***************************************************************** 03/19/07 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 15.65 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 Iran News: Russia urges talks on Iran nuclear issue 2 FT.com: In depth - UAE wins US reprieve on Iran exports 3 UPI: U.N. chief: Mideast problems intertwined 4 AFP: Iran stop inspectors visiting nuclear site - diplomats - 5 Comment is free: Iran must have the Bomb 6 Reuters: N.Korea talks to look beyond reactor closure 7 Korea Times: Full Text of US Statement on Disposition of N. Korean F 8 Korea Times: `Nuke Facilities to Be Shut Down After Release of Froze 9 english.eastday.com: Fresh round six-party nuclear talks launched 10 Guardian Unlimited: U.S., North Korea Resolve Bank Dispute 11 Guardian Unlimited: U.S. Missile Defense Plan Condemned 12 UPI: U.S. defense plan could 'split Europe' 13 UPI: Analysis: U.S. missiles divide Germans 14 UPI: Israel, U.S. winding up anti-missile tests 15 Guardian Unlimited: U.S., Germany Minimize Differences 16 Scotland: In a party at war with itself, Trident will bring about 17 Scotland: Trident plan 'puts climate change research at risk' 18 Independent: Blair is on a mission from God, says diplomat's wife 19 UPI: Outside View: A new Middle East covenant NUCLEAR REACTORS 20 Economic Times: US energy secy to take stock of India's needs 21 Economic Times: India has other options too, says Kakodkar- 22 DAILY YOMIURI: 2 more N-plants admit past problems with rods 23 RIA Novosti: Russia, Kazakhstan presidents to talk trade, energy, se 24 Moscow Times: Kazakhs Hail Nuclear Joint Venture 25 RIA Novosti: Atomstroyexport set to build first NPP in Morocco 26 RIA Novosti: Russia to join nuclear projects in S. Africa - 27 US: Oshkosh Northwestern: Boaters reminded of security rules around 28 US: NRC: NRC to Discuss 2006 Performance Assessment for Perry Nuclea 29 IHT: U.S. Trilateral Commission debates ways to curb energy use and 30 Reuters: More Japanese utilities admit nuclear incidents 31 US: Reuters: Ex-CIA chief says U.S. must act on climate 32 UPI: Austria against nuclear deal with India 33 Prague Daily Monitor: President criticises minister over Temelin 34 England's Northwest: Nuclear contractor wins Cumbria bid 35 AFP: Russia, S.Africa to co-operate on nuclear technology - 36 US: Vermont Guardian: Vermont's attorney general joins VY complaint 37 US: KnoxNews: ReNuke plans to staff nation?s nuclear rebirth NUCLEAR SECURITY 38 UPI: Outside View: U.S.-Russia space tensions NUCLEAR SAFETY 39 US: [NukeNet] The mountain that will spit poison 40 Vermont Guardian: New KI pills ready for residents near Vermont Yank 41 US: Oshkosh Northwestern: Proposed emission rules stir debate NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 42 [NukeNet] Israeli discovery converts dangerous radioactive waste 43 US: TheStar.com: Cameco shares climb on Cigar Lake plan 44 Interfax: IAEA delegation to visit future uranium enrichment center 45 US: Salt Lake Tribune: Capping waste: Gov. Huntsman cut a deal that 46 IHT: Russia's international uranium enrichment center to begin work 47 UPI: Russia: Nuclear fuel centers a priority 48 Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation: Deadline for nuclear waste commen PEACE US DEPT. OF ENERGY 49 DOE: DOE Issues Solicitation for Purchase of Oil for the 50 Santa Fe Nw Mexican: Trinity Site opening to public April 7 51 Tri-City Herald: Fluor may use divers to clean K Basin sludge ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 Iran News: Russia urges talks on Iran nuclear issue Monday, March 19, 2007 - ?2005 IranMania.com LONDON, March 19 (IranMania) - Iran and the UN Security Council need to take a timeout on the Iranian nuclear question, a top Russian official said, UPI reported. Igor Ivanov, secretary of the Russian Security Council, said Iran should stop to think about its uranium enrichment program, while the UN group should do the same in regards to its position on Iran, Novosti reported. "Iran and the international community must take a pause and find a solution through negotiations and come to a common conclusion," Ivanov said. "All the parties need to stop and sit down to a table of negotiations at the level of experts." Iran resumed uranium enrichment in January 2006, bringing it under international scrutiny and pressure. The United States and some other Western countries are concerned that Tehran intends to pursue a nuclear weapons program, an accusation Iran denies. ?1999-2007 IranMania.com . Terms & Conditions . Privacy . Stats-> ***************************************************************** 2 FT.com: In depth - UAE wins US reprieve on Iran exports Iran's nuclear policy By Guy Dinmore in Washington Published: March 19 2007 22:03 | Last updated: March 20 2007 00:45 The Bush administration appears to have backed away from a threat to impose stricter controls on US exporters to the United Arab Emirates in response to its ally’s efforts to clamp down on the diversion of dual-use items to Iran. Industry sources told the Financial Times on Monday that the US Department of Commerce had put pressure on the UAE, an important trans-shipment centre, to step up scrutiny of its exports as part of a broader effort to isolate Iran over its nuclear programme. A UAE official said Sheikha Lubna al-Qassimi, the UAE economy minister, had been assured in talks in Washington that the UAE was not the intended target of a newly established country group ‘C’ designation that would require tighter US controls over exports to trans-shipment hubs suspected of being conduits for military-related and other sensitive items. The commerce department announced in the federal register on February 26 its intention to designate “country group C: destinations of diversion concern” that would require strengthening of US export controls. It named no countries and gave an unusually short two-week period for industry to comment. Some industry analysts saw the move as a heavy-handed attempt to put pressure on the UAE when the US is trying to tighten all available economic measures against Iran. Last December, a US official spoke of growing concern in the Bush administration over an increasing number of controlled items being diverted from ports in the UAE, particularly Dubai, to Iran and Syria. He threatened unspecified steps if action was not taken. On Monday a US official said it was premature to say which countries, if any, would be listed as category C’ He said a proposed UAE export control law, approved by the UAE cabinet this month, was a positive and welcome development and that the US hoped it would be enforced. One industry source cited a senior commerce department official as saying the US would not go forward with its threat to impose category C status on the UAE. However, another source suggested that the warning made in December did not represent the Bush administration’s official position and that the implied threat ­carried in the federal register notice was not aimed at the UAE. The sensitive dual-use goods that the US wants to stop reaching Iran include chemicals, oil production equipment and computer technology. US exporters to countries designated under category C would be re-quired to obtain export licences for a range of goods that have not been specified. Industry analysts said the apparent reprieve for the UAE would be welcomed by Halliburton, the US oil ser-vices and construction company, which announced last week it would move its chief executive and corporate headquarters to Dubai. The UAE has remained an important trans-shipment hub for Iran despite a long-running territorial dispute. Responding to US pressure, the UAE has intercepted dozens of ships bearing suspect goods and closed down more than 24 trading companies. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 3 UPI: U.N. chief: Mideast problems intertwined United Press International - NewsTrack - Published: March 19, 2007 at 12:49 PM CAIRO, March 19 (UPI) -- U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said Monday problems in the Middle East are all intertwined and will not be resolved in a piecemeal fashion. Ban made the remarks in an interview with Cairo's Al-Akhbar newspaper and gave priority to finding a two-state solution in the dispute between Palestinians and Israelis. The new U.N. chief said he would be touring the entire region soon, stopping in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories and Israel to gather opinions on the various issues, Kuwait's KUNA news agency reported. He said the United Nations has been instrumental in helping Iraq with technical guidance and support for political groups, as well as providing human rights monitors. Ban said he hoped Iran would act on a December U.N. Security Council resolution and return to talks about regulation of its nuclear industry. He said economic sanctions were not the United Nations' ultimate goal but rather a return to negotiations, the report said. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 4 AFP: Iran stop inspectors visiting nuclear site - diplomats - by Michael Adler Mon Mar 19, 4:31 PM ET VIENNA (AFP) - Iran stopped UN inspectors from visiting an underground bunker where it is building an industrial-scale plant to make enriched uranium but the inspectors will try again, diplomats told AFP Monday. Iran had promised "frequent inspector access" to the site in Natanz, the UN watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in February. The highly sensitive inspections, and talks over how they are to take place, came as Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was expected to plead Iran's case this week before the UN Security Council, which is considering tightening sanctions on the Islamic republic over fears that it seeks nuclear weapons. A centre of concern is the uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, in central Iran, where the Iranians are already operating above-ground a pilot plant carrying out research levels of enrichment, the process which makes what can be fuel for civilian nuclear reactors but also the explosive core of atom bombs. A diplomat said Iran had last Saturday refused to let IAEA inspectors into the underground hall at Natanz where the Iranians have set up hundreds of centrifuges in what is to be a 3,000-centrifuge facility for enriching uranium. Centrifuges are the machines used to refine uranium for the U-235 isotope that is valuable for fuel or weapons. Such a facility could make enough highly enriched uranium for an atom bomb in about 10 months, according to the IISS think-tank in London. Other diplomats, all requesting anonymity due to the extreme delicacy of the issue, said IAEA inspectors are set to return this week, possibly Tuesday, to the plant and that delays in inspections were normal and could just be a matter of schedule changes or working out legal issues. Blocking access definitively to Natanz would be a violation of Iran's obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iranian officials in Vienna were not immediately reachable for comment. IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei had reported on February 22 that the agency wanted to put cameras in the centrifuge hall in accordance with "safeguards measures that needed to be implemented . . . prior to the introduction of nuclear material into the facility." The report said that Iran was spinning centrifuges empty, without uranium feedstock gas, in two 164-centrifuge production lines, and was finishing installing two other similar cascades, also totalling 328 centrifuges. ElBaradei said the IAEA had "agreed to interim verification arrangements" at Natanz's underground site "involving frequent inspector access but not remote monitoring." "Iran was informed that these arrangements (which are now in place) would be valid only for as long as the number of machines installed ... did not exceed 500, and that, once that number was exceeded, all required safeguards measures would need to be implemented," ElBaradei said. The first diplomat said Iran did not want the IAEA to see "that it now has more than 500 centrifuges functioning underground" and that was the reason for the delay. Tehran is defying the UN Security Council's calls for it to suspend uranium enrichment. Iran insists its nuclear program is a peaceful effort to generate electricity. Iran warned on Monday that it would make a "proportionate" response to any new UN sanctions. Diplomats in Vienna speculated that cutting off access to Natanz might be part of this response. The 15-member Security Council is due to meet Wednesday to review a draft sanctions resolution against Iran agreed last week by the body's five permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany. New sanctions would include barring Iran from exporting arms and buying weapons such as missiles. Iran would have 60 days to comply with repeated UN demands or face "further appropriate measures" (economic sanctions but no military action) under Article 41 of the UN Charter. Copyright 2007 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 5 Comment is free: Iran must have the Bomb guardian.co.uk/commentisfree > David Cox Efforts to bully Tehran into abandoning uranium enrichment are both futile and dangerous. March 19, 2007 2:00 PM | Printable version The proposed new package of United Nations sanctions against Iran is far from being the breakthrough it has been hailed. The world's fourth-largest oil producer has little to fear from modest economic restrictions. If Iran wants nuclear weapons, it is going to get them. The indications are that it does want them, and with good reason. The country faces the continuing hostility of the United States, which is engaged in a "war on terror" and has called Iran the world's "most active state sponsor of terrorism". The US has already invaded Iran's next-door neighbour, Iraq, but North Korea has shown that the Bomb provides immunity from American attack. Iran's most obvious potential antagonist in its region, Israel, possesses nuclear weapons, as do surrounding countries such as Pakistan, India and Russia. The British government has just announced that it considers nuclear weapons essential to its own security, for reasons far less obvious than those that must occur to any Iranian. British politicians are also in the habit of pointing out that possessing the Bomb guarantees global influence, something which Iran might well covet. Within living memory, Iranians have seen foreign powers invade their country, appropriate their oil resources and impose puppet rulers on them. Fewer than 20 years ago they were fighting an eight-year war on their border that claimed more than a million lives. It is entirely understandable that they should now wish to maximise their security. Any regime in Tehran that neglected to develop nuclear weapons would arguably be failing in its duty. In these circumstances, Canute-like efforts to thwart Iranian ambitions will serve only to reduce the UN's credibility. They will certainly stoke up nationalist fervour in Iran, diminishing the chances that moderate political elements will be able to make headway. They will also have even more damaging effects. As long as the "international community" maintains that a nuclear Iran is unthinkable, Israel will be tempted to mount a pre-emptive strike against Iranian facilities, even if the US lacks the stomach to do so itself. This will cause a relentless rise in regional tensions as Iran's nuclear programme progresses. The Iranians have warned that military action against them would provoke a military response. They might block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 18% of the world's oil supplies pass every day. They might annex southern Iraq, prompting a Sunni response that could bring about a regional conflagration sucking in Syria, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. At present, this seems to be where we are heading. Instead, Security Council members could abandon their doomed quest to obstruct Iranian nuclear aspirations. The US could use its stranglehold over Israel to force it to do likewise. Iran could be left to develop its nuclear programme as it saw fit, and to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty if it chose to, just as North Korea did in 2003. Such a course would have its dangers. But would these really be worse than those that we face already? Hopes of preventing further nuclear proliferation would inevitably be dealt a blow, but the dream of nuclear continence has already effectively evaporated. Egypt and Saudi Arabia might insist on joining the nuclear club, but would that make the Middle East less peaceful than it is now? It is imbalance, not balance, that creates instability. Currently, Israel's nuclear status unsettles its neighbours, while Israel itself has to be constantly primed to defend its advantage. A nuclear stand-off might help to stabilise the area, just as it stabilised Cold War Europe. It might even create the conditions for more realistic negotiation over the region's future. India and Pakistan's Cuba moment in 2002 certainly seems to have helped cool passions. What, though, about President Ahmadinejad's infamous threat to wipe Israel of the map? Well, there never was any such threat. What Ahmadinejad actually called for was merely regime change in Jerusalem, and, unlike President Bush in Iraq, he was not proposing to bring it about himself. Demagogues go in for bluster; it is not always to be taken at face value. It does of course remain possible that some future leader of a nuclear-armed Iran would indeed abuse his position. Unfortunately, this is a contingency that the world is in any case powerless to eliminate. Vainly trying to do so will create more immediate dangers. Accepting the inevitable now looks like the lesser of the two evils confronting us. Guardian Unlimited Guardian News and Media Limited 2007. Registered in England and Wales. No. 908396 Registered office: Number 1 Scott Place, Manchester M3 3GG ***************************************************************** 6 Reuters: N.Korea talks to look beyond reactor closure Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:52PM EDT By Chris Buckley BEIJING (Reuters) - Talks aimed at ending North Korea's nuclear threat will focus on Tuesday on how to disable the reactor at the heart of its nuclear program and begin mapping out future disarmament steps, the chief U.S. envoy said. U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said the six-party talks in Beijing would consider what happens after a mid-April deadline, when North Korea is due to shut the Yongbyon reactor in return for economic aid and security assurances spelled out in an initial February 13 agreement. "Clearly we have to meet all the 60-day milestones. That's why we're here -- to review that, and we'll be doing that today," he told reporters on Tuesday. "Frankly, I hope the 60-day discussions will go pretty quickly today and we can get onto the lengthier discussions about the next phase," Hill said. Tasks for the six parties -- the two Koreas, the United States, host China, Japan and Russia -- after the deadline would involve "disabling" the reactor and requiring that North Korea report other nuclear activities. Those steps promise to test the wary North, which exploded its first nuclear device last year. "We need to know what the full picture of their nuclear programs are, so that when they're abandoned and dismantled we've done all of it," Hill said. Continued... Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 7 Korea Times: Full Text of US Statement on Disposition of N. Korean Funds Hankooki.com > The Korea Times > Nation > North Korea Today The following is the full text of a statement issued in Beijing on Monday by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Treasury Daniel Glaser on the disposition of North Korea-related funds frozen at a Macau-based bank, Banco Delta Asia. DPRK stands for Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, the official name of North Korea _ ED. The United States and North Korean Governments have reached an understanding on the disposition of DPRK-related funds frozen at Banco Delta Asia. The DPRK has proposed the transfer of the roughly $25 million frozen in BDA into an account held by North Korea's Foreign Trade Bank at the Bank of China in Beijing. North Korea has pledged, within the framework of the Six-Party Talks, that these funds will be used solely for the betterment of the North Korean people, including for humanitarian and educational purposes. We believe this resolves the issue of the DPRK-related frozen funds. The disposition of the frozen assets has always been and remains a decision by the Macanese authorities to be taken in accordance with Macanese law. North Korea will need to work out the legal and technical intricacies of the arrangement with the Macanese. The Treasury has communicated to both the Macanese and Chinese governments the United States' support of this arrangement. Separately, the final rule against Banco Delta Asia, issued by the Treasury Department under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, remains in place. The Treasury will continue to cooperate with the Macanese on this and other anti-money laundering issues. The events of the past 18 months demonstrate our lack of tolerance for illicit activity conducted in the global financial system. Financial institutions that facilitate weapons proliferation, terrorist financing, narcotics trafficking, and other illicit financial activity should be on notice of the significant consequences they face. 03-19-2007 14:04 ***************************************************************** 8 Korea Times: `Nuke Facilities to Be Shut Down After Release of Frozen Funds' Hankooki.com > The Korea Times > Nation > North Korea Today North Korea's top nuclear negotiator said Monday in Beijing that the Stalinist country will halt its nuclear activities as soon as all of its funds frozen at a Macau bank are released, the Yonhap News Agency reported Monday. "If the Banco Delta Asia (BDA) issue is completely resolved, (North Korea) will halt its nuclear activities at Yongbyon," Kim Kye-gwan was quoted as saying in a keynote speech at the opening of the latest round of international talks over the North's nuclear weapons program. Top American nuclear envoy Christopher Hill announced that Washington and Pyongyang have resolved a dispute over $25 million in frozen North Korean funds at a Macau-based bank, clearing the way for the Norths denuclearization. U.S. Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Daniel Glaser said the funds would be transferred into a North Korean account at the Bank of China in Beijing to be use for education and humanitarian purposes. With the agreement, the financial dispute between the U.S. and North Korea came to an end after Washington designated BDA as a primary money-laundering concern in September 2005. Meanwhile, North Korea's Yongbyon nuclear reactor, which faces a shutdown as part of last month's six-nation agreement aimed at dismantling the North's nuclear weapons program, is currently operating normally, Yonhap reported quoting a ranking official at the National Intelligence Service (NIS) in Seoul. "Yongbyon's 5-megawatt nuclear reactor is in normal operation at present, considering a constant stream of steam spotted coming from its cooling tower," Yonhap quoted the NIS official as saying on condition of anonymity. Under the accord reached on Feb. 13, North Korea has 60 days to shut down its plutonium-producing Yongbyon facility in return for 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil for electricity production. "Whether the Yongbyon reactor is in operation or not can be determined by the existence of the cooling tower steam. Depending on some operational and weather conditions, however, such steam may not be visible," said the official. "Therefore, North Korea's suspension of the Yongbyon reactor will be confirmed by the halt of the cooling tower steam or on-the-spot inspection by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors," he explained. IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei told reporters after completing his trip to North Korea last week that the state wanted U.S. financial restrictions resolved before it shuts down the Yongbyon reactor and readmits inspectors as agreed upon in the six-party agreement. 03-19-2007 19:36 ***************************************************************** 9 english.eastday.com: Fresh round six-party nuclear talks launched 19/3/2007 17:10 The sixth round negotiation of the six-party talks on the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue started in Beijing this morning after the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the United States reached an understanding on a frozen fund issue. The United States agreed to transfer the DPRK-related frozen fund at Macao-based Banco Delta Asia (BDA) to a Chinese bank in Beijing, said U.S. Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Daniel Glaser Monday morning before the nuclear talks started. "We have assurances the funds are going to be transferred to a bank in Beijing to be used for humanitarian and educational purposes," said Glaser in a statement. The DPRK has proposed the transfer of the roughly 25 million U.S. dollars into an account held by DPRK's Foreign Trade Bank at the Bank of China in Beijing, the statement said. In September 2005, the U.S. Treasury Department, suspecting the BDA of helping the DPRK launder money, ordered American financial institutions to suspend business ties with the Macao-based bank, which subsequently froze the U.S. dollar accounts held by the DPRK government. Rejecting the charge, the DPRK demanded the U.S. lift the financial sanctions before it could return to the six-party talks, which remained stalled for 13 months since the end of 2005. As part of the nuclear deal reached during the last round talks in Beijing on Feb. 13, the United States agreed to settle the financial dispute with the DPRK within 30 days. The DPRK has pledged, within the framework of the six-party talks, that these funds will be used solely for the well-being of its people, including for the humanitarian and educational purposes, according to the statement. "We believe this resolves the issue of the DPRK-related frozen funds," Glaser said. China's chief negotiator Wu Dawei said at the opening ceremony of the nuclear talks that based on the agreements the concerned parties have reached, this meeting will focus on three issues. "The first is to listen to the reports of all working groups; the second is to discuss the specific steps for the implementation of the initial actions; the third is to carry out preliminary discussion about the steps or actions that all parties are prepared to take or should take in the next phase," Wu said. However, Wu said there are still a lot of difficulties and obstacles on the way ahead. As the chair of the meeting, Wu said he sincerely hopes that "all sides will continue to take part in all the meetings with a flexible, pragmatic and constructive approach and make positive contribution to the progress of the completion of all agenda items of this meeting." "The Chinese delegation will work closely with all other delegations to work for new progress and achievements of this meeting," he said. Xinhua news ***************************************************************** 10 Guardian Unlimited: U.S., North Korea Resolve Bank Dispute From the Associated Press Monday March 19, 2007 3:01 PM By CHRISTOPHER BODEEN Associated Press Writer BEIJING (AP) - The United States and North Korea have resolved a dispute over $25 million in frozen North Korean funds, clearing the way for progress in dismantling the North's nuclear programs, U.S. officials said Monday. The U.S. nuclear envoy, Christopher Hill, said six-party talks, which resumed Monday, could now ``move on to the next problem, of which there are many.'' Meanwhile, North Korea questioned Japan's qualifications to participate in the talks, ratcheting up recent tensions between the two sides. U.S. Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Daniel Glaser said the funds in a small bank in Macau would be transferred into a North Korean account at the Bank of China in Beijing to be used for education and humanitarian purposes. Glaser said North Korea had proposed the arrangement. Sean McCormack, a State Department spokesman, acknowledged that the United States would have difficulty monitoring how North Korea uses the money. ``Because of the nature of Korean society, it is difficult to monitor activities in North Korea. There is a limited ability to do that,'' McCormack told reporters. The funds, some of which U.S. authorities suspect may be linked to counterfeiting or money-laundering by cash-starved North Korea, had held up progress in nuclear disarmament talks. Officials in Macau said they would follow North Korea's instructions and release the frozen funds. ``North Korea has pledged ... that these funds will be used solely for the betterment of the North Korean people,'' Glaser said. ``We believe this resolves the issue of the DPRK-related frozen funds,'' he said, using the acronym for North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The Feb. 13 disarmament agreement gave North Korea 60 days to shut down both its main reactor and a plutonium processing plant, and allow U.N. monitors to verify the closures. In return, North Korea is to receive energy and economic assistance, and a start toward normalizing relations with the U.S. and Japan. Also Monday, Japan's chief envoy Kenichiro Sasae said his North Korean counterpart Kim Kye Gwan ``questioned Japan's commitment to meet its requirements and also questioned its qualifications to remain participants'' of the six-nation ument is totally off the mark and the question about our qualification is not worth a comment,'' Sasae told reporters. Hill said he did not think the dispute would obstruct negotiations, but he urged North Korea to improve ties with Japan. ``Japan is obviously a very important country to us all, and I would include the DPRK in that, and I would hope the DPRK would understand what its interests are,'' Hill said. In Vietnam earlier this month, talks between North Korea and Japan on normalizing ties ended without any progress. Korean negotiators at the time reacted angrily to Japan's insistence that they first resolve questions about the North's abduction of Japanese citizens in the 1970s and 1980s. Chinese envoy Wu Dawei told delegates at the opening of the talks that the negotiations still faced ``a lot of difficulties and obstacles,'' and called on representatives to ``make joint efforts to overcome them.'' This week's session will focus on reviewing the progress of five related working group meetings held over the past month, discuss specific steps necessary to meet the April 14 shutdown deadline and begin talking about what actions would come after it, Wu said. U.S. allegations in 2002 that North Korea has a secret uranium enrichment program prompted the North to expel U.N. inspectors and eventually led to North Korea detonating its first nuclear device last year. The North Korean deposits have been frozen in Banco Delta Asia, or BDA, since Washington blacklisted the small, privately run Macau-based bank 19 months ago on suspicion the funds were connected to money-laundering or counterfeiting. Hill said the resolution showed ``the DPRK understood our concerns and are prepared to cooperate with us to ensure that this money is used appropriately.'' Those attending Monday's talks said Kim reiterated earlier remarks that North Korea would stop activities at the Yongbyon reactor once the funds were fully released. --- Associated Press writers Bo-Mi Lim and Mari Yamaguchi in Beijing contributed to this report. Guardian Unlimited Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 11 Guardian Unlimited: U.S. Missile Defense Plan Condemned From the Associated Press Monday March 19, 2007 9:31 AM BERLIN (AP) - The leader of Germany's governing Social Democrats criticized U.S. plans to locate a missile defense system in eastern Europe, insisting in an interview published Monday that ``we need no new missiles in Europe.'' The U.S. plan to place a radar base in the Czech Republic and 10 interceptor missiles in Poland as part of its proposed missile defense shield has infuriated Russia and prompted some unease elsewhere in Europe. ``We need no new missiles in Europe,'' Kurt Beck, the chairman of the center-left Social Democrats, was quoted as saying in an interview with the mass-circulation Bild daily. The Social Democrats make up half of conservative Chancellor Angela Merkel's governing coalition. Beck said his party ``does not want a new arms race between the USA and Russia on European soil.'' ``Europe must speak with one voice here,'' he added, according to the report. ``There are enough problems worldwide that we need to master; I would name poverty, climate change and terrorism - new missiles and weapons systems won't help here.'' Washington says the planned defense system would protect against a potential threat from Iran. It has sought to allay Russian concerns with assurances that the small bases would have no effect on Moscow's nuclear deterrent. Beck's comments came after Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a Social Democrat, called over the weekend for ``calm and seriousness, not agitation.'' Steinmeier wrote for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that the U.S. desire to protect itself from Iranian missiles ``is legitimate ... but security cannot be bought at the price of a new mistrust or a brand-new insecurity.'' Germany currently holds the European Union presidency. On Monday, Steinmeier and top EU officials were to meet Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Washington. Guardian Unlimited Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 12 UPI: U.S. defense plan could 'split Europe' United Press International - NewsTrack - Published: March 19, 2007 at 2:14 PM MOSCOW, March 19 (UPI) -- A U.S. plan to deploy a missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland could "split Europe," a political scientist said Monday. "My personal opinion is that consultations should have been conducted with Russia, and, first of all, within NATO itself. This did not happen. The German side also felt it had not been well informed on the issue," said Alexander Rahr, the director of the Russia/Commonwealth of Independent States program and a member of Germany's Council of Foreign Relations, RIA Novosti reported. The United States has said it plans to place a radar installation in the Czech Republic and a missile base in Poland by 2012 as a defense against potential attacks from Iran. Russia has objected to the plans. Russian President Vladimir Putin told a German security conference in February that the defense system could trigger a new arms race and accused the United States of ignoring international law, RIA Novosti reported. RIA Novosti reported that Ukraine could become a bridge between Russia and the West. Putin's remarks in Munich could result in Russia and Europe working jointly on the issue of nuclear defense, he said, RIA Novosti reported. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 13 UPI: Analysis: U.S. missiles divide Germans United Press International - International Intelligence - Published: March 19, 2007 at 2:25 PM By STEFAN NICOLA UPI Germany Correspondent BERLIN, March 19 (UPI) -- For the first time since Chancellor Angela Merkel took power in late 2005, German officials sharpened criticism toward Washington because of its plan to station a missile-defense system in Eastern Europe. Over the weekend, several members from the Social Democratic Party, Merkel's center-left coalition partner, criticized the U.S. anti-missile system as provoking political instability in Europe. "We don't want a new arms race," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who on Monday was due to meet with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Washington, wrote in a guest commentary for the Sunday edition of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper. He warned Washington against trying to split Europe into "old" and "new" again. The comments were a reference to former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's criticism of Germany and France for opposing the Iraq war. The head of Steinmeier's party, Kurt Beck, spoke even more clearly how he felt about the U.S. missiles, lobbying for a joint European Union stance against them. "We don't need new rockets in Europe," he told the Bild newspaper. Washington claims the system, which foresees 10 bunker-protected rockets to be stationed in Poland and a radar unit in the Czech Republic by 2011-12, is to protect the United States and its allies against long-range rockets armed with nuclear warheads fired by the likes of North Korea and Iran. Last week U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Henry Obering, who oversees the American rocket defense system, held talks in Berlin with officials in the German Defense Ministry and German Parliament to alleviate fears that the system could strain Russia's relations with the West. Obering promised the Germans that the system was "purely defensive." Yet Russia sees the missiles as threats against its territory. Russian President Vladimir Putin said last month at a security conference the U.S. plans would provoke a new arms race. Last week Merkel was in Poland for bilateral talks with the Polish president and the country's prime minister; in Warsaw she lobbied for integrating the U.S. anti-missile system into NATO, observers say. The political leaders in both Eastern European countries are supporting the U.S. plans, but the public opposition has been growing recently. The Polish opposition has vowed to fight for a referendum on the issue. In the Czech Republic, roughly 70 percent are against participating in the defense system, and 80 percent feel a referendum should be the basis of the country's decision on whether or not to do so. Merkel, who has managed to significantly improve U.S.-German relations since she took office, is far less critical of the system than her Social Democratic colleagues. Eckart von Klaeden, the foreign-policy spokesman for Merkel's conservatives, said one shouldn't fall for Russian propaganda that the system was directed against Russia. "Whoever pursues a convincing containment strategy toward Iran, whoever is against a military strike against Iran, must seriously consider" the U.S. anti-missile plans, he told the online version of German news magazine Der Spiegel Monday. "That's why Mr. Beck's criticism is baffling to me." Merkel is concerned the row over the U.S. missiles divides Europe at a time when Berlin is focusing its efforts on reviving the EU's aspirations for a common constitution. Germany holds the rotating six-month EU presidency and also chairs the Group of Eight, a venue Berlin uses to deepen trans-Atlantic ties by removing trade barriers and forging a consensus on combating climate change. At a trans-Atlantic economic conference in Berlin Monday, Merkel warned both sides -- her coalition partner and the United States -- not to divide the international community. "No one will manage the new challenges alone," she said. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights ***************************************************************** 14 UPI: Israel, U.S. winding up anti-missile tests United Press International - Security & Terrorism - 3/19/2007 11:54:00 AM -0400 TEL AVIV, Israel, March 19 (UPI) -- U.S. and Israeli military forces are winding up joint exercises involving anti-missile defenses. Juniper Cobra 2007, which ends Tuesday, has been mainly computer simulation testing response time, command-and-control, and communications in defending Israel against a missile attack. Taking part were the U.S. Army's 69th Air Defense Artillery Brigade and the Israeli Air Force's Air Defense Artillery Brigade, Ha'artetz reported on Sunday. The tests involved Israeli's Arrow anti-ballistic missile and its U.S.-made Patriot PAC-2. U.S. forces have also been testing the capabilities of the PAC-3 system. No firing of missiles has reportedly been involved because "of constraints associated with last summer's Lebanon war and U.S. deployments," the report said. Ha'artez quoted an Israeli defense official as saying live-fire interoperability exercises would resume in Juniper Cobra 2009. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 15 Guardian Unlimited: U.S., Germany Minimize Differences From the Associated Press Tuesday March 20, 2007 12:46 AM By DESMOND BUTLER Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - Germany's foreign minister said a U.S. plan to build a missile defense system in Europe was not damaging relations with the United States, as both countries sought to play down their differences. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that the system should have a stabilizing effect in Europe as the U.S. continued consultations with European allies and Russia, which has strenuously objected to the plans. She said the U.S. has expressed its willingness to cooperate with Russia on the missile defense system, but she did not elaborate. Standing next to Rice, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who has previously backed Russia's claims that it was not properly consulted on the plan, said he believed that the U.S. understands the German call for open discussions. ``It is not a disruption of American-German relations, none whatsoever,'' he said through a translator in a press conference following a meeting with Rice, also attended by EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana and External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner. The U.S. has said that contrary to the Russian and German criticism, officials have briefed Russia repeatedly on U.S. plans. Rice repeated the oft-stated U.S. response to the Russian objections that the program is aimed at counteracting Iran's developing missile capabilities, not Russia's vast nuclear arsenal. ``We live in a world where we face small nuclear threats, small potential missile threats from, for instance, Iran,'' she said. ``In that world, a limited missile defense that can deal with small threats is very much a stabilizing factor, not a destabilizing factor.'' The U.S. plan to place a radar base in the Czech Republic and 10 interceptor missiles in Poland as part of its proposed missile defense shield has infuriated Russia, which has suggested it could lead to a new arms race. Rice said Russia has nothing to fear from the program. ``We live in the world in which Russia and the United States have a good working relationship in which very few would contemplate the notion of a nuclear exchange,'' she said. Steinmeier's comments Monday followed sharp criticism of U.S. plans from the head of his own Social Democratic Party. ``We need no new missiles in Europe,'' Kurt Beck, the chairman of the center-left Social Democrats, or SPD, was quoted as saying in an interview with the mass-circulation Bild daily. He said his party, which makes up half of the ruling left-right coalition, ``does not want a new arms race between the USA and Russia on European soil.'' Steinmeier said that he is working during Germany's presidency of the EU to harmonize disparate European policies on the U.S. plans. ``The right place for such a discussion in my eyes would be NATO,'' he said, reiterating a proposal by Chancellor Angela Merkel. NATO is developing defenses against shorter-range missiles that could be used against its troops on the battlefield. The NATO plans would integrate existing national short-range missile defenses into an alliance system of intercepts and sensors. NATO officials have suggested that talks among the allies could focus on combining the short-range NATO system with the separate U.S. strategic shield to provide missile defense for all 26 allies. NATO allies are expected to discuss the issue at a foreign ministers' meeting in Norway next month. Solana, a former secretary-general of NATO, said at Monday's press conference that he believed that discussions would eventually ease Russian and European fears about missile defense. ``It is true that Russia has hypersensitivity about infrastructure being moved to the east,'' he said. ``I think when we talk and when we finalize the discussion that it will be understood by everyone.'' Though Rice did not qualify how the U.S. has suggested Russia cooperate with the plans, national security adviser Stephen Hadley has said in the past that he has approached Russia about building their own missile defense systems and contributing to the wider defense of Europe. Guardian Unlimited Guardian News and Media Limited 2007 ***************************************************************** 16 Scotland: In a party at war with itself, Trident will bring about Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:09:26 -0800 http://www.sundayherald.com/ oped/opinion/display.var.12676 72.0.0.php In a party at war with itself, Trident will bring about mass destruction LAST week, Tony Blair secured the renewal of Trident only because the Conservatives supported him. A total of 95 Labour MPs were unwilling to support their own prime minister on an issue of national security. It was the largest defence rebellion in Labour history. That this went by largely unmarked outside the Westminster village is an indication of how seriously things have deteriorated in the dog days of Blair. There was a time, not that long ago, when it would have been unthinkable for a Labour leader to rely on Tory votes in this way. Failure to carry the Parliamentary Labour Party would have been a possible resignation issue. Not any more. Instead we had the Labour chairwoman Hazel Blears popping up to congratulate the prime minister for winning "a majority of Labour backbenchers" - as if it was perfectly normal for the PM to fail to win the backing of his own MPs. The contagion of conscience even spread to that most loyal of groups, the Scottish Labour MPs. Fifteen of them rebelled on Trident, including the chancellor's chum Nigel Griffiths, who resigned as deputy leader of the House. The departure of the unnaturally ambitious Griffiths led to speculation about Gordon Brown's private views on Trident renewal. Would the pocket rocket have taken such a drastic step which nevertheless helps his prospects in his tight marginal Edinburgh South constituency, if there hadn't been a hint that Brown might be prepared to forgive this act of conscience and employ Griffiths in future? Only he knows. And we may never find out, because the way things are going, Gordon Brown is unlikely to make it to Number 10. It's too early to say that the Tories have won an election that's more than two years away, but if Labour go on like this, they have certainly lost it. The Cameron Conservatives have been returning their best polling figures since 1992, and this could become habit-forming. There is no law that says people can't start voting Tory again, in England at least. Blair has done Brown and Labour a huge disservice by letting Cameron get his feet under the table at Westminster. The new Tory leader has grown visibly in stature and authority while the prime minister's have drained away. And to add to Labour's woes last week, the Olympic costs tripled, Sir Hayden Phillips called for a cap on election donations from unions and, on a bad Blair day, Cameron's hairstyle upstaged the Climate Change Bill. A collapse of Labour support in the Scottish elections in May could be the beginning of the end for Labour in the UK. The party has been piling up the negatives as if determined to alienate as many Scottish voters as possible. Trident is another nail in the coffin. Renewal of the submarines, which will be based on the Clyde, was rejected by a clear majority of Scottish MPs - something the SNP will not let Labour forget. As we report today, one poll suggests that two-thirds of Scots believe it is unacceptable to station Trident here given the opposition from Scottish MPs. The Blairites want to blame Brown for any Scottish disaster, and the Brownites want to blame Blair - but they are both likely to get a kicking. Labour's electoral credibility will be the first casualty. Following the Trident vote, there is nothing to stop the dissidents from dissing the party establishment. It's not so long ago that rebellion on such a key issue as national security would have led to disciplinary action against errant Labour MPs. Or at least a severe spanking from the whips. That's not the case anymore. Trident shows that Labour MPs can now exercise their consciences without fear of the consequences. That loss of fear is immensely significant. The systems of party discipline and authority that defined New Labour in the early years of this administration have broken down. Remember the "pager clones"? They've gone the way of the electronic messaging device after which they were named. Labour MPs don't give a toss anymore and are increasingly becoming an opposition within their own government. Brown be warned. Meanwhile, Blair is becoming a government leader in exile, relying on Conservative votes to impose policies - from university funding to defence - which his own party oppose. It's a weird reversal of roles. The PM is so close ideologically to the Tories on education, Iraq, nuclear power, Trident, terrorism, attitudes to the White House and public services that there is almost a de facto coalition operating in Westminster. You wonder why Blair doesn't just cross the floor and be done with it. If you were a conspiracy theorist, which, of course, I'm not, you might have wondered whether Blair has been a Tory mole all along. It's difficult to see how he could have made his departure more protracted and damaging to Labour if he'd tried. SO, will Brown be able to put the party back together again? Restore discipline, provide vision and leadership? Inspire and enthuse a party which has lost the will to govern, if not the will to live? Possibly, but it's beginning to look like a lost cause for Brown. British voters don't favour divided parties - a house divided is a house defeated. The chancellor, of course, is a towering intellect and one of the greatest politicians of his age - as he'll no doubt demonstrate in his last Budget on Wednesday - but he's looking old and tired. He has compromised on many of the key issues that are causing his party to disintegrate, including Trident, which he supported. On issues such as defence, Brown is going to have to find some way of addressing the moral revulsion at the renewal of this system. My own view is that he may try to restore moral legitimacy by seeking to decommission Trident as part of the 2010 round of nuclear non-proliferation talks. I see no evidence that Brown is interested in nuclear weapons for their own sake. Since there are no targets for this cold war weapon system, it would be logical to stop sending the boats to sea. This could be used as an inducement to other countries to disarm. I can't help thinking that Brown would like to take a moral lead on nuclear disarmament, if he ever gets the chance. But then, what do I know? Nobody can see into the mind of Broon - a brooding enigma wrapped in a mystery. As on so many issues, the nuclear cards are held very close to the chancellor's chest. There is now a very real possibility that they will stay there, and Brown will take his secrets to the political graveyard. 8:13pm Saturday 17th March 2007 /By Iain Macwhirter/ ***************************************************************** 17 Scotland: Trident plan 'puts climate change research at risk' Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:10:50 -0800 http://www.sundayherald.com/ news/heraldnews/display.var. 1267705.0.trident_plan_puts_ climate_change_research_at _risk.php Trident plan puts climate change research at risk A GENERATION of scientists will be diverted from fighting climate change because the Trident weapons system is being replaced, an expert has warned. Thousands of highly trained scientists and engineers will be required to develop a new nuclear deterrent after a majority of MPs last week backed the government's controversial plans to renew the UK's ageing Trident missiles. The proposals have sparked a major political and public backlash. The government was forced to depend on the Conservatives to win a vote on the issue last Wednesday after 95 Labour MPs rejected the plans. Now Dr Stuart Robertson of Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR), a group that represents more than 900 leading scientists and engineers, has told the Sunday Herald the diversion of expertise to Trident risks putting vital climate change research on the back burner. He said: "We are very concerned that scientists will be diverted to Trident and used in that area for many years - this is happening at a time when there is an urgent need for professionals to be working on climate change, environmental sustainability and alternative energy. "The government waxes lyrical about about their commitment to tackling environmental damage, but they are very willing to drive all of these skilled people away from work on climate change to a hugely expensive, flawed project." SGR estimates around 3000 scientists and engineers from various disciplines will be recruited to work on Trident, at a time when official figures show the numbers of science graduates in the UK is falling. Between 1999 and 2005 the number of chemistry students dropped 20%, and maths students by 11%. Robertson also noted that government-funded research and development on alternative energy "is at very low levels" while spending on research for military applications is rising. Robertson said major military projects have a tendency to attract bright minds because of the amount lavished on facilities and support staff - money industry and academia cannot match. "The recruitment ads for scientists to work within the MoD very much emphasise that professionals will be able to work in cutting-edge science, which is attractive. Trident will cause an upscaling of that," he added. Among those who share Robertson's fears is Edinburgh East MP Dr Gavin Strang. He said: "Trident means large numbers of physicists especially being drawn into working on the project. This is a real setback for their deployment in industries and universities. "A lot is said about the technological opportunities climate change is bringing, but we will not get the benefit to industry if we can't get the experts to work on them because they are engaged in defence. That's bad news." Professor Robert Hinde, chairman of the eminent Pugwash Group, an international movement of academics concerned about the social impact of science, said the problem is "huge". "It has been estimated to me that the number of scientists and engineers diverted towards Trident will be in the thousands," he said. However, Professor William Walker of the University of St Andrews, a specialist in nuclear weapons proliferation, disagreed that Trident will cause the effect Robertson predicts. He said: "I don't believe that the number of scientists that will be used on Trident will be so high as to cause this concern. It's not as if the project involves designing new warheads, so the project won't need as many experts this time round." A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence also vigorously denied that Trident would affect scientific research on climate change. He said: "We disagree that scientists are a finite resource. Defence as a whole is the biggest employer of scientists and engineers in the UK and as such drives cutting-edge research and development across many areas "And frankly, we own the Met Office, which employs many experts working in the field of climate change. Without it we wouldn't even know that global warming was happening." 8:59pm Saturday 17th March 2007 /By Jenifer Johnston/ // ***************************************************************** 18 Independent: Blair is on a mission from God, says diplomat's wife By Oliver Duff Published: 20 March 2007 When Sir Christopher Meyer, Britain's former ambassador to Washington, published his memoirs DC Confidential 18 months ago, Tony Blair reportedly called him "a complete prick". A turnaround: in 1997, No 10 sent Meyer to the US with instructions to "get up the arse of the White House and stay there". And for the most part, the ex-diplomat's book protected Blair's reputation: although the PM had little appetite for detail, he said, and a penchant for "ball-crushingly tight trousers", criticisms were saved for other ministers. So Downing Street residents are unlikely to be tossing ticker tape over an interview that Sir Christopher's wife, Lady Catherine Meyer has granted Whitehall and Westminster World magazine, in which she mentions the famously testy subject of Blair and George Bush's shared Christianity. "They are both very religious and I believe that they both feel that what they are doing - especially Blair - is what God wants them to do and that God has chosen their way," says Lady Meyer, a Conservative who (regardless of the Meyers' pillow talk) had opportunity to observe both leaders closely. "This is why they bonded immediately." She adds: "Blair started talking about getting rid of Saddam Hussein way before September 11 ... in 1998. So I think that on Iraq he was more ready than Bush, who only really came into this conversation after 9/11." Lady Meyer goes on to accuse Blair's government of "astounding hypocrisy". One senses the end of a special relationship. Wembley's war of the warblers: Russell wins It wasn't so long ago that George Michael was too scared to set foot on stage, so his rebirth as a live artist, and in particular the announcement that he will be "the first star to play at the new Wembley" were greeted excitably. Michael's co-manager commented: "To be the first artist to play Wembley is a dream for him." The claim rankles with English opera singer Russell Watson who is booked to belt out a few notes at the stadium three weeks before George Michael's entourage get anywhere near the hallowed turf. Watson, back with a new album and a UK tour after surgery to remove a brain tumour in September, will lead a crowd of 90,000 singing the National Anthem, before the FA Cup Final on Saturday 19 May. The afternoon will be considerably more enjoyable for the tenor if his beloved Manchester United progress to lift the trophy. Mills: they're out to get me Heather Mills has trousered plenty of lolly from living in the public eye, but found her over-exposed split from Sir Paul McCartney unpleasant. Sussex Police has criticised Mills for making a "disproportionate" number of 999 calls; she risked, they said, "being treated as the little boy who cried wolf". Mills replies dramatically on her website: "Just before Christmas three officers visited me to say they had been made aware of a plot to kill me ... Maybe I should approach anyone standing outside my home late at night and say: 'Excuse me, are you a member of the press or are you part of the death plot?'" It's all a question of degree: Inspector Knacker insists that the threat was "non-specific" and that there has never been any "imminent risk" to Mills - so she should still get her day in court. Paper trail "Cameron: do as I say, not as I flew", read the front-page headline in The Sunday Telegraph, above a story that the supposedly green Conservative Party leader had taken a private plane from Oxford to Hereford - a journey of just two hours and 20 minutes by car. Readers with spectacularly boring existences may recall this entry from Dave in the parliamentary register of members' interests last September: "Helicopter flight from London to Brecqhou, and return, to meet with Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay." Shadow Chancellor Gideon (George) Osborne accompanied him over the choppy Channel waters and on to the Barclay brothers' island fortress. And the owners of the Telegraph newspapers are ... New-age Vikings promote peace After a 1,000-year hiatus, the Vikings have resumed raids on the Scottish mainland. Responding to Tony Blair's precious victory over "Son of Trident" (the PM's new generation of British nukes), 12 protesters from York, dressed as Vikings, arrived at the gates of Faslane nuclear submarine base at 6.30am yesterday, flapping their tunics and menacingly dipping their horned helmets. "The Vikings slaughtered tens of thousands of people, but they did so over half a millennium," said one sandal wearer. "Trident could do the same in one minute." Police placed the group under arrest before its members could rape and pillage a path up the west coast of Scotland. Nevertheless, protesters claimed a small moral victory by blockading the base for half an hour - something to warm their cockles, no doubt, while sitting on cold plastic bucket seats in the back of the police van. : Independent.co.uk 2007 Independent News and Media Limited ***************************************************************** 19 UPI: Outside View: A new Middle East covenant United Press International - International Intelligence - Published: March 19, 2007 at 1:47 PM By MORGAN STRONG UPI Outside View Commentator NEW YORK, March 18 (UPI) -- The Bush administration has agreed to support a Saudi Arabian peace plan for Israel and Palestine. Superficially, the plan, with no substantive difference, is the same Saudi peace plan first proposed in 2002 that the Bush administration rejected. The administration's willingness to join this Saudi initiative now is more than it appears. The agreement to join with the Saudis to advance their proposal acknowledges the American defeat in Iraq. This new covenant includes Israel, Jordan and Lebanon. The simple plan will bring a dreadful, though inevitable, catharsis to the Middle East. And if the plan is successful, Saudi Arabia will emerge as the dominant power in the Arab world, in a tacit partnership with Israel. The common enemy as understood by the parties to the Saudi agreement is Iran and the Iranian-sponsored paramilitaries: The Mahdi militia in Iraq, Hamas in the Palestinian territories and Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Saudi plan calls for a cooperative undertaking to rid the Middle East of Iranian influence by significantly weakening those paramilitary groups. The design anticipates that Iran will be drawn into a costly, futile effort in support of its surrogates. The Bush administration has agreed to allow the Saudis to fund and support the Sunni insurgency in Iraq. Several members of the Saudi aristocracy have supported the Sunni insurgency since its emergence following the invasion and the administration's ill-conceived purge of the Baath Party and the Iraqi army. The mechanics of the plan depend on their considerable influence within the insurgency. The Sunni paramilitary, properly directed, with American acquiescence and military support, will contest the Iranian supported Shiite militias. Israel will move to defeat Hezbollah on its northern border, and within Lebanon, with the government of Lebanon's support. The Palestine Liberation Organization, with Israeli and American help, is expected to subdue Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza. The Iranians are aware of the Saudi plan. They have tried to intimidate the parties to the agreement by exaggerating their capacity to construct a nuclear weapon. They have also exaggerated the competence of their long-range missiles. The administration now calculates that the only tactic it can successfully employ against the Sunni insurgency is to give them what they want -- if by doing so, American interests are realized. Since this plan has been agreed to, violence in Iraq by the Sunni insurgents against American troops has fallen by 30 percent. That is clearly not the result of the surge in American troops. Those additional troops have been assigned, almost exclusively, to the Shiite areas of Baghdad controlled by the Mahdi militia. The Sunni have, with the connivance of Saudi Arabia, substantially curtailed their attacks on American troops following the president's approval of the Saudi peace proposal. The administration, however, will claim this new tactic has succeeded. The attacks by the Sunni on the Shiites following the invasion and occupation by the United States have always been a purely secular power struggle. The Sunni insurgents are remnants of Saddam's old regime. Iraq under Saddam was a secular nation. The hierarchy of that regime was not Muslim fundamentalists, but rather Western-oriented, non-religious Sunni. Saddam would not have tolerated religious fanaticism in his army or the Baath Party of either sect. He could never have remained in power if he did so. His ruthless suppression of the Shiite fundamentalists makes this clear. Saddam understood, as the United States now understands, that Shiite fundamentalism sponsored by Iran is a threat to whomever would govern Iraq. The administration will claim the coming escalation of the violence by the Sunni against the Shiite militia is entirely sectarian in nature. They will claim that American forces cannot hope to stop these attacks and should not attempt to take sides in a struggle inspired by religious intolerance. The opposite, of course, will be true. The administration will support the Sunni, as agreed. Resurgence of Sunni dominance in Iraq, by elimination of the Shiite threat, is the only reasonable, and only practical, course. This simple Saudi plan will have terrible consequences. The reality of the Middle East, however, leaves no other course. (Morgan Strong was an adviser to CBS News' "60 Minutes" on the Middle East. He is a former professor of Middle Eastern History at Mercy College and The State University of New York.) (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.) Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 20 Economic Times: US energy secy to take stock of India's needs GIRISH KUBER TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 03:31:38 AM] MUMBAI: Indo-US nuclear deal talks will be in the limelight this week as Americas energy secretary Samuel Sam Bodman begins his India mission. The focus of Mr Bodmans visit will be Indias ever rising energy needs and nuclear co-operation between the two. He is expected to discuss the issue with Indias nuclear establishment. The first major step towards lifting the 30-year-long nuclear apartheid was taken in July 2005 when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh signed an agreement with US President George Bush in Washington. It promises to recognise India as a responsible nuclear power entitled to benefits and gains denied for three decades. In December 2006, President Bush signed the India-US Civil Nuclear Co-operation Act, named after retiring Congressman Henry Hyde, to allow US corporations to have nuclear trade with India. The Bill, however, needs to be ratified by the American congress as well as the Indian Parliament. However, the legislation faces serious opposition. Several experts and politicians on both sides have been opposing the move citing various reasons. Some US lawmakers have been harping on the fact that India is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and arguing that hence it should not have access to nuclear technology and fuel. In India, some sections argue that the Bill gives the US too much access to Indias nuclear establishment. Some have also pointed out that the proposed legislation seeks a moratorium on India carrying out nuclear tests. Mr Bodman is expected to find a way out of the current impasse, a senior functionary of the nuclear establishment told ET. After meeting the Prime Minister, petroleum and energy ministers and others in Delhi on March 20-21, the US energy minister would fly down to Mumbai on March 22 to meet Anil Kakodkar, head, Atomic Energy Commission, and senior officials of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL), Indias sole nuclear energy generator. A possible breakthrough would pave the way for billions of dollars of business in the energy sector. A large number of US, Canadian, Russian and French companies have been making a beeline for India to grab a pie of the fast expanding domestic energy business. Lobbying has been on for some time. The last to arrive here was a group of 38 US firms, including nuclear energy majors like GE, Bechtel, Edlow International, Nukem, Thorium Power and Westinghouse. GE and Westinghouse (both from US) will be the two biggest beneficiaries of the proposed nuclear deal. girish.kuber@timesgroup.com Copyright 2007 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service ***************************************************************** 21 Economic Times: India has other options too, says Kakodkar- LALITHA VAIDYANATHAN TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 03:32:48 AM] MUMBAI: Ahead of talks on an agreement to operationalise the Indo-US civil nuclear deal, New Delhi has said the Hyde Act significantly deviates from the July 18, 2005 understanding and emphasised that it wants its concerns explicitly addressed. Making it clear that India would retain full privileges outlined in the July 18, 2005 joint statement and the March 2006 separation plan, the countrys top nuclear scientist, Anil Kakodkar, said if the deal does not go through, New Delhi has other options. He said India has already made its concerns known to the US and emphasised that the issue of reprocessing of spent fuel is non-negotiable. We want reprocessing rights up front... Reprocessing is a non-negotiable right, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) chairman told PTI, six days ahead of expert-level discussions here on the 123 agreement that will operationalise the civil nuclear deal. Retaining full privileges as laid out in a joint statement by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President George W Bush on July 18, 2005 and the separation plan of March 2006, India wants all these to be explicitly addressed, said Mr Kakodkar, who has been closely involved in firming up of the deal. Mr Kakodkar said that Indias position was always guided by the July 18, 2005 statement and March 2006 understanding, but the Hyde Act (passed by US congress in December) deviates significantly from that. We expect the negotiators to respect the joint statement of July 18 and the March 2006 separation plan and proceed further by taking into account Indias concerns, which arose after the Hyde Act (that gave US legislative nod to the deal), Mr Kakodkar said. If the 123 agreement does not go through, India has other options, but this will definitely be a setback for the nuclear business community which is aggressively pushing for the deal, he observed. Asked when the crucial negotiations on the deal enabling agreement are going to recommence, the top scientist said, Both India and the US are studying the drafts carefully and serious negotiations would begin fairly soon. About the Hyde Acts stand on ban on conducting atomic tests, he noted that India had declared a unilateral moratorium on nuclear tests, but that cannot become a bilateral legality. He, however, pointed out that the Prime minister has repeatedly assured Parliament that concerns of a section of scientists over the act will be addressed. Copyright 2007 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. For ***************************************************************** 22 DAILY YOMIURI: 2 more N-plants admit past problems with rods Tohoku Electric Power Co. and Chubu Electric Power Co. said Monday that control rods had slipped out of place at their reactors years before a similar incident resulted in a criticality accident in 1999 at Hokuriku Electric Power Co.'s Shika nuclear power plant in Ishikawa Prefecture. The slipping of the rods took place at Tohoku Electric's Onagawa nuclear power plant in July 1988, and at Chubu Electric's Hamaoka nuclear power plant in May 1991. Neither of the incidents led to a criticality accident, so the utilities did not report them to the government. However, if they had released information on the incidents, it could have prevented the criticality accident from occurring at the Shika nuclear power plant's No. 1 reactor in Shikamachi, Ishikawa Prefecture. The three nuclear reactors in question are boiling-water reactors. Fail-safes to prevent control rods from slipping apparently were not functioning. Experts suspect there were common structural defects in the fail-safes. Tohoku Electric's incident occurred at the No. 1 reactor of Onagawa nuclear power plant, which extends across Onagawacho and Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, on July 9, 1988, when the reactor was shut down for a routine inspection. According to the power company, two of the 89 control rods inserted from below into the reactor core slipped when the inspection was about to finish and workers were preparing to draw out the control rods to restart the reactor. The control rods move up and down in a chamber 3.6 meters tall, but one had slipped downward by 15 centimeters from its proper location in the core, and the other by 1.4 meters, according to the power company. The two rods were located away from each other, which prevented a criticality accident--a nuclear fission chain reaction--from occurring, the power company said. A similar incident took place on May 31, 1991, at the No. 3 reactor at Chubu Electric's Hamaoka nuclear power plant in Omaezaki, Shizuoka Prefecture. The reactor also was shut down for an inspection. Although workers did not operate the control rods, which adjust the output of the reactor, three of the 185 rods were out of place. One completely fell out of the reactor core, while the other two moved downward--one by 45 centimeters and the other by 1.2 meters. The trouble also did not reach the point of criticality as the out-of-place rods were separated from each other. The Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said: "There were no criticality accidents or emergency shutdowns, so it is not required that the incidents be reported. We don't think these were cover-ups." The agency also said it did not think there were defects in the reactors' design. The Daily Yomiuri, The Yomiuri Shimbun The Yomiuri Shimbun. ***************************************************************** 23 RIA Novosti: Russia, Kazakhstan presidents to talk trade, energy, security 12:54 | 19/ 03/ 2007 MOSCOW, March 19 (RIA Novosti) - The presidents of Russia and Kazakhstan will meet Monday to discuss steps to intensify trade and cooperation in the energy sphere, a Kremlin official said. "[Vladimir] Putin and [Nursultan] Nazarbayev are expected to discuss a wide range of bilateral strategic cooperation issues," an official said. "They will focus on ways to continue intensifying trade and economic cooperation." He highlighted ties in the nuclear energy sector with the Central Asian state, which holds 15% of the world's uranium reserves. The two countries opened their first joint venture to enrich uranium in Angarsk, East Siberia, as part of Moscow's non-proliferation initiative early last year to create a network of enrichment centers that will also be responsible for the disposal of nuclear waste. Russia has built a $1 billion uranium-mining facility in Kazakhstan, the project that also involved neighboring ex-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Russia is to receive 20,000 metric tons of uranium from the facility, its first uranium-mining venture on foreign soil. Other joint ventures in the sphere include a company in Almaty to focus on innovative power plants based on Soviet submarine reactors. The official said mutual trade had grown 31.2% in 2006, hitting about $13 billion. He added the presidents of the two countries, which are members of an array of post-Soviet economic and security organizations, had held 13 meetings last year. In Moscow, Putin and Nazarbayev will also focus on oil and natural gas projects, including the expected launch of a gas processing plant in Orenburg, Russia's south Urals, which will refine hydrocarbons Kazakhstan's Karachaganak gas deposit and from a nearby deposit, where production volumes have been falling since 1997. Its maximum refining capacity of 30.6 billion cu m, including 15 billion from Kazakhstan will be achieved in 2012. Russia and Kazakhstan are also parties to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, which includes a 935-mile Caspian pipeline linking oil fields in western Kazakhstan to Russia's Black Sea coast and pumping 30 million metric tons of oil per year (604,110 bbl/d). The CPC also comprises Oman and involves Chevron, LUKoil, ExxonMobil, BP, Rosneft, Shell, ENI, BG and KazMunaiGaz. Mineral-rich Kazakhstan has posted some of the strongest GDP growth rates among ex-Soviet states, averaging 9% annually between 2002 and 2005. Its booming energy sector has attracted considerable foreign direct investment. Putin and Nazarbayev will also address regional security issues. RIA Novosti ***************************************************************** 24 Moscow Times: Kazakhs Hail Nuclear Joint Venture Tuesday, March 20, 2007. Issue 3618. Page 5. By Anna Smolchenko Staff Writer Vladimir Rodionov / Itar-Tass Nazarbayev and Putin talking at a meeting Monday. The two leaders discussed joint ventures in the energy sector. President Vladimir Putin and Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev agreed Monday to expand their countries' nuclear efforts in what Nazarbayev touted as "a new landmark in cooperation." Nazarbayev said the two countries would start the joint exploration of uranium mines in Kazakhstan, as well as the joint enrichment and production of nuclear fuel. "I think this will be a new landmark in our cooperation," Nazarbayev said after talks in the Kremlin. Nazarbayev said he had invited Putin to visit Kazakhstan this summer to discuss how to implement the agreements. He said any third country wishing to develop its peaceful nuclear industry would be welcome to use the fuel. In December, Russia and Kazakhstan, the biggest uranium producers in the former Soviet Union, opened the Zarechnoye mine in southern Kazakhstan. Both nations have a 45-percent stake in the venture, in which Russia shares technical know-how with Kazakhstan in exchange for uranium needed to plug a deficit at home. Putin and Nazarbayev also discussed increasing cooperation in energy and space. "We consider it important to focus our efforts on the most popular areas of cooperation -- energy, first and foremost," Putin said, Interfax reported. The two leaders discussed the transit of energy resources and the creation of joint ventures to promote innovations in the fuel and energy industry, Putin said, without giving further details. In comments broadcast on Channel One television, Putin called for the Baikonur Cosmodrome, which Russia leases from Kazakhstan, to be used more effectively and for "the exploration of Caspian resources." Nazarbayev's two-day working visit, which ends Tuesday, comes amid intensifying competition for Kazakhstan's energy resources. Moscow, anxious for Kazakhstan to remain in its realm of influence, is irritated by its projects with the West, which exclude Russia. In June, Kazakhstan joined the U.S-backed Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline running from Azerbaijan to Turkey and bypassing Russia. And in May, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney paid a high-profile visit to Kazakhstan to lobby for U.S. energy interests. In comments that appeared to allay Russia's concerns, Nazarbayev said Kazakhstan and Russia were "not competitors but partners." He said Kazakhstan shipped 43 million tons of oil and 24 billion cubic meters of gas to Russia last year. The European Union has also discussed the possibility of a Europe-bound gas pipeline that would skirt Russia. Energy could also top talks this week between Putin and the presidents of two other former Soviet republics. Nezavisimaya Gazeta reported Monday that Putin would play host this week to Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko and meet separately with Belarussian leader Alexander Lukashenko. A Kremlin spokesman said Yushchenko might visit Russia this week but that it was unclear whether he would meet Putin. The spokesman said he did not know anything about Lukashenko. Over the past year or so, Ukraine and Belarus have been caught in heated disputes with Russia over Gazprom's demands that they pay higher prices for Russian gas. Copyright 2006. The Moscow Times. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 25 RIA Novosti: Atomstroyexport set to build first NPP in Morocco 12:57 | 19/ 03/ 2007 MOSCOW, March 19 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's nuclear equipment export monopoly Atomstroyexport said Monday it plans to build a nuclear power plant in Morocco. Atomstroyexport officials arrive March 19 in Morocco on a working visit to discuss the prospects of developing the nuclear power industry in the North African country, the company's press office said. During the visit, Atomstroyexport representatives plan to visit the Sidi Boulbra site where Morocco's first nuclear power plant is expected to be built. The company's managers and experts are in talks with Morocco's National Electricity Office on the drafting of a feasibility study for the country's first NPP, the press office said. Atomstroyexport has also supplied relevant Moroccan organizations with information on Russian nuclear power plant technologies, the press office said. Atomstroyexport is currently building five nuclear reactor blocks for NPPs in China, India and Iran. In October 2006, the company won a tender to build a plant in Belene, Bulgaria. RIA Novosti ***************************************************************** 26 RIA Novosti: Russia to join nuclear projects in S. Africa - economics min. 15:52 | 19/ 03/ 2007 PRETORIA, March 19 (RIA Novosti) - Russia has expressed readiness to build nuclear power plants in the Republic of South Africa responding to the country's invitation to bid for nuclear projects, while. "We are seeking to diversify existing energy supplies, and have invited Russia to take part in tenders for the implementation of nuclear projects," said Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, Deputy President of the Republic of South Africa, Monday. In turn, Andrei Sharonov, Deputy Economic Development and Trade Minister and a member of the visiting Russian government's delegation led by Premier Mikhail Fradkov, said Monday the Russian Federal Nuclear Power Agency (Rosatom) was ready to take part in the construction of nuclear power plants (NPPs) of various capacities. In addition, he said, Rosatom was considering implementing joint research projects in the nuclear sphere and the prospect of establishing ore mining and processing mills in South Africa. "South Africa has announced the need to diversify investment sources," Sharonov said. "The competition is fierce, but hopefully we will win the tenders [for NPP construction]," the Russian delegate said. Simultaneously, Russia's nuclear equipment export monopoly Atomstroyexport said Monday it plans to build a nuclear power plant in Morocco. Atomstroyexport officials, who arrive March 19 in Morocco on a working visit, will discuss prospects for developing the nuclear power industry in the North African country, the company's press office said. On March 16, the Russian PM set off for a four-day African tour with a view to expanding economic cooperation with African countries. Late last Friday Fradkov met with Angolan President Jose Eduardo Dos Santos in Luanda, the capital of Angola. Russia is ready to participate in the development of mineral deposits in Namibia, Russia's premier said Saturday. Visiting Mikhail Fradkov said talks with Namibian leaders covered issues of cooperation in the prospecting of oil, natural gas, diamonds, gold and copper deposits in the southern African country. A source in the Russian government said Russia had intensified assistance to African countries in the past few years. Among other things, it has already cleared $11.3 billion worth of debt and has made a decision to settle another worth $750 million and to grant $250 million for priority development programs, the fight against infectious diseases and anti-poverty measures. Late February, Techsnabexport, Russia's state-run nuclear exporter, and Russia's leading asset management company, Renova, headed by tycoon Viktor Vekselberg, said they planned to set up joint ventures in South Africa, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. RIA Novosti ***************************************************************** 27 Oshkosh Northwestern: Boaters reminded of security rules around nuke plant Posted March 19, 2007 Nuclear Management Co. and the U.S. Coast Guard are reminding boaters about security rules around Point Beach Nuclear Plant. Buoys designate the area where fishing and boating are prohibited. Buoys are removed during winter but will be replaced in mid-April. The security zone exists even without the buoys in place. Also, the adjacent beach is off limits and signs are posted indicating the security zones. The public fishing pier at Point Beach also is closed. Violators are subject to fines of up to $10,000 and up to 10 years in prison. Richard Ryman/Press-Gazette Contact us at 920-235-7700. thenorthwestern.com is a Gannett Company website. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005. ***************************************************************** 28 NRC: NRC to Discuss 2006 Performance Assessment for Perry Nuclear Power Plant News Release - Region III - 2007-005 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs, Region III 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532 www.nrc.gov CONTACT: E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Painesville, Ohio, on Wednesday, March 21, with representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company to discuss the agency's assessment of safety performance for last year at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located at Perry, Ohio. The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. in the Barberry Room at the Renaissance Quail Hollow Resort, 11080 Concord-Hambden Road, Painesville. In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will also discuss the recent decision to return the Perry plant to normal NRC oversight. Since August 2004 the plant had been under heightened regulatory scrutiny as a result of equipment problems which occurred between 2002 and 2004. Before the meeting is adjourned, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of the Perry plant, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant operation. "The Perry plant continues to operate safely," said James Caldwell, NRC Region III Administrator. “Our decision to return the plant to regular NRC oversight was based on our extensive inspections and reviews of the facility which have led us to conclude that the plant management and staff have made significant improvements in their performance.” "This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss our annual assessment of safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents," Mr. Caldwell continued. "Our goal is to explain the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public about our regulation of these facilities." A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the plant during 2006 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/perr_2006q4.pdf The letter particularly noted significant improvements in the areas of problem identification and resolution and of human performance. These two areas of evaluation are considered “cross cutting” in that they affect plant activities throughout the plant. Their measurable improvement contributed to the NRC’s decision to return the Perry plant to normal oversight. A March 2 letter from the NRC to FirstEnergy detailed the reasons for returning Perry to regular oversight. The letter is available through the NRC’s online document library at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. Performance at the Perry plant is measured through the NRC inspection program and through statistical measures called performance indicators. The significance of inspection findings and performance indicators is measured by a color scale, ranging from “green” for those of minor safety significance, through “yellow” and “white,” to “red” for problems of high safety significance. All inspection findings for the Perry plant in 2006 were “green.” However, the performance indicator that tracks the availability of the plant’s emergency diesel generators to provide onsite power in case offsite power supplies are not available in an emergency was determined to be “white” during the second quarter of 2006. This was due to the frequency of the diesel generators’ failures to start. A followup NRC inspection determined that FirstEnergy adequately evaluated and addressed the problem. The performance indicator returned to “green” in the third quarter of 2006. Routine inspections at the Perry plant are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors and by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency's headquarters in Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are emergency preparedness, effluents and environmental monitoring, and scheduled routine inspection of components and equipment. Current performance information for Perry is available on the NRC's web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PERR1/perr1_chart.html. NRC news releases are available through a free list server subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC Home Page at www.nrc.gov also offers a Subscribe to News link in the News & Information menu. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web Site. Monday, March 19, 2007 ***************************************************************** 29 IHT: U.S. Trilateral Commission debates ways to curb energy use and fight climate change - International Herald Tribune Bloomberg News, Reuters, The Associated Press Published: March 19, 2007 BRUSSELS: The United States must act to cap its emissions of greenhouse gases and join the fight against climate change or risk losing global leadership, a former CIA director said in a report issued Monday. "The United States must adopt a carbon emission control policy," John Deutch, head of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1995-96, said in a report to the Trilateral Commission, a group of business and opinion leaders from Europe, the United States and Asia. Deutch wrote that if the United States or any other country in the Organization for Economic Development "that is a large producer of greenhouse gas emissions is to retain a leadership role in other areas, it cannot just opt out of the global climate change policy process." Deutch, an energy specialist who is now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also proposed an expanded use of nuclear power, international cooperation to develop clean coal technology and a sharing of the costs of emissions control between rich countries and large emerging nations. "If we tax polluting technologies, if we tax polluting resources, then we can certainly change the proportion of environment-friendly" activity in business, Kovacs said. The policy fits with a commitment to curb the use of fossil fuels and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, pledged by leaders of the 27-nation EU at a March 9 summit meeting. Some European politicians see the chance to increase taxes and curb pollution as citizens have become more aware of climate change. At a news conference with Kovacs after opening a conference on taxes and the environment, the German finance minister, Peer Steinbrck, said finance ministers would discuss the issue of using taxation to promote energy conservation as soon as next week. "The understanding and the willingness to pay for it increased," Steinbrck said. Just Monday, the Belgian government agreed on fresh budgetary measures to cut pollution and counter climate change. It imposed taxes on the use of disposable shopping bags, foils and cutlery and on the use of carbon dioxide-polluting cars, which should yield 131 million, or $175 million, in additional income for 2007. The government also would provide fiscal incentives for people using environmentally friendly energy. The European Commission, the EU executive agency where Kovacs oversees taxation, has proposed raising taxes on diesel fuel in some countries and linking car taxes to how much the vehicles emit in carbon dioxide and other pollutants. Kovacs, who in November urged a shift of tax burdens away from labor to emissions, will explore further steps in a policy paper due March 28. At the Trilateral Commission meeting, Deutch advocated an additional tax of about $1 a gallon, or 26 cents a liter, on gasoline, diesel fuel and other petroleum products in the United States, coupled with a tightening of fuel economy standards for U.S. car manufacturers, to encourage fuel efficiency and damp demand, while recognizing that such a move would be politically difficult. He suggested that Washington use the same "cap and trade" system of limiting carbon dioxide emissions and issuing emissions permits to industry that can be traded, which the EU currently uses. Deutch also listed so-called geotechnical measures under consideration to counterbalance climate change, including adding aerosols to the stratosphere, placing balloons or mirrors in the stratosphere and even "high altitude nuclear explosions to induce a nuclear 'spring.'" These ideas were so risky and hard to demonstrate technically that they highlighted the need to redouble efforts to mitigate human-induced climate change. While Deutch placed great expectations on carbon capture and sequestration technology to reduce emissions from coal-fired power stations, notably in China, a parallel report to the Trilateral Commission by a French energy executive, Anne Lauvergeon, cast doubt on that solution. Lauvergeon, chief executive of Areva, which builds nuclear power stations, said the capture and storage of carbon emitted through the burning of fossil fuels was too often presented as a miracle solution. This technology would "not play a significant role in the limitation of carbon emissions for half a century," she wrote. Copyright 2007 the International Herald Tribune All rights reserved ***************************************************************** 30 Reuters: More Japanese utilities admit nuclear incidents Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:01AM GMT TOKYO (Reuters) - More Japanese utilities admitted on Monday they had failed to report past incidents in which nuclear fuel rods were mishandled at their reactors. Industry experts said even more past nuclear lapses might come to light because Japan's Trade Ministry in November ordered all utilities to investigate power plant records and report the findings to the government by the end of March, a process the ministry said would help improve the industry's safety controls. "I would not think this is the end of the story," said an industry analyst who asked not to be named. "It is quite possible we will see more of these cases." Japan's third-largest utility, Chubu Electric Power Co., said the mishandling happened at the No. 2 nuclear reactor at its Hamaoka plant, western Japan, in May 1991 while it was shut for regular inspections. Fourth-ranked Tohoku Electric Power Co. said it had a similar case at the No. 1 unit at its Onagawa nuclear power plant in July 1988. It was also shut for inspections at the time, a company official said. Utilities are now required to report all such incidents to the authorities, although that was not the case in 1991 and 1988. The admissions follow a disclosure last week by another Japanese utility, Hokuriku Electric Power Co., that it had covered up a similar incident in 1999. Chubu Electric said that there was no cover-up at the 1991 incident. Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. | Learn more about Reuters ***************************************************************** 31 Reuters: Ex-CIA chief says U.S. must act on climate Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:45PM EDT By Paul Taylor BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The United States must act to cap its emissions of greenhouse gases and join the fight against climate change or risk losing global leadership, a former CIA director said in a report released on Monday. "The United States must adopt a carbon emission control policy," John Deutch, head of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1995-96, said in a report to the Trilateral Commission, a grouping of business and opinion leaders from Europe, the United States and Asia. "If the United States or any other OECD country that is a large producer of greenhouse gas emissions is to retain a leadership role in other areas, it cannot just opt out of the global climate change policy process," he wrote. Deutch, an energy specialist who is now a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, also proposed an expanded use of nuclear power, international cooperation to develop clean coal technology and a sharing of the costs of emissions control between rich countries and large emerging nations. He advocated an additional tax of about $1 per gallon on gasoline, diesel and other petroleum products in the United States, coupled with a tightening of fuel economy standards for U.S. car manufacturers, to encourage fuel efficiency and dampen demand, while recognizing that would be politically difficult. CAP AND TRADE He suggested Washington use the same "cap and trade" system of limiting carbon dioxide emissions and issuing emissions permits to industry that can be traded, which the European Union currently uses. Continued... Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 32 UPI: Austria against nuclear deal with India United Press International - Energy - 3/19/2007 1:52:00 PM -0400 NEW DELHI, March 19 (UPI) -- Austria's foreign minister said during a visit in New Delhi her country is likely to not support India's entrance into the Nuclear Suppliers Group. Ursula Plassnik said allowing India, which has not signed key anti-weapons treaties, into the NSG could hurt the nonproliferation regime. "We will as members of the NSG have a careful look," Plassnik said, DailyIndia.com reports. The United States and India have struck a tentative deal that would allow India access to nuclear technology and equipment for its energy program. It would need approval from the International Atomic Energy Agency and the NSG to ensure supply of fuel. But NSG does not admit any country that hasn't agreed to certain weapons terms. The NSG could vote as early as next month on India's acceptance. The United States, Russia, France and Britain all back India. Japan and other ardent anti-weapons states could stall it though. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 33 Prague Daily Monitor: President criticises minister over Temelin By Prague Daily Monitor/CTK / Published 19 March 2007 Innsbruck, Austria, March 16 (CTK) - Czech President Vaclav Klaus today criticised Environment Minister Martin Bursik (Greens) over Bursik's statements about the Temelin nuclear power plant. Klaus told journalists in Innsbruck that Bursik should realise that he was a member of the Czech government and that he should represent its interests, and not the interests of the Greens lobby in Austria. Bursik told the Austrian daily Der Standard on Thursday that Prague could not discuss the objections to the plant with Austria unless Austria formulates its official reservations. Klaus said that problems around Temelin unfortunately dominated the bilateral relations between the Czech Republic and Austria, although the two countries had good relations in many areas. The Czech president today received an honorary doctorate from Innsbruck University for his social and political activities, mainly for his contribution to present relations between Czechs and their neighbours, university vice-chancellor Manfried Gantner said. In his address during the ceremonial event, Klaus presented his view of the development of EU integration and of environmentalism as an ideological attitude towards environment protection. Innsbruck professor Dieter Lukesch said in the laudation that Klaus is a man characterised by love to his homeland and love to economy, which both contributed to the reconstruction of democracy in the Czech Republic. Klaus recalled that the Austrian economic school was a great inspiration for the Czech reforms of the 1990s. Klaus also told journalists that it seemed incredible that Germany wanted to have the EU constitution passed again. He said Europe now had to discuss its future and without such a discussion no constitution could be written. This story copyright 2007 CTK Czech News Agency The Prague Daily Monitor and Monitor CE are not responsible for its content. copyright 2007 monitor ce media services s.r.o. | all rights reserved ***************************************************************** 34 England's Northwest: Nuclear contractor wins Cumbria bid A nuclear contracting firm, which has operations in the northwest, has won a 4 million deal to carry out decommissioning work at Sellafield. NUKEM will create a pilot project as part of the rundown of the plant, which will lead to the removal of two heat-exchanger vessels. Managers said the deal places the firm in an ideal position to bid for more contracts throughout the UK. NUKEM northern regional director John Ball said: "By winning such a high-profile British Nuclear Group Sellafield contract, NUKEM has established itself as a key supplier in Cumbria." The firm will also undertake surveys, testing, mechanical and electrical works, demolition and safe storage. Companies in the NUKEM Group are active in Germany, the US and France, as well as the UK. ***************************************************************** 35 AFP: Russia, S.Africa to co-operate on nuclear technology - Mon Mar 19, 12:44 PM ET JOHANNESBURG (AFP) - South African Deputy President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka and Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov agreed Monday to work together on developing nuclear and space technology as they met in Pretoria. The two countries also agreed to foster closer working links in the fields of astronomy, defence and peaceful use of nuclear energy, they told reporters after their talks. "We focused (during the meeting) on areas of co-operation in high-tech areas, nuclear, space technology, enhancing of co-operation of South African institutions involved in these areas," Mlambo-Ngcuka said. "We are also interested in joint ventures that will facilitate technology acquisition after the meeting," she added. Fradkov arrived in South Africa, the third stop on his African tour, on Saturday after visiting Namibia and Angola. His visit came a month after Moscow's representatives led by Natural Resources Minister Yuri Trutnev agreed to help Pretoria in mining and generating nuclear power. Russia agreed in February to assist South Africa, a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty signatory, to build its second nuclear power station. Mlambo-Ngcuka and Fradkov also established a Joint South Africa-Russia Business Council in an effort to increase co-operation in business between the two countries whose trade relations now standing at 420 million US dollars. "We hope this would lead to increased interaction and bring trade to a new level. Everything we do at this stage is aimed specifically at increasing economic co-operation to new heights," Fradkov told reporters. Mlambo-Ngcuka said the council would help South Africa in expanding volumes of its export to Russia, especially in vehicles and chemicals which "were still low". Fradkov's visit to the country follow that of President Vladmir Putin in September where he signed a series of agreements with President Thabo Mbeki, with Russia agreeing to supply nuclear fuel to South African's Cape Town nuclear plant until 2010. Although Moscow was one of the main backers of South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) party during the former apartheid era, Western Europe has been the main trade partner for South Africa since the end of whites-only rule 12 years ago. Fradkov was expected to pay a courtesy visit to Mbeki later Monday. Copyright 2007 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 36 Vermont Guardian: Vermont's attorney general joins VY complaint By Shay Totten | Vermont Guardian Posted March 19, 2007 MONTPELIER — Vermont has joined six other states in a petition to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission asking them to assess the vulnerability of spent nuclear fuel storage at reactors before they are allowed to extend their operating licenses. The request is made in support of a petition before the NRC filed by the Massachusetts attorney general, asking them to set new national rules for how reactor safeguards are evaluated. In recent weeks, anti-nuclear activists, a number of Windham County lawmakers — along with the entire Progressive Caucus — have been urging Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell to jump into the fight surrounding Entergy’s request to extend the operating license of Vermont Yankee beyond 2012. “We’d love to see him actively involved as I think he’s a good advocate for the state’s positions and this is an issue of central importance to the people of Vermont,” said Rep. Dick Marek, D-Newfane, who penne the original letter that went from a number of county lawmakers. “I don’t see a reason why the NRC would be unwilling to look at it this issue in a broader context, as it seems to me that it’s a set of fundamental questions that deserve answers,” added Marek. Without any urging however, Sorrell had given the OK in December to join a multi-state letter of support to a petition filed by the Massachusetts attorney general. None of the lawmakers, nor the activists urging Sorrell’s involvement, were made aware of this by the attorney general’s office. While Sorrell considered sending a letter solely from Vermont, he opted for a multi-state effort. “We often work with other states and the thought was if you get several states it’s not just a backyard argument, it’s a national issue and an issue based on the merits and not just the concerns of one state,” said Bill Griffin, chief assistant attorney general. The Massachusetts Attorney General argued in a petition before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board — an advisory panel to the NRC —that officials needed to weigh the power station’s vulnerability to a terrorist attack due to the increased onsite storage of nuclear waste as a result of its recent power uprate and the additional storage needed to accommodate the proposed license extension. The ALSB, and the NRC, rejected those arguments, with the final denial coming March 15. Massachusetts then separately requested to have the NRC embark on a national rulemaking change. The deadline to file comments in support of their petition was March 19. Sorrell joined six other attorneys general in a show of support. The letter had been circulated to all 50 attorneys general, but only Connecticut, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont signed on. “As you know, every nuclear power plant in the United States hosts a high-density fuel storage pool, and the inventory of spent fuel continues to mount without any clear prospect for removal and permanent disposal. Recent reports by the National Academy of Sciences, the NRC’s own technical staff and independent experts contradict the NRC’s assertion that high-density fuel storage pools pose no significant environmental risk,” the letter states. “Instead, these studies show that fuel storage pools are susceptible to fire and radiological release from a wide range of conditions, including natural phenomena, operator error, equipment failure, or intentional attack.” The attorneys general contend in their letter that the environmental impacts of a fire in a spent fuel pool may extend over a larger area than a single state boundary, and may have an impact for decades. “In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks and other new and significant information, the NRC’s outdated conclusion — that fuel pool storage risks are insignificant — is no longer defensible,” the letter adds. Late last year, the Ninth Circuit U.S Court of Appeals ruled that the NRC was responsible for addressing the impacts of an intentional attack. The ruling —which stems from a California case involving Pacific Gas & Electric — was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but was rebuffed. NRC officials disagree with the Ninth Circuit’s interpretation, and have said it does not apply in the Vermont Yankee case. That is what prompted Massachusetts to request a rulemaking change. The NRC has refused to suspend the relicensure hearings while it takes up the rulemaking change. However, if the NRC were to change rules they could apply to the Vermont Yankee application and its generic environmental impact statement (GEIS). Tuesday, Mar. 20, 2007 Northern Vermont: PO Box 335, Winooski, VT 05404 Southern Vermont: 139 Main Street, Suite 603, Brattleboro, VT 05301 Contact: 802.861.4880 (ph) | 802.861.6388 (fax) | 877.231.5382 (toll-free) 2007 Vermont Guardian | Visit us: www.vermontguardian.com This document can be located online: www.vermontguardian.com/local/032007/SorrellVY.shtml ***************************************************************** 37 KnoxNews: ReNuke plans to staff nation?s nuclear rebirth By FRANK MUNGER, munger@knews.com March 19, 2007 Oak Ridge is decidedly pro-nuclear, a town at ease with its atomic roots. It's a place where people don't do a second take when they see a sign on the office door, "Gone fission." Based on that background, one would have to assume Oak Ridge is a sweet home for a company staking its future on the health - and growth - of the nuclear industry. ReNuke is such a company, whose founders want to help staff the coming of a nuclear renaissance in the United States. Ian Howard, general manager of ReNuke, said he and other senior managers are confident of a resurgence, spurred by new plant construction and plans for reprocessing operations that would convert spent fuel from reactors into a new fuel source. "We're all nukes," Howard said of he and his colleagues. "I've been an unabashed advocate of nuclear power since 1974." ReNuke was launched in January, but Howard said it already has about 250 nuclear professionals and technical experts lined up to staff projects, including nuclear plant design and development. "We're really just getting started," he said. In a prepared statement, the company's president, John Coffman, said: "Nuclear industry experts say that more than 90,000 new workers will be required over the next four to five years in order to meet the needs of commercial and government initiatives to accelerate nuclear power development. Finding the right professionals to meet the growing need for experienced personnel is one of the greatest challenges to the rebirth of nuclear power. That is why ReNuke is such a valuable tool in identifying and hiring top people for staff augmentation." ReNuke is the progeny of DeNuke, a company that Coffman and Vice President Fred Gardner founded five years ago to provide staffing for nuclear decommissioning projects and cleanups in the aftermath of natural disasters. Howard said DeNuke still has a dozen or so staff members working on post-Katrina projects. DeNuke had "a little over" $10 million in revenues last year, Howard said, and the company projects about $3 million to $4 million in work for ReNuke in its first year. Offices for both companies are in the Pine Ridge office complex on Illinois Avenue in Oak Ridge. According to Howard, ReNuke managers spend a lot of time evaluating resumes of would-be prospects for the company's staffing corral. Each time ReNuke supplies personnel for a project, the company's reputation is on the line. There are plenty of talented "road warriors" in the nuclear industry, Howard said, describing people who keep their suitcases packed and ready for the next adventure. ReNuke tries to match willing warriors with utilities and companies interested in building nuclear plants, and Howard said there are discussions under way. He said ReNuke can provide temporary staffing in a hurry. If a company decides to hire one of the people on a permanent basis, ReNuke receives a finder's fee, he said. While shopping for business, ReNuke is equally busy recruiting engineers and other professionals who want to work on a project-by-project basis and still enjoy "long-term support" and compensation, Howard said. For more information, go to www.renuke.com or call (865) 220-0046. BWXT sets pace in mentoring BWXT Y-12, the managing contractor at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant, recently signed eight new mentor-protege agreements - seven with small businesses and one with Southern University, a historically black institution. BWXT now has 20 such agreements under the Department of Energy program that's designed to assist small and disadvantaged firms. Y-12 has more mentor-protege relationships than any other facility in the U.S. nuclear weapons complex, officials said. During Feb. 20 ceremonies in Oak Ridge, BWXT signed new agreements with RAM/VITEC Inc. of Knoxville; BR2C of Huntsville, Ala.; Cavanaugh Services Group Inc. of Salt Lake City; DCS Electronics Inc. of Maryville; Elvado Environmental of Knoxville; McConnell Jones Lanier & Murphy of Houston; and Microwave Synergy of Chattanooga. Southern University is based in Baton Rouge, La. ORNL, Enterra collaborate _on security project Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Enterra Solutions LLC announced plans to work together to develop a civil defense infrastructure for the 21st century. The project, through a $5 million, five-year cooperative research and development agreement, will reportedly mesh Enterra's Enterprise Resilience Management Solution with ORNL's SensorNet systems. According to a press statement, the result will be a "sense-think-act" capability called ResilienceNet, with application for defense and homeland security. ORNL's cool after school Oak Ridge National Laboratory was named one of the best places to work for postdocs in the 5th annual survey by The Scientist magazine. It was the only one of the DOE's national laboratories to make the Top 15 (ORNL was No. 15 on a list headed by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.) The survey asked postdocs about such things as the quality of mentoring at an institution and opportunities for career development. Asked about the ranking, lab spokesman Billy Stair said, "We are encouraged that young scientists view ORNL among the nation's best labs for their early career. An important part of our (recruiting) strategy is the belief that in addition to producing great science, Oak Ridge should also be a great place to work and live." Senior writer Frank Munger covers the Department of Energy and its contractors in Oak Ridge. Copyright 2007, Knoxville News Sentinel Co. ***************************************************************** 38 UPI: Outside View: U.S.-Russia space tensions United Press International - Security & Terrorism - 3/19/2007 4:19:00 PM -0400 By ANDREI KISLYAKOV UPI Outside View Commentator MOSCOW, March 19 (UPI) -- "In the exploration of outer space, we (the Soviet Union/Russia and the United States) were not only partners, but also rivals, and that rivalry has brought excellent results," Russian ambassador to the United States Yuri Ushakov told a State Department forum in late February to mark the bicentennial of diplomatic relations between the two countries. "Then came the era of manned space exploration and our rivalry continued, strengthening our industrial and technological potentials," the ambassador concluded. Meanwhile, amid the celebratory speeches, the stark reality of our own day is that a new theater of military operations is fast emerging: near-Earth space. Right off, I would like to pre-empt any remarks about the difference between the peaceful exploration of space and cooperation in that field, and the militarization of the universe; in theory, the difference exists. But in the stark daily reality of competition, or, to be objective, confrontation, in outer space, the "excellent results" took the shape of a strategic arms race and an extreme exacerbation of tensions between the "partners," while "the strengthening of industrial and technological potentials" in practice meant an extreme degree of militarization of the country's economy. To be more exact, we allowed the latter to happen in the mid-1980s. But, as history has been proven to move in a circle, the future may have equally "remarkable" achievements in store for us. The years 1957 and 1961 were, without exaggeration, a turning point in world civilization. In the former case, the possibility of an orbital flight was proven, and in the latter a human circled the Earth. Both these landmark events confirmed the unlimited potential of rocket and space technology. However, the imagination of the potential enemies of the time did not go beyond the military aspect. The Americans carried out anti-satellite tests as early as September 1959. In May 1962 U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara approved the deployment of the first anti-satellite program (later known as Program 505) using solid-fuel Nike-Zeus interceptors as anti-satellite weapons. And so on. The Soviet Union was not to be outdone. When, in 1948, Walter Dornberger, former head of the German rocket research center at Peenemunde and the father of the American space program, suggested placing an atomic bomb in space so that it could be dropped on any point and thus be an effective deterrent, the Soviet Union took his words literally and throughout the 1960s worked hard on "orbital bombardment" and "fractional orbital bombardment" programs. It was not until October 1967 that the Treaty on the Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and other Celestial Bodies came into effect. It committed the participants not to place nuclear and other types of weapons in outer space or on celestial bodies. But by the time the treaty was signed, the Soviet Union and the United States had been vigorously pursuing military space programs for a decade. Needless to say, neither country was prepared to renounce the goal of achieving strategic superiority by improving missile technologies and developing space strike capabilities. One should note in particular the disastrous tendency of the time to counter force with force. At least it was disastrous for the Soviet Union. Soviet military programs monopolized the national space endeavor and bled civil programs white. What impressed the Soviet Union most of all was the Star Wars program initiated by President Reagan after his two famous speeches in March 1983. Referring to the Soviet Union as an "evil empire" the president announced plans to create a nuclear shield over America to protect it against the malign imperium. But while the Americans never quite believed that a global anti-missile defense system was possible, Moscow had few such doubts. It concluded that the Americans were trying to tilt the strategic balance in their favor in order to launch a surprise nuclear attack. The upshot of such a position for the Soviet Union was an unprecedented build-up of defenses, notably space strike systems, which was a major cause of the collapse of the socialist economy. Times have changed of course. But space programs have returned to the foreground. Which means that we may see more "excellent results" of the space race. (Andrei Kislyakov is a political commentator for the RIA Novosti news agency. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti.) (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.) Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 39 [NukeNet] The mountain that will spit poison Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:17:40 -0800 The mountain that will spit poison (http://www.dailysouthtown.com/news/lang/300276,171LNG1.article) March 18, 2007 Mother Earth is not for sale. That's what the Western Shoshone National Council has told the U.S. government. The Nation was offered pennies per acre for their land in parts of Nevada, Utah, Idaho and into California, but the Nation's council said: No deal. The U.S. government said, "Yes deal," and moved in. We needed a radioactive waste dump there, and a place to test nukes. In 2005, the Western Shoshone council filed a lawsuit claiming the land is theirs under an 1863 treaty. They further claim that the Bush administration's 2002 approval of one tract of the land -- Yucca Mountain -- for a nuclear waste repository, violates both the treaty and, in turn, the U.S. Constitution, which their lawsuit points out makes treaties "supreme." I keep my little copy of the Constitution handy when I write. Let me check that. Yup. It does say that, in Article 6. "All treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby." The treaty made with the Western Shoshone allows only five uses of the land by the U.S. government; settlements, mines, ranches, railroads and roads. Any use beyond the five listed must be approved by both the U.S. government and the Western Shoshone National Council, the treaty states. And to add intrigue, there's gold in them thar hills. Ten percent of the world's supply and 64 percent of U.S. gold comes from this desert site, where mountainsides are blasted up tract by tract and the rubble treated with cyanide-laced water, to get the gold out. No one anticipated, back in the days of cowboys and Indians and dirty gold miners, that we would need a place to hide radioactive waste for 10,000 years, lest it poison and deform us all. But that day has come, thanks to science and the ethical deficiencies of mankind. After years of scouting out the best reservation property to use for the really big nuke-dump-to-end-all-nuke-dumps, the Bush administration picked Yucca Mountain in 2002. This was after the U.S. military had already established a nuclear test site nearby, on land included in the 1863 treaty -- a spread the size of Maine, with its own volcano and fault lines. Last's week's column was not long enough to explain this travesty. Nevada's governor in 2002 immediately vetoed the generous approval of a nuke dump in Nevada, only to have the U.S. Congress override that veto. Nevada last week protested the legislation that a sweat-soaked Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman was again pressing urgently along. Nevada is resisting, as is the Western Shoshone Nation. How, then, does the U.S. government explain or justify its violation of an apparently legitimate treaty, authorized by Ulysses S. Grant in 1863? That's what the United Nations wanted to know, after the Western Shoshone Nation's council in 2005 filed an urgent action request with the U.N. Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Several excuses have been floated. The first and most predictable is that the treaty was merely a friendly agreement. The old, "just kidding," defense. That's the least obscene reason. The Earth Island Institute reports that when the Western Shoshone National Council refused to give up the land for a radioactive waste dump in exchange for money, politicians said the takeover was legitimate because -- pause here and perhaps be seated -- POLLS showed many of the tribe's members want the deal. Never mind letting the Nation settle its own disagreement. Never mind dealing with its rightful representatives. Need I point out the irony of this whopper to my readers? For slow folks, this is a case of convenient governing: We can toss out the representative form when it suits us in mowing over native peoples, but we can use the representative system to mow over the people of Nevada. And why should Chicago's Southland readers care? The official state Web site reports that Illinois stores more radioactive waste at its eight temporary sites than any other state, with a heap in Grundy County. Lemont and Morris were on the radar for industry expansion projects when the Department of Energy visited less than one month ago. ComEd's Zion plant has shut down, but its LaSalle reactors are still pumping out the power and the "spent fuel." It's piling up, and once a home for the big dump is finagled, all that radioactive garbage will be moving around. If that doesn't scare you, maybe this will: To the Western Shoshone, Yucca Mountain is Snake Mountain, a place of prayer and of reputed powerful spiritual energy. One of the Nation's traditional stories is that Snake Mountain will one day be awakened and will split open and spit out poison. Before you sneer, think about that radioactive waste, sleeping safely in its giant tube beneath Snake Mountain, and think of that volcano across the valley, and the nuclear test site not so far away, and the unusual subterranean river system below this part of the desert. What we put in the mountain may not stay in the mountain. /Daily Southtown columnist Marlene Lang can be reached at blackbirdlang@yahoo.com ">blackbirdlang@yahoo.com./ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The lowest standards of ethics of which a right-thinking man can possibly conceive is taught to the common soldier whose trade is to shoot his fellow men. In youth he may have learned the command, 'Thou shalt not kill,' but the ruler takes the boy just as he enters manhood and teaches him that his highest duty is to shoot a bullet through his neighbor's heart - and this, unmoved by passion or feeling or hatred, and without the least regard to right or wrong, but simply because his ruler gives the word." Clarence Darrow, Resist Not Evil The mountain that will spit poison Mother Earth is not for sale. That's what the Western Shoshone National Council has told the U.S. government. The Nation was offered pennies per acre for their land in parts of Nevada, Utah, Idaho and into California, but the Nation's council said: No deal. The U.S. government said, "Yes deal," and moved in. We needed a radioactive waste dump there, and a place to test nukes. In 2005, the Western Shoshone council filed a lawsuit claiming the land is theirs under an 1863 treaty. They further claim that the Bush administration's 2002 approval of one tract of the land -- Yucca Mountain -- for a nuclear waste repository, violates both the treaty and, in turn, the U.S. Constitution, which their lawsuit points out makes treaties "supreme." I keep my little copy of the Constitution handy when I write. Let me check that. Yup. It does say that, in Article 6. "All treaties ma de, or which shall be made, under the author ity of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby." The treaty made with the Western Shoshone allows only five uses of the land by the U.S. government; settlements, mines, ranches, railroads and roads. Any use beyond the five listed must be approved by both the U.S. government and the Western Shoshone National Council, the treaty states. And to add intrigue, there's gold in them thar hills. Ten percent of the world's supply and 64 percent of U.S. gold comes from this desert site, where mountainsides are blasted up tract by tract and the rubble treated with cyanide-laced water, to get the gold out. No one anticipated, back in the days of cowboys and Indians and dirty gold miners, that we would need a place to hide radioactive waste for 10,000 years, lest it poison and defo rm us all. Bu t that day has come, thanks to science and the ethical deficiencies of mankind. After years of scouting out the best reservation property to use for the really big nuke-dump-to-end-all-nuke-dumps, the Bush administration picked Yucca Mountain in 2002. This was after the U.S. military had already established a nuclear test site nearby, on land included in the 1863 treaty -- a spread the size of Maine, with its own volcano and fault lines. Last's week's column was not long enough to explain this travesty. Nevada's governor in 2002 immediately vetoed the generous approval of a nuke dump in Nevada, only to have the U.S. Congress override that veto. Nevada last week protested the legislation that a sweat-soaked Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman was again pressing urgently along. Nevada is resisting, as is the Western Shoshone Nation. How, then, does the U.S. government explain or justify its violation of an apparently legitimate treaty, authorized by Ulysses S. Grant in 1863? That's what the United Nations wanted to know, after the Western Shoshone Nation's council in 2005 filed an urgent action request with the U.N. Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Several excuses have been f loated. The first and most predictable is that the treaty was merely a friendly agreement. The old, "just kidding," defense. That's the least obscene reason. The Earth Island Institute reports that when the Western Shoshone National Council refused to give up the land for a radioactive waste dump in exchange for money, politicians said the takeover was legitimate because -- pause here and perhaps be seated -- POLLS showed many of the tribe's members want the deal . Never mind letting the Nation settle its own disagreement. Never mind dealing with its rightful representatives. Need I point out the irony of this whopper to my readers? For slow folks, this is a case of convenient governing: We can toss out the representative form when it suits us in mowing over native peoples, but we can use the representative system to mow over the people of Nevada. And why should Chicago's Southland readers care? The official state Web site reports that Illinois stores more radioactive waste at its eight temporary sites than any other state, with a heap in Grundy County. Lemont and Morris were on the radar for industry expansion projects when the Department of Energy visited less than one month ago. ComEd's Zion plant has shut down, but its LaSalle reactors are still pumping out the power and the "spent fuel." It's piling up, and once a home for the big dump is finagled, all that radioact ive garbage will be moving around. If that doesn't scare you, maybe this will: To the Western Shoshone, Yucca Mountain is Snake Mountain, a place of prayer and of reputed powerful spiritual energy. One of the Nation's traditional stories is that Snake Mountain will one day be awakened and will split open and spit out poison. Before you sneer, think about that radioactive waste, sleeping safely in its giant tube beneath Snake Mountain, and think of that volcano across the valley, and the nuclear test site not so far away, and the unusual subterranean river system below this part of the desert. What we put in the mountain may not stay in the mountain. Daily Southtown columnist Marlene Lang can be reached at blackbirdlang@yahoo.com "The lowest standards of ethics of which a right-thinking man can possibly conceive is taught to the common soldier whose trade is to shoot his fellow men. In youth he may have learned the command, 'Thou shalt not kill,' but the ruler takes the boy just as he enters manhood and teaches him that his highest duty is to shoot a bullet through his neighbor's heart - and this, unmoved by passion or feeling or hatred, and without the least regard to right or wrong, but simply because his ruler gives the word." Clarence Darrow, Resist Not Evil

***************************************************************** 40 Vermont Guardian: New KI pills ready for residents near Vermont Yankee March 19, 2007 Headlines | BURLINGTON — The Vermont Department of Health wants residents in the emergency planning zones around the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station to know that potassium iodide tablets, distributed since April 2002 are about to expire. New supplies of potassium iodide are expected to arrive in Vermont by mid-April. A public meeting about potassium iodide is scheduled for 7 p.m. Tuesday at the American Legion Hall in Brattleboro for people in the six emergency planning zone towns of Brattleboro, Dummerston, Guilford, Halifax, Marlboro and Vernon. Staff from the Vermont Department of Health and Vermont Emergency Management will explain plans for re-distribution. They will also discuss plans for the initial distribution of liquid potassium iodide. Potassium iodide (also known as KI) is a drug that can block exposure to radioactive iodine if taken in an appropriate and timely dosage. Radioactive iodine is one of the contaminants that may be released in a nuclear accident or similar event. Exposure to radioactive iodine can increase the risk of thyroid cancer. “There is no substitute for following emergency instructions, such as shelter-in-place or evacuation orders,” said Acting Health Commissioner Sharon Moffatt. “But potassium iodide is one protection we can distribute in advance and that’s why we began offering it five years ago. The Health Department will issue instructions if and when potassium iodide is to be taken, in the event of a nuclear emergency.” Potassium iodide has been available to anyone who works or lives in the six towns, as part of Vermont’s emergency preparedness effort. The distribution program provides one dose per person, and participation is voluntary. Parents/guardians are also eligible to receive a free dose for each child in their family. Public schools, nursing homes, hospitals, some childcare providers and private schools also have KI distribution plans in place. Between 2002 and 2004, approximately 14,000 tablets received from the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission were distributed by the Health Department District Office in Brattleboro, and by several local pharmacies. “If you participated in our distribution program, you will have potassium iodide tablets that are marked to expire at the end of March,” said Moffatt. “We have word from the federal Food & Drug Administration that the potassium iodide will still be effective up to two years beyond its marked expiration date, if it has been stored as directed on the package instructions — kept dry in its foil packet at room temperature.” The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently issued a two-year extension of the expiration date for supplies of KI that have been properly stored by the state. These supplies are considered to be effective until 2009. By April, Vermont officials expect to get a new supply of KI in the form of 130 mg tablets (the full adult dose) and 65 mg tablets (the full child dose) that will not expire for seven more years. In addition, the state now has a supply of liquid KI, which is easier to administer to children and others who may have difficulty taking tablets. Liquid KI will be distributed to childcare centers and schools. More information about the Vermont KI distribution program can be located online. UVM hockey co-captain signs pro contract BURLINGTON —Junior co-captain Torrey Mitchell has signed a professional contract with the San Jose Sharks and will not return for his senior season at the University of Vermont. Mitchell and San Jose made the announcement today. Mitchell, of Greenfield Park, Quebec, will complete his junior year academically this spring, and plans to continue his education at UVM by taking summer and online courses to earn the remaining credits needed to finish his degree in the near future. “This is an opportunity I could not pass up,” Mitchell said. “After consulting with my family, coaches and advisor this is the best decision for me. It was a dream of mine to play college hockey and I was able to develop, as a student-athlete here at Vermont and it’s something I’ll cherish forever.” Hockey coach Kevin Sneddon said Mitchell would be missed. "Torrey is the best two-way player I have coached to date,” said Sneddon. “His work ethic, competitiveness, and overall skill package makes him ready for the next level. We will certainly miss him next season, but we wish him the best of luck as he progresses toward playing in the National Hockey League. We are all very proud of him." Sneddon said when he and Mitchell discussed the junior going pro, he made the player promise to finish his education from UVM. Mitchell was named an Honorable Mention Hockey East All-Star this season and finished the year with 12 goals and 23 assists for 35 points to lead Vermont in scoring. His 35 points ranked 14th best in Hockey East and his 23 assists were seventh best. Mitchell finished his career with 35 goals and 70 assists for 105 points in 110 games to rank tied for 35th on UVM’s all-time scoring list. As a sophomore during the 2005-06 season he was named an Honorable Mention Hockey East All-Star and as a freshman he was named to the ECAC All-Rookie Team. Mitchell was a fourth-round pick (126th overall) by the San Jose Sharks. He will report to San Jose’s AHL affiliate, the Worcester Sharks this week. The Vermont men’s hockey team finished the 2006-07 season at 18-16-5 overall and 12-10-5 in Hockey East play. Posted March 16, 2007 Northern Vermont: PO Box 335, Winooski, VT 05404 Southern Vermont: 139 Main Street, Suite 603, Brattleboro, VT 05301 Contact: 802.861.4880 (ph) | 802.861.6388 (fax) | 877.231.5382 (toll-free) 2007 Vermont Guardian | Visit us: www.vermontguardian.com This document can be located online: www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/032007/031907.shtml ***************************************************************** 41 Oshkosh Northwestern: Proposed emission rules stir debate Posted March 19, 2007 Gov. Doyle's rules would exceed federal regulations By Richard Ryman rryman@greenbaypressgazette.com Proposed regulations to reduce mercury emissions from electric generating plants by 90 percent by 2020 are stirring debate about pollution, utility costs and nuclear power. On Thursday, the state Department of Natural Resources, responding to a request by Gov. Jim Doyle, proposed rules that would exceed those of the federal government and remove Wisconsin from a national program which would allow utilities to buy credits for out-of-compliance plants. Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the state's largest business group, said the new regulations will increase electric rates and make the state less competitive. "We had hoped the DNR would allow participation in the federal trading program because it gives us flexibility and allows us to cover some unexpected emergency events that can occur in your system," said Connie Lawniczak, director of environmental services for Wisconsin Public Service Corp., Green Bay. "Federal environmental rules are typically developed after years of research, evaluation, and consideration of feedback from stakeholders. Every time our state regulators think they know better and go beyond what the rest of the country is doing, our customers pay more and the competitiveness of Wisconsin business is put at risk," she said. Environmental, fishing and hunting groups have pushed for stricter regulations because of concerns about mercury in fish. Wisconsin has a statewide fish consumption advisory telling consumers particularly children and women who may have children to limit the amount of fish they eat because of mercury contamination. The Natural Resources Board will review the new regulations on March 28. The rules also would need approval from the state Legislature, where they will likely face opposition in the Republican-controlled Assembly. Rep. Phil Montgomery, R-Ashwaubenon, chairman of the Assembly committee on energy and utilities, said he believes the proposed regulations will come before his committee. "That is the difficult task that we as legislators face, finding that balance between the environment and the technology that is out there and the ability of citizens to afford electric rates," he said. "I don't know that the DNR necessarily has that under their purview, worrying about rates." Lawniczak said no technology now exists to allow plants to achieve a 90 percent reduction. "Technology development will be the key to mercury controls," she said. Montgomery said it's another argument in favor of more nuclear power. "The technology is out there. It's called nuclear," he said. Contact us at 920-235-7700. thenorthwestern.com is a Gannett Company website. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, updated June 7, 2005. ***************************************************************** 42 [NukeNet] Israeli discovery converts dangerous radioactive waste Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:20:17 -0800 http://www.israel21c.org/bin/en.jsp?enScript=PrintVersion.jsp&enDispWho=Articles^l1586 Israeli discovery converts dangerous radioactive waste into clean energy By Karin Kloosterman March 18, 2007 The laws of conservation of energy and mass say that energy or mass cannot be created or destroyed - only change form. With the help of Russian scientists, Israeli firm Environmental Energy Resources (EER), has taken the laws of science and turned them into a useful invention for mankind - a reactor that converts radioactive, hazardous and municipal waste into inert byproducts such as glass and clean energy. The problem of radioactive waste is a global one, and getting increasingly worse. All countries in the industrialized world are waking up to the need for safer hazardous waste disposal methods. "In the beginning, nobody believed that we could do it," says Itschak Shrem, chairman of investment company Shrem, Fudim and Keiner representing EER at a press briefing announcing the innovation last week in Tel Aviv. Shrem, himself an invoker of small miracles through the founding of one of Israel's most lucrative venture capital funds - Polaris (now Pitango) - points to a chunk of black, lava-like rock sitting on the table in front of everyone's coffee cups. The journalists cautiously eye Shrem as he assures them that the shiny dark material, emitted from EER's pilot waste treatment reactor near Karmiel in the north, is safe to touch. "It also makes a good recyclable material for building and paving roads," he assures them. Earlier, Shrem told ISRAEL21c that EER can take low-radioactive, medical and municipal solid waste and produce from it clean energy that "can be used for just about anything." Using a system called plasma gasification melting technology (PGM) developed by scientists from Russia's Kurchatov Institute research center, the Radon Institute in Russia, and Israel's Technion Institute - EER combines high temperatures and low-radioactive energy to transform waste. "We go up to 7,000 degrees centigrade and end at 1,400 centigrade," says Moshe Stern, founder and president of the Ramat Gan-based company. Shrem adds that EER's waste disposal rector does not harm the environment and leaves no surface water, groundwater, or soil pollution in its wake. The EER reactor combines three processes into one solution: it takes plasma torches to break down the waste; carbon leftovers are gasified and inorganic components are converted to solid waste. The remaining vitrified material is inert and can be cast into molds to produce tiles, blocks or plates for the construction industry. EER's Karmiel facility (and its other installation in the Ukraine) has a capacity to convert 500 to 1,000 kilograms of waste per hour. Other industry solutions, the company claims, can only treat as much as 50 kilograms per hour and are much more costly. According to the journal /Research Studies/ (Business Communications, Inc.), 'The production of nuclear weapons/power in the US has left a 50-year legacy of unprecedented volumes of radioactive waste and contaminated subsurface media and structures... Nuclear waste generators include the national laboratories, industrial research facilities, educational and medical institutions, electrical power utilities, medical diagnostics facilities, and various manufacturing processes.' In the US alone, /Research Studies/ predicts that this year's market for radioactive waste-management technologies in America will cap $5.5 billion. EER was founded in 2000 and has maintained a low profile until revealing its reactor last week. "We spent our time on R&D and building up the site in Israel which we started constructing in 2003. We realized that nobody was going to believe us unless we started doing the process physically. They always said it sounded too good to be true, so we had to prove it to them," said Shrem. Back in 2004, the Ukrainian government put out a tender searching for a solution that would provide safer hazardous waste disposal methods. At that time, the country was looking for a way to treat its low-radioactive waste zones resulting from the Chernobyl explosion. EER sent in their proposal, and their technology won the bid. According to Stern, the former Soviet Union was the first to build nuclear plants. Over the years they have generated "huge amounts of low-radioactive waste. They came to us looking for a solution," he said. The Chernobyl nuclear meltdown on April 26, 1986 - was beyond a doubt the largest civil nuclear explosion in the world and one still linked to thousands of deaths. More than 20 years after the explosion, tens of kilometers around the reactor is still highly radioactive; and some 30,000 radioactive homes remain buried along with household appliances, food and clothing, explained Stern. "The European community is afraid of what is happening there," notes Stern, warning that it is time for the clean up to begin, even if it means making only a small dent in the massive pile. "The low-radioactive waste is slowly contaminating the water and will continue to do so over the 300 years it takes to break down." And since new conventions have been set by The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal, first world countries are no longer permitted to traffic their hazardous waste to third world nations - forcing Western countries to drum up immediate and responsible solutions. With a strict eye over its operations by Israel's Ministry of Environmental Protection, EER revealed its proof-of-concept to Israeli and foreign dignitaries in Aeblin, near Karmiel last week, showing how it can take mountains of municipal waste and reduce it to a pile of black rubble. "We are not burning. This is the key word," Shrem said. "When you burn you produce dioxin. Instead, we vacuum out the oxygen to prevent combustion." EER then purifies the gas and with it operates turbines to generate electricity. EER produces energy - 70% of which goes back to power the reactor with a 30% excess which can be sold. "In effect, we are combining two of the most exciting markets in the US - the environment and clean energy," says Stern, "We also reduce the carbon footprint." The cost for treating and burying low-radioactive nuclear waste currently stands at about $30,000 per ton. The EER process will cost $3,000 per ton and produce only a 1% per volume solid byproduct. In the US, EER is working to treat low-radioactive liquid waste and recently contracted with Energy Solutions, the largest American company in the field with 75% of the US market. Based on the financial forecasts, EER is certainly giving a fresh meaning to the expression - one man's garbage is another man's treasure. But in EER's case, ones man's hazardous waste may very well be EER's goldmine. 2001-2004 ISRAEL21c.org. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 43 TheStar.com: Cameco shares climb on Cigar Lake plan Mar 19, 2007 05:14 PM Canadian press SASKATOON – Cameco Corp. shares (TSX: CCO) traded higher on Monday as investors appeared to take some comfort in the company's latest plan for its flooded Cigar Lake mining project, even though the uranium mine will be two years late and cost nearly $180 million more than originally expected. Research Capital analyst Brian Mok said Cameco's announcement removes an "overhang of not knowing" and investors may take some reassurance from a target date for the mine to start – even though it will be late and over budget. "That's good that they finally put something out there, just stating exactly what their target is," Mok said in an interview. ``Whether they make that is an entirely different debate, but at least they've got a milestone out there." Cameco shares gained $1.97 or about 4.6 per cent to trade for $45.18 on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Monday. The Saskatoon-based company said it is now aiming to have its Cigar Lake project in production by 2010. The original target date was 2008. The Saskatoon-based company also said its share of the capital costs related to Cigar Lake's production startup have risen from the last estimate of $330 million to $508 million. Cameco has already spent $234 million on construction so far, with another $274 million remaining. But despite the increased capital costs, Cameco insists Cigar Lake, in northern Saskatchewan, remains a financially attractive project. "The economics of the mine remain robust under a wide range of scenarios," Cameco CEO Jerry Grandey told a conference call with analysts. Grandey said 13 of the 14 drill holes planned for reinforcing and sealing off the water inflow area are complete, while concrete is required in two locations underground – one near the rockfall to seal off where the water entered the mine and another in a nearby tunnel to provide reinforcement. In addition to the capital costs, Cameco said its share of flood remediation is estimated at $46 million and will be expensed in the year they occur. The company spent and expensed $5 million of that amount in 2006. Cameco said it will file a technical report on the mine's progress with Canadian securities regulators by the end of the month. Mok said he will be looking in that report for any hint about how the flooding might affect the operating cost of the mine as well as the details of the cost escalations in building the mine. "My hope is that they will give some indication as to how or what their previously budgeted operating costs are," he said. The flooding at Cigar Lake sent uranium prices soaring in last year. Last April, water flooded a shaft at Cigar Lake used mainly for underground ventilation. Then in October, two massive bulkheads failed to hold back water from a flood after a rock slide in a shaft about a half-kilometre underground, flooding the entire mine. In 2006, Cameco saw its fourth-quarter earnings fall by more than half that of the previous year. It earned $83 million, or 23 cents a share, in the last three months of 2005, but only brought in $40 million, or 11 cents a share, for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2006. But its 2007 outlook remains rosy. It says its revenue from its uranium business is forecast to grow by 45 per cent and its fuel services business will be 20 per cent higher than that of 2006. Copyright Toronto Star online since 1996 ***************************************************************** 44 Interfax: IAEA delegation to visit future uranium enrichment center in Angarsk Mar 19 2007 2:30PM MOSCOW. March 19 (Interfax) - A delegation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will visit the Angarsk chemical plant, the future location of the first international uranium enrichment center, on March 20, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said at a Monday meeting of government members chaired by President Vladimir Putin. "This will be the first step in fulfillment of the presidential initiative for a global network of international uranium enrichment centers," he said. This initiative "will give all countries wishing to develop the atomic energy industry access to high-tech service," Ivanov said, adding, "They will provide access to the service, not the uranium enrichment technology." 1991-2007 Interfax All rights reserved News and other data on this web site are provided for information purposes only, and are not intended for republication or redistribution. Republication or redistribution of Interfax content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Interfax. ***************************************************************** 45 Salt Lake Tribune: Capping waste: Gov. Huntsman cut a deal that limits volume Tribune Editorial Article Last Updated: 03/18/2007 11:13:39 PM MDT Chalk one up for the governor. By cutting a deal with EnergySolutions, it appears that he has capped the amount of low-level nuclear waste that the company can accept at its site in Tooele County under its current license. The company had asked state regulators for permission to pile this waste higher (up to eight stories high) in one of its cells at its dump in Clive. Had that application been granted, the company would have gained an additional capacity of 4.3 million cubic yards of Class A low-level nuclear waste. Under the agreement, EnergySolutions will withdraw that application. And what did EnergySolutions gain? It has some 3.6 million cubic yards of unused capacity in another cell that receives a different class of low-level nuclear wastes that are generated by government. The company will ask for regulatory approval to convert this unused capacity to Class A low-level waste that could come either from the government or from commercial sources. Since the unused capacity had been previously approved, the net total volume of waste that goes to the site would not change. Gov. Jon Huntsman also announced that Utah will not accept any additional Class A low-level nuclear waste beyond the volume that has already been approved. That's the first time a Utah chief executive has said that. So, while it will take years for the site to fill, meaning that this waste will continue to come to Utah for disposal, the total capacity of the facility will not increase, at least under this governor. When it's full, that's it. No more. An end is in sight. As part of the agreement, EnergySolutions also reaffirmed that it will not accept Class B or Class C wastes, which have higher radionuclide concentrations than Class A waste. We have criticized the governor for failing to veto SB155, which takes him and his successors, the Legislature and local governments out of the regulatory loop for EnergySolutions' applications to renew or amend its license unless the company seeks to expand beyond its current facility boundaries. We still have concerns about that. But we give the governor and his administration credit for cutting a deal that appears to cap disposal volume at the site. It appears that [Huntsman] has capped the amount of low-level nuclear waste that the company can accept. Privacy Policy | MNG Corporate Site Map | Copyright ***************************************************************** 46 IHT: Russia's international uranium enrichment center to begin work soon, deputy premier says - International Herald Tribune The Associated Press Published: March 19, 2007 MOSCOW: Russia plans to put its international uranium enrichment center into operation soon, First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Monday, according to Russian news agencies. The center, at Angarsk in Siberia, is to enrich uranium that would be used for civilian purposes by other countries that have made nonproliferation commitments; the center also would reprocess used uranium to ensure it is not converted into material that could be used for nuclear weapons. President Vladimir Putin proposed setting up the center last year, and he and U.S. President George W. Bush adopted a joint initiative on creating such centers. Ivanov said inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency would visit the center on Tuesday. Copyright 2007 the International Herald Tribune All rights reserved ***************************************************************** 47 UPI: Russia: Nuclear fuel centers a priority United Press International - Energy - 3/19/2007 1:54:00 PM -0400 MOSCOW, March 19 (UPI) -- A top Russian official said international uranium enrichment facilities are a key priority to ensure access to fuel for nuclear power plants. Russia has already created a uranium enrichment center in Angarsk, in cooperation with Kazakstan, while Moscow and Washington are discussing future cooperation on such facilities. "The essence of the functioning of such a center is that the broadest possibilities will be provided to our partners for participating in its work, but the uranium enrichment technology belongs to us and only to us," Russian First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said, Itar-Tass reports. Enriching uranium is a process to make fuel for nuclear reactors, but can also lead to weapons grade uranium. The United States and Russia have begun formulating plans to set up regimes that would create an adequate supply of uranium for countries needing the fuel, as well as a mechanism to retrieve the used fuel, since it too is a proliferation risk. "For the first time in the Soviet and Russian practice, an enrichment plant has been taken off the list of especially secret facilities and opened for the application of (International Atomic Energy Agency) guarantees," Ivanov said, referring to Angarsk. Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights ***************************************************************** 48 Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation: Deadline for nuclear waste comments News for Monday, March 19th, 2007 Written by Ken Hashizume People who want to speak about the Western Waste Management Facility in Tiverton must submit their request soon. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission will hear from the public April 11th on a 10-year license renewal of the WWMF. Kincardine Mayor Larry Kraemer will be making a presentation in support of the Ontario Power Generation at the hearings. OPG Spokesperson Marie Wilson says the Mayor's actions show there is a lot of faith and trust in their operations. She says it also shows the knowledge Kraemer and other people have of how their business runs. Wilson says the renewal will include a request for authorization of the construction of at least one low-level storage building, 128 in-ground containers for low-intermediate level waste, and 8 refurbished waste buildings. She says, however, that does not mean OPG will go ahead and do these things, they just want approval to do so when the time comes. Wilson says the public has until today to inform the CNSC of their intentions. She says the public can make their submissions either in writing or in person or both. This site is part of the Bayshore Broadcasting family of radio stations Mix 106 | 560 CFOS | Country 93 | 98 the Beach | Bayshore Broadcasting 2006 Bayshore Broadcasting Corp. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 49 DOE: DOE Issues Solicitation for Purchase of Oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve March 16, 2007 WASHINGTON, DC - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will seek solicitations to purchase up to four million barrels of crude oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). This is the first of a series of solicitations planned to replace 11 million barrels of oil sold in the fall of 2005 after Hurricane Katrina disrupted refinery supplies. This would be the first direct purchase of crude oil for the reserve since 1994. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve will use the proceeds from the emergency sale totaling $584 million to complete the purchases. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is a critical national asset that bolsters our energy security, Secretary Bodman said. "By replenishing the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, we can ensure that there are additional supplies of fuel for the American people in cases of severe supply disruption." The Strategic Petroleum Reserve has a capacity of 727 million barrels, and currently holds 689 million barrels in inventory. The solicitations over the next several months will be staggered so that no single purchase will adversely impact the market price. Bids will be accepted based on fair market value and combinations of sweet and sour crude will be purchased based on price. At this time, the Department will review proposals in the following quantities: two million barrels of sweet crude to be delivered to the West Hackberry, Louisiana site, and/or two million barrels of sour crude to the delivered to the Bryan Mound, Texas site. Bids are due by April 3, 2007, and contract awards will be made within one week. The delivery period for the crude oil is May 1-31, 2007. Through the terms of contracts to be issued from the planned series of solicitations, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve seeks to achieve a moderate fill rate of approximately 100,000 barrels per day during the months of May, June and July. Media contact(s): Craig Stevens, (202) 586-4940 U.S. Department of Energy | 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585 1-800-dial-DOE | f/202-586-4403 ***************************************************************** 50 Santa Fe Nw Mexican: Trinity Site opening to public April 7 Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:30 pm By ASSOCIATED PRESS March 19, 2007 WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE, N.M. (AP) - The southern New Mexico site where the world's first atomic bomb was tested will open to the public on April 7. Trinity Site, on the normally closed White Sands Missile Range, features a small lava obelisk that marks Ground Zero. Historical photographs are mounted on a fence around the site. The missile range also offers a shuttle from Trinity Site to a ranch house two miles away where scientists assembled the plutonium core of the bomb, which was set off early the morning of July 16, 1945. The test was the culmination of the secret Manhattan Project at Los Alamos, some 200 miles north. Scientists had developed two bomb designs _ one using uranium and the other plutonium. The plutonium design was complex, and scientists decided a test was essential. After scientists assembled the bomb at the ranch house, it was taken to Trinity Site and hoisted onto a 100-foot tower that was vaporized during the explosion. The blast produced a flash of light that could be seen 250 miles away, a roar heard 50 miles away and a mushroom cloud that rose 40,000 feet. Less than a month later, on Aug. 6, 1945, the United States exploded the uranium-based "Little Boy" bomb over Hiroshima. Three days later, it dropped the plutonium-based "Fat Man" on Nagasaki. Japan surrendered on Aug. 14, ending World War II. All adults on the Trinity Site tour must show a photo ID and should also carry proof of insurance and current registration of their vehicle. All vehicles entering the missile range are subject to search. From the north, visitors can enter the missile range through Stallion gate, five miles south of U.S. 380, some 12 miles east of San Antonio, N.M. The gate will be open from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., and the 17-mile road to the site is paved and marked. A caravan from Alamogordo also goes on the tour. It will form at the parking lot for Tularosa High School's football field and leave at 8 a.m. for the 75-mile drive to Trinity Site. Once it enters the range, military police escort the caravan. It will leave for the return trip between 12:30 p.m. and 1 p.m. ___ On the Net: White Sands Missile Range Trinity Site: http://www.wsmr.army.mil/pao/TrinitySite/trinph.htm 2007, Santa Fe New Mexican, all rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 51 Tri-City Herald: Fluor may use divers to clean K Basin sludge Published Monday, March 19th, 2007 ANNETTE CARY HERALD STAFF WRITER Fluor Hanford again is considering sending divers into Hanford's radioactive K Basins to help with cleanup. The Department of Energy contractor considered using divers experienced in the nuclear industry two years ago. But it found ways to vacuum the bulk of the radioactive sludge into containers in the K East Basin without them. But as Fluor prepares for the final cleanup steps at K East, it has asked for and received proposals for a diving service with preference given to a company that has done dives at a Department of Energy facility. Fluor is considering three proposals and could select one based on technical expertise, but no decision to go forward with dives has been made, said Fluor Hanford spokesman Geoff Tyree. At K East, workers standing on grates above the pools have removed most of the debris in the pools and vacuumed most of the sludge into containers using underwater cameras and long-handled tools to reach the bottom of the 20-foot-deep pool. What remains is detail work, such as removing some smaller debris and vacuuming areas difficult to reach from above water, Tyree said. The K East and K West basins were used to hold irradiated fuel underwater until it was processed to remove plutonium for the nation's weapons program. When fuel processing stopped at the Hanford nuclear reservation, 2,300 pounds of fuel was left stranded in the basins. The last of the fuel was removed in 2004. But left behind was about 70 cubic yards of radioactive sludge from fuel that had decayed over decades in the water, desert dust and concrete that sloughed off the sides of the pools. Fluor has moved the bulk of the sludge in the leak-prone K East Basin into underwater containers and is transferring it the K West Basin to await treatment. Fluor also is working to vacuum K West sludge into containers. Divers might be used at one basin or both, Tyree said. The Fluor request for proposals discusses placing platforms above the floor of the basin for divers to work on. That could help limit the exposure to radiation from the sludge and contamination embedded on the floor and prevent divers' boots from coming into contaminated materials, Tyree said. Divers would place debris in underwater sorting baskets or waste containers and in some cases might have to cut up the debris to make it smaller. Divers also could help with rigging to lift boxes, baskets or equipment out of the water and do some vacuuming. As work proceeds to clean up and remove the floors and walls of the concrete basins, divers might help with further work to remove embedded contamination, water and add grout. No schedule has been set for the possible dives, but a Defense Nuclear Safety Board report said it would not start sooner than May. "As with any new work, Fluor will ensure that safety and technical questions are addressed prior to doing work," Tyree said. Diving is not new to the nuclear industry. The Idaho National Laboratory has used divers to clean out four spent nuclear fuel storage basins. Commercial nuclear power plants also have used divers. © 2007 Tri-City Herald, Associated Press & Other Wire Services ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************