***************************************************************** 03/23/07 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 15.69 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 Security UN To Vote Tomorrow On Iran's Nuclear Programme 2 [southnews] UN to vote on new Iran sanctions Saturday 3 Guardian Unlimited: Britain Demands Iran Free Seized Sailors 4 Guardian Unlimited: Iran's President Cancels U.N. Appearance 5 Guardian Unlimited: Sailors fall foul of emerging regional superpowe 6 Reuters: Iran seizes 15 British marines and sailors in Gulf 7 UPI: Iranian president cancels UN trip 8 AFP: US watching fate of British sailors detained by Iran 9 IRNA: White House creates obstacle in visa issuance for Iran preside 10 UPI: Policy Watch: Nukes divide Russia, Iran 11 UPI: N. Korea seeks economic zone near China 12 Korea Times: GNP to Modify Conservative Policy 13 The Hindu: India urges Japan to back Indo-US nuclear deal 14 [du-list] Maybe USUK WMD has sucked up and dispersed all supplies 15 IPS-English UAE: Seminar on GCCs peaceful nuclear programme conclude 16 The Hindu: India dismisses NPT as "fraud" treaty 17 BBC NEWS: Students in glue protest at base 18 UPI: Olmert: I'll do anything for peace 19 UPI: Analysis: NEA, Russia sign nuclear pact NUCLEAR REACTORS 20 allAfrica.com: Namibia: We Want No Chernobyl - Earthlife 21 WNN: Ukraine consolidates its nuclear industry 22 Stuff.co.nz: Academic to argue case for nuclear energy - 23 US: Gristmill: Why the sloppy love for nuclear? 24 US: Rutland Herald: Residents grill Douglas at library 25 US: FR NRC: Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting 26 US: NRC: NRC to Discuss 2006 Performance Assessment for Point Beach 27 US: FR NRC: Virginia Electric and Power Company; Surry Power Station 28 US: UPI: La. regulators hold new nuclear rule 29 US: UPI: Workers vote to strike at Comanche Peak 30 US: UPI: Duke allowed to bill ratepayers for plant 31 US: UPI: Global warming gives nuke power a boost 32 US: News 14 Carolina: Nuclear watchdog group questions safety at She 33 US: Boston Globe: AGs seek NRC rule change on terrorism - 34 Prague Daily Monitor: Czech nuclear plant Temelin opponents to sue i 35 US: Mid Hudson News: Orange County lawmakers consider calling for In 36 AFP: Japan to tighten nuclear rules after near misses - 37 US: Japan Times: Tepco hid 7 1/2-hour criticality accident? 38 Japan Times: Utilities face order to report all reactor mishaps 39 AU ABC : Nuclear power essential to reducing CO2 emissions: physicis NUCLEAR SECURITY 40 US: NRC: Stolen Nuclear Gauge Found in Philadelphia NUCLEAR SAFETY 41 US: Daily Sun: Radioactive water near Hopi springs 42 DAILY YOMIURI : Govt to require power companies to report control ro 43 US: ICT: Western Shoshone integral in stopping Divine Strake detonat NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 44 UN Pushes Ahead With Multinational Enrichment Plan To Prevent Nuclea 45 reviewjournal.com: Porter: Yucca Mountain 'still alive' 46 US: AU ABC: Evans' uranium opposition U-turn 47 US: AU ABC: Carpenter stands tough on no uranium mining policy 48 US: AU ABC: Beattie backs down on uranium mining 49 US: ENS: Public Hearing: First U.S. Mixed Plutonium-Uranium Fuel Pla 50 Las Vegas SUN: Editorial: Beware: Yucca not dead 51 Las Vegas SUN: Q+A: Joe Biden (Yucca) 52 US: BBC NEWS: Australia set for uranium rethink 53 US: Carlsbad Current-Argus: Nuclear expert: Be factual, ethical (GNE 54 US: Ruidoso News: Hearing set on nuclear proposal (GNEP) 55 US: FR NRC: Request for a License To Import Radioactive Waste 56 US: Namibia Economist: Russia pledges to help Namibia develop nuclea 57 NAS: Project: Medical Isotope Production Without Highly Enriched Ura 58 IAEA: Talks Proceed on Proposed International Uranium Enrichment Cen 59 US: AU ABC: Labor's uranium policy set to change 60 US: AU ABC: Public changing view on nuclear, says industry 61 US: AU ABC: Pepininni's to open mine pending scrapping of Labor's ur 62 US: Brandon Sun: Nuclear board orders Cameco to control emissions at 63 US: Ventura County Star: Halaco cleanup could take years 64 US: The Australian: WA Premier 'won't export uranium' 65 US: Herald Sun: Another win for uranium | PEACE US DEPT. OF ENERGY 66 AFP: US energy secretary says pipeline could help Iran build bomb - 67 ContraCostaTimes.com: Program to screen former lab workers 68 Seattle Times: Chemical might keep radiation out of river 69 Tri-City Herald: Hanford proposes landfill expansion 70 Tri-City Herald: Lessons learned on vit plant 71 Platts: House appropriators question DOE's top nonproliferation offi 72 Infoshop News: Nevada Test Site Demonstration 73 lamonitor.com: Water Wars: LANL drills new wells ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 Security UN To Vote Tomorrow On Iran's Nuclear Programme Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:01:23 -0400 SECURITY COUNCIL TO VOTE TOMORROW ON IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAMME New York, Mar 23 2007 8:00PM The Security Council is set to vote tomorrow afternoon regarding possible further sanctions against Iran because of its nuclear programme, the president of the 15-member body said today, adding that the Iranian Foreign Minister will attend the discussions in New York. Ambassador Dumisani S. Kumalo of South Africa, which holds the rotating presidency this month, made his remarks after the Council was briefed by the head of the UN committee monitoring the previous sanctions that were imposed on Tehran in December last year. “The voting is at 3 p.m. The President of Iran is unable to come but the Foreign Minister will be here, arriving tomorrow around midday I’m told… All members of the Council, including South Africa, reiterated our desire to have the Security Council act together and send one message. So we are all working towards this goal,” Ambassador Kumalo told reporters. Iran insists its programme is purely for energy production but other countries maintain it is for making weapons, and three months ago the Council imposed limited sanctions and called on Tehran to suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities. Earlier this month, the UN atomic watchdog agency suspended 22 technical aid projects in Iran in conformity with the sanctions. The decision by the Board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) followed a report by Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei that Tehran had continued uranium enrichment despite the Council’s call that it suspend such activities. In his report Mr. ElBaradei said that because of the lack of “the necessary level of transparency and cooperation” from Iran, the IAEA could not provide assurances that the Iranian programme was solely for peaceful purposes and stressed that the issue was in a class of its own because of Tehran’s 20 years of undeclared activities in breach of its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). It was the discovery in 2003 of Iran’s hidden activities that gave rise to the current dispute and Mr. ElBaradei stressed that “the IAEA’s confidence about the nature of Iran’s programme has been shaken because of two decades of undeclared activities.” Mr. ElBaradei has suggested a “time-out” to allow for talks, with Iran suspending uranium enrichment and the international community suspending sanctions. 2007-03-23 00:00:00.000 ___________________ For more details go to UN News Centre at http://www.un.org/news To listen to news and in-depth programmes from UN Radio go to: http://radio.un.org/ _______________________________ To change your profile or unsubscribe go to: http://www.un.org/apps/news/email/ ***************************************************************** 2 [southnews] UN to vote on new Iran sanctions Saturday Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:16:39 -0500 (CDT) Major powers on Thursday made minor changes to a new Iran sanctions draft resolution and readied the text for a Security Council vote expected to take place Saturday but Tehran remained defiant. UN to vote on new Iran sanctions Saturday; Tehran defiant Friday March 23, 05:56 PM UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - Major powers on Thursday made minor changes to a new Iran sanctions draft resolution and readied the text for a Security Council vote expected to take place Saturday but Tehran remained defiant. The 15-member Security Council met behind closed doors late Thursday to consider changes made to the text agreed last week by the council's five veto-wielding permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany. "Our intention is that there should be a vote Saturday," Britain's UN Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry told reporters after the meeting. "We'll meet tomorrow for one final consideration. But the text is in blue," indicating it is ready for an imminent vote. A Western diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the draft was expected to receive overwhelming support. "The sponsors presented us with a text that took some of the amendments offered by South Africa, Indonesia and Qatar and left out others," said South African Ambassador Dumisani Kumalo, who chairs the council this month. "We are disappointed because we made the amendments in good faith," he added. Kumalo said. "We expected they would give our capitals a chance to look at what they could accommodate ... I don't know what is left for my minister to do." The draft under consideration would ban Tehran from exporting arms, calls for voluntary trade sanctions and expands a list of officials and companies targeted for financial and travel restrictions. It builds on sanctions already adopted by the Security Council in December, including a ban on the sale of nuclear and ballistic missile-related materials to the Islamic republic and a freeze on financial assets of Iranians involved in illicit atomic and ballistic missile work. The sponsors rejected South Africa's suggestions for a 90-day suspension of UN sanctions to allow political negotiations with Tehran and removal of the weapons ban and many of the financial sanctions. A proposal by Indonesia and Qatar to include in the draft a paragraph recalling the goal of a "Middle East free from weapons of mass destruction and all missiles for their delivery" also was dismissed. The sponsors, however, agreed to add language underlining that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN nuclear monitoring agency, "is internationally competent for verifying compliance with safeguards agreements, including the non-diversion od nuclear material for non-peaceful purposes." Their text also restated that an offer of generous economic and diplomatic incentives made by the six powers to Iran last year if it halts uranium enrichment "remains on the table". But Kumalo rejected the changes as "cosmetic." South Africa, which dismantled its nuclear weapons program during its 1990s transition to democracy, has consistently defended Iran's right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. US acting ambassador Alejandro Wolff said: "We embraced amendments that were consistent with the philosophy of the resolution, which is built on a framework of two previous resolutions and those that would enhance its clarity, that would add to its value." Wolff said those amendments "not in keeping with the architecture in place" were rejected. But Tehran showed no sign of compromising. It announced Thursday it had launched naval military exercises, codenamed "Power," in the Gulf to display the Islamic republic's "power and defense capability." "During these maneuvers frigates equipped with missiles, warships, air-to-sea missiles and sea-to-air missiles are being used, as well as tactical reconnaissance submarines," Admiral Sajad Kushaki told state television. "The Iranian people will not allow a single American soldier to set foot on their soil." At UN headquarters, diplomats said Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's intention to attend the Security Council vote on sanctions had no bearing on the timing of the vote. The Iranian leader, who was granted a visa by US authorities, told French television Thursday that the proposed UN sanctions were illegal, adding that he was "not worried" by the prospect of US strikes against his country over the issue. But he also promised to present "new proposals" about Iran's nuclear program, which major powers believe is aimed at producing nuclear weapons. The sanctions draft would give Iran 60 days to comply or face "further appropriate measures," meaning economic sanctions but no military action, under Article 41 of the UN Charter. ***************************************************************** 3 Guardian Unlimited: Britain Demands Iran Free Seized Sailors From the Associated Press Friday March 23, 2007 10:01 PM By JIM KRANE Associated Press Writer DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) - Naval forces of Iran's hardline Revolutionary Guards captured 15 British sailors and marines at gunpoint Friday in the Persian Gulf - an audacious move coming during heightened tensions between the West and Iran. U.S. and British officials said a boarding party from the frigate HMS Cornwall was seized about 10:30 a.m. during a routine inspection of a merchant ship inside Iraqi territorial waters near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway. Iran's Foreign Ministry insisted the Britons were operating in Iranian waters and would be held ``for further investigation,'' Iranian state television said. A U.S. Navy official in Bahrain, Cmdr. Kevin Aandahl, said Iran's Revolutionary Guard naval forces were responsible and had broadcast a brief radio message saying the British party was not harmed. In London, the British government summoned the Iranian ambassador to the Foreign Office, and Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said he ``was left in no doubt that we want them back.'' Iranian TV quoted an Iranian Foreign Ministry official as saying the top British diplomat in Tehran had been called in to receive Tehran's protest of the ``illegal entry'' into Iranian waters. ``This is not the first time that British military personnel during the occupation of Iraq have entered illegally into Iran's territorial waters,'' the unidentified official was quoted as saying. Britain's Defense Ministry said the Royal Navy personnel were ``engaged in routine boarding operations of merchant shipping in Iraqi territorial waters'' and had completed a ship inspection when they were accosted by Iranian vessels. The eight Royal Navy sailors and seven Royal Marines were part of a task force that protects Iraqi oil terminals and maintains security in Iraqi waters under authority of the U.N. Security Council. The Cornwall's commander, Commodore Nick Lambert, said the frigate lost communication with the boarding party, but a helicopter crew saw Iranian naval vessels approach. ``I've got 15 sailors and marines who have been arrested by the Iranians and my immediate concern is their safety,'' he told British Broadcasting Corp. television. Lambert said he hoped it was a ``simple mistake'' stemming from the long dispute between Iraq and Iran over demarcating their territorial waters just off the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab, a waterway that divides the two countries. White House press secretary Tony Snow said the Bush administration was monitoring events. ``The British government is demanding the immediate safe return of the people and equipment and we are keeping watch on the situation,'' Snow said. The incident occurred as the U.N. Security Council debates expanding sanctions against Iran seeking to force Tehran to suspend uranium enrichment. The U.S. and other nations suspect Iran is trying to produce nuclear weapons. Iran denies that and insists it won't halt the program. Iran's leaders also have denied allegations by the U.S., Britain and others that Iranians are arming Shiite Muslim militias in Iraq. Hours before the seizure of the Royal Navy team, British Lt. Col. Justin Maciejewski told BBC Radio 4's ``Today'' program from the Iraqi city of Basra that Iranians provided weapons and money to militants who are attacking British troops in southern Iraq. The U.S. military has leveled similar charges, saying Iranians send arms to Iraqi extremists, including sophisticated roadside bombs. This week, two commanders of an Iraqi Shiite militia told The Associated Press in Baghdad that hundreds of Iraqi Shiites had crossed into Iran for training by the elite Quds force, a branch of Iran's Revolutionary Guard thought to have trained Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon. With tensions running high, the United States has bolstered its naval forces in the Persian Gulf in a show of strength directed at Iran. A strike group led by the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis recently joined a similar force led by the carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower. U.S. officials have expressed concern that with so much military hardware in the Gulf, a small incident like Friday's could escalate into a dangerous confrontation. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, warned this week that if Western countries ``treat us with threats and enforcement of coercion and violence, undoubtedly they must know that the Iranian nation and authorities will use all their capacities to strike enemies that attack.'' The seizure of two Royal Navy inflatable boats took place just outside the mouth of the Shatt al-Arab waterway, a 125-mile channel dividing Iraq from Iran. Its name means Arab Coastline in Arabic, and Iranians call it Arvandrud - Persian for Arvand River. A 1975 treaty recognized the middle of the waterway as the border. Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein canceled the treaty five years later and invaded Iran, triggering an eight-year war. ``It's been in dispute for some time,'' said Aandahl, the U.S. Navy official in Bahrain. ``We've been operating there for a couple of years and we know the lines very well. This was a compliant boarding, this happens routinely. What's out of the ordinary is the Iranian response.'' In June 2004, six British marines and two sailors were seized by Iran in the Shatt al-Arab. They were presented blindfolded on Iranian television and admitted entering Iranian waters illegally, then released unharmed after three days. Vali Nasr, a senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, suggested Friday's detention could be connected to the arrest of five Iranians in a U.S.-led raid in northern Iraq in January. The U.S. said the five included a Revolutionary Guard general. ``I think Iran sees this as retaliation for the arrest of their own personnel. They have repeatedly said that they want their personnel released,'' Nasr said. ``So they are either signaling that they can do the same thing or they are trying to bring attention to it.'' Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 4 Guardian Unlimited: Iran's President Cancels U.N. Appearance From the Associated Press Friday March 23, 2007 9:46 PM By ALEXANDRA OLSON Associated Press Writer UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad canceled a trip to New York to address the U.N. Security Council before it votes on whether to impose further sanctions against his country for refusing to stop enriching uranium, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said Friday. The decision came as diplomats from the five veto-wielding members of the Security Council - the U.S., Britain, France, China and Russia - and Germany held a flurry of last-minute negotiations in New York on a draft resolution seeking to pressure Iran to comply. The six powers want a vote on the resolution by Saturday, but diplomats said that could be delayed by efforts to reach consensus to give the sanctions more weight. The sanctions, agreed on last week by the six powers, would ban Iranian arms exports and freeze the assets of 28 additional individuals and organizations involved in Iran's nuclear and missile programs. About a third of those are linked to the Revolutionary Guard, an elite military corps. Ahmadinejad said earlier this month that he wanted to take his case for pursuing nuclear power to the Security Council himself. Earlier Friday, a council diplomat said the Iranian president would arrive in New York at 1 a.m. Saturday, just hours before the council is expected to meet. But Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Ali Hosseini told Iranian state television later in the day that the trip had been scrapped because of ``America's obstruction in issuing visas'' to the Iranian delegation that was to travel to New York. Hosseini said that instead of Ahmadinejad, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki will attend the Security Council meeting and ``explain Iran's position regarding its nuclear activities.'' ``Due to open failure by the United States to issue visas for members of the Iranian delegation accompanying President Ahmadinejad and the air crew, American authorities have effectively prevented President Ahmadinejad from attending the U.N. security council meeting,'' Hosseini said. Mohammad Mir Ali Mohammadi, press secretary of Iran's mission at the U.N., told The Associated Press that the U.S. did not deliver a visa to the U.S. Embassy in Bern, Switzerland, in time for Ahmadinejad to pick it up before flying to New York for the Saturday session. He said Russia and China were trying to postpone the session until Monday and if the session was put off Ahamdinejad would decide whether to come. Tom Casey, a State Department spokesman, said in Washington that 39 visas had been issued for Ahmadinejad and other Iranian officials and their passports had been returned to Iranian diplomats in Bern by Friday morning. He said another 36 passports with visas were ready later in the day. The U.S. says Iran's nuclear efforts are cover for a weapons program, but Tehran insists it only wants electricity. In December, the Security Council voted unanimously to impose limited sanctions on Iran, ordering all countries to stop supplying Iran with materials and technology that could contribute to its nuclear and missile programs and to freeze assets of 10 key Iranian companies and 12 individuals related to those programs. Iran responded by expanding its enrichment program. Several non-permanent members of the Security Council have resisted the draft resolution, agreed upon last week by the five council powers and Germany. In an effort to overcome their concerns, Russia proposed a compromise Friday over a proposal by Indonesia and Qatar calling for the Middle East to be free of weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. Including such an appeal could have implications for Israel, a U.S. ally widely believed to possess nuclear weapons, though it has never officially acknowledged it. The Russian proposal would include a recognition that ``a solution to the Iranian nuclear issue would contribute global non-proliferation efforts, including those in the Middle East.'' France and Britain approved of the wording, while the United States was considering it, said Axel Crau, a spokesman for France's U.N. mission. ``It's definitely a key point and probably the key to unanimity,'' Crau said. He said the resolution's co-sponsors - France, Germany and Britain - still wanted to call a vote Saturday but may delay it to seek consensus. ``For the sake of unanimity we are willing to make some efforts because unanimity has a value,'' he said. Alejandro Wolff, the acting U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, said the nuclear debate should not be affected by the Iranian seizure of 15 British sailors and marines in the Persian Gulf Friday. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 5 Guardian Unlimited: Sailors fall foul of emerging regional superpower British seamen snatched on eve of UN sanctions vote as resurgent Tehran flexes its muscles across the Middle East Julian Borger and Ian Black Saturday March 24, 2007 The 15 British sailors and marines seized by the Iranian navy yesterday appear to have been well inside Iraqi waters, but they had the ill fortune to stray into the path of the region's aspiring superpower as it flexes new-found muscles. Wherever Britain and its American allies turn these days in the Middle East, they are bumping into the new realities of Iran's spreading influence. Today, the United Nations security council is due to vote in New York on new sanctions against Tehran over its nuclear programme, but there is no sign the Iranians will bow to international pressure and surrender the right to enrich uranium. The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who had been due to address the council before the vote, last night cancelled his trip. A spokesman for the Iranian foreign ministry, Mohammed Ali Hosseini, told Iranian state television it was because of "America's obstruction in issuing visas". In Washington, the State Department insisted it had issued 75 visas for Mr Ahmadinejad's delegation, including air crew and support staff. Iran increasingly appears to be the quartermaster and banker behind the Shia militias keeping British troops pinned down in southern Iraq. In Lebanon, Iran's client Hizbullah holds the key to war or peace, and Tehran is also now a player in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a sponsor of Hamas. The uncomfortable paradox facing London and Washington as they try to put the Iranian genie back in its bottle is that they have done more than anyone to uncork that bottle in the first place and set Iran on the way to regional hegemony. First they removed the Taliban, Iran's enemy to the east, and then they eliminated Saddam Hussein. In little more than a year, the allies ensured Iran achieved its key strategic objective: to become the dominant power in the Gulf and the Middle East. "Getting rid of the Taliban and then getting rid of Saddam, basically gave Iran a free ride in the region," said Mamoun Fandy, senior fellow for Gulf security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. "With the collapse of the Iraqi state, the whole balance of power in the Gulf went out of control, and we moved away from a world of nation states to the world of sectarianism, with Saudi Arabia viewing itself as the centre of gravity of Sunni Islam and by default, Iran became the centre of gravity for Shia Islam." That worsening sectarian divide has given Iran more influence in Arab states with Shia majorities or significant minorities with a history of subjugation to Sunni rulers: in Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. However, that influence in the Arab world transcends the politics of religious identity. For radical Arab Muslims, Tehran is a bastion of defiance to US and British ambitions, and the Iranian nuclear programme is a source of pride. The nuclear programme also owes much to the invasion of Iraq. The intelligence fiasco over Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction has hamstrung US and British-led efforts to galvanise international action against Iran. The sanctions due to be voted on today represent only a very tentative extension of measures passed in December, which Iran ignored. They pose no serious threat to Tehran, but represent the lowest common denominator - the most serious package the Russians would accept. There is talk of military options, but Iran has so far shrugged at such threats. It has seen western military power run into the sand in Iraq. Britain has an almost demonic image in Iran, dating back to the MI6-backed coup against the nationalist prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 and years of British support for the shah, especially in the volatile period before and after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. In the Khomeini era the traditional hostility was encapsulated in the renaming of the road outside the British embassy in Tehran as "Bobby Sands Avenue" after the IRA hunger striker, who to Iranians symbolised resistance to colonial rule. Iranian rhetoric still portrays Britain as the "little Satan" alongside the "Great Satan" that is the United States. It is regularly bracketed, with the US and Israel, as hostile to Iranian interests, and stands accused of fomenting recent bomb attacks in border areas. The two countries' uneasy relationship worsened during the eight-year war with Iraq, when Britain was lambasted for its refusal to supply the arms, ammunition, and spare parts needed by Tehran in its struggle with the "godless Ba'athists of Baghdad". Then came the long crisis over Salman Rushdie, whose novel The Satanic Verses triggered an Iranian "fatwa" permitting him to be killed as an apostate. The author had to live under special branch guard until 1998 when liberalisation in Tehran and the efforts of the late foreign secretary, Robin Cook, brought a negotiated end to the affair. With the external shackles on Iran's rise removed, its geopolitical ambitions may still be limited by its internal problems. Even the relatively weak UN sanctions appear to have deepened fault lines between the competing centres of power in Tehran, with increasingly tension between President Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The seizure of British sailors may be an attempt by one faction to force the hand of another. In Iraq generally, the Iranian leadership must also be careful not to follow the US-British example - and overreach. Countdown to confrontation 2003 March US invades Iraq and overthrows Saddam Hussein, shuns offer of broad dialogue with Iran. September UN nuclear watchdog, IAEA, tells Tehran to prove it is not pursuing atomic weapons programme. November Iran suspends uranium enrichment and permits tougher UN nuclear inspections. IAEA says no evidence of a weapons programme. 2004 February Conservatives gain control of majlis. November Iran agrees to suspend most uranium enrichment under EU deal. June Hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, wins presidential elections. 2005 August-September Uranium conversion resumes at Isfahan. Tehran insists purposes peaceful. October Ahmadinejad says "regime occupying Jerusalem must [vanish from] the page of time" 2006 January Iran breaks IAEA seals at Natanz nuclear research facility. February IAEA votes to report Iran to the UN security council. Iran resumes uranium enrichment. August UN deadline for Iran to halt work on nuclear fuel passes. 2007 February IAEA says Iran has missed deadline to suspend uranium enrichment, exposing Tehran to possible new sanctions. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 6 Reuters: Iran seizes 15 British marines and sailors in Gulf Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:34PM EDT By Aref Mohammed BASRA, Iraq (Reuters) - Iranian forces seized 15 British servicemen on Friday in the mouth of the waterway that separates Iran and Iraq, triggering a diplomatic crisis at a time of heightened tensions over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Britain said two boatloads of sailors and marines had searched a cargo ship in Iraqi waters on a U.N. approved mission when Iranian gunboats encircled and captured them. No shots were fired and the British servicemen were unharmed, officials said. Iran accused the British of illegally entering its waters. The incident came as U.N. Security Council members were putting the final touches to a resolution imposing new sanctions on Iran over its refusal to halt sensitive nuclear work. A vote on the resolution could take place as early as Saturday. Oil prices rose more than one percent to a three-month high on the news of the Britons' seizure. Britain summoned Iran's ambassador in London and demanded the servicemen's immediate release. "We sought a full explanation of what happened and left the Iranian authorities in no doubt that we expect immediate and safe return of our service personnel and boats," foreign minister Margaret Beckett said. Continued... © Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 7 UPI: Iranian president cancels UN trip United Press International - NewsTrack - Published: March 23, 2007 at 5:55 PM TEHRAN, March 23 (UPI) -- Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad canceled a visit to the United Nations Friday, blaming the United States for delaying visa approval. Ahmadinejad planned to address the U.N. Security Council before a Saturday vote on sanctions against Iran because of its nuclear program. He said that the crew of his plane were not granted visas in time for him to make the trip, CNN reported. Earlier, the State Department said that visas for the president and his entourage were ready in Bern, Switzerland. Iranian officials said that the country will try to get its foreign minister to the United Nations for the meeting. Ahmadinejad promised to present "new proposals" to end the standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment program, Alalam reported Friday. Deputy foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had said U.S. officials appeared to be creating problems to prevent Ahmadinejad from speaking to the U.N. to "clarify facts and positions" about the Iranian nuclear dispute. He called it "some kind of a hostile policy," the Fars News Agency said. Security Council members were to meet Friday to review a revised draft of a resolution to impose additional sanctions on Iran for its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, IRNA, the Islamic Republic News Agency, reported. © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 8 AFP: US watching fate of British sailors detained by Iran Fri Mar 23, 5:15 PM ET WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States Friday called for the release of a group of British sailors held by Iran saying they had been carrying out "routine" inspections in Iraqi waters. "They were engaged in routine boarding operations of merchant shipping in Iraqi territorial waters," said White House spokesman Tony Snow. "We're keeping watch on the situation." Snow said the sailors "were moved into Iranian waters" and, when asked how the United States was responding, stressed "at this point, what we're doing is staying in touch with the Brits." US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called for the group to be released, as she was about to leave on a trip to the Middle East. "We have talked to our British colleagues. We've offered to help in any way we can. But I really don't think it helps to comment on it," she said. "They need to be released, and that I think is what everyone's focussed on." Iran said it had seized a group of British sailors on Friday after they illegally entered its waters, threatening a full-blown crisis in already tense relations between the West and Tehran. "British charge d'affaires Kate Smith was summoned to the foreign ministry to receive a firm protest from Iran against the illegal entry of British sailors into Iranian territorial waters," said a statement from Ibrahim Rahimpour, Iranian director general for Western European affairs. Rahimpour demanded an "immediate explanation from London over the violation of its territorial waters and insisted that this not happen again," his statement said. Britain's Ministry of Defense said 15 sailors were seized by Iranian naval vessels in the Gulf on Friday. It demanded their immediate release and sought urgent clarification from Tehran. Following their capture, Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett summoned the Iranian ambassador for what were described as "brisk but polite" talks. The abduction of the British servicemen came as the United Nations Security Council prepared to vote on new sanctions aimed at forcing Tehran to curb its nuclear program. The United States has issued visas to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his entourage to enable them to travel to New York for vote on sanctions expected on Saturday. But an Iranian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the visas were issued too late by the US and "because of this, it is not possible to get the visa to Tehran on time, and the president's trip has therefore become virtually impossible." Copyright © 2007 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 9 IRNA: White House creates obstacle in visa issuance for Iran president Tehran, March 23, IRNA Iran-US-President The White House has created obstacle in issuing visa for Iranian president to take part in the meeting of the Security Council. President mahmoud Ahmadinejad decided to go to New York to defend Iranian right at the Security Council debate on Iranian nuclear program on Saturday. Deputy Foreign Minister for International and Legal Affairs Abbas Araghchi expressed regret at absence of cooperation on part of the US Administration for issuing visa for the Iranian president. "Despite completing application formality for the visa and the US Administration officials promises to grant visa at the earliest possible time, the visa is not available for the time being. It should have been issued sometime ago," he said. "It seems the US Administration is following its unilateral approach by visa refusal for the Iranian president. It is blatant violation of the consular undertaking of the UN host country in dealing with visa requests for officials of the United Nations Member States and another indication of the US ill-intention toward Iranian nuclear program." ***************************************************************** 10 UPI: Policy Watch: Nukes divide Russia, Iran United Press International - Intl. Intelligence - 3/23/2007 3:18:00 PM -0400 By MARK N. KATZ WASHINGTON, March 23 (UPI) -- While long perceived in Washington as friends, Russia and Iran clearly do not regard each other as such at present. The Russian Atomic Energy Organization, after many years of delay, has almost finished work on the nuclear reactor Moscow is building for Iran at Bushehr, and was supposed to start supplying the enriched uranium for it to run on. Moscow, though, has stopped work on the reactor and said it will not deliver the fuel because Tehran has stopped making payments owed to Russia. Tehran hotly denies this, claiming that it has paid Moscow everything it is due. Underlying this dispute is the increasing Russian fear that Iran might well use the atomic energy capacity Moscow is building for it to acquire nuclear weapons. On March 18, Interfax quoted Russian Security Council Secretary Igor Ivanov as stating that Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons "would be a threat to Russia's interests," and that "we are doing everything to prevent this." The New York Times reported on March 19 that Moscow has informed Tehran it will not deliver the fuel for Iran's nuclear reactor unless Iran suspends its uranium enrichment program which many fear it will use to develop weapons grade material. The Bush administration has reportedly encouraged a tougher Russian stance on the Iranian nuclear issue by supporting a plan for Iran's uranium to be enriched in Russia. This would both provide profits to Russia as well as ensure that Iran's uranium would only be enriched to the lower level needed for an atomic energy reactor and not to the higher level required for a weapon. Up to now, though, Tehran has insisted upon enriching at least some uranium inside Iran. It is not yet clear whether Iran will back down and agree to Russia enriching all its uranium, or if Russia will indeed refuse to deliver the fuel needed for the Bushehr reactor if Iran does not. Washington would be happy with either outcome. Instead of improving Russian-American relations, though, either outcome could sow the seeds of further misunderstanding between Moscow and Washington. This is because the two sides have very different expectations from each other. If Moscow gets Tehran to agree to Russia enriching all it uranium -- and even more so if Tehran does not agree and Moscow follows through on its threat not to deliver fuel for Iran's nuclear reactor -- Moscow will expect significant compensation from Washington. Washington, by contrast, has long seen the Iranian atomic energy program as something Moscow should not have been supporting in the first place. It should not be necessary, in the American view, to compensate someone for halting or reversing an action that is harmful not just to others, but even to itself. It is not, of course, just Russian support for the Iranian nuclear program that Moscow and Washington have had this difference of opinion over. Indeed, this difference in outlook has existed ever since the end of the Cold War. Moscow, for example, thought it was due major compensation from America and the West for allowing the downfall of communism in Eastern Europe and withdrawing its armed forces from there. America and the West, by contrast, saw both the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet military presence in these countries as illegitimate to begin with, and thus not deserving significant compensation. There have been similar differences between Moscow and Washington since then over many other issues. It is highly likely, then, that Moscow will see itself entitled to significant compensation from Washington for not delivering fuel for the Iranian nuclear reactor if Tehran refuses to freeze its nuclear enrichment program. At the same time, Washington will see preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons as being as beneficial to Russia as to all other countries, and therefore will not be willing to make significant concessions to get Moscow to stop hurting its own interests by helping the Iranian nuclear program. Thus, even if Russia ends up not supplying fuel for Iran's nuclear reactor, Russian-American relations are not likely to improve. (Mark N. Katz is a professor of government and politics at George Mason University.) © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights ***************************************************************** 11 UPI: N. Korea seeks economic zone near China United Press International - International Intelligence - Published: March 23, 2007 at 7:34 AM SEOUL, March 23 (UPI) -- North Korea is seeking to establish a special economic zone on islands bordering China, Seoul news reports said Friday. The communist North has been pushing to set up a free trade zone on the Bidan and Wihwa islands on the Yalu River on the western border between North Korea and China, according to Yonhap News Agency. "The North has been mulling building the zone since early last year but hasn't made headway in the wake of its nuclear test (in October last year)," a South Korean source was quoted as saying. Pyongyang hopes to use the proposed economic zone to win China's investments and help resuscitate the North's moribund economy, it said. The North has also sounded out South Korean companies on their investment plans for the project, it added. © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 12 Korea Times: GNP to Modify Conservative Policy Hankooki.com > The Korea Times By Jung Sung-ki Staff Reporter The main opposition Grand National Party (GNP) is seeking to change its conservative stance toward North Korea. The party held a series of informal meetings to modify its party platforms in a way that would have been unthinkable just months ago. It has yet to formalize its revision of policy but is moving to support the transition of wartime operational control from the United States to South Korea in 2012 as part of its softening stance on North Korea, party officials said. Political pundits hold such a move is construed to win more public support in the December presidential election in line with the seemingly thawing inter-Korean relations after a landmark nuclear disarmament deal reached on Feb. 13. In addition, the party is debating whether to recognize North Korea as a sovereign state and make efforts to establish cross-border diplomatic missions, the officials said. The GNP has opposed the command transfer agreement struck late last month between the two governments, citing threats posed by North Korea's nuclear and missile programs. GNP presidential hopefuls also pledged to review the pact regarding command rearrangements if they win the presidential election. In talks between defense ministers in Washington, D.C., the two nations agreed that the Korean military will assume operational control of its troops during wartime from April 17, 2012, ending more than 62 years of U.S. control that began shortly after the outbreak of the 1950-53 Korean War. An eight-member task force of the GNP is set to unveil a package of new North Korean policies focused on engagement and cross-border exchanges, officials said. But it remains unclear whether the softened polices will be finally formalized as the party platform because hawks in the party and pro-GNP conservative civic groups have opposed the radical change in North Korean policies. ``The envisaged North Korean policies will set out a clear vision and goal of achieving inter-Korean reunification. We believe the people will understand the sincerity of the new policies,'' Rep. Song Young-sun, a member of the North Korean task force, told the Munhwa Ilbo. The new North Korean approaches will include measures to provide North Koreans with houses if the Pyongyang government approves and establishes a peaceful regime on the peninsula to replace the armistice, according to party officials. Increase in humanitarian assistance to the North and inter-Korean economic projects are under consideration. However, humanitarian aid will not include cash or other materials that may be used by the military. gallantjung@koreatimes.co.kr 03-23-2007 17:47 ***************************************************************** 13 The Hindu: India urges Japan to back Indo-US nuclear deal Friday, March 23, 2007 : 1640 Hrs Tokyo, March. 23 (PTI): Making a strong pitch to secure the support of a reluctant Japan for the Indo-US nuclear deal, India today said Tokyo must take on board its 'impeccable" record on non-proliferation. A day after the contours of a resurgent strategic partnership between India and Japan took shape, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee said Tokyo must "discern" what is behind New Delhi's quest for international civilian nuclear energy cooperation. "I am very conscious of the sentiments of the Japanese people on nuclear matters. However, I also trust in your wisdom to discern what lies at the heart of our efforts to secure stable energy supplies," Mukherjee said. Japan is yet to extend support to the landmark nuclear deal. "India has an impeccable record on non-proliferation," he said, speaking on the 'Significance of India-Japan Relations' here at the Japan Institute of International Affairs, a major think-tank. Mukherjee and his Japanese counterpart Taro Aso earlier concluded the first Ministerial level strategic dialogue between the two countries. "We have also consistently been a leading advocate of the elimination of all nuclear weapons. I believe that Japanese are aware of India's adherence to the values of peace and non-violence. I am confident we will find common ground that balances our mutual interests and advances our cooperation and collaboration in this area too," he said. Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the ***************************************************************** 14 [du-list] Maybe USUK WMD has sucked up and dispersed all supplies Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:08:35 -0800 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [du-list] Maybe USUK WMD has sucked up and dispersed all supplies Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:42:54 +1200 From: David Broatch Reply-To: du-list@yahoogroups.com To: Fuel shortage limits U.S. nuke power plans http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Science/20070321-074635-5559r/ "nearly depleted (sic ) and uranium production meets only about 65 percent of reactor requirements. Can we re-harvest this from Iraq with mutated tumbleweed or extract from veg. and DU aborted victim ashes? Is this reliance on a "technological" solution akin to "faith" and making room for Xtian Cult Nukers and the great profit promoters? just asking. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Visit Your Group Top Scientist 10 Greatest Ever Share and vote on Bix.com! Yahoo! News World News Get the latest world news now Market Online Drive traffic to your web site with Sponsored Search. . __,_._,___ ***************************************************************** 15 IPS-English UAE: Seminar on GCCs peaceful nuclear programme concludes Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:42:55 -0800 From: WAM Service UAE: Seminar on GCC’s peaceful nuclear programme concludes Att.Editors: The following item is from the Emirates News Agency (WAM) ABU DHABI, Mar. 23 (WAM) - The United Arab Emirates (UAE) Institute of Diplomacy concluded yesterday a seminar on the potential joint peaceful nuclear energy programme of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states. Topics covered by the seminar included the reality and strategies of using nuclear power for generating electricity, global warming, greenhouse gases and components of nuclear reactors. Participants in the seminar included UAE Foreign Ministry diplomats and officials from other UAE governmental departments. The seminar is part of a series of seminars and symposiums by the institute to introduce peaceful nuclear energy programmes that are compliant with international standards and regulations as well as effects and demands of nuclear programmes, said Director General of the Institute of Diplomacy. (WAM) (WAM) ***************************************************************** 16 The Hindu: India dismisses NPT as "fraud" treaty Friday, March 23, 2007 : 1340 Hrs Tokyo, March 23 (PTI): While seeking Japanese support for the historic Indo-US civilian nuclear energy deal, India today dismissed the NPT as a "fraud" treaty. "I am very conscious of the sentiments of the Japanese people on nuclear matters," External Affairs Minister, Pranab Mukherjee said while speaking at the Japan Institute of International Affairs here. "However, I also trust in your wisdom to discern what lies at the heart of our efforts to secure stable energy supplies," he said while speaking on the 'Significance of India-Japan Relations.' "I am confident we will find common ground that balances our mutual interests and advances our cooperation and collaboration in this area too," Mukherjee told Japanese scholars, a day after discussing these issues with his Japanese counterpart, Taro Aso and other ministers. Mukherjee touched upon the topic of India's civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States, an issue which is being hotly debated within the academic circles in Japan. "India has an impeccable record on non-proliferation. We have also consistently been a leading advocate of the elimination of all nuclear weapons. I believe that Japanese are aware of India's adherence to the values of peace and non-violence," he said. "If India did not sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), it is not because of its lack of commitment for non-proliferation, but because we consider NPT as a fraud treaty and it did not recognise the need for universal, non-discriminatory verification and treatment," Mukherjee said. Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the ***************************************************************** 17 BBC NEWS: Students in glue protest at base Last Updated: Friday, 23 March 2007, 11:18 GMT Campaigners glued themselves together outside the base Peace campaigners from West Yorkshire glued themselves together and blockaded an entrance to the Faslane nuclear submarine base in Scotland on Friday. The students from Bradford and Leeds universities and a lecturer went to the base after the government voted to renew the UK's Trident system. Rev Chris Howson, an Anglican priest connected with the group, said the campaigners had been arrested. Speaking in Bradford on Friday Mr Howson said: "When we heard on Wednesday that the government had voted to renew and upgrade nuclear weapons we thought that was such a stupid move we thought we'd do something equally stupid." The MoD spokeswoman said 10 people had blocked the north gate at the base and another four were in the process of blocking the south gate when they were arrested. "Because of the closure of the north gate there was disruption to traffic leaving and entering the base, however the MoD police were quickly on the scene to remove the protesters and this did not affect the normal operation of the base." * BBC Copyright Notice ***************************************************************** 18 UPI: Olmert: I'll do anything for peace United Press International - NewsTrack - Published: March 22, 2007 at 5:10 PM TEL AVIV, Israel, March 22 (UPI) -- Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert says Israel is ready to make extensive, painful and tough concessions to achieve a dialogue with its enemies. Olmert told an audience in Tel Aviv Thursday the Saudi Arabian-backed peace plan could provide the basis for negotiations but Israel opposes right-of-return for Palestinian refugees, Voice of America reported. The Saudi plan is expected to come up next week at the Arab summit in Riyadh. It calls for Arab states to recognize Israel in exchange for an Israeli withdrawal to 1967 borders. "This government will not miss an opportunity to dialogue with its enemies and will do anything possible ... to push this process forward," Olmert said, Arutz Sheva reported. © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 19 UPI: Analysis: NEA, Russia sign nuclear pact United Press International - Energy - 3/22/2007 9:43:00 PM -0400 By BEN LANDO UPI Energy Correspondent WASHINGTON, March 22 (UPI) -- The Nuclear Energy Agency and Russia have signed a deal improving cooperation in the nuclear field. The head of the NEA, a program of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, told United Press International this enhanced bond will allow both Russia and NEA members to improve their nuclear programs, and create a better nuclear power sector worldwide. "Russia is going to get to grasp immediately the experience of the rest of the countries which have nuclear, with all the background that we have developed during the last years," NEA Director General Luis Echavarri said Wednesday from Moscow in an interview over his mobile phone following the signing of the joint declaration with Konstantin Pulikovsky, chairman of Russia's Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service. "And the countries in the OECD are going to benefit from having another supplier of high quality goods and services," Echavarri said. "It is very, very important agreement, because this opens practically everything in the NEA to the Russian Federation. And the Russian Federation is a country which has a very important nuclear program, they export their nuclear technology, they have a complete nuclear fuel cycle, so it is a partner we've been looking for for a long time." Twenty-eight OECD countries make up the Paris-based NEA and they its nearly $16 million annual budget, since some OECD states are opposed to nuclear. Although it cooperates with the International Atomic Energy Agency, as well as the European Commission and International Energy Agency, the NEA rounds up nuclear expertise, research and technology to develop members' nuclear sectors. The deal means Russia will have official observer status in NEA's seven standing technical committees as well as their working groups. In the past, Russia was involved in NEA's focus on increasing the safety of nuclear power. "However, there are areas in which they were very absent," Echavarri said. "For example, in waste. It's very important that the Russian Federation knows how the OECD countries deal with, especially high level, waste. And we want to know what plans they have and (how) they're going to do it." Russia operates 31 nuclear reactors and plans to increase nuclear power from the current 15.8 percent of the nation's electricity demand to 25 percent by 2030, including bringing 40 new reactors online. It also has an active nuclear export arm, Atomstroyexport, building reactors in Iran, India, China, with plans to build more in those countries as well as Ukraine, Bulgaria and Kazakhstan. And Moscow is leading a push to create international nuclear fuel centers to both process fuel and recycle waste. "I think that for them instead of having sometimes some bilateral discussions with some countries, they are going to have just in one spot the best specialists for the OECD countries in every field," Echavarri said. "This is going to facilitate for them access to the way in which the OECD countries operate. This is very important for them and they recognize it, because they want to have access to more markets for nuclear technologies and the customers there demand the very high quality. So they are very attracted to know how the OECD countries deal with that." The cooperation of these 29 countries will not only bolster their respective nuclear programs, Echavarri said, but create a better market for nuclear energy worldwide. "This is very important because the nuclear energy for the future, if you want nuclear energy to be an important part of energy, it has to be competitive," Echavarri said. "We have to have different vendors and different suppliers of services competing. And competing not only in price, of course, but competing in quality, competing in performance, competing in services to the customer. "So it is very welcome that in some years the Russian Federation could be one more of the club of countries which put products in global, high quality markets." -- © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 20 allAfrica.com: Namibia: We Want No Chernobyl - Earthlife The Namibian (Windhoek) March 23, 2007 Brigitte Weidlich PLANS by the Russian government to build a series of "small nuclear power plants" in Namibia, as disclosed by Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov last week while on a blitz visit to Windhoek, has given rise to strong opposition from environmentalists. The group Earthlife Namibia says it strongly opposes nuclear power generation in Namibia. "It would be far too dangerous and would put coming generations into serious jeopardy," says Bertchen Kohrs, Chairperson of Earthlife Namibia. "Although South Africa will reduce power supply to Namibia very soon, the production of nuclear power is not an acceptable solution for energy supply. Namibia has got much better, safer and sustainable options like solar and wind power," Kohrs says. Since nuclear power generation requires extremely high technological capacity and skills, it is extremely doubtful if Namibia would be in a position to mobilise manpower to operate and maintain a nuclear power plant, Kohrs said in a statement this week. "Namibia can deal with the technology of renewable energy and a good example is the generation of solar power at the Training and Research Centre at Gobabeb in the Namib Desert. But technology for a nuclear power plant is a completely different story," according to Earthlife. "How would Namibia deal with a nuclear accident? The past shows that nuclear accidents are a combination of human error and technological breakdown. The most horrific nuclear catastrophe happened 20 years ago at the Chernobyl nuclear reactor in the Ukraine," Kohrs added. Innocent babies born today, 20 years after the accident, still paid tribute to the nuclear disaster, born with terrible deformities and having little chance of survival. It was difficult to understand why Namibia should be the recipient of questionable nuclear technology from Russia and even from China, Earthlife Namibia argued. "Both countries, Russia and China, are known for sloppy maintenance and both have a long history of bad environmental and social behaviour. It is doubtful this has changed or if Russia learnt from the Chernobyl disaster," the organisation stated. "Can today's decision makers in Namibia guarantee that this will not happen to our daughters and sons?" Kohrs asked. "We urge you to think beyond short-term benefit and be true leaders bringing sustainable development to this region." Namibia, with its great capacity of almost 350 days of sunshine a year, could be a world leader in renewable energy. Earthlife Namibia urged Government to consider all opportunities and weigh the positive and negative consequences of each option. According to Russian media, that country wants to build 42 nuclear plants at home and 60 more in other countries over the next few years - offering the technology, but wanting secure uranium supplies in return, like from Namibia, one of the top five uranium producers. Unbeknownst to local media or the Namibian public, a meeting of a hitherto unknown organisation, the Russian-Namibian Intergovernmental Commission (IC) took place in Windhoek last July. The holding company of Bank Windhoek, Capricorn Investments, quietly signed a shareholders agreement with the Russian Vneshtorgbank (VTB) to establish a joint venture called VTB Capital Namibia. Under the agreement, Vneshtorgbank's capital share in the new company is 50 per cent plus 2 shares - thus the majority. None other than Yuri Trutnev, Minister of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation, and Education Minister Nangolo Mbumba attended the signing ceremony, The Namibian has reliably learnt. Oleg Muradyan, Senior Vice President of VTB, signed on behalf of the Russian bank and Koos Brandt for Capricorn. The main purpose of the new company supposedly is to invite Russian business and investment to Namibian markets and sub-Saharan Africa in order to implement "interesting and promising projects in the region", including international financing of the projects, VTB says on its website. Relevant Links Southern Africa Namibia Environment Europe and Africa Energy "Russian companies are interested in business development in southern Africa, extraction and processing of natural resources, energy, telecommunications, fishing, construction and trade," the website states. Prices for uranium oxide, also known as yellow cake, have nearly doubled over the last seven months. Copyright © 2007 The Namibian. All rights reserved. Distributed by ***************************************************************** 21 WNN: Ukraine consolidates its nuclear industry World Nuclear News 22 March 2007 Ukrainian politicians have approved a statute for an integrated state nuclear company called the 'State Concern Ukratomprom'. It will be headed up by Andriy Derkach, current President of Energoatom, the state nuclear utility upon which Ukratomprom will be built. The reactor building of Energoatom's Rovno 4 (Image: Energoatom) The aim of creating an integrated enterprise unifying companies and organizations that serve the Ukrainian nuclear industry is to attract investment into modernization of the industry's mining, machine building, design and research sectors, and to facilitate the development of the national nuclear fuel cycle. According to the cabinet's decree from 14 March, Energoatom will not gain control over the current activities of the unified enterprises at this stage. Instead, Energoatom will act as the representative of the new Ukratomprom in matters of the contractual agreements between its component parts and external affairs with government, industrial partners, investors and other stakeholders. Ukratomprom will consist of the major nuclear related establishments in Ukraine: * Nuclear power producer Energoatom, which owns and operates 15 reactors with a total capacity of about 13,800 MWe * Uranium mining company VostGOK * The company created to mine the Novokonstantinovskiy uranium deposit * Turboatom, the main turbine producer of turbines for nuclear power plants in the former Soviet Union * The Smoly state enterprise * The Research Institute of the Industrial Technologies * The Dnepropetrovsk zirconium tube production plant Ukratomprom was tasked, over the next three months, with drafting a policy of nuclear fuel cycle development up to 2030 which will be presented for the analysis and approval of the cabinet. Further information Energoatom Turboatom WNA's Nuclear Power in Ukraine information paper ***************************************************************** 22 Stuff.co.nz: Academic to argue case for nuclear energy - New Zealand Saturday, 24 Mar 2007 New Zealand's reliance on hydro and geothermal energy sources could be short-sighted in the face of climate change, says a European energy expert. "Nuclear power on its own will not solve the problem of global warming ? but the problem of global warming will not be solved unless nuclear power is in the equation," said Terry Wynn, a former member of the European Parliament. The visiting European-in-Residence at Auckland University 's recently-created Europe Institute, Mr Wynn plans a public lecture at the university on Monday on the pros and cons of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is one of the cleanest and most efficient power sources availabe and the world needs to "go nuclear" according to Mr Wynn, who will set out the reasons he considers nuclear power crucial to winning the fight against global warming. "While New Zealand is fortunate to have so much hydro and thermal energy, alternatives must be considered to cope with what happens when these resources run out," he said. Last year, one of the nation's leading electricity companies, Genesis, said New Zealand needed to seriously look at using a nuclear power plant to generate electricity with low greenhouse gas emissions. "If the country at large does not get on board with nuclear technology, then when fusion reactors are available we will be so far behind the pace we won't have the research department ready to understand it," said Genesis chief executive Murray Jackson. But Energy Minister David Parker said at the time that nuclear energy, quite apart from its environmental problems, would be too expensive for New Zealand. "The implication of that would be a very substantial rise in electricity prices." Mr Parker also said nuclear fusion to produce energy was still a dream: "We have lots of choices which are technically feasible and cheaper." Email a Friend | Printable View | Have Your Say Next Story: Fired for painting student's car - More National News Stories © Fairfax New Zealand Limited 2007. ***************************************************************** 23 Gristmill: Why the sloppy love for nuclear? The environmental news blog | Grist Posted by John McGrath at 2:38 PM on 22 Mar 2007 During his marathon live-blogging yesterday, David "Boss-man" Roberts wrote about the GOP love of nuclear power: "Why are Republicans obsessed with this? It's mystifying. Don't they have anything else to talk about?" Well, they love clean coal too. The question to me has always been why alleged conservatives have so much time for nuclear when it doesn't align with one of their cherished principles: If "big-government nanny-state market interference" had a poster child, the cooling towers of a nuclear plant would be it. This is, after all, an industry that still traces it's lineage to the military-industrial complex. Created by the exigencies of war in a style of command economy that the United States didn't see again until the Apollo Program, the first atomic weapons in fact cost multiples more than landing a man on the moon. Later, as the U.S. Navy shifted to nuclear power and the arms races of the Cold War gathered steam, the military remained the dominant consumer of nuclear materials. Globally, military uses of uranium were not exceeded by civilian uses until the mid-1970s. The mid-1970s were, as it turned out, the last best hope for a major nuclear expansion. With unprecedented spikes in the price of oil, France (as any nuclear advocate will endlessly tell you) embarked on a major expansion of its nuclear industry. How did France do this? With yet more nanny-state intervention, of course! Reactors were designed by the state, financed by the state, built by the state, and operated by the state. Permanent waste sites are similarly built and run by the state. In the U.S., the story is similar but with some quirks. Often called the biggest single subsidy for the nuclear electric industry, the U.S. government insures every reactor built in the U.S. with taxpayers' money. (No private insurer will ever, ever risk a nuclear investment.) The companies that make civilian reactors also just happen to be able to rely on contracts from the U.S. Navy, which powers all its large ships with nuclear reactors. And now we have Yucca Mountain, a long-term (and I mean long-term!) storage site for nuclear waste being built at taxpayers' expense in a location chosen for political expediency, not safety, efficiency, or even market logic. (Nevada apparently didn't have the sway in Congress to dump in another state.) The sad truth (for the nuclear industry, at least) is that there's very little sign of change. The safer and more efficient reactors are even more obscenely expensive than current models (some $10,000 per kilowatt for prototype pebble-bed reactors, compared to a historic $4,000 for conventional models) and the nuclear industry cannot afford to finance its own insurance and waste disposal -- not without pricing its kilowatt-hours right out of the market. All the same ... if, in the 1970s -- the time of the earliest warnings about climate change -- you had asked me to sign up for the French program, I probably would have supported it. (We'll ignore the fact that such a program might not have survived the Reagan Revolution in America, or the War on Deficit that followed.) Except -- and I don't know why this isn't obvious -- we don't live in the 1970s. Check it out -- it's 2007, there's not a bell-bottom to be seen, and we've got different and better options. Efficiency is cheaper than coal or natural gas. Wind is cheaper than nuclear. (And in some countries, wind is already generating more power than nuclear! Viva!) By the mid 20teens, solar electricity will be cheaper throughout most of America than nuclear, and by 2020 it may be cheaper even in places like Syracuse, N.Y. Storage technologies will make renewables increasingly competitive with base load generation. (Consider what we'd rather Washington spend money on: storing radioactive waste, or storing heat and kilowatt-hours?) More efficient long-distance transmission will make the Midwest the new Middle East of energy. This could all be possible about the same time a nuclear reactor would come online, if we started building it yesterday. Most of the renewable options are possible without government interference of anything like the same magnitude nuclear receives every hour of every day. Some will be possible without government interference at all, but I'm not a small-government fetishist. But so long as the the state is keeping its thumb on the scales, the market will not act rationally like it's supposed to, and as Republicans claim to believe it should. Grist: Environmental News and Commentary ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with ***************************************************************** 24 Rutland Herald: Residents grill Douglas at library Rutland Vermont News & Information March 23, 2007 By Gordon Dritschilo Herald Staff Gov. James Douglas heard what Rutland — or at least some of it — had to say Thursday. About 30 people gathered at the Rutland Free Library for the latest in a series of open forums Douglas has held around the state. The governor made some brief remarks before opening the floor for questions. The discussion ranged from energy policy to school costs. In response to a woman saying she was concerned about the production of nuclear waste at Vermont Yankee, Douglas pointed out that the stabilization of Vermont's electric rates in recent years was due largely to Vermont Yankee and Hydro-Quebec. "Whether the decision (to renew Vermont Yankee's license) is 'yes' or 'no,' we will have a waste disposal problem," he said. "In the long term, the federal government will have responsibility for nuclear waste. … You have to assume they're going to fulfill that responsibility." Later, a man asked the governor why he continued to oppose the development of wind power despite polls showing the majority of Vermonters supporting utility-sized projects. Douglas said the majority of Vermonters support a four-year term for governor, something he did not see happening. "Seriously, I don't think anyone wants me to govern by polls," he said. Douglas said the question for him is not whether to develop wind power, but where and when, and that he has supported proposed projects in the past. He said the costs and benefits of each proposal must be weighed. "If every wind tower proposed in Vermont were constructed, it would generate maybe 6 percent of our power," he said. "I have people coming up to me saying 'you've got to build those wind towers so we can close Vermont Yankee.' It's not even close." Citing a study saying Vermont's forests consume more greenhouse gases than its people produce, one man asked if the state might consider tax breaks for landowners who have more than a 2-acre homestead, but less than the 25 acres needed to qualify for the current use program. Douglas said he found the idea interesting. One man asked if the state might find ways to encourage small schools to consolidate. Douglas said it sounded like a solid concept, and pointed out that Act 60 contained a grant provision for small schools that had roughly the opposite effect. Other ideas tossed out by people at the forum included having the property transfer tax split between the buyer and the seller, having the state work with the National Governors Association to effect national change on issues and requiring guest workers in the state to speak English. Contact Gordon Dritschilo at gordon.dritschilo@rutlandherald.com. © 2007 Rutland Herald ***************************************************************** 25 FR NRC: Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the Doc E7-5335 [Federal Register: March 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 56)] [Notices] [Page 13828] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr23mr07-128] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal; Notice of Meeting The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting on April 4, 2007, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: Wednesday, April 4, 2007--10:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. The purpose of this meeting is to review the Pilgrim license renewal application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Ms. Maitri Banerjee (telephone 301/415-6973) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. Dated: March 15, 2007. Cayetano Santos, Acting Branch Chief, ACRS. [FR Doc. E7-5335 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 26 NRC: NRC to Discuss 2006 Performance Assessment for Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant News Release - Region III - 2007-006 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs, Region III 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532 www.nrc.gov CONTACT: E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear Management Co. on Wednesday, March 28, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last year at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Two Rivers, Wisc. The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Two Creeks Town Hall, 5128 E. Tapawingo Rd. (Intersection of Highway 42 and Tapawingo Road), north of Two Rivers. The NRC staff will present the results of the assessment and be available to respond to questions or comments from the public before the close of the meeting. “The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Point Beach plant and the nation’s other commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss our annual assessment of safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding our regulation of these facilities.” A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/poin_2006q4.pdf. The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Point Beach plant operated safely during the period. The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. The Point Beach plant was placed under heightened regulatory scrutiny in 2003 as a result of earlier equipment problems. In December of last year, the agency determined that the plant had taken sufficient corrective actions to allow its return to routine agency oversight. All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Point Beach during 2006 were determined to be “green.” As a result of the 2006 performance and the termination of the heightened oversight, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline level of inspections during the upcoming year. Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are fire protection, emergency preparedness, maintenance, and equipment testing and inspection. Current performance information for Point Beach is available on the NRC’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/POIN1/poin1_chart.html for Unit 1 and http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/POIN2/poin2_chart.html NRC news releases are available through a free list server subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC Home Page at www.nrc.gov also offers a Subscribe to News link in the News & Information menu. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web Site. Friday, March 23, 2007 ***************************************************************** 27 FR NRC: Virginia Electric and Power Company; Surry Power Station, Unit Doc E7-5340 [Federal Register: March 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 56)] [Notices] [Page 13827-13828] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr23mr07-126] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281] Nos. 1 and 2; Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating Licenses The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted the request of Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee) to withdraw its February 14, 2006, application for proposed amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37 for the Surry Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Surry 1 and 2), located in Surry County, Virginia. The proposed amendments would have revised the Technical Specifications (TSs) pertaining to restricting the minimum cooling time and burnup of spent fuel assemblies that will be placed into storage in the NUHOMS HD spent fuel dry storage system at Surry 1 and 2 starting in the summer of 2006. Specifically, the proposed amendments would add Figure 5.4-2 to the TSs to ensure that the NUHOMS HD canister remains subcritical during operations in the Surry 1 and 2 spent fuel pool. The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments published in the Federal Register on May 16, 2006 (71 FR 28390). However, by letter dated March 12, 2007, the licensee withdrew the proposed change. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for amendments dated February 14, 2006, and the licensee's letter dated March 12, 2007, which withdrew the application for license amendments. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800- 397-4209, or 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of March 2007. [[Page 13828]] For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Siva P. Lingam, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E7-5340 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 28 UPI: La. regulators hold new nuclear rule United Press International - Energy - 3/23/2007 6:21:00 PM -0400 BATON ROUGE, La., March 23 (UPI) -- Louisiana regulators will further study a proposal to entice nuclear plant construction after utility commissioners worried it would be a rush job. Another commissioner said Entergy Corp., the only nuclear firm to participate in the remaking the rules look at construction, would benefit at a time its stock has plumped. "We shouldn't bargain away our rights," Commissioner Jimmy Field of the Louisiana Public Service Commission said after the board postponed any decision. "There are too many unknowns for us to jump in and do it right now. The 30 days will be used to tie down those unknowns." At issues is whether customers would begin paying the costs for building a nuclear plant during reconstruction. In most cases, rates are increased after the project comes online. Building a nuclear plant costs between $3 billion and $4 billion. Both nuclear firms and investors say the economics of going nuclear to create the needed power generation aren't secure yet and getting such up front financing is the enticement a project needs. Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Indiana allow for such payment programs, The Advocate, in Baton Rouge, La., reports. Commissioner Foster Campbell cited the 60 percent increase in Entergy's stock since fall 2005 in expressing his hesitation to approve this aspect of the rule. "My dilemma is to make a sweetheart deal with a company that is flush," Campbell said. "We're making new rules here for a company that is in prosperity." © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 29 UPI: Workers vote to strike at Comanche Peak United Press International - Energy - 3/23/2007 6:17:00 PM -0400 GLEN ROSE, Texas, March 23 (UPI) -- Comanche Peak nuclear plant operators in Texas may strike next month if they and TXU Corp. don't come to terms on a pay raise and pensions for new workers. The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 20 in Fort Worth, Texas, have voted to allow the work stoppage if the 265 operators of the Glen Rose, Texas, plant can't reach a deal with Comanche owners, Dallas-based TXU. "The vote authorized the bargaining unit to call a strike at any time beginning April 24, which is the end of a cooling-off period," said Jesse Whitley, assistant business manager of Local 20, the Fort Worth Start-Telegram reports. Negotiations began last month but have quickly soured. The workers want a 6 percent raise; TXU has offered 3 percent and want new workers to be ineligible for pensions, which Whitley called "unacceptable." Comanche Peak is a base load generator of 2,300 megawatts. TXU as a whole has a generating base of 18,100 megawatts. "Our employees at Comanche Peak are well compensated, consistent with our goal of providing all our employees with a market-competitive total compensation packages," said TXU spokesman Tom Kleckner. He also said the union should negotiate further before authorizing a strike. Kleckner said a back up plan will ensure the dual-reactor plant will remain in operation during a work stoppage. © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 30 UPI: Duke allowed to bill ratepayers for plant United Press International - Energy - 3/22/2007 9:29:00 PM -0400 RALEIGH, N.C., March 22 (UPI) -- North Carolina regulators say Duke Energy can request ratepayers foot part of the preliminary bill for a new nuclear plant, even if one is never built. The North Carolina Utilities Commission agreed with Duke's request, which was based on the multibillion cost for building a nuclear plant. Duke would have to make a formal request to the commission for the rate increase, which it could lessen or even reject, The News & Observer reports. The money would bolster the company's pitch to investors who see a $4 billion nuclear plant as a risky adventure. It would go toward planning costs for the plant. Previously, North Carolina energy projects could only recover costs via increased rates after they were built. "It gives us a general assurance that we should consider nuclear power," said Paige Sheehan, a spokeswoman for Duke. Commissioner Robert Owens Jr. dissented, siding with consumer groups and the state attorney genral. He said shareholders should bare the economic risk of a new nuclear plant and the commission's ruling "eliminated the necessary incentive for Duke to keep those costs as low as possible." © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 31 UPI: Global warming gives nuke power a boost United Press International - NewsTrack - Published: March 23, 2007 at 3:23 PM WASHINGTON, March 23 (UPI) -- Rising concern over global warming is causing some U.S. environmentalists to have second thoughts about nuclear power. USA Today says the groups are considering the possibility that the dangers of nuclear power plants may be outweighed by the nuclear power's lack of greenhouse gas emissions. "I think everybody feels you have to at least look again" at nuclear power, said Judi Greenwald, director of innovative solutions with the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Three other leading environmental organizations -- Union of Concerned Scientists, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense -- say they are willing to give nuclear power a second look. The Sierra Club, however, says it's not changing its mind about the environmental dangers of radioactive waste. "We remain steadfastly opposed to nuclear power," Sierra Club spokesman Josh Dorner told USA Today. Greenpeace USA says it is also opposed. © Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 32 News 14 Carolina: Nuclear watchdog group questions safety at Shearon Harris Updated: 3/22/2007 10:00 PM By: Ann Forte CHATHAM COUNTY, N.C. -- About a dozen elected officials and a handful of concerned residents gathered Thursday to voice their worries about the fire safety regulations at Progress Energy's Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant. "We, as citizens, are very concerned over the dangers that are potentially there, and we want assurances," explained Sen. Ellie Kinnaird, a Democrat from Orange County. Chatham County resident Ann Deupree said, “I’m really concerned about my health and the health of my neighbors, as well as the danger the fire hazard is posting for us." NC WARN – the watchdog group that organized the meeting – says the Harris Plant is unsafe and believes Progress Energy is not doing enough to improve the situation. The group maintains if something is not done, a fire at the plant could have devastating effects for the area. Shearon Harris concerns NC WARN wants Progress Energy to answer questions about fire safety at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant, but Progress Energy maintains the plant is safe. "Why should the regional public wait years longer for them to comply with safety regulations involving a leading risk factor for a nuclear meltdown?" asked NC WARN’s Executive Director Jim Warren. Progress Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission were invited to the meeting but both declined. Progress Energy says the format of the meeting makes it hard to have a balanced discussion about the Shearon Harris Plant. Plus, Progress Energy says, if the plant was doing something wrong, it would not still be in business. “If we weren't meeting the regulations, if we were doing something that impacted the health and safety of the public, they wouldn't allow us to operate," said Julie Hans, who is with Progress Energy. Shearon Harris is located about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh, and it has been in operation since January 1987. Copyright ©2007 TWEAN Newschannel of Raleigh, L.L.C. dba News 14 Carolina ***************************************************************** 33 Boston Globe: AGs seek NRC rule change on terrorism - By Associated Press | March 23, 2007 MONTPELIER, Vt. -- Nine state attorneys general, including those in Vermont and Connecticut, have asked the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to change its rules to allow consideration of a potential terrorist attack on a reactor when it decides whether to extend a plant's license. Reports by the National Academy of Sciences, the NRC's staff, and outside specialists have shown that the pools where reactors store highly radioactive spent fuel "are susceptible to fire and radiological release from a wide range of conditions," seven of the attorneys general wrote in a March 16 letter to the NRC. The letter from attorneys general in Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont followed by one day an NRC decision affirming and earlier ruling that Massachusetts could not raise the potential for terrorism in hearings on the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant's request for a license renewal. "What the NRC did was say, 'Under our existing, rules we can't consider the spent fuel storage issues," said Attorney General William Sorrell of Vermont. Massachusetts then asked the NRC to amend its rules. "This letter is in support of the Massachusetts petition for an amendment to the NRC rules," Sorrell said. Vermont Yankee in Vernon, in the state's southeast corner, is less than 5 miles from the Massachusetts line and just across the Connecticut River from New Hampshire. Its current license expires in 2012, but plant owner Entergy Nuclear is asking for a 20-year extension. © Copyright 2007 Globe Newspaper Company. ***************************************************************** 34 Prague Daily Monitor: Czech nuclear plant Temelin opponents to sue its operator - By Prague Daily Monitor/CTK / Published 23 March 2007 Ceske Budejovice, South Moravia, March 22 (CTK) - The Czech civic association In the Emergency Zone of Nuclear Power Temelin will on Friday lodge a complaint against the CEZ power company that operates the plant, claiming that the plant is at variance with the atomic law, lawyer Radka Dohnalova told journalists today. The association claims that Temelin violates the law because nuclear safety is not given priority in the plant. The plant allegedly uses fuel that twists more than expected. This adversely affects the function of clusters that stop the fition reaction. The court will have 10 days to decide whether it will uphold the association's demand that Temelin's operation be immediately stopped. "We will wait for the examination of the complaint and the court decision. We observe all relevant laws," plant spokesman Milan Nebesar told CTK. The activists also support their complaint by the results of tests in which the number of defective clusters is constantly growing. They say that the State Office for Nuclear Safety (SUJB) belittles the risk. Nuclear fuel is supplied to Temelin by U.S. company Westinghouse with which CEZ has a contract until 2010. It will then be replaced by Russia's TVEL. The contract is worth several billion crowns. It provides for fuel supplies for another 10 year after 2010 during which TVEL should supply the plant with about 400 tonnes of fuel. The company also supplies fuel to the other Czech nuclear power plant in Dukovany, south Moravia. ($1=21.016 crowns) This story copyright 2007 CTK Czech News Agency The Prague Daily Monitor and Monitor CE are not responsible for its content. Prague Daily Monitor/CTK | 22 March ] ***************************************************************** 35 Mid Hudson News: Orange County lawmakers consider calling for Indian Point ISA Covering the Hudson to the Catskills! Friday, March 23, 2007 Copyright © 2007 Mid-Hudson News Network, a division of Statewide Goshen – The Public Safety Committee of the Orange County Legislature Thursday unanimously voted to call on Congress to require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to conduct an independent safety review of the Indian Point nuclear power plants. Legislator Roxanne Donnery of Highland Falls, who lives within the 10 mile warning zone for the power plants, said it is important to have that review. “They are looking for relicensing for 20 more years on plants that are already over 30 years of age, and with the history that we have between the safety record and the current uncontrolled, uncorrected leaks of the radioactive materials, and our failed warning sirens here in Orange County and elsewhere,” she said. Other counties in the Hudson Valley have called for an ISA as have the area’s federal lawmakers. HEAR today's news on MidHudsonRadio.com, the Hudson Valley's only ***************************************************************** 36 AFP: Japan to tighten nuclear rules after near misses - Fri Mar 23, 4:03 AM ET TOKYO (AFP) - Japan said Friday it would tighten its rules on the reporting of nuclear incidents after the recent revelation of a series of past near misses. Industry minister Akira Amari said power firms would be required to report all cases of dislodged nuclear control rods, not just those that cause uncontrollable chain reactions known as "criticality accidents". "These cases may develop into a problem that threatens safety," he said at a news conference. Tokyo Electric Power Co. admitted Thursday that five nuclear control rods came off a reactor in central Fukushima prefecture almost 30 years ago, apparently causing chain reactions reportedly lasting more than seven hours. The control rods are designed to regulate the distribution of power in the reactor and can stop a nuclear reaction if needed. A series of past incidents have come to light since Hokuriku Electric Power Co. admitted last week that it failed to report a June 1999 incident that caused a 15-minute uncontrollable chain reaction. Nobody was hurt but news of the cover-up provoked an outcry as the incident took place just three months before one of Japan's worst nuclear accidents which killed two workers and exposed 600 people to radiation. The government is encouraging power companies to reveal all past incidents in a bid to restore public confidence and improve safety. Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said Tokyo Electric Power's criticality accident was "something that must not occur." The power companies "must recover the trust from people and work to secure their lives," said Shiozaki, the government's top spokesman. Resource-poor Japan relies on nuclear power for 30 percent of its needs, but the construction of reactors is frequently met with public resistance due to safety concerns. Japan, the only nation ever attacked with atomic bombs, is also sensitive about possible radiation leakage from nuclear reactor plants. Copyright © 2007 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The ***************************************************************** 37 Japan Times: Tepco hid 7 1/2-hour criticality accident? japantimes.co.jp Web Friday, March 23, 2007 Kyodo News Five dislodged control rods probably caused a 7 1/2-hour criticality accident at a Fukushima nuclear plant run by Tokyo Electric Power Co. in 1978, an internal probe by the utility and the reactor's builder, Toshiba Corp., revealed Thursday. A probe also uncovered two more cases where a control rod dislodged from a reactor core at the No. 1 plant in Fukushima Prefecture -- the plant's No. 5 reactor in February 1979 and its No. 2 reactor in September 1980. None of the cases was apparently reported to the government, Japan's largest electric power firm said. On Tuesday, Tepco said two control rods came off at its Fukushima No. 2 nuclear plant's No. 3 reactor in June 1993 and at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant's No. 1 reactor in Niigata Prefecture in April 2000 during suspensions for routine checks. Neither incident resulted in a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction, according to the Tokyo-based utility, which had to shut down all of its reactors in 2003 when it was revealed it had covered up flaws. In the 1978 case in Fukushima, the problem at the No. 3 reactor had "caused criticality," Tokyo Electric officials said, quoting a source familiar with the case. The uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction may have lasted up to 7 1/2 hours, according to the investigation. "We have so far not been able to confirm data that back up the testimony, because it is an incident from a long time ago," an official of the utility said. All three incidents that emerged Thursday apparently took place during regular checkups and in the course of work to fasten control rods, utility officials said. Last week, it was revealed that in 1999 one of Hokuriku Electric Power Co.'s reactors in Ishikawa Prefecture suffered a self-sustaining chain reaction that lasted 15 minutes after control rods fell off. The accident caused no harm to workers or outside effects. Since the revelation, a number of electric utilities have come forward with their own cases of control-rod detachments at their nuclear plants. Meanwhile, critics are questioning the government's past nuclear plant checks, arguing the recent spate of coverups proves they were ineffective. Teruyuki Matsushita, 58, a former municipal assembly member in Mihama, a Fukui Prefecture town hosting Kansai Electric Power Co.'s Mihama plant, said locals must stand up against the state's energy policy, even at the expense of huge local subsidies host towns are annually receiving. The Japan Times ***************************************************************** 38 Japan Times: Utilities face order to report all reactor mishaps japantimes.co.jp Web Saturday, March 24, 2007 Kyodo News The government will require power companies to report even minor reactor troubles that may lead to a major accident, in the wake of a slew of coverups at atomic plants, Industry minister Akira Amari said Friday. Under the plan, power utilities will be obliged to report to the nation's nuclear safety watchdog when they find a control rod or rods dislodged from a reactor core at a nuclear plant while the reactor is not in operation, Amari said. Friday's announcement follows revelations Thursday by Tokyo Electric Power Co. that it probably suffered a criticality accident at the No. 3 reactor of its Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant nearly 30 years ago when five reactor control rods came off. Earlier reports said the uncontrolled chain reaction may have lasted 7 1/2 hours. Such reporting by power companies is not currently required unless such incidents result in a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction, or criticality. Control rods are used to regulate a reactor's output by absorbing neutrons at its core. Amari said that by revising the ministry ordinance, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry will expand the scope of reactor troubles that utilities are required to report to the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, which is under the ministry. Amari said the ministry will take action after conducting a public hearing about the issue. The announcement came as METI pushes for power companies to examine all their past and present operations and report all irregularities they find by the end of the month as part of efforts to restore public confidence in nuclear power. "We are doing this kind of work to establish (the reputation) that Japan's nuclear power facilities are the safest in the world," Amari said. "We are checking all past incidents and trying to see what we can learn from them," he said. "By doing so, we would like to make Japan establish the world's firmest system to prevent accidents in advance." On March 15, Hokuriku Electric Power Co. said it failed to report to the government a 15-minute, uncontrollable criticality accident at its reactor in Ishikawa Prefecture in 1999. On Monday, Tohoku Electric Power Co. and Chubu Electric Power Co. said reactor control rods had fallen off in 1988 and 1991 at reactors in Miyagi and Shizuoka prefectures, respectively. All three cases stemmed from a mishandling of valves in a system to control water pressure for moving control rods. The Japan Times ***************************************************************** 39 AU ABC : Nuclear power essential to reducing CO2 emissions: physicist. 23/03/2007. ABC News Online An Australian National University physicist says nuclear power must be considered if Australia is serious about reducing carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation. Professor Aiden Byrne says nuclear energy is a safe technology that has proven it can produce electricity to the levels needed by the Australian community. Professor Byrne says the historical risks of nuclear power must be considered fairly against the number of deaths in the oil, gas and coal industries. "Australia is really very fortunate, it has a lot of space where it can put wind turbines, a lot of sun where it can exploit solar, but it is also sitting on a good fraction of the world's uranium resources," he said. "In terms of opportunities, Australia does have an opportunity and also nuclear has actually proven it can meet base line load." ***************************************************************** 40 NRC: Stolen Nuclear Gauge Found in Philadelphia News Release - Region I - 2007-010 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs, Region I 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 www.nrc.gov CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610) 337-5330 Neil A. Sheehan (610) 337-5331 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been notified that a nuclear gauge reported stolen from a construction site in Philadelphia on Monday has been located at a facility in the city’s Nicetown section. The gauge was found yesterday morning at Nicetown Salvage Co. on Germantown Avenue near Lycoming Street. Radiation surveys conducted by the NRC and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection did not detect contamination in the building. At no time was public health and safety in danger. The gauge, containing small amounts of radioactive material, is used for industrial purposes such as measuring the density of soil at construction sites. On Monday (March 19), Underwood Engineering, of Belmar, N.J., reported the gauge and its bright-yellow transportation case were stolen from a truck parked at a construction site at 3301 Tasker St., Philadelphia. Underwood Engineering is arranging to recover the gauge. NRC inspectors will monitor the removal of the gauge and will also confirm that all radioactive material has been removed. In the meantime, the gauge is safely stored inside the salvage company building. Access to the building is being controlled. Five individuals who were in the building were taken to the hospital yesterday as a precaution. The hospital verified that they were not contaminated. NRC news releases are available through a free list server subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC Home Page at www.nrc.gov also offers a Subscribe to News link in the News & Information menu. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web Site. Friday, March 23, 2007 ***************************************************************** 41 Daily Sun: Radioactive water near Hopi springs Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:10:54 -0800 http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2007032213594451 U.S.A.: Radioactive water near Hopi springs Thursday, March 22 2007 @ 01:59 PM PDT Two Hopi villages and their wells lie in the path of a radioactive plume of water A plume of radioactive water is moving toward two Hopi villages, threatening to contaminate wells and spring-fed drinking water for about 1,000 residents. Radioactive water near Hopi springs By CYNDY COLE Daily Sun Staff Two Hopi villages and their wells lie in the path of a radioactive plume of water A plume of radioactive water is moving toward two Hopi villages, threatening to contaminate wells and spring-fed drinking water for about 1,000 residents. Nothing has been done to contain or remove the waste. Hydrologists, geochemists and consultants have said the radioactive waste appears to have been taken from a Cold War-era uranium milling site near Tuba City and buried at a public dump 1 mile east of the communities. The villages of Upper Moenkopi and Lower Moencopi have seen levels of radioactive uranium in their ground water that appear to be above normal for the area, though these levels are still well within drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Hopi water managers fear these readings are a sign the leading edge of the radioactive plume might already be hitting the villages' groundwater supply. "It's a matter of jeopardizing people's lives" if nothing is done, said Harris Polelonema, community service administrator for Lower Moencopi. Everyone's trash heap Tuba City's dump was opened by the Bureau of Indian Affairs a mile east of town. It was used for more than 40 years until it was covered with sand in 1997. Situated on the boundary marking Hopi and Navajo lands, the dump was a disposal site for medical waste, animal carcasses, paint, batteries and tires, nearby residents said in interviews. "We have no paper record of what's actually in the site," said Lynelle Hartway, an attorney working for the Hopi Tribe. This makes it difficult to assign responsibility for the estimated $23 million cost of removing contaminants thoroughly, which is what both tribal governments want. Test wells at the dump show uranium levels up to 10 times higher than the level the EPA considers safe for drinking water. This uranium plume appears to be moving south and west toward Upper Moenkopi and local washes. If the villages' water and the Navajo Aquifer were to become contaminated, the uranium could bioaccumulate in produce that the Hopi people depend on and in natural vegetation consumed by the livestock, researchers fear. "While the problem isn't too dramatic based on concentration, the cumulative effect over time could be," said geochemist Bill Walker, who analyzed the site. No one's responsibility People working for both tribes have been seeking to have the dump cleaned up and the radioactive water pumped out, but they have made little headway over the years. The Department of Energy won't clean up the dump because the Navajo Nation didn't raise the issue soon enough and because it contains much more than just radioactive waste. The tribe should have raised the issue before the department's congressional authority to conduct cleanups under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation Act expired in 1998, the department told Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. in letters. And the EPA has been hesitant to designate the dump a federal cleanup site, because it isn't an immediate danger. "The emergency response office decided there was not an emergency and immediate risk to the public," said Andrew Bain, EPA's remedial project manager for Superfund in the West. That leaves open the possibility of trying to bill cleanup costs to the company that merged with Rare Metals Corporation: El Paso Natural Gas Company. Building a case Some EPA and other government officials have suggested the radioactive waste in the dump could not be the result of uranium milling operations just a few miles down the road. Or perhaps, they said, it occurred naturally. But during a geochemical analysis at the dump, Ray Johnson and Laurie Wirt, of the U.S. Geological Survey, found similarities between the uranium found in the dump and the types of ore milled at the nearby Rare Metals Corporation uranium mill. Wirt died in a boating accident in 2006. Walker, the geochemist and consultant, has found that the geology around Tuba City is "highly unlikely" to host uranium deposits, meaning it doesn't form there naturally. Instead, he's also found evidence linking the radioactive plume in the dump to the chemicals used in the milling process at the Rare Metals mill. "We've got fingerprints and good, solid data," Walker said. But the person the EPA has assigned to work on this site, Carl Warren, isn't convinced the radioactive plume poses a threat to human health. Nor is Warren certain there's any connection between what's in the radioactive dump and the uranium that was processed at Rare Metals. Neither is the Department of Energy -- the agency usually responsible for cleaning up radioactive waste left over from wartime weapons production. "The DOE did not find any evidence that would support the allegations that Rare Metals Corporation disposed of contaminated equipment or uranium mill tailings at the Tuba City landfill," it said in a letter to Shirley. " ... DOE believes that the ground water contamination discussed in your letter is not from the former mill site but is from the Tuba City landfill or some other nearby source." Giving up the springs The villages of upper Moenkopi and lower Moencopi live differently, but share the same water sources that naturally flow out of the ground. Upper Moenkopi has electricity and running water inside the homes. Lower Moencopi has electricity in a few homes. The stone and mortar houses lack plumbing because the traditional property owners elect not to install most utilities. Lower village residents get water by going outside to a handful of faucets hooked up to gravity-loaded pipes fed by springs. On a sandy road in the upper village, a metal pipe sticks out of a hillside spring, "Susungva," under a large tree. It pours clear, cold water into a basin of stone, next to a valley where Hopi farmers plant their fields every year. It's common to stop here and take a mouthful straight from the pipe. "Even those that have running water in their homes, they still like to drink that spring water," said Chiropractor Alan Numkena, the lieutenant governor of Upper Moenkopi. Upper Moenkopi has drilled wells to tap the deeper Coconino Aquifer as an alternative water source, but the villages need a $1.4 million reverse osmosis treatment system to make the water potable due to salinity. There's no funding to pay for the treatment system, said Wilbert Honahni Sr., an economic development specialist with the Moenkopi Developers Corporation, a non-profit. And in a village where two to three families sometimes share a house, there are many other competing financial priorities. There are going to be house-to-house surveys, interviews about the dump and public meetings for these residents in the months to come. Every fact must be documented in the political attempt to gain funds, excavate the contaminants of the dump and pump out the radioactive plume. More test wells are pending near the dump, to see how far the uranium contamination has traveled. The village drinking water will be tested routinely. "We tell them," said Hartway, the attorney for the Hopi Tribe, "that we will do whatever we can to know exactly what is in their water." http://www.azdailysun.com/articles/2007/03/18/news/20070318_news_37.prt

And the contamination continues - if more nuclear power plants are built more uranium mines will be built and more people will suffer.  Nukes are not the answer!!  Molly

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2007032213594451

U.S.A.: Radioactive water near Hopi springs

   
Two Hopi villages and their wells lie in the path of a radioactive plume of water

A plume of radioactive water is moving toward two Hopi villages, threatening to contaminate wells and spring-fed drinking water for about 1,000 residents.

Radioactive water near Hopi springs

By CYNDY COLE
Daily Sun Staff

Two Hopi villages and their wells lie in the path of a radioactive plume of water

A plume of radioactive water is moving toward two Hopi villages, threatening to contaminate wells and spring-fed drinking water for about 1,000 residents.

Nothing has been done to contain or remove the waste.

Hydrologists, geochemists and consultants have said the radioactive waste appears to have been taken from a Cold War-era uranium milling site near Tuba City and buried at a public dump 1 mile east of the communities.

The villages of Upper Moenkopi and Lower Moencopi have seen levels of radioactive uranium in their ground water that appear to be above normal for the area, though these levels are still well within drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Hopi water managers fear these readings are a sign the leading edge of the radioactive plume might already be hitting the villages' groundwater supply.

"It's a matter of jeopardizing people's lives" if nothing is done, said Harris Polelonema, community service administrator for Lower Moencopi.

Everyone's trash heap

Tuba City's dump was opened by the Bureau of Indian Affairs a mile east of town. It was used for more than 40 years until it was covered with sand in 1997. Situated on the boundary marking Hopi and Navajo lands, the dump was a disposal site for medical waste, animal carcasses, paint, batteries and tires, nearby residents said in interviews.

"We have no paper record of what's actually in the site," said Lynelle Hartway, an attorney working for the Hopi Tribe.

This makes it difficult to assign responsibility for the estimated $23 million cost of removing contaminants thoroughly, which is what both tribal governments want.

Test wells at the dump show uranium levels up to 10 times higher than the level the EPA considers safe for drinking water. This uranium plume appears to be moving south and west toward Upper Moenkopi and local washes.

If the villages' water and the Navajo Aquifer were to become contaminated, the uranium could bioaccumulate in produce that the Hopi people depend on and in natural vegetation consumed by the livestock, researchers fear.

"While the problem isn't too dramatic based on concentration, the cumulative effect over time could be," said geochemist Bill Walker, who analyzed the site.

No one's responsibility

People working for both tribes have been seeking to have the dump cleaned up and the radioactive water pumped out, but they have made little headway over the years.

The Department of Energy won't clean up the dump because the Navajo Nation didn't raise the issue soon enough and because it contains much more than just radioactive waste.

The tribe should have raised the issue before the department's congressional authority to conduct cleanups under the Uranium Mill Tailings Remediation Act expired in 1998, the department told Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. in letters.

And the EPA has been hesitant to designate the dump a federal cleanup site, because it isn't an immediate danger.

"The emergency response office decided there was not an emergency and immediate risk to the public," said Andrew Bain, EPA's remedial project manager for Superfund in the West.

That leaves open the possibility of trying to bill cleanup costs to the company that merged with Rare Metals Corporation: El Paso Natural Gas Company.

Building a case

Some EPA and other government officials have suggested the radioactive waste in the dump could not be the result of uranium milling operations just a few miles down the road. Or perhaps, they said, it occurred naturally.

But during a geochemical analysis at the dump, Ray Johnson and Laurie Wirt, of the U.S. Geological Survey, found similarities between the uranium found in the dump and the types of ore milled at the nearby Rare Metals Corporation uranium mill.

Wirt died in a boating accident in 2006.

Walker, the geochemist and consultant, has found that the geology around Tuba City is "highly unlikely" to host uranium deposits, meaning it doesn't form there naturally.

Instead, he's also found evidence linking the radioactive plume in the dump to the chemicals used in the milling process at the Rare Metals mill.

"We've got fingerprints and good, solid data," Walker said.

But the person the EPA has assigned to work on this site, Carl Warren, isn't convinced the radioactive plume poses a threat to human health.

Nor is Warren certain there's any connection between what's in the radioactive dump and the uranium that was processed at Rare Metals.

Neither is the Department of Energy -- the agency usually responsible for cleaning up radioactive waste left over from wartime weapons production.

"The DOE did not find any evidence that would support the allegations that Rare Metals Corporation disposed of contaminated equipment or uranium mill tailings at the Tuba City landfill," it said in a letter to Shirley. " ... DOE believes that the ground water contamination discussed in your letter is not from the former mill site but is from the Tuba City landfill or some other nearby source."

Giving up the springs

The villages of upper Moenkopi and lower Moencopi live differently, but share the same water sources that naturally flow out of the ground.

Upper Moenkopi has electricity and running water inside the homes.

Lower Moencopi has electricity in a few homes. The stone and mortar houses lack plumbing because the traditional property owners elect not to install most utilities.

Lower village residents get water by going outside to a handful of faucets hooked up to gravity-loaded pipes fed by springs.

On a sandy road in the upper village, a metal pipe sticks out of a hillside spring, "Susungva," under a large tree. It pours clear, cold water into a basin of stone, next to a valley where Hopi farmers plant their fields every year. It's common to stop here and take a mouthful straight from the pipe.

"Even those that have running water in their homes, they still like to drink that spring water," said Chiropractor Alan Numkena, the lieutenant governor of Upper Moenkopi.

Upper Moenkopi has drilled wells to tap the deeper Coconino Aquifer as an alternative water source, but the villages need a $1.4 million reverse osmosis treatment system to make the water potable due to salinity.

There's no funding to pay for the treatment system, said Wilbert Honahni Sr., an economic development specialist with the Moenkopi Developers Corporation, a non-profit. And in a village where two to three families sometimes share a house, there are many other competing financial priorities.

There are going to be house-to-house surveys, interviews about the dump and public meetings for these residents in the months to come. Every fact must be documented in the political attempt to gain funds, excavate the contaminants of the dump and pump out the radioactive plume.

More test wells are pending near the dump, to see how far the uranium contamination has traveled. The village drinking water will be tested routinely.

"We tell them," said Hartway, the attorney for the Hopi Tribe, "that we will do whatever we can to know exactly what is in their water."

http://www.azdailysun.com/articles/2007/03/18/news/20070318_news_37.prt


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"The lowest standards of ethics of which a right-thinking man can possibly conceive is taught to the common soldier whose trade is to shoot his fellow men. In youth he may have learned the command, 'Thou shalt not kill,' but the ruler takes the boy just as he enters manhood and teaches him that his highest duty is to shoot a bullet through his neighbor's heart - and this, unmoved by passion or feeling or hatred, and without the least regard to right or wrong, but simply because his ruler gives the word." Clarence Darrow, Resist Not Evil


Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
_______________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Unsubscribe Here: http://www.energyjustice.net/nukenet/ Change your settings or access the archives at: http://mail.energyjustice.net/mailman/listinfo/nukenet_energyjustice.net ***************************************************************** 42 DAILY YOMIURI : Govt to require power companies to report control rod slippages In the wake of recent reports of a series of criticality accidents, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency of the Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry decided Friday to require electric power companies to report any unexpected slippage of control rods in nuclear power reactors to the government. The Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Akira Amari told reporters that the ministry planned to revise the law regulating nuclear reactors as early as May. Under instructions from the government, in-house investigations at electric power companies have revealed a total of eight similar accidents that occurred at four companies' power plants between 1978 and 2000. At the Hokuriku Electric Power Co.'s Shika nuclear power plant, three of the 89 control rods inserted into the reactor core fell out during a regular checkup in 1999, leading to a criticality accident. At Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power station, where five control rods slipped out in 1978, the same type of accident very likely occurred. However, eight such accidents, including the previously mentioned two cases, were not immediately reported to the government. Although the current law requires the companies to report criticality accidents or emergency shutdowns, they do not have to report the slippage of control rods during regular checkups when the reactor is not in operation. The slippage of control rods, which has repeatedly happened at several power stations, apparently was caused by operational mistakes involving water pressure valves that controlled the control rods. If such information was reported to the government and shared among relevant parties, the criticality accident at the Shika nuclear power plant could have been prevented. The structure of a nuclear reactor can maintain its safety if one control rod slips out. However, the revised law will oblige electric power companies to report cases in which a control rod moves even when the reactor is not in operation. ) The Daily Yomiuri, The Yomiuri Shimbun ***************************************************************** 43 ICT: Western Shoshone integral in stopping Divine Strake detonation [2007/03/23] Posted: March 23, 2007 by: Wishelle Banks Analysis MERCURY, Nev. - Government doublespeak is nothing new in Indian country; virtually from the days of first contact, Natives have been deflecting verbal and political subterfuge, broken treaties and both covert and blatant threats to Mother Earth. In a contemporary, ongoing battle and multi-state, multi-agency and multi-cultural effort to halt what the U.S. government called ''a scientific experiment designed to significantly advance the nation's ability to defeat underground facilities that produce and store weapons of mass destruction,'' the Western Shoshone Nation was at the heart of the feds' decision to back off from the proposed Divine Strake test detonation. In a Feb. 22 statement, Defense Threat Reduction Agency Director James Tegnelia said, ''I have become convinced that it's time to look at alternative methods that obviate the need for this type of large-scale test. This decision was not based on any technical information that indicates the test would produce harm to workers, the general public, or the environment.'' Conversely, Western Shoshone elder and activist Carrie Dann last year asserted that the indigenous peoples of North America ''decry all weapons of mass destruction as they are first tested upon us, and we oppose the use of these weapons against all other peoples or nations.'' The 700-ton ammonium nitrate and fuel oil test - touted as non-nuclear by the DTRA - at the Nevada Test Site is a vivid illustration of how the American government consistently attempts to impose its will on its citizens. And in a long-term display of unity and solidarity that included members of the Western Shoshone Defense Project, senators and representatives from Nevada and Utah, and ''downwinders'' and their survivors, the people have spoken, creating enough pressure that forced the government to finally cancel the explosion that would have created a mushroom-shaped cloud in the desert. For Janice Gardipe, a Western Shoshone/Northern Paiute grandmother of eight who's lived in her ancestral territory her entire life, it was a force far greater than these toxic elements that she now credits for the cancellation. ''What I really believe is that prayers to Creator stopped it,'' Gardipe said. ''In Washington, at the Pentagon, [protesters] talked about putting a halt on it, to our senators. That's all political. But I think it's natural law, and Creator, that stopped it. They had a ceremony last summer at that site. They haven't stopped praying, and through Creator it stopped. A lot of people thought that was amazing. You just don't go against the government.'' After being part of the solution that succeeded in persuading the U.S. government to more than once postpone Divine Strake, Gardipe spoke of the inspiration to join the fight - to the end. ''I was inspired by my ancestors that have passed on - my dad, his family, all of my ancestors before me - and my grandchildren. I think of them, and Mary and Carrie Dann. All of them really motivated me to get going. I just think of our future generations. We have to protect our land for them. In the past, all of our ancestors have prayed for us, and in return we pray for future generations to come.'' Last year, when Gardipe refused to simply sit back and let Divine Strake occur on Newe Sogobia - Western Shoshone homelands - and joined other activists in stopping it, she dreamed of the day that the underdog would triumph. It happened on Feb. 22. ''I was so excited,'' recalled Gardipe. ''I got an e-mail from [WSDP and Citizen Alert activist] Lee Dazey. She's been really instrumental in this, and has been an activist for many years. I was just really happy, so joyful. I was hollering all by myself. The people really had their voices heard.'' Yet Gardipe said she is naturally wary that this is truly the end of Divine Strake and other deadly detonations designed to upset the Earth's delicate balance, expressing her skepticism that it really is over. ''You know it's not,'' she noted. ''With our government, they'll have other ways. Down the road, something else will come up.'' In typical fashion, the DTRA's press release seemed to leave the gate open for the next round of assault on Native lands and its people, rationalizing in a classic, bureaucratic tone how much America needs to defend itself from external dangers. ''DTRA will attempt to develop alternative scientific means for obtaining the important data that this experiment would have provided,'' Tegnelia asserted. ''Such methods to assess capabilities to defeat underground facilities do not currently exist. The agency will develop advanced analysis techniques and conduct confirmatory experiments at a much smaller scale to assist in developing new capabilities to defeat underground facilities.'' Moreover, Tegnelia's press release also implied that U.S. citizens are at the core for more experiments that the government itself is demanding: ''There is a national consensus on the need to improve conventional capabilities to defeat underground targets that pose a threat to the United States. DTRA remains committed to help develop non-nuclear means to defeat underground targets. I am optimistic that we will succeed.'' For now, though, the natural law to which Gardipe referred continues to prevail. When Divine Strake or a similar test once again rises to the surface - prompting yet another battle in a war based not so much on terror, but on terrorizing internal threats designed to disable both the people and their voice - she said she'll be right back on the front lines, rallying the power of the people. ''Oh, definitely,'' Gardipe promised. IMPORTANT NOTE: The indiancountry.com website is designed to be and functions as a different entity than our print products. There are stories and features included in the print editions of the newspaper and magazines that are not included on the website. Likewise, there are features of the website that are not included in the print editions. Indian Country Today strives to provide many media options that will serve the different needs of different users. We hope that users find utility in several of our products, and we appreciate your continued support. By using this service, you accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Statement. © 1998 - 2007 Indian Country Today. All Rights Reserved  ***************************************************************** 44 UN Pushes Ahead With Multinational Enrichment Plan To Prevent Nuclear Proliferation Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:00:25 -0400 UN PUSHES AHEAD WITH MULTINATIONAL ENRICHMENT PLAN TO PREVENT NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION New York, Mar 23 2007 1:00PM Pushing ahead with efforts to set up a multinational framework for uranium enrichment to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation and the possibility of their falling into the hands of terrorists, the United Nations atomic watchdog agency is exploring with Russia the possible establishment of an international enrichment centre in Siberia. International Atomic Energy Agency (<"http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2007/russiatalks.html">IAEA) Deputy Director General Yury Sokolov led the UN side in talks this week with Russian officials at the Angarsk Electrolysis Chemical Complex, a manufacturer of low-enriched uranium, which Russia is proposing should be the site of an international centre. Low enriched uranium is the fuel for nuclear power plants, but enriched to a higher degree it can be used to make nuclear weapons. Mr. Sokolov told a press conference that the Agency’s main point of concern about proposals discussed with Russia was provision of a mechanism to ensure that States which have been isolated for political reasons continue to receive nuclear fuel. Russian officials told the press conference that the talks had made positive progress. Russia is currently in negotiations with Kazakhstan to establish a joint enrichment facility at the Angarsk complex, which is north of Irkutsk in south eastern Siberia. Both IAEA Director-General Mohammed ElBaradei and Russian President Vladimir Putin have proposed putting enrichment under multinational control to reduce proliferation risks. The system would provide assurance of supply to States considering developing nuclear power and avoid the need for them to build their own nuclear fuel production capability. The so-called front end of the nuclear fuel cycle, when fuel is enriched, as well as the back end, when spent fuel is reprocessed, provide points that pose proliferation risks because material can be potentially diverted and used to produce weapons. A cornerstone of Mr. ElBaradei’s proposal is a fuel bank of last resort that would offer users of the system the insurance of guaranteed delivery if their regular supplies were interrupted. “The longer we delay in placing sensitive nuclear operations under multinational control, the more new countries will seek to build such facilities,” he said in a speech last year, calling for a unified international approach “so that no one country would have exclusive control over the most sensitive parts of the fuel cycle.” In September, the Nuclear Threat Initiative donated $50 million provided by United States billionaire Warren Buffet to the proposed fuel bank on condition that the contribution is matched by an amount of $100 million. The proposals for international uranium enrichment centres come amid a revival of interest in nuclear power as a means of generating electricity and fears about the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Mr. ElBaradei is to present a paper about supply assurance to the next meeting of the IAEA’s Board of Governors in June. 2007-03-23 00:00:00.000 ___________________ For more details go to UN News Centre at http://www.un.org/news To listen to news and in-depth programmes from UN Radio go to: http://radio.un.org/ _______________________________ To change your profile or unsubscribe go to: http://www.un.org/apps/news/email/ ***************************************************************** 45 reviewjournal.com: Porter: Yucca Mountain 'still alive' Mar. 23, 2007 STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU WASHINGTON -- Rep. Jon Porter took a big swing at Yucca Mountain spending this week. After failing to hit the nuclear waste project head-on, he aimed a followup blow against Democrats. In the House Budget Committee late Wednesday, Porter, a Republican, promoted an amendment that would have put pressure on Congress to delete $494.5 million in 2008 spending for Yucca, the entire amount requested by the Energy Department. It would have zeroed out Yucca Mountain from a nonbinding budget resolution, a Democrat-written blueprint lawmakers will consult when they pass spending bills later this year. Porter argued the Yucca project was riddled with quality assurance problems and beyond repair. But Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., said the amendment was too far-reaching to be debated in five or 10 minutes. Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas, said the issue needed to be handled by the Appropriations Committee. The amendment was defeated 23-12. Eleven Republicans joined Porter in voting for the amendment. Twenty-two Democrats and one Republican, Dan Lungren of California, voted to kill it. "The real message is the majority of Republicans on this committee are saying time out and the majority of Democrats said move forward," on nuclear waste in Nevada, Porter said after the vote. He said it underscored that Nevada has enemies in both parties when it comes to Yucca Mountain, not just Republicans. "The reality is that Yucca Mountain is still alive," Porter said. That is a different message than "Yucca Mountain is dead," that Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., has promoted. When Porter put out a press release declaring Democrats "unanimously voted to keep the project alive," it ruffled feathers in the office of Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev. She would have persuaded Democrats to vote against Yucca Mountain, but Porter did not invite her help, Berkley spokesman David Cherry said. "Perhaps some Democrats would have come along had someone made an overture toward the senior member of the Nevada House delegation and its only Democrat." As for the message that Democrats are pro-Yucca, Cherry said, "Dumping nuclear waste in Nevada has been a priority for President Bush since he took office in 2001." Nevada lawmakers said other chances to attack Yucca funding will arise this year. Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal, 1997 - 2007 ***************************************************************** 46 AU ABC: Evans' uranium opposition U-turn ABC Queensland | Local News Evans' uranium opposition U-turn 09:00 (ACDT)Friday, 23 March 2007. 07:00 (AWDT) No new mines: Chris Evans wants the policy scrapped (file photo).ABC TV One of the key members of federal Labor's left faction has dropped his opposition to uranium mining. The party is set to debate the issue at next month's national conference. Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd is pushing for the 'no new mines' policy to be scrapped. Labor's Senate Leader, Chris Evans, has joined the push. "I think the mood now is that we need to move on it," he said. "I don't think it's got anything to do with the Howard Government, this is about updating Labor's policy and in part being ready for government. "This policy hasn't worked and it won't work so we need to abandon it." Meanwhile Queensland Premier Peter Beattie says he will support uranium mining in Queensland. A spokesman for the Premier has confirmed Mr Beattie has backed away from his strong opposition to uranium mining after a government commissioned report showed it would not threaten Queensland's coal industry. Mr Beattie says he will support uranium mining at the Labor conference on the condition that it is only sold to countries that have signed the non-proliferation treaty. Mr Beattie is currently on a trade mission in Africa. The policy shift by Mr Beattie leaves Western Australia isolated in its opposition to uranium mining. Western Australian Premier Alan Carpenter has been opposed to uranium mining in the state despite increasing pressure over the past year to review his no-uranium policy. Mr Carpenter has previously said there will need to be a change of government before uranium mining can proceed in Western Australia. He has said that the ALP has won two elections with an anti-uranium stance and will go to the next election in 2009 with the same policy. The Australian Workers Union is pleased with Mr Beattie's turnaround. The AWU's state secretary, Bill Ludwig, says uranium mining would greatly benefit Queensland's economy. "Up in the north-west province around Mt Isa there's probably 400 jobs, something like $500,000 in royalties to the Queensland treasury coffers," he said. "There are some great opportunities for Queensland." Related Audio Labor MPs move to scrap uranium policy There are moves afoot for Labor to ditch its policy against new uranium mines, after the party already scrapped its decade-long opposition to privatising Telstra and its Latham-era policy to redirect some funding from wealthy private schools. MP3 RealMedia 28k+ WinMedia 28k+ ***************************************************************** 47 AU ABC: Carpenter stands tough on no uranium mining policy ABC Queensland | Local News 16:35 (ACDT)Friday, 23 March 2007. 14:35 (AWDT) Alan Carpenter says he will not be pressured. (File photo) The Western Australian Premier Alan Carpenter says uranium could be the answer to the state's future energy needs, but says the ban on its mining will remain while he is in Government. The WA Chamber of Minerals and Energy's chief executive Tim Shanahan supports a change of heart by Queensland to allow uranium mining. "The change in position from Queensland hopefully will flow through to a more consistent and positive view of uranium mining throughout Australia," he said. However Mr Carpenter says he will not be pressured and each state should be able to make its own decision on the issue. "If the West Australian people don't want to have the mining of uranimum and the indication to me is that they don't then we won't be having the mining of uranium in this state." However he says uranium could well be the source of the staste's future energy needs once coal and gas reserves are depleted. The WA Labor Senator Chris Evans says the party should abandon the "no new mines" policy because it has not worked. But he says he supports Alan Carpenter's decision to stand firm against uranium mining. "The decision about uranium mining, quite frankly in terms of the WA economy is marginal and this is a decision for the State Government," he said. "Alan Carpenter said he went to the election with a promise not to mine uranium in WA, he's honouring that commitment and I congratulate him for it." WA is under more pressure to scrap its ban on uranium mining after the Queensland Premier had a change of heart on the issue. Mr Carpenter says it would open the door for WA becoming a nuclear waste dump. He says the state should reserve its uranium supplies for the future when its gas and coal reserves run out. "Economically we don't need to be shovelling out uranium right now, but it may well be that in 20, 30, 40 years time or even 50 years time, we do need uranium as an energy source," he said. He says problems related to nuclear waste could be resolved by that time. The Chamber of Minerals and Energy supports Queensland's move. It says WA is missing out on economic benefits of uranium mining. The Federal Opposition Leader, Kevin Rudd, believes the policy must change. Labor frontbencher Stephen Conroy says he expects the party's national conference to scrap the Australian Labor Party's (ALP) long standing policy. Senator Conroy says it is likely to be voted out at next month's national conference. "The sense I get from the delegates that I talk to is that there'll be a majority in favour of the change," he said. "I think both Kim Beazley and Kevin Rudd have come out in favour of it and I think there'll be a majority in favour of change. "I'm weighing up my position at the moment and I'll be considering the arguments and I'm looking forward to the debate at the ALP National Conference." Labor's environment spokesman Peter Garrett says he still opposes an expansion of uranium mining in Australia. "Clearly the three mine policy has meant that we have existing mines in place," he said. "They will continue. "The question is whether or not we're going to see an expansion of uranium mining and I'm opposed to expanding uranium mining just as I'm opposed to nuclear energy and increasing nuclear activities in Australia." The Northern Territory's Chief Minister has reaffirmed her support for changing Labor's "no new uranium mine" policy. Clare Martin wants to change the policy in favour of every mine being judged on its merits. However, she says using the uranium for a nuclear power industry in Australia is a different story. "They are two very different issues, what the Labor party is dealing with at its national conference and what we're talking about today is whether we want to continue with the "no new mines" policy or whether we should be doing a case by case judgement against very strict guidelines," she said. The Acting Queensland Premier, Anna Bligh, says some of her concerns over uranium mining in the state have been allayed, but she still has some reservations. Mr Beattie is overseas on a trade mission, but has released a report showing uranium mining would not threaten the state's massive coal exports. He says that has persuaded him to overturn his opposition to uranium mining and instead support a scrapping of the "no new mines" policy at the ALP's National Conference next month. Ms Bligh says she has long-held environmental and safety concerns. "I think what you'll see from the conference and certainly I think there is a mood emerging that if there is any change to the policy, there needs to be a great deal of protection and caveats around that," she said. "I don't think, even if there's a change, we're about to see any open slather activity. "Do I think that it is likely that we will see some change to the policy? Increasingly, yes." Meanwhile, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) is warning Labor will lose votes if it overturns its opposition to uranium mining. The AMWU's Andrew Dettmer says he is very disappointed in the Queensland Premier. "Uranium mining can't be sustained and supported for the simple fact it is not safe, it is not safe environmentally or many other ways," he said. "The fact is the residue of uranium mining, which is nuclear waste, has a half-life of 37,000 years, well beyond the time of Mr Beattie's premiership." Beattie changes tune on uranium mining ***************************************************************** 48 AU ABC: Beattie backs down on uranium mining ABC Queensland 16:36 (ACDT)Friday, 23 March 2007. 14:36 (AWDT) Environmentalists say Queensland Premier Peter Beattie has broken a key election promise by deciding to support uranium mining. Mr Beattie's back down comes after he received a report indicating uranium mining would not threaten the state's coal industry. Labor is expected to drop its "no new mines" policy at next month's Australian Labor Party (ALP) national conference. But Toby Hutchin from the Queensland Conservation Council says it is the wrong move. "There is a very broad community opposed to uranium mining," Mr Hutchin said. "More recent polls suggest that around about 78 per cent [of] ALP voters oppose the expansion of uranium mining so the ALP really needs to think very carefully about this," he said. ***************************************************************** 49 ENS: Public Hearing: First U.S. Mixed Plutonium-Uranium Fuel Plant Environment News Service (ENS) AmeriScan: March 22, 2007 WASHINGTON, DC The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is allowing the public to request a hearing on a proposed license for Shaw Areva MOX Services to operate a mixed-oxide, MOX, fuel fabrication facility at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina. Shaw Areva, formerly known as Duke, Cogema, Stone & Webster, submitted its application for the operating license last September 27 and supplemented it November 7. The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the agency to begin its detailed technical review. The applicant submitted a non-proprietary version of the application, which may be viewed on the NRC website by clicking here. Normally, the technical review and the opportunity to request a hearing would have been announced at the end of December. However, because the federal government was operating under a continuing resolution that fixed spending at Fiscal Year 2006 levels, those actions were delayed. Now that the NRC has received its funding for FY 2007, the review will proceed. NRC staff will hold a public meeting April 12 in Aiken, South Carolina, to discuss the technical review process and the opportunity for members of the public to request an adjudicatory hearing. Details of the meeting will be announced closer to that date. The MOX facility will be owned by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. It is part of a bilateral effort between the United States and Russia to convert supplies of surplus weapons-grade plutonium into more proliferation resistant forms by blending it with uranium for use as fuel in nuclear power plants. The NRC issued a construction authorization for the facility March 30, 2005. During that licensing review, the NRC staff completed an Environmental Impact Statement on the construction and operation of the proposed facility. That report and information on various public meetings held regarding the MOX facility is online here. The deadline for requesting a hearing is May 14. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest may be affected by the license and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101 or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2006. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 50 Las Vegas SUN: Editorial: Beware: Yucca not dead Today: March 23, 2007 at 8:24:46 PDT The lifeblood of this nuclear waste burial plan, federal money, is still flowing Many horror movies reach their climax when the monster - human or otherwise - finally appears to have been killed but attacks again as people gather around to make sure. Could this be the case in Nevada's real-life horror story called Yucca Mountain? Our story began in 1978 when federal scientists, responding to complaints from managers of the nation's nuclear power plants, began eyeing Yucca Mountain as a potential burial site for the plants' deadly nuclear waste. In page-turner style, with Congress and President Reagan emerging as central characters, Yucca Mountain was singled out as the only site in the country to be studied for its potential to hold, virtually for an eternity, 77,000 tons of radioactive material. With the mountain located just 90 miles northwest of fast-growing Las Vegas, the issue became a monster. But today, after successfully battling the project for more than 20 years, many leading Nevadans are calling it dead. Las Vegas Sun reporter Lisa Mascaro, in a story this week, however, quoted Yucca experts who cautioned that it is not time for people to start gathering around just yet. Yucca lives, and could just lash out again. Although the project has taken innumerable direct hits on safety issues, it is still drawing breath in the form of half-a-billion dollars a year from the federal budget. Comments such as those made last week by outgoing Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner Jeffrey Merrifield show why Nevadans should not get complacent. The Energy Department, owing to safety issues raised by Nevada, has so far missed its deadlines to file an application with the commission for approval to operate Yucca Mountain. Even if the department misses its next deadline, set for June 2008, a "Plan B" could emerge, showcasing a new management scheme involving a "public-private" partnership, Merrifield told Mascaro. Nevada must stay vigilant, as the federal government seems intent on proceeding, however slowly, with a Yucca Mountain dump despite all of the dangers posed by transportation and geologic storage. Scientists say storing the waste on-site - at the nuclear power plants where it is produced - in dry casks will be a safe alternative for at least the next 100 years. In our view, Congress should redirect the money now going to Yucca Mountain to that alternative. Only when Yucca's funding is shut down completely will it be safe to finally call this project dead. All contents © 1996 - 2007 Las Vegas Sun, Inc. ***************************************************************** 51 Las Vegas SUN: Q+A: Joe Biden (Yucca) Today: March 23, 2007 at 6:54:36 PDT Unions, Yucca Mountain on candidate's radar By Michael J. Mishak Las Vegas Sun Joe Biden is not the kind of guy to dodge the public stage. So it was with good reason that Biden, the senior senator from Delaware and one of seven Democratic presidential contenders, canceled a trip to Nevada on Wednesday. Biden was scheduled to speak to labor leaders and party activists at two events in Carson City, but he said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid requested that he stay in Washington for budget votes. Family commitments will keep him away from Saturday's presidential health care forum at UNLV. Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, spoke with the Sun by telephone about Nevada issues. Q: How do you think you will do in Nevada? Nevada is good for me. I have a natural constituency with the people likely to participate in the caucuses: organized labor. I have a 34-year record with labor that can't be surpassed by anybody in either party this time out. Whether I get the endorsements or not, I'm confident that I'll do well with labor voters. Have you put down any roots here yet? We've hired people, but we're waiting a few weeks so that we can roll out everything as a complete package, headquarters and all. Danny O'Brien, my national political director, is a big help. He's got a lot of experience with Nevada campaigns and knows a lot of people. But it's not the same as having Harry Reid's son. (Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid is working on Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign.) What's your understanding of Western issues? I've been deeply involved with Yucca Mountain over the years. I'm aware of the water issues - how rapid development is sucking up all the resources. There's also what we call the sagebrush rebellion issues - federal lands, guns and open space. But right now there's no distinction between the questions I'm asked in Jackson, Miss., and the ones I'm asked in Carson City, Nev. Everyone is consumed with the knowledge that we've been dug into a pretty deep hole, and they're looking for someone with a depth and breadth of national security experience, not just to deal with Iraq but with what's going to be a dangerous decade ahead. Given Southern Nevada's explosive growth, should the Colorado River Compact be reformed? We've had similar distribution issues with the Delaware River in my home state, but it's a much bigger problem for Nevada. In order to get a fundamental change and the federal government engaged, it needs to start with state negotiations. How would you deal with the nation's health care crisis? I would move immediately to insure all children under age 18, modernize medical records and provide catastrophic health insurance to lift the burden on the 46 million people who can't afford coverage. I would also encourage states to move toward total health care coverage, and I'd have the federal government give them much more leeway in underwriting the cost. The way to get a national consensus for a major health care policy is to cherry pick the best ideas from the dozens of states doing their own. Are you a gambling man? No. I play nickel, dime and quarter poker games with my old buddies. I've found that I usually gamble with my future rather than gamble with my money. I like Las Vegas for the shows more than the slots. Michael J. Mishak can be reached at 259-2347 or at michael.mishak@lasvegassun.com. All contents © 1996 - 2007 Las Vegas Sun, Inc. ***************************************************************** 52 BBC NEWS: Australia set for uranium rethink Last Updated: Friday, 23 March 2007, 13:29 GMT Australia, sitting on the world's largest uranium reserves, looks set to build more mines New uranium mines could be built in Australia after a 24-year ban. Australia has 40% of world uranium reserves, but mining is currently allowed only in two of Australia's eight states and territories. But state-level governments elsewhere banned new mines in 1983, amid wide public support and worries about nuclear proliferation. Queensland Premier Peter Beattie - till now one of the staunchest opponents of expanding uranium mining, not least because of concerns about the impact on the state's coal-mining industry - is now shifting his position. "Mr Beattie changed his position after receiving a report that said uranium mining would not harm the state's coal industry," his spokeswoman told Reuters news agency. Any exports could only go to countries which had signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, as China did last year, she added. South Australia and the Northern Territory currently permit uranium mining, but mineral-rich Queensland and Western Australia have to date continued their opposition. * BBC Copyright Notice ***************************************************************** 53 Carlsbad Current-Argus: Nuclear expert: Be factual, ethical (GNEP) By Kyle Marksteiner Article Launched: 03/22/2007 10:16:53 PM MDT CARLSBAD ? Remain ethical and stick to the facts ? that was the advice given by national nuclear expert Harold McFarlane to a group of mostly fellow nuclear enthusiasts at a talk Thursday in Carlsbad. McFarlane is the president of the American Nuclear Society. He's also the deputy associate laboratory director for nuclear programs with Idaho National Laboratory. His Thursday presentation took place at the Stevens Inn in front of about 25 people, most of them scientists affiliated with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The American Nuclear Society has recently issued a statement supporting the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership. A spot between Carlsbad and Hobbs is one of 11 locations being considered for a nuclear reprocessing center and an advanced burner reactor related to the GNEP project. GNEP, McFarlane said, was designed under the assumption that there will be a global surge in energy application. McFarlane's presentation included quite a bit of "how-to" advice for advocating the nuclear industry, both in general and as related to GNEP. He presented a slide evaluating the public participation at GNEP scoping meetings held at potential sites around the nation. The evaluation included recording how many people spoke at each meeting, how many were opposed to a GNEP proposal and a general summary of the overall tempo of each meeting. The conclusion, McFarlane noted, was that the majority of people who spoke at the meetings spoke in favor of increasing the amount of energy derived from nuclear power. "When these facilities are sited, we're going to have to have national support or we won't have it at all," he said. Supporters of nuclear energy will likely feel passionate about the issue, McFarlane said, cautioning, "but don't get lost in enthusiasm." McFarlane urged ANS members to be ethical, honest and factual while debating nuclear issues. Opponents are thinking rationally, he said, and ANS members should be careful to not get lured into hypothetical "what-if" scenarios. "In spite of what they say, it's good for everyone, and it will work," he said of nuclear energy. Part of McFarlane's presentation included information on why the ANS believes expanding the nuclear industry is essential. Countries such as China and India are forecasting dramatic accelerated energy needs. Increased coal consumption will increase the amount of potentially dangerous greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. Nuclear energy, however, produces a limited amount of waste. "But it's certainly a lot better than storing your waste in your atmosphere," McFarlane said. The nuclear industry is also much safer than most industries, even including the real estate and insurance industries, he noted. But McFarlane was generally preaching to the nuclear choir, so to speak, and he also included a general evaluation of the history of nuclear energy in the United States. The nation's "nuclear slumber," he noted, did involve a reduction in reactors, but the reactors being used are continuing to produce more and more energy due to technology improvements. There has also been a recent upswing in the number of undergraduate students in nuclear fields at American universities, he said, but not yet with graduate students. While many European nations rely on nuclear for a higher percentage of their energy needs than the United States, a larger percentage of American citizens say they support nuclear energy when compared with other nations. One possible hope for nuclear advocates is for the United States to have 30 percent of its net electricity come from nuclear sources by 2030. "It would be a huge lift for the country," McFarlane said. "But not impossible." McFarlane also fielded a host of questions from members of the audience. He was asked if concerns about global warming should be used as a reason for advocating nuclear energy; what the Idaho National Laboratory and ANS are doing to advocate nuclear energy; what education initiatives are taking place; and whether a dirty bomb incident could spark another anti-nuclear push similar to the reaction to Three Mile Island. A Carlsbad scientist will discuss the role of nuclear energy in the country's future economic growth and national security at a presentation Monday. Jim Conca, head of the Carlsbad Environmental Monitoring and Research Center, will speak at noon in the Skeen-Whitlock building auditorium. Conca's presentation will focus on the role of nuclear power in achieving a sustainable energy distribution by 2040.By Kyle Marksteiner Current-Argus Staff Writer Copyright © 2005 Carlsbad Current Argus, a MediaNews Group ***************************************************************** 54 Ruidoso News: Hearing set on nuclear proposal (GNEP) Deanna Cheney For the Ruidoso News Article Launched: 03/22/2007 08:51:59 PM MDT Would visitors headed to Ruidoso from Texas via Highway 380 be "put off" by the prospect of driving past a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant to get here? Would perceptions about southeastern New Mexico as a tourist destination change in the event nuclear waste is transported to and from the area, stored and recycled here? How might the safety of residents, roadways and rail routes in Lincoln County be affected by such a development? Answers to these questions and others may come Wednesday when proponents of a reprocessing center in Roswell visit Ruidoso to give an overview of plant plans as they relate to the president's Global Nuclear Energy Policy (GNEP). The meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. inside the Ruidoso Convention Center and is to include a PowerPoint presentation and question-and-answer session with site promoters Gandy-Marley, Inc. and EnergySolutions. L. Ray Nunley, mayor of Ruidoso, said he will attend. I don't know what all the parameters are on this project but would like to learn more," he said. "This is an important issue." County Manager Tom Stew-art said he looks forward to the presentation. "If it's going in east of Roswell our concern is transportation routes and safety," Stewart said. "As long as hazardous wastes are stored in Carlsbad at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant that's one thing. But when they start coming through our community, that's another." Should Roswell be selected by the federal government as the site for the reprocessing of nuclear fuel, touted by nuclear advocates as "next generation technology," the county and communities located along transportation routes should see funding for highway and road improvements and for safety training, Stewart said. At the same time, city administrators will want to plan ahead for dealing with public perception. Steve Tally, Ruidoso's newly appointed director of tourism, said he plans to participate in next week's discussion and encourages operators of hospitality venues also to attend and to help advise his office. "On initial blush I would be concerned about the tourism aspect of the proposal," he said." Brad Treptow, director of the Ruidoso Valley Chamber of Commerce, said that while he offers no opinion on the efficacy of reprocessing nuclear fuel, what differentiates the Roswell proposal from WIPP is location. "With Carlsbad, the plant is far enough off the main highway that I don't think tourists know it is there let alone think about it," Treptow told the Ruidoso News. On the other hand, Treptow said new jobs for construction and operation of a plant could result in more visitors to Ruidoso out of Roswell. Alan Dobson, a spent fuel management specialist with EnergySolutions, said up to 10,000 people may be employed in the design and construction of a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant with construction to last about six years beginning around 2010. Some 5,000 people may be employed to operate the plant, to be located 40 miles east of Roswell just off U.S. 380, ranging in pay from $40,000 in today's dollars to $100,000. He said the hiring of technical staff will require the relocation of many with higher educations and disposable income. "This could be good for the entire economy of the region," Dobson surmised. Jimi Gadzia, a former member of the state Environmental Improvement Board, said fuel reprocessing is government subsidized and expensive. He cautions, "Waste attracts waste" and is hazardous to the environment. "Southeastern New Mexico is already on its way to getting the reputation of being the radioactive dumpsite of the nation because of waste disposal at WIPP and at Eunice," he said. In addition, taxpayers will foot the bill associated with reprocessing. Already $1.1 million has been awarded to Gandy-Marley, Inc. for a site study in Roswell and an additional $250 million is to be funded this year by the federal government nationwide to conduct evaluations at 10 other prospective plant sites and to study further and float the GNEP concept. Gadzia said Ruidosoans should question how much waste the Roswell site will take in from reactors not only in the U.S. but in Mexico and other partner countries, and how much water might be needed to operate the plant. "The old process took 1 million acre feet of water per year," Gadzia alleges. "Where will the water come from for the new plant?" According to the U.S. Department of Energy, spent nuclear fuel has been piling up at sites around the U.S. since the 1950s when the first reactors were built, and at last count totaled about 50,000 metric tons. The DOE has said at current levels that waste can be recycled to power America "carbon-free" for decades, perhaps even centuries to come, while at the same time minimizing amounts requiring disposal. Mike Marley, a principal with Gandy-Marley, Inc., said that although his group is not required under the guidelines of their site study to engage Ruidoso in discussion, it has opted to do so as a courtesy. The Marley family ranches and farms in Chaves County and in Lincoln County near Hondo and Capitan. They lease acre-age near Arabela. Following the 1 p.m. informational meeting, site promoters will hold a 6 p.m. hearing at the Roswell Convention and Civic Center, where a transcriptionist will record remarks for the public record. The DOE intends to announce its recommendation for location of the nation's "first" nuclear fuel reprocessing plant in summer 2008. Copyright © 2006 Ruidoso News, a MediaNews Group Newspaper. ***************************************************************** 55 FR NRC: Request for a License To Import Radioactive Waste Doc E7-5336 [Federal Register: March 23, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 56)] [Notices] [Page 13828] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr23mr07-127] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Pursuant to 10 CFR 110.70(C) ``Public notice of receipt of an application,'' please take notice that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received the following request for an import license. Copies of the request are available electronically through ADAMS and can be accessed through the Public Electronic Reading Room (PERR) link http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html at the NRC Homepage. A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene may be filed within 30 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Any request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene shall be served by the requestor or petitioner upon the applicant, the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; and the Executive Secretary, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The information concerning this import license application follows. NRC Import License Application ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of applicant, date of Description of material application, date received, ------------------------------------------ End use Country of application No. docket No. Material type Total quantity origin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Westinghouse Electric Company Contaminated Mississauga is All materials are Canada. LLC, February 28, 2007, March materials (waste required to return to be disposed of 1, 2007, IW021, 11005674. filter cake and up to 74,843.0 at the Energy shot) generated by kilograms of Solutions of Utah Mississauga Metals filter cake and site located in & Alloys in 122,470.0 Clive, Utah in Ontario, Canada kilograms of shot, accordance with from the which it expects an existing decontamination of to generate from agreement between steel received the the parties. from the Hematite decontamination facility in process. It is Festus, MO under expected that NRC License XW003. these materials will be contaminated with up to 3.506 kilograms uranium- 235 contained in up to a total of 72.288 kilograms of uranium with a maximum enrichment of 4.9 weight percent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this 13th day of March 2007 at Rockville, Maryland. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Margaret M. Doane, Deputy Director, Office of International Programs. [FR Doc. E7-5336 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 56 Namibia Economist: Russia pledges to help Namibia develop nuclear energy Written by Staff Reporters Friday, 23 March 2007 Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov said this week that his country is ready to help Namibia develop its uranium deposits to generate nuclear energy in the country, Namibian Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) radio reported. Fradkov said during a meeting with President Hifikepunye Pohamba last weekend that Russia was prepared to go into joint ventures with Namibia in the development of uranium mines and nuclear energy. Fradkov said Russia was considering the construction of mini-plants and floating nuclear power plants that would use uranium. “We are quite prepared to avert the looming energy crisis in your country by jointly developing uranium deposits in your country,” said Fradkov. Pohamba said the development of nuclear energy plants in Namibia would help solve an impending power crisis in the entire southern African region. Namibia is home to Rio Tinto owned Rossing Uranium and Langer Heinrich, which is owned by Paladin Resources. Pohamba officially opened this mine last week. Pohamba said, at the opening of the Paladin mine, that Namibia advocates the use of uranium for peaceful purposes in countries to where the country’s yellow cake is exported. He said the country would be willing and ready to explore those options at home. Namibia, which accounts for about 8% of the world's uranium production, is expected to increase its annual output to between 12% and 14 % with the opening of the Langer Heinrich mine, said Director of Mines in the Ministry of Mines and Energy, Erasmus Shivolo in August last year. Fourteen firms are currently exploring for uranium in the country. © 2007 The Namibia Economist ***************************************************************** 57 NAS: Project: Medical Isotope Production Without Highly Enriched Uranium PIN: NRSB-O-06-01-A Major Unit: Division on Earth and Life Studies Sub Unit: Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board RSO: Crowley, Kevin Subject/Focus Area: Project Scope The National Academies will conduct a study and provide findings and recommendations to the Department of Energy on the production of medical isotopes without highly enriched uranium. As mandated by Congress in Section 630 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 [See Section 630(A) in Attachment 1], the study will determine the following: 1. The feasibility of procuring supplies of medical isotopes from commercial sources that do not use highly enriched uranium, using the definition of feasibility defined in Section 630 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. [See Section 603(B) in Attachment 1.] 2. The current and projected demand and availability of medical isotopes in regular current domestic use. 3. The progress that is being made by the Department of Energy and others to eliminate all use of highly enriched uranium in reactor fuel, reactor targets, and medical isotope production facilities. 4. The potential cost differential in medical isotope production in the reactors and target processing facilities if the products were derived from production systems that do not involve fuels and targets with highly enriched uranium. If the National Academies determines that the procurement of medical isotopes from commercial sources is not feasible as defined in Section 630 of the Energy Policy Act, it should estimate the magnitude of the cost differential and identify additional steps that could be taken by the Department of Energy and medical isotope producers to improve the feasibility of such conversions. In estimating the magnitude of cost differentials, consideration should be given to facilities utilized by both large and small producers. The National Academies should also identify any reliability of supply issues that could arise as a result of such conversions. This project is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration The start date for the project is 9/25/2006. A report will be issued at the completion of the project. Project Duration: 24 months Provide FEEDBACK on this project. Contact the Public Access Records Office to make an inquiry or to schedule an appointment to view project materials available to the public. Committee Membership Meeting 1 - 02/15/2007 Meeting 2 - 04/10/2007 Reports having no URL can be seen at the Public Access Records Office Email: info@nas.edu ***************************************************************** 58 IAEA: Talks Proceed on Proposed International Uranium Enrichment Centre Web IAEA.org Fact-Finding Discussions in Russia Focus on Site in Siberia Staff Report 22 March 2007 IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei has proposed putting enrichment under multinational control to assure supplies of nuclear fuel and to reduce proliferation risks. Nuclear fuel pellets at a fabrication plant. (Photo: D. Calma/IAEA) Fact-finding talks between experts from the IAEA and Russia to explore the establishment of an international uranium enrichment centre in Siberia have ended with a joint agreement to set up a working group and continue developing the proposal. The discussions were held this month in Siberia at the headquarters of the Angarsk Electrolysis Chemical Complex, a manufacturer of low-enriched uranium - the fuel for nuclear power plants - that Russia is proposing should be the site of an international centre. After the talks ended in Angarsk 18 March, IAEA Deputy Director General Yury Sokolov told a press conference that the Agency’s main point of concern about proposals discussed with Russia was provision of a mechanism that would ensure that States cut off for political reasons continue to receive nuclear fuel. Russian officials told the press conference that the talks had made positive progress. Russia is currently in negotiations with Kazakhstan to establish a joint enrichment facility at the Angarsk complex, which is north of Irkutsk in south eastern Siberia. Both Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General of the IAEA, and Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, have proposed putting enrichment under multinational control to reduce proliferation risks. The system would provide assurance of supply to States considering developing nuclear power and avoid the need for them to build their own nuclear fuel production capability. The so-called front end of the nuclear fuel cycle, when fuel is enriched, as well as the back end - the reprocessing of spent fuel - provides points that pose proliferation risks because material can be potentially diverted and used to produce weapons. A cornerstone of Dr. ElBaradei´s proposal is a fuel bank of last resort that would offer users of the system the insurance of guaranteed delivery if their regular supplies were interrupted. In September 2006, a donation of US $50 million was made to the proposed fuel bank by the Nuclear Threat Initiative, provided by the US billionaire Warren Buffet, with the provision that the contribution is matched by an amount of $100 million. The inititatives to develop international uranium enrichment centres are being proposed amid a revival of interest in nuclear power as a means of generating electricity and fears about the proliferation of nuclear weapons. A paper about assurance of supply is to be presented by the Director General to the next meeting of the IAEA´s Board of Governors in June. Copyright ©, International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 100, Wagramer Strasse 5, A-1400 Vienna, Austria Telephone (+431) 2600-0; Facsimilie (+431) 2600-7; E-mail: ***************************************************************** 59 AU ABC: Labor's uranium policy set to change The World Today - Friday, 23 March , 2007 12:34:00 Reporter: Chris Uhlmann ELEANOR HALL: Pressure is mounting inside the Federal Labor Party for it to abandon its 'no new mines' uranium policy. Labor's National Development Spokesman Senator Chris Evans and Queensland Premier Peter Beattie have both undergone public conversions to the cause of expanding uranium mining and it now looks likely that Opposition leader Kevin Rudd will win the debate for change at the party's convention next month. But the Labor Party continues to oppose any use of nuclear power, as Chief Political Correspondent Chris Uhlmann reports. CHRIS UHLMANN: Australia has more than a third of the world's uranium reserves but much of it remains untapped because of a decision made by the Labor Party in 1983. That limited mining to three sites in the Northern Territory and South Australia. Although the Federal Government supports the development of the industry, state Labor Governments toeing the party line have prevented mines opening in Queensland and Western Australia. Opposition leader Kevin Rudd wants the party to abandon its opposition to new uranium mines at its conference next month and there are signs of change afoot. Queensland Premier Peter Beattie has reportedly made a spectacular backflip uranium mining, and a leading figure in the party's left has joined him. Chris Evans is Labor's leader in the Senate and Shadow Minister for National Development. CHRIS EVANS: This policy hasn't worked, and it won't work, so we need to abandon it. CHRIS UHLMANN: Although change looks likely, any expansion of uranium mining will be staunchly opposed by many of the rank and file and high-profile party members like Environment Spokesman Peter Garrett. PETER GARRETT: I think we're into nuclear including uranium mining, as far as we need to be in this country, and I'll continue to oppose a change as we head up to conference and in the debate. CHRIS UHLMANN: How does it work logically to support three mines but no expansion of mining? PETER GARRETT: Well, the three mine policy's already in place Chris. The question is whether it's going to go and be replaced by something else, which would see an expansion of uranium mining is to expanding nuclear activities overall. CHRIS UHLMANN: Would you like to see mining shut down completely? PETER GARRETT: No, I think that clearly the 'three mine' policy has meant that we have existing mines in place. They will continue. The question is whether or not we're actually going to see an expansion of uranium mining, and I'm opposed to expanding uranium mining, just as I'm opposed to nuclear energy and increasing nuclear activities in Australia. CHRIS UHLMANN: Do you feel that you're on the losing side of this debate at the moment, that it looks likely that Kevin Rudd will get his way? PETER GARRETT: Well, you never say never in politics, as in life, mate. We will continue to argue strongly the view that we believe is an important one, and we will continue to argue that all the way up to conference. CHRIS UHLMANN: Some Labor MPs, like South Australia's Steve Georganas, remain opposed to more mining but are prepared to switch sides if they hear some convincing arguments for change. STEVE GEORGANAS: The current policy is serving us, has been serving us well. I also think that many people are very sceptic about expanding our uranium, current uranium mining, and I personally think that, and I'm not convinced that expanding uranium mining is in the best interests of the country at this point of time. CHRIS UHLMANN: Are you open to being convinced by someone? STEVE GEORGANAS: Look, I certainly am, and certainly as politicians you always have to have an open mind, and as I said, at this point, I've yet to be convinced. CHRIS UHLMANN: Industry Minister Ian MacFarlane has welcomed the change of heart by Peter Beattie and Senator Evans but says it will be meaningless unless Kevin Rudd pushes state leaders to allow mining. IAN MACFARLANE: Well, any decision made by the ALP at its conference has to be agreed to and supported by all Labor leaders. So, it won't be enough for Kevin Rudd to steamroll the opposition at a Federal level amongst the Labor Party to uranium mining. He has to get people like Alan Carpenter and Peter Beattie to agree to go home to their states and say we are prepared to start mining uranium now. And Kevin Rudd has also got to support the opening up of ports in Australia for the export of uranium. CHRIS UHLMANN: And, no matter what happens on uranium mining, Labor will continue to be utterly opposed to any use of nuclear power in Australia, a position the Government paints as illogical. It is also baffles some others, like Greg Rudd, a lobbyist who spoke a uranium industry conference in Adelaide yesterday. He's also Kevin Rudd's brother. GREG RUDD: Uranium. Can you be half pregnant? Can you mine from three mines, and somehow retain a sense of moral purity, but lose that purity if you mine from 10 mines? Uranium. Can you mine and export uranium, knowing it is going to be used in nuclear power plants overseas, but take no responsibility for the waste derived from the uranium you export? Uranium. Should we value add in Australia? Should we develop our own nuclear industry and supply the world with our skill set? Should we have our own nuclear power stations as part of the climate change solution? Many questions, and a multitude of answers, facts and disinformation on all sides. ELEANOR HALL: And that's Greg Rudd, the political lobbyist and brother of Opposition leader Kevin Rudd, ending that report from Chris Uhlmann. ***************************************************************** 60 AU ABC: Public changing view on nuclear, says industry The World Today - Friday, 23 March , 2007 12:42:00 Reporter: Nance Haxton ELEANOR HALL: The uranium industry says public support is building for uranium as an alternative energy source in Australia. Industry representatives at a uranium conference in Adelaide today have said that global demand for uranium is set to soar, as Nance Haxton reports. NANCE HAXTON: To get a picture of global demand for uranium, one only has to look at the number of nuclear reactors around the world. The World Nuclear Association says that there are 435 nuclear reactors currently in operation, with 28 reactors under construction, and another 64 in the planning stage. Nuclear power produces 15 per cent of the world's electricity and operates in 31 countries. It's this kind of demand that drives PepinNini Minerals director Norman Kennedy to keep looking for potential uranium sites in Australia, as well as capitalise on its current exploration sites in South Australia and Queensland. NORMAN KENNEDY: I think all countries are very, very worried about how they're going to supply their nuclear-powered stations in the future. Personally, the amount of interest I had, I don't think that there is anywhere near the supply there at the moment to satisfy that. NANCE HAXTON: Mr Kennedy says even with the pending expansion of Olympic Dam mine in South Australia's north potentially making Australia the largest supplier of uranium in the world; it won't be enough to meet the growing global demand. NORMAN KENNEDY: We'll certainly have an effect on the market, I presume, at that time. But if you're looking at 2015 plus, maybe, for that affecting the market, the next 10 years or eight to 10 years, are extremely important. There is a really big shortfall. And where we're looking at, with the Chinese, we're looking at getting our project in production within three years, and we'll have the benefit of that particular time. Personally, I don't think that even Olympic Dam coming on stream, and Cigar Lake, and some of the big mines will really have much effect. There is so much demand, and so much proposed expansion in the nuclear industry, that everything will just be soaked up. NANCE HAXTON: And Mr Kennedy says he believes the Australian public is becoming more open to nuclear energy NORMAN KENNEDY: It's gone far quicker than I thought. When we first floated PepinNini, we didn't mention our uranium prospects because it just wasn't something we talked about. I'm from the generation that had some, a lot of fear about uranium, and really a lack of understanding. It's been a very, very big learning curve for me, and it's gone, and been accepted by the public and the politicians far quicker than what I imagined. ELEANOR HALL: And that's Nance Haxton reporting from the uranium conference in Adelaide. ***************************************************************** 61 AU ABC: Pepininni's to open mine pending scrapping of Labor's uranium policy. 24/03/2007. ABC News Online A South Australian uranium company is planning to set up Australia's fifth uranium mine, 100 kilometres west of Broken Hill. Pepininni Minerals says it plans to start production at the Croker Well deposit within three years. Much of the mine's resource would go to China as Pepininni has entered a joint venture with Chinese Government-owned company SinoSteel. Pepininni's general manager Phil Sutherland says SinoSteel is committing $30 million to the $160 million project. "The Chinese Government has signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and other safeguards required by the Australian Government so the application by China of Australian uranium and uranium from this project will be very very closely monitored," he said. Mr Sutherland says the mine will not go ahead until Labor scraps its 'no new uranium mines' policy. "Well of course it is subject to the Labor Party changing its policy at its policy platform convention in Sydney at the end of April as you'd appreciate most Labor governments are currently governed by this policy." ***************************************************************** 62 Brandon Sun: Nuclear board orders Cameco to control emissions at uranium mill Friday, March 23rd, 2007 Canadian Press OTTAWA (CP) - The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission has ordered Cameco Corp. (TSX:CCO) to reduce releases of selenium and molybdenum from its Key Lake, Sask., uranium mill. This decision to amend Cameco's licence followed a one-day public hearing in January in Ottawa. The licence now requires Cameco to "implement a three-phase action plan" which will be monitored by commission staff, the regulator said Friday. The revised licence "will make adequate provision for the protection of the environment, the health and safety of persons, and the maintenance of national security and measures required to implement international obligations to which Canada has agreed." © Copyright 2006 Brandon Sun All Rights Reserved. The Brandon Sun is a divison of FP Newspaper Group. 501 Rosser Avenue, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada, R7A 0K4 Ewan Pow, Publisher ***************************************************************** 63 Ventura County Star: Halaco cleanup could take years EPA official says that Superfund listing not equal to speedy work By Scott Hadly, shadly@VenturaCountyStar.com March 23, 2007 Even if Halaco is included on a list of Superfund sites this year, the cleanup of slag laden with metals and radioactive isotopes the bankrupt company left behind near Ormond Beach could take more than a decade, according to an official from the Environmental Protection Agency. At a meeting Thursday Wayne Praskin, the EPA's project manager for its Superfund Program in the western United States, told members of the Ormond Beach Task force that remediation of hazardous waste at Superfund sites takes 11 years on average. That doesn't mean that dealing with the 40-acre Halaco site would take that long, but Praskin seemed to want to temper expectations of the three dozen people at the meeting ? many of whom have been waiting decades for action. Praskin used the meeting, attended by members of the task force as well as Ventura County Supervisor Kathy Long and a representative of Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, and several state agencies, to fill people in on the process for inclusion in the National Priorities List, referred to as Superfund. Payment, disposal are issues For many in attendance, the main issue was whether the former owners would pay for the cleanup and whether the waste would be hauled away and the area restored. That will be determined during the assessment period, Praskin said. There is also likely to be some kind of survey to determine if pollution from the site caused any adverse health problems for the workers or neighbors, he said. If the site is listed, an assessment would be made of the potential environmental and health risks presented by the estimated 750,000 cubic yards of waste built up over 40 years of operations there. Halaco halted operations in 2004, leaving behind a slag heap covering 28 acres, four stories high in spots. The waste includes elevated levels of lead, arsenic, barium, cadmium, aluminium, magnesium and beryllium. The waste also is sprinkled with radioactive isotopes like thorium and cesium. Two weeks ago, federal workers found some of that radioactive material along a berm near the wetlands next to the facility, resulting in the closure of the wetlands at the end of Perkins Road. On Thursday, crews scooped the last bits of radioactive material from the wetlands and moved it over to the waste pile, where it was buried. The wetlands will likely be open to the public again sometime next week. May have been there decades The gray material apparently got there in the late 1960s, when the company pumped its waste into the Oxnard Industrial Drain. For about a decade the company had a permit to recycle magnesium that included thorium alloys, which were used by the military and aerospace industry. It stopped accepting the material in the late 1970s, according to records. The EPA has been working at the site since February on a $4.5 million effort to stabilize the waste and ensure that it doesn't erode into the adjacent wetlands or the ocean. That work will be finished at the end of April, said Rob Wise, EPA's on-scene coordinator. 2006 © The E.W. Scripps Co. Ventura County Star subscription services Users of this site are subject to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement Contact VenturaCountyStar.com at Feedback@venturacountystar.com | Advertising ***************************************************************** 64 The Australian: WA Premier 'won't export uranium' * March 23, 2007 This story is from our news.com.au network Source: AAP WESTERN Australia may need to exploit its uranium deposits for its own energy needs in decades to come, but the state will not export uranium now, Premier Alan Carpenter said. Mr Carpenter said his opposition to uranium mining in WA was as strong as ever, despite Queensland Premier Peter Beattie backflipping by declaring his support for uranium mining in his state, and talk of the ALP dumping its "no new mines policy" at its national conference next month. “There will be no uranium mining in WA as long as I am Premier,” Mr Carpenter said. “There are just too many question marks and too many risks associated with uranium mining and nuclear energy at this point of time. “There is no doubt it would open the door for WA to become a dumping ground for the world's nuclear waste.” Mr Carpenter said it also made no sense for WA to export its uranium now, considering it might need it down the track. “In 50 odd years' time, if all the risks and concerns associated with nuclear power can be addressed, WA might then consider exploiting its uranium deposits for our own energy needs,” he said. “If we have got uranium, why don't we leave it until we need it and until it is likely that the issue of waste and how to deal with waste has been resolved safely?” The ALP appears certain to dump its policy of banning new uranium mines at its national conference next month, with the party's senate leader and resource-rich Queensland joining the chorus for change. But Mr Carpenter said any change in federal Labor's mines policy at next month's conference would have no impact on the WA Government. “No matter what Queensland does, or what South Australia does, we'll make our own decisions here in WA,” he said. © The Australian ***************************************************************** 65 Herald Sun: Another win for uranium | NEWS.com.au | March 24, 2007 12:00am THE Queensland Government's reluctant conversion to allow uranium mining has given another shot in the arm for the already soaring uranium industry. Premier Peter Beattie yesterday confirmed the change of heart after a government-commissioned report from the Sustainable Minerals Institute at the University of Queensland showed uranium mining would not threaten the state's multi-billion dollar coal industry. Queensland is also rich in uranium, with an estimated $3.2 billion in deposits. Mr Beattie had been a staunch defender of Labor's long-standing ban on more uranium mines because it would threaten the coal industry. The federal Labor Party is widely expected to change its long-held anti-nukes policy at its national conference next month. But addressing delegates at the Paydirt 2007 Uranium conference in Adelaide, Federal Resources Minister Ian Macfarlane said Labor's change of heart would mean little if the states, other than South Australia, failed to change their policies prohibiting new mines. However, exploring for uranium is still outlawed in Victoria and NSW. West Australian Premier Alan Carpenter has vowed there will be no uranium mining in WA in this parliamentary term. "If Kevin Rudd is going to change Labor Party policy in April, he needs to actually be fair dinkum about it," Mr Macfarlane said. "He actually needs the state premiers to say, 'OK, when we walk out of this conference we are going to go home and abolish the legislative restrictions on mining uranium'. "(SA Premier) Mike Rann is doing a good job in SA with uranium, he's had some courage there, but even he won't have any credibility, as national president of the ALP, if all of the Labor Party don't come out (in support of mining)." Mr Rann said he was pushing hard in support of BHP Billiton's proposed $6 billion Olympic Dam copper and uranium mine expansion and Mr Macfarlane was playing politics. "Ian McFarlane knows full well that I am working to change the ALP national policy to allow other uranium mines to go ahead," Mr Rann said. Mr Macfarlane said the industry was faced with a hotch-potch of regulations across the states which needed to be addressed. "In fact there would be few industries in Australia as inconsistently regulated as the uranium industry," Mr Macfarlane said.

"(For example) regulations governing the transport of uranium differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction," Mr Macfarlane said. "International transport guidelines ensure the safe transportation of uranium and radioactive material and yet the state premiers take the opportunity to grandstand and play tough by putting in their own rules and regulations. "If they were only duplicating legislation it would be fine -- you'd still have one set of rules, albeit on different letterheads. "But they prefer to pursue agendas of their own that only make life more complicated for no real benefit." Mr Macfarlane said uranium mining in Australia needed to be expanded. "It's good for Australia's future. We need to expand opportunities to mine uranium in Australia. "It provides jobs and export income. It provides uranium to customers under the strictest non-proliferation treaties and safeguards in the world and we need to see that uranium mining expand, not only here in SA, but in all states that have commercial deposits, particularly Queensland and WA." © Herald and Weekly Times. All times AEDT (GMT + 10). ***************************************************************** 66 AFP: US energy secretary says pipeline could help Iran build bomb - report Friday March 23, 09:34 PM NEW DELHI (AFP) - US Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman has called for the planned Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline to be abandoned, saying it could help Iran build nuclear weapons, according to a report on Friday. "There have been talks among Iran, India and other countries about finding ways of developing Iran's oil and gas assets," Bodman was quoted by the Hindu newspaper as saying. "If that is allowed to go forward, in our judgment, this will contribute to the development of nuclear weapons," Bodman told reporters, the Hindu said. "We need to stop this," Bodman said after attending a discussion on "Indo-US Nuclear Cooperation" organised by a business group in Mumbai, India's financial capital. India and Pakistan, despite being US allies in its global "war on terror," have said they want to go ahead with the the 2,600-kilometre (1,600-mile) Iranian pipeline project as they need energy to fuel economic growth. Bodman said he had conveyed US concern about the natural gas pipeline at the "highest level" to the Indian government, the newspaper said. But "we continue to work with the Indian government to finalise" a landmark nuclear deal between the United States and India allowing export of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, the energy secretary said. The nuclear deal was signed into law nearly three months ago by US President George W. Bush. "These two concerns (the pipeline and nuclear deal) operate in separate areas," Bodman said. Bodman's comments came as sponsors of a UN Security Council measure to reinforce sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program were ready to put it to a vote, likely on Saturday. The draft resolution would ban the Islamic republic from exporting arms and calls for voluntary trade sanctions, among other moves. Talks on the pipeline began in 1994 but stalled due to tensions between rivals Pakistan and India. Resumption of the discussions followed the start of a slow-moving peace process between the South Asian nations in 2004. The United States has been pushing for another pipeline to South Asian countries from Turkmenistan via Afghanistan. Washington accuses Tehran of supporting terrorism and trying to make a nuclear bomb. Iran plans to lay a pipeline from the giant South Pars gas field to carry 90 million standard cubic meters per day of gas. One third will be used by Iran while Pakistan and India will get another third each. Separately an Indian news agency reported differences between India and Pakistan over how much Islamabad wants to charge New Delhi for transporting the gas across Pakistani territory. However, Mukhtar Ahmad, energy advisor to Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz, said he was sure the dispute could be settled. "We are very hopeful we will converge on all the issues" and a tripartite deal will be signed in June, said Ahmad after talks with India's Petroleum Minister Murli Deora in New Delhi late on Thursday. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Australia & NZ Pty Limited. All rights ***************************************************************** 67 ContraCostaTimes.com: Program to screen former lab workers 03/23/2007 | By Betsy Mason CONTRA COSTA TIMES Former employees of Lawrence Livermore and Sandia/California National laboratories are eligible for free medical screening to determine if they have any health problems related to on-the-job exposure to radioactive or toxic substances. Experts from UC San Francisco and Boston University School of Public Health will evaluate workers at the Kaiser Permanente occupational medicine facilities in Northern California, starting with Livermore near the end of April. The program will spread to other cities with Kaiser occupational health facilities that are near clusters of retirees. "A lot of these folks may be older and we don't want them to have to drive too far," said program manager Elisa Rossetti. There are also plans to expand the program to include former Lawrence Berkeley lab workers in 2008. The screening program is one of several across the country funded by the Department of Energy as part of the Energy Employees Medical Monitoring Program. Lab workers may have done work that exposed them to radiation, asbestos, beryllium, silica, lead, lasers and other dangerous substances. Those who were exposed may be at risk for conditions including cancer, lung disease, hearing loss, chronic beryllium disease and asbestosis. A similar program has screened more than 4,500 former workers from the Nevada Test Site and found 20 percent of them had a work-related condition. "We are hoping to screen at least that many in California over the next several years," Rossetti said. The screening is free and confidential, but subsequent doctor visits and medical care are not covered. However, screeners can help workers find specialists or send the results of their tests to their personal doctors. Workers who have become ill from exposure can apply to a separate federal compensation program run by the Department of Labor to receive $150,000 and have their medical costs covered. Betsy Mason covers science and the national laboratories. Reach her at bmason@cctimes.com or 925-847-2158. FOR MORE INFORMATION ? Former DOE worker medical screening information: www.bu/edu/formerworker; 925-551-7844 or 925-551-7870, toll-free 866-460-0628 ? DOE sick worker compensation program information: 925-606-6302; Toll-free 866-606-6302; california.center@rrohio.com ***************************************************************** 68 Seattle Times: Chemical might keep radiation out of river Friday, March 23, 2007 - Page updated at 02:02 AM By The Associated Press RICHLAND Hanford nuclear reservation scientists will soon begin using a substance found in bones and teeth to stop radioactive contamination from reaching the Columbia River. After seven years of studies and successful tests last year, workers this spring will begin injecting calcium phosphate into the ground to prevent radioactive strontium from a defunct reactor from seeping into the river, state and federal officials said. Calcium phosphate is in bones and teeth. It binds to strontium and forms a crystal that holds the radioactive element in place until the radioactivity naturally decays. "It should keep it bound up for hundreds of years while the strontium decays away," said John Fruchter, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory program manager for the project. Within 90 years, about 90 percent of the radioactivity is gone, and within 270 years, radioactivity is within drinking water standards. Plans are to inject a 300-foot-long chemical barrier about 40 feet underground near the banks of the river where groundwater is contaminated with strontium. When the N Reactor was operating to produce electricity and plutonium for the nation's nuclear-weapons program, water used to cool the reactor was contaminated with strontium. Contamination remains in the soil between the reactor and the river and is carried by groundwater. Radioactive strontium is particularly dangerous to humans. Chemically similar to calcium, it is deposited in the bones, where it can release radiation for years. Strontium's similarity to calcium offered a promising cleanup solution, but only after scientists figured out a way to inject the chemical into the earth through wells without the phosphate and calcium binding up. If the chemicals were combined in solution, they would bind up in the pipe rather than spreading out each of 10 wells along the river, said geologist Mike Thompson. Instead, the calcium is mixed with citrate, which prevents it from binding with the phosphate immediately. Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company ***************************************************************** 69 Tri-City Herald: Hanford proposes landfill expansion Published Friday, March 23rd, 2007 By ANNETTE CARY, HERALD STAFF WRITER Washington Closure Hanford is preparing to expand Hanford's Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, the nuclear reservation's low-level radioactive waste landfill. It has awarded a $420,000 subcontract to Weaver Boos Consultants, a small Chicago business that provides environmental management services, to design the expansion. A request for proposals for construction and construction quality assurance is expected to be issued this spring. Construction is expected to cost about $12 million, and preference will be given to small businesses. To meet terms of its $1.9 billion contract, Washington Closure must expand the lined landfill from its current six cells -- or areas to receive waste -- to 10 cells. The landfill was designed to be expanded as needed. Each cell is 70 feet deep, 500 feet long and 500 feet wide. They are arranged in pairs, with each pair large enough to hold about 2.8 million tons of waste. Among waste excepted at the landfill is rubble from buildings that are being demolished and contaminated soil. The landfill opened in 1996 and the last expansion was completed in 2004. Weaver Boos plans a design similar to the other cells but with some revisions to simplify construction, according to Washington Closure. Instead of a two-sump leachate system, a single system will be designed. Also, synthetic material may replace gravel in one of the layers that forms the base of the landfill. The design should be completed by May and initial steps to begin construction, such as moving in trailers, could start in September. Construction on the first two cells should be completed by the end of 2009. © 2007 Tri-City Herald, Associated Press & Other Wire Services ***************************************************************** 70 Tri-City Herald: Lessons learned on vit plant Published Friday, March 23rd, 2007 ANNETTE CARY, HERALD STAFF WRITER Mistakes have been made at Hanford's vitrification plant, but the concept of building as the design is being completed on large, complex projects remains valid, the Hanford Department of Energy manager of the project said Thursday. John Eschenberg gave what he called a "self-critical and unvarnished perspective" on lessons learned at the $12.2 billion vitrification plant to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board in Washington, D.C. He stressed the importance of understanding risk and the early resolution of technical issues. At the vitrification plant, technical and safety issues, like an inadequate earthquake design standard, were identified after construction began. DOE had processes in place to identify safety issues before construction, he said. But historically it has not had processes to ensure they were resolved before building began, he said. Instead, the emphasis at the vitrification plant has been on an aggressive schedule. Pressure to build as soon as possible, driven by the budget and legal deadlines, helped nix a plan to build two very large pilot scale plants, he said. He continues to support the concept of building as the design is being completed, however. "What you have to be careful of is the amount of separation between engineering and construction," he said. The vitrification plant project ran into trouble in 2003 when workers were building "literally as ink dried on the drawings," he said. In addition, the close schedule between engineering and construction reduced the time to recover from problems when design issues were discovered, he said. Among the examples of design issues he covered were insufficient information about earthquake risk, an inadequate knowledge of stresses in the plant's architecturally complex High Level Waste Facility, an inadequate design to keep some radioactive waste mixed within tanks and piping systems that would have allowed hydrogen to build up. DOE could have called for a peer review sooner for the load issues, he said. It also failed to tell the contractor on the project, Bechtel National, to use more sophisticated computer modeling software early on that could have captured the stresses. The potential hazards of hydrogen building up in piping has been known by industry for many years, he said. "In retrospect, conservative design principles were not used by the contractor," he said. "Quicker recognition that this principle had not been consistently applied in the design by DOE and the contractor would have mitigated this impact." Testing and redesign of the waste mixing system has taken almost five years, he said. "The lesson learned here was that complex technologies must be physically tested under conditions comparable to those that will be experienced under the range of operations you expect to run into," he said. DOE recognized at the outset of the project that quality assurance would be very important to its success, he said. Despite that, DOE reduced its oversight on non-nuclear quality assurance areas in 2002 as part of an initiative to emphasize that DOE was the contract manager, not the contractor. That problem is being corrected, Eschenberg said. Too few DOE staff to oversee the project also has been a problem, he said. If DOE had the necessary earthquake and related specialists consistently on staff, problems with the earthquake design standard might have been caught sooner, he said. Part of the staffing problem he attributed to a slow federal hiring process and the scarcity of highly qualified technical workers. "Currently, efforts are under way to significantly increase capability, and some initial progress had been made," he said. The project also is relying more on outside experts. Board Chairman A.J. Eggenberger said the board had identified some of the technical problems "very, very early." But DOE treated a list of 22 issues prepared by the board as "hoops we need to jump through" rather than giving serious and in-depth consideration of their potential impact on the project, he said. But overall the board members praised Eschenberg's presentation, calling it insightful, realistic and introspective. Video of the presentation is posted at www.dnfsb.gov with the presentation on the vitrification plant at about three hours and four minutes into the meeting. © 2007 Tri-City Herald, Associated Press & Other Wire Services ***************************************************************** 71 Platts: House appropriators question DOE's top nonproliferation official london (Platts)--23Mar2007 House appropriators questioned the DOE's top nonproliferation official over the department's plutonium disposition program. At a March 22 hearing of the House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee, Peter Visclosky and David Hobson questioned DOE's continuing adherence to an approach that would turn 34 metric tons of surplus weapons plutonium into mixed-oxide reactor fuel. Visclosky, the panel chairman, is an Indiana Democrat; Hobson, from Ohio, is the panel's top Republican. DOE now estimates that construction of the facility to fabricate the MOX fuel will cost $4.7 billion. In 2002, DOE's estimate was $1 billion. William Tobey, the deputy administrator for defense nuclear nonproliferation in DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration, said the MOX approach was expensive. But he said it was less costly than continued storage of weapons plutonium and more technically certain than the principal disposition alternative, which involves mixing the plutonium with high-level waste rather than making fuel out of it. Copyright © 2007 - Platts, All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 72 Infoshop News: Nevada Test Site Demonstration  Friday, March 23 2007 @ 10:42 PM PDT Join us at the Nevada Test Site on April 1st for a rally and action denouncing current nuclear plans and other warmaking preparations at the Test Site and propose alternatives for the land and industry. The rally and action are the culmination of NDE's Sacred Peace Walk. APRIL 1ST 2007 WE WON’T BE FOOLED! Rally and Action at the Nevada Test Site 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM SPEAKERS & MUSICIANS: Western Shoshone National Council Representative Martin Sheen Ann Wright Joanne Sheehan Loulena Miles Emma’s Revolution Sr. Rosemary Lynch Fr. Louis Vitale Julie Fischel Sacred Peace Walk Walkers Elliot Adams Francisco Herrera Stop "Complex 2030" Prevent Cancer Save Yucca Mountain No More War ENDORSED or PRODUCED By: www.NevadaDesertExperience.org Nevada Desert Experience, Western Shoshone National Council, MoveOn.org, FoodNotBombs, CROW, Shundahai Network, Desert Greens, Citizen Alert, Veterans for Peace, Western Shoshone Defense Project, Las Vegas Catholic Worker, Trinity Nuclear Abolitionists, Temple of Goddess Spirituality Dedicated to Sekhmet http://www.nevadadesertexperience.org/programs/2007/april1.htm Speakers & Musicians: Western Shoshone National Council Representative Martin Sheen - activist, peacemaker, actor - wikipedia Rep. Dennis Kucinich - Ohio Congressman Ret. Colonel Ann Wright - wikipedia Joanne Sheehan - War Resisters League New England - article Loulena Miles - staff attorney for Tri-Valley Cares Emma's Revolution - musicans Sr. Rosemary Lynch, OSF - bio Fr. Louis Vitale, OFM - bio Julie Fischel - attorney - Western Shoshone Defense Project Sacred Peace Walk Walkers Elliot Adams - Veterans for Peace Jane McAlevey - Executive Director of Service Employees International Union Local 1107 - Nevada Francisco Herrera - musician Media Coverage: Video news crew from the new Pahrump internet TV station, KPTU Pahrump Radio-KPAH is providing live, on-site broadcast facilities for event announcements. So bring your AM/FM radio. Endorsed or Produced by: Nevada Desert Experience, MoveOn.org, FoodNotBombs, CROW, Shundahai Network, Desert Greens, Veterans for Peace, Western Shoshone National Council, Western Shoshone Defense Project, Las Vegas Catholic Worker, Trinity Nuclear Abolitionists, Temple of Goddess Spirituality Dedicated to Sekhmet Join us at the Nevada Test Site on April 1st for a rally and action denouncing current nuclear plans and other warmaking preparations at the Test Site and propose alternatives for the land and industry. The rally and action are the culmination of NDE's Sacred Peace Walk. Driving Directions: Take Hwy 95 North out of Las Vegas. 65 miles out of town you will see the Mercury exit (past Indian Springs and Cactus Springs). Take the Mercury exit, and as soon as you can make a U-turn and drive under the freeway, to the west (if you keep going down the road without making a U-turn you will come to the legal boundary of the Nevada Test Site). * www.NevadaDesertExperie... * http://www.nevadadesert... * More by theroyprocess * More from Anti-War Activism Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.infoshop.org/inews/trackback.php?id=200703231519073 No trackback comments for this entry. Copyright © 2007 Infoshop News ***************************************************************** 73 lamonitor.com: Water Wars: LANL drills new wells The Online News Source for Los Alamos ROGER SNODGRASS Monitor Assistant Editor An ongoing dispute about regional water quality increased in pitch this week when a Santa Fe public interest group charged Los Alamos National Laboratory with downplaying data about radioactive contamination in drinking water wells. Andrew Phelps, the former associate director for Environmental Programs, had recently written to Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety offering further information on a difference of perspectives. Protecting drinking water supplies of the neighboring communities, he wrote, is one of the primary goals of the laboratory's groundwater project. CCNS had found data in the laboratory's current Draft Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement (SWEIS) that they believed indicated traces of radionuclide contamination in drinking water samples from Los Alamos and Santa Fe counties. The data echoed similar findings in a 1999 LANL SWEIS. Phelps wrote CCNS about what he called their "concern regarding potential neptunium-237, plutonium-238, 239 and 240, americium-241, cesium-137 and strontium-90 contamination in drinking water wells for Los Alamos County and the Buckman Wellfield (that serves Santa Fe)." Reviewing the data and using an even more sensitive analysis for neptunium in a December sample from Los Alamos County water, he acknowledged that there were naturally occurring radionuclides, like uranium. "For the remaining radionuclides," he wrote, "the overall pattern is that they are not detected in water supply samples," and showed no rising levels as CCNS supposed. Joni Arends, executive director of CCNS, working with geologist Robert Gilkeson and groundwater hydrologist George Rice, in turn found Phelps explanation objectionable. On Wednesday, they called a press conference to discuss a 31-page letter and supporting documentation they have sent in reply. "We note the recurring pattern of behavior in which LANL presents data to the public for comment and, upon receiving critical comments about the data, LANL later dismisses that data as spurious," CCNS wrote back to Phelps and new Acting Associate Director Carolyn Mangeng. Arends said she had found the reply to be skimpy, with insufficient supporting information. She responded with a list that included five other concerns and two recommendations. Referring to two charts provided by Phelps from the lab's Water Quality Database, she and Gilkeson said detections of laboratory radioactive wastes had clearly shown up in samples. "They didn't say which wells and they didn't give us the data," said Arends. "There are no highs, no lows, no mean standard deviations." In an interview Thursday, Tina Behr-Andres, the laboratory's water stewardship program director, said the detections were below the level of Minimum Detectable Activity. Below that standard, she said, detections are bogus or even "negative in value." In order to have validity, detections must be confirmed over time and meet a number of other validation standards. The numbers in the 1999 and 2006 SWEISs were included in order to maintain a continuity of the record and to bracket data before and after the Cerro Grande Fire in 2000, she added. Further, she said, data below the Minimum Detectable Activity will no longer be used, and the final version of the current SWEIS will contain language that clarifies the unsubstantiated findings. The National Academies of Science is currently reviewing a draft report of its evaluations and recommendations on how well the laboratory is protecting the groundwater and controlling off-site contamination. The New Mexico Environment Department continues to regulate groundwater investigations under a Consent Order that governs comprehensive cleanup activities at Los Alamos. A major priority has had to do with a revelation in late 2005 that hexavalent chromium contamination from the laboratory was discovered in the regional aquifer. Under a work plan for the chrome project, the laboratory expects to start drilling two new sentinel wells next week, R-35A and R-35B to characterize the chromium plume and guard the county's drinking water well, known as PM-3. "R-35, is one of a whole host of activities we're doing to understand where the chromium is," said Behr-Andres. The water project plans an evening meeting (time to be announced) for the public at Fuller Lodge on April 11, addressing chromium issues and the lab's confidence in the adequacy of its groundwater data. © 2003 Los Alamos Monitor All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************