***************************************************************** 07/10/01 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 9.169 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR POWER CONTENTS 1 NRC to Meet with TVA Nuclear Officials to Discuss Safety 2 NRC to Meet with Southern Nuclear Officials to Discuss Safety 3 NRC to Meet with SCE&G Officials to Discuss Safety Performance at 4 NRC to Meet With Nuclear Management Company to Discuss Safety 5 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, 6 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, 7 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, 8 NRC Proposes Amending Skin Dose Limit For Workers at Nuclear 9 NRC Schedules Public Workshop on Possible New Reactor 10 Solid waste found on water system land • However, officials say 11 Britain Nuclear Accident Probed 12 EPA Seeks Comments on Clean Air Act 13 N-fuel process, cleanup stir activists 14 Parkway study being considered 15 Nuclear Waste Plan Shelved 16 Nuclear waste storage opposed 17 Bill focuses on nuclear waste fund 18 Whither Plutonium? 19 What to spend, how to spend it 20 Bill aims to ease Yucca funding barriers 21 High Noon in the West 22 Potential Nuclear Nightmare 23 Not In Our Backyard 24 Injury ends SA protester's antinuclear walk 25 Letters from SSAB to oppose cleanup cuts 26 Anniston native is one of nation's top nuclear men 27 ADAMS: Items of Interest - Monday, July 09, 2001 28 Your Views: Plant names linked to product - 29 ADAMS: Items of Interest - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 30 Utah House Members Vote Against Transportation Study 31 Envirocare puts plan for hot waste on ice 32 BNFL investigates fuel rods accident 33 Safety inspectors called in to investigate fuel rods accident at NUCLEAR WEAPONS CONTENTS 1 Senate Debates Defense Spending 2 ROBERT KENNEDY JR. JAILED FOR VIEQUES PROTEST 3 Fallon jet-fuel line is checked for leaks 4 ORNL's military research role could be on the rise 5 Activists, residents tour weapons facility 6 New Zealand DNA testing on servicement 7 Health package available for radiation sicknesses 8 Bush moves to stymie firearm cuts - 9 Road across Rocky Flats studied 10 Nuclear veterans to be DNA tested ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR POWER ARTICLES ***************************************************************** 1 NRC to Meet with TVA Nuclear Officials to Discuss Safety Performance at Watts Bar Nuclear Power Plant Press Release Region II - 2001 - 29 - UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. II-01-029 July 9, 2001 CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority officials on Tuesday, July 17, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the Watts Bar nuclear power plant. The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) in Classroom 19 of the Watts Bar Training Center at the plant site near Spring City, Tennessee. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to the public. A letter sent from NRC Region II to TVA, which addresses plant safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WB1/wb1_chart.html. ***************************************************************** 2 NRC to Meet with Southern Nuclear Officials to Discuss Safety Performance at Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant Press Release Region II - 2001 - 30 - UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. II-01-030 July 9, 2001 CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating Company officials on Tuesday, July 17, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the Vogtle nuclear power plant. The meeting will be held at 3:00 p.m. in the Administration Building Auditorium at the plant site near Waynesboro, Georgia. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to the public. A letter sent from NRC Region II to Southern Nuclear, which addresses plant safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG1/vog1_chart.htmland www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG2/vog2_chart.html. ***************************************************************** 3 NRC to Meet with SCE&G Officials to Discuss Safety Performance at Summer Nuclear Power Plant Press Release Region II - 2001 - 31 - UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30303 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. II-01-031 July 9, 2001 CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with South Carolina Electric & Gas officials on Tuesday, July 17, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the Summer nuclear power plant. The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the 2nd Floor Cafeteria of the Nuclear Operations Building at the plant site near Jenkinsville, South Carolina. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to the public. A letter sent from NRC Region II to SCE&G, which addresses plant safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUM/sum_chart.html. ***************************************************************** 4 NRC to Meet With Nuclear Management Company to Discuss Safety Region III -- 2001 - 038 -- UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532 No. III-01-038 July 10, 2001 CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Nuclear Management Company officials July 16 to discuss the NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota. The meeting will begin at 6 p.m. CDT and will be held at the Monticello Community Center, 505 Walnut Street, in Monticello. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety performance at the Monticello plant from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs plant officials of the NRC's plans for future inspections at the facility. The Monticello assessment letter and inspection are available at or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance information for the plant is available at ***************************************************************** 5 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, Maryland, on July 17 -19 Press Release 2001 - 081 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. 01-081 July 6, 2001 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will meet on July 17-19 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other things, proposed reports by the NRC staff and the Department of Energy on radioactive waste issues. The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency's Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m. each day. A complete agenda is attached. For additional information or agenda changes, contact Howard Larson at 301-415-6805. ACNW meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/. ACNW Full Agenda Tuesday, July 17 8:30 - 8:40 A.M.: Opening Statement (Open) - The Chairman will open the meeting with brief remarks, outline the topics to be discussed, and indicate several items of interest. 8:40 - 10:15 A.M.: ACNW Planning and Procedures (Open) - The Committee will review items under consideration at this meeting and consider topics proposed for future ACNW meetings. 10:30 - 12:00 Noon: Update on Igneous Activity Issue Resolution (Open) - The Committee members will receive a presentation from the NRC staff on progress in resolving the igneous activity issue. 1:00 - 3:00 P.M.: DOE's Supplemental Science and Performance Analysis (SSPA) (Open - Tentative) - The Committee members will receive a status report from DOE on its SSPA to be issued this summer. 3:15 - 4:15 P.M.: Research Plan for Radionuclide Transport Program (Open) - The Committee members will receive an information briefing by the NRC RES staff on the current status of the radionuclide transport program, and will discuss its plans to review the research program. 4:15 - 4:45 P.M.: Meeting Reports (Open) - The Committee will hear reports from the members and staff on meetings attended since the 127th ACNW meeting. 4:45 - 6:00 P.M.: Preparation of ACNW Reports (Open) - The Committee will discuss the following proposed reports: Igneous Activity Issue Resolution and Research Plan for Radionuclide Transport. Wednesday, July 18 8:30 - 8:40 A.M.: Opening Remarks by the ACNW Chairman (Open) - The ACNW Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of the meeting. 8:40 - 12:00 Noon.: Key Technical Issues (KTIs) - Vertical Slice Report (Open) - The Committee members will discuss their progress and then commence drafting a report on assigned KTIs. 1:00 - 2:30 P.M.: Greater-than-Class C (GTCC) Wastes (Open) - The Committee will hear a presentation by DOE representatives on their handling of certain types of GTCC. 2:45 - 7:00 P.M.: Preparation of ACNW Reports (Open) - The Committee will discuss proposed reports on the following topics: Igneous Activity Issues Resolution; Research Plan for Radionuclide Transport; GTCC Disposal Options; and KTI-Vertical Slice Report. Thursday, July 19 8:30 - 8:35 A.M.: Opening Remarks by the ACNW Chairman (Open) - The ACNW Chairman will make opening remarks regarding the conduct of the meeting. 8:35 - 9:30 A.M.: Preparations for October Visit to Nevada (Open) - The Committee will discuss potential topics, including public outreach sessions and a visit to the Envirocare facility. 9:30 - 12:45 P.M..: Discussion of Proposed ACNW Reports (Open) - The Committee will continue its discussion of proposed ACNW reports. 12:45 - 1:00 P.M.: Miscellaneous (Open) - The Committee will discuss matters related to the conduct of Committee activities and matters and specific issues that were not completed during previous meetings, as time and availability of information permit. ***************************************************************** 6 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, Maryland, on July 17 -19 Press Release 2001 - 081 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: Web Site: No. 01-082 July 6, 2001 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is beginning a one-year pilot of the Safeguards Performance Assessment (SPA) program, a process by which a power-reactor licensee tests the effectiveness of key elements of its physical security program. The pilot program will also allow NRC to evaluate concepts being considered for proposed revisions to NRC regulations. It will also be used to determine if the SPA has merit as a possible replacement for the Operational Safeguards Response Evaluation (OSRE), the current NRC program to assess physical security at nuclear power plants. The SPA program provides for: + development of "target sets," equipment essential for safe operations of a reactor, as the basis for a licensee's physical security measures; + participation by each security shift in a minimum of one annual licensee-evaluated drill to demonstrate proficiency for key security personnel; + quarterly drills; and + participation in an NRC-evaluated exercise every 3 years to test the licensee's ability to protect target sets from mock acts of sabotage. On a case-by-case basis, licensees who volunteer to participate in the SPA pilot may be exempt from an OSRE. However, NRC baseline inspections under the reactor oversight program will continue to assess licensees' ability to protect themselves from malevolent acts. NRC will continue to conduct OSREs at sites not participating in the SPA pilot program until its evaluation of SPA is completed and the Commission determines whether it is an acceptable alternative to OSRE. Under the SPA program, full-scale force-on-force exercises would be conducted at each nuclear power plant every three years, exceeding the frequency of the OSRE program, which provides for an NRC assessment of each plant's security programs every eight years. Like OSRE, the SPA program includes provisions to address deficiencies identified through drills and exercises within the licensee's corrective action program. NRC will choose eight volunteers from those plants that have agreed to participate in the pilot program. This evaluation is part of an ongoing effort by NRC to identify more efficient and effective ways to assess security at nuclear power plants. ***************************************************************** 7 NRC Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste To Meet in Rockville, Maryland, on July 17 -19 Press Release 2001 - 081 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. 01-083 July 6, 2001 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company to increase the generating capacity of the two San Onofre nuclear power plants by 1.4 percent, or about 16 megawatts of electricity per unit. The power uprate at the nuclear facility, located near San Clemente, will increase the generating capacity of each unit to about 1,090 megawatts of electricity. The facility intends to implement the power increase while online in early July. The application for the increase in power was submitted to the NRC in April. The three-month review period by the agency reflects efforts to improve the timeliness of the review process for this type of request. The NRC's safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the units focused on several areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and technical specification changes. ***************************************************************** 8 NRC Proposes Amending Skin Dose Limit For Workers at Nuclear Facilities Press Release 2001 - 084 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. 01-084 July 9, 2001 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its standards for protection against radiation. The proposed changes would revise the method for determining the amount of radiation to the skin that workers receive when conducting licensed activities. The proposed rule, which would revise Part 20 of the Commission's regulations, is based on recent recommendations from the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP Report No. 130 and Statement No. 9) and responds to the need to establish more risk-informed limits for dose from radioactive particles, sometimes known as "hot particles," and doses to very small areas of the skin. This approach is also consistent with the regulations of the Department of Energy. Under the proposal, the dose to the skin would be averaged over the most highly exposed 10 square centimeters instead of being averaged over one square centimeter. This change is based on scientific studies that demonstrate that risks from doses to small areas of the skin are less than risks to larger areas from the same dose. Current rules require frequent monitoring of workers to detect hot particles and small area exposures that have insignificant health implications. These conservative efforts to prevent small, insignificant skin doses result in higher whole-body doses with a higher risk than the avoided skin doses. The health effects from small-area skin doses, such as reddening of the skin, that might occur from a hot particle exposure are considered by the NCRP to be very small as compared to the increased whole-body deep doses from monitoring and work inefficiencies. To avoid exceeding the current dose limit, protective clothing and cumbersome gloves may be used that result in workers being subjected to non-radiological hazards, such as heat stress and other injury consequences. Workers are also hampered by the excessive use of protective equipment and clothing, requiring them to spend more time completing a job in radiation areas. Additionally, small-area overexposures can result in licensee citations and the possibility that a worker might not be permitted to work in a radiation area for the balance of the year. The rulemaking is designed to establish a uniform, risk-informed skin dose limit for all sources of shallow radiation exposures, including hot particles and small area skin contaminations. The rule would also lessen physical stress and reduce whole-body doses to workers by reducing the frequency of monitoring for hot particles. The net result is a substantial increase in worker safety and a cost-effective reduction in unnecessary regulatory burden with little to no impact on worker safety. Interested persons are invited to submit comments within 75 days after publication of a Federal Register notice on this subject, expected shortly. Comments may be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. They can be delivered to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. Comments may also be submitted via the NRC's interactive rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov. ***************************************************************** 9 NRC Schedules Public Workshop on Possible New Reactor Applications Press Release 2001 - 085 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. 01-085 July 9, 2001 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will convene a public workshop on July 25 and 26 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss possible future license applications for commercial nuclear power plants and solicit public feedback on issues and concerns. The workshop, which is open to the public, will be held in the NRC's auditorium at the agency's Two White Flint North building, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Sessions are scheduled from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on July 25, and 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on July 26. The purpose of the workshop is to inform the public of current and proposed activities by the NRC staff to prepare for possible future license applications, discuss opportunities available for public participation during these licensing activities, and obtain public feedback on identified licensing issues. Topics to be discussed include certification of nuclear power plant designs; the combined license application process which authorizes construction of a nuclear plant and specifies inspections, tests and analyses that a licensee must perform before it can operate; construction inspection; reactivation of construction permits for unfinished nuclear power plants; pre-application reviews which encourage early interaction between applicants and vendors and the NRC; agency rulemaking activities; and NRC activities, organizational development and staffing. The workshop will have two open sessions to allow participants to discuss licensing issues of concern not specifically addressed by agenda items. The first of these sessions will be held on the evening of July 25, to allow participation by individuals who cannot attend during the work day and will include a brief presentation by the NRC staff summarizing all of the day's agenda items. A second open session will begin shortly before noon on July 26. Those seeking additional information or wishing to pre-register for the workshop should contact Eric Benner, at 1-800-368-5642, ext. 1171, or by e-mail at ejb@nrc.govby July 20. A preliminary agenda is attached. A final agenda will be available on a special web site to provide information to the public on activities in preparation for possible new nuclear power plants. Background information, news releases, public meeting notices and summaries, reference documents and inspection reports regarding possible future reactor license applications have been posted at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/FLO/index.htmon the agency's web site. Other pertinent documents will be added as they are completed and become available to the public. ### Future Licensing Workshop Schedule Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:00 - 9:15 a.m. Statement of workshop protocol (F. Cameron) 9:15 - 9:30 a.m. Introduction, including a discussion of purpose for the workshop, background information, and workshop organization (M. Gamberoni) 9:30 - 10:00 a.m. Keynote speaker William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations Nuclear Regulatory Commission 10:00 - 10:15 a.m. Introduction of agenda topics (M. Gamberoni) 10:15 - 11:15 a.m. 10 CFR Part 52 overview and combined licenses (J. Wilson) 11:15 - 11:30 a.m. Break 11:30 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Early site permits (T. Kenyon) 12:15- 1:00 p.m. Design Certification (J. Wilson) 1:00 - 2:30 p.m. Lunch break 3:15 - 4:15 p.m. Rulemakings (E. Benner) + Update to 10 CFR Part 52 + Alternative Site Reviews + 10 CFR Part 51, Tables S3 and S4 2:30 - 3:15 p.m. Construction inspection and reactivation of construction permits (J. Sebrosky) 4:15 - 5:30 p.m. Dinner Break Evening Session 5:30 - 6:00 p.m. Summarization of agenda topics (M. Gamberoni) 6:00 - 6:15 p.m. Presentation of current mechanisms for public participation (M. Landau) 6:15 - 8:00 p.m. Open Discussion (All) Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:00 - 9:10 a.m. Introduction (M. Gamberoni) 9:10 -9:30 a.m. Readiness Assessment, Organizational Development, and Staffing (N. Gilles) 9:30 - 10:30 a.m. Pre-application reviews (D. Jackson) + Westinghouse AP1000 + Exelon Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) + Westinghouse International Reactor Innovative and Secure (IRIS) + General Atomics Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) 10:30 - 11:30 a.m. Nuclear Waste and Transportation Issues (TBD) 11:30 - 11:45 a.m. Break 11:45 a.m. - 12:45 p.m. Open Discussion (All) 12:45. - 1:00 p.m. Statement of appreciation and follow up activities (TBD) 1:00 p.m. Adjourn ***************************************************************** 10 Solid waste found on water system land • However, officials say that none of the contaminants has gotten into the water supply. By JOHN CASTELLUCCI Journal Staff Writer PAWTUCKET _ Contaminated soil and a granite basin filled with 13,200 cubic yards of solid waste have been discovered on properties belonging to the Pawtucket water system, Water Supply Board officials disclosed Friday. Arsenic, antimony, copper, lead, beryllium and hydrocarbons have been found on the grounds of the water treatment plant, off Mill Street in Cumberland. The basin filled with solid waste was found underneath the parking lot of Water Supply Board facilities on Branch Street, where the water system's administrative, engineering and customer service offices and transmission and distribution functions are housed. In neither place have the hazardous materials contaminated the water system, not even at the water treatment plant, the officials said. A site adjacent to the water system's sludge lagoons was found to contain low levels of arsenic and beryllium. The area west of Happy Hollow Pond, the last link in the chain of reservoirs that supply the system with drinking water, was found to contain arsenic, antimony, copper, hydrocarbons and lead. "None of those things show up in the water supply," said Allen Champagne, water production manager. Although arsenic, a poison, is easily removable through coagulation, "we don't have any detectable levels of it, either in the raw water or the finished water," Champagne said. The Branch and the Mill Street properties are being evaluated as the possible site of the Pawtucket water system's planned new water treatment plant, a $50 million-to-$60-million project the Water Supply Board hopes to have a private company design, build and operate. The contaminated soil and buried solid waste were discovered by consultants hired to prepare an environmental assessment of the Branch and Mill Street properties. The environmental assessment is being published as an addendum to the request for proposals for a new plant. Thomas F. Doucette, assistant chief engineer of the Water Supply Board, said the solid waste buried at Branch Street is sufficiently contained and poses no threat to the water system. Similarly, Doucette said, testing at the Mill Street site showed that none of the contaminants was soluble or able to travel through the soil. Nevertheless, Doucette said, the decision was made to disclose the existence of the contaminants and buried solid waste immediately. "Being a public water supply," he said, "we wanted to let people know." The soil contamination at Mill Street appears to have occurred before 1938, when the existing water treatment facility was built. Doucette said the beryllium appears to have been put there by a tool and die company that no longer exists. The arsenic appears to have been dumped by another industry that hasn't been identified but also no longer exists. On the Branch Street site, the buried solid waste was found, Doucette said, in a granite basin that was used to aerate and purify water before it went into the distribution system. The granite basin was removed from service when the existing water treatment plant was built. The waste, which consists of things like old tires and refrigerators, was dumped by the public works department in the 1960s, Doucette said. It was not clear on Friday how much it will cost to clean up the Branch and Mill Street sites. Doucette said the contamination and buried waste is so well contained it may be determined no cleanup is necessary. The Water Supply Board said there is enough room on both sites to allow for construction of the new water treatment plant on land that isn't contaminated. As a result, the findings are not expected to delay construction of the water treatment plant, which is needed to meet stringent new federal safe drinking water regulations due to take effect in 2004. Water Supply Board officials plan to sit down with officials of the Departments of Environmental Management and Health and determine what to do about the buried waste and soil contamination. DEM spokeswoman Gail Mastrati said Pamela M. Marchand, chief engineer of the Water Supply Board, recently wrote requesting a meeting to discuss the findings and the approach the board should take. 2001 The Providence Journal Company Privacy policy ***************************************************************** 11 Britain Nuclear Accident Probed July 08, 2001 LONDON- Spent fuel rods were accidentally dropped onto the reactor floor of a nuclear power plant in Scotland last week, its operator said Sunday. British Nuclear Fuels stressed that the "low-level" incident during refueling Thursday in Chapelcross plant's Reactor No. 3 posed minimal danger. The reactor has been shut down while the company determines how to retrieve the 24 uranium rods, a spokesman said. The government's watchdog agency, the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, has launched an investigation. The BNFL spokesman said the rods dropped about 2 feet to the floor during the remote-operated refueling operation. A large cylindrical basket holding the irradiated fuel elements appeared to come loose as it was being lowered to a cooling pond, he said. Emergency workers were called in and carbon dioxide was sprayed over the basket to ensure it did not catch fire. "At no time was there any increase in radiation within the area and no personnel were affected," he said. "There is also no indication that the fuel has been damaged." Refueling has been suspended at all reactors in Chapelcross, just a few miles from Scotland's border with England, and at another British plant that uses an identical system. The spokesman said it was unclear how long it would take to recover the rods and complete the refueling. All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 12 EPA Seeks Comments on Clean Air Act July 10, 2001 at 2:55:27 PDT CINCINNATI- Environmentalists and energy industry executives are getting a chance to tell the government how they think the Clean Air Act should be applied to power plants and oil refineries. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was scheduled to gather public comment at a hearing in Cincinnati on Tuesday, and in three other cities at later this month. At issue is the EPA's "new source review" program, which was incorporated into the Clean Air Act in 1977 to ensure that new sources of pollution, and the expansion of existing sources, do not hinder progress toward cleaning up the nation's air. The EPA is assessing whether the program could be changed to encourage more efficient use of energy resources while maintaining air quality. Energy industry officials complain the government is using the policy to hold existing plants to excessively tight standards when routine maintenance and replacement work is performed. That has increased costs and disrupted plant maintenance, in some cases curtailing power generation, the officials say. Environmentalists say the Bush administration and energy companies hope to water down enforcement of federal clean-air laws applied to power plants and oil refineries. If anything, the government should enforce those laws more vigorously, Sierra Club spokesman Glen Brand said Monday. The evaluation of the new source review program was ordered by an energy task force headed by Vice President Dick Cheney. In May, the task force proposed a plan to increase supplies of oil, gas and nuclear energy, and predicted the need for 1,300 new power plants. Hearings are planned for Thursday in Sacramento, Calif., July 17 in Boston and July 20 in Baton Rouge, La. The EPA is to report to the president by Aug. 17. On the Net: EPA site: http://www.epa.gov/air/nsr-review All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 13 N-fuel process, cleanup stir activists Buffalo News - WEST VALLEY N-fuel process, cleanup stir activists ROBERT KIRKHAM/Buffalo News Members of the Citizens Awareness Network - Cathy Cardell, left, and Nickole Remeta, both of Syracuse - wear "death masks" as they protest in front of a mock nuclear waste transport trailer at West Valley Demonstration Project. By KATHY KELLOGG Cattaraugus Correspondent 7/10/01 WEST VALLEY - Reprocessing irradiated fuel is too costly and creates more waste than can be effectively recycled to power the nation's nuclear reactors, according to activists who spoke out Monday. The activists were protesting a proposal that would resurrect the practice of reprocessing and another that would cut funding of cleanup efforts at sites such as West Valley. They met in a parking lot at the West Valley Demonstration Project, overlooking a former commercial reprocessing facility's waste-burial grounds. The site bustled with activities around structures used for the last 20 years to clean up waste created in atomic-energy production in the 1950s, '60s and '70s. The price tag for that effort has approached $1.5 billion and will grow once a final decision is made for closure of the state-owned site. Also in view were two rail cars loaded with specially engineered and cushioned casks containing 125 highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel assemblies awaiting shipment to the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory near Pocatello. The activists displayed a crude and rusty life-size version of these containers, bearing scrawled slogans: "Stop Mobile Chernobyl" and "This cask holds up to 40 times the lasting radiation of Hiroshima." The organizers said a 13-member coalition is behind the effort to haul the replica along a designated 2,300-mile rail route to Idaho in hopes of raising the awareness of nearby residents. Their action is a call for continued federal funding of cleanup efforts at West Valley and similar sites, along with an end to the generating of radioactive waste. In a statement, the group insisted on full cleanup of former reprocessing wastes before beginning discussions on future reprocessing and nuclear fuel production under the name suggested by the Bush administration energy plan, "pyro-processing." "We represent groups standing together to oppose the administration's plans to build more reactors. It has never been more obvious that reprocessing doesn't work and we have more waste to get rid of," said Carol Mongerson of the West Valley Coalition on Nuclear Wastes. David Pyles, a member of the Northeast Coalition on Nuclear Pollution and a former lab supervisor at the West Valley reprocessing facility for six years, said that his experiences proved the inefficiencies of reprocessing and contended that West Valley's workers received the highest exposures to radiation of any nuclear workers anywhere. "Of the 660 metric tons of reprocessed fuels, 600,000 gallons of high-level liquid radioactive waste were created, and 3,900 cubic meters of high-level solid waste," Pyles said. He also recalled that 42 ruptured fuel rods and 819 grams of plutonium were buried in drums on the site. Dug up later, the waste had leaked from the drums, he added. This summer's real-life transport will complete one step, postponed for various reasons in the 1980s and '90s, in the removal of what remains of the West Valley site's spent fuel stores, once numbering 750 fuel assemblies. While most were returned to their utility companies of origin by 1986, those awaiting shipment came from a facility in Michigan and from Ginna, an upstate New York reactor. They have been kept in a 35-year-old underwater storage pool that many believe is not fail-safe. The chosen railroad route will take the fuel rods on a four-day, 2,300-mile journey out of West Valley to Ashford Junction and Machias, then southward along Route 16 through Olean and Emporium, Pa. The route eventually turns westward, passing through Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska and Wyoming, and ending in Idaho. The activists said they think that the shipment is a test to prepare the way for future movements of larger quantities of nuclear waste materials now being stored at power plants in the Northeast. John Chamberlain, a public relations official at the West Valley Demonstration Project, where cleanup efforts have been under way since 1981, said the casks will be part of a seven-car train pulled this summer by a single Union Pacific locomotive. The date is being guarded for security reasons, not as part of any coverup, he said, adding that emergency responders in communities along the route will be informed and the train will be tracked by satellite at all times. "Technically, it's all loaded, and Idaho is ready to receive it," Chamberlain said. Tim Judson of the Citizens Awareness Network's Central New York Chapter in Syracuse, contended that people of color and Native Americans living in poor rural communities are being targeted to assume liability and risk for this and other wastes. He said that these people already are hosts to most of the Northeast's power plants and that their communities have been chosen as the transportation route to remove the waste. Copyright © 1999 - 2001 The Buffalo NewsTM ***************************************************************** 14 Parkway study being considered [www.TheDailyCamera.com] By Beth Wohlberg Camera Staff Writer The Colorado Department of Transportation's plan to study completion of the Northwest Parkway loop has some people concerned about the possibility of a roadway through Rocky Flats. Tom Norton of the transportation department discussed doing a comprehensive study of all possible routes — including one right through the former nuclear weapons site — at a Rocky Flats Coalition of Local Governments meeting on Monday. He said the state is looking for a regional corridor to finish the Northwest Parkway's final link between Broomfield and Golden. "We are looking at moving regional traffic," Norton said. "The existing development and zoning ... warrants additional transportation means. It's really playing catch-up." But Boulder County Commissioner Paul Danish and Boulder Mayor Will Toor said it's extremely unlikely a high-speed roadway on Rocky Flats property would gain enough political consensus to be built. Toor said a study of that alternative would be a waste of time and money. Doug Young, senior policy advisor for U.S. Rep. Mark Udall, D-Boulder, said the study also sets back the progress Udall and U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., have made on their wildlife refuge bill. If passed, the bill would turn Rocky Flats into a national wildlife refuge run by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service after cleanup is complete in 2006. Young said Norton's discussion makes it look as if some officials do not support the refuge bill because it doesn't include an option for a parkway across the site. But the bill is endorsed by the Rocky Flats Coalition, made up of members from Boulder County, Jefferson County and cities around Rocky Flats. "I am disappointed," Udall said. "This is just an unnecessary roadblock. In the end, I hope he will reconsider and work with existing corridor studies to meet the transportation demands in that part ... A wildlife refuge doesn't fit with a highway running through the middle of it. Those two uses are simply incompatible." Two other possibilities for closing the loop are widening Indiana Street east of Rocky Flats south to McIntyre Street and connecting with Interstate 70, or widening Indiana Street south to Leyden Road and connecting with Colo. 93. Jefferson County Commissioner Michelle Lawrence said studying all of the different alternatives makes sense — instead of simply drawing conclusions from studies that only addressed a few options. Several recently completed studies only looked at alternatives that go around the Rocky Flats site. "When you don't study all the issues, you don't bring the issue to finality," Lawrence said. "I would be surprised if every government entity didn't have their own preferred alternative. So I am comfortable with the idea of studying everything." Contact Beth Wohlberg at (303) 473-1364 or wohlbergb@thedailycamera.com. Copyright 2001 The Daily Camera. All rights reserved. Any ***************************************************************** 15 Nuclear Waste Plan Shelved The Salt Lake Tribune -- Tuesday, July 10, 2001 BY JIM WOOLF THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE Envirocare of Utah announced Monday it is delaying action on a plan to accept radioactive wastes that could be thousands of times "hotter" than those now accepted at its Tooele County disposal site. The decision appeared to have been influenced by recent private conversations between company officials and Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt. Natalie Gochnour, the governor's spokeswoman, disclosed Monday that Leavitt used the meetings to "express concerns" that granting approval for Envirocare to bring in additional radioactive waste could undermine his efforts to prevent the Skull Valley Band of the Goshute tribe from building a storage site for spent fuel from nuclear power plants across the nation. Blocking the Goshute project has been one of Leavitt's top priorities. "Word was on the street that the governor and the Legislature had no intention of approving it," Tooele County Commissioner Teryl Hunsaker said Monday. Loss of the project would be an economic blow to Tooele County, he said. Envirocare's decision to delay the project came moments after the Utah Division of Radiation Control decided the company's plan for handling and disposing of the waste meets all the technical requirements of state and federal law and issued a license for the facility. That left one large obstacle for Envirocare: persuading the Legislature and Leavitt to approve the project. But Envirocare President Charles Judd announced he wasn't going to take that final step, saying it would be "an extremely difficult task" to get final approval while the public is engaged in a heated debate over the unrelated Goshute proposal to store spent nuclear fuel rods on tribal land in western Utah. Although the wastes Envirocare wanted to accept -- mainly contaminated materials from power plants, labs and hospitals -- are far less radioactive than the spent fuel sought by the Goshutes, Judd said, opponents and competitors, "assisted by some members of the news media, have deliberately confused the people of Utah about the huge differences between the two proposals." Judd said the "public perception problem" has become so large that approval "is just not possible under this scenario." The project isn't dead, however. Judd said he intends to hold onto the five-year state license and see whether the political climate improves. "I'm not saying this will never happen," Judd said. "But it won't happen under the current scenario. I won't commit to what may happen in the next five years. The technical review is done and the license will stay in place. But it is not valid until we get approval from the governor and the Legislature." Bill Sinclair, director of the Utah Division of Radiation Control, said he was "shocked, stunned, surprised and flabbergasted" that Envirocare decided to temporarily shelve the project after his staff spent two years reviewing the application. He had seen no evidence that Envirocare was having doubts about proceeding. Opponents of Envirocare's proposal were pleased but cautious about Monday's decision to delay the project. "We should not become complacent about this issue," said Claire Geddes, spokeswoman for Utah Legislative Watch. "Now is the time we should start pushing the state for a comprehensive policy on nuclear waste coming into Utah, regardless of its level" of radioactivity. Jason Groenewold, spokesman for the Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah, said this could be nothing more than a political maneuver by Envirocare. "I wonder if this isn't just a smokescreen to try to convince the public this project isn't going to go through, and then they'll try to sneak it through at the last minute," he said. The state license issued to Envirocare still is subject to a 30-day appeal period. People who disagree with the state's technical approval can challenge the decision before the Utah Radiation Control Board and later the courts. © Copyright 2001, The Salt Lake Tribune All material found on ***************************************************************** 16 Nuclear waste storage opposed BBC News | WALES | Tuesday, 10 July, 2001, 05:45 GMT 06:45 UK [Trawsfynydd Power Station] Trawsfynydd was taken out of commission in 1993 Campaigners are calling for a public inquiry into plans to build a safe-store for nuclear waste at a plant in Snowdonia, north Wales The owner of the now closed Trawsfynydd site - British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL) has said it needs to contain waste which cannot be moved elsewhere for disposal. BNFL: problems have been addressed The company has said it would be capable of containing waste that has to stay on the site for more than 100 years. But the Council for National Parks has said there should be a public inquiry as the scheme is of national importance. This is the second time that BNFL has applied for permission to build a store for Intermediate Level Waste at the plant. In 1998 an application was called in by the then Welsh Secretary Ron Davies. The company wanted to store this particular type of nuclear waste in modified existing buildings at the site. Concerns But the plans were halted after nuclear inspectors voiced concerns about the detail of the proposals. BNFL has said that the new proposals address that problems which were raised by the inspectors. The company plans to build a store capable of holding the waste until radioactivity levels have fallen low enough to be handled without the need for sophisticated protection. That could be as long as 135 years. Local anti-nuclear campaigners are to meet soon to discuss the plan. Trawsfynydd was taken out of commission in 1993, with the last of the spent fuel being removed from the site two years later. ***************************************************************** 17 Bill focuses on nuclear waste fund [Las Vegas Review-Journal] Tuesday, July 10, 2001 Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal By STEVE TETREAULT DONREY WASHINGTON BUREAU WASHINGTON -- Members of the House Energy Committee are preparing legislation that aims to make it easier for the Energy Department to gain funding it needs to keep a proposed Nevada nuclear waste repository on track. The bill would remove budget restraints from a special fund used to pay for studies and possible construction of a repository at Yucca Mountain 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Taking the nuclear waste fund "off-budget" would remove it from spending limits that Congress sets each year through the appropriations process, enabling program managers to claim as much as they may need. "By moving the nuclear waste fund off budget, this bill takes a large step toward insulating the fund from competition from other federal programs," House staff said in a printed analysis. Opponents of the move, including officials from Nevada, say the budget change would make it more difficult to keep tabs on the Yucca Mountain program through the congressional "power of the purse." The nuclear waste provision is a small part of a new energy bill that also boosts hydroelectric power, coal technology and state and federal energy conservation programs. The bill was written by leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, including chairman Billy Tauzin, R-La.; senior Democrat John Dingell., D-Mich.; and Reps. Joe Barton, R-Texas, and Rick Boucher, D-Va., a panel spokeswoman said. A draft of the legislation was circulating Monday. The House energy and air quality subcommittee, headed by Barton, was scheduled to begin discussing it today and Wednesday. The Bush administration was not involved in negotiations for the bill, but was kept informed, said Samantha Jordan, a committee spokeswoman. The nuclear waste section mirrors a provision that passed the committee in the last Congress, Jordan said. That bill eventually stalled short of passage. Supporters of the concept say Congress still could review how the Energy Department spends its money, but would have less need to limit how much is spent from the fund. The fund, built from utility fees, has raised about $17 billion since its inception almost 20 years ago and has paid for most of the roughly $7 billion spent so far on the nuclear waste program. The fund contains about $9 billion now. Jordan said the legislation would "put a fence" around the nuclear waste fund, ensuring its contents would be spent on the repository and not other federal programs. "It removes it from being able to be used for anything else in the budget," she said. "It opens up the path for DOE to be able to use the money." Congress has reduced the Energy Department's budget for Yucca Mountain over the past five years by millions of dollars, forcing program delays. Backers of the budget change say the squeeze will get only tighter when repository construction will require the department to request more than $1.2 billion annually from the fund beginning in fiscal 2005. At recent committee hearings, Barton and Dingell have urged that the nuclear waste fund be removed from the budget constraints. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham has said the Bush administration has been seeking ways to gain access to the account. At least three other House committees are scheduled to focus on energy bills this week, two months after the Bush administration issued a report calling for legislation and policies to encourage energy exploration and conservation. This story is located at: http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/2001/Jul-10-Tue-2001/news/16503173.html ***************************************************************** 18 Whither Plutonium? The Dallas Morning News: Opinion: Editorial A waste worthy of worry 07/09/2001 Sure, America is troubled by its tons of low-level radioactive waste and worried about its long-term care. But think big  terroristically speaking. High-level nuclear waste is the stuff of movies. All that plutonium that can be retrieved from spent reactor fuel and excess weapons grade plutonium is enough to build thousands of huge bombs. Lex Luthor is in his element. Nuclear countries facing the dilemma of what to do with their highly radioactive waste have discussed options from reprocessing to burial. One major problem stands out: security. Someone could pilfer the stuff. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has a novel idea. Put all the plutonium in a museum, a Plutonium Memorial. If all the plutonium were in one place, it would have to be well protected. The magazine even has a design contest at www.thebulletin.org/contest/rules.html. Will this be the museum where you send your worst enemy to get him glowing? Maybe, but the magazine requires technical details be followed since plutonium can become rather nasty if mishandled. Just think about the endless possibilities (the stuff exists for thousands of years). Marvel Comics could underwrite the building, Donald Trump could develop it and Russia and China could compete for the site (but wouldn't it be more fun in France or Acapulco?). Consider it a monument to our age and the nondegradable waste man has generated. Stephen Schwartz, publisher of the Bulletin, says, "It's a serious contest. Do we expect a memorial to get built? No." But he says it gets people thinking about the very real problem of nuclear waste. Yes, it does. 2000 EPpy Award for Best specialized selection in a newspaper ***************************************************************** 19 What to spend, how to spend it The Times TUESDAY JULY 10 2001 BY VANORA BENNETT The Kyoto treaty signals the first attempt by world leaders to make policy for generations who will not even be born for decades to come. But making environmental policy for the future is a nightmare of equations made up almost entirely of “x”s. If policymakers can’t agree on what is happening to the environment now, and what is likely to happen to it in the future, how can they agree on what to do about it, or how much they should pay? The cost of Kyoto to the participating nations by 2010 will — if agreement is made — be $160 billion to $350 billion a year, probably shared between the US, the EU, Japan, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. If that money does not go on Kyoto and CO emissions cuts now, would governments be better off spending it differently, or later? Would they be wiser to close down a coal mine and build a nuclear power plant — or vice versa? It is not just US Government officials who argue that Kyoto is a waste of time. A Danish academic, Bjorn Lomborg, makes the same case from the Left in his book The Skeptical Environmentalist. This former Greenpeace member says that the total cost of global warming over the next century, if it goes unchecked, will be almost £5 trillion, through flooding, extreme weather, crop failure and disease. He estimates that Kyoto would add an extra $4 trillion to this bill by limiting emissions to 1990 levels — yet the result would be merely to postpone a 2C temperature rise by six years, from 2094 to 2100. “The world ends up paying for the trouble from global warming twice over,” he says. “First, every year from 2050 we pay 2 per cent of GDP cutting CO, and when we reach 2100 we pay 2 per cent more because of higher temperatures which are almost unaffected by the Kyoto Protocol. It is just not a very good deal. It doesn’t pay according to any sensible analysis.” Advocates of Kyoto, however, question high estimates of its cost because, they say, they are calculated without taking in the great economic benefits that will arise from new renewable energy technology. Stephen Tindale, executive director of Greenpeace UK, says a $350 billion a year figure for the protocol’s price is “specious”, and that the agreement would boost the economy. “The high figures that are quoted assume no flexibility and ignore the fact that environmental regulation has always helped the development of new technology,” he says. “The potential size of the solar industry, of the fuel cell industry, of offshore and onshore wind energy, is huge and will be stimulated by this treaty. I don’t think there will be economic costs to Kyoto, if looked at as a whole. There will be costs to particular sectors, but benefits for others. “Financially, the costs of doing nothing arise from the impact on insurance, changes to agriculture, the water industry, infrastructure changes, and the costs of coastal defence. Of course, there are also non-financial aspects — impacts on people, on habitats, on animals and so on. We have to minimise these.” Writing in the London Review of Books last month, Murray Sayle outlined three of the policy “alternatives” now in the air. Two involve making no new plans. One of these advocates doing nothing because new technologies will find ways of reducing greenhouse gas emissions which will cost less than anything currently on offer. A second is based on the notion that global warming is a natural process, only marginally linked to our increased use of fossil fuels, which at worst humans are speeding up a little. There have been four major Ice Ages in the last 650,000 years, and many smaller ones. Earth may be entering another pre-Ice Age warming period; whatever we do will not halt it. A third, more active, policy, proposed by Bush officials as part of America’s National Energy Policy, would be to put more emphasis on nuclear power. Nuclear power has been unfashionable since the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986. Yet because uranium does not emit warming gases nuclear power is now getting a favourable reception from governments. Robin Jeffrey, the head of British Energy, is, for instance, urging the Government to create conditions that would attract shareholders to back a programme to replace its eight existing nuclear stations, which are due to be phased out between 2011 and 2035. But IAEA calculations also show that today’s nuclear plants cost $2,000 per kw capacity to build, against $1,200 per kw for new coal plants and $500 per kw for natural gas. There are hidden costs, too: industrialised OECD countries spent $159 billion in research on nuclear power between 1974 and 1998. Using energy more efficiently might sound like a small, soft option, but according to the chief economist of Deutsche Bank Group it could save the profligate US so much energy that it could already meet its Kyoto requirements without economic damage. The Clinton Administration last year proposed a series of efficiency standards for new appliances. Making air conditioners in California more efficient would, in the next four years, save enough energy to help to avoid the construction of 11 power plants on the West Coast, and 120 nationwide, by 2010. Take the proposed new standards for fridges, washing machines, water heaters and light bulbs into account, too, and the energy saving by 2010 could be big enough to light all American homes for two years — at a very low cost. The only people able to judge whether we have done the right thing will be our children, or our children’s children, who will inherit the Earth we leave to them. Copyright 2001 Times Newspapers Ltd. This service is provided ***************************************************************** 20 Bill aims to ease Yucca funding barriers Today: July 10, 2001 at 11:07:33 PDT By Mary Manning and Benjamin Grove LAS VEGAS SUN WASHINGTON -- A recently drafted House energy bill would give the Energy Department direct access to $10 billion in a federal fund created to develop the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project. The move would effectively remove Congress' responsibility of setting a specific Yucca budget each year. House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans on Monday released the draft bill that contains the Yucca budget reforms. The committee was scheduled to discuss it today and Wednesday. One leading advocate, Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, said the provision would allow the DOE to move more quickly on Yucca, which is being studied as the site to bury the nation's high-level nuclear waste. Since 1982 about $17 billion has been paid into the government's nuclear waste fund by U.S. utility ratepayers who use nuclear-generated electricity. Ratepayers, through a special tax, contribute about $800 million to $850 million each year, according to a bill summary. The fund's goal is to pay for a permanent burial ground for highly radioactive spent fuel rods -- nuclear waste -- from the nation's 103 active nuclear power plants. The DOE has spent about $7 billion during the past 20 years to study Yucca Mountain, singled out by Congress as the site for a nuclear repository. If approved, the site 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas would eventually be home to 77,000 tons of waste. The DOE is expected to recommend the site later this year. It would open in 2010 at the earliest. Current law states that Congress each year must authorize expenditures from the waste fund and then "appropriate" -- that is, actually spend -- money on the project. The result is that lawmakers each year argue about exactly how much to spend on the project, and Nevada lawmakers, who oppose the Yucca plan, fight to decrease funding. The new legislation would allow Congress to authorize spending for the project, but not appropriate a specific amount. In short, Congress would set a general spending budget, although the DOE would have free access to the fund to spend as it sees fit. "If they want a billion, they can take a billion," Barton spokeswoman Samantha Jordan said. Jordan stressed that Congress would maintain strict oversight. "This definitely does not just throw the Yucca Mountain budget to the wind," she said. "The Department of Energy would still be accountable for every penny (it spends)." Many nuclear power industry leaders have supported taking Yucca spending "off-budget" for years, although its top lobby group, the Nuclear Energy Institute, has not taken an official position, spokesman Mitch Singer said. As it stands, Singer said, Yucca must compete with other congressional priorities. The bill would change that, he said. "If the money has been put aside for a specific purpose, why can't it be spent on the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain without being held up by Congress?" Singer said. But Nevada's four-member congressional delegation strongly opposes giving DOE access to the waste fund. The lawmakers, led by Appropriations Committee member and No. 2 Senate Democrat Harry Reid, have long battled to decrease Yucca budgets. Reid "advocates vigorous congressional oversight," spokesman Nathan Naylor said. Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said the legislation does not seem to have support in the Senate. "They have made runs at this (proposal) before," Ensign said. "It's typical that they are trying to be able to do this without congressional oversight. We're going to continue to vigorously oppose anything that would make it easier to build Yucca Mountain. And this would make it easier." Rep. Jim Gibbons, R-Nev., plans to write letters to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham and President Bush. He noted that the legislation has the support of a bipartisan group of influential lawmakers. "This gives free rein to the DOE to run Yucca Mountain and have (its) own spending spree," Gibbons said. "I'll do everything I can to stop the bill." The DOE asked Congress for about $445 million for Yucca projects this year. Last year, it asked for $437 million, and Congress appropriated $390 million. All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 21 High Noon in the West TIME.com - The War Over the West RICHARD BARNES FOR TIME View from the top of Yucca Mountain, northwest of Las Vegas "While westerners are frequently caricatured as being either tree huggers or strip miners, they have complicated feelings about the land. Many conservationists have a libertarian streak, while ranchers and loggers can show a caretaker's attitude toward the land they work." There's a war out there, and it's pitting oilmen and industrialists against environmentalists and ranchers. The stakes are high. What do we want: The fat of the land or its grandeur? And what kind of shoot-out are we willing to put up with? On the first evening of summer, a grizzly bear and her yearling cub foraged for roots and grubs high up on the western slopes of the Lamar Valley in Yellowstone National Park. Farther up the valley, a group of visitors watched a pack of coyotes dispersing hurriedly after a wolf's howl pealed through the trees. As the sun lingered on the peaks, the valley took on a timeless quality, and the human visitors went quiet as they gazed at the landscape and the wildlife around them. Few realized that 2,000 miles away, in Washington, a series of decisions were being made that could threaten the Yellowstone ecosystem. The previous evening the Interior Department had announced it was blocking a plan to reintroduce grizzly bears to the Bitterroot Wilderness area in Idaho and Montana, northwest of Yellowstone, even though biologists say that such a reintroduction is ultimately necessary to maintain the genetic diversity of the bears in the park. The following week, Interior announced it was thinking about lifting a ban on snowmobiles in Yellowstone that had been agreed upon last year. At the same time, the Bush Administration was increasing pressure to open the Bridger-Teton National Forest just south of the park for oil and gas drilling. Yellowstone, established in 1872 as the first national park, has become a focal point in the latest chapter in the epic Battle for the West that has raged for two centuries. The Bush Administration is pushing hard to open up large tracts of public land to drilling, logging, nuclear-waste storage and off-road vehicles. Whether it means exploring for oil in the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, easing up on Clinton Administration road closings that put a third of the national forests off limits to logging or suspending new listings on the Endangered Species Act, the message from the White House is clear: the West is open for business. "I believe people should make decisions about their own lives," said Interior Secretary Gale Norton in an interview with Time last week. "Decisions made from behind a desk in Washington seldom reflect the knowledge and love that people have of their own communities." Last week that conflict between federal and local came to a head in Klamath Falls, Ore., where angry farmers forced open an irrigation canal that had been closed off by the Bureau of Reclamation to save an endangered species of suckerfish. Some 1,400 farmers in the Klamath River Basin have been cut off from irrigation since April and watched their land dry up because a federal court has said the water must be preserved for the suckerfish, protected under the controversial ESA. Local businesses are closing down, farm laborers are leaving and ranchers are selling off their livestock. "People are angry," says Alvin Cheyne, 80, who farms 670 acres in the Klamath Basin. "What the government has done is unbelievable." Feelings are running so high in Klamath Falls that even the local sheriff, Tim Evinger, decided not to intervene as the protesters opened the head gates from the Upper Klamath Lake with a chainsaw. In Washington, Secretary Norton called the Klamath showdown "a very difficult situation. Something I hope we can avoid in the future with more long-term planning." Norton also said that her department would be examining the ESA, which Republicans and some Democrats have begun to say needs revision. "We are looking at the science as to what the endangered species are so that we really have an understanding." In the stories that follow, TIME explores how the new push for development has further stoked the fires of debate across the region as its citizens try to figure out how to make the best use of the West's natural resources. In Wyoming, wary ranchers are caught in the middle of a gas-exploration boom they can't control. In Colorado, a U.S. Forest Service plan to limit motorized access to the White River National Forest has angered off-road-vehicle enthusiasts. In Nevada, a proposed nuclear-waste dump deep inside Yucca Mountain has stirred up bipartisan opposition. In Oregon, Clinton's designation of the Cascade-Siskiyou forest as a national monument is being reviewed by Bush, setting off arguments over public and private land use by loggers, local residents and environmentalists. Graphic by Joe Lertola. Adapted for the web by Jim Johnson Copyright © 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 22 Potential Nuclear Nightmare [Africa News Service] Summary: Johannesburg, Jul 10, 2001 (Earthlife Africa/All Africa Global Media via COMTEX)-- South Africans would be right in being horrified at proposals for Pelindaba, 2 km from the Cradle of Humankind. Story Filed: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:20 PM EST Johannesburg, Jul 10, 2001 (Earthlife Africa/All Africa Global Media via COMTEX)-- South Africans would be right in being horrified at proposals for Pelindaba, 2 km from the Cradle of Humankind. Not only does the Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa (NECSA) wish to build and operate a nuclear fuel manufacturing plant, with an intended capacity over 40 years of over 200 MILLION kg of radioactive fuel; they also plan to build, operate and "commercialise" a radioactive waste smelter, to smelt local and other waste, which will spew over 5 kg of radioactive material into the air every year; now it appears that Pelindaba may become a site for Eskom's proposed Pebble Bed Modular Reactor - a new, untested version of a nuclear reactor that has been abandoned everywhere else it has been tried, including the USA and Germany. The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism appears content to slip this newly proposed site into an existing Environmental Impact Assessment process, designed to consider developing such a plant at the Koeberg site. Having failed to persuade the people or authorities in the Western Cape that an additional nuclear power plant is desirable or even acceptable, Eskom hopes for more success with their speculative sales pitch in the North West Province. Armed with their unsubstantiated job creation figures and a lot of very wishful projections of possible revenue (irresponsibly cited without context in some newspapers), Eskom is relying on authorities in North West Province to be more credulous than elsewhere. "The potential radiation hazards, singly and cumulatively, are unacceptable for people living within at least a 20 km radius and for The Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site and Hartebeestpoort Dam tourist attractions," says Earthlife Africa's Nuclear Energy Costs the Earth Campaign Co-ordinator, Muna Lakhani. "Even as a volunteer organisation, with limited resources, we have more than sufficient research at hand to show that the notion of a "safe dose" of radiation is a complete fiction." "The International Atomic Energy Agency, a pro-nuclear body, has expressed concerns about the safety of the PBMR in the international publication, Nucleonics Weekly. The economic figures originally quoted by Eskom have already proved to be way off the mark; anticipated costs are climbing steadily and a rigorous economic assessment that was promised for early this year has not been released. An additional concern is the historically high cost of decommissioning nuclear plants and the long term costs of waste management, for which there is no accepted or licensed disposal facility anywhere in the world." Earthlife Africa are on record as requesting access to the 'Detailed Feasibility Study' that is supposed to inform a cabinet decision on whether the PBMR project should be taken forward, to allow for independent expert analysis. People wishing more information are welcome to contact Muna Lakhani on 082- 416-9160 or muna@iafrica.com. Issued by: "Nuclear Energy Costs the Earth" Steering Committee, Earthlife Africa - Johannesburg Nuclear Energy Costs the Earth Campaign. Cell: 082-416- 9160. E-mail: muna@iafrica.com Copyright Earthlife Africa. Distributed by All Africa Global Media(AllAfrica.com) Copyright © 2001, Africa News Service, all rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 23 Not In Our Backyard TIME.com - The War Over the West RICHARD BARNES FOR TIME Inside the tunnel of the Yucca Mountain Project in Nevada—the proposed site of the nation's high-level nuclear waste repository. "For the past 14 years, Yucca has been the Department of Energy's only site for a permanent repository in which to store nuclear waste for at least the next 10,000 years. Some $3.5 billion has already been poured into the project, which could eventually cost $60 billion." Nevadans, battling a nuclear-waste dump in their state, now have a powerful ally in Senator Harry Reid BY DOUGLAS WALLER The view from the top of Yucca Mountain in Nevada sweeps down past hillsides tangled with creosote bush to the rocky, sun-baked desert floor, with Las Vegas about 90 miles to the southeast. The proximity to that city is a problem for Nevadans—and perhaps for the future of nuclear power in this country—because the Federal Government wants to bury inside Yucca Mountain the most toxic garbage that humankind has produced: 77,000 tons of highly radioactive waste generated by America's 103 nuclear power plants. A thousand feet below the mountain's peak, a tunneling machine called the "Yucca Mucker" has bored a 25-ft.-wide shaft into its center; inside that shaft, technicians in hard hats are running tests to see whether Yucca can begin receiving high-level nuclear waste, perhaps by 2010. For the past 14 years, Yucca has been the Department of Energy's only site for a permanent repository in which to store nuclear waste for at least the next 10,000 years. Some $3.5 billion has already been poured into the project, which could eventually cost $60 billion. There is no Plan B. That makes Nevadans angry and afraid. They are worried that radioactivity from the underground storage facility could eventually leak, contaminating nearby groundwater. They have protested with lawsuits, letter-writing campaigns and public demonstrations near the site in Nevada where nuclear devices were once exploded. Yet they have been powerless to block the project. Nevada has long been the Federal Government's atomic playground (928 nuclear bombs were detonated at the Nevada Test Site from 1951 to 1992), and the state's politicians haven't had any clout in Washington. Now one of them does. Last May, Nevada's Democratic Senator Harry Reid succeeded in persuading Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords to bolt the Republican Party. Jeffords' switch gave Democrats control of the Senate—and promoted Reid from minority to majority whip, a perch he is currently trying to use to block the Bush Administration from putting the nuclear dump in his state. "This is wrong what they're trying to do," insists Reid. Last May, majority leader Tom Daschle flew to Las Vegas to speak at a fund raiser for Reid. "As long as we're in the majority," Daschle vowed, "[the Yucca Mountain project] is dead." Can they make good on the threat? Federal bureaucrats doubt it. "It doesn't matter what Harry Reid says," says Jerry King, the project manager of the Energy Department's Yucca Mountain feasibility study. "We are going ahead full speed." By the end of this year, Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham will probably recommend to President Bush that nuclear waste be buried at the repository. Bush's energy plan calls for construction of new nuclear power plants (the technology now supplies about 20% of the nation's electricity), but that won't happen unless the industry finds a place to store the spent fuel rods now being held in temporary facilities at plants across the country. The state of Nevada can veto Bush's decision, but the veto can be overridden if both houses of Congress pass resolutions approving the site. And that's where Reid has a chance. As leaders of the majority, Daschle and Reid are in a position to prevent the Senate from passing its approval resolution. They can't prevent the resolution from coming to a vote, but they can mobilize Democrats and can expect help from such G.O.P. dissenters as John Ensign, Nevada's other Senator, who has warned the White House that it will lose his vote on the energy plan if nuclear waste goes to Yucca. Bush is paying attention—he doesn't have Republican votes to spare. In a delicious irony, Reid—who is chairman of the Appropriations Committee's energy and water development subcommittee—now controls Yucca's purse strings. That means Yucca will be examined with a microscope to "make sure they can justify every penny," Reid says. He plans to shift money into studies of alternatives to the Yucca repository, such as storing the nuclear waste in concrete "dry casks" at the power plants where the waste is generated. But Reid faces an uphill battle. "Nobody wants the waste," explains Alaska Senator Frank Murkowski, the senior Republican on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The 31 states that have nuclear power plants are not about to stand with Nevada—who wants radioactive garbage piling up in their backyard? Even some Nevada politicians realize that. "I can read the writing on the wall," says Nevada state senator Bill O'Donnell. "We're going to get the waste." O'Donnell believes Reid should negotiate with the Administration now so that Nevada would get something from the deal, such as a railroad through less-populated areas to transport the waste, or a goodwill grant of federal land, which makes up 87% of the state. With polls showing as many as 80% of Nevadans opposed to the project, however, bargaining would be political suicide. Before he makes any deal to take nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, Reid says, he'll be "on top of the Capitol doing a full body dive." That's a performance the nuclear industry would pay admission to see. With reporting by D. Brian Burghart/Yucca Mountain Graphic by Joe Lertola. Adapted for the web by Jim Johnson Copyright © 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 24 Injury ends SA protester's antinuclear walk ABC News - Antinuclear campaigner Franco Princi has abandoned his protest walk from Adelaide to Woomera because of injury. He had undertaken the journey to raise public awareness about the dangers of the proposed nuclear waste dump for the state's outback. However, Mr Princi says he has had to give up his plans after pulling a muscle just outside the Clare Valley, and aggravating it after limping onto Seven Hill where he has been stranded since Wednesday. "Lo and behold, my thigh is actually swollen and has actually got worse and so the bad news is, it looks like I am going to have to abandon my walk because it seems that I just can't walk," Mr Princi said. © 1999 Australian Broadcasting Corporation ***************************************************************** 25 Letters from SSAB to oppose cleanup cuts Oak Ridger Online --> Story last updated at 11:04 a.m. on Monday, July 9, 2001 by Paul Parson Oak Ridger staff The Oak Ridge Site-Specific Advisory Board objects to cuts in the Department of Energy's fiscal year 2002 cleanup budget and is set to take action Wednesday night on two letters that declare its stance. Also, the board will hear a presentation on the cleanup program during its meeting that begins at 6 p.m. in the Garden Plaza Hotel. The SSAB's letters address the fact that Oak Ridge's cleanup budget may be cut by more than $90 million in FY 2002 when compared to this fiscal year -- from $423.7 million to $332.457 million. In a draft letter to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, the SSAB states that "these budgetary actions will have severe negative impacts on the Oak Ridge Reservation remediation activities and constitute a serious betrayal of the trust placed in DOE by the Oak Ridge community." A proposed letter to Gov. Don Sundquist urges him to insist that the money be restored to the budget. The SSAB voted to write these letters at its June 13 meeting and could vote Wednesday night to send them. In addition, Rod Nelson, assistant manager for DOE's Oak Ridge Environmental Management program, is slated to provide an overview of the program during the meeting. His talk is scheduled to begin shortly after the meeting commences. The SSAB is a federally appointed citizens' panel that provides advice and recommendations to DOE on its Oak Ridge cleanup program. The group was formed in 1995 and chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Also meeting this week is the Citizens' Advisory Panel of the Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee. The group will meet at 5:15 p.m. in the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation office, 761 Emory Valley Road. The Citizens' Advisory Panel provides advice to local, state and federal officials regarding DOE environmental management decisions. The LOC is a nonprofit organization funded by the state of Tennessee. All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger ***************************************************************** 26 Anniston native is one of nation's top nuclear men The Anniston Star Online 07-10-2001, Hackney has worked at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for more than 20 years. Anniston Lincoln Mercury Dodge, 1229 S. Quintard (256) 236-7635 Anniston native Charles Hackney is one of the nation's top nuclear men, and he's got a medal to prove it. Hackney recently was honored with the second-highest award at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for protecting public health and safety. The Anniston native received a Meritorious Service Award, which consisted of a silver medal and $6,000 on June 7. He and his wife Barbara were flown to the commission headquarters in Washington, D.C., for the award ceremony. The Commission recognized Hackney's performance as a regional state liaison officer between state, local, Native Americans and other federal agencies within his region regarding the regulation of nuclear materials and facilities. Based out of Arlington, Texas, his region expands 21 states west of the Mississippi River including Hawaii, Guam and Alaska. It is one of four regions the Commission covers in the United States. When there is a threat of hurricanes, he works overtime. "We've been very luck we haven't had any real emergencies," Hackney said, catching himself by saying it wasn't luck but a result of good planning, design and training. Among other achievements, Hackney helped develop the first agency emergency response plan and incident response center for the Commission in Arlington, Texas. After graduating from Anniston High School in 1951, Hackney briefly attended Jacksonville State. He left Jacksonville to be a "little grunt" in the Army for two years where he first learned about radioactive material in Japan in 1953. The Army trained him in chemical biological warfare, but he never had to use it when he was in the service. After the Army, he attended Auburn for a year and then settled in Fort Worth, where he took up chemistry, math and physics at Texas Wesleyan University. While going to school, he started working at General Dynamics, an aerospace company. The company was working on a nuclear aerospace program for the Air Force when he worked there from 1956 to 1973. Initially, he monitored sites for radioactive material as a health physics technician. Then he became a reactor operator and helped with the efforts to develop a nuclear airplane. "The moon sounded like a better deal for world domination than to have a nuclear airplane," he said of when the plans for the airplane were scrapped by the Kennedy administration in an all-out effort to put a man on the moon. After working 17 years at General Dynamics, he worked on nuclear projects for Gulf States Utilities for seven years. Then he went to the Commission in Arlington, where he remains today after 21 years. He has fond memories of northeast Alabama, especially of his family and high school football games between Gadsden and Anniston. His Aunts Pauline Bradley and Billie Hackney reside in Anniston. After spending several years in Texas, Hackney also misses Alabama barbecue and Buffalo Rock ginger ale. The 68-year-old said he hasn't thought much about retiring. Of the recent recognition, he said, "Maybe that's my 15 minutes of fame." Copyright 2001 Consolidated Publishing. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | ***************************************************************** 27 ADAMS: Items of Interest - Monday, July 09, 2001 State of Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects ADAMS - Items of Interest Recent Released Documents Added - Monday, July 09, 2001 These documents and others may be retrieved at the NRC PERR web site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item ID: 011870108 Accession Number: ML011660387 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:12:09 AM Title: 05/08/01 Meeting Summary With Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG)And NRC To Foster Communication Links Between The WOG And NRC. Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD1 Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870109 Accession Number: ML011800190 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:12:20 AM Title: 06/20/01 Memo to Jeff Bingaman on Areas of Common Ground Between Republican & Democratic Energy Policy Bills. Author Affiliation: US SEN, Comm on Energy & Natural Resources Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870100 Accession Number: ML011870068 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:11:21 AM Title: 06/21/2001 Meeting Summary With Entergy Operations, Inc. Re End-of-Cycle Performance Assessment for River Bend Station. Author Affiliation: NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-B Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870377 Accession Number: ML011780649 Date Added: 7/6/01 5:16:27 PM Title: 06/21/2001, Meeting with Exelon Generation Company Re Requested Extension for the Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test. Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPDI Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870326 Accession Number: ML011870304 Date Added: 7/6/01 4:14:20 PM Title: 07/09/2001 - 08/13/2001 Commisison Meetings - Sunshine FRN. Author Affiliation: NRC/SECY Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870101 Accession Number: ML011800393 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:11:26 AM Title: 07/13/2001 Public Meeting to Discuss Safety System Unavailability Performance Indicator Revisions to the Reactor Oversight Process Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DIPM/IIPB Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870084 Accession Number: ML011800303 Date Added: 7/6/01 8:31:55 AM Title: 07/17-18/01 Notice of meeting to discuss with Exelon and DOE overview of codes and standards used for the PBMR design. Author Affiliation: NRC/RES/DSARE Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870103 Accession Number: ML011860072 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:11:42 AM Title: 07/18/2001; Meeting with NEI Re Status of the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process, the Effort to Standardize Licensee Submittals, the results of the Reduction in Regulatory Burden Workshop, and Various NRR Office Instructions Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4 Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870394 Accession Number: ML011870487 Date Added: 7/6/01 5:18:43 PM Title: 08/06/2001 - Notice of Licensee Meeting - Arizona Public Service Company (Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant), relative to status of activities related to the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) 07/06/2001. Author Affiliation: NRC/RGN-IV/DNMS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870112 Accession Number: ML011800397 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:12:39 AM Title: 2001 TMI Annual Assessment Meeting Slides. Author Affiliation: NRC/RGN-I Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870119 Accession Number: ML011790529 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:13:17 AM Title: Agenda for June 13, 2001 Public Meeting. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870123 Accession Number: ML011790525 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:13:43 AM Title: Attendance list for June 13, 2001 Public Meeting. Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870135 Accession Number: ML011790531 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:14:33 AM Title: First Presentation of June 13, 2001 Public Meeting - Risk Information in the Regulation of Materials & Waste Disposal. Case Study on Uranium Recovery(Slides). Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870184 Accession Number: ML003759900 Date Added: 7/6/01 12:11:59 PM Title: G20000488/LTR-00-0630 - Ltr: Dana Powers, ACRS re Union of Concerned Scientists Report, " Nuclear Plant Studies: Failing the Grade" Author Affiliation: NRC/ACRS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870060 Accession Number: ML011780440 Date Added: 7/6/01 8:30:05 AM Title: Ltr to A. Chowdhury: Repository Design Thermal-Mechanical Effects Key Technical Issue Intermediate Millstone No. 20-01402.671.145: Progress for Decovalex III Task 2. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/DWM/HLWB Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870156 Accession Number: ML011790510 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:16:09 AM Title: Memo from C. Drummmond, RTG to L. Kokajko, RTG Re: Summary - Case Study on Uranium Recovery Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870387 Accession Number: ML011870355 Date Added: 7/6/01 5:18:19 PM Title: NRC Meeting with Exelon Generation Company on Request for Extension of the Containment Intetgrated Leak Rate Test at Peach Botteom Unit 3. Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870090 Accession Number: ML011800328 Date Added: 7/6/01 8:32:24 AM Title: STP-01-052, Final Rule -- 98 Percent Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2001. Author Affiliation: NRC/STP Document/Report Number: STP-01-052 _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870171 Accession Number: ML011790545 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:17:23 AM Title: Third Presentation of June 13, 2001 Public Meeting -Case Stusy on the Regulation of Uranium Recovery Facilities. Stakeholder Feedback (Slides). Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011870172 Accession Number: ML011790548 Date Added: 7/6/01 11:17:27 AM Title: Transcript of June 13, 2001 Public Meeting regarding Stakeholders Meeting on Uranium Recovery.Pages 1-69. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS Document/Report Number: ***************************************************************** 28 Your Views: Plant names linked to product - By Jim Phelps Oak Ridger Online --> Story last updated at 11:47 a.m. on Monday, July 9, 2001 Plant names linked to product To The Oak Ridger: It is well known that the "K-25" plant code is linked to the gas diffusion process that was developed by the Kellogg Co. and the plant's design used 25 percent of the Manhattan Project's funding to make "product 25," or HEU. The plants' designators did not come from grid maps, but from issue linked to the plants. The projects designers spent 25 percent of the funds trying to keep the fluoride's toxic effects contained, but failed to do this in the long run. It is suggested that the three plants code name designators link to religion as the X in X-10 designation is linked to God and the Ten Commandments and the Y in Y-12 to Yahweh and the 12 disciples. The K-25 designator has religious significance as well because this plant is highly related to fluoride's toxic health effects and these highly linked to old world volcanic toxic effect problems. Events in the old world from Noah landing on the largest land mass volcano in the world, Ararat, to the disappearance of Sodom and Gomorra from volcanic linked subsidence from the East African Rift Valley are fluorides related. The K-25 designator is linked to some of the most veiled religion issues. Today, the extremely high fluoride emissions from the K-25 chemical processing plant are becoming known to the public and the associated health and environmental effects becoming highly suspect as the dominate cause of worker and community illnesses. K-25 emitted hundreds of tons of fluorides and millions of pounds of freon into the atmosphere each year of its operation. Fluoride's toxic effects are linked to the earliest of industrial emissions affecting health and agriculture. Few persons recognize it, but the closing of the K-25 plant in the 1980s was highly determined by these toxic releases and the illness they caused. One can read a technical article review report similar to one I did in the 1980s that prompted the closing of K-25 at URL: http://members.aol.com/magnu96196/cfs.html. This report's message became the standard for toxic disease cause and effect in the 1980s in Oak Ridge that related directly to their extreme liabilities. Jim Phelps Knoxville All Contents ©Copyright The Oak Ridger ***************************************************************** 29 ADAMS: Items of Interest - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 State of Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects ADAMS - Items of Interest Recent Released Documents Added - Tuesday, July 10, 2001 These documents and others may be retrieved at the NRC PERR web site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item ID: 011900101 Accession Number: ML011840078 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:26:02 AM Title: 02/07-02/09/2001 Proposed official visit to Mexico by US Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner Jeffrey Merrifield. Author Affiliation: NRC/OCM/JSM Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900011 Accession Number: ML011790303 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:11:02 AM Title: 05/14/2001 and 05/15/2001 E-mails from D. Fogle and M. Kelso, Texas, Regarding MARSSIM Course - Tuition vs Space Available Author Affiliation: State of TX Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900073 Accession Number: ML011720475 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:21:08 AM Title: 06/11/2001, D. C. Cook, Units 1 and 2, Summary of Public Meeting with Indiana Michigan Company RE Containment Structural Issues Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD3 Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900012 Accession Number: ML011830409 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:11:05 AM Title: 06/28/2001, Draft Minutes: Region I MRB Meeting. Author Affiliation: NRC/STP Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900263 Accession Number: ML011900313 Date Added: 7/9/01 5:14:51 PM Title: 07/18/01 Mtg Notice, Gesellschaft fur Nuklear-Behalter mbH, to make presentation on program and schedule to complete license application for CASTOR X/32 spent fuel storage cask design in full compliance w/ NRC requirements. Agenda attached. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/SFPO Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900265 Accession Number: ML011900396 Date Added: 7/9/01 5:15:31 PM Title: 07/19/01 - Mtg w/ Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, re discuss the design of the Model No. Traveller fresh fuel transport package and other transportation package issues. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/SFPO Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011910189 Accession Number: ML011870588 Date Added: 7/10/01 11:41:06 AM Title: 07/20/01 - Meeting Notice: Transnuclear West to discuss an amendment to store high burnup fuel in the Standarized NUHOMS(R) System. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/SFPO Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900114 Accession Number: ML011840115 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:27:05 AM Title: 2001 BWXT Public Meeting Summary (Performance Review) Enclosure 2, Handout. Author Affiliation: NRC Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900078 Accession Number: ML011790183 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:22:34 AM Title: 5/15/01 - Meeting Summary of Meeting on ESP Efforts Author Affiliation: NRC/NRR/DRIP/FLO Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900135 Accession Number: ML011870592 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:44:22 AM Title: 7/19/2001 Meeting with Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Nuclear Fuel Services to Discuss NFS Planned Submittal for Safety Condition S-47 Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/FCSS/FCLB Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900022 Accession Number: ML011840029 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:12:04 AM Title: ACRS Workshop on Regulatory Challenges for Future Power Plants. Author Affiliation: Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document/Report Number: ACRST-3157 _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900023 Accession Number: ML011840025 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:12:31 AM Title: Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee on Advanced Reactors, June 5,2001, pages 341-705. Author Affiliation: NRC/ACRS Document/Report Number: ACRST-3157 _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900024 Accession Number: ML011840034 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:13:05 AM Title: Advisory Committee Transcript Meeting Afternoon Session. Author Affiliation: NRC/ACRS Document/Report Number: ACRST-3157 _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900267 Accession Number: ML011840406 Date Added: 7/9/01 5:15:44 PM Title: Public Meeting Notice for 8/2-3/01, Part 40 Jurisdictional Working Group - in TWFN Auditorium. Author Affiliation: NRC/NMSS/IMNS/MSIB Document/Report Number: _________________________________________________________________ Item ID: 011900084 Accession Number: ML011800390 Date Added: 7/9/01 10:23:57 AM Title: Transcript of 06/19/01 Telephone Conference Call; pp. 1 - 57 Author Affiliation: Neal R. Gross & Co., Inc Document/Report Number: ***************************************************************** 30 Utah House Members Vote Against Transportation Study July 9, 2001 Letter to the Editor On June 28, Congress killed an effort to fund a study transportation of nuclear waste to the proposed burial site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The House of Representatives rejected 321-102 an amendment offered by Rep. Shelley Berkeley (D-NV) to the $27 billion energy and water spending bill that would have set aside $500,000 to examine potential road and rail shipment routes. Incredibly, all three Utah House members voted against the study. Opponents argued that it was premature to study nuclear waste transportation because Yucca Mt. has not been approved yet as the permanent repository for the waste, and that there would be ample time to assess transportation issues before the Nevada site opens, if it ever does. Berkeley called that logic "bass-ackwards". She’s right. The government has spent billions of dollars over the last two decades studying the suitability of Yucca Mt., but still hasn’t selected, much less examined in detail, the suitability of railway and/or highway routes that many thousands of shipments would follow. Some might suggest that Nevada’s congressional delegation is just trying to stir up opposition to the Yucca Mt. project by trying to play the transportation card in corridor communities across the country where some 50 million people live. But don’t those citizens have a right to know how nuclear waste shipments might affect them? And why don’t Utah’s congressmen want to know? After all, they unanimously oppose shipping nuclear waste to Utah for storage on the Skull Valley Goshute Reservation, at least in part due to concerns about transportation safety and diminished property values along the routes. Could it be they still think that if the Yucca Mt. project is approved, that the waste won’t stop in Utah? If so, they haven’t been paying attention because Private Fuel Storage fully intends to park their waste here regardless of the outcome with the Nevada site. Maybe their constituents need to remind them that it won’t matter whether the waste is headed to Yucca or Skull Valley if there’s an nuclear waste accident on I-15 or the railroads in Ogden, Salt Lake, Provo, St. George or other Utah "corridor communities". William R. Jensen Citizens Education Project 1224 Fenway Ave. Salt Lake City, UT 84102 (801)583-6456 ***************************************************************** 31 Envirocare puts plan for hot waste on ice [deseretnews.com] Monday, July 09, 2001 State OKs storage, but firm bows to opponents anyway By Donna Kemp Spangler Deseret News staff writer Envirocare of Utah is dumping its plan to store hotter radioactive waste in Utah despite the fact the state's top regulator on Monday gave his formal approval for the plan. Envirocare President Charles Judd said public opposition to an unrelated proposal pursued by the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, who want to store highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel on their reservation, has made it difficult to gain political support for Envirocare's proposal. The company may not close the door completely. "We just know right now we have no plans," Judd said. The news sent a shock wave throughout Utah. "I'm flabbergasted," said Bill Sinclair, director of the Division of Radiation Control. After poring over 750 public comments, he issued a final decision Monday that allowed Envirocare to move forward with its proposal to take so-called Class B and C wastes. In his decision, Sinclair said the wastes, which consist mainly of materials from nuclear power plants, research labs and hospitals, can be disposed of safely at its remote landfill in Tooele County. Approval from the Legislature and governor would have been required in addition to Sinclair's action. Opponents were particularly surprised given that approval was expected. In January, Sinclair granted tentative approval to the technical and safety aspects of Envirocare's license application. "It's great news," said Jason Groenewold, director of Families Against Incinerator Risk. "I'm glad Envirocare recognizes the interests of Utahns, that we're not going to sit back and let Utah become the nation's nuclear waste dumping ground," he said. Class B and C waste are hundreds, sometimes thousands, of times more radioactive than the Class A wastes, mostly contaminated soil that the company currently is licensed to accept. Yet they are much less toxic than the highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel that Private Fuel Storage, a consortium of nuclear utilities, wants to store on the Goshute Indian reservation. But Envirocare is dealing with a public relations problem inasmuch as the governor has launched a highly publicized campaign against the storage of high-level nuclear waste in the state. "We feel that pursuing our project while the PFS proposal is pending will only lead to more confusion and continued misrepresentation of the facts surrounding our efforts," Judd said. The 2001 Legislature passed a number of laws to stop the PFS proposal. PFS in turn filed a lawsuit, claiming the laws are unconstitutional. And Gov. Mike Leavitt has hired an attorney to defend the state. "Although the differences between the two proposals are extreme, the firestorm of controversy that has surrounded the PFS/Goshute proposal has spilled over onto Envirocare's project, making it difficult to obtain a properly documented, well-considered decision concerning Envirocare's proposal," Judd said. Envirocare had tried to distance its proposal from the Goshute plan. But a Deseret News poll showed Utahns don't care about the distinction. That poll released in January revealed that 84 percent of Utah residents oppose Envirocare's plan. Judd noted that the decision may have financial consequences. "This decision by Envirocare will definitely have a negative impact on future employment at Envirocare and will result in the loss of millions of dollars of lost revenue for Tooele County and the state of Utah," he said. E-MAIL: donna@desnews.com Front Page © 2001 Deseret News Publishing Company ***************************************************************** 32 BNFL investigates fuel rods accident Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Special report: Britain's nuclear industry Kirsty Scott Monday July 9, 2001 The Guardian An investigation has begun into an incident at a nuclear power station in which 24 radioactive fuel rods were dropped. The accident happened at the Chapelcross Magnox station near Annan in Dumfries and Galloway on Thursday, but details emerged only yesterday. A remote control device dropped the rods two feet on to the floor during a routine refuelling operation. Yesterday engineers were still working out how to retrieve the rods. The plant operator, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd, said the accident had been classed as the lowest level nuclear incident, and there had been no risk to personnel or the public. It had suspended the refuelling and, as a precaution, had also suspended refuelling at its Calder Hall plant in Cumbria, which uses the same refuelling system. Chapelcross houses four 50-megawatt reactors. It is also home to a military plant which produces radioactive tritium for Trident warheads. Fuel rods are changed using a remote control machine. It removes the irradiated uranium fuel elements, which are held in a large cylindrical basket, and replaces them with new ones. The reactor is shut down during this process. BNFL confirmed that shortly after 1am on Thursday a basket came loose as it was being lowered into a cooling pond, falling about two feet. Members of the plant's incident team were called as carbon dioxide was sprayed over the basket to ensure it did not catch fire. The government's watchdog, the nuclear installations inspectorate, has begun an inquiry alongside one by BNFL. A BNFL spokesman said: "At no time was there any increase in radiation within the area, and no personnel were affected. There is also no indication that the fuel has been damaged." A spokesman for the health and safety executive said it was aware of the incident and was investigating in conjunction with the inspectorate and engineers at the plant. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 ***************************************************************** 33 Safety inspectors called in to investigate fuel rods accident at nuclear power station © 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd 11 July 2001 07:09 GMT+1 By Martin Rickman 09 July 2001 Government safety inspectors are investigating an accident at a nuclear power station in which 24 fuel rods fell to the floor during a routine refuelling operation. British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) suspended refuelling at a reactor at Chapelcross, Dumfries and Galloway, and at a similar plant at Calder Hall, Cumbria, after Thursday's accident, which was only made public yesterday. Problems developed when a cylindrical basket that replaces the spent rods came loose and fell two feet as it was being lowered into a cooling pond. Chapelcross's incident team sprayed carbon dioxide over the basket to ensure it did not catch fire. The Nuclear Installations Inspectorate, the Government's safety watchdog, launched an inquiry into the incident alongside one being carried out by BNFL. A BNFL spokesman said: "We are in the process of looking in there to see what has gone on and to consider how we can recover the rods and return them to their position in the fuelling machine so we can discharge them and get appropriate clearance to return to refuelling. "At this stage, how difficult or otherwise that may be and so, how long that might take, is unknown. "At no time was there any increase in radiation within the area and no personnel were affected. There is also no indication that the fuel has been damaged," the spokesman added. BNFL stressed that the accident rated on the lowest level of an internationally agreed scale. A spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive said it was aware of the incident and that it was involved in the investigations. Brian Wilson, the Energy minister, said: "Any incident is treated very seriously and this is being investigated by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate. We should keep matters in perspective and it is important to point out that the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate has classified this as a low-level incident." ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARTICLES ***************************************************************** 1 Senate Debates Defense Spending July 09, 2001 WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate neared passage Monday of legislation providing $6.5 billion for defense and widely varying other programs, a bill that has become a prop in the partisan battle over the shrinking federal surplus. Senate approval was expected as early as Tuesday for the measure, which is mostly for the Pentagon but would do everything from helping the poor pay summer cooling bills to contributing $100 million to the United Nations' effort to halt the spread of AIDS. The House overwhelmingly passed a similar measure last month. With lawmakers filtering back to the Capitol after their weeklong July 4 recess, senators used a voice vote Monday to add $20 million to help farmers in the Pacific Northwest's Klamath Basin. The government has reduced water available for irrigation by about 1,400 California and Oregon farmers there amid a drought and concerns about endangered fish species. The backdrop of the spending bill debate is projected federal surpluses, which while still huge are shrinking because of the slumping economy and the cost of President Bush's recently enacted $1.35 trillion, 10-year tax cut. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., one of the measure's chief authors, said the spending bill's price tag is "not one thin dime above the president's request." That remarks highlighted Democratic efforts to escape White House accusations that excessive congressional spending is why budget surpluses are in peril. "Before the ink is even dry on the president's signature on that tax bill, we may find ourselves headed back into the deficit ditch," Byrd added on the Senate floor, repeating the Democratic charge that the tax cut was too large. But at the White House, Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer pointed his finger back at the Capitol. "The real threat to budget surpluses come from spending," Fleischer told reporters. Both parties agree the surplus in fiscal 2001 - which runs through Sept. 30 - will be close to $200 billion. But most of that is from Social Security, money both parties have pledged to leave alone. Democrats say that thanks to the tax cut and the weaker economy, a $17 billion portion of the remaining surplus that comes from Medicare will be drained. Republicans have denied that. Democrats and many Republicans consider it politically perilous to tap into the Medicare surplus. The Senate bill, covering the remaining months in fiscal 2001, would provide $5.9 billion for the Pentagon and for Energy Department nuclear weapons and defense activities. Included is money for higher than anticipated fuel costs, higher salaries, the military's health care system, repairs to the bomb-damaged USS Cole, and development of the airborne laser and other weapons systems. Other funds include $300 million to help low-income families pay air-conditioning and heating bills, double Bush's request, and $116 million for the Treasury Department's costs of processing the rebates that the tax bill promised millions of taxpayers this year. The bill also includes $84 million to compensate uranium miners and residents who were sickened by radioactivity following Cold War-era nuclear weapons testing in the Southwest. Senators from Kansas, Idaho and Georgia were expected to gain approval of a provision barring the Pentagon from retiring 33 long-range B-1 bombers based in those states. With most senators absent, Monday's slow-moving debate saw Byrd add $3 million aimed at reducing animal cruelty and criticize the man convicted last month for angrily snatching Leo, a small dog, from his owner's car and tossing him into traffic. Byrd called Andrew Burnett "this monster" and added, "It makes one ponder the question, doesn't it, which was the animal, Burnett or Leo." All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 2 ROBERT KENNEDY JR. JAILED FOR VIEQUES PROTEST Environment News Service: AmeriScan: July 9, 2001 AmeriScan: July 9, 2001 SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico, July 9, 2001 (ENS) - Environmental lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been sentenced to 30 days in jail for trespassing during an April protest against U.S. Navy bombing on the Puerto Rican island of Vieques. Kennedy, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council and founder of Riverkeeper, an organization dedicated to revitalizing the Hudson River in New York, traveled to Vieques to participate in protests against the Navy's training exercises on the island. The exercises are blamed for littering the Navy owned portion of Vieques with bomb fragments and unexploded ordinance, and destroying coral reefs in coastal waters. Training was halted in April 1999 after a stray bomb fired by an F-16 fighter killed base security guard David Sanes Rodriquez and injured four other Puerto Ricans. After an agreement was negotiated between former President Bill Clinton and former Puerto Rico Governor Pedro Rossello to hold a referendum regarding whether the training could continue, the Navy resumed exercises on Vieques this spring, though without using live ammunition. Kennedy was among a group of protesters, many from New York State, who trespassed on Navy land in April as part of a demonstration of support for Puerto Rico's opposition to the ongoing exercises. He was sentenced to spend 30 days in jail, as were New York labor leader Dennis Rivera and five other protesters. Norma Burgos, a senator in the Puerto Rican legislature, was sentenced to serve 60 days after arguing to the court that the Navy, not the protesters, should be put on trial. Vieques lies about seven miles southeast of the eastern end of Puerto Rico and is about 20 miles long and four miles wide at its widest point. The U.S. Navy purchased about 22,000 of the island's 33,000 acres for $1.5 million during the 1940s. * * * CALIFORNIA NUCLEAR PLANT TO BOOST POWER OUTPUT SAN CLEMENTE, California, July 9, 2001 (ENS) - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has approved a request by Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas &Electric Company to increase the generating capacity of the two San Onofre nuclear power plants by 1.4 percent, or about 16 megawatts of electricity per unit. The upgrade will help California meet some of its power shortfalls, which have led to several incidents of rolling blackouts during periods of peak energy demand since the beginning of the year. The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is a jointly owned enterprise between Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas &Electric, and the cities of Riverside and Anaheim. SONGS now provides almost 20 percent of the power to more than 15 million people in Southern California - enough power to serve 2.75 million households. The power uprate at the nuclear facility, located near San Clemente, will increase the generating capacity of each unit to about 1,090 megawatts of electricity. The facility intends to implement the power increase early this month, without taking the reactors offline. The application for the increase in power was submitted to the NRC in April. The brief, three month review period by the agency reflects efforts to improve the timeliness of the review process for this type of request. The NRC's safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the units focused on several areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and technical specification changes. Environmental Press Releases ***************************************************************** 3 Fallon jet-fuel line is checked for leaks Today: July 10, 2001 at 10:52:17 PDT By Mary Manning LAS VEGAS SUN A jet-fuel pipeline is being tested in the wake of 14 cases of childhood leukemia diagnosed over the past three years in Fallon. A Houston company, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, owns the fuel line leading into Fallon, a rural community 50 miles east of Reno. The company's vice president, Bill White, said Monday that a portion of the line is being checked for leaks. White said his company has hired Tracer Research Corp. of Tucson, Ariz., to look for leaks or seeps of jet fuel in a 15-mile segment of the 63-mile-long pipe leading into the Fallon Naval Air Station. Jet fuel is a suspect in the 14 cases of leukemia in children ranging in age from 2 to 19 years old. Other suspected causes range from pesticide exposure to radiation and even household products, Nevada health officials have said. Tracer Research crews were injecting a nontoxic, nonradioactive tracer into the gas line late Monday, Pierce said. The test, which poses no danger to the public, can detect very small leaks. It will take about two weeks to complete the test and results are expected at the end of the month. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection approved the inert substance inserted into the pipeline. Kinder Morgan purchased the Fallon pipeline in March 1998. Since then, the company has not discovered any leaks, and a search of past records does not indicate a fuel leak, spokesman Larry Pierce said. "What we are doing is something above and beyond what we normally do for pipeline maintenance," Pierce said. A minor spill did occur at the air station during routine maintenance in December 1998, when jet fuel was being transferred from the pipeline to a truck. About 20 to 40 gallons of the fuel spilled onto the ground. The contaminated soil was removed immediately. All contents copyright 2001 Las Vegas SUN, Inc. ***************************************************************** 4 ORNL's military research role could be on the rise July 9, 2001 By Frank Munger News-Sentinel senior writer Al Trivelpiece, former director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, used to get irritated when people (such as myself) referred to ORNL as a non-defense lab in order to differentiate it from the weapons labs -- Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Sandia. Trivelpiece thought it was inappropriate to define the laboratory by what it isn't. He preferred, as I recollect, that ORNL be called a multipurpose research lab or something like that. Anyway, with that disclaimer out of the way, I now can begin today's column. ORNL is not a defense laboratory, but it does some work for the military. In fact, it would be surprising if that military involvement didn't grow in the years ahead. As the Pentagon talks about revising its strategy for military preparedness, the emerging plan will depend heavily on science and technology. The national laboratories, with ORNL near the forefront, are likely to be important players. The Oak Ridge lab, of course, doesn't design advanced weaponry (at least not that I know of), but it's one of the world's top research centers for advanced materials -- including the strong, lightweight materials that will be required for the battlefields of tomorrow. ORNL has hosted Army brass on a number of occasions in the past few years, shown off the lab's broad-based capabilities and discussed specific projects or collaborations. "It all relates to the Army's transformation program, trying to modernize facilities and equipment," said Dick Davis, a program manager in the lab's national security directorate. "That involves finding a replacement for heavy armored vehicles, like tanks, and going to a much more decentralized, flexible, responsive force that can be moved anywhere in the world via air transport and still be a lethal force." Besides ORNL's work on lightweight ceramic armor, other likely contributions include new-generation fuel cells, telerobotics and advanced sensors to minimize the need for human personnel on the battlefield, and computer modeling and simulation. The Army spends about $6 million annually to co-sponsor some projects at ORNL, but that could ramp up in the years ahead, Davis said. "I certainly think we're helping them with the overall vision of where they're going, making sure they understand the availability of technology and how that impacts everything," he said. * * * About 1,500 people turned out for four "town hall" meetings recently in Oak Ridge to learn about the compensation program for those with illnesses linked to working at the government's nuclear facilities. The U.S. Labor Department, which co-hosted the meetings and which will process the compensation claims, is pretty much an unknown entity in the Atomic City, and there are plenty of questions to be answered. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao initially balked at administering the complicated, high-profile program, which so far seems to have satisfied no one. Still there is some hope that the Department of Labor will be better than the Department of Energy, which is generally distrusted because of its historic role in disputing work-related illnesses. Perhaps the smartest move by Labor was hiring David Michaels, the epidemiologist hired by DOE during the Clinton administration to head the safety and health program and try to forge a relationship with sick workers and the legion of critics. Michaels was unable to deliver help in a timely way, but he listened to the stories of workers and former workers and became their forceful advocate. Not coincidentally, the DOE acknowledged for the first time that the workplace conditions at the federal nuclear facilities made people sick. It's not terribly clear, at this point, what role Michaels will play as the Labor Department sorts through the claims process and attempts to decide who is eligible for $150,000 lump-sum payments and long-term medical care. Officially, Michaels will be a consultant and that could mean anything, a little or a lot. Perhaps, at a minimum, he can contribute a much-needed boost of credibility to the program. The next round of Oak Ridge meetings on the compensation program will be held July 12. The public sessions will begin at 1 and 7 p.m. at the American Museum of Science and Energy, 300 S. Tulane Ave. Senior writer Frank Munger can be reached at 482-9213 or by e-mail at twig1@knoxnews.infi.net. This weekly column on science and technology also is available on our Web site at http://www.knoxnews.com/science/munger/. ***************************************************************** 5 Activists, residents tour weapons facility Web posted Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:13 p.m. By Brandon Haddock Staff Writer Savannah River Site opened its gates Monday to some people concerned about plans for its future. More than 20 activists and interested residents toured the federal nuclear-weapons site to learn more about plans to manufacture plutonium-based nuclear-reactor fuels there. ''Normally, what we hear is from the U.S. Department of Energy's headquarters, and we would like to hear directly from SRS on the ground floor about what's going on with the plutonium-disposition program,'' said Tom Clements, the executive director of the Nuclear Control Institute in Washington. Mr. Clements was an organizer of Monday's tour, which also included representatives from Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Georgians Against Nuclear Energy, Carolina Peace Resource Center, Physicians for Social Responsibility and Alliance for Nuclear Accountability. Cheryl Jay wasn't a member of any of those groups. The Savannah resident came to investigate the site on her own. ''I'm very interested in what's going on at SRS,'' said Ms. Jay, who said she began monitoring the site after it spilled radioactive tritium into the Savannah River in 1991. ''I wanted to come here to get a better grasp of the issues.'' Ms. Jay said she wasn't impressed by plans to build a multibillion-dollar mixed-oxide, or MOX, fuel-fabrication facility at SRS. The plant is intended to rid the nation of at least 36 tons of dangerous weapons-grade plutonium by using it in fuel for nuclear-power plants. But some observers, including Ms. Jay, regard the plan as dangerous and too expensive. ''I think it's kind of a taxpayer ripoff,'' she said. Many of Ms. Jay's fellow site tourists shared her view. ''I'm not against the site or against work being accomplished here,'' said Harry Rogers, the nuclear issues coordinator for the Carolina Peace Resource Center in Columbia. ''They could have gone after responsible missions, but instead went after something that's going to make it worse here.'' The site often gives tours to people who oppose the site or its work, an SRS spokesman said. ''It's always good to hear different perspectives on site operations and activities,'' spokesman Rick Ford said. A botched stop on the tour did little to help the site's case. SRS workers failed to monitor the group for radiation exposure when they left the site's F-Area ''tank farm,'' where highly radioactive liquid waste is stored in underground tanks. The group was checked at the tour's end, and no one tested positive for radioactive contamination. But the incident, which Mr. Clements called ''appalling,'' caused concern among many members of the group. Site officials acknowledged their error. ''It was a mistake in our logistics plan,'' Mr. Ford said. ''We did not intend for them to get off the bus.'' Reach Brandon Haddock at (706) 823-3409 or bhaddock@augustachronicle.com. All contents ©1996 - 2001 The Augusta Chronicle. All rights ***************************************************************** 6 New Zealand DNA testing on servicement NZOOM - ONE News - National New Zealand servicemen are hoping cutting edge DNA testing will prove they have suffered radiation poisoning when witnessing British nuclear tests nearly 50 years ago. Hundreds of Kiwi veterans witnessed nuclear weapons tests in the Pacific and the Australian outback - now, for the first time, their DNA will be examined to see if it helps their compensation case. The vets have been fighting for compensation for years, and hope the outcome of the DNA tests will help their case by proving once and for all their health has suffered from exposure to radiation. Dr Al Rowland, of Massey University's Molecular Biosciences, is one of the scientists conducting the tests. "There is a strong correlation between radiation exposure, genetic damage and ill-health and we are going to do a range of tests to try to gauge any damage that's been done to the veterans," Rowland says. On ONE's Breakfast, Rowland told Liz Gunn that the research will look at any damage done to DNA repair systems. "The research we're doing will have ramifications actually beyond just the veterans. It will extend beyond that to other cancer patients and other radiation workers and the long-term effects as a result of radiation exposure," he says. The vets have been tested before - the difference this time is scientists will be looking at the vets' DNA for damage. Massey University is at the forefront of chromosonal research, but the researchers claim the British government is unhappy about it. "I think they are very scared of what we might find - they've been very antagonistic towards the study," says Sue Rabbitt-Roff of Dundee University, Scotland. But it's been a long time coming for veterans such as Roy Sefton. "It's part of what we've been waiting for and to be honest it's something I never really thought I would see in my lifetime," he says. Some 50 nuclear test vets will be tested against a controlled group of 50 men who did not witness the bombs. The study will take about two years to complete - and may be just what the vets need to finally prove their case against the British government. Jul 09, 2001 ONE News sourced from TVNZ, RNZ, Reuters and ['Bridge'] ***************************************************************** 7 Health package available for radiation sicknesses Explanation of compensation Amarillo Globe-News: Local News: 2001 Amarillo Globe-News By Jim McBride jmcbride@amarillonet.com Pantex's Cold War casualties will stand up and be counted Thursday during a hearing for nuclear workers sickened by radiation or beryllium exposure.

Droves of Pantex workers will attend meetings Thursday when Labor Department officials will explain a new compensation package for sick workers or their survivors. The meetings will be at 1 p.m. and 7 p.m. Thursday at the Amarillo Civic Center.

Last summer, dozens of Pantex workers told of deaths, cancers and other unexplained illnesses they link to working on atomic weapons.

A federal law, passed in October, will provide $150,000 in lump sum compensation and related medical expenses to weapons workers who became seriously ill from exposure to radiation, beryllium or silica.

Compensation also will be available to some survivors who are eligible for benefits under a section of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

Pete Lopez, a 51-year-old production technician, has worked at Pantex for nearly three decades. He now has chronic beryllium disease, an irreversible and sometimes fatal scarring of the lungs.

"For years, we worked on these weapons so our country could be free. Now, we are slaves to these diseases," said Lopez, who often feels a dull pain across his chest, rashes and pain in his joints.

Lopez wants others to attend the meeting and get blood tests for possible beryllium exposure.

"I would like to encourage everybody who has worked at the plant or who works at the plant to get tested because we're talking about a dust," he said.

Lopez said a Denver housewife also has chronic beryllium disease apparently linked to dust from her husband's clothes, which he wore at Colorado's Rocky Flats weapons plant.

David Pompa, a Pantex production technician who works with a Pantex beryllium support group, praised Pantex contractor BWXT for working to speed up beryllium blood-testing programs for workers.

"BWXT comes in and they do it in three months, four months," he said. "We have met with Larrie Trent from BWXT industrial hygiene. He's been very positive in dealing with certain issues that we have concerning beryllium."

Pompa now hopes the federal government will put a Pantex benefits center here to help workers or others claiming benefits. The closest benefits center now is in Espanola, N.M.

"It will be interesting to see how difficult the government will make it for the employee or the claimant to receive that fund," Pompa said. "Some have colon cancer. Some have experienced kidney cancer, thyroid cancer. There are different types of cancer. It's going to be interesting to see how supportive the government will be."

Pompa said five Pantex workers have been diagnosed with chronic beryllium disease and another 21 have tested sensitive to the lightweight metal used in nuclear weapons components.

"If you're sensitive at this time, that means your body hasn't reacted or is not reacting to the beryllium," he said. "But maybe five years from now or 10 years from now, the body will go into the chronic beryllium disease."

Duane Smith, a diesel mechanic who is a Pantex Metal Trades Council safety officer, urged Pantex workers to attend the meeting.

"All current and former employees should attend and participate," Smith said. "There needs to be extensive support not only from those people but also all of the people in Amarillo to get the center here."

He also praised BWXT for working to clean up beryllium dust inside the Pantex Plant.

"The facility cleanup is almost complete," he said. "The cleanup is just like doing a good dust job at your house."

According to information from the DOE, about 1 to 3 percent of all people exposed to beryllium develop chronic beryllium disease. In machinists closely involved in beryllium operations, the number grows to as many as 10 to 14 percent.

***************************************************************** 8 Bush moves to stymie firearm cuts - smh.com.au - World July 10, 2001 By Ewen MacAskill in London A United States delegation to a United Nations conference aimed at reducing the number of small arms has been ordered to block key proposals because President George Bush fears inflaming the gun lobby. The UN conference, which was to open in New York overnight, is aimed at reducing the 500-million world stockpile of Kalashnikovs and other small arms that kill millions of people each year. The US delegation has been ordered to stymie the proposals because Mr Bush is sensitive to the National Rifle Association's insistence that international regulations on small arms may infringe the constitutional right of Americans to bear arms. The NRA heads the US gun lobby, and is one of the most powerful vested interests in the country. Mr Bush's move will anger European Union countries that support the attempt by the UN Secretary-General, Mr Kofi Annan, to reel in the arms trade. A UN document published for the conference blames small arms for 4 million deaths in 46 conflicts since 1990, about 90 per cent of them civilians, and 80 per cent of them women and children. '); document.write(''); document.write('[advertisement]'); document.write(' advertisement '); } } // --> The UN and the EU are pressing for: + A legally binding UN resolution or treaty on the export of small arms; + Proper regulation of arms sales to stem the flow of illegal weapons; + Incentives to encourage destruction of the arms stockpile; + An internationally recognised system for marking weapons so they can be traced back. But the conference looks set to end with empty statements of intent that will not be legally binding. Failure will add to the deterioration in relations between the US and Europe, strained since Mr Bush dumped the Kyoto protocol to reduce carbon emissions and decided to press ahead with the missile defence program. US opposition to the small-arms plan took European and other diplomats by surprise, and earlier optimism about the conference has vanished. Mr Annan, announcing the conference, said curbing the proliferation of small arms was "one of the key challenges in preventing conflict" in the 21st century. A diplomat from one EU country preparing for the summit said there had been a feeling only a few months ago that the world was ready to deal with the proliferation of small arms. "It was a noble ambition to try to disarm or destroy these weapons. I think now it was too much to hope for." Mr Bush will be able to block the gun control plan with ease because there is also opposition from African and Latin American countries. The European diplomat said some African countries were suspicious because the impetus was coming from Europe, and they saw a smack of imperialism about it, and some Latin American countries were hesitant because of their internal security problems. Mr Ed Cairns, a policy adviser with Oxfam, one of the bodies consulted on the proposals, said: "There are only a few days left to prevent this from being a stunning disappointment which won't stop a single person being killed.'' The Guardian ***************************************************************** 9 Road across Rocky Flats studied Rocky Mountain News: Local Highway chief shocks local officials by saying he's still considering Broomfield-Golden link By Berny Morson, News Staff Writer BROOMFIELD -- Jaws dropped among local elected officials Monday as the state highway chief said he is still considering a highway across Rocky Flats. State transportation director Tom Norton said the defunct nuclear weapons plant is among options he'll study for a road linking Broomfield to Golden even though the area is being considered for a wildlife refuge. With support for a wildlife refuge coming from the state's top elected officials in both parties, the local leaders had assumed a road across the plant was dead. "What on earth was that all about?" asked Boulder County Commissioner Paul Danish shortly after the meeting with Norton. Broomfield City Councilman Hank Stovall predicted a "firestorm of criticism" if the highway department recommends a road through Rocky Flats. But Norton said all alternatives should be on the table in deciding how to connect the end of the soon-to-be-built Northwest Parkway in Broomfield with U.S. 6 in Golden. "When you predetermine something, you're not doing a study," Norton said. Excluding a Rocky Flats alternative from such a study will raise questions among federal agencies, Norton warned. "Every time we discard something, we have a major battle with the feds, because someone says, 'Why didn't you consider this?' " Norton said. Norton said he will also consider other alternatives, including one being put forth by Arvada. That route would follow Indiana Avenue along the eastern edge of Rocky Flats, then veer to the west near Leyden to join Colorado 93. Norton said he wants to do the study as soon as possible, but set no date. A panel of local leaders will decide which part of Rocky Flats that the road should be assumed to cross for purposes of the study, Norton said. Soil on some parts of the 6,000-acre site is highly contaminated from years of weapons production. "It's an issue of how much Rocky Flats soil you want to toss up into the air," said Boulder Mayor Will Toor. A bill to make Rocky Flats a wildlife refuge is sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Wayne Allard, a Republican, and in the House by U.S. Rep. Mark Udall, a Democrat. The bill would bar roads within the refuge. Allard spokesman Sean Conway noted that the bill was drafted only after two years of discussions among local elected leaders. Conway said Allard is unlikely to change the bill without the consent of those same leaders. Udall said he was "very disappointed" by Norton's comments. He said numerous transportation studies have been conducted in the area over the years. "A wildlife refuge and a road are mutually exclusive," Udall said. July 10, 2001 2001 © The E.W. Scripps Co. ***************************************************************** 10 Nuclear veterans to be DNA tested news.com.au 10 July 2001 From AP RETIRED New Zealand servicemen exposed to the effects of British nuclear tests in the 1950s will have their DNA examined for possible damage caused by the blasts, a veterans' group said today. The study will check the DNA of 50 test veterans for possible links between the bomb blasts and the poor health suffered by many of the now-retired servicemen, Nuclear Test Veterans' Association chairman Roy Sefton said. The veterans worked on the tests or took part in exercises to determine the effect of fallout on humans or equipment. "This is a hands-on, clinical, definitive approach, completely individualised," Sefton said. He added he had not expected to see such extensive testing "in my lifetime." Sefton said the project's importance was that the results would be specific to the individual. Broader, statistics-based New Zealand studies have been inconclusive about the health effects of the nuclear tests, which were carried out by Britain on Australian territory. Sefton said though the study could add weight to veterans' demands for compensation from the British government, that was not its purpose. The aim was to gain more definitive information about possible genetic damage to test veterans generally, he said. The research, led by Dr Al Rowlands of Massey University's Institute of Molecular Biosciences, will use 100 subjects; 50 test veterans and 50 people who will form a control group. The subjects will provide blood and saliva samples. src="http://www.news.com.au/images/headlines_icon.gif" width="24" Australian IT ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************