Ashakat
operations in the light of what was found there by U.N. nuclear
inspectors in the 1990s.
In the 1980s, the phosphate deposits at Ashakat had been
exploited for their uranium content as well as for fertilizer,
producing some 100 tons of uranium over six years.
Also Tuesday, other nuclear inspectors headed again for
al-Tuwaitha, Iraq's major nuclear research center, 15 miles
southeast of Baghdad, Iraqi Information Ministry officials
reported. It was their third recent visit to the sprawling
complex, where Iraqi scientists in the 1980s worked on developing
technology for enriching uranium to levels usable in bombs.
A third U.N. team was reported to have gone to a veterinary
medicine establishment at Abu Ghraib, just west of Baghdad -
presumably the Amariyah Serum and Vaccine Institute, site of
biological weapons-related research in the 1980s.
That institute is reported to have expanded its storage capacity,
to an extent the U.S. government says exceeds Iraq's needs. Iraq
contends the facility only makes and stores human vaccines.
Other inspectors were reported to have gone Tuesday to a military
training center in Baghdad and to an industrial facility at
al-Furat, just south of the Iraqi capital. The purposes of those
visits were not immediately known.
In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair said it would be "naive" to
believe Saddam plans to comply with U.N. demands for his
disarmament in the field of weapons of mass destruction.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Blair also restated the
readiness of the United States and Britain to take military
action against Saddam.
"If there is a breach and Saddam doesn't comply, then we are
prepared to take action," Blair was quoted as saying.
Later Tuesday, about 25 additional inspectors were scheduled to
arrive on a flight from a U.N. rear base on the Mediterranean
island of Cyprus, bolstering the U.N. inspection staff to
approximately 70. Inspection team leaders have said they hope to
expand operations to eight teams by year's end.
In an interview published Tuesday in the weekly al-Rafidayn, Lt.
Gen. Hossam Mohammed Amin, chief Iraqi liaison, said of the
inspectors' "behavior" that "we're satisfied with it so far
because it is calm and professional."
Iraqi officials have complained sharply, however, about the U.N.
inspection Dec. 3 of Baghdad's al-Sajoud palace, one of Saddam's
many presidential palaces. Amin reiterated that criticism. "The
visit took place under pressure from the United States of America
to create a crisis or confrontation between Iraq and inspection
teams, but this did not happen," he asserted.
Such palace inspections contributed to the U.N.-Iraqi tensions
that ended with the collapse of the previous inspection regime in
1998. The new U.N. resolution declares the monitors have
unrestricted power to inspect such sites.
Asked how long he expects the new U.N. inspections to take, Amin
said that if the inspection agencies are "sincere," he thinks
they should take eight months.
"Then the Security Council should suspend the sanctions imposed
on Iraq and the monitoring process would continue," he said.
He was referring to international economic sanctions imposed on
Iraq after it invaded Kuwait in 1990, and to U.N. plans to
establish a long-term system of monitoring Iraq's
military-industrial complex - via surveillance gear, required
reports and periodic visits.
All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc.
*****************************************************************
36 India to buy Russian submarines, a strategic bomber, and…
A Package Deal for a Future War
13:55 2002-12-10
We seem to have already forgotten the old-fashioned Soviet
tradition that was widely used before perestroika: unpopular
goods were forced upon clients together with the purchase of
popular goods. It was a package deal, and these goods would not
be sold separately. Today’s Russian authorities have decided look
at this Soviet tradition from a different angle
The Associated Press informs that in the coming years, Russia
will sell several nuclear submarines and a strategic bomber to
India. However, if India wants the deal to be successful, it must
additionally purchase a batch of training fighter planes.
The Russian website Lenta.Ru quotes RF Deputy Minister of Defense
Mikhail Dmitriyev as saying in an interview to India’s newspaper
the Hindustan Times that Russia and India plan to conclude a
package agreement by the beginning of next summer. It is supposed
that the Indian armed forces will buy an undisclosed number of
submarines of the Akula class and a Tu-22 bomber. It is not clear
yet whether or not the Indian military structures will also buy
the trainer planes. The Indian Ministry of Defense makes no
comments on the issue.
Meanwhile, India is currently the world largest importer of
Russian weapons. Against the background of the increasing tension
in the world, it is highly likely that India will find good use
for Russia’s training planes, which, by the way, can be easily
transformed into battle-ready planes.
Ahtyam Ahtyrov PRAVDA.Ru
Translated by Maria Gousseva
Read the original in Russian:
http://economics.pravda.ru/economics/2002/7/21/64/4066_weapons.ht
ml
[http://economics.pravda.ru/economics/2002/7/21/64/4066_weapons.h
tml]
Copyright ©1999 by "Pravda.RU [http://www.pravda.ru/] ". When
*****************************************************************
37 U.S. Sees Nuclear Deterrence Against WMD Attack*
/ Tue December 10, 2002 07:12 PM ET /
By Randall Mikkelsen
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reminded Iraq and other
countries on Tuesday that it was prepared to use nuclear weapons
if necessary to respond to an attack from weapons of mass
destruction.
The warning, which underscored longstanding U.S. policy leaving
open the use of nuclear weapons if needed, was contained in a
statement of U.S. strategy against nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons -- the first update since 1993.
The six-page strategy document says deterring attacks with the
threat of "overwhelming force" is an essential element in
protecting America and its allies from weapons of mass
destruction, also known as WMD.
"The United States will continue to make clear that it reserves
the right to respond with overwhelming force -- including through
resort to all our options -- to the use of WMD against the United
States, our forces abroad, and friends and allies," the strategy
report said.
"In addition to our conventional and nuclear response and defense
capabilities, our overall deterrent posture against WMD threats
is reinforced by effective intelligence, surveillance,
interdiction and domestic law enforcement capabilities," it said.
Senior U.S. officials said the passage was not included the
previous U.S. strategy document on weapons of mass destruction,
which emphasized efforts to prevent proliferation, and said the
new document did not represent a shift in U.S. policy on when it
would use nuclear weapons.
But the passage was put in the new report as part of an increased
emphasis on the role of deterrence against a weapons of mass
destruction attack, they said.
Other major elements of the new strategy include strengthening
nonproliferation measures, beefing up defenses and combating the
effects of an attack on the population.
The strategy report was released amid the looming possibility of
war with Iraq, which the United States accuses of possessing
weapons of mass destruction, officials said.
"The language speaks for itself, and I think it does apply to any
state that would use weapons of mass destruction against us," a
senior official said.
But the warning emphasizes and makes explicit for other countries
a private warning Bush's father, former President George Bush,
made in a letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein on the eve of
the first Gulf War.
In that letter, the United States threatened the "severest
consequences" if Iraq were to use chemical or biological weapons
against the United States, destroy Kuwaiti oil fields or
participate in terrorism.
"It was clear in terms of the message that we would respond with
all of our options. ... The Iraqis have told us that they
interpreted that letter as meaning the United States would use
nuclear weapons, and it was a powerful deterrent," the official
said.
Although Iraq later set fire to Kuwaiti oil fields and supported
terrorism, the official said, it did not "cross the line" of
using chemical or biological weapons.
*****************************************************************
38 Press freedom prize awarded to Russian reporter Grigory Pasko
www.sunspot.net
*****************************************************************
40 Government asks for extension in whistleblower suit
MyInKy
December 10, 2002
PADUCAH, Ky.- The U.S. Department of Justice has asked for a
six-week extension to determine whether the federal government
will join a whistleblower suit accusing Lockheed Martin Co. of
causing widespread contamination when it operated the Paducah
Gaseous Diffusion Plant.
A request was filed Monday. It is the 14th time since the suit
was filed in June 1999 that the government has asked for an
extension, and each one has been approved by U.S. District Judge
Joseph McKinley Jr.
The suit will not be litigated until the government makes its
decision.
In asking for a delay in October, Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill
Campbell told the judge that he "anticipated the matter will be
processed for a final decision on intervention" by Dec. 17.
The week after that delay was granted, a federal grand jury in
Louisville began investigating whether Lockheed's activities were
criminal, according to former workers who have been asked to
testify.
Campbell said the additional time is needed to review thousands
of pages of documents and material gathered by investigators, and
that the grand jury investigation is not the reason.
Lockheed and its predecessor companies operated the plant for the
Energy Department from 1982 until 1992.
The suit claims Lockheed made false statements involving storage
and disposal of radioactive waste, exposure of workers to
contaminants, and contamination of groundwater and soil with
plutonium, neptunium and other radioactive materials.
Because of the false statements, Lockheed was paid hundreds of
millions of dollars in operating fees that it didn't deserve, the
suit contends. It also claims the company's activities caused
contamination that is costing the government hundreds of millions
of dollars to clean up.
Information from: The Paducah Sun
[http://www.myinky.com
*****************************************************************
41 DOE to settle partial debt in land deal
The Oak Ridger Online -- Area News --
11:24 a.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002
by R. Cathey Daniels
Oak Ridger staff
In a move calculated to partially settle its debt for damage to
the Lower Watts Bar Reservoir, the Department of Energy is
working a land deal that would preserve 3,209 acres in Oak Ridge.
A DOE spokesman said Monday he did not know for how long the
property would be preserved in the "conservation easement" which
would be managed by the state.
The DOE would retain ownership of the land, which begins just
west of Wisconsin Avenue and continues west to wrap around the
K-25 site in three parcels.
The DOE will formally announce its agreement with the state at
12:30 p.m. Dec. 20 at Horizon Center. Assistant Secretary for
Environmental Management Jesse Roberson is expected to make the
announcement, with Gov. Don Sundquist and U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp,
R-3rd District, in attendance.
The action comes amid negotiations by the state, the DOE, the
Tennessee Valley Authority and the U.S. Department of Interior
for a settlement of an estimated $4.8 million to $7.2 million in
lost recreational use damages at Lower Watts Bar Reservoir due
to contaminated sediments from DOE activities.
It is estimated that it would cost $30 billion to remove the
contaminated sediments. DOE did not take remedial action,
according to the record of decision, because removal of the
sediment would cause further dispersion.
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act, DOE is liable for the restoration of natural
resources lost or injured from releases of hazardous substances.
The deal is worked through a Natural Resources Damage Claim,
which is part of the CERCLA. The parties form a Trustee Council
which oversees the action and determines restitution.
The land deal is reportedly only one of several expected
actions.
According to the DOE Oak Ridge Operations office, the Trustee
Council is continuing to assess the full extent of injuries to
the Lower Watts Bar Reservoir, and will continue to involve the
public in its deliberations, including the completion of an
ecological appraisal of land set aside for a conservation
easement.
Walter Perry, spokesman, said Monday that many details of the
deal "are yet to be determined" but that DOE "is working
diligently to make this happen."
The property mirrors that designated by the Land Use Focus
Group as Oak Ridge Reservation land appropriate for preservation.
R. Cathey Daniels can be contacted at (865) 220-5515 or
danielsrcd@oakridger.com [danielsrcd@oakridger.com] .
All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger
*****************************************************************
42 Bechtel Jacobs cites failed work planning in radioactive release
The Oak Ridger Online -- Area News --
12:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002
by R. Cathey Daniels Oak Ridger staff
A radioactive release at Oak Ridge National Laboratory which led
to the declaration of a July 1 "operational emergency";
activated the UT-Battelle Situation Management Team; and
required days of surveys and testing has been deemed
"preventable" and a result of failed work planning by Bechtel
Jacobs Co.
Company officials say the release was less than 2 millicuries.
A millicurie is one thousandth of a curie, which is a measure of
the rate of radioactive decay. A curie is equivalent to the
radioactivity of 1 gram of radium or 37 billion disintegrations
per second.
The release was attributed to a high-efficiency particulate air
filter change conducted by Duratek Federal Services, a
subcontractor to Bechtel Jacobs, the cleanup contractor for the
Department of Energy. Bechtel Jacobs managed the filter changes.
The filters were changed on the roof of Building 3038 on June
26 and June 27 and were pinpointed in the release of strontium
90 at the entrance to ORNL on 5th Street.
A Bechtel Jacobs final report was issued Monday. A Bechtel
Jacobs spokesman said Tuesday that there was "no possible
exposure off-site and minimal possible exposure on-site."
Workers and automobiles were sampled for exposure and none
found, said the spokesman.
Bechtel Jacobs conducted an investigation and concluded that
"investigation of potential hazards continues to be an area that
needs improvement" for the company and its workers and
subcontractors.
The investigation's findings included:
* Pre-filters for hot cells and glove boxes were removed and/or
left in incorrect positions during operations.
* Extreme ductwork contamination was not evaluated in facility
safety documents.
* Historic hazard screening was inadequate.
* Appropriately qualified personnel were not utilized during
planning and review of the work.
* Environmental hazards were not adequately addressed in the
work plan.
* A filter change-out procedure was not completed as required.
The contamination was first discovered June 29 in 5th Street
during routine radiological surveying for the opening of that
area as a new entrance to ORNL.
After further investigation radiological contamination was also
found in an alleyway between Buildings 3036 and 3047, at the
Building 4007 parking lot, the Central Avenue sidewalk, at the
flagpole parking lot across from Building 4500-N, at the parking
lot at Building 5000/5002 and in the construction area adjacent
to ORNL owned by the private sector.
When the Duratek operations were pinpointed as the suspected
cause of the problem, Bechtel Jacobs was called in to take over
investigations.
R. Cathey Daniels can be contacted at (865) 220-5515 or
danielsrcd@oakridger.com [danielsrcd@oakridger.com] .
All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger
*****************************************************************
43 ?Culture of Theft? Reported at U.S. Nuclear Lab
*Monday, December 9, 2002* Los Angeles Times
LOS ALAMOS, N.M. ? A ?culture of theft? at Los Alamos National
Laboratory costs taxpayers millions of dollars each year and
endangers national security, according to two investigators
recently fired by the laboratory.
Glenn A. Walp and Steven Doran, both former police officers, say
they were recruited by Los Alamos officials earlier this year to
investigate corruption at the lab, which houses the nation?s
nuclear secrets and monitors the quality of the nuclear arsenal.
But after finding far more corruption than Los Alamos officials
suspected ? including hundreds of missing items that could prove
valuable to terrorists or rogue nations ? the investigators were
handed identical letters of dismissal on Nov. 25 and escorted
from the laboratory by armed guards.
While becoming yet another embarrassment for the famously
troubled laboratory, the firings have sparked outcries in
Congress and conspiracy charges in the public.
?They?re going to rue the day they did this,? said Pete Stockton,
senior investigator with Project On Government Oversight, a
nonprofit group that monitors waste and fraud in the federal
government. ?This ranks as one of the stupidest things I?ve ever
seen an institution do.?
Laboratory officials say the investigators were fired because
their overly aggressive tactics and combative attitude alienated
workers. But the investigators contend they were fired because
their bosses cared less about safeguarding one of the nation?s
most important scientific and military sites than about
protecting the image of the University of California, which runs
Los Alamos for the Department of Energy.
Los Alamos officials acknowledge that the FBI and the Department
of Energy are looking into several leads turned up by the fired
investigators. Walp and Doran say those leads include glaring
lapses in security ? like one worker who tried to buy a $30,000
customized Ford Mustang with laboratory money, and another who
used her laboratory credit card to get $2,500 in cash at a
casino.
University of California officials said Friday that they will
urge the Energy Department to widen its inquiry into Los Alamos
to include the firings. ?We want them to address the assertion
that (Walp and Doran) may have been fired in retaliation for
(their) investigation,? said Michael Reese, spokesman for UC
President Richard Atkinson.
Begin optional trim
Home in the 1940s to the Manhattan Project, the nation?s historic
nuclear weapons program, Los Alamos has been sullied in recent
years by a series of security breakdowns ? including the
disappearance in June 2000 of classified computer hard drives
that later turned up behind a copy machine and the December 1999
indictment of Wen Ho Lee, a former lab scientist accused of
leaking nuclear secrets to China.
Although nearly all charges eventually were dropped against Lee,
he was found to have removed secret data from the laboratory, a
stunning breach.
(End optional trim)
?Through the years there has been ingrained within the laboratory
this culture of theft,? said Walp, 61, former head of the
Pennsylvania State Police who was hired to lead the internal
security force at Los Alamos last January. ?There is an attitude
that (theft) is the price of doing business.?
Los Alamos workers joke about theft increasing around the
holidays, Walp said, because some fill out their Christmas lists
with big-ticket items from the lab. ?The problem isn?t with
scientists,? Walp said. ?They?re just there doing their jobs.
It?s the middle people.?
Soon after arriving at the laboratory, Walp wrote a damning
report that estimated $3 million in equipment had been stolen
since 1999. Among the missing items were more than 260 computers
? some from the most sensitive areas of the laboratory, where
nuclear weapons are designed.
The report, Walp said, only served to irritate his bosses, who
often told Walp that his first loyalty was to the University of
California, not the U.S. taxpayer.
Los Alamos spokesman Jim Danneskiold dismissed the charge that
the facility is rife with corruption. ?There is no culture of
theft here,? he said. ?People do not walk out of here with
property.?
Danneskiold said roughly one-tenth of 1 percent of the lab?s $1
billion inventory disappears each year, far below the percentage
that large retail stores deem acceptable. Many items that appear
stolen, he said, are stored in some forgotten Quonset hut or
World War II-era shed. Los Alamos has more than 2,000 buildings
on its 40-square mile site, he said, and things get mislaid.
However, he insisted, ?there is no evidence that there is any
classified information on computers reported as missing.?
Although Walp and Doran considered themselves investigators,
Danneskiold said, they had no ?investigatory powers? but were
given the tasks of gathering information and acting as ?liaisons
with law enforcement.?
?The reason for terminating their employment was that they had
lost the confidence of different officials they had to work with,
both inside the laboratory and outside,? Danneskiold said.
Doran and Walp, however, said it was absurd to expect them to
retain the confidence of workers they were questioning. ?It?s the
most screwed-up system you ever saw in your life,? said Doran,
39, whom Walp hired at the laboratory in July. ?The fox is
watching the chicken house.?
Doran also scoffed at the suggestion that missing items were
merely ?mislaid.?
?One of the missing items was a 2-ton magnet,? he said. ?How do
you lose a 2-ton magnet??
The most shocking case of theft, Walp and Doran said, involved
two workers with access to all top secret areas. The workers
allegedly went on a brazen spree, using lab purchase orders to
acquire hundreds of items ? including spy gear, for reasons that
remain unknown.
?It?s unbelievable,? said Doran, a former Marine and ex-police
chief in Idaho City, Idaho. ?They bought camping equipment,
backpacks, lock picks, beacons, radio equipment, high speed
digital cameras, $9,000 worth of the best knives money can buy,
tractors, lawn mowers, wood chippers, floor sanders, fencing,
decks, carports, high-pressure washers, air conditioning units.?
Also, the two workers allegedly stole cryogenic freezers, which
Doran said could be useful to anyone developing biological
weapons.
The two suspected workers have been placed on paid leave, Los
Alamos officials said, while the FBI investigates. Doran called
it unfair and insulting that workers suspected of felonies remain
on paid leave, while he and Walp were summarily fired.
Also, Doran said, both he and Walp received outstanding
performance reviews just before being fired. Walp even got a
$5,000 bonus.
Both Walp and Doran have hired lawyers and may file a lawsuit.
(Optional add end)
Walp and Doran also may testify before Congress. A spokesman for
the House Committee on Energy and Commerce said the firings have
prompted grave concern among lawmakers, who likely will hold
hearings soon and send a team of their own investigators to Los
Alamos in the next few weeks.
?For some time now the committee has been quietly looking into
operations at Los Alamos,? said Ken Johnson, spokesman for Rep.
W.J. ?Billy? Tauzin, R-La., the committee chairman. ?But these
dramatic new developments clearly warrant full-scale
congressional investigation.
?Frankly, the accusations are extraordinary, and we?re determined
to get to the bottom of this mess.?
This page was created December 9, 2002
Copyright ©2002 The Repository
*****************************************************************
44 LANL Memo Stirs Fear of Reprisals* *
*Santa Fe New Mexican* *_home_*
By JEFF TOLLEFSON | The New Mexican 12/10/2002
Buried inside a memo ordering all employees at Los Alamos
National Laboratory to cooperate with federal investigators is
what might appear to be an inconsequential directive: Any
material turned over to investigators with the Office of
Inspector General should be forwarded to lab management as well.
*
"Employees providing copies of documents to the OIG (Office of
Inspector General) should provide copies of a set of those
documents to the Audits & Assessments Office," Los Alamos
Associate Director of Administration Richard Marquez wrote in the
Thursday memo.
Lab officials say the order is intended to help the lab respond
to questions from investigators. But critics pounced on the memo,
saying such an order compromises the confidentiality of employees
who fear retaliation by lab management. The reasoning is simple:
Employees will be less likely to cooperate if they have to go to
lab management with any material they provide to outside
investigators.
The memo also caught the eye of the U.S. Department of Energy's
Inspector General, which is currently looking into allegations of
fraud and other illegal activities - as well as alleged attempts
by management to cover up these wrongdoings. After learning of
the memo, the Inspector General released this response:
"The Office of Inspector General anticipates that audits,
inspections and investigations can be conducted without
impediment. We are troubled by any statement that could be
interpreted as hindering full and open cooperation with the
Office of Inspector General."
The Office of Inspector General declined to elaborate.
One watchdog group tracking the debate cited the Thursday memo as
proof the lab still doesn't understand - or doesn't care about -
recent allegations regarding security, accountability and
retaliation against whistleblowers.
"Given that Audits and Assessments is one of the central offices
that appears to be involved in the cover-up, ... that caveat
shows that Los Alamos management really doesn't get it," said
Danielle Brian, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based
Project on Government Oversight. "They don't understand that they
are the problem."
Laboratory spokesman Jim Danneskiold said the Audits and
Assessments Office maintains a list of materials provided to the
Inspector General to ensure the lab can respond to questions
posed by the investigators.
"The process of providing documents in this manner is part of the
extra effort the laboratory is making to ensure the IG gets a
comprehensive picture of the issues it is looking into," he said.
Citing the lab's whistleblower policy, Danneskiold said anybody
can provide these or any other documents to Audits and
Assessments through a process designed to maintain
confidentiality.
Nonetheless, the lab's whistleblower policy has come under fire
precisely because it does not protect the identity of those who
blow the whistle. The section on confidentiality stresses
situations in which the identity of a whistleblower could be
released to "supervisors, witnesses and alleged retaliators."
Brian, of the Project on Government Oversight, pointed to recent
allegations of retaliation against whistleblowers, including the
recent termination of two lab employees who were investigating a
current fraud case and other problems within lab ranks. Lab
officials said the employees "lost the confidence" of management
in Audits and Assessments and other divisions. But one of the
fired investigators countered that people in these same divisions
appeared to be covering up problems and inhibiting
investigations.
Brian said the memo taps into such fears: "How duplicitous to
say, 'Feel free to say whatever you want. We just want to know
everything you said.' "
The House Energy and Commerce Committee on Monday reaffirmed its
commitment to a "sweeping and far-reaching investigation" of
activities at the Los Alamos lab. A team of investigators will be
visiting the lab in the coming weeks, the committee said.
"Obviously we are very concerned about any possible
recriminations against employees," said committee spokesman
Kenneth Johnson.
"These are very serious allegations; in fact they are
extraordinary allegations, and Congress is determined to get to
the bottom of it," Johnson said. "We intend to use every resource
at our disposal, including hearings and subpoenas, if necessary,
to get a handle on what's going on at the lab."
The New Mexican*
*****************************************************************
45 Energy Secretary Points to Government/Industry Partnerships to
Solve Transmission Bottlenecks -->
energy.gov - Headquarters' Press Release
RELEASE DATE: December 9, 2002 [Print Friendly Version]
WASHINGTON, DC — Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham today
praised a government-industry partnership that could one day more
than double the amount of electricity carried on our nation's
high-voltage power lines.
The new cable, developed by the 3M Company, is made up of ceramic
fibers embedded in an aluminum matrix surrounded by
temperature-resistant aluminum-zirconium wires. The cable, called
Aluminum Conductor Composite Reinforced, is smaller in diameter
and lighter than the steel-reinforced conductor used today.
"The field test of this new conductor in Fargo is an example of
government-industry partnership working together to find sound
ways to upgrade our transmission system infrastructure,"
Secretary Abraham said. "DOE's leadership in the testing phase
helps to jump-start new technology like 3M's composite conductor
and bring innovative solutions to market sooner."
"In this effort, we brought together the technical expertise of
Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the hands-on operational
excellence of the Western Area Power Administration with
innovators such as the 3M Company. This is just one way DOE is
working hand-in-hand with industry to eliminate transmission
bottlenecks that restrict future economic growth in several areas
across our country," Secretary Abraham added.
The field test in Fargo, N.D., in progress for about a month now,
is testing the cable's mechanical ability to withstand harsh
weather conditions including high winds, extreme temperatures and
icing.
Media Contact: Jill Schroeder Vieth, 202/586-4940 Tom Welch,
202/586-5806 Release No. PR-02-255
*****************************************************************
46 Los Alamos Memo to Employees Stirs Fear
Guardian Unlimited | World Latest |
Tuesday December 10, 2002 3:10 PM
LOS ALAMOS, N.M. (AP) - A memo from the Los Alamos National
Laboratory telling employees to give the lab copies of documents
they provide to federal investigators compromises the
confidentiality of employees, critics said.
The message from the lab's associate director, Richard Marquez,
was in a memo Thursday that ordered employees at the nuclear
weapons lab to cooperate with investigators.
The Department of Energy and the FBI are looking into allegations
of theft and fraud at Los Alamos, including millions of dollars
in missing equipment and abuse of lab credit cards. The memo
instructed workers to forward any documents they provide to
investigators to the lab's Audits and Assessments Office. But
critics say the order prompts fears of retaliation by lab
management.
``How duplicitous to say, 'Feel free to say whatever you want. We
just want to know everything you said,''' said Danielle Brian,
executive director of Project on Government Oversight, a
Washington-based watchdog group.
Lab spokesman Jim Danneskiold said the audit division maintains a
list of materials provided to the Inspector General to ensure the
lab can assist investigators.
Two lab employees who were investigating fraud charges and other
problems within the lab were fired last month. Lab officials said
they had lost confidence in the pair.
On the Net:
Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://www.lanl.gov Project on
Government Oversight: http://www.pogo.org
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
*****************************************************************
47 DOE to reserve 3,200 acres for conservation
By Frank Munger, News-Sentinel senior writer December 10, 2002
OAK RIDGE - The U.S. Department of Energy plans to set aside more
than 3,200 acres of its Oak Ridge reservation for conservation
purposes.
Details of the property-management plan are not yet final, but
the federal agency will sign an agreement in principle Dec. 20
with state authorities, including Gov. Don Sundquist.
Walter Perry, a DOE spokesman in Oak Ridge, said Monday the
proposed action is partly in response to recommendations of a
land-use focus group, which included local citizens and
representatives of various business and environmental
organizations.
Setting aside the federal land for "green space" also will
address DOE's liabilities for natural resources damages under the
Superfund cleanup act, Perry said. Those liabilities are related
to contamination from Cold War nuclear activities at the
government's Oak Ridge facilities.
The land designated for conservation involves three parcels on
the northwest area of the federal reservation, including a rugged
section known as Black Oak Ridge. The undeveloped parcels are
adjacent to the East Tennessee Technology Park, a former
uranium-enrichment plant that's being cleaned up and converted to
private industrial uses.
DOE will retain ownership of the property but will turn over
management responsibility of the land to the state under an
easement to be signed later, Perry said.
The spokesman said there is no known contamination on the
designated parcels, but if subsequent surveys uncover any
problems, DOE will assume responsibility for cleanup.
Future use of the federal reservation has become a major issue in
Oak Ridge during the post-Cold War period. Some parties want more
land converted to economic development, with others arguing for
environmental protection.
DOE has turned over several parcels for industrial use, and this
will be the second area set aside for conservation. In 1999, DOE
signed a land-use permit that designated 3,000 acres for wildlife
preservation on the southeast part of the reservation near Melton
Hill Lake.
Frank Munger is a senior writer who covers the Department of
Energy. He can be reached at 865-482-9213 or
twig1@knoxnews.infi.net.
The Knoxville News-Sentinel Co. All Rights Reserved.
*****************************************************************
48 Portrait: Daniel Ellsberg
Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian |
'It's time to take risks'
In 1971, former marine Daniel Ellsberg leaked documents that
exposed US government lies and helped end the Vietnam war. He
tells Duncan Campbell why he did it, and why he is calling on
today's officials to do the same to the Bush regime - and prevent
a war in Iraq
Tuesday December 10, 2002 [http://www.guardian.co.uk]
A little more than 30 years ago, the leaking of 7,000 pages of
Pentagon documents, which exposed an extraordinary catalogue of
lies and duplicity on the part of the US government, helped to
bring an end to the war in Vietnam. Daniel Ellsberg, a former
marine company commander, who had served in Vietnam, leaked the
documents, risking a life sentence to do so. Now he is finally
telling the whole story of how he became perhaps the most
important whistle-blower of the past half century.
It is a bright autumnal day in Berkeley, California, and
Ellsberg, now a sprightly 71, is having a rest day from a
cross-country tour to promote his memoirs, Secrets. It is his
account of how he, an analyst with the Rand Corporation, who had
worked in the Pentagon under defence secretary Robert McNamara
and for the state department in Vietnam, was finally driven by
his conscience to reveal how successive US governments had
stumbled into a war that cost more than a million Vietnamese and
55,000 American lives, and how successive presidents had lied to
the American people about the conflict's conduct and
consequences.
Ellsberg photocopied what were to become known as the Pentagon
papers, and then tried to persuade politicians to release them
and alert the country. When that failed, he gave them to the New
York Times. To ensure that the papers would all be distributed,
he went on the run, prompting what was described as "the largest
FBI manhunt since the Lindbergh kidnapping". When the FBI finally
caught up with him in June 1971, he was charged with 12 felonies
and faced 115 years in jail.
He might well still be in prison were it not for the almost
psychopathic desire of President Nixon and his team to extract
revenge: a burglary of Ellsberg's psychoanalyst's office was
authorised in the hope of finding information that might
discredit him or, when publicised, drive him to suicide. The
Watergate burglars, Gordon Liddy and Howard Hunt, carried it out.
A team of heavies was recruited to break Ellsberg's legs. His
phone was tapped. It also emerged, during his trial in 1973, that
the judge had earlier been offered the post of director of the
FBI, a job he coveted.
Once these plots became known, the judge had to abandon the trial
and acquit Ellsberg. The Pentagon papers also helped to so
discredit the war that they became one of the key factors in the
US's final withdrawal and Nixon's humiliating resignation.
Ellsberg became a counter-cultural hero.
Secrets recounts this story, filling in the many gaps that
remained at the time of the trial. It is also, in a way, a love
story about how he fell for his wife, Patricia Marx, and her
pivotal role in ensuring that the papers were leaked.
The Ellsbergs now live in a rambling, unpretentious home in
Berkeley, surrounded by buddhas and roses. Ellsberg has been
speaking so much that his voice is almost gone but he talks with
the same intensity that took him into the dock three decades ago.
He sees many parallels between then and now, with the country on
the brink of another war.
"One of the key differences is that the military now are clearly
against this, which was not the case with Vietnam. The military
hated the way Lyndon Johnson conducted the war but they wanted to
get into it. This military clearly does not want the war so
they're leaking. The reasons Bush has given are ridiculous -
democracy, give me a break."
He lists "oil, oil and oil" as the main reasons for the present
war plans. He also anticipates an "incident" that will be used as
a rationale for the first US strike, just as the Gulf of Tonkin
incident - a supposed attack on a US destroyer - precipitated
deeper US military action in Vietnam. "Bush will want to claim,
just as Johnson did, that he was immediately protecting American
troops. He will want to say 'I'm bombing because I have
intelligence that Americans are at immediate risk. They are
putting chemical warheads on missiles, we think.
I can't take the chance.'
"I believe Rumsfeld, Cheney and Wolfowitz are using our own
troops as bait. There will be deaths, and they know that."
Ellsberg has noted that there have been frequent leaks about the
war plans in recent weeks. "There is great dissent and that is
clearly the major reason for the leaking. It is clear that the
administration is filled with people who believe this is
reckless, unnecessary, foolish ... I am using every opportunity
to say to people in the government who are in the position that I
was then, and who know that their president is lying us into a
wrongful and reckless war, to do what I wish I had done in
1964-65: to go to Congress and the press with documents and tell
the truth. That would be a risk but there are times when big
risks are worth that to save a lot of lives."
Ellsberg says that he doesn't like telling people to take risks
that he is not taking, which is why he is announcing that his
book contains some still unclassified secrets - one about a
dialogue between Johnson and the then Canadian prime minister,
Lester Pearson, in which nuclear war was discussed as an option
in Vietnam. He is challenging attorney general John Ashcroft to
prosecute him for breaking the law.
Ellsberg is understanding about how people in power are co-opted
into a system in which leaking becomes hard. "There is no set of
genes, no hypodermic injection you can take which makes you
immune to going along with cruel, indefensible policies that your
team and your boss and your president say is what they want to
do. I did it, but I don't think I was particularly corrupt for
doing that. I don't think there is any human who is incapable of
keeping their mouths shut about what they know is wrong."
Britain crops up periodically in the discussion. He is appalled
that we still have an Official Secrets Act: "It is an outrage.
I'd love an opportunity to go to England and testify to anyone on
my experience and break their law. You cannot be a democracy in
foreign affairs and have the amount of secrecy unchallenged that
we have in America or you have in Britain. It's not just a joke,
it's something that has to be resisted and changed." The book has
revealing vignettes of Henry Kissinger and how he wanted to use
journalists to present him as a ladies' man.
Ironically, Kissinger had been a big admirer of Ellsberg's,
telling an audience of Rand personnel in 1968: "I have learned
more from Dan Ellsberg than from any other person in Vietnam."
This credibility, and the fact that Ellsberg was a
Harvard-educated former company commander in the Marine corps,
who had been under fire in Vietnam, was what made him so
dangerous.
The tapes he reprints of Nixon plotting to damage him is like
eavesdropping on a Mafia family dinner:
Nixon: Let's get the son-of-a-bitch into jail. Kissinger: We've
got to get him.
Nixon: Don't worry about his trial ... try him in the press. We
want to destroy him in the press ... Is that clear? Kissinger and
(attorney general) John Mitchell: Yes.
Since the 70s, Ellsberg has earned a living from lecturing and
writing, although anti-nuclear activism is his "top priority". He
has three children and five grandchildren and a bad back, but
shows no signs of slowing down. He has been arrested on many
occasions, protesting against US military actions.
The almost universally friendly reception of the book has
encouraged him. Senator and presidential contender John Kerry has
praised him for the courage "which undoubtedly saved American
lives in the battlefield". Actor Martin Sheen recommends the book
as "essential reading for any American who wants to understand
true patriotism". Yet had it not been for the Nixon team's
criminality, he says, his release date with good behaviour would
not have been until 2008.
However, Ellsberg expresses dread at what he fears is an
approaching war. "I don't want to test whether Iraqis will fight
in their own country for this tyrant, and I do not want to test
what Saddam will do if we really set out to kill him," he says.
"I can't think when I have felt that it was as ominous as this."
· Secrets by Daniel Ellsberg is published in the US by Viking.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
*****************************************************************
49 Iraq debate goes beyond facts
eastsidejournal.com -
[http://apmoneywire.ap.org/]
[U.S. Census Bureau Website]
2002-12-10 by Tom Wolfe
None of the important questions about Iraq can be answered with
facts.
But they are a starting point for thinking.
The Rev. Sharon Moe, senior pastor of the University Temple
United Methodist Church, brought an arsenal of handouts,
statistics, maps, color slides and personal observations to
Auburn United Methodist Church Sunday night, drawing on two
visits to Iraq this year, and a lifetime of asking big questions.
Her own views are fiercely anti-war, but she emphasizes personal
reflection over political ideology.
``My goal is to get people thinking,'' she explained later. ``I
am very careful to respect differences of opinion, and I try not
to put people on the spot.''
Even so, an evening of immersion in human catastrophe is an
ordeal. An estimated 500,000 Iraqi children have died from the
consequences of war -- famine, disease, pollution, birth defects
-- and thousands more are on the brink.
Moe wants people to think about that, and about depleted uranium,
leukemia, Gulf War syndrome, so-called collateral damage, our
dependency on oil, the cultural treasures of modern-day
Mesopotamia and the true meaning of patriotism.
At the same time Moe was speaking in Auburn, the Eastgate
Congregational United Church of Christ was hosting a community
forum in Bellevue. It lasted more than two hours.
I admire the 150 or so people who attended those sessions and
took up the challenge to learn more about Iraq.
It's a daunting task. And even when you know more, it's not
enough.
* We know that Saddam Hussein is a ruthless dictator. But we
don't know what level of threat he now poses outside his borders.
* We know that war is hell, but we don't know how many combatants
and civilians would die, how it would affect the economy or what
it would mean to history.
* We know we could conquer Iraq, but we don't know if that would
promote Mideast stability or provoke anti-American terrorism.
Our history with Iraq is also confusing.
Go back to Aug. 2, 1990, and we have the Iraqi invasion of
Kuwait, which started the current chain of events.
But go back just a few months more, and the picture changes. Go
back to January 1990, and you'll see President Bush signing a
presidential order promoting trade with Iraq. Go back to 1983 and
you'll see Donald Rumsfeld (now defense secretary; then a White
House envoy) shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, happy to have an
ally against fundamentalist Iran. You'll see Arkansas Gov. Bill
Clinton shaking hands with Iraqi Ambassador Nizar Hamdoon, happy
to be selling Arkansas-grown rice. Go back to 1981 and you'll see
the Reagan administration, happy with Iraq's invasion of Iran,
criticizing Israel for knocking out an Iraqi nuclear reactor.
Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator then, too, and working on
developing a nuclear bomb.
What do you think?
Not everyone can attend a two-hour forum on Iraq. If you'd like
to be part of the discussion, send an e-mail to
editorial.page@king countyjournal.com or send us a letter to the
editor.
We'll publish a selection of responses this weekend.
Tom Wolfe is editor of the Eastside Journal. His column runs
every Tuesday. Readers can reach him by phone 425-453-4230,
e-mail tom.wolfe@eastsidejournal.com or fax 425-635-0603.
Eastside Journal 1705 132nd Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98005-2251 Phone: 425-455-2222 Fax: 425-635-0602 All
materials Copyright © Horvitz Newspapers, Inc. Any questions? See
*****************************************************************
50 Judge Knocks GAO Out of Cheney Task Force Lawsuit
[http://ens-news.com/events.asp]
WASHINGTON, DC, December 9, 2002 (ENS) - The U.S. General
Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress, was
refused legal standing by a federal judge today in its attempt to
get records related to Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task
Force. Saying it has every legal right to see these records, the
GAO is considering an appeal of the decision.
[Bates] Federal District Judge John Bates
(Photo courtesy DC District Court) Judge John Bates, appointed to
the U.S. District Court in December 2001 by President George W.
Bush, ruled in Walker v Cheney that the GAO has no standing in
the case because it did not suffer any direct harm as a result of
the withholding of the documents.
Comptroller General of the United States David Walker, who heads
the GAO, said the agency might appeal the ruling. “We are very
disappointed with the judge’s decision," Walker said.
The agency is in the process of reviewing and analyzing the bases
and implications of Judge Bates' ruling. Walker said, "We will
consider whether or not to appeal after we have completed this
review and consulted with Congressional leadership on a
bi-partisan basis."
The GAO has the right and duty to examine the records of meetings
with energy stakeholders at the time when the Cheney Task Force
was formulating the National Energy Policy, the investigative
agency maintains.
[Walker] Comptroller General of the United States David Walker
(Photo courtesy GAO [http://www.gao.gov] ) GAO's legislation
"clearly authorizes it to perform a basic factual review of the
process the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) used
to develop the President's national energy strategy," the GAO
said today in a statement.
"Section 712(1), Title 31, U.S.C., authorizes GAO to investigate
"all matters related to the receipt, disbursement, and use of
public money," and there is no doubt that public money was used
to fund the activities of the NEPDG," the GAO stated.
Three other lawsuits are pending, including two by the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC), to force the White House to
turn over the information. One NRDC lawsuit awaits a decision by
Judge Paul Friedman which is expected any day.
NRDC sued the Energy Department under the Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) for records relating to the energy task force,
including minutes of meetings that occurred.
Although the Energy Department and other federal agencies have
released some information about which cabinet officials met with
regarding energy policy, the NRDC said today, the White House has
refused to provide similar information.
NRDC has argued that the records of Andrew Lundquist, the task
force executive director, and other key task force staff, all of
whom were Energy Department employees, must be disclosed under
FOIA.
[Cheney] Vice President Dick Cheney (Photo courtesy DOD
[http://www.dod.gov] ) "Judge Bates' decision to shield the
activities of Vice President Cheney's secretive energy task force
seems to be more about politics than the law," said NRDC attorney
Sharon Buccino.
The NRDC has also filed a freedom of information case against the
Department of Interior (DOI) for records related to the formation
and the implementation of the energy task force recommendations.
"DOI is already moving forward to expedite energy development on
public lands across the West, yet refuses to provide basic
information about the decisions the agency is making and who is
influencing them," the NRDC said today.
Two other civil organizations are using the courts to seek the
Energy Task Force records. In the case of Judicial Watch v.
National Energy Policy Development Group, the two organizations -
Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club - sued the Bush administration
for violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which promotes
open and balanced government decision making. Judge Emmett
Sullivan ordered discovery in this case, but the DC Circuit Court
stayed this decision on December 6, pending appeal.
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2002. All Rights
*****************************************************************
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this
material is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
*****************************************************************