***************************************************************** 12/10/02 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 10.320 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 China Vows to Press N. Korea on Nukes 2 Two US policies for 2 ?axis? states 3 Bush told to end nuclear double speak for India 4 UK power: energizing the nuclear option* 5 U.N. Arms Experts Step Up Iraq Inspections* 6 Iraq debate goes beyond facts 7 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites * 8 US: EchoStar, Hughes End Satellite Deal 9 U.S., N. Korea Disagree in Nuclear Talks 10 US: Expert sees future for nuclear power NUCLEAR REACTORS 11 US: TXU, inspectors to discuss Comanche reactor problems 12 US: Problems keep reactor at nuclear power plant closed 13 US: 'Extraterrestrial alien' invades nuclear plant* 14 Bulgarian Power Plant?s Fate Hangs in the Balance 15 US: Comanche Peak nuclear plant still down 16 US: Calvert Cliffs FONSI 17 US: Nuclear Plant Equipment Problems Worsening as Reactors Age 18 US: TVA offers Net site for children -- NUCLEAR SAFETY 19 US: Schumer, Clinton ask NRC to look at security 20 US: Detecting smuggled nuclear material 21 Bosnian Bombing AFTEREFFECTS 22 PLAYING CATCH-UP (health impacts from Bosnia) 23 US: Fact-finding phase of probe into train tunnel fire nears end 24 US: Construction accident sparks radiation concern 25 The UN releases a study that lends credence to health experts? cries NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 26 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing 27 US: NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste to Meet December 17 - 19 28 Editorial: Whistleblower probe was full of problems 29 US: Radioactive truck returning to Twin Falls 30 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing* 31 Prejudice against nuclear reprocessing must go: Chidambaram 32 State records on LES recruitment sought * 33 US: *Borough Council unanimously opposes landfill?s radiation monito NUCLEAR WEAPONS 34 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites 35 U.N. Teams Head Toward Iraq Uranium Mine 36 India to buy Russian submarines, a strategic bomber, and… 37 US: U.S. Sees Nuclear Deterrence Against WMD Attack* 38 Press freedom prize awarded to Russian reporter Grigory Pasko 39 Inspection teams in Iraq focus on 3 nuclear centers US DEPT. OF ENERGY 40 Government asks for extension in whistleblower suit 41 DOE to settle partial debt in land deal 42 Bechtel Jacobs cites failed work planning in radioactive release 43 ?Culture of Theft? Reported at U.S. Nuclear Lab 44 LANL Memo Stirs Fear of Reprisals* * 45 Energy Secretary Points to Government/Industry Partnerships to 46 Los Alamos Memo to Employees Stirs Fear 47 DOE to reserve 3,200 acres for conservation OTHER NUCLEAR 48 Portrait: Daniel Ellsberg 49 Iraq debate goes beyond facts 50 Judge Knocks GAO Out of Cheney Task Force Lawsuit ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 China Vows to Press N. Korea on Nukes Las Vegas SUN: December 09, 2002 By MATT KELLEY ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON- Chinese military officials, in their first high-level discussions with the Pentagon in years, said Monday they would try to pressure North Korea to drop its nuclear weapons programs, U.S. officials said. At the same time, the Chinese officials refused to rule out military force over Taiwan. Douglas Feith, the Pentagon's No. 3 official who headed the U.S. delegation at Monday's meeting in Washington, said the talks were useful and professional. Gen. Xiong Guangkai, deputy chief of the general staff of China's People's Liberation Army, led the delegation from Beijing. "They were real discussions. They were not just stilted set pieces," said Feith, undersecretary of defense for policy. "We came away with some additional understanding of the personalities on the other side and the ideas on the other side." While lunching on salmon, Chinese officials also presented a detailed proposal for military-to-military contacts with the United States, Feith said. He said it was too soon to offer a U.S. reactions to the proposals. The Pentagon wants the exchanges to be more than just port calls and photo opportunities, Feith said. "If the exchanges are structured properly, they will serve our interests, our common interests, providing insights, to reduce the possibility of mistakes, of misunderstanding," Feith said. The talks are the latest sign of warming in military relations between the two countries. A low point was April 2001, when a Chinese fighter jet collided with a U.S. Navy surveillance plane over the South China Sea. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was angered by China's accusation that the Navy's EP-3 surveillance violated Chinese sovereignty by landing at a Chinese airfield after the aerial collision. He also was unhappy that China detained the crew for 11 days and refused to let the United States repair and fly the plane off the airfield. The Chinese fighter jet crashed in the sea, killing the pilot. But relations have improved since then, with U.S. Navy ships resuming port calls in China last month and increasing contacts among higher level officials. The Chinese said they would try to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program, Feith said. The Chinese also insisted they no longer sell missile technology or equipment to North Korea, Feith said. "I don't know whether they're going to take concrete steps," Feith said, adding, "There is a common interest that exists between China and the United States ... to stop the North Korean nuclear program." The United States has been consulting with China and other countries in the region since Pyongyang's surprise admission in October that it has a secret uranium enrichment program to make nuclear weapons. Shipments of fuel oil to North Korea have ended. Under a 1994 agreement, North Korea had promised to end its nuclear weapons programs in exchange for two civilian nuclear power plants and the fuel oil aid. On Taiwan, the talks were not as harmonious. Feith said Pentagon officials objected to China's buildup of missiles across the Taiwan strait, while China responded with objections to U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. China and Taiwan split amid civil war in 1949, and China regards Taiwan as a renegade province. The United States does not have diplomatic ties with Taipei but is committed to defending the island from Chinese attack. In a biennial military report given to U.S. officials Monday, China said "it will not foreswear the use of force" to reunite Taiwan with the mainland. "China's armed forces will unswervingly defend the country's sovereignty and unity, and have the resolve as well as the capability to check any separatist act," said the report, titled "China's National Defense in 2002." On the Net: CIA factbook on China: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html [http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html] All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 2 Two US policies for 2 ?axis? states Monday, December 09, 2002 Expressindia Reuters * Seoul, December 8 * US Deputy Secretary of State, Richard Armitage?s today set out on a week-long tour of Asia for talks on Iraq and North Korea, two of three countries US President George W. Bush termed an ??axis of evil?? for suspicion of having weapons of mass destruction. The tour underscores contrasting US approaches towards Baghdad and Pyong Yang and their suspected nuclear arsenals and other banned weapons. Iraq?s declaration yesterday denying it has weapons of mass destruction is being analysed by a sceptical Washington, which has mustered an international coalition and vowed to force Baghdad to disarm if UN inspectors fail to do so. North Korea, which told the United States in October that it was secretly processing uranium for arms, has defiantly asserted its right to wield such weapons in the face of what it sees as nuclear threats from the United States and it?s 37,000 troops in South Korea. While the US-led pressure builds on Iraq, communist North Korea has been given a fresh chance to meet international demands that it abandon the uranium project, which violates key international non-proliferation treaties. Diplomatic sources said on Friday, the multinational organisation in charge of energy projects in North Korea has postponed a high-level meeting until January, delaying a joint decision on it?s nuclear arms programme. The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation (KEDO), was set up under a 1994 agreement which promised North Korea fuel oil and nuclear power stations in return for a freeze on a plutonium-based nuclear arms programme. KEDO suspended the oil shipments last month, and the meeting of the allied group would have discussed the future of two light-water reactors now under construction in North Korea. US officials say there will be no ??cookie-cutter approach?? to states posing seemingly similar menaces. However, analysts view North Korea?s geographic, political and military circumstances quite different from those of Iraq. © 2002: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights ***************************************************************** 3 Bush told to end nuclear double speak for India IANS[ WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2002 02:50:14 AM ] WASHINGTON: South Asia scholar Selig Harrison has taken up cudgels against the Bush administration for treating India unfairly in nuclear matters despite its record of honouring international non-proliferation norms. Urging the administration to give up its “obsolete policy that bans US civilian nuclear co-operation with New Delhi,” he said the time has now come to “end the nuclear double standard for India”, especially because it has, unlike Pakistan, refused to sell nuclear weapons know-how to any other state. On the other hand, Pakistan has exported uranium enrichment technology to North Korea in exchange for missiles, while India has adopted an unflinching policy of not sharing its nuke know-how with any other country, he said. “Despite India's consistent record of honouring international non-proliferation norms, the US clings to an increasingly obsolete policy that bans US civilian nuclear co-operation with New Delhi. “At the same time, Washington permits such co-operation with China, even though Beijing has transferred nuclear and missile technology to Pakistan and Iran,” Harrison said writing in the commentary page of the Los Angeles Times on Monday. Harrison said the ban is a relic of past decades when the US was pressing India not to become a nuclear power. Now that New Delhi and Islamabad have joined the nuclear club, Washington needs to reshape its policies. Strategically, Harrison said, US policy is now based on the implicit premise that Asia is more stable with India having a minimum nuclear deterrent than with China enjoying a nuclear monopoly. “It no longer makes sense to refuse US co-operation in making Indian civilian nuclear reactors safer and to bar US companies from selling civilian reactors to India, as they do to China.” Harrison was a correspondent in New Delhi for several years. He is currently a senior scholar of the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars and director of the Asia programme at the Centre for International Policy. Another issue of concern about the Bush administration policy is its refusal to help India ensure the safety of nuclear installations, Harrison pointed out. Taking up the case for India, he said that with 14 operating civilian nuclear reactors that produce electricity, and more on the way, India is anxious to avoid a nuclear disaster like the one at Chernobyl in Ukraine and has periodically asked the US to help in this regard. Last month, however, the Bush administration had opened the door slightly for a possible policy reappraisal, according to Harrison. — IANS Richard Meserve, chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will meet in January with Indian Atomic Energy Commission chairman Anil Kakodkar. The White House approved the visit to India after a bitter interagency struggle in which NPT “strict constructionists” tried to block the trip. A compromise was finally reached by permitting Meserve to have a “dialogue” but not to arrange actual transfers of nuclear safety technology, Harrison revealed in his article entitled “End the Nuclear Double Standard for India”. India branded the NPT as discriminatory and refused to sign. Now it wants to sign as a nuclear weapons state, but the US will not agree. The NPT does not bar its signatories from providing nuclear technology to non-signatories. But the US Congress went beyond the treaty with a law barring non-signatories from receiving US nuclear technology even if they accepted International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on its use. This legislation specifically bars the US from helping India make its reactors safer. To remedy matters, Harrison suggested that in return for access to US civilian nuclear technology, the US should impose two conditions, at minimum, on India. “First,” he said, “New Delhi would have to accept the international agency's safeguards not only on any new reactors purchased but also on all its existing civilian nuclear reactors, as it says it is ready to do. “Secondly, India would have to make some form of binding commitment not to export nuclear technology, formalising its de facto policy. “Thirdly, the administration should follow up the Meserve visit with a co-operative nuclear safety programme as the prelude to a broader dialogue designed to strengthen India's demonstrated commitment to non-proliferation.” Copyright ďż˝ 2002 Times Internet Limited. ***************************************************************** 4 UK power: energizing the nuclear option* *The UK nuclear industry has been buoyed by recent government comments.* December 10, 2002 12:50 PM GMT (Datamonitor) - Comments from the DTI have been seen as indicative of the government's support for the nuclear option. In fact, it's difficult to see that the government has much option - the cost of replacing the UK's nuclear generation capacity would be massive, with intolerable job losses and an over dependence on foreign gas. It's not great news for the taxpayer but should provide hope for private investors. At an atomic energy conference last week, Joan MacNaughton, the Director General of Energy at the Department of Trade and Industry, insisted that British Energy's problems are not symptomatic of wider problems in the UK nuclear industry. Her comments are likely to pre-empt a favorable review of the nuclear industry in the government's forthcoming energy white paper. Nuclear energy accounts for around one quarter of existing power generation capacity in the UK. It is not entirely surprising, therefore, that the government seems determined to find a solution to the continuing problems affecting companies in this industry. If the government were to sideline nuclear energy, it would first need to replace a significant amount of the country's existing generation capacity. While the private sector could be relied upon to fulfill some of this responsibility, government investment would have to be substantial. In addition, by replacing nuclear capacity with other forms of generation (mostly gas), the country may become overly dependent on foreign sources of this fuel, possibly from Russia or Algeria. This could lead to price instability and increase the UK's economic vulnerability. Finally, if the government were to give up its support for this industry, the employment fallout would be substantial, not just for power generators, but also nuclear reprocessers like BNFL. While this would partly be offset by new-build gas generation, it may not fully compensate for job losses in the nuclear sector. Whether the course that the government takes is in the best interests of the British taxpayer in the longer term is questionable. However, this intimation of government support will provide a much needed boost to private sector confidence in this beleaguered segment. You can download a FREE energy report at www.dmfreereports.com *Datamonitor's Digests let you receive more comments like this one, for free, direct to your inbox - and you also get a free Datamonitor report when you sign up. Click here for more information.* (c) 2002 Datamonitor. All rights reserved. Republication or © 2002 Datamonitor plc ***************************************************************** 5 U.N. Arms Experts Step Up Iraq Inspections* / Tue December 10, 2002 06:46 AM ET / By Huda Majeed Saleh AL-QAEM, Iraq (Reuters) - U.N. arms experts fanned out to inspect several new sites across Iraq Tuesday in the largest one-day operation since their hunt for alleged banned weapons resumed last month. A team of inspectors drove for five hours to examine a phosphate facility near the Syrian border 400 km (250 miles) northwest of Baghdad while other teams inspected four more suspected nuclear, biological and chemical sites. One team headed to an animals vaccine facility in the region of Abu Ghouraib, west of Baghdad. A second group went to Al-Furat Chemical Industries General Company, which is linked to the Ministry of Industry and Minerals. The company site is 41 miles south of Baghdad. A fourth team visited Ibn al-Haitham research facility in Wazireyah in a northern Baghdad suburb. A team later returned to Tuweitha nuclear site, 12 miles, south of Baghdad, their fourth inspection of the facility in one week. Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) have visited about 30 sites since their return to Iraq last month after a four year gap. Tuesday's operation covered the largest number of sites inspected on the same day. The al-Qaem site is also the furthest the inspectors had gone outside Baghdad. The number of experts had doubled with the arrival Sunday of 25 inspectors. Teams will be further beefed up with the arrival of around two dozen more experts later Tuesday. The United States is pressing weapons inspectors to be more aggressive in uncovering evidence of secret Iraqi arms. Iraq says it gave a full account of any past and current programs involving biological, chemical or nuclear weapons under a new U.N. resolution which demands full Iraqi cooperation with the weapons inspectors. It has denied having any such weapons but the United States says it has, and warned it is ready to take military action if necessary to disarm Baghdad. U.S. officials began analyzing a 12,000-page dossier detailing Iraq's weapons programs Monday. The United States received an early unedited copy of the Iraqi declaration after a deal was struck to override a U.N. Security Council decision to keep the report under wraps. PURELY FOR CIVILIAN USE At al-Qaem site, 11 inspectors in four-wheel-drive cars drove into the facility, which is run by the Ministry of Industry and Minerals, after the long journey from Baghdad. Accompanied by Iraqi officials, they were allowed into the guarded facility immediately. The site is located in a desert area few hundred meters away from the border with Syria. At al-Furat, a company official said after inspectors spent two hours checking its facilities that products there were all purely for civilian use. "We have nothing (banned) ... Everything was in front of them and there is no banned substances," Wahhab Abdul Wahhab told Reuters. Official Iraqi newspapers launched Tuesday more verbal attacks on the United States and Britain, accusing them of planning to attack Iraq despite Baghdad's hand over of a "complete and accurate" weapons declaration. Al-Iraq daily said the United States wanted to sabotage any attempts to reach a just solution for the issue of Iraq by lifting the crippling U.N. sanctions, imposed on Iraq for its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. "The clear truth is that Iraq has met its commitments and continues to deal with the inspection teams," al-Iraq said. "The report that it handed at the start of the week to the United Nations was comprehensive and detailed all its (weapons) programs," it said. "This is the true deed, not that croak of ravens getting ready to attack and whose dirty media beat the drums of war." ***************************************************************** 6 Iraq debate goes beyond facts Eastside Journal Local News 2002-12-10 by Tom Wolfe None of the important questions about Iraq can be answered with facts. But they are a starting point for thinking. The Rev. Sharon Moe, senior pastor of the University Temple United Methodist Church, brought an arsenal of handouts, statistics, maps, color slides and personal observations to Auburn United Methodist Church Sunday night, drawing on two visits to Iraq this year, and a lifetime of asking big questions. Her own views are fiercely anti-war, but she emphasizes personal reflection over political ideology. ``My goal is to get people thinking,'' she explained later. ``I am very careful to respect differences of opinion, and I try not to put people on the spot.'' Even so, an evening of immersion in human catastrophe is an ordeal. An estimated 500,000 Iraqi children have died from the consequences of war -- famine, disease, pollution, birth defects -- and thousands more are on the brink. Moe wants people to think about that, and about depleted uranium, leukemia, Gulf War syndrome, so-called collateral damage, our dependency on oil, the cultural treasures of modern-day Mesopotamia and the true meaning of patriotism. At the same time Moe was speaking in Auburn, the Eastgate Congregational United Church of Christ was hosting a community forum in Bellevue. It lasted more than two hours. I admire the 150 or so people who attended those sessions and took up the challenge to learn more about Iraq. It's a daunting task. And even when you know more, it's not enough. * We know that Saddam Hussein is a ruthless dictator. But we don't know what level of threat he now poses outside his borders. * We know that war is hell, but we don't know how many combatants and civilians would die, how it would affect the economy or what it would mean to history. * We know we could conquer Iraq, but we don't know if that would promote Mideast stability or provoke anti-American terrorism. Our history with Iraq is also confusing. Go back to Aug. 2, 1990, and we have the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, which started the current chain of events. But go back just a few months more, and the picture changes. Go back to January 1990, and you'll see President Bush signing a presidential order promoting trade with Iraq. Go back to 1983 and you'll see Donald Rumsfeld (now defense secretary; then a White House envoy) shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, happy to have an ally against fundamentalist Iran. You'll see Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton shaking hands with Iraqi Ambassador Nizar Hamdoon, happy to be selling Arkansas-grown rice. Go back to 1981 and you'll see the Reagan administration, happy with Iraq's invasion of Iran, criticizing Israel for knocking out an Iraqi nuclear reactor. Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator then, too, and working on developing a nuclear bomb. What do you think? Not everyone can attend a two-hour forum on Iraq. If you'd like to be part of the discussion, send an e-mail to editorial.page@king countyjournal.com or send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish a selection of responses this weekend. Tom Wolfe is editor of the Eastside Journal. His column runs every Tuesday. Readers can reach him by phone 425-453-4230, e-mail tom.wolfe@eastsidejournal.com or fax 425-635-0603. Eastside Journal 1705 132nd Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005-2251 Phone: 425-455-2222 Fax: 425-635-0602 ***************************************************************** 7 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites * *December 10, 2002* News Content TehranTimes Navigation /*By Our Staff Writer */ THERAN -- A high-ranking Israeli officer threatened that the Zionist regime would launch nuclear attack on Islamic holy sites in the Middle East, an Israeli newspaper said Sunday. In case Israel was attacked by states or groups, the Jewish state would respond by dropping nuclear bombs on Islamic cities such as Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia and Qom in Iran. The Haaretz newspaper quoted an unidentified high-ranking officer a s saying. It is an irony of our time Iraq has been suffering for a decade because it is accused of having some capabilities of unconventional weapons, while Israel announces that it possesses nuclear weapons, but there is not any international action against it. The officer, a guide in the Israeli military academy, was quoted as saying that Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear warheads along with their delivery systems, including long-range ballistic missiles, long-range bombers and nuclear submarines. Indeed, while is Iraq under the pressure, Israel is the only entity in the Middle East to possess a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, including a sizable nuclear arsenal. It is unfortunate that the United States, Israel's main protector, has always prevented any serious move to discuss Israel's weapons of mass destruction. But at the same time it has accused a number of other countries of trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction. It has put them under pressure on the basis of the very baseless accusations it has leveled against them. It is time the Islamic world in the first place and the international community too took serious action to contain Israel. The Zionist regime is an occupationist, expansionist entity. It must be contained, else the entire world will be in danger. ***************************************************************** 8 EchoStar, Hughes End Satellite Deal www.newsday.com December 10, 2002 An unruly stampede can be readily predicted when President George W. Bush seeks to fully exploit the victories that first gave him control of the executive branch and now have given him possession of Congress. Peevish commentators will argue that he is master of the world based on the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that effectively awarded him the presidency in 2000. A single vote was all that stood between Bush and illegitimacy and negated the nearly 600,000-vote plurality by which Albert Gore won the popular vote. That was then. Now, the recent election results have provoked the business community - and groups such as the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce - to wet their pants in anticipation of the conservative agenda they are in position to ram through. First out of the gate is likely to be an energy policy that should surprise no one who understands we have both a president and a vice president who are oilmen. They might as well be marinated in it. But Bush will earn his pay threading his way through a minefield of competing energy sources that include nuclear, oil, coal, natural gas and even, I suppose, the idealistic wind and solar enthusiasts who offer the best hope that the world will not be choked with greenhouse gases. The coal lobby already won a great victory when Bush took steps to permit older coal-fired plants to escape the requirement that they install costly anti-pollution devices. The nuclear people have a claim to their day in court because the new chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee is Sen. Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), a vigorous proponent of nuclear power. This could signal a new lease for an industry in danger of withering to insignificance. The nuclear lobby is demanding the industry be limited in its liability from catastrophic accidents. This is in response to fears that the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as easily could have involved airplanes crashing into nuclear power plants as into the World Trade Center. The environment is at once Bush's greatest liability and most serious weakness. His oil background virtually guarantees this. He will, of course, be under tremendous pressure to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to rampant exploration. This naturally will infuriate environmentalists. But Bush's other environmental problems already are so numerous he may figure that these lost votes are ones he simply will have to do without. I guess he has made the judgment that people who get hysterical about protecting the air and water, who want to hold on to endangered species and spare useless wetlands from development, are never going to be the kind of people he feels comfortable with. Meanwhile, timber interests are itching to have a go at more extensive logging in the nation's national forests. I suppose Bush's biggest problem will be just trying to listen to forces that made this fall's midterm elections the most expensive in history. Imagine the skills he'll need to avoid slighting those who think they've bought a piece of him. Copyright © 2002, Newsday, Inc. ***************************************************************** 9 U.S., N. Korea Disagree in Nuclear Talks Tue Dec 10, 9:05 AM ET By JAE-SUK YOO, Associated Press Writer SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said Tuesday that Washington would seek a "diplomatic solution" to North Korea, however, reiterated its rejection of a U.N. watchdog's appeal to abandon its nuclear program and to accept foreign inspections. Armitage, who arrived in Seoul on Tuesday, discussed North Korea with President Kim Dae-jung, Foreign Minister Choi Sung-hong and Defense Minister Lee Jun. "In my meetings today, we reaffirmed our common interest in finding a diplomatic solution to North Korea's destabilizing pursuit of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction," Armitage said in a written statement. Washington and its allies are trying to pressure the North to give up its nuclear ambitions. Earlier Tuesday, North Korea's state-run news agency, KCNA, said the communist state rejects as "unilateral and biased" the International Atomic Energy Agency's resolution urging North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program and open its facilities to outside inspectors. North Korea cannot accept the Nov. 29 resolution because "the United States dubbed the (North) an 'axis of evil' and a target of the pre-emptive nuclear attack, creating a serious crisis," KCNA said. During the meetings in Seoul, Armitage also discussed Washington's possible war against Iraq. Domestic media reported that South Korea is willing to provide logistical support. The country dispatched engineering and medical units during the 1991 Gulf War. Armitage was scheduled to leave for China on Wednesday and to visit Australia later in the week. His visit comes amid rising anti-U.S. sentiment in South Korea over last month's U.S. military court acquittals of two U.S. soldiers whose armored vehicle hit and killed two Korean girls in an accident in June. Armitage again conveyed Washington's "deepest apology" for the deaths. President Bush had apologized, but that has failed to allay the growing anger. Past anti-U.S. protests involved small groups of activists, but current demonstrations are drawing thousands. Protesters demand that the two U.S. soldiers be retried in a South Korean court and that the 1966 Status of Forces Agreement, or SOFA — which covers American troops' legal status — be revised to give South Korea more jurisdictional power. South Korea is a close U.S. ally and hosts 37,000 U.S. troops. Most South Koreans tolerate or support the U.S. military presence, but accidents and crimes involving soldiers here have been a constant source of discontent. President Kim said Tuesday that current demonstrations should not be used as a platform for anti-Americanism and demands for the withdrawal of U.S. troops. "I am relieved that so far protesters only demand an apology by President Bush and a revision of SOFA, and that they are separating their demands from anti-Americanism and demands for the withdrawal of U.S. troops," Kim was quoted as saying by his office. Copyright © 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The ***************************************************************** 10 Expert sees future for nuclear power Oakland Tribune Online [http://www.oaklandtribune.com/] Last Updated: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 - By William Brand, STAFF WRITER SAN FRANCISCO -- Nuclear power -- more the butt of sick radiation jokes and cost-overrun complaints in recent decades than a prized source of energy -- still has a future in America, the former head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Monday. "Nuclear power has had a rough ride," said Shirley Ann Jackson, who headed the commission during the Clinton administration. "The last use permit for a nuclear power plant was issued in 1979, and the last nuclear plant went on line in 1996," she said. "And since 1979, more than 20 nuclear plants have closed, and more than 20 other proposed plants have been canceled. But nearly 20 percent of America's electricity is still produced by nuclear power." Much has happened since the Three Mile Island partial nuclear meltdown, Jackson said. "In the United States, the nuclear industry has had an enviable safety record." She predicted that in the next five to 10 years, electrical power primarily will be provided by fossil fuels, burning natural gas and coal. Currently, coal-burning generators provide half of America's electrical power. But a decade from now, nuclear power may well be the energy choice, Jackson said. Nuclear power does not contribute greenhouse gases or pollutants, she added. Ernest J. Moniz, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist, suggested the world may have little choice because of global warming. If one takes the general guideline that during the next century we have to emit no more greenhouse gases annually than we do today -- despite a large increase in the demand for energy -- then nuclear plants begin to look more attractive, Moniz said. However, during a morning discussion by scientists at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union, some problems associated with nuclear energy emerged, including plant security, disposal of nuclear waste and convincing a dubious public that the Three Mile Island and Chernobyl nuclear mishaps could not happen again. For example, a scientist cited the Department of Energy's own environmental impact report on the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste disposal site, approved this past summer by Congress. Once the site begins accepting nuclear waste, the report estimates it will require 3,215 train shipments and 1,079 truck shipments over 24 years to fill the first bore, 1,000 feet down in the mountain. There are now about 70,000 metric tons of nuclear waste at 131 locations in 39 states. That waste has been produced since the start of the nuclear power age. The biggest problem, said Jean L. Younker, senior principal scientist for Bechtel SAIC, will be lawsuits over the routes taken to haul nuclear waste and the site's safety. Bechtel represents several private utilities that want to ship their waste to Yucca Mountain. The Department of Energy notes that more than 2,700 shipments of nuclear waste have been made in the United States in the past 30 years without mishap. There has never been a release of radioactive material harmful to the public or environment, according to the agency. Jackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., pointed out there already is a resurgence in nuclear power. Nuclear plants were originally licensed for 40 years, but since 1998 plants have been receiving Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval to operate an additional 20 years. She said 10 have received renewal permits, 25 or more are waiting for a renewal permit, and 15 others have indicated they intend to ask for a permit to keep producing power, Jackson said. She said while nuclear power plants originally were very expensive, the older plants have paid off their costs and in the future will generate electricity quite cheaply -- half the cost of natural gas generation -- she said. ©1999-2002 by MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers ***************************************************************** 11 TXU, inspectors to discuss Comanche reactor problems Star Telegram | 12/10/2002 | By Neil Strassman Star-Telegram Staff Writer A reactor at the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant that was shut down in September because of leaking and corroded tubing is having a tough time getting going again, officials said. The reactor -- which was shut down for 50 days to repair more than 660 corroded and cracked tubes and for refueling -- has been started and stopped twice since Nov. 15 and is under repair and out of service. "The reactor should be back in operation in a number of days," said TXU spokesman David Beshear. "The bottom line is safety, and we have systems in place that work correctly." TXU is scheduled to meet today at the plant with a Nuclear Regulatory Commission special inspection team that has investigated problems with the steam-generating tubes. "This will be a discussion of the team's preliminary findings and a look at what the company has been doing to address the problem," said Ken Clark, NRC spokesman. Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort Worth, went on-line in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two. The troubled reactor, Unit 1, resumed operation Nov. 15 but was shut down Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU officials said. The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod to drop into the reactor's core, Beshear said. The control rod is a safety measure that slows the nuclear reaction in the core. On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to repair an electric coil. That's when plant workers found that the coil failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the control rod, Beshear said. He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work is being done. Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said "such leaks are not uncommon" at the canopy seal by the control rod. "It's not a major safety problem," Johnson said. "It's an operating problem." None of the problems has posed a safety or public health risk, TXU and NRC officials said. Comanche Peak's second reactor, completed in 1993, remains unaffected and continues to operate. In early December, Comanche Peak workers found deposits of boric acid crystals around the leak, a potential concern because a boric acid buildup was blamed for extensive corrosion in the top of the Davis-Besse nuclear reactor near Toledo, Ohio. Similar corrosion was not found at Comanche peak, Johnson said. But the leaking and cracked steam-generating tubes, the subject of today's meeting with the NRC, are a longstanding problem at plants that were built with Westinghouse-engineered pressurized water reactors. The Westinghouse systems were installed in both commercial nuclear power plants in Texas, Comanche Peak and the South Texas Project. The thin tubes are made of a stainless steel alloy called Inconel 600. They have cracked and leaked within 10 years at some plants designed to last 40 years, according to NRC records. The tubes carry superheated, radioactive water from the reactor core to convert nonradioactive water into steam for electricity-generating turbines. The tube problem has led to at least 14 lawsuits against Westinghouse, all of which have been settled out of court with most court documents sealed. At least 19 steam-generating systems have been replaced at U.S. nuclear power plants for $100 million to $200 million per plant, records show. The South Texas project replaced its steam generators in the past two years. TXU is "continuing to evaluate replacement" of its steam generators at Comanche Peak, Beshear said. Neil Strassman, (817) 390-7657 strass@star-telegram.com [strass@star-telegram.com] ***************************************************************** 12 Problems keep reactor at nuclear power plant closed AP Wire | 12/10/2002 | [miamiherald.com - The miamiherald home page] Associated Press FORT WORTH, Texas - A reactor at a nuclear power plant that was shut down after leaking radioactive water is still out of service despite two attempts over the past month to get it running again. The reactor at the Comanche Peak plant was shut down in September to repair more than 660 corroded and cracked tubes and for refueling. "The reactor should be back in operation in a number of days," said TXU spokesman David Beshear. "The bottom line is safety, and we have systems in place that work correctly." TXU is scheduled to meet Tuesday at the plant with a Nuclear Regulatory Commission special inspection team that has investigated problems with the steam-generating tubes. "This will be a discussion of the team's preliminary findings and a look at what the company has been doing to address the problem," said Ken Clark, NRC spokesman. Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort Worth, went online in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two. The troubled reactor resumed operation Nov. 15 but was shut down Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU officials said. The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod to drop into the reactor's core, Beshear said. The control rod is a safety measure that slows the nuclear reaction in the core. On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to repair an electric coil. Plant workers found that the coil failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the control rod, Beshear said. He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work is being done. Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said "such leaks are not uncommon" at the canopy seal by the control rod. "It's not a major safety problem," Johnson said. "It's an operating problem." None of the problems has posed a safety or public health risk, TXU and NRC officials said, but the September incident prompted government scrutiny of the utility's plan for finding such leaks. [http://www.knightridderdigital.com ***************************************************************** 13 'Extraterrestrial alien' invades nuclear plant* , Daily Journal* *December 10, 2002* BRAIDWOOD -- A crazed Chicagoan, swearing to be an extraterrestrial alien, crashed his car through the gates of the Braidwood nuclear facility late Monday before speeding away only to be arrested for reckless driving in Wilmington minutes later. Khalil I. Ghandor, 29, was arrested by Wilmington officer Don Thomas at 11:37 p.m. after Ghandor allegedly ran a motorist off the road then barreled across the bridge on Baltimore Street with his lights off. Wilmington police Chief James Metta said Ghandor did not appear drunk and gave no indication of being connected to a terror cell. He was also cited by Braidwood police. Will County sheriff's police cited him for trespass. No injuries resulted. Metta said the intruder is alleged to have penetrated the parking area by crashing through closed gates, flashing past a plant checkpoint and then doing "donuts" in the parking lot. This web site and server is updated and maintained by The Daily Journal, Kankakee IL 60901 Copyright © 2002 The Daily Journal Publishing Co., L.L.C., All Rights Reserved. Please ***************************************************************** 14 Bulgarian Power Plant?s Fate Hangs in the Balance 10 December 2002 The Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) announced on 3 December that it is drafting an official demand to hold a national referendum on keeping open the country?s only nuclear power plant, Kozloduy. The government agreed in November to a European Union request to close units 3 and 4 of the plant in 2006 in exchange for a promise to allow the country into the EU in 2007. The EU considers the units unsafe because of a lack of containment, despite Sofia?s numerous claims that the Soviet-designed reactors have been upgraded and could run safely for up to another decade. ?We are watching a bunch of arrogant people who feel free to ignore the will of the nation and turn down all calls for real debate on the real issue,? said Rumen Ovcharov, deputy chairman of the BSP, when asked to comment on the leftists? decision. ?The BSP will hold fast in defending every Bulgarian national interest in the course of the accession process to the EU, the Kozloduy nuclear power plant issue in particular,? he said. According to the Bulgarian constitution, only the parliament can decide to hold a national referendum. If it decides to do so, the president must set the referendum date within one month. The six-unit Kozloduy nuclear plant provides 45 percent of Bulgaria?s electricity. The plant is located some 200 kilometers north of the capital, Sofia, on the Danube River near the Bulgarian-Romanian border. On 29 November, in an open vote, the parliament rejected two no-confidence motions filed by the leftist Coalition for Bulgaria (KB) and the rightist United Democratic Forces (ODS). The initiators both from the right and left say that the government?s promise to close Kozloduy?s units 3 and 4 in 2006, as required by the EU, was in violation of the Bulgarian parliament?s decision on the issue. ?If units 3 and 4 of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant are shut down in 2006, as required by the European Commission, Bulgaria will suffer a loss of $1 billion to $1.25 billion by 2020,? analyst Georgy Ganev, programming director for the Center for Liberal Strategies, told Novinite Online on 6 December. ?After the closure of the first and second reactors of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant, electricity prices will increase more than 12 percent during the first stage,? said Kuzma Kuzmanov of the Bulgarian Atomic Forum (Bulatom). According to Kuzmanov, electricity prices will be at least three times higher after the shutdown of the reactors. Kuzmanov says the Kozloduy units generate about 5 billion kilowatt hours annually, or about 12 percent of the total electricity generated in the country. Bulgarian Foreign Minister Solomon Passy defended the planned closures, saying that EU pre-accession financial aid for Bulgaria would amount to approximately $1.3 billion more than would be generated by the reactors. ?Holding a referendum is not realistic at present,? Passy said on 4 December, pointing out that referendums have not been held for more important issues, such as EU and NATO accession. ?From now on politicians must manfully take responsibility and not hide behind the decision of the people,? he said. ODS leader Nadezhda Mihailova said the party would not support the Socialists? request for a national referendum. ?I think this is an act of populism,? she said on 4 November. ?The choice between the European Union and the nuclear plant is irrelevant. Bulgaria needs a successful energy policy, and that can be maintained by the government, which understands what the Bulgarian national interests are,? said Mihailova. On 4 December the online news site Mediapool.bg published the final results of an Internet-based survey on the plant?s fate. According to the survey, only 26 percent of Bulgarian adults are aware that the dispute centers on the shutdown of the old reactors. Almost 20 percent of those surveyed mistakenly believe that the EU is demanding that the entire plant be shut down. Despite a general lack of awareness of the issue among the public, over 3,000 people joined in a rally in Sofia on 2 December to protest the closure of the old reactors. The rally was organized by the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (VMRO) and the Civil Committee on Defense of the Kozloduy Nuclear Plant. The protesters carried placards reading ?We want a referendum? and ?VMRO: Let?s defend the nuclear plant.? ?Bulgaria is neither economically nor technically prepared for the closure of the Kozloduy units,? Radicals Union deputy chairman and former nuclear plant director Danail Tafrov told the Bulgarian Telegraph Agency. ?Bulgaria can only lose if there is no transparency in our relations with the European Commission and, in particular, transparency in regard to the Kozloduy nuclear power plant,? Bulgarian President Georgy Parvanov told reporters in Stara Zagora on 30 November. ?Those who claim that the Kozloduy nuclear power plant?s units 3 and 4 should be closed down do not have any arguments to back up their stand. Bulgaria?s position is strong and we should find a way to defend it,? Parvanov said on 3 December in a meeting with nuclear power engineering experts. Parvanov said that there were consistent contradictions concerning the fate of the nuclear plant based on the findings of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Bulgaria?s aim is to prompt a peer review that will convince the EU that the country can keep units 3 and 4 running, he said, adding that he hoped the review would take into consideration the IAEA?s conclusions. Earlier, on 24 October, Parvanov had sent a letter to the leaders of EU member countries, as well as to the European Commission and the European Parliament, insisting on a peer review of the units in order to prove their operational safety. Parvanov?s letter quoted the National Assembly?s 2 October decision that said Bulgaria would not close down the two reactors before EU accession. Foreign Minister Passy said at the time that Parvanov?s letter might have intervened with Bulgarian diplomacy. According to Foreign Ministry spokesperson Luibomir Todorov, however, no one had exceeded his or her powers and or breached regulations. ?The government has a very clear concept of what is going on with Kozloduy units 3 and 4, and, considering that the EU has signaled clearly enough its readiness to conduct the peer review we have suggested, we continue to believe that the ministers who are directly or indirectly engaged in the negotiations are acting in the correct manner,? said Todorov. ?I believe we have wonderful relations with the president, and having differences on certain matters does not affect either the relations or the joint work,? said Passy, referring to the differences that have arisen between him and Parvanov on certain matters, including Kozloduy. --by Konstatin Vulkov /TOL/ article, please email us at react@tol.cz Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved. /Dec. 10, 2002, 7:33PM/ *Associated Press* GLEN ROSE - The public was never in danger after a leak at a North Texas nuclear reactor, and plant officials followed the proper procedures in shutting down the device, a Nuclear Regulatory Commission official said today. A reactor at TXU's Comanche Peak Steam Electric Plant was shut down in September after leaking low-level radioactive water, which did not escape from a protective containment area, officials said Tuesday. "In response to the indications they had, they took very good and appropriate action," said Dwight Chamberlain, director of the division of reactor safety at the NRC's Arlington office. The reactor was shut down when the water was leaking at a rate of about half a cup a minute. The plant's requirement for shutting down is a leak of 1 cup a minute; the NRC requires action at 2 cups a minute, TXU officials said. NRC officials on Tuesday presented a report from a special inspection team, which found that three incidents of human error led to the steam generator tube leak. The plant is unlikely to be fined or otherwise penalized, Chamberlain said. In two of the mistakes, TXU made the necessary corrections. The NRC still is examining the third incident, in which a plant employee reviewing computer data failed to report a marginal problem that later led to the leak, TXU officials said. "We've already retrained all of our analysts for looking at this data," said Lance Terry, a TXU senior vice president and principal nuclear officer. "You take a lesson learned and you retrain people." Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, about 50 miles southwest of Fort Worth, went online in 1990 with one reactor. It now has two. The reactor was shut down to repair more than 660 corroded and cracked tubes and for refueling. It remains out of service for unrelated problems despite two attempts over the past month to get it running again. Terry said the reactor could be operating again by later this week. The troubled reactor resumed operation Nov. 15 but was shut down Nov. 23 because of a potential valve problem, TXU officials said. The reactor was back in service two days later. But on Nov. 30, a blown fuse triggered a safety mechanism that caused a control rod to drop into the reactor's core, TXU spokesman David Beshear said. The control rod is a safety measure that slows the nuclear reaction in the core. On Dec. 3, the reactor was taken off-line again, this time to repair an electric coil. Plant workers found that the coil failure was caused by a leaky weld in a canopy seal at the control rod, Beshear said. He said that the weld has been repaired and that other minor work is being done. Bill Johnson, NRC branch chief responsible for overseeing reactor inspections at Comanche Peak and two other nuclear plants, said such leaks are not uncommon at the canopy seal by the control rod. ***************************************************************** 16 Calvert Cliffs FONSI FR Doc 02-31167 [Federal Register: December 10, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 237)] [Notices] [Page 75864-75865] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr10de02-56] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50-318] Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc., Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering issuance of an exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) part 50.44, 46 and Appendix K for Facility Operating License No. DPR-69, issued to Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc. (the licensee), for operation of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2 (Calvert Cliffs), located in Calvert County, Maryland. Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. Environmental Assessment Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action, as described in the licensee's application for exemption [[Page 75865]] dated July 12, 2002, would allow the licensee to use up to four lead fuel assemblies (LFAs) with an advanced cladding material, a zirconium- based alloy, that does not meet the definition of Zircaloy or ZIRLO, which are referred to in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.46(a)(1)(i). The LFAs are scheduled to be loaded into the Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 reactor core during the upcoming refueling outage and would remain in the core for two (2) cycles. The Need for the Proposed Action The proposed exemption from 10 CFR 50.44, 10 CFR 50.46, and Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50 is needed because these regulations specifically refer to light-water reactors containing fuel consisting of uranium oxide pellets enclosed in zircaloy or ZIRLO tubes. A new zirconium-based alloy cladding has been developed, which is not the same chemical composition as zircaloy or ZIRLO. Therefore, the licensee needs an exemption to insert up to four assemblies containing the new fuel cladding material into the Calvert Cliffs reactor core for test during operation. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that the proposed exemption will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety. The safety evaluation performed by Westinghouse demonstrates that the predicted chemical, mechanical and material performance of the Advance zirconium-based cladding is within that approved for Zircaloy-4 or ZIRLO under all anticipated operational occurrences and postulated accidents. Furthermore, the LFAs will be placed in non-limiting core locations. In the unlikely event that cladding failures occur in the LFAs, environmental impact would be minimal and is bounded by previous environmental impact statements. The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released off site, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. In regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). Denial of the application would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar. Alternative Use of Resources The action does not involve the use of any different resource than those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP) dated April 1973 or the Final Environmental Impact Statement for licence renewal for the CCNPP dated October 1999. Agencies and Persons Consulted On September 5, 2002, the staff consulted with the Maryland State official, Richard McLean of the Maryland Department of the Environment, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the licensee's letter dated July 17, 2002. Documents may be examined, and/ or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html] . Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov [pdr@nrc.gov] . Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of December 2002. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Guy S. Vissing, Acting Chief, Section 1, Project Directorate I, Division of Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 02-31167 Filed 12-9-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 17 Nuclear Plant Equipment Problems Worsening as Reactors Age [Newhouse News Service] [http://www.religionnews.com] By STEPHEN KOFF WASHINGTON -- Equipment breakdowns at nuclear power plants are not unusual. Pipes crack, break or clog, springing leaks with some regularity. Pumps stall or freeze up. Steam generator tubes burst. Steel components can get brittle from being bombarded with radioactivity. Nuclear industry officials acknowledge as much. But the problem is getting worse as the nation's inventory of nuclear reactors gets older. In addition, deregulation of electrical power is increasing competition, making the nuclear industry more reluctant to seek out problems that would require the tremendous expense of repair shutdowns. At the same time, federal budget squeezes are making it more difficult for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to monitor the industry. The result is growing concern about expensive, potentially dangerous nuclear plant failures. "Given plant aging and materials issues," there are likely to be other instances of cracks and leaks like those that led to the closing of the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant near Toledo, Ohio, earlier this year, according to a confidential analysis by the influential Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. "This type of event is likely to recur," the analysis said. Similarly, a research report compiled last year by engineers at several laboratories affiliated with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission warned, "The number of occurrences of age-related degradation has been increasing as nuclear power plants age." Aging equipment, whether in a nuclear plant or an automobile, can, of course, be repaired or replaced. But as many nuclear power plants approach the final 10 years of their 40-year operating licenses, they are undergoing fewer safety tests and inspections, according to engineers with close ties to the nuclear industry. That raises the likelihood that cracks and corrosion will not be caught in time, they say. The combination of the two trends -- fewer inspections and aging components -- sets the stage for compounding problems. "The utilities are trying to squeeze down their operation and maintenance costs," said Harold Ornstein, who until 2000 was a senior engineer and technical adviser for the NRC, where his investigations included Three Mile Island. He said utilities are pushing their staffs to keep the plants running -- at the expense of finding equipment problems that might require a shutdown. "The idea is to pass the (inspection) test; the idea is not to go out and tell you what the problem is," Ornstein said. The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, the industry's own research group, acknowledges the profit pressures. If a plant shuts down its reactor to inspect a potential problem, it has to purchase replacement power. The costs often run into hundreds of thousands of dollars a day. Pressure on staffs to keep a plant operating was a factor in all but one significant reactor problem since 1993, according to the confidential institute report. "Therefore, given today's competitive environment, pressure to continue operating may be a notable contributor to future significant events," the report said. The institute's analyses are considered among the most credible in the industry, and insurers use them to set rates. "There's a big move on to reduce costs, to take tests that were once done monthly and now make them quarterly, and things that used to be done quarterly are now done yearly and so on," said David Lochbaum, a nuclear safety engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Aging equipment, coupled with fewer safety checks and inspections, makes it more likely that something will break or fail or be degraded below the prescribed safety margins," Lochbaum said. Though the incident at FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co.'s Davis-Besse plant, where leaking boric acid ate a hole in the reactor lid, was considered extreme, nuclear power plants in South Carolina, Virginia, Arkansas, Florida and Michigan have seen signs of similar stress cracks or leaks in nozzles or welds, according to incident reports filed with the NRC. In other recent signs of aging: Last December, a backup pump designed to send water to steam generators at Union Electric Co.'s Callaway nuclear plant near Fulton, Mo., failed to do its job. A piece of foam from a storage tank seal had weakened with age and broken loose, lodging in the pump's intake valve during a routine test, NRC reports show. Had the other backup pumps been turned on, they too could have ingested loose foam and become clogged, presenting a potential cooling problem if the main systems failed. As had happened at Davis-Besse, the plant had ignored industry warnings and deferred inspections, according to an NRC review. In 2000, inspectors found cracks, one of them four inches long, in the weld of a giant coolant pipe at South Carolina Electric and Gas Co.'s Summer plant near Columbia, S.C., where boric acid had been leaking for an undetermined time. Workers failed to find the cracks during a previous inspection, discovering them only when the plant shut down for refueling. Had the cracks burst, a massive amount of radioactive coolant could have escaped. And last January, a jet pump inside a reactor vessel broke at Exelon Generating Co.'s Quad Cities plant near Moline, Ill., requiring a shutdown. Jet pumps increase the flow of water through the reactor core. Although the manufacturer had recommended replacing the jet pumps in the 1980s, Quad Cities never did. Nor had the plant inspected the part that broke -- because a manufacturer's guide did not identify it as among the components that could weaken with age. More than 30 percent of nuclear power plant equipment failures in recent years were at least partly a result of the equipment having aged, according to a presentation at a conference in 2000 by Steve Nichols, a senior evaluator in the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations' engineering department. Nichols said he could not comment for this article, citing institute policy. Researchers working in concert with the government have quietly voiced concerns for nearly a decade about the consequences of plant aging. "Effects of aging degradations, if they are not mitigated, will eventually lead to failures that could adversely affect plant safety and performance," said a 1993 study by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. So far, safety and backup systems at nuclear power plants have prevented life-threatening catastrophes in the United States -- a fact the industry and regulators cite to dispel fear and criticism. NRC officials note that for all the expense and negative publicity generated by the 1979 Three Mile Island partial meltdown, the public was not harmed. Officials say plants in the United States have so many backup and safety systems that the massive radiation release and deaths from the 1986 Chernobyl disaster could never happen here. "It's not the perfect system from the standpoint of `nothing will ever fail.' You will have failures. You will have things that leak. You will have cracks," said Alex Marion, director of engineering for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's lobbying and trade group. "The challenge, of course, is to have inspection and maintenance programs in place where you can identify these kinds of situations prior to having a serious problem at a plant." "I think what the public ought to feel good about," said Stephen Floyd, the Nuclear Energy Institute's senior director of regulatory reform, "is the defense in depth that's built into the plants. Not everything breaks at the same time, fortunately." NRC officials say the number of serious incidents at nuclear power plants has steadily fallen, one reason the agency lets power plants operate longer without shutting down for inspections or repairs. The agency periodically issues warnings for parts known to fail or crack -- including the nozzles that guide nuclear fuel rods, which in the case of Davis-Besse had been leaking boric acid for years. Before it will give a plant permission to operate beyond its initial 40-year license, the NRC requires a thorough inspection that covers passive components such as buried pipes. Many of the nation's 103 operating plants are expected to go through a relicensing inspection in the next decade. But it's no guarantee. In the case of Duke Energy Corp.'s Oconee nuclear plant near Greenville, S.C. -- a relicensing front-runner -- cracks were not noticed when it underwent, and passed, an extensive inspection to renew its license for an additional 20 years. After the NRC granted the renewal, the cracks appeared. Critics say that while the number of serious incidents is down, that trend is likely to reverse, turning higher simply as a function of age. Still, industry defenders say, the problem at Davis-Besse was not so much a failure of aging equipment, but rather of FirstEnergy to adequately investigate what it should have known was a potential problem. "Safety culture includes a good questioning attitude on the part of the plant personnel," said George Apostolakis, a nuclear engineering professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and chairman of an NRC committee that advises regulators on reactor safeguards. "There were several indications (of problems) there that people didn't seem to interpret correctly." But the NRC doesn't hold itself blameless. A "lessons learned" task force it assembled to assess the Davis-Besse incident concluded among other things that the agency, beset with staffing and "resource allocation" issues, had too few inspectors at the plant and "missed several opportunities" to find the problem. (Stephen Koff is Washington bureau chief for The Plain Dealer of Cleveland. He can be contacted at [skoff@plaind.com] .) ***************************************************************** 18 TVA offers Net site for children -- The Oak Ridger Online -- State News -- 12:01 p.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 The Associated Press KNOXVILLE -- The Tennessee Valley Authority hopes to reach younger residents of the Tennessee Valley with an Internet site created especially for children. The interactive site, http://www.tvakids.com, offers graphics and colorful text geared to fourth- through eighth-graders, along with lesson plans for teachers and field trip information. "The addition of the Web site devoted to children helps TVA reach our future stakeholders across the Tennessee Valley," TVA Chairman Glenn McCullough said. "Tvakids.com provides children and educators with helpful information about the mission of TVA, the importance of our work and the history that brought us here." The site covers TVA's multiple roles as the country's largest public power producer -- through nuclear power, fossil fuel and hydroelectric generation -- and manager of the country's fifth-longest river system with responsibilities ranging from flood control to recreation. TVA supplies electricity to 8.3 million people through 158 distributors in Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. [http://www.oakridger.com] All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger ***************************************************************** 19 Schumer, Clinton ask NRC to look at security By JIM FITZGERALD Associated Press Writer December 10, 2002, 5:30 PM EST WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. -- Sen. Charles Schumer said Tuesday that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should immediately review security at the Indian Point nuclear power plants, which he suggested has "more holes than Swiss cheese." Sen. Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, said she would reintroduce a bill that would assign a federal security coordinator to every sensitive nuclear plant in the country. Also Tuesday, Rep. Sue Kelly asked the new federal Department of Homeland Security to investigate Indian Point security and Westchester County Executive Andrew Spano called on the federal government to take over security duties at nuclear plants. The politicians were responding to a report that only 19 percent of the security officers at Indian Point 2 who were questioned after the 2001 terrorist attack said they could adequately defend the plant. "When it comes to nuclear security, we expect the highest safety and security standards to be met," Schumer said. "The NRC needs to step up to the plate and launch a vigorous review so that we can accurately assess what is going on at the plant once and for all." In a letter to NRC Chairman Richard Meserve, Schumer, a Democrat, said he was also troubled by the report's suggestion that mock attacks on Indian Point were manipulated to make sure they would not be successful. Neil Sheehan, an NRC spokesman, said that Schumer's letter had not been received but that the commission is "pretty satisfied that the security they have at the plant is capable of repelling an attack." Guards "have to meet pretty strong requirements and they have to requalify each year," Sheehan said. "If they can't measure up, they're not allowed to be on the job." Kelly, a Republican whose district includes Indian Point, told Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge, "The residents of this community must know that every precaution is being taken to protect Indian Point and any weakness in plant security must be addressed immediately." Spano, a Democrat, said the federal government should take over security at nuclear plants just as it has at airports. "If the federal government believes that airports are a potential terrorist target and in need of federal security, it is only logical that nuclear power plants are in even greater need of a federal security force," he said. The county executives of Rockland, Putnam and Orange counties, all within 10 miles of Indian Point, endorsed Spano's proposal. The Senate Environmental Committee approved a measure last year to assign a federal security coordinator to plants like Indian Point, but the bill did not come to a Senate vote. Clinton, D-N.Y., said she would reintroduce it. "We know that terrorists turned airplanes into missiles," she said. "We don't want them to turn power plants into nuclear weapons." Clinton also gave the NRC until Jan. 15 to explain what it is doing to correct security flaws. The report on security, which was commissioned by Entergy Corp. soon after it purchased Indian Point 2, is a year old but was made public this week. Entergy spokesman Jim Steets said many of the security concerns raised in the report had been resolved. Another Entergy spokesman, Larry Gottlieb, said Tuesday that giving more power to the private security force at Indian Point would be more constructive than turning the job over to the federal government. He said eliminating some "red tape at the state level," including restrictions on what guns the private force can carry, would strengthen security. Copyright © 2002, The Associated Press Newsday.com ***************************************************************** 20 Detecting smuggled nuclear material By Elaine Shannon Monday, December 9, 2002 Posted: 5:43 PM EST (2243 GMT) *How concerned is the government that a terrorist could smuggle nuclear material into the U.S.?* Concerned enough that the U.S. Customs Service is quietly installing new technology to better detect radiation at mail facilities, airports, seaports, rail yards and across the U.S. border. The new "radiation-portal-detection systems," costing $100,000 to $150,000 apiece, will supplement current technology, which consists of radiation "pagers" worn on the belts of customs personnel. Containers and vehicles will pass through the devices, which can pick up a wider variety of radioactive emissions than the pagers, from weapons-grade plutonium to medical waste that could be used as shrapnel in a "dirty bomb." And unlike the pagers, which only check containers singled out for inspection, the new portal devices will be routinely applied to all cargo, not just the high-risk kind. Customs is installing the devices at the exit gates of the nation's major seaports and at key traffic choke points, such as international bridges, tunnels, rail crossings and U.S. Postal and private parcel-shipping facilities. One prototype has already been deployed at a busy commercial crossing along the U.S.-Canadian border. More will follow--but to foil terrorists, Customs isn't advertising where or when. And no photos are permitted. *© 2002 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.* ***************************************************************** 21 Bosnian Bombing AFTEREFFECTS TOL home During NATO?s 1994 and 1995 bombings of Bosnian Serb positions around Sarajevo, NATO aircraft used munitions containing depleted uranium, a slightly radioactive heavy metal that is effective in piercing armor. Most of those bombs were fired in Hadzici. In one day in October 1995 alone, NATO planes fired 300 projectiles into the Sarajevo suburb. According to the Bosnian government, NATO forces fired some 10,800 rounds of 30mm armor-piercing projectiles during the war. Under the November 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement, some Sarajevo suburbs held by Serbs during the war came under the control of the mostly Bosniak and Bosnian Croat federation entity of Bosnia. One of those suburbs was Hadzici. Most of the approximately 30,000 Bosnian Serbs who lived there fled their homes and moved as refugees to other parts of the Republika Srpska entity of Bosnia and to Yugoslavia. Some 5,000 civilians from Hadzici fled to Bratunac, in eastern Republika Srpska. Medical analysis conducted by the local Institute for Health in 1998 showed that the mortality of Hadzici refugees was double the mortality rate for the rest of Bratunac?s residents. The study?s author, Dr. Slavica Jovanovic, told the SRNA news agency that she has no doubt that depleted uranium is responsible for the increased death rate of those people. ?We can say that the mortality rate of the refugee population is greater because of high stress, poor nutrition, and bad living conditions. But we were shocked to discover that deaths among Hadzici?s refugees are much more numerous than [among] other [refugees],? Jovanovic told SRNA. She blamed those deaths on the fact that the refugees from Hadzici were exposed to radiation because they lived close to the bombed locations. In her report, Jovanovic wrote that since the end of the war, 25 percent of wartime Hadzici residents have died of various cancers, tumors, and heart attacks. In Bratunac alone in the last four years, 500 of the 5,000 Hadzici refugees have died. One Hadzici refugee dies every three to four days, and every second one dies from cancer. Jovanovic said that she could not say for sure how many Hadzici refugees have cancer because many do not check themselves into hospitals since they cannot afford medical treatment. The doctor said she is hoping that the international community will step in and find some way to examine the town?s refugee population and help provide treatment. After the UNEP report was released, the Republika Srpska army evacuated soldiers from its barracks in Han-Pijesak. Officials say that organized medical exams will soon begin for soldiers who were in the barracks during the past seven years. At the same time, medical workers from the federation entity are also sending out warnings to people still living in Hadzici--but they are expanding their warning to the general public, which they fear could also be affected by the presence of depleted uranium. Federation health officials say they are also worried that that radiation has caused an increase in the number of diseases such as cancers--especially leukemia--tumors, cerebral palsy, and others. After the reintegration of Hadzici into the federation entity, prewar Bosniak and Croat workers began cleaning out the munitions warehouse and tank-repair facility, removing more than 1,000 truckloads of garbage and munitions Now those workers fear they too have been contaminated. Unfortunately, they will have to wait to find out. Workers have begun undergoing medical examinations, but the results will not be available until April 2003. What?s more, despite UNEP warnings to immediately evacuate all workers because of danger of inhaling depleted uranium dust, some workers from Hadzici are still on duty. ?Believe me, I am very afraid. But if I have been inhaling radiation for the past seven years, I can do it until they publish the final results,? Zijad Fazlic, director of the Hadzici tank-repair facility, told TOL on November 24. ?All we can do now is to wait for the results. I don?t know what we are going to do, but if I had known this, I would never have come here to work. Families of workers also live here,? he said. Soon after the UNEP report was published, federation medical officials started to speculate that it is possible that depleted uranium is the cause for the shocking jump in cases of leukemia in children. ?It has not yet been proven, but we cannot see anything else except uranium,? Edo Hasanbegovic, director of the ontological department in Sarajevo?s Kosevo clinic, told the daily /Oslobodjenje/ on 21 November. Hasanbegovic said that research is set to begin soon to find out whether a connection can be made between the increase in diseases and depleted uranium. But he said he is certain that depleted uranium is one of the elements that causes leukemia in Bosnia. ?That we can claim without medical research. Every year we have a 50 percent to 70 percent increase in the number of new underage patients,? said Hasanbegovic. Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved. Lejla Saracevic, chief of radiobiology at Sarajevo University, told TOL on 29 November that before the depleted uranium affair was made known to the public, local experts had asked the government to allow them to conduct research in potentially contaminated areas. The government, however, refused, saying there was insufficient money in the budget for such research--research Saracevic said costs little. Saracevic said that once the most critical locations have been decontaminated, it is necessary to find out how much of the rest of the region is radioactive. ?It has been a long time. In seven years the uranium has migrated into the ground and through the water. It is very possible that it now exists in our vegetation and possibly in our food. Our priority is to check that now,? she said. Before the war in Bosnia, the annual number of new cases of children with leukemia was never greater than 13. Since the end of the war, that number has grown every year: Last year it was 26. The situation is the same with other cancers: Every year the number grows. And almost 80 percent of those new cases are coming from areas that were exposed to the radiation of depleted uranium--areas that were bombed during the war. The so-called Balkan Syndrome affair first aroused attention in early 2001, when Italian media published reports that one Italian soldier who had served in Bosnia had died of leukemia and that five more were very ill. The Italian media blamed the sicknesses on NATO?s use of depleted uranium in its weapons. At the time, all governments denied that NATO was using uranium-tipped munitions. Nonetheless, medical examinations of soldiers were promptly begun, with many being diagnosed with leukemia and other forms of cancer. ***************************************************************** 24 Construction accident sparks radiation concern stltoday.com By Bill Smith Of the Post-Dispatch 12/09/2002 05:00 PM A bulldozer struck a piece of buried monitoring equipment at a downtown construction site Tuesday, releasing a small amount of radioactive material and forcing police to divert traffic away from the area for about 15 minutes. "There is no danger to the public at all," said Dennis Jenkerson, St. Louis Fire Department batallion chief and head of the department's hazardous materials team. "It is all contained." On a scale of 1 to 10, Jenkerson called the severity of the accident a 1. The construction site is at the southwest corner of Tucker Boulevard and Chouteau. Jenkerson said the small device was buried about a foot underground and is used to measure soil density and moisture. He declined to identify the construction company involved. "We have to get to within three feet to get any reading at all," Jenkerson said of the damaged device. */For more information, check back with STLtoday.com or read Wednesday's Post-Dispatch./* ***************************************************************** 25 The UN releases a study that lends credence to health experts? cries that NATO?s wartime uranium-tipped weapons have left behind a deadly, cancerous legacy./ TOL home by Anes Alic and Dragan Stanimirovic <#author> SARAJEVO and BANJA LUKA, Bosnia and Herzegovina--After two years of silence, Balkan Syndrome--better known as the depleted uranium affair--is getting its due attention. The United Nations Environmental Protection Agency (UNEP) in November confirmed the dangerous presence of depleted uranium in areas of Bosnia bombed by NATO aircraft in 1994 and 1995, which Bosnian officials say has led to a shocking increase in cancer-related deaths. UN experts confirmed the discovery of two locations containing a high level of radiation from depleted uranium from NATO bombings: the Sarajevo suburb of Hadzici, where a munitions warehouse and a tank-repair facility are located, and a Bosnian Serb army barracks in Han-Pijesak, also near Sarajevo. Investigators discovered uranium materials and dust inside the buildings. The UNEP task force says that depleted uranium can create an increase in uranium concentration 100 times the natural levels contained in groundwater. Upon the release of the November UN expert study on depleted uranium, health officials from Republika Srpska confirmed that uranium has indeed caused many civilian deaths in those two regions. Health officials say that civilian deaths in those regions are double what they are in other, unaffected regions. Earlier this year, the Bosnian government invited 17 international experts to investigate rumors that depleted uranium is still present in the environment and may be adversely affecting the health not only of the local population but also of international peacekeepers stationed in Bosnia. The team of experts investigated 14 separate locations over a one-month period, finding traces of radiation in three places. Investigators were not able to examine eight other locations--four small towns near Sarajevo and four others in eastern Bosnia--deemed to be too risky due to the presence of land mines. Pekka Haavisto, who heads the UNEP task force, told the daily Oslobodjenje: ?We are concerned about the situation at the Hadzici tank-repair facility and the Han-Pijesak barracks and the health condition of the citizens.? Haavisto said that after being analyzed in Western European laboratories, the final results would be released in March 2003. Recent years have brought growing concern among experts that shrapnel from depleted uranium-tipped weapons from could cause cancer or other radiation-related problems. According to health experts, dust particles from depleted uranium could be inhaled, or the substance could leach into the ground and the water supply. "Balkan Syndrome Resurrected" Previous page 1 2 3 Copyright © 2002 /Transitions Online/. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 26 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing Las Vegas SUN: December 10, 2002 ASSOCIATED PRESS LAS VEGAS (AP) - Nevada's nuclear projects agency chief is urging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to delay a scheduled transportation briefing until the state delivers its views about risks in shipping high-level nuclear waste. But officials with the NRC's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste said it was unlikely the agenda for next week's meeting would change. Bob Loux, the state's top appointed official opposing the Yucca Mountain nuclear dump, also asked the federal nuclear regulatory agency to give Nevada a "substantive" role in testing casks designed to haul nuclear waste by truck and rail to the desert 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. After complaining that the state was left out of a two-day government and industry workshop last month, Loux accepted an offer to present the state's research to the federal science advisory board in coming months. He asked the five-member science panel to postpone its Dec. 18 transportation briefing before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Loux said in a letter that the delay would help "assure that the commission has the benefit of a more complete and balanced picture of spent fuel and high level waste transportation." Committee associate director Sher Bahadur said the advisers will be presenting observations, not recommendations, during their annual meeting with the five Nuclear Regulatory Commission members. The advisers also are scheduled to discuss the regulatory panel's Yucca Mountain review plan, the durability of nuclear waste containers, repository risk factors and volcanic issues, Bahadur said. Loux also said in a Monday letter to NRC chairman Richard Meserve that Nevada has a stake in ensuring that the casks used to transport nuclear material to Yucca Mountain can withstand accidents, terrorist acts or sabotage. He noted that New Mexico and other states participated in testing a container used to ship mixed nuclear waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M. Loux said the NRC has yet to release its draft protocol for cask testing and has not rescheduled public meetings that were to be held in Nevada last summer. The advisory committee is composed of scientists who weigh technical issues in the planned development of a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. The committee passes its advice to NRC commissioners who would review an Energy Department license application to build and run the dump. Advisory panel chairman George Hornberger denied Nevada was snubbed at last month's transportation workshop. He said the session was designed to focus on "generic" issues, not Yucca Mountain. All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 27 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste to Meet December 17 - 19 in Rockville, Maryland NRC: News Release - 2002-142 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov [opa@nrc.gov] www.nrc.gov No. 02-142 December 10, 2002 NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE TO MEET DECEMBER 17 - 19 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Printable Version [PDF Icon] The Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has scheduled a meeting on December 17 - 19 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other issues, staff analyses for understanding the performance of the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and an examination of the NRCs nuclear waste safety research and technical assistance programs. Committee members also will meet with NRC Commissioners to discuss a number of waste-related topics. The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agencys Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, except for the session with the NRC Commissioners, which will be held in the Commissioners Conference Room of the agencys One White Flint North building, at 11555 Rockville Pike. The ACNW meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. the first day, 8:30 a.m. on the second day, and 8 a.m. the final day. A complete agenda is attached. For additional information or schedule changes, please contact Howard Larson at 301-415-6805. ACNW Meeting Agenda TUESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2002, CONFERENCE ROOM 2B3, TWO WHITE FLINT NORTH 10:30 - 10:40 P.M. Opening Statement The Chairman will open the meeting with brief opening remarks, outline the topics to be discussed, and indicate several items of interest. 10:40 - 12:15 P.M. Staff Analyses for Understanding Repository Performance The Committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff on its analyses on the use of risk information for the proposed Yucca Mountain repository. 12:15 - 1:30 P.M. ***LUNCH*** 1:30 - 3:30 P.M. Preparation of ACNW Reports The Committee will discuss proposed reports on the following topics: Staff Analyses for Understanding Repository Performance Conclusions Regarding the Safety of Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Trip Report: October Visit to Swedish Waste Management Facilities and Participation in Berlin Quadripartite Meeting 3:30 - 3:45 P.M. ***BREAK*** 3:45 - 6:00 P.M. Preparation for Meeting with the NRC Commissioners The next meeting with the NRC Commissioners is scheduled to be held on December 18 at 9:30 a.m. in the Commissioners Conference Room, One White Flint North. The Committee will review its proposed presentations. WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18 8:30 - 8:35 A.M. Opening Statement The Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of todays sessions. 8:35 - 9:10 A.M. Discussion of Topics for Meeting with the NRC Commissioners Discussion of topics scheduled for the ACNW meeting with the NRC Commissioners at 9:30 a.m. 9:10 - 9:30 A.M. ***BREAK*** 9:30 - 11:30 A.M. Meeting with the NRC Commissioners The Committee will meet with the NRC Commissioners in the Commissioners Conference Room, One White Flint North to discuss the following: HLW Program Risk Insights Initiative Yucca Mountain Review Plan Spent Fuel Transportation Igneous Activity at Yucca Mountain Container Life and Source Term KTI 11:30 - 1:00 P.M. ***LUNCH*** 1:00 - 3:30 P.M. NRC Nuclear Waste Safety Research and Technical Assistance Programs The Committee will hear from representatives of the NRC staff and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses on the NRCs Waste Safety Technical Assistance and Research programs. 3:30 - 3:45 P.M. ***BREAK*** 3:45 - 6:00 P.M. Preparation of ACNW Reports The Committee will discuss proposed reports listed under a previous item. THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19 8:00 - 8:05 A.M. Opening Statement by the ACNW Chairman The Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of todays sessions. 8:05 - 10:45 A.M. ACNW Action Plan The Committee members will discuss the ACNW 2002/2003 Action Plan and outline plans for sessions to assess Committee performance and update its priorities. 10:45 - 11:00 A.M. Miscellaneous The Committee will discuss matters related to the conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues that were not completed during previous meetings, as time and availability of information permit. 11:00 A.M. Adjourn 139th Meeting Tuesday, December 10, 2002 ***************************************************************** 28 Editorial: Whistleblower probe was full of problems Las Vegas SUN: December 10, 2002 In May 2001 the Energy Department hired the Morgan Lewis law firm to investigate whistleblower allegations and personnel disputes involving the quality assurance program at the Yucca Mountain project. James Mattimoe, the whistleblower who said the department mishandled quality assurance concerns raised by project employees, was fired after a Morgan Lewis report claimed that it was actually Mattimoe who abused his authority, a finding he disputes. Ultimately the Labor Department sided with Mattimoe and found that he was fired unfairly. But there's much more to the story. Morgan Lewis previously had represented nuclear power industry interests. And just 18 days after its report against Mattimoe was issued, the law firm registered as a lobbyist for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's top trade association, to push Congress to pass legislation in 2002 designating Yucca Mountain as the nation's nuclear waste dump. The Energy Department's selection of Morgan Lewis -- and the firm's subsequent findings against Mattimoe -- should not be too shocking for a department that conducted a one-sided investigation into Yucca Mountain's suitability, a sham review that favored the nuclear power industry. Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., is right to call for an Office of Government Ethics investigation to probe conflict-of-interest issues involving the hiring of Morgan Harris. It's a shame that Congress wasn't aware of these facts before it voted earlier this year on Yucca Mountain's fate. All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 29 Radioactive truck returning to Twin Falls Brigham Young University - Idaho Scroll TWIN FALLS, Idaho (AP) — The U.S. Department of Energy needs state regulatory approval before it opens a contaminated nuclear waste shipment returned to Idaho in August. The DOE does not have a facility in Idaho or New Mexico with permits to deal with shipments of mixed radioactive and other hazardous waste in containers that become contaminated during transport. The shipment was going to New Mexico for permanent storage in an underground salt bed. But it was sent back to Idaho because radioactivity was detected in the innermost compartment of the container. The container was hit by a drunken driver just 23 miles short of its destination, but it is unknown if that accident caused the contamination deep inside the vessel. DOE officials said they found no evidence of a radiation release into the environment and the cask was not damaged. Now the DOE wants a 120-day waste storage variance from the state so the shipment can be repackaged and examined for the cause of the contamination. The work would be done at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory’s Test Area North, said Brian Monson, with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality in Boise. The Department of Environmental Quality will likely require the DOE to come up with a plan in case this happens again, Monson said. The container holds fourteen 55-gallon drums of mixed waste, including plutonium-contaminated trash such as lab coats, and plastic covers that also are tainted by substances such as cleaning solvents. ***************************************************************** 30 Nevada wants larger role in nuclear cask testing* RENO GAZETTE-JOURNAL Associated Press 12/10/2002 11:15 am Nevada's nuclear projects agency chief is urging the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to delay a scheduled transportation briefing until the state delivers its views about risks in shipping high-level nuclear waste. But officials with the NRC's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste said it was unlikely the agenda for next week's meeting would change. Bob Loux, the state's top appointed official opposing the Yucca Mountain nuclear dump, also asked the federal nuclear regulatory agency to give Nevada a"substantive"role in testing casks designed to haul nuclear waste by truck and rail to the desert 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. After complaining that the state was left out of a two-day government and industry workshop last month, Loux accepted an offer to present the state's research to the federal science advisory board in coming months. He asked the five-member science panel to postpone its Dec. 18 transportation briefing before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Loux said in a letter that the delay would help"assure that the commission has the benefit of a more complete and balanced picture of spent fuel and high level waste transportation." Committee associate director Sher Bahadur said the advisers will be presenting observations, not recommendations, during their annual meeting with the five Nuclear Regulatory Commission members. The advisers also are scheduled to discuss the regulatory panel's Yucca Mountain review plan, the durability of nuclear waste containers, repository risk factors and volcanic issues, Bahadur said. Loux also said in a Monday letter to NRC chairman Richard Meserve that Nevada has a stake in ensuring that the casks used to transport nuclear material to Yucca Mountain can withstand accidents, terrorist acts or sabotage. He noted that New Mexico and other states participated in testing a container used to ship mixed nuclear waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M. Loux said the NRC has yet to release its draft protocol for cask testing and has not rescheduled public meetings that were to be held in Nevada last summer. The advisory committee is composed of scientists who weigh technical issues in the planned development of a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. The committee passes its advice to NRC commissioners who would review an Energy Department license application to build and run the dump. Advisory panel chairman George Hornberger denied Nevada was snubbed at last month's transportation workshop. He said the session was designed to focus on"generic"issues, not Yucca Mountain. © Copyright Reno Gazette-Journal , a Gannett Co. Inc. ***************************************************************** 31 Prejudice against nuclear reprocessing must go: Chidambaram | ***************************************************************** 32 State records on LES recruitment sought * * *Tuesday, 12/10/02* By KELLI SAMANTHA HEWETT /Staff Writer/ Officials say group will find nothing inappropriate/* Some opponents of a proposed uranium enrichment plant in Hartsville, Tenn., are looking for a state paper trail to see if the governor and top economic commissioner actively recruited Louisiana Energy Services, a consortium of U.S. and foreign businesses. State and business officials say the wooing never happened. The Tennessee Environmental Council, a leading opponent of the uranium plant, made its requests yesterday for all ''records, communications and the names of personnel involved in any meetings, discussion or work regarding LES operations in Tennessee.'' The state's open records law makes available all state communications relating to LES or Urenco, a company in the LES consortium whose technology would be used in the proposed uranium enrichment plant. LES wants to build the $1.1. billion plant in Trousdale County. It earlier had considered Unicoi County in East Tennessee. Some residents and environmental opponents are worried about health and safety risks. ''We have speculated for several months that the governor's office was involved in recruiting LES,'' said Will Callaway, of the environmental council. ''We feel we need to know more about incentive offers and to what extent local officials were involved.'' Copies of Callaway's letter were sent to both Gov. Don Sundquist and Tony Grande, commissioner of the Department of Economic and Community Development. Officials from both offices said they plan to provide the information. The governor was among several state officials who made an economic development trip in the fall. The trip came after LES announced its desire to come to Middle Tennessee. ''The governor and his staff met with Urenco officials,'' said Melanie Catania, a spokeswoman for Sundquist. ''It was a standard part of the trip. They meet with industry leaders all the time. Urenco had expressed an interest in coming to Tennessee. It's natural to meet with companies interested in locating in Tennessee.'' The recruiting effort was pretty routine, Grande said. A standard recruitment letter went out to Urenco in early summer after officials learned LES might be interested in Unicoi. State officials then sent a similar letter when LES shifted its interest to Hartsville. ''There has not been a lot of effort to recruit LES,'' Grande said. ''Sometimes these organizations use these requests as publicity stunts, but our office has a history of being upfront.'' LES spokeswoman Nan Kilkeary also said state officials did no early recruitment or special recruitment. ''They are certainly entitled to whatever information, but they won't find anything,'' Kilkeary said. ''The state of Tennessee made no active recruiting effort.'' This is the second time in less than a week that the Tennessee Environmental Council has taken action on the LES issue. On Friday, the organization sent out letters to five county executives asking them to consider waiting until 2004 to make a decision so that the issue* *could be added to the general election ballot. The five counties are key members in the Four Lake Regional Industrial Development Authority, which owns about 250 acres of land that LES wants to buy for the new uranium enrichment plant. Local leaders say they expect to decide on selling the land in March. HOME | LOCAL NEWS ***************************************************************** 33 *Borough Council unanimously opposes landfill?s radiation monitoring plan* Evan Brandt, Mercury Staff Writer December 10, 2002 *POTTSTOWN -- Monitoring garbage for radiation should happen before it gets on the truck, not when it shows up at the landfill -- at least that?s how Pottstown Borough Council sees it.* A unanimous vote Monday saw a resolution passed that opposes a plan by the Pottstown Landfill to monitor incoming trash trucks for potential contamination by radiation. The plan is required by law, and a hearing on the landfill?s proposal is set for Monday at the Montgomery County Community College?s west campus in Pottstown. Although these plans are being enacted at landfills around the commonwealth, the hearing in Pottstown is the only one being held in Pennsylvania. It begins at 7 p.m. But before any public comment is taken at that hearing, Borough Council has now already registered its unanimous opposition. Included in the plan, explained Borough Councilman Robert Downie, is a proposal to accept three kinds of low-level radioactive waste. Those include waste from nuclear medical procedures, waste containing naturally occurring radioactive materials and electronics containing naturally occurring radioactive materials. All three are said to have short half-lives and thus pose little public threat. But Downie and others remain unconvinced. "We have a duty to protect future generations," said Downie. "We have to do the best we can to prevent the creation of a problem which could cause them harm." "Remember," added Councilman Stephen Toroney, "the landfill is nearing the end of its capacity. Whatever radioactive stuff they take will be at the top of the heap." "We know there is some (radiation) in there already, but we have to be proactive," said Downie. "It?s the cumulative effect which may end up causing more harm than we ever believed." Downie said the council is particularly concerned about the fact that the Pottstown Sewer Authority is under a contract to treat the landfill?s leachate for 30 years after the closure of the landfill. Allowing low-level radioactive waste into the landfill could cause the leachate to become radioactive and thus contaminate the sewer system, the waste water treatment plant and even the Schuylkill River, into which the borough?s treated sewage is spewed. Also expressing concern Monday night was Donna Cuthbert, an activist with the Alliance for a Clean Environment. She suggested the monitoring plan "won?t protect the public." "When you consider the number of trucks coming in there, it?s impossible for them to inspect them all. They would have to monitor a truck every two minutes, and it?s not going to work," she said. "If DEP wants to protect the public, they should put monitors on the trucks before radioactive waste gets dragged through this community," said Cuthbert. "The responsibility should be dealt with at the point of origin. "Waste Management (which owns the landfill) is in business to make money, and with 300 trucks per day coming in, they are not going to stop the whole operation because they have detected a radioactive tissue," Cuthbert said. But that is exactly the example John Wardzinski, who runs the Pottstown Landfill for Waste Management, used when he spoke about the plan after Monday?s meeting. Noting that the plan and the process by which it will be carried out is required by law and "not our idea," Wardzinski said the monitors through which the trucks will drive "really can detect a radioactive tissue, that?s no exaggeration." He said, "From the reports I?ve seen from other landfills which have already done this, a lot of trucks are being stopped because of kitty litter, because people?s cats are getting treated at the vet and then it gets into the kitty litter." Wardzinski said DEP experts, not anyone at the landfill, will determine the threat posed by any radioactive waste that is pulled out as a result of monitoring. "It?s the DEP that will be making any determination about whether or not it can be safely disposed of in the landfill, not us," Wardzinski said. /©The Mercury 2002/ ***************************************************************** 34 Israel Threatens to Launch Nuclear Attack on Islamic Sites December 10, 2002 [News Content] [TehranTimes Navigation] By Our Staff Writer THERAN -- A high-ranking Israeli officer threatened that the Zionist regime would launch nuclear attack on Islamic holy sites in the Middle East, an Israeli newspaper said Sunday. In case Israel was attacked by states or groups, the Jewish state would respond by dropping nuclear bombs on Islamic cities such as Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia and Qom in Iran. The Haaretz newspaper quoted an unidentified high-ranking officer a s saying. It is an irony of our time Iraq has been suffering for a decade because it is accused of having some capabilities of unconventional weapons, while Israel announces that it possesses nuclear weapons, but there is not any international action against it. The officer, a guide in the Israeli military academy, was quoted as saying that Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear warheads along with their delivery systems, including long-range ballistic missiles, long-range bombers and nuclear submarines. Indeed, while is Iraq under the pressure, Israel is the only entity in the Middle East to possess a huge arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, including a sizable nuclear arsenal. It is unfortunate that the United States, Israel's main protector, has always prevented any serious move to discuss Israel's weapons of mass destruction. But at the same time it has accused a number of other countries of trying to acquire weapons of mass destruction. It has put them under pressure on the basis of the very baseless accusations it has leveled against them. It is time the Islamic world in the first place and the international community too took serious action to contain Israel. The Zionist regime is an occupationist, expansionist entity. It must be contained, else the entire world will be in danger. Home Page [http://www.tehrantimes.com/default.asp] | [webmaster@tehrantimes.com] ***************************************************************** 35 U.N. Teams Head Toward Iraq Uranium Mine Las Vegas SUN December 10, 2002 By CHARLES J. HANLEY ASSOCIATED PRESS BAGHDAD, Iraq- International nuclear monitors drove six hours across the Iraqi desert to a remote uranium mining site in one of five inspections mounted Tuesday, a marked expansion of the U.N. field operation. Still more inspectors were flying to Iraq later in the day. Iraq's chief liaison to the U.N. teams, meanwhile, told a Baghdad newspaper the Iraqis have found the inspectors to be working in a "calm and professional" manner. But he again complained about last week's surprise inspection of one of Saddam Hussein's palaces, calling it an American-inspired provocation. Tuesday marked the end of the second week of field missions for the U.N. inspectors, who have returned to Iraq after a four-year absence under a Security Council resolution requiring the Baghdad government to give up any remaining chemical or biological weapons, and shut down any programs to make them. Iraq denies it still has such weapons or programs. The Iraq field missions were expanding as U.N. analysts began combing through 12,000 pages of documents submitted by Iraq to the United Nations over the weekend, detailing past programs of weapons of mass destruction and what it says are purely civilian programs today in the chemical, biological and nuclear areas. Inspections in the 1990s, after Iraq's defeat in the Gulf War, led to the destruction of tons of chemical and biological weapons, and to the dismantling of Iraq's program to try to build atomic bombs. Tuesday, reporters followed several cars of U.N. nuclear experts to mining operations at Ashakat, in the desert near the Syrian border 250 miles west of Baghdad. The enormous complex surrounded by antenna posts, some broken, sat in an otherwise empty quarter of the desert. Reporters were unable to follow the inspectors inside. The U.N. team presumably wanted to assess current Ashakat operations in the light of what was found there by U.N. nuclear inspectors in the 1990s. In the 1980s, the phosphate deposits at Ashakat had been exploited for their uranium content as well as for fertilizer, producing some 100 tons of uranium over six years. Also Tuesday, other nuclear inspectors headed again for al-Tuwaitha, Iraq's major nuclear research center, 15 miles southeast of Baghdad, Iraqi Information Ministry officials reported. It was their third recent visit to the sprawling complex, where Iraqi scientists in the 1980s worked on developing technology for enriching uranium to levels usable in bombs. A third U.N. team was reported to have gone to a veterinary medicine establishment at Abu Ghraib, just west of Baghdad - presumably the Amariyah Serum and Vaccine Institute, site of biological weapons-related research in the 1980s. That institute is reported to have expanded its storage capacity, to an extent the U.S. government says exceeds Iraq's needs. Iraq contends the facility only makes and stores human vaccines. Other inspectors were reported to have gone Tuesday to a military training center in Baghdad and to an industrial facility at al-Furat, just south of the Iraqi capital. The purposes of those visits were not immediately known. In London, Prime Minister Tony Blair said it would be "naive" to believe Saddam plans to comply with U.N. demands for his disarmament in the field of weapons of mass destruction. In an interview with the Financial Times, Blair also restated the readiness of the United States and Britain to take military action against Saddam. "If there is a breach and Saddam doesn't comply, then we are prepared to take action," Blair was quoted as saying. Later Tuesday, about 25 additional inspectors were scheduled to arrive on a flight from a U.N. rear base on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, bolstering the U.N. inspection staff to approximately 70. Inspection team leaders have said they hope to expand operations to eight teams by year's end. In an interview published Tuesday in the weekly al-Rafidayn, Lt. Gen. Hossam Mohammed Amin, chief Iraqi liaison, said of the inspectors' "behavior" that "we're satisfied with it so far because it is calm and professional." Iraqi officials have complained sharply, however, about the U.N. inspection Dec. 3 of Baghdad's al-Sajoud palace, one of Saddam's many presidential palaces. Amin reiterated that criticism. "The visit took place under pressure from the United States of America to create a crisis or confrontation between Iraq and inspection teams, but this did not happen," he asserted. Such palace inspections contributed to the U.N.-Iraqi tensions that ended with the collapse of the previous inspection regime in 1998. The new U.N. resolution declares the monitors have unrestricted power to inspect such sites. Asked how long he expects the new U.N. inspections to take, Amin said that if the inspection agencies are "sincere," he thinks they should take eight months. "Then the Security Council should suspend the sanctions imposed on Iraq and the monitoring process would continue," he said. He was referring to international economic sanctions imposed on Iraq after it invaded Kuwait in 1990, and to U.N. plans to establish a long-term system of monitoring Iraq's military-industrial complex - via surveillance gear, required reports and periodic visits. All contents copyright 2002 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 36 India to buy Russian submarines, a strategic bomber, and… A Package Deal for a Future War 13:55 2002-12-10 We seem to have already forgotten the old-fashioned Soviet tradition that was widely used before perestroika: unpopular goods were forced upon clients together with the purchase of popular goods. It was a package deal, and these goods would not be sold separately. Today’s Russian authorities have decided look at this Soviet tradition from a different angle The Associated Press informs that in the coming years, Russia will sell several nuclear submarines and a strategic bomber to India. However, if India wants the deal to be successful, it must additionally purchase a batch of training fighter planes. The Russian website Lenta.Ru quotes RF Deputy Minister of Defense Mikhail Dmitriyev as saying in an interview to India’s newspaper the Hindustan Times that Russia and India plan to conclude a package agreement by the beginning of next summer. It is supposed that the Indian armed forces will buy an undisclosed number of submarines of the Akula class and a Tu-22 bomber. It is not clear yet whether or not the Indian military structures will also buy the trainer planes. The Indian Ministry of Defense makes no comments on the issue. Meanwhile, India is currently the world largest importer of Russian weapons. Against the background of the increasing tension in the world, it is highly likely that India will find good use for Russia’s training planes, which, by the way, can be easily transformed into battle-ready planes. Ahtyam Ahtyrov PRAVDA.Ru Translated by Maria Gousseva Read the original in Russian: http://economics.pravda.ru/economics/2002/7/21/64/4066_weapons.ht ml [http://economics.pravda.ru/economics/2002/7/21/64/4066_weapons.h tml] Copyright ©1999 by "Pravda.RU [http://www.pravda.ru/] ". When ***************************************************************** 37 U.S. Sees Nuclear Deterrence Against WMD Attack* / Tue December 10, 2002 07:12 PM ET / By Randall Mikkelsen WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reminded Iraq and other countries on Tuesday that it was prepared to use nuclear weapons if necessary to respond to an attack from weapons of mass destruction. The warning, which underscored longstanding U.S. policy leaving open the use of nuclear weapons if needed, was contained in a statement of U.S. strategy against nuclear, chemical and biological weapons -- the first update since 1993. The six-page strategy document says deterring attacks with the threat of "overwhelming force" is an essential element in protecting America and its allies from weapons of mass destruction, also known as WMD. "The United States will continue to make clear that it reserves the right to respond with overwhelming force -- including through resort to all our options -- to the use of WMD against the United States, our forces abroad, and friends and allies," the strategy report said. "In addition to our conventional and nuclear response and defense capabilities, our overall deterrent posture against WMD threats is reinforced by effective intelligence, surveillance, interdiction and domestic law enforcement capabilities," it said. Senior U.S. officials said the passage was not included the previous U.S. strategy document on weapons of mass destruction, which emphasized efforts to prevent proliferation, and said the new document did not represent a shift in U.S. policy on when it would use nuclear weapons. But the passage was put in the new report as part of an increased emphasis on the role of deterrence against a weapons of mass destruction attack, they said. Other major elements of the new strategy include strengthening nonproliferation measures, beefing up defenses and combating the effects of an attack on the population. The strategy report was released amid the looming possibility of war with Iraq, which the United States accuses of possessing weapons of mass destruction, officials said. "The language speaks for itself, and I think it does apply to any state that would use weapons of mass destruction against us," a senior official said. But the warning emphasizes and makes explicit for other countries a private warning Bush's father, former President George Bush, made in a letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein on the eve of the first Gulf War. In that letter, the United States threatened the "severest consequences" if Iraq were to use chemical or biological weapons against the United States, destroy Kuwaiti oil fields or participate in terrorism. "It was clear in terms of the message that we would respond with all of our options. ... The Iraqis have told us that they interpreted that letter as meaning the United States would use nuclear weapons, and it was a powerful deterrent," the official said. Although Iraq later set fire to Kuwaiti oil fields and supported terrorism, the official said, it did not "cross the line" of using chemical or biological weapons. ***************************************************************** 38 Press freedom prize awarded to Russian reporter Grigory Pasko www.sunspot.net ***************************************************************** 40 Government asks for extension in whistleblower suit MyInKy December 10, 2002 PADUCAH, Ky.- The U.S. Department of Justice has asked for a six-week extension to determine whether the federal government will join a whistleblower suit accusing Lockheed Martin Co. of causing widespread contamination when it operated the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant. A request was filed Monday. It is the 14th time since the suit was filed in June 1999 that the government has asked for an extension, and each one has been approved by U.S. District Judge Joseph McKinley Jr. The suit will not be litigated until the government makes its decision. In asking for a delay in October, Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Campbell told the judge that he "anticipated the matter will be processed for a final decision on intervention" by Dec. 17. The week after that delay was granted, a federal grand jury in Louisville began investigating whether Lockheed's activities were criminal, according to former workers who have been asked to testify. Campbell said the additional time is needed to review thousands of pages of documents and material gathered by investigators, and that the grand jury investigation is not the reason. Lockheed and its predecessor companies operated the plant for the Energy Department from 1982 until 1992. The suit claims Lockheed made false statements involving storage and disposal of radioactive waste, exposure of workers to contaminants, and contamination of groundwater and soil with plutonium, neptunium and other radioactive materials. Because of the false statements, Lockheed was paid hundreds of millions of dollars in operating fees that it didn't deserve, the suit contends. It also claims the company's activities caused contamination that is costing the government hundreds of millions of dollars to clean up. Information from: The Paducah Sun [http://www.myinky.com ***************************************************************** 41 DOE to settle partial debt in land deal The Oak Ridger Online -- Area News -- 11:24 a.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 by R. Cathey Daniels Oak Ridger staff In a move calculated to partially settle its debt for damage to the Lower Watts Bar Reservoir, the Department of Energy is working a land deal that would preserve 3,209 acres in Oak Ridge. A DOE spokesman said Monday he did not know for how long the property would be preserved in the "conservation easement" which would be managed by the state. The DOE would retain ownership of the land, which begins just west of Wisconsin Avenue and continues west to wrap around the K-25 site in three parcels. The DOE will formally announce its agreement with the state at 12:30 p.m. Dec. 20 at Horizon Center. Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Jesse Roberson is expected to make the announcement, with Gov. Don Sundquist and U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, R-3rd District, in attendance. The action comes amid negotiations by the state, the DOE, the Tennessee Valley Authority and the U.S. Department of Interior for a settlement of an estimated $4.8 million to $7.2 million in lost recreational use damages at Lower Watts Bar Reservoir due to contaminated sediments from DOE activities. It is estimated that it would cost $30 billion to remove the contaminated sediments. DOE did not take remedial action, according to the record of decision, because removal of the sediment would cause further dispersion. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, DOE is liable for the restoration of natural resources lost or injured from releases of hazardous substances. The deal is worked through a Natural Resources Damage Claim, which is part of the CERCLA. The parties form a Trustee Council which oversees the action and determines restitution. The land deal is reportedly only one of several expected actions. According to the DOE Oak Ridge Operations office, the Trustee Council is continuing to assess the full extent of injuries to the Lower Watts Bar Reservoir, and will continue to involve the public in its deliberations, including the completion of an ecological appraisal of land set aside for a conservation easement. Walter Perry, spokesman, said Monday that many details of the deal "are yet to be determined" but that DOE "is working diligently to make this happen." The property mirrors that designated by the Land Use Focus Group as Oak Ridge Reservation land appropriate for preservation. R. Cathey Daniels can be contacted at (865) 220-5515 or danielsrcd@oakridger.com [danielsrcd@oakridger.com] . All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger ***************************************************************** 42 Bechtel Jacobs cites failed work planning in radioactive release The Oak Ridger Online -- Area News -- 12:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2002 by R. Cathey Daniels Oak Ridger staff A radioactive release at Oak Ridge National Laboratory which led to the declaration of a July 1 "operational emergency"; activated the UT-Battelle Situation Management Team; and required days of surveys and testing has been deemed "preventable" and a result of failed work planning by Bechtel Jacobs Co. Company officials say the release was less than 2 millicuries. A millicurie is one thousandth of a curie, which is a measure of the rate of radioactive decay. A curie is equivalent to the radioactivity of 1 gram of radium or 37 billion disintegrations per second. The release was attributed to a high-efficiency particulate air filter change conducted by Duratek Federal Services, a subcontractor to Bechtel Jacobs, the cleanup contractor for the Department of Energy. Bechtel Jacobs managed the filter changes. The filters were changed on the roof of Building 3038 on June 26 and June 27 and were pinpointed in the release of strontium 90 at the entrance to ORNL on 5th Street. A Bechtel Jacobs final report was issued Monday. A Bechtel Jacobs spokesman said Tuesday that there was "no possible exposure off-site and minimal possible exposure on-site." Workers and automobiles were sampled for exposure and none found, said the spokesman. Bechtel Jacobs conducted an investigation and concluded that "investigation of potential hazards continues to be an area that needs improvement" for the company and its workers and subcontractors. The investigation's findings included: * Pre-filters for hot cells and glove boxes were removed and/or left in incorrect positions during operations. * Extreme ductwork contamination was not evaluated in facility safety documents. * Historic hazard screening was inadequate. * Appropriately qualified personnel were not utilized during planning and review of the work. * Environmental hazards were not adequately addressed in the work plan. * A filter change-out procedure was not completed as required. The contamination was first discovered June 29 in 5th Street during routine radiological surveying for the opening of that area as a new entrance to ORNL. After further investigation radiological contamination was also found in an alleyway between Buildings 3036 and 3047, at the Building 4007 parking lot, the Central Avenue sidewalk, at the flagpole parking lot across from Building 4500-N, at the parking lot at Building 5000/5002 and in the construction area adjacent to ORNL owned by the private sector. When the Duratek operations were pinpointed as the suspected cause of the problem, Bechtel Jacobs was called in to take over investigations. R. Cathey Daniels can be contacted at (865) 220-5515 or danielsrcd@oakridger.com [danielsrcd@oakridger.com] . All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger ***************************************************************** 43 ?Culture of Theft? Reported at U.S. Nuclear Lab *Monday, December 9, 2002* Los Angeles Times LOS ALAMOS, N.M. ? A ?culture of theft? at Los Alamos National Laboratory costs taxpayers millions of dollars each year and endangers national security, according to two investigators recently fired by the laboratory. Glenn A. Walp and Steven Doran, both former police officers, say they were recruited by Los Alamos officials earlier this year to investigate corruption at the lab, which houses the nation?s nuclear secrets and monitors the quality of the nuclear arsenal. But after finding far more corruption than Los Alamos officials suspected ? including hundreds of missing items that could prove valuable to terrorists or rogue nations ? the investigators were handed identical letters of dismissal on Nov. 25 and escorted from the laboratory by armed guards. While becoming yet another embarrassment for the famously troubled laboratory, the firings have sparked outcries in Congress and conspiracy charges in the public. ?They?re going to rue the day they did this,? said Pete Stockton, senior investigator with Project On Government Oversight, a nonprofit group that monitors waste and fraud in the federal government. ?This ranks as one of the stupidest things I?ve ever seen an institution do.? Laboratory officials say the investigators were fired because their overly aggressive tactics and combative attitude alienated workers. But the investigators contend they were fired because their bosses cared less about safeguarding one of the nation?s most important scientific and military sites than about protecting the image of the University of California, which runs Los Alamos for the Department of Energy. Los Alamos officials acknowledge that the FBI and the Department of Energy are looking into several leads turned up by the fired investigators. Walp and Doran say those leads include glaring lapses in security ? like one worker who tried to buy a $30,000 customized Ford Mustang with laboratory money, and another who used her laboratory credit card to get $2,500 in cash at a casino. University of California officials said Friday that they will urge the Energy Department to widen its inquiry into Los Alamos to include the firings. ?We want them to address the assertion that (Walp and Doran) may have been fired in retaliation for (their) investigation,? said Michael Reese, spokesman for UC President Richard Atkinson. Begin optional trim Home in the 1940s to the Manhattan Project, the nation?s historic nuclear weapons program, Los Alamos has been sullied in recent years by a series of security breakdowns ? including the disappearance in June 2000 of classified computer hard drives that later turned up behind a copy machine and the December 1999 indictment of Wen Ho Lee, a former lab scientist accused of leaking nuclear secrets to China. Although nearly all charges eventually were dropped against Lee, he was found to have removed secret data from the laboratory, a stunning breach. (End optional trim) ?Through the years there has been ingrained within the laboratory this culture of theft,? said Walp, 61, former head of the Pennsylvania State Police who was hired to lead the internal security force at Los Alamos last January. ?There is an attitude that (theft) is the price of doing business.? Los Alamos workers joke about theft increasing around the holidays, Walp said, because some fill out their Christmas lists with big-ticket items from the lab. ?The problem isn?t with scientists,? Walp said. ?They?re just there doing their jobs. It?s the middle people.? Soon after arriving at the laboratory, Walp wrote a damning report that estimated $3 million in equipment had been stolen since 1999. Among the missing items were more than 260 computers ? some from the most sensitive areas of the laboratory, where nuclear weapons are designed. The report, Walp said, only served to irritate his bosses, who often told Walp that his first loyalty was to the University of California, not the U.S. taxpayer. Los Alamos spokesman Jim Danneskiold dismissed the charge that the facility is rife with corruption. ?There is no culture of theft here,? he said. ?People do not walk out of here with property.? Danneskiold said roughly one-tenth of 1 percent of the lab?s $1 billion inventory disappears each year, far below the percentage that large retail stores deem acceptable. Many items that appear stolen, he said, are stored in some forgotten Quonset hut or World War II-era shed. Los Alamos has more than 2,000 buildings on its 40-square mile site, he said, and things get mislaid. However, he insisted, ?there is no evidence that there is any classified information on computers reported as missing.? Although Walp and Doran considered themselves investigators, Danneskiold said, they had no ?investigatory powers? but were given the tasks of gathering information and acting as ?liaisons with law enforcement.? ?The reason for terminating their employment was that they had lost the confidence of different officials they had to work with, both inside the laboratory and outside,? Danneskiold said. Doran and Walp, however, said it was absurd to expect them to retain the confidence of workers they were questioning. ?It?s the most screwed-up system you ever saw in your life,? said Doran, 39, whom Walp hired at the laboratory in July. ?The fox is watching the chicken house.? Doran also scoffed at the suggestion that missing items were merely ?mislaid.? ?One of the missing items was a 2-ton magnet,? he said. ?How do you lose a 2-ton magnet?? The most shocking case of theft, Walp and Doran said, involved two workers with access to all top secret areas. The workers allegedly went on a brazen spree, using lab purchase orders to acquire hundreds of items ? including spy gear, for reasons that remain unknown. ?It?s unbelievable,? said Doran, a former Marine and ex-police chief in Idaho City, Idaho. ?They bought camping equipment, backpacks, lock picks, beacons, radio equipment, high speed digital cameras, $9,000 worth of the best knives money can buy, tractors, lawn mowers, wood chippers, floor sanders, fencing, decks, carports, high-pressure washers, air conditioning units.? Also, the two workers allegedly stole cryogenic freezers, which Doran said could be useful to anyone developing biological weapons. The two suspected workers have been placed on paid leave, Los Alamos officials said, while the FBI investigates. Doran called it unfair and insulting that workers suspected of felonies remain on paid leave, while he and Walp were summarily fired. Also, Doran said, both he and Walp received outstanding performance reviews just before being fired. Walp even got a $5,000 bonus. Both Walp and Doran have hired lawyers and may file a lawsuit. (Optional add end) Walp and Doran also may testify before Congress. A spokesman for the House Committee on Energy and Commerce said the firings have prompted grave concern among lawmakers, who likely will hold hearings soon and send a team of their own investigators to Los Alamos in the next few weeks. ?For some time now the committee has been quietly looking into operations at Los Alamos,? said Ken Johnson, spokesman for Rep. W.J. ?Billy? Tauzin, R-La., the committee chairman. ?But these dramatic new developments clearly warrant full-scale congressional investigation. ?Frankly, the accusations are extraordinary, and we?re determined to get to the bottom of this mess.? This page was created December 9, 2002 Copyright ©2002 The Repository ***************************************************************** 44 LANL Memo Stirs Fear of Reprisals* * *Santa Fe New Mexican* *_home_* By JEFF TOLLEFSON | The New Mexican 12/10/2002 Buried inside a memo ordering all employees at Los Alamos National Laboratory to cooperate with federal investigators is what might appear to be an inconsequential directive: Any material turned over to investigators with the Office of Inspector General should be forwarded to lab management as well. * "Employees providing copies of documents to the OIG (Office of Inspector General) should provide copies of a set of those documents to the Audits & Assessments Office," Los Alamos Associate Director of Administration Richard Marquez wrote in the Thursday memo. Lab officials say the order is intended to help the lab respond to questions from investigators. But critics pounced on the memo, saying such an order compromises the confidentiality of employees who fear retaliation by lab management. The reasoning is simple: Employees will be less likely to cooperate if they have to go to lab management with any material they provide to outside investigators. The memo also caught the eye of the U.S. Department of Energy's Inspector General, which is currently looking into allegations of fraud and other illegal activities - as well as alleged attempts by management to cover up these wrongdoings. After learning of the memo, the Inspector General released this response: "The Office of Inspector General anticipates that audits, inspections and investigations can be conducted without impediment. We are troubled by any statement that could be interpreted as hindering full and open cooperation with the Office of Inspector General." The Office of Inspector General declined to elaborate. One watchdog group tracking the debate cited the Thursday memo as proof the lab still doesn't understand - or doesn't care about - recent allegations regarding security, accountability and retaliation against whistleblowers. "Given that Audits and Assessments is one of the central offices that appears to be involved in the cover-up, ... that caveat shows that Los Alamos management really doesn't get it," said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Project on Government Oversight. "They don't understand that they are the problem." Laboratory spokesman Jim Danneskiold said the Audits and Assessments Office maintains a list of materials provided to the Inspector General to ensure the lab can respond to questions posed by the investigators. "The process of providing documents in this manner is part of the extra effort the laboratory is making to ensure the IG gets a comprehensive picture of the issues it is looking into," he said. Citing the lab's whistleblower policy, Danneskiold said anybody can provide these or any other documents to Audits and Assessments through a process designed to maintain confidentiality. Nonetheless, the lab's whistleblower policy has come under fire precisely because it does not protect the identity of those who blow the whistle. The section on confidentiality stresses situations in which the identity of a whistleblower could be released to "supervisors, witnesses and alleged retaliators." Brian, of the Project on Government Oversight, pointed to recent allegations of retaliation against whistleblowers, including the recent termination of two lab employees who were investigating a current fraud case and other problems within lab ranks. Lab officials said the employees "lost the confidence" of management in Audits and Assessments and other divisions. But one of the fired investigators countered that people in these same divisions appeared to be covering up problems and inhibiting investigations. Brian said the memo taps into such fears: "How duplicitous to say, 'Feel free to say whatever you want. We just want to know everything you said.' " The House Energy and Commerce Committee on Monday reaffirmed its commitment to a "sweeping and far-reaching investigation" of activities at the Los Alamos lab. A team of investigators will be visiting the lab in the coming weeks, the committee said. "Obviously we are very concerned about any possible recriminations against employees," said committee spokesman Kenneth Johnson. "These are very serious allegations; in fact they are extraordinary allegations, and Congress is determined to get to the bottom of it," Johnson said. "We intend to use every resource at our disposal, including hearings and subpoenas, if necessary, to get a handle on what's going on at the lab." The New Mexican* ***************************************************************** 45 Energy Secretary Points to Government/Industry Partnerships to Solve Transmission Bottlenecks --> energy.gov - Headquarters' Press Release RELEASE DATE: December 9, 2002 [Print Friendly Version] WASHINGTON, DC — Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham today praised a government-industry partnership that could one day more than double the amount of electricity carried on our nation's high-voltage power lines. The new cable, developed by the 3M Company, is made up of ceramic fibers embedded in an aluminum matrix surrounded by temperature-resistant aluminum-zirconium wires. The cable, called Aluminum Conductor Composite Reinforced, is smaller in diameter and lighter than the steel-reinforced conductor used today. "The field test of this new conductor in Fargo is an example of government-industry partnership working together to find sound ways to upgrade our transmission system infrastructure," Secretary Abraham said. "DOE's leadership in the testing phase helps to jump-start new technology like 3M's composite conductor and bring innovative solutions to market sooner." "In this effort, we brought together the technical expertise of Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the hands-on operational excellence of the Western Area Power Administration with innovators such as the 3M Company. This is just one way DOE is working hand-in-hand with industry to eliminate transmission bottlenecks that restrict future economic growth in several areas across our country," Secretary Abraham added. The field test in Fargo, N.D., in progress for about a month now, is testing the cable's mechanical ability to withstand harsh weather conditions including high winds, extreme temperatures and icing. Media Contact: Jill Schroeder Vieth, 202/586-4940 Tom Welch, 202/586-5806 Release No. PR-02-255 ***************************************************************** 46 Los Alamos Memo to Employees Stirs Fear Guardian Unlimited | World Latest | Tuesday December 10, 2002 3:10 PM LOS ALAMOS, N.M. (AP) - A memo from the Los Alamos National Laboratory telling employees to give the lab copies of documents they provide to federal investigators compromises the confidentiality of employees, critics said. The message from the lab's associate director, Richard Marquez, was in a memo Thursday that ordered employees at the nuclear weapons lab to cooperate with investigators. The Department of Energy and the FBI are looking into allegations of theft and fraud at Los Alamos, including millions of dollars in missing equipment and abuse of lab credit cards. The memo instructed workers to forward any documents they provide to investigators to the lab's Audits and Assessments Office. But critics say the order prompts fears of retaliation by lab management. ``How duplicitous to say, 'Feel free to say whatever you want. We just want to know everything you said,''' said Danielle Brian, executive director of Project on Government Oversight, a Washington-based watchdog group. Lab spokesman Jim Danneskiold said the audit division maintains a list of materials provided to the Inspector General to ensure the lab can assist investigators. Two lab employees who were investigating fraud charges and other problems within the lab were fired last month. Lab officials said they had lost confidence in the pair. On the Net: Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://www.lanl.gov Project on Government Oversight: http://www.pogo.org Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002 ***************************************************************** 47 DOE to reserve 3,200 acres for conservation By Frank Munger, News-Sentinel senior writer December 10, 2002 OAK RIDGE - The U.S. Department of Energy plans to set aside more than 3,200 acres of its Oak Ridge reservation for conservation purposes. Details of the property-management plan are not yet final, but the federal agency will sign an agreement in principle Dec. 20 with state authorities, including Gov. Don Sundquist. Walter Perry, a DOE spokesman in Oak Ridge, said Monday the proposed action is partly in response to recommendations of a land-use focus group, which included local citizens and representatives of various business and environmental organizations. Setting aside the federal land for "green space" also will address DOE's liabilities for natural resources damages under the Superfund cleanup act, Perry said. Those liabilities are related to contamination from Cold War nuclear activities at the government's Oak Ridge facilities. The land designated for conservation involves three parcels on the northwest area of the federal reservation, including a rugged section known as Black Oak Ridge. The undeveloped parcels are adjacent to the East Tennessee Technology Park, a former uranium-enrichment plant that's being cleaned up and converted to private industrial uses. DOE will retain ownership of the property but will turn over management responsibility of the land to the state under an easement to be signed later, Perry said. The spokesman said there is no known contamination on the designated parcels, but if subsequent surveys uncover any problems, DOE will assume responsibility for cleanup. Future use of the federal reservation has become a major issue in Oak Ridge during the post-Cold War period. Some parties want more land converted to economic development, with others arguing for environmental protection. DOE has turned over several parcels for industrial use, and this will be the second area set aside for conservation. In 1999, DOE signed a land-use permit that designated 3,000 acres for wildlife preservation on the southeast part of the reservation near Melton Hill Lake. Frank Munger is a senior writer who covers the Department of Energy. He can be reached at 865-482-9213 or twig1@knoxnews.infi.net. The Knoxville News-Sentinel Co. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 48 Portrait: Daniel Ellsberg Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | 'It's time to take risks' In 1971, former marine Daniel Ellsberg leaked documents that exposed US government lies and helped end the Vietnam war. He tells Duncan Campbell why he did it, and why he is calling on today's officials to do the same to the Bush regime - and prevent a war in Iraq Tuesday December 10, 2002 [http://www.guardian.co.uk] A little more than 30 years ago, the leaking of 7,000 pages of Pentagon documents, which exposed an extraordinary catalogue of lies and duplicity on the part of the US government, helped to bring an end to the war in Vietnam. Daniel Ellsberg, a former marine company commander, who had served in Vietnam, leaked the documents, risking a life sentence to do so. Now he is finally telling the whole story of how he became perhaps the most important whistle-blower of the past half century. It is a bright autumnal day in Berkeley, California, and Ellsberg, now a sprightly 71, is having a rest day from a cross-country tour to promote his memoirs, Secrets. It is his account of how he, an analyst with the Rand Corporation, who had worked in the Pentagon under defence secretary Robert McNamara and for the state department in Vietnam, was finally driven by his conscience to reveal how successive US governments had stumbled into a war that cost more than a million Vietnamese and 55,000 American lives, and how successive presidents had lied to the American people about the conflict's conduct and consequences. Ellsberg photocopied what were to become known as the Pentagon papers, and then tried to persuade politicians to release them and alert the country. When that failed, he gave them to the New York Times. To ensure that the papers would all be distributed, he went on the run, prompting what was described as "the largest FBI manhunt since the Lindbergh kidnapping". When the FBI finally caught up with him in June 1971, he was charged with 12 felonies and faced 115 years in jail. He might well still be in prison were it not for the almost psychopathic desire of President Nixon and his team to extract revenge: a burglary of Ellsberg's psychoanalyst's office was authorised in the hope of finding information that might discredit him or, when publicised, drive him to suicide. The Watergate burglars, Gordon Liddy and Howard Hunt, carried it out. A team of heavies was recruited to break Ellsberg's legs. His phone was tapped. It also emerged, during his trial in 1973, that the judge had earlier been offered the post of director of the FBI, a job he coveted. Once these plots became known, the judge had to abandon the trial and acquit Ellsberg. The Pentagon papers also helped to so discredit the war that they became one of the key factors in the US's final withdrawal and Nixon's humiliating resignation. Ellsberg became a counter-cultural hero. Secrets recounts this story, filling in the many gaps that remained at the time of the trial. It is also, in a way, a love story about how he fell for his wife, Patricia Marx, and her pivotal role in ensuring that the papers were leaked. The Ellsbergs now live in a rambling, unpretentious home in Berkeley, surrounded by buddhas and roses. Ellsberg has been speaking so much that his voice is almost gone but he talks with the same intensity that took him into the dock three decades ago. He sees many parallels between then and now, with the country on the brink of another war. "One of the key differences is that the military now are clearly against this, which was not the case with Vietnam. The military hated the way Lyndon Johnson conducted the war but they wanted to get into it. This military clearly does not want the war so they're leaking. The reasons Bush has given are ridiculous - democracy, give me a break." He lists "oil, oil and oil" as the main reasons for the present war plans. He also anticipates an "incident" that will be used as a rationale for the first US strike, just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident - a supposed attack on a US destroyer - precipitated deeper US military action in Vietnam. "Bush will want to claim, just as Johnson did, that he was immediately protecting American troops. He will want to say 'I'm bombing because I have intelligence that Americans are at immediate risk. They are putting chemical warheads on missiles, we think. I can't take the chance.' "I believe Rumsfeld, Cheney and Wolfowitz are using our own troops as bait. There will be deaths, and they know that." Ellsberg has noted that there have been frequent leaks about the war plans in recent weeks. "There is great dissent and that is clearly the major reason for the leaking. It is clear that the administration is filled with people who believe this is reckless, unnecessary, foolish ... I am using every opportunity to say to people in the government who are in the position that I was then, and who know that their president is lying us into a wrongful and reckless war, to do what I wish I had done in 1964-65: to go to Congress and the press with documents and tell the truth. That would be a risk but there are times when big risks are worth that to save a lot of lives." Ellsberg says that he doesn't like telling people to take risks that he is not taking, which is why he is announcing that his book contains some still unclassified secrets - one about a dialogue between Johnson and the then Canadian prime minister, Lester Pearson, in which nuclear war was discussed as an option in Vietnam. He is challenging attorney general John Ashcroft to prosecute him for breaking the law. Ellsberg is understanding about how people in power are co-opted into a system in which leaking becomes hard. "There is no set of genes, no hypodermic injection you can take which makes you immune to going along with cruel, indefensible policies that your team and your boss and your president say is what they want to do. I did it, but I don't think I was particularly corrupt for doing that. I don't think there is any human who is incapable of keeping their mouths shut about what they know is wrong." Britain crops up periodically in the discussion. He is appalled that we still have an Official Secrets Act: "It is an outrage. I'd love an opportunity to go to England and testify to anyone on my experience and break their law. You cannot be a democracy in foreign affairs and have the amount of secrecy unchallenged that we have in America or you have in Britain. It's not just a joke, it's something that has to be resisted and changed." The book has revealing vignettes of Henry Kissinger and how he wanted to use journalists to present him as a ladies' man. Ironically, Kissinger had been a big admirer of Ellsberg's, telling an audience of Rand personnel in 1968: "I have learned more from Dan Ellsberg than from any other person in Vietnam." This credibility, and the fact that Ellsberg was a Harvard-educated former company commander in the Marine corps, who had been under fire in Vietnam, was what made him so dangerous. The tapes he reprints of Nixon plotting to damage him is like eavesdropping on a Mafia family dinner: Nixon: Let's get the son-of-a-bitch into jail. Kissinger: We've got to get him. Nixon: Don't worry about his trial ... try him in the press. We want to destroy him in the press ... Is that clear? Kissinger and (attorney general) John Mitchell: Yes. Since the 70s, Ellsberg has earned a living from lecturing and writing, although anti-nuclear activism is his "top priority". He has three children and five grandchildren and a bad back, but shows no signs of slowing down. He has been arrested on many occasions, protesting against US military actions. The almost universally friendly reception of the book has encouraged him. Senator and presidential contender John Kerry has praised him for the courage "which undoubtedly saved American lives in the battlefield". Actor Martin Sheen recommends the book as "essential reading for any American who wants to understand true patriotism". Yet had it not been for the Nixon team's criminality, he says, his release date with good behaviour would not have been until 2008. However, Ellsberg expresses dread at what he fears is an approaching war. "I don't want to test whether Iraqis will fight in their own country for this tyrant, and I do not want to test what Saddam will do if we really set out to kill him," he says. "I can't think when I have felt that it was as ominous as this." · Secrets by Daniel Ellsberg is published in the US by Viking. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002 ***************************************************************** 49 Iraq debate goes beyond facts eastsidejournal.com - [http://apmoneywire.ap.org/] [U.S. Census Bureau Website] 2002-12-10 by Tom Wolfe None of the important questions about Iraq can be answered with facts. But they are a starting point for thinking. The Rev. Sharon Moe, senior pastor of the University Temple United Methodist Church, brought an arsenal of handouts, statistics, maps, color slides and personal observations to Auburn United Methodist Church Sunday night, drawing on two visits to Iraq this year, and a lifetime of asking big questions. Her own views are fiercely anti-war, but she emphasizes personal reflection over political ideology. ``My goal is to get people thinking,'' she explained later. ``I am very careful to respect differences of opinion, and I try not to put people on the spot.'' Even so, an evening of immersion in human catastrophe is an ordeal. An estimated 500,000 Iraqi children have died from the consequences of war -- famine, disease, pollution, birth defects -- and thousands more are on the brink. Moe wants people to think about that, and about depleted uranium, leukemia, Gulf War syndrome, so-called collateral damage, our dependency on oil, the cultural treasures of modern-day Mesopotamia and the true meaning of patriotism. At the same time Moe was speaking in Auburn, the Eastgate Congregational United Church of Christ was hosting a community forum in Bellevue. It lasted more than two hours. I admire the 150 or so people who attended those sessions and took up the challenge to learn more about Iraq. It's a daunting task. And even when you know more, it's not enough. * We know that Saddam Hussein is a ruthless dictator. But we don't know what level of threat he now poses outside his borders. * We know that war is hell, but we don't know how many combatants and civilians would die, how it would affect the economy or what it would mean to history. * We know we could conquer Iraq, but we don't know if that would promote Mideast stability or provoke anti-American terrorism. Our history with Iraq is also confusing. Go back to Aug. 2, 1990, and we have the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, which started the current chain of events. But go back just a few months more, and the picture changes. Go back to January 1990, and you'll see President Bush signing a presidential order promoting trade with Iraq. Go back to 1983 and you'll see Donald Rumsfeld (now defense secretary; then a White House envoy) shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, happy to have an ally against fundamentalist Iran. You'll see Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton shaking hands with Iraqi Ambassador Nizar Hamdoon, happy to be selling Arkansas-grown rice. Go back to 1981 and you'll see the Reagan administration, happy with Iraq's invasion of Iran, criticizing Israel for knocking out an Iraqi nuclear reactor. Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator then, too, and working on developing a nuclear bomb. What do you think? Not everyone can attend a two-hour forum on Iraq. If you'd like to be part of the discussion, send an e-mail to editorial.page@king countyjournal.com or send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish a selection of responses this weekend. Tom Wolfe is editor of the Eastside Journal. His column runs every Tuesday. Readers can reach him by phone 425-453-4230, e-mail tom.wolfe@eastsidejournal.com or fax 425-635-0603. Eastside Journal 1705 132nd Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005-2251 Phone: 425-455-2222 Fax: 425-635-0602 All materials Copyright © Horvitz Newspapers, Inc. Any questions? See ***************************************************************** 50 Judge Knocks GAO Out of Cheney Task Force Lawsuit [http://ens-news.com/events.asp] WASHINGTON, DC, December 9, 2002 (ENS) - The U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress, was refused legal standing by a federal judge today in its attempt to get records related to Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force. Saying it has every legal right to see these records, the GAO is considering an appeal of the decision. [Bates] Federal District Judge John Bates (Photo courtesy DC District Court) Judge John Bates, appointed to the U.S. District Court in December 2001 by President George W. Bush, ruled in Walker v Cheney that the GAO has no standing in the case because it did not suffer any direct harm as a result of the withholding of the documents. Comptroller General of the United States David Walker, who heads the GAO, said the agency might appeal the ruling. “We are very disappointed with the judge’s decision," Walker said. The agency is in the process of reviewing and analyzing the bases and implications of Judge Bates' ruling. Walker said, "We will consider whether or not to appeal after we have completed this review and consulted with Congressional leadership on a bi-partisan basis." The GAO has the right and duty to examine the records of meetings with energy stakeholders at the time when the Cheney Task Force was formulating the National Energy Policy, the investigative agency maintains. [Walker] Comptroller General of the United States David Walker (Photo courtesy GAO [http://www.gao.gov] ) GAO's legislation "clearly authorizes it to perform a basic factual review of the process the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) used to develop the President's national energy strategy," the GAO said today in a statement. "Section 712(1), Title 31, U.S.C., authorizes GAO to investigate "all matters related to the receipt, disbursement, and use of public money," and there is no doubt that public money was used to fund the activities of the NEPDG," the GAO stated. Three other lawsuits are pending, including two by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), to force the White House to turn over the information. One NRDC lawsuit awaits a decision by Judge Paul Friedman which is expected any day. NRDC sued the Energy Department under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for records relating to the energy task force, including minutes of meetings that occurred. Although the Energy Department and other federal agencies have released some information about which cabinet officials met with regarding energy policy, the NRDC said today, the White House has refused to provide similar information. NRDC has argued that the records of Andrew Lundquist, the task force executive director, and other key task force staff, all of whom were Energy Department employees, must be disclosed under FOIA. [Cheney] Vice President Dick Cheney (Photo courtesy DOD [http://www.dod.gov] ) "Judge Bates' decision to shield the activities of Vice President Cheney's secretive energy task force seems to be more about politics than the law," said NRDC attorney Sharon Buccino. The NRDC has also filed a freedom of information case against the Department of Interior (DOI) for records related to the formation and the implementation of the energy task force recommendations. "DOI is already moving forward to expedite energy development on public lands across the West, yet refuses to provide basic information about the decisions the agency is making and who is influencing them," the NRDC said today. Two other civil organizations are using the courts to seek the Energy Task Force records. In the case of Judicial Watch v. National Energy Policy Development Group, the two organizations - Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club - sued the Bush administration for violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which promotes open and balanced government decision making. Judge Emmett Sullivan ordered discovery in this case, but the DC Circuit Court stayed this decision on December 6, pending appeal. Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2002. All Rights ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************