***************************************************************** 04/22/01 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 9.98 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR POWER CONTENTS 1 NGOs offer "ecological doctrine" 2 BRIDGETOWN, Barbados - The international environmental watchdog 3 Life After Death: Chernobyl Today 4 No end to the fallout 5 California eyes nuclear energy 6 Officials plan to search for radioactive materials buried on TSTC 7 Millstone still can't find spent fuel rods 8 Utah site prepares to landfill high-level radioactive waste 9 Goshutes look past the threat 10 DOE chief tries to reassure 11 TVA directors OK nuclear plant upgrades 12 Yankee storage plans get support 13 NRC to meet Entergy on NY FitzPatrick nuke safety 14 Legislature passes bill to delay power plant sale 15 Greens Secure International Opposition To Nuclear Shipments 16 Japan Pwr Chief: Indus To Continue Plutonium-Thermal Proj 17 WIPP Score: 200 Down, 19,100 to Go 18 Jonathan Riskind: Piketon's workers on wild ride 19 Radon warnings being ignored by county residents 20 Caboolture residents oppose proposed nuclear plant 21 Nuclear fuel arrives at Temelin - NUCLEAR WEAPONS CONTENTS 1 French 'weapons grade' exports to Iraq blocked 2 Russia overhauling its icebreaker fleet 3 Report: Israel Arrests Scientist 4 ENERGY DEPARTMENT BUDGET: Nevada spending may rise 5 Committed - Chao reassures nuclear workers ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR POWER ARTICLES ***************************************************************** 1 NGOs offer "ecological doctrine" 20th April, 2001] MOSCOW - Several large Russian environmental groups teamed up Friday with the Worldwide Fund for Nature to present a so-called ecological doctrine for Russia, which it proposed for public discussion prior to forwarding it to the Kremlin for consideration. The draft proposes that the government assume gre ater control over all projects that co uld have an impact on the environment and that it give priority to environmental issues when making economic, political and military decisions. "The lack of a clear government policy directed at environmental safety creates an essential threat to the nation's economic and environmental safety," the WWF said in a statement. The doctrine also says that state ecological experts should enjoy independence from other government institutions - tempering the effects of the government's dissoluti on of the state environmental watchdog committee last year. Among other methods to improve environmental safety, it proposed improvements in the tax system, including new tariffs to encourage that natural resources exports be substituted by the export of processed products. The doctrine calls for efficient energy-saving measures, the closure of nuclear power plants and an end to the construction of new atomic plants. russiajournal.com ***************************************************************** 2 BRIDGETOWN, Barbados - The international environmental watchdog Greenpeace says a secret shipment of "highly radioactive irradiated nuclear fuel" is believed to have entered the Caribbean Sea after passing through the Panama Canal. "The extremely dangerous shipment is now believed to be in the Caribbean, sailing towards the Mona Passage between Puerto Rico and the Dominica Republic on its way to Britain," Greenpeace said in the statement circulated here. Greenpeace has condemned Japanese and British officials for "acting in complete secrecy and against the will of Caribbean and Latin American nations". It said the ship, reported to have entered Caribbean waters on Wednesday, contains fuel from the Tokai nuclear reactor in Japan. The reactor is situated near a processing plant which was the site of a massive nuclear accident on September 30, 1999 that killed two and required 310 000 residents to be sealed in their homes, Greenpeace said. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c 01 St Vincent and Grenadines Herald ***************************************************************** 3 Life After Death: Chernobyl Today April 22, 2001 By FELICITY BARRINGER ONE face of the Chernobyl disaster is mostly forgotten — the face of disbelief. Disbelief guided the actions of Aleksandr Akimov, a panicked nuclear engineer, from the time that his reactor, Unit 4 of the Chernobyl power generating complex, exploded at 1:23 a.m. on April 26, 1986. From inside the control room, he had seen the reaction going out of control. The control rods he sought to lower into the reactor jammed. He felt the concussions of two explosions and sent two colleagues to lower the rods by hand. They returned, faces turning brown from lethal doses of radiation. There were no control rods, they said. And no reactor. Mr. Akimov did not believe them. For hours, he and his bosses told Moscow that the reactor was intact. From the moment of the world's worst nuclear accident, denial and misinformation were the rule. It has been 15 years since Mr. Akimov and 28 others — firemen and plant workers — died of radiation poisoning. The concrete sarcophagus built to contain the radio- active hulk of Unit 4 leaks. The last operating reactor at the plant shut down in December. Scientists still argue over how many people died from Chernobyl's radiation: dozens, or thousands? Some survivors have cancer. Others have weakened immune systems, a syndrome the locals dubbed "Chernobyl AIDS." Land within an 18-mile radius of the plant was to remain uninhabited. But some people don't believe in the danger of radiation. Scavengers steal parts from helicopters that flew into the radioactive fire's plume. Fishermen cast their lines in the forbidden waters of the Pripyat River. Perhaps 400 elderly villagers have returned to live in the zone. One, Natasha Chikalovets, asked a reporter from The Christian Science Monitor last year, "What is radiation? We didn't feel it then, we don't feel it now." Her neighbor once dug up her garden looking for radiation. She saw none. She stayed. New York Times Newspaper. ***************************************************************** 4 No end to the fallout [Thestar.com] ** Apr. 22, 2001. 01:01 AM Fifteen years later, children in Belarus bear the brunt of the Chernobyl disaster Menno Meijer SPECIAL TO THE STAR MINSK - IT IS A catastrophe of global proportions: A silent, unseen killer is slowly creeping its way out of Belarus and into surrounding countries. It is destroying the future of 10 million people in Belarus who struggle daily with the effects of radiation. It's the children who suffer the most. When reactor Number 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine exploded 15 years ago Thursday, it burned for days while officials kept silent. May Day celebrations were nearing and the Soviet government said little. The wind sent the radioactive cloud into Belarus, whose border with Ukraine lies 10 kilometres north of the plant, and the rain washed it from the sky onto an unsuspecting people. Here in Minsk, the capital of Belarus, soccer players became sick as the rain fell. Spectators, too, became ill. No one knew what was happening to them. A 6-year-old girl walking home from school in the rain was met at the door by her frantic mother. The woman was a surgeon at a children's hospital and had heard the rumour about radioactive fallout. She washed her daughter and kept the doors and windows shut. The child lost most of her hair. The heaviest contamination fell in the Mogilev and Gomel regions, in the southeast corner of Belarus. In areas close to Chernobyl, many people were evacuated immediately, although most had nowhere to go. But it would be five years before people in areas a little farther away were evacuated. Some of the most heavily contaminated communities have since been bulldozed to keep people from returning to their homes. The countryside is poison now. Wherever houses remained, the old people returned. They grow crops and raise livestock. But the children are gone. There are no birds in the trees. In other areas, there was no evacuation. Children are fed at the schools with food the state considers safe, but they play in schoolyards with high radiation levels. They breath the dust, they ingest the poison. The children are sick. Suffering with what is often called Chernobyl AIDS, their immune systems are failing. This has led to a sharp rise in stomach and intestinal diseases, heart disease, anemia, endemic goitre, vision problems and cancer. Children exposed to the fallout in the first few days after the reactor explosion received high doses of radioactive iodine. They are now victims of thyroid cancer, which is growing at a rate of 100 cases annually. Each day at the thyroid cancer clinic in Minsk, doctors operate on seven or eight patients. In the 11 years before the blast, there were 1,392 cases of thyroid cancer in the general population. In the 11-year period following, there were 5,449 cases, most of them children. The rate of absenteeism in the schools is about 10 per cent owing to illness. Many studies point to a large increase in birth defects and genetic mutation. On top of everything else, Belarus is in economic crisis with skyrocketing inflation. In the first year after Chernobyl, the tiny country spent 20 per cent of its annual budget on fighting the fallout. Now, it allots only 5 per cent. In orphanages, children live with small portions of food and, in most cases, without toilet paper or soap to wash. When they turn 17, they are released, but they have nowhere to go. The incidence of suicide among those who leave the orphanages is 17 per cent, while 35 per cent end up in jail. Often, children arrive at the orphanages after their penniless parents - many of them alcoholics - desert them. But as long as they have family, the children can't be adopted. In a sanatorium in the Vitebsk region, 150 children live for up to three years tied to their beds so a disease affecting their hip joints can heal. For want of a leg brace worth $4,200, they could go home. Instead, they are lined in rows in rooms resembling classrooms where they eat, sleep and study. On collective farms, workers often go months without their pay, which usually is only about $20 a month. One woman gets up at 4:30 a.m. to go to work in a dairy farm until 8 p.m. She works seven days a week and in 12 years has had only one four-week vacation. She is 33 and looks a well-worn 50. Her children come to the farm after school to see her and play in the muck while she milks emaciated cows fed meagre portions of nutrient-poor, contaminated silage. The cows produce only about three litres each milking. Some milk is too contaminated to process at the local plant, but the woman is allowed to take it home to her hungry children. It is deducted from her wages. Some orphanages are sponsored by groups such as Canadian Aid for Chernobyl, which provides clothes, soap, toilet paper and money for renovations. But foreign aid can't keep up with the need. Used incubators at the Minsk children's hospital were donated several years ago by Switzerland but are falling apart. Just $7,000 a year would repair the equipment. The technology is available to clean up the contamination. Caesium 135, which was released into the atmosphere by the explosion, has a radioactive half-life of 2 million years. That can be reduced to just 2* days by shooting neutrons into it, and the nuclear research centre in Minsk has the largest neutron generator in the world. Plants with large root systems can be used to extract radioactive material from the soil and the top layer of soil can be scraped off and neutralized by the neutron generator. But the price tag for decontamination is about $500 billion. And until the world is ready to accept the reality of the situation in Belarus, the population will continue to slide toward extinction - and the fallout will spread. *Menno Meijer is a freelance photographer and reporter based in London, Ont. He recently returned from a trip to Belarus.* Legal Notice:- Copyright 1996-2001. Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, ***************************************************************** 5 California eyes nuclear energy Power crisis forces state to mull unpopular options [Reuters] SAN FRANCISCO, April 20 — The unthinkable is happening: California’s power crisis is helping spark renewed interest in the nearly taboo subject of nuclear power, even in this environmentally conscious state. “INVESTORS ARE INCREASINGLY looking at nuclear as an attractive asset for utilities to own rather than a liability like before,” James Asselstine, a managing director with Lehman Brothers, told Reuters at a recent nuclear conference here. Utilities are lining up to extend the lives of their nuclear units, and some are assessing building new reactors. “I think you could see an application to build a new nuclear power plant in the United States within the next five years,” said Asseltine, who was invited to speak at a conference sponsored by the Washington D.C.-based industry group Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). California regulators open investigation The watchdog Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has not received a new plant application since the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident put a freeze on the industry. In the past two decades, construction was halted on more than 40 nuclear units that had received NRC permission to build, and others were shut down after starting operations due to cost overruns and safety concerns, a NRC spokeswoman said. The last construction permit issued by the NRC — in 1973 — was for the government-owned Tennessee Valley Authority’s 1,170-megawatt Watts Bar facility in Spring City, Tenn., which began operating in 1996. But the nuclear frost is now starting to thaw. Nuclear experts expect most, if not all, of the nation’s 103 nuclear units, which supply about 20 percent of U.S. energy needs, to extend their 40-year operating licenses by 20 years. So far, the NRC says it has approved 20-year extensions for five nuclear units, has received applications to extend five more, and expects applications from about 33 additional ones. CALIFORNIA — A HARD NUT Two top Silicon Valley leaders have even said quietly that California should take another look at nuclear power after a 1996 flawed deregulation law and supply crunch sent wholesale power prices skyrocketing, triggered rolling blackouts, and prompted the state’s top utility to file for bankruptcy. Scott McNealy, co-founder and chairman of Palo Alto-based high-tech giant Sun Microsystems, Inc. , lamented over the country’s steep energy costs and California’s almost daily power alerts declaring precariously low supplies. “It’s like a Third World nation out there in the Bay area,” said McNealy, referring to the alerts in a speech to the National Press Club in Washington D.C. earlier this year. “I’m going to do the politically incorrect thing and tell you the answer’s going to be nuclear power.” Santa Clara-based Intel Corp. chief executive, Craig Barret, head of the world’s No. 1 computer chip maker, has also said nuclear power is one of the answers to the states’s energy crisis, although it’s not politically correct. California has only two nuclear plants, which account for nearly 15 percent of its energy needs. Although residents may have developed a greater appreciation for them after the power crisis, the Golden State will be a hard nut to crack. “California is probably the worst place to build anything, not just a nuclear power plant,” said Marvin Fertel, NEI senior vice president of business operations. And memories remain. California’s two-unit, 2,200-megawatt Diablo Canyon nuclear plant was redesigned twice: once after an earthquake fault was discovered near the site, and later when engineers read the blueprints backwards. The final bill for the plant exceeded projections by several billion dollars. Then in 1989, residents of Sacramento County in California voted to close down a nuclear plant. The Rancho Seco plant was the first — and only — operating nuclear power station in the United States to be shut down as the result of a local referendum. OPPORTUNITIES AND OBSTACLES Experts say the first new nuclear plants will probably be built on existing sites in the Southeast or Midwest where nuclear opposition is less strong than places like California. Source: Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets Advocates have always touted nuclear power as a source of abundant and relatively cheap fuel that is also “clean” because it does not produce any greenhouse gas emissions. Now several recent changes are helping their cause. Prices of other fuels are rising, prompting calls for diversifying fuel sources, and the industry has also improved its safety record and performance and cut production costs. And a new, streamlined licensing process for future nuclear units ensures that all major design, safety, siting and other regulatory issues are resolved as early as possible — before construction begins and billions of dollars are spent. This is possible because the new NRC process uses standardized plant designs that are pre-approved, which means future nuclear plants will be almost fully designed when they are ordered, which should cut down the lead time between proposing and constructing a nuclear reactor. “There is an air of optimism in the industry,” Wes Taylor, president of generation at TXU Corp. , a leading energy services company based in Texas, told the NEI conference. But he added: “The question of when a new power plant may be ordered is less easy to predict. More reforms are need before the barriers are entirely removed.” California's power problems pose a serious economic and safety risk. No new nuclear plants have been proposed since the reformed NRC licensing process was introduced in 1992, which means the new system still needs to be tested, nuclear experts say. A solution to the U.S. nuclear waste storage problem still needs to be found and capital costs remain high, they add. And of course, public confidence remains key. “When it comes to nuclear power, not much has really changed. The problems of nuclear waste disposal, reactor safety and siting remain,” said Carl Zichella, the California’s regional staff director of the Sierra Club, vowing to fight ”hammer and tongs” against any new nuclear plants. “Nuclear is a technology that has had its day.” *© 2001 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 6 Officials plan to search for radioactive materials buried on TSTC campus [AccessWaco.com] **** *By RICHARD L. SMITH/Tribune-Herald staff writer* Federal officials say a search is planned for radioactive materials that are possibly buried on the Texas State Technical College campus. Investigators from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will likely begin looking next month in an area where radium-illuminated aircraft instrument dials were reportedly encased in cement. The equipment was believed to have been discarded when the campus was formerly James Connally Air Force Base. "Before we do anything we will go in and do an investigation with instruments to detect radioactivity in the soil and groundwater if there is any," said Walter Kneib, a Corps project engineer in their Tulsa, Okla., district office. "If any is in the soil, we will get an idea of how extensive the problem is and an idea on how to move it." Corps officials said it will likely cost something less than $1 million to investigate and remove the radium, provided it is buried there. A TSTC official refused to reveal the location of the site where the material is supposed to be buried in concrete. "I don't want to release that information since I do not have it completely fenced off," said Rhett Redell, TSTC safety officer. "It's in a restricted runway area. I don't want people going over there and getting hurt and it being a liability." The investigation is part of a program authorized by Congress to provide environmental restoration at former military bases, Kneib said. He said the Corps knew about the possibility of buried radium at the college since late 1998. However, any action was delayed until funding was approved. "Once we have identified sites, we have to wait for funding to address them," Kneib said. "The funding is spread over projects across the country and we have to compete with other projects." Radium is a naturally-occurring radioactive metal. Information from the Centers for Disease Control indicates that radium can enter the body when breathed in or swallowed. It is not known if the substance can be absorbed through the skin. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has determined that radium is a human carcinogen. Kneib said researchers from Texas A &M University had taken radiation readings at the TSTC site in the past and detected no measurable quantities. The property on which TSTC, its airport and surrounding entities, such as Raytheon, is located was once part of the Air Force base. At its peak in the mid-1950s, the base was home to more than 7,000 military and civilian personnel. When it closed in 1966, the facility had about 2,400 military and 830 civilian employees. Former Gov. John Connally asked the Texas Legislature to buy the old base and start James Connally Technical Institute under Texas A &M. The institute had become an independent entity by 1969. Kneib said the investigation will include boring holes in the ground at the site to determine any radioactivity. "Hopefully, everything will come out benign, but we won't know until we punch holes and take samples," he said. Probing of the area will likely begin sometime during the latter part of May. Richard Smith can be reached at rsmith@wacotrib.com or at 757-5745. © 2001 &Waco-Tribune Herald | ***************************************************************** 7 Millstone still looking for missing fuel rods [Geoff Hausman] By Paul Choiniere - More Articles Published on 4/22/2001 Waterford — Personnel at the Millstone 1 nuclear plant have been unable to locate two highly radioactive fuel rods first discovered missing six months ago during an inventory of the nuclear waste storage pool at the closed plant. On Monday, Millstone officials will provide the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with an update on the investigation into and search for the two spent fuel rods. It is the first such meeting since Dominion Nuclear Connecticut assumed ownership of the Millstone Nuclear Power Station from Northeast Utilities earlier this month. The meeting is set for 1 p.m. at NRC regional headquarters in King of Prussia, Pa. A Millstone spokesman, Pete Hyde, declined Friday to outline what company officials plan to tell the NRC Monday. Hyde did confirm, however, that the fuel rods have not been located and the search continues. In November, NU reported that a record review revealed that the two spent fuel rods, previously documented as having been stored in the spent fuel storage pool, could not be located. NU launched a search for the fuel rods, including a visual inspection of storage racks in the pool using remote-control cameras. Thousands of records are being reviewed and former employees interviewed. NU has agreed to continue funding the cost of the search and to cover the cost of any penalties. If the fuel rods were moved out of the plant it would be a violation of federal regulations. There is no approved site for the disposal of spent fuel rods, classified as high-level nuclear waste. The slender metal fuel rods are filled with enriched uranium pellets, about a half-inch in diameter and 13 feet long. They were removed from the reactor in 1972. Millstone officials have said the two fuel rods might have been moved to a different location in the spent fuel storage pool and the change not properly recorded. Or they could have been accidentally shipped off site to low-level radioactive waste dumps in either South Carolina or the state of Washington. In either case, they say, the rods should be safely contained. According to those officials, if the fuel rods had been moved without an insulated storage canister to block the radiation, alarms would have sounded. © 1998-2001 The Day Publishing Co. ***************************************************************** 8 Utah site prepares to landfill high-level radioactive waste Waste News: Waste management, landfill, and recycling industry resources TOOELE, UTAH (April 19) -- The Utah Division of Radiation Control recently cited the Envirocare of Utah landfill for violations in monitoring low-level radioactive solid waste. But Envirocare remains on the brink of clearing the first of two government-review hurdles for its application to landfill high-level radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. William Sinclair, director of the state agency, said the citation involves only paperwork problems and does not have any adverse impact on the company´s application to landfill high-level radioactive waste. "The bottom line is, we don´t have any reason to suspect that there is a ground water issue at the site," Sinclair said. "There is no evidence of contamination." The company´s reporting on monitor wells needs to improve, but "we´re talking about 76 wells and some 40,000-plus measurements per year," Sinclair said. Eighty miles southwest of Salt Lake City off Interstate 80, the 640-acre landfill in Tooele County accepts 10 million cubic yards per year of solid waste with low-level radioactivity from industrial, mining, drilling and government research operations, Envirocare President Charles Judd said. *Entire contents copyright 2001 by Crain Communications Inc. ***************************************************************** 9 Goshutes look past the threat [deseretnews.com] April 22, 2001 By Lee Benson Deseret News columnist The Goshutes just won't let it go, will they? The 112-member Indian tribe that is determined to turn its west desert reservation into a nuclear landfill filed suit in federal court this past week against the governor, the state, the attorney general and the transportation commission, among others. At issue are recently passed state laws intended to act as an effective roadblock to spent nuclear rods and other high-level radioactive waste ever entering the borders of the great state of Utah. The Legislature has indeed been busy implementing a strong defensive plan. Imagine having Dick Butkus, Dikembe Mutombo and Mr. T guarding the border, with the U.S. Marines as backup. The Goshutes think these laws are in violation of not only the U.S. Constitution but also their rights as a sovereign nation — which is in itself kind of an interesting double-barrelled legal complaint when you stop and think about it. And they're willing and able to slug it out in court — thanks to the estimable financial backing of Private Fuel Storage, the company that wants to use the tribe's land as a nuclear dumping ground. From the start, the pitch to the Goshutes from Private Fuel Storage has basically been this: Our dump will be a lot more attractive than rusted-out cars, and did we mention the part about it making you fabulously wealthy? The problem, of course, is the subject matter. Of all the 50 states in the union, Utah is the last place words like "radioactivity" and "fallout" can be tossed around unless you're looking for a fistfight. Utahns hear the word "nuclear" and go nuclear and for good reason. We have, as a matter of fact, been a dumping ground already, and you know what, it didn't feel good. For decades of testing, first above-ground and then below-ground, nuclear fallout wafted across the southern desert, taking a terrible and verifiable toll in southern Utah and a lesser and not as verifiable toll in the rest of the state. Who knows how many cases of multiple sclerosis, leukemia, cancer, skin and respiratory conditions and outright death are the result? Who knows how many innocent yet-to-be-born children will have bad stuff in their DNA because of the dangers of being close to things nuclear? Problems from the Nevada Test Site aren't alone. In the west desert, not far from the Goshutes' land, the Army stores all kinds of hazardous materials. A few years ago, some nerve gas leaked out and killed 6,000 sheep. Who knows how many human lives it disrupted? In southwestern Utah, unchecked uranium mining in the '40s, '50s and '60s brought problems to thousands. The worst of the damage was incurred by legions of Navajo Indians who worked shift after shift in the mines with no protective clothing and, worse, nobody telling them about the danger. Now, there is an epidemic of medical problems in the Navajo Nation, all related to nuclear fallout. The Goshutes and their paleface partners with their deep pockets and their law firms on retainer wax righteously indignant. The government says their facility is safe, they rail in court. Yeah, well, the government said the Nevada Test Site and the Moab mines were safe, too. I like what the governor says, and I agree with him: The Goshutes will bring in nuclear waste over our dead bodies. One way or another. *Lee Benson's column runs Sunday, Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Please send e-mail to benson@desnews.comand faxes to 801-237-2527.* ***************************************************************** 10 DOE chief tries to reassure Albuquerque Tribune Online: News N.M. lab employees Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham described the morale of the Los Alamos workers as "very positive." By Barry Massey The Associated Press LOS ALAMOS -- The head of the Energy Department has taken his first tour of Los Alamos National Laboratory, a nuclear weapons lab recovering from a national security scandal and confronting proposed budget cuts. Cerro Grande Fire victims being taken care of faster, FEMA boss says "What the trip today has so far done is reinforce my pride in and confidence in the people who work in our labs," Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said at a news conference Thursday. "These are . . . the crown jewels in terms of American science," said Abraham, whose department oversees the nation's nuclear weapons complex. Abraham, a former U.S. senator from Michigan, made an aerial tour of lab property to view damage from last spring's wildfire. Abraham, who earlier in the day visited Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, met with Los Alamos employees and visited its facilities, including Tech Area 55, which is used for processing and storage of plutonium. President Bush has recommended spending cuts in the Energy Department next year. The agency's proposed budget calls for a 16 percent reduction at Los Alamos, which would lower spending to about $1.4 billion. Some of the largest proposed cutbacks were in construction and operations stemming from last year's Cerro Grande Fire. Abraham stressed that the budget proposes an increase in the agency's military-related work, including that at Los Alamos. The administration is reviewing department programs to determine long-term energy and military policy, and Abraham suggested that could lead to a greater focus on the work at Los Alamos. The lab is recovering from rough times because of a devastating wildlife in the Los Alamos area last year, a security scandal involving missing computer equipment and the Wen Ho Lee case. Abraham described the morale of lab employees as "very positive." "I think the people recognize that safety and security and scientific achievement can go hand in hand, and I conveyed to them my confidence in the people here and in their ability to both meet the security challenges as well as the professional challenges that we have as a nation," he said. The visits to Sandia and Los Alamos were Abraham's first since taking over the DOE. The department operates 17 major research laboratories, including Los Alamos and Sandia. Mary J. Byrne, who works in community affairs for the DOE's Los Alamos office, said Abraham's visit sent a message of support to lab workers. "It does help the morale of the employees, the fact that he choose Los Alamos to come and talk with them. He was very upbeat. He didn't do any scolding," Byrne said. Lee, a Taiwan-born U.S. citizen who worked at Los Alamos for more than two decades, was accused of 59 counts of downloading restricted data. After nine months in solitary confinement, Lee pleaded guilty to a single felony count of mishandling data in September, the government dropped all other counts, and he was freed. The Cerro Grande Fire, which roared through the community of Los Alamos in May, left 400 families homeless and burned more than 42,000 acres, including nearly 8,000 on lab property. The fire burned five of six old buildings that housed the Manhattan Project that built the first atomic bomb during World War II and destroyed a cluster of temporary lab buildings. At the peak of the fire, the entire Los Alamos area -- an estimated 25,000 people -- was evacuated. As the fire moved onto lab property, two computer hard drives of secret information about nuclear weapons were found missing from a vault in the lab's top secret X Division. Eventually, the drives were discovered behind a copier in a secure area previously searched. The Los Alamos Lab was established by the government in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb. Today, the lab covers about 43 square miles and has more than 2,000 buildings. The lab's main mission remains nuclear weapons research and maintenance of the nation's nuclear stockpile, but it operates a wide range of nonweapons programs including climate modeling and human genome studies. © The Albuquerque Tribune. ***************************************************************** 11 TVA directors OK nuclear plant upgrades Work will cost nearly $157 million April 21, 2001 By Bruce Schreiner, Associated Press HOPKINSVILLE, Ky. -- Tennessee Valley Authority directors have approved a plan to boost production at two nuclear plants to help meet electricity demand that is outpacing the national average. The upgrades to the Sequoyah plant in Tennessee and Browns Ferry in Alabama will cost nearly $157 million and increase generating capacity at the two plants by nearly 6 percent. A portion of the additional power could begin reaching TVA customers by 2003, and all the improvements are expected to be completed by the middle of 2005. The TVA directors also approved Wednesday a nearly $23 million contract with Lafayette Coal Co. in Pike County, Ind., to supply more than 720,000 tons of coal to the Gallatin Fossil Plant near Nashville. Demand for electricity in the Tennessee Valley is growing at about 3 percent each year, compared to the national average of 2 percent. The upgrades at the two nuclear plants will add a total of 266 megawatts of generating capacity -- 240 megawatts at Browns Ferry and 26 at Sequoyah -- enough to power more than 50,000 homes. The Sequoyah plant is in Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., about 20 miles north of Chattanooga. Browns Ferry is in Athens, Ala., near Huntsville. This week's meeting was the first since Craven Crowell's retirement after eight years as TVA chairman. The two remaining directors -- Glenn McCullough and Skila Harris -- said they will take turns presiding at board meetings until a new chairman is named by the Bush administration. McCullough and Harris said that making improvements to existing facilities is a cost-effective way to increase TVA's power capacity and keep it competitive with other power suppliers. TVA also is boosting electricity production by upgrading turbines at 88 hydroelectric stations. Those upgrades will raise production by at least 5 percent. TVA, the country's largest public utility, provides electricity to 8 million people in Tennessee, North Carolina, Kentucky, Virginia, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. Meanwhile, the Washington-based lobbying group TVA Watch announced Wednesday it was changing its name to TVA Exchange to reflect what it calls a new mission. The group is made up of a coalition of private sector energy companies around the Tennessee Valley that say they are "concerned about the role of TVA in a changing electric power market." Over the past few years, the group has focused on making sure TVA didn't try to sell power outside its federally mandated jurisdiction. But lately the group has shifted its emphasis toward urging Congress to pass legislation that would require the quasi-governmental agency to be structured more like an investor-owned utility. Copyright © 2000, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 12 Yankee storage plans get support *April 20, 2001* By MEGGAN CLARK Reformer Staff VERNON -- Perhaps the most uncontroversial project in Vermont Yankee's history, plans to build a hydrogen storage facility at the Vernon reactor, received only support at a public hearing Thursday night. The public comments, including Yankee liaison engineer David McElwee's presentation, lasted a full 10 minutes. The hearing is part of the Public Service Board's review of the project, which requires a certificate of public good. Yankee already uses hydrogen to cool its generator, the mechanism that converts the motion of steam-spun turbines into electricity. The gas is kept in steel cylinders in a small building near the turbine building, close to the physical plant. The proposed facility would be larger. A fenced-in cement slab several hundred feet south of the cooling towers, in what is now a tangle of brush and humped-up ground, would hold a tractor trailer carrying up to a dozen hydrogen tanks. An underground line would transport the hydrogen, in gaseous form, to the turbine building. There, the line would split. Some of the hydrogen would continue to flow into the generator, replacing that from the steel cylinders. The rest, however, would go into the reactor building, where it would be pumped into the cooling water itself. The hydrogen lines the water pipes and bonds with loose oxygen molecules to form water, preventing corrosion. According to McElwee, the use of hydrogen as an anti-corrosive is relatively new, having been in use only about a decade. The $3 million facility would increase the amount of hydrogen Yankee uses roughly 20 times, from .2 cubic feet a minute to 4 cubic feet per minute. But it wouldn't increase the number of hydrogen deliveries to the Vernon reactor. Geoffrey Commons, speaking for the department of public service, said the department had not yet taken a position on the planned facility. The department advocates for Vermont citizens before the board. "Because we are a representative of the public, we are particularly interested in comment from the public," he said. But the only comment from the public was a letter from the Vernon selectboard, read by Selectman Jim Polhemus. The board thanked Yankee for being a good corporate citizen and said the project would have no adverse affect on the town. "We'd like to give our blessing to this project," Polhemus said. The meeting was attended by about 25 people, most of whom were state officials or nuclear executives. Before the 7 p.m. hearing, the group, wearing boots, had toured the proposed site and walked the path of the underground pipe. Board Chairman Michael Dworkin, with a project engineer, battled raspberry bushes and brush to see the actual site of the proposed concrete pad. The rest of the group walked around. NewsChoice.com ***************************************************************** 13 NRC to meet Entergy on NY FitzPatrick nuke safety [Reuters] Friday April 20, 1:23 pm Eastern Time NEW YORK, April 20 (Reuters) - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) said Friday its staff will meet with Entergy Nuclear on April 27 to discuss safety concerns at the FitzPatrick nuclear reactor in New York. Specifically, the NRC said it wanted to talk about Entergy's progress on and plans for addressing the number of unplanned power changes at the plant. The NRC issued a ``white'' performance indicator to FitzPatrick, indicating there are continued problems with equipment reliability that have impacted plant operations. Under the NRC Reactor Oversight Process launched in April 2000, the agency uses several tools to assess plant performance. Among those tools are performance indicators, which utilize different colors to depict increasing safety significance. The colors range from green, which means performance in an expected range, rising to white, which is considered performance outside the expected range, to yellow and finally red. For instance, if a plant has six or more unplanned power changes during a specified period, it receives a ``white'' indicator. The specified period of operations is 7,000 hours. An unplanned power change is a change greater than 20 percent, but not including an automatic or manual shutdown. These problems extend back several years, the NRC said in a statement, referring also to the time when the New York Power Authority owned the plant. Entergy Nuclear, a unit of Entergy Corp. (NYSE:ETR - news) of New Orleans, completed the purchase of the Power Authority's nuclear plants in November 2000. --Scott DiSavino, New York Power Desk, +212-859-1622, fax +212-859-1758, e-mail scott.disavino@reuters.com ***************************************************************** 14 Legislature passes bill to delay power plant sale April 20, 2001 By LORI AYOTTE Associated Press Writer CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — In a move to head off California-style electric problems, the New Hampshire Legislature pushed through a bill Thursday to modify a deregulation agreement with Public Service Company of New Hampshire. The bill postpones the sale of some of Public Service’s plants for 33 months so their cheaper power can be used to keep rates from spiking upwards. Under current law, Public Service is required to sell its power plants as part of the agreement to deregulate its service area. The law calls for it to sell the plants by July 1. The bill only affects Public Service’s fossil fuel and hydroelectric plants. It does not stop the utility from selling the Seabrook nuclear plant. Rep. Jeb Bradley said the bill is needed because there isn’t a competitive market for electricity. Unless the change is made to the agreement, Public Service customers face huge price increases from energy prices that began rising after California utilities had trouble keeping the lights on for their customers. The law now requires Public Service to provide power from its existing plants to commercial and industrial customers during a nine-month transition after competition begins May 1. The customers then have to buy power at market prices. The change increases the transition from nine to 33 months. Although lawmakers have argued customers need to be protected, some energy brokers say lengthening the transition further delays competition because other energy suppliers can’t match low transition service prices. The transition service rate is set at $4.4 cents per kilowatt hour for the first 21 months — almost half the current market rate. Afterward, Public Service can set the rate with state regulators’ approval. Bradley asked the House to pass the bill immediately, so the changes are made before Public Service sells $525 million in bonds to refinance part of its debt at lower cost — a benefit to the utility and ratepayers. The bond sale also was part of the deregulation agreement. Ratepayers are to pay them back over time. Lawmakers feared if they waited, Public Service might not be able to sell the bonds at as low an interest rate. The refinancing triggers a rate reduction for customers and starts competition in Public Service’s service area. Public Service can continue with plans to sell the Seabrook nuclear plant, whose value has increased since the California energy crisis. Public Service’s ratepayers will benefit from a higher selling price since it means less money they will have to pay in so-called "stranded costs" — past investments in power plants and contracts the utility probably could not recover in a competitive market. The bill also gives residential customers an additional year of transition service. They could buy power at the transition rate for five years. The bill also would allow all utilities to increase a charge to fund low-income assistance and energy conservation programs. The increase is a 1/10 of a cent, and would amount to an additional 10 cents for every $100 on an electric bill. Bradley cited the energy crisis in California and in other states as a reason to pursue conservation programs. © 2001 Geo. J. Foster Co. ***************************************************************** 15 Greens Secure International Opposition To Nuclear Shipments Press Release by Green Party at 2:42pm, 20th April 2001 Green MP Ian Ewen-Street has secured international opposition to the shipment of nuclear cargoes through other countries exclusive economic zones at the international Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) meeting in Havana early this month. Mr Ewen-Street moved an amendment to a resolution calling for a ban on weapons of mass destruction to also include 'a complete ban... on the transportation of the components of weapons of mass destruction through the air space and / or the exclusive economic zones of other countries'. "I am absolutely thrilled that delegates from parliaments from 140 countries agreed unanimously to this amendment," said Mr Ewen-Street. "At a time when the Prime Minister is refusing to support a Green Party Bill which seeks to keep increasing numbers of nuclear shipments out of our waters because it would violate international law, it is heartening to see representatives from parliaments all around the world agree with us in saying that the International Law of the Sea is being interpreted to work against countries' rights to protect their environments and people." Mr Ewen-Street said that the IPU decision was in line with the finding by the International Court of Justice that nuclear weapons are illegal. "It is time the Law of the Sea was clarified to ensure that the right of innocent passage cannot be interpreted to include nuclear ships," he said. "Now what we really need to see is Prime Ministers and parliaments all around the world putting this resolution into action," said Mr Ewen-Street. "Nuclear shipments are a real threat to the health of people and environments and should not be given automatic access to countries EEZ's. Countries like New Zealand who are going to be put at increasing risk from more and more nuclear shipments should have every right to say no." Mr Ewen-Street said he was puzzled as to how the Prime Minister was going to campaign for a nuclear free world if she was not prepared to tackle the international transport of nuclear materials which supported the nuclear industry and put nations like New Zealand at unacceptable risk. ENDS ***************************************************************** 16 Japan Pwr Chief: Indus To Continue Plutonium-Thermal Proj Friday, April 20 6:42 PM SGT TOKYO (Dow Jones)--The head of Japan's electric power industry body said Friday that Japanese power companies will try hard to realize the proposed plutonium-thermal project for the sake of the country's stable future power supply. "The president of each company reconfirmed today (Friday) that we will aim to conduct the plutonium-thermal (project) at 16 to 18 reactors by the year 2010," Hiroji Ota, chairman of Japan's Federation of Electric Power Companies, told reporters. Ota said the most important issue to tackle is to earn support from local governments for the project. He said the power industry will begin loading the controversial plutonium-uranium mixed oxide, or MOX fuel, at nuclear reactors if it gains support from local authorities. "Although the front runner (for the project) is trapped in a tough situation, the only hurdle is local affairs," he said of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (J.TER or 9501). "Safety and technology issues have already been cleared." Tokyo Electric Power, or Tepco, Friday gave up what would have been Japan's first project to use plutonium-uranium mixed oxide, or MOX fuel, at its Fukushima Daiichi power station in Fukushima Prefecture, northern Japan, because of strong opposition from a local government. The decision cast gloom over Tepco's second plutonium-thermal project at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power station in Niigata Prefecture, northern Japan. Tepco has until mid-June to decide whether it can load MOX fuel at its No. 3 1,100-megawatt reactor at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa. Ota said the power industry will work with the government to press forward with the plutonium-thermal project, in which a composite fuel made of plutonium extracted from spent fuel and uranium would be used at nuclear reactors. Japan's power industry has advocated the need for the resource-scarce country to establish a nuclear fuel cycle. But public objection against nuclear power mounted in the last two years, brought about by a slew of alarming nuclear power-related accidents. Copyright 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.* ***************************************************************** 17 WIPP Score: 200 Down, 19,100 to Go Saturday, April 21, 2001 Albuquerque Journal--> *The Associated Press* CARLSBAD — The federal government's nuclear waste repository east of here has received its 200th shipment of radioactive waste. The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, which accepted its first shipment in March 1999, was designed to permanently store plutonium-contaminated waste more than 2,100 feet underground in ancient salt beds. The waste — such things as contaminated clothing, tools, debris and residue — comes from the nation's defense complex. The 200th shipment arrived Wednesday from the Energy Department's Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site in Colorado. Coincidentally, the 100th shipment that arrived last October also came from Rocky Flats. "This marks another major milestone for WIPP as we work toward cleanup of transuranic waste at DOE sites across the country," said Ines Triay, manager of DOE's Carlsbad office, which runs the WIPP program. Since beginning disposal operations, WIPP has received shipments from Rocky Flats, the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory in northern New Mexico and the Hanford site in Washington state. During the next 35 years, WIPP officials expect to transport about 19,300 loads of radioactive waste from more than 20 locations nationwide. WIPP has two sets of rooms to bury nuclear waste in the underground salt beds. Each disposal room is 300 feet long, 33 feet wide and 13 feet high and each will hold the equivalent of 12,000 55-gallon drums of waste. Copyright Albuquerque Journal ***************************************************************** 18 Jonathan Riskind: Piketon's workers on wild ride *Sunday, April 22, 2001* Jonathan Riskind *Dispatch Washington Bureau Chief* The 1,700 workers at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, and thousands of people throughout southern Ohio whose economic well-being is tied to the plant, must feel like they're a yo-yo. One minute they're up, such as when the federal government finally approves a compensation program for nuclear workers harmed by radioactive conditions. The next minute they're down, such as when the new secretary of labor tries to shift responsibility for running the program to the same Justice Department that helped make a hash of a similar program for uranium miners. And when Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao agreed last week to run the program, she called for pushing back the July 31 start date. Chao claims otherwise, but the delay might not have been needed if she hadn't spent weeks trying to shed responsibility for the program. Piketon workers also were up when the Clinton administration announced an election-year $630-million plan to keep the plant on "cold standby'' for an advanced-technology program after the plant is closed in June. Then they were down when the Bush administration decided to put the Clinton plan on hold, but they were yanked halfway up when some short- term standby money was released with a vague promise of more to come. The past two weeks saw another gut-twisting episode for plant workers, who produced weapons-grade uranium for the nation's atomic defense program, and then manufactured commercial-grade material to fuel nuclear power plants, which supply 20 percent of the country's electricity. Plans announced earlier this month called for 526 workers to be let go when the plant ceases operations. That's a lot of lost paychecks, but it beats losing 1,700 jobs. The 1,200 workers who would be kept on would run shipping operations, keep the plant on standby and so forth. But then USEC, the privatized federal corporation that is shutting down Piketon, told workers that Energy Department money to pay for post-closure cleanup work on the plant's enrichment equipment might not be forthcoming. That would mean letting go 170 more people. Well, apparently that was a little war of wills between USEC and the Energy Department. Each thought the other was responsible for paying for the cleanup. In the end, the Energy Department agreed to pay, but only after workers spent a few days sweating out the possibility of more layoffs. It's not like the jobs left after the plant shuts down have any long-term guarantees attached to them. The cold standby money is promised only until Sept. 30, 2002, the end of the 2002 federal fiscal year. The Bush administration hasn't committed to a long-term standby plan, or promised to launch an advanced-technology program at the site. Hundreds more jobs would be lost without the standby money. And the cleanup money also could be cut off after the 2002 fiscal year. Piketon's long-term future appears to be tied to the recommendations of an energy-policy task force headed by Vice President Dick Cheney. Administration officials have made clear that the task force likely will recommend increasing the nation's nuclear-energy capability. Piketon proponents, such as Rep. Ted Strickland, D-Lucasville, say that should make keeping southern Ohio's enrichment plant on standby a no- brainer. The country's other enrichment plant, also run by USEC in Paducah, Ky., hasn't proved capable of producing a reliable supply of commercial- grade enriched uranium, Strickland and others claim. USEC says an upgrade of the Paducah plant is going well, but Strickland says it would be folly in these energy- security conscious times to rely on Paducah for America's sole supply of domestic enriched uranium. Piketon also would be the perfect place to locate an advanced-technology program, argue Strickland, Ohio GOP Sens. Mike DeWine and George V. Voinovich, and others. The argument makes sense. But don't blame southern Ohioans with Piketon plant ties if they don't count on sense winning out. They're too used to being yanked around. jriskind@dispatch.com Copyright © 2001, The Columbus Dispatch ***************************************************************** 19 Radon warnings being ignored by county residents JS Online: Health officials push tests for cancer-causing gas By DON BEHM of the Journal Sentinel staff *Last Updated: April 21, 2001* An increasing number of county health departments say they are not reaching enough of the public with the message that they should be testing their homes for radon. After more than 11 years of distributing information about the risk of lung cancer posed by exposure to radon where people live, only 15% to 20% of homes in Wisconsin have been tested for the odorless gas. But nearly one-tenth of tested homes - about 100,000 - have main-floor radon levels that exceed federal exposure guidelines, according to researchers at the state Division of Public Health. In recent years, excessive levels were found in more than 20% of homes tested in large areas of Waukesha, Washington, Racine, Walworth and Dodge counties. A summary of tests also shows high levels in 10% to 20% of homes tested in portions of Milwaukee and Kenosha counties. High levels also were found in 1% to 10% of tests in the southern two-thirds of Ozaukee County. Radon is emitted in the natural decay of radioactive materials in rock and soil. The gas can flow into homes through cracks or other openings in foundations. Excessive radon levels are found in homes in each county of the state, but the prevalence varies widely, even in areas with similar bedrock and soil, said Conrad Weiffenbach, a nuclear engineer with the state Division of Public Health in Madison. Consequently, state and local health officials recommend universal testing as the only way to check the presence of radon in a home. Ozaukee County's Public Health Department has been encouraging people to test their homes, said Glenda Madlom, the department Director. The department is selling a testing device to county residents for $3. In Ozaukee, the southern two-thirds of the county has soil conditions more likely to produce high radon levels compared with the northern part of the county. But even if you're neighbor tested for radon and came back with a negative result, it's still a good idea to test. "The level of radon can vary from house to house on the same street," said Margaret Anderson, an environmental health specialist with the Washington County Health Department. "Everybody should test because there is no way to predict what the levels of radon would be in a home." After making her pitch over the years at county fairs, public health fairs and other community events in Ozaukee and Washington counties, Anderson decided last month to spend a few hundred dollars of a federal radon education grant on advertisements in four small circulation newspapers in the two counties. It was a first for her. "I have had a hard time reaching people with this radon message," Anderson said. "So, I thought I'd put in this ad with a coupon because coupons catch people's eyes," she said. It did just that. More than 50 families responded within 10 days of the first notice. Even a casual reader could not miss the coupon-style ad's bold headline: "Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States." Then Anderson offered readers a deal - half-price off the regular $6 cost of a radon test kit if they brought in or mailed the coupon to her office. "We need to get more of these kits out to people," she said. The health risks The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the surgeon general have recommended taking steps to reduce radon accumulation in a home if there are 4 or more picocuries of the gas per liter of air in the lowest living area, usually the first floor of a home. A picocurie is a measure of radioactivity - the pace at which radioactive elements, such as uranium and radium, disintegrate. The odds of someone developing lung cancer after breathing household air containing that much radon for several decades is about 0.2%, or 2 in 1,000, for people who never smoke, according to the EPA. The National Academy of Sciences reviewed medical studies and determined that the odds might be even greater, up to 0.7%, or 7 in 1,000, for people who spend 75% of their time in the home. An academy study released in 1999 estimated that 15,000 U.S. residents die each year from lung cancer due to radon exposure. About 2,000 to 3,000 of them never smoked. Radon harms only the lungs and not other tissues. Radon atoms in the air spontaneously decay to other radioactive elements that attach to dust. If inhaled into the lung, those elements continue to decay by emitting a type of radiation capable of damaging cells in the lung. Though tobacco smoke is the predominant cause of lung cancer, radon control is a way for former smokers and never-smokers to reduce their lung cancer risks, according to Conrad Weiffenbach, a nuclear engineer with the state Division of Public Health in Madison. How to test Only a test reveals how much radon is present in living areas, Weiffenbach said. Special test kits generally cost about $10 at local hardware stores, home improvement centers or county health departments. "It is important to do the tests when the windows are closed," said Dan Ziegler, an environmental health specialist in Ozaukee County's Department of Public Health. "Also, people should do the test in the part of the house where they spend most of their time." A homeowner simply places the detector in a recommended location, waits four to seven days, then seals the detector in a package provided with the kit and mails it to a laboratory for analysis. This initial test should be done when windows are closed. If this short-term test finds less than 4 picocuries of radon per liter of air, then no other steps are necessary. If the test results are between 4 and 10 picocuries, then a longer test of between 90 days and a full year is recommended with a different type of detector, according to Tellier. Cost of this test kit is about $15. "Most homes where a short-term test finds elevated levels, they are slightly elevated, so the homeowner would benefit from the long-term test," Tellier said. "And the annual test likely would show that radon is not a problem." "Then you get a definite answer, an average of all seasons and all kinds of weather," he said. "And if you're not involved in the sale of a home, then you have time to do a second, long-term test." Short-term results of more than 10 picocuries should be checked with a second, short-term test. If the results are similar, then corrective steps should be taken as soon as possible, Tellier said. "Because the levels are so high, a homeowner shouldn't test for a full year," he said. "If the second short-term test verifies the result, you should be fixing the home to reduce exposure." *Journal Sentinel reporter Jeff Cole contributed to this report.* Appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on April 22, 2001. ***************************************************************** 20 Caboolture residents oppose proposed nuclear plant ABC News - 22 Apr 2001 14:10 AEST Caboolture residents, north of Brisbane, fear they may soon be living next to a highly radioactive nuclear plant. Community Action Group secretary Frank Jell says an irradiation plant, proposed for the Narangba industrial estate, will be energized by Cobalt 60, which is normally stored as radioactive waste. Mr Jell says more than 700 residents voiced their opposition to the development of the plant on Friday night after processing company Steritech advertised their intentions to use Cobalt 60. He says if the plant succeeds in obtaining a licence the health of the general public is in jeopardy. "One Cobalt pencil has the capacity to spread radioactive contamination over an area of 6,000 square kilometres," he said. "That means that we have quite a dangerous facility sitting in the midst of an otherwise rural residential area." The company behind the proposed irradiation plant has dismissed claims it is keeping residents in the dark about how the plant will be fuelled. Local community activists say they have now been told Cobalt 60 will be used as a power source not gamma radiation. But George West from Steritech says Cobalt 60 was always going to be used and gamma rays are emitted by the product. He says there should be no confusion. © 1999 Australian Broadcasting Corporation ***************************************************************** 21 Nuclear fuel arrives at Temelin - April 22, 2001 CNN.com - The Temelin plant has caused friction between the Czech Republic and Austria TEMELIN, Czech Republic -- A train carrying nuclear fuel has arrived under tight security at the controversial Temelin nuclear power plant in the southern Czech Republic. The fuel arrived on Sunday making the long journey from the northern Polish seaport of Szczecin, plant director Frantisek Hezoucky said. A train carrying nuclear waste from Germany to France sparked huge protests earlier in the month but there were no incidents reported at the Temelin plant. But the controversial $2.6 billion plant, built just over 50 km (31 miles) from the borders of neighbouring Austria, has had a rocky start. It suffered several shutdowns during testing because of vibrations and a crack in steam piping in Temelin's turbine in the non-nuclear, power-generating part of the station. Austrian protesters have staged border blockades demanding its closure, and a series of minor failures have forced repeated shutdowns since it was first launched last October. Austria says the station, which combines a Russian VVER-1,000 reactor with a U.S.-made control system by Westinghouse, may be unsafe. Its operator, the government-controlled power company CEZ, insists it is a state-of-the-art project. A recent Czech-led independent commission, which included observers from the EU, Austria and Germany, gave Temelin high marks in an environmental impact study. But Austria has in the past threatened to block Prague's bid to join the European Union unless its demands for full safety inspections are met. ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARTICLES ***************************************************************** 1 French 'weapons grade' exports to Iraq blocked THE SUNDAY TIMES: WORLD NEWS April 22 2001 EUROPE Stephen Grey, Brussels *Saddam: shopping list BRITAIN and America have accused France of mounting a billion-pound export drive to Iraq that they fear could help Saddam Hussein build weapons of mass destruction. A confidential list of 6,000 contracts signed by Baghdad, obtained by The Sunday Times, reveals that French companies have agreed to supply Iraq with chemicals, refrigerated trucks and sophisticated pumps that British security sources believe could be used to make chemical weapons. The planned exports - which under United Nations sanctions must be approved by the security council - also in-clude fast computers and high-speed communications equipment that could be employed in making missiles. British and American diplomats are blocking 117 French contracts worth £200m containing components thought to be of potential use in making missiles or chemical, nuclear or biological weapons. They are among 965 contracts being challenged from the 18-month period to February 2001. All but one challenge has been instigated by officials in London or Washington. The exports are permitted under the "oil for food" programme set up in 1996 to allow Iraq to buy humanitarian aid from the proceeds of oil sales. British security sources claim to have uncovered evidence that exports described as part of farming or school programmes were instead destined for the Iraqi military. In February Britain blocked one such £200,000 contract claiming it contained high-technology valves that were "an essential component of ballistic missiles". The name and nationality of the exporting company were not clear. Francis Maude, the shadow foreign secretary, accused Paris last week of ignoring the dangers of Iraqi rearmament. "The French are engaged in a massive export programme de-signed to enhance their economic power," he said. "But this should not be a signal for us to abandon these controls." Of the £10 billion of contracts under consideration, the largest shares are accounted for by Egyptian companies (worth £1 billion) and by Russian firms (£975m). French exports, worth £972m, are viewed with the greatest concern, because many involve high technology. The list shows £12m of contracts are with British companies as against £8m for American firms. According to the list, obtained in conjunction with Gulf States Newsletter, the contentious contracts include a £30,000 deal by Rohm &Haas France to supply Iraq with water treatment chemicals. It has been blocked as "dual use" - with military as well as civilian applications. The company says the chemicals are harmless. Contracts involving other French companies that have been frozen include a £900,000 deal to supply chemicals for insecticide and a £4.6m deal for a sprinkler irrigation system. Also affected are contracts worth £1m signed by Ensival, a Belgian pump manufacturer; they include one worth £20,000 that Britain claims could "provide Iraq with the ability to produce items of chemical weapons and of nuclear concern". Ensival refused to comment last week, saying that "sensitive negotiations" were under way to have the suspensions lifted. America is blocking a contract for "educational materials and equipment" from Elettronica Veneta in Italy on the grounds that it includes pressure controls and transducers that have "nuclear weapons applications". Another £1.4m contract for transport equipment involving Energomachexport, a Russian firm, has been frozen because it contains detonators with "nuclear and missile potential". The company said there was "nothing nuclear or illegal in any way among our machines". The dispute over exports coincides with a wider debate over whether sanctions on Iraq, imposed after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait, are still justified. "With infant mortality doubled in Iraq, these blockages have caused real suffering," said one French foreign ministry source. Proceeds from authorised oil sales are paid into a UN account at a bank in Paris; 72% of the money is used to pay for imports and 25% goes towards compensating the victims of the invasion of Kuwait. Copyright 2001 Times Newspapers Ltd. This service is provided on Times ***************************************************************** 2 Russia overhauling its icebreaker fleet BBC News | EUROPE | 22 April, 2001, Russia is to overhaul its fleet of arctic icebreakers, and is planning the construction of a new generation of the massive nuclear powered vessels. The Russian transport ministry has announced that the nuclear reactors on seven of the ships will be upgraded, and it hopes to commission the first of the new icebreakers by 2010 at a cost of half-a-billion dollars. The vessels are used to keep open the shipping lanes off the northern coast for the cargo ships that bring metal ore and other natural resources from Siberia to western Russia where it is processed and exported. Russia has also advocated the clearing of routes along the Northeast Passage for ships travelling between Europe and Asia to tap into the lucrative trade that now sails through the Suez Canal or around Africa. *From the newsroom of the BBC World Service* ***************************************************************** 3 Report: Israel Arrests Scientist April 22, 2001 LONDON (AP) - A retired Israeli military scientist who was believed to be involved the country's nuclear program has been arrested in Israel after his relationship with a Russian woman raised suspicions, the Sunday Times newspaper of London reported. Yitzhak Yaakov, 75, was arrested by a security branch of Israel's Defense Ministry on March 28 and has been questioned about his relationship with the unidentified Russian woman, the British newspaper reported. Yaakov, who holds both Israeli and U.S. citizenship, retired almost 25 years ago from the Israeli army. He served in the military as a brigadier general and chief of research and development, the newspaper said. Israeli police and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon refused to comment Sunday on the report. The Times said Yaakov's friends in the United States, where he worked until last year as chairman of the New York-based company Constellation 3D Inc., expressed surprise at the news of his arrest. The computer hardware company develops advanced optical data storage products, and has branches in Israel and Russia. Yaakov was believed to have been involved in Israel's nuclear program during his time in the military, and when he worked as the chief scientist at the Ministry of Industry, The Times said. The U.S. State Department in Washington told the newspaper that Yaakov should be entitled to consular assistance. The U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv told The Associated Press it could not comment on the case. Israel has a nuclear reactor in Dimona, in the Negev Desert in the south of the country, and is widely assumed to have nuclear weapons. But the country has always refused to comment on its nuclear capabilities. Mordechai Vanunu, a technician who worked at Israel's nuclear reactor at Dimona, is serving 18 years in prison for giving pictures taken inside the reactor to The Sunday Times in 1986. Based on the photographs, nuclear experts said Israel had the world's sixth-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons. The CIA has estimated more recently that Israel has between 200 and 400 nuclear weapons. All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 4 ENERGY DEPARTMENT BUDGET: Nevada spending may rise [Las Vegas Review-Journal] Saturday, April 21, 2001 Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal Yucca Mountain could get half of $747.2 million By STEVE TETREAULT DONREY WASHINGTON BUREAU WASHINGTON -- The Energy Department is proposing a 13 percent spending increase for its Nevada operations next year, boosting its budget for nuclear weapons programs and waste disposal but cutting alternative energy research. Budget figures show at least $747.2 million would be spent, mostly through the Nevada Operations Office, which manages programs at the Nevada Test Site, and for continued studies of a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. Energy officials said their numbers for Nevada are close but not exact, since some small additional amounts for the state may be tucked in other budget line items. Almost half the Energy Department budget for the state, $365 million, involves work at Yucca Mountain, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Coupled with segments of the nuclear waste program being managed elsewhere, the government is seeking a 14 percent increase for the Yucca Mountain program. Spending to manage and test the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, the main work focus at the Nevada Test Site, would grow by 15 percent, to $271.2 million. "It allows Nevada to maintain its levels of employment and allows us to continue ongoing programs, but does not provide for new initiatives," said Darwin Morgan, a department spokesman. The additional funding would boost Test Site capabilities to conduct subcritical experiments, designed to test weapons short of causing a nuclear chain reaction. The government plans to construct a concrete building to house the Atlas pulsed power machine that is being moved from Los Alamos, N.M. The Atlas, a circular, 80-foot diameter machine, will fire bursts of electron materials to simulate temperatures reached by nuclear weapons explosions. The budget also assumes another device used in subcriticals, the JASPER gas gun, will be nuclear-material operational during the year, Morgan said. Morgan said engineers also will complete a new shaft reaching 960 feet below the surface to the main laboratories where subcritical tests are conducted. The shaft will enable more scientists to be ferried to the underground facility. Five subcritical experiments were conducted at the Test Site in 2000 by teams from the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Morgan said it is unknown yet how many may be conducted in the coming year. Troy Wade, a retired Energy Department assistant secretary who now heads the Nevada Alliance trade group of Test Site contractors, said a 15 percent increase in weapons spending in Nevada "is a good-sized chunk." "What's intriguing is this reflects something that is terribly important, which is a move towards more basic science at the Test Site," he said. Morgan said the work force for Energy Department activities in Southern Nevada is about 5,975, with 377 being federal workers and the remainder employed by contractors. While weapons programs will increase, spending on nuclear nonproliferation programs would be cut by 40 percent in Nevada, dropping from $6.7 million to $4 million. These include projects that help detect the spread of weapons by monitoring nuclear explosions, and programs that provide technical assistance to nuclear plant operators in the former Soviet Union. The department said spending nationwide on nonproliferation initiatives is being slowed to accommodate a review of Russian programs. Nevada research into developing hydrogen as a fuel also would be cut, by two-thirds from $2.5 million to about $800,000. Nationally, hydrogen research spending would be cut 48 percent, and research on other forms of alternative energy would be cut more than a third. The department's contribution to the NTS Development Corp., a nonprofit which seeks to lure private business to the Test Site, would be increased from $500,000 to $2 million, a spokesman said. About $3 million is allocated to the Western Area Power Administration, which markets electricity generated at Hoover Dam. This story is located at: http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Apr-21-Sat-2001/news/15924906.html ***************************************************************** 5 Committed - Chao reassures nuclear workers The Paducah Sun Paducah, Kentucky Sunday, April 22, 2001 Labor Secretary Elaine Chao told ailing nuclear workers what they needed to hear last week when she declared that she was personally committed to seeing that they are compensated for job-related illnesses. Chao sparked controversy when she proposed transferring the program from the Department of Labor to the Justice Department or another federal agency. Last year Congress and the Clinton administration agreed that the Labor Department should handle claims from the program, which covers workers, former workers and their surviving families at federal nuclear facilities, including the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant. A fear was that the bureaucratic infighting in the Bush administration signaled indifference to the compensation program and perhaps even a desire by budget officials to weaken it. Chao now says the Labor Department will administer the program. But, more important, she expresses strong support for the principle of fairness underlying it. "From the beginning, my only concern was for the workers," Chao told reporters. "They have been wronged by their government in their service to the country, and they deserve to be taken care of." The workers have been wronged by the government. That is exactly the point. Two years ago former Energy Secretary Bill Richardson acknowledged the federal government's responsibility for exposing workers in nuclear weapons plants to radioactive materials and hazardous chemicals without their knowledge. Since then U.S. Sens. Mitch McConnell and Jim Bunning and First District Congressman Ed Whitfield have worked diligently to ensure the federal government makes good its promise to compensate workers for any harm they may have suffered as a result of exposure to dangerous substances. These officials and the leaders of the atomic workers' union pushed for the Labor Department to handle workers' claims because of the experience the agency has in administering other large compensation programs. At bottom, it doesn't matter which agency oversees the program as long as workers receive the consideration they deserve. However, the appearance is that the Labor Department, with its large staff and regional offices, is in a better position to process claims promptly than other agencies, especially the Justice Department, which does not have a good record of dispensing benefits in a small program for uranium miners the agency administers. Secretary Chao says her biggest concern was that the Labor Department would not be ready by the July 31 congressional deadline to accept applications for benefits. But she does acknowledge that prolonged controversy over the program would certainly not be good for the workers. It also needs saying that the Bush administration could face political consequences in Kentucky, Ohio and other states with nuclear facilities if the perception developed that it was not enthusiastic about helping ailing workers. Chao's strong statement of support for the compensation program should reassure plant workers that the administration is prepared to carry out the commitments made by Congress. Chao also showed her interest in the workers' views by taking the time to call David Fuller, the president of the union local that represents employees at Paducah's uranium enrichment plant, to inform him that the Labor Department would oversee the program. The labor secretary made a favorable impression on the program's supporters, although she indicated her agency won't be able to accept claims by July 31. A small delay shouldn't cause significant problems, but skeptical people here in Paducah will be waiting to see if Chao backs up her statements of support with action that gets the program up and running by early next year. Our sense is that she will prove to be an energetic supporter of the workers' right to fair compensation. ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************