***************************************************************** 10/26/06 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 14.254 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 EU backs limited nuclear sanctions against Iran 2 Guardian Unlimited: Russia opposes draft UN resolution on Iran 3 washingtonpost.com: U.S., European Allies at Odds on Terms of Iran R 4 AFP: China, France united on Iran, NKorea nukes - 5 AFP: British envoy plays down US-European differences over Iran sanc 6 AFP: Russia rejects Europe's UN draft resolution on Iran 7 Guardian Unlimited: Tehran Radio Warns of Nuclear Impasse 8 AFP: US sensitive to Moscow concerns over Iran sanctions 9 UPI: U.N. draft on Iran punitive, minister says 10 Guardian Unlimited: Russia Opposes Draft Resolution on Iran 11 UN Nuclear Watchdog Chief Calls For Talks With Dpr Korea, Iran 12 UN Nuclear Chief Meets With Us Secretary Rice; Calls For Talks With 13 Guardian Unlimited: South Korea Enforces Sanctions on North 14 Korea Herald: New estimate of N.K. WMDs 15 Korea Herald: U.S. to explain nuke umbrella 16 Korea Herald: U.S. to impose 'India-Pakistan sanctions' on N.K. 17 Korea Herald: [NEWS FOCUS]Seoul caving in to pressure over PSI 18 Korea Herald: [EDITORIAL]Sweeping reshuffle 19 Korea Herald: Seoul to bar N.K. arms officials 20 Korea Herald: Russia advocates cautious response to N.K. 21 Korea Herald: Seoul to deny entry to N. Koreans 22 INSIDE JoongAng Daily: Politicians held for contacting North's agent 23 INSIDE JoongAng Daily: Seoul bars some visits from across the DMZ 24 Korea Times: North Korea Has 50 Kg of Plutonium 25 Korea Times: Effectiveness of UN Panel on N. Korea Questioned 26 Korea Times: USFK Chief to Meet Journalists 27 Korea Times: [Michael Breen] Ethics of Sunshine 28 AFP: Six-party talks only route for US dialogue with North Korea - H 29 AFP: SKorea makes first move to enforce UN sanctions on North - 30 UPI: South Korea updates North's bomb estimate 31 Guardian Unlimited: Tokyo Denies Report It Wants Nuke Meet | 32 Guardian Unlimited: S. Korea: North Can Make 7 Nuclear Bombs 33 RIA Novosti: Ex-nuclear head will not ask court for dismissal of his 34 AFP: Billion-dollar contracts signed as French, Chinese leaders meet 35 Xinhua: China, France ink joint statement, 14 cooperation agreements 36 UPI: Analysis: Israel assesses NATO ties 37 UPI: Walker's World: Chirac's Chinese detour NUCLEAR REACTORS 38 Guardian Unlimited: Time running out fast for oldest nuclear plants, 39 Times of India: The world has failed on N-tech transfer - Rahul 40 Telugu Portal: India seeks review of nuclear energy policies - 41 US: NRC: Nuclear Management Company, LLC; Palisades Plant Exemption 42 Boston Globe: U.S. tries to reassure India over nuclear deal - 43 Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation: Bruce B plans being reviewed 44 US: GRACE Energy Initiative: Is Nuclear Power the Solution to Climat 45 US: Public Citizen: Public Citizen Defends Environmental Nonprofit NUCLEAR SECURITY 46 US: NRC: NRC Approves Final Rule on National Source Tracking System 47 US: NRC: NRC Seeks Public Comment on Revisions and Additions to Phys 48 UPI: NNSA upgrades Russian navy nuke security NUCLEAR SAFETY 49 News & Star: Evacuation after nuclear train breaks down at station NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 50 US: Gallup Independent: Waste to be moved through Gallup 51 US: Deseret News: Goshute leader backs N-storage 52 US: RIA Novosti: Russian-Kazakh JV to mine first ton of uranium in e 53 US: Salt Lake Tribune: Skull Valley: Former leader out as Goshutes e 54 US: ITAR-TASS: Russian-Kazakh uranium enrichment JV in Angarsk to be 55 FOE Scotland: NUCLEAR WASTE - BRIBERY NO SOLUTION TO DEADLY LEGACY 56 US: Mos News: Russian-Kazakh Uranium Enrichment Center to Start Work PEACE US DEPT. OF ENERGY 57 DOE: DOE Announces Over $8 Million to Increase Use and 58 Tri-City Herald: Worker complaints draw changes 59 Tri-City Herald: Ex-official Grumbly speaks on vit, DOE 60 washingtonpost.com: Security Officials Sent to Los Alamos - 61 DenverPost.com: Tepee finds new home in Cold War museum 62 Federal Times: Another possible data security breach at Los Alamos 63 lamonitor.com: Police discover suspected classified data 64 lamonitor.com: Big magnet ready for new tests at LANL 65 AFP: FBI investigating possible security breach at Los Alamos lab - 66 UPI: U.S. nuclear secrets feared on stolen disk 67 Guardian Unlimited: Security Officials Sent to Los Alamos ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 EU backs limited nuclear sanctions against Iran Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:55:40 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender-Host-Name: chumbly.math.missouri.edu X-DSPAM-Result: mail; result="Innocent"; class="Whitelisted"; probability=0.0000; confidence=1.00; signature=N/A X-Spam-Class: HAM Reuters.com EU backs limited nuclear sanctions against Iran http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2006-10-17T150642Z_01_L17764198_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-EU.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C1-topNews-4 Tue Oct 17, 2006 By Paul Taylor LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - The European Union, spurred by North Korea's nuclear test, backed limited United Nations sanctions against Iran's nuclear program on Tuesday after Tehran spurned conditions for opening negotiations. The EU's 25 foreign ministers, meeting in Luxembourg, called for incremental measures targeted first at individuals and materials involved in Iranian uranium enrichment activities, which the West suspects is aimed at making a bomb. After four months of talks with EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, Iran this month rejected a U.N. demand that it suspend enrichment. "The Iranians' refusal leaves us no choice today but to take to the Security Council route. The Security Council should adopt gradual, reversible measures proportionate to Iranian actions," French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy told reporters. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier called it the "first step in sanctions" but stressed the EU's offer of cooperation remained on the table if Iran was willing to meet the conditions. Ministers made clear that alarm at North Korea's nuclear test and its implications for other countries were one key factor in showing their resolve toward Iran, although their economic interests with Tehran are far greater. "The most important thing is to have a united response as we showed with North Korea. We must show Iran that the international community is completely determined to remain united," European External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner said. "We offered a very attractive package which could be beneficial for Iran, but up to now we have not received an acceptance," she told reporters. Spanish Secretary of State for European Affairs Alberto Navarro said sanctions would be gradual because Europe, unlike the United States, needed Iran as an oil supplier. DOOR OPEN Mark Fitzpatrick of the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies said the approach with Tehran would be gentler than with Pyongyang. "A sanctions resolution on Iran will not be swift or biting as it has been with North Korea," he said, noting that while Pyongyang openly affirmed its nuclear weapons intentions, Tehran insisted its program was peaceful. There was no conclusive proof it sought an atom bomb, he said. Solana, who negotiated with Iranian national security chief Ali Larijani in a vain effort to persuade Tehran to suspend its most sensitive nuclear work, said the door would remain open. "I think there is always hope, and I would like it to be possible to start again, but it is up to Iran now to accept the conditions to start real negotiations," he said. In a statement, the ministers expressed deep concern that Iran had not yet suspended enrichment activities and said the EU has no choice but to support consultations in the United Nations on measures on the basis of resolution 1696, which told Iran to suspend enrichment by August 31 or face sanctions. The six major powers that backed the incentives package that Solana put to Iran -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany -- are to start consultations at the United Nations on Wednesday on a sanctions resolution, diplomats said. Moscow and Beijing have so far been reticent about any sanctions, but a European diplomat said they had accepted the principle of an incremental approach raising pressure. In Vienna, a senior diplomat familiar with International Atomic Energy Agency monitoring in Iran said Iranian efforts to develop its enrichment program beyond the initial test phase appeared slow. Iran had planned to have a second cascade of 164 centrifuge enrichment machines running by end-September but this had not happened, he said, while the first cascade was only being sporadically fed with uranium UF-6 gas for enrichment into fuel. Analysts have estimated Iran will need 3-10 years to produce enough fuel for bombs. (Additional reporting by Ingrid Melander and Carsten Lietz in Luxembourg and Mark Heinrich in Vienna) ) Reuters 2006. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 2 Guardian Unlimited: Russia opposes draft UN resolution on Iran Mark Tran Thursday October 26, 2006 Guardian Unlimited International attempts to forge a united front in the nuclear standoff with Iran today suffered a setback as Russia declared its opposition to current UN proposals. Sergei Lavrov, the Russia foreign minister, said a draft UN resolution imposing limited sanctions against Tehran did not match existing agreements between major powers. "Our goal is to eliminate the risks of sensitive technologies getting into the hands of Iran until the IAEA [the International Atomic Energy Agency] clarifies issues of interest to it, while maintaining all possible channels of communication with Iran," Russian news agencies quoted Mr Lavrov as saying. "It seems to me that, in this context, the draft resolution clearly does not correspond to those tasks agreed on by the six sides." The draft resolution - drawn up by Britain, France and Germany - has also run into opposition from the US, with Washington considering it not to be tough enough. The major powers have been working for weeks to come up with a response to Iran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment despite a package of incentives offered in the summer. Iran says its nuclear programme is designed to meet growing energy needs, not to produce nuclear weapons. However, the US is convinced Tehran is determined to make a nuclear bomb. Britain, France and Germany yesterday presented Russia and China with the text of a resolution that requires states to "prevent the supply, sale or transfer" of Iran's nuclear and ballistic programmes. The New York Times reported that the resolution includes barring Iranian students from studying nuclear physics at foreign universities and a ban on visas for any Iranians involved in nuclear activities. However, the sticking point is Russia's construction of Iran's first nuclear power plant at Bushehr, in the south-west of the country. Russia, which has rejected US demands to halt work on the plant, last month agreed to supply fuel for it in March next year, enabling it to go online in September 2007. The Russian deputy foreign minister, Sergei Kislyak, said the project to build the power plant was one of several obstacles holding up agreement on the UN resolution. "Lengthy negotiations will be needed to find a mutually acceptable solution," the Russian Interfax news agency quoted him as saying. UN ambassadors from the five permanent members of the security council and Germany are scheduled to hold further discussions on the resolution today. Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, yesterday again urged the UN to adopt sanctions against Iran's nuclear programme. "For the international community to be credible, it must pass a resolution now that holds Iran accountable for its defiance," Dr Rice told the Heritage Foundation, a rightwing thinktank. [UP] Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 3 washingtonpost.com: U.S., European Allies at Odds on Terms of Iran Resolution - By Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, October 26, 2006; Page A20 UNITED NATIONS, Oct. 25 -- The United States and its European allies split Wednesday over the terms of a U.N. resolution calling for a ban on Iranian trade in ballistic missiles and nuclear materials, according to Security Council diplomats. The Bush administration supports the Europeans' broad aims of sanctioning Tehran for refusing to halt nuclear activities. But the White House declined to endorse a European-backed draft resolution, fearing it would be too weak to constrain from developing nuclear weapons, U.S. and European diplomats said. Nuclear Development in Iran On Wednesday, , and presented and with the text of a resolution that requires states to "prevent the supply, sale or transfer" of Iran's nuclear and ballistic programs and would halt Tehran's ability to secure financing and technical assistance for them. The resolution would also ban travel and freeze the assets of individuals associated with the weapons programs, said a council diplomat who has seen the draft. But it exempts Russia from the trade embargo, allowing it to continue a previously approved nuclear energy agreement to support the construction of Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant. The Europeans rejected a series of U.S. amendments that would have imposed greater restrictions on Russia's nuclear trade with Iran and that characterized Iran's nuclear activities as a threat to international peace and security. They said the U.S. proposals may have provoked a Russian veto. The Europeans also have far stronger trade relations with Iran than does the United States and have been reluctant to approve tougher sanctions. European negotiators, however, did agree to include a proposal by U.S. Ambassador John R. Bolton to invoke a provision known as Article 41, which obliges states to enforce U.N. sanctions. They have given China and Russia two days to respond to the resolution before presenting it to all 15 members of the Security Council. "We're going to be meeting with the Russians and the Chinese tomorrow to get their reaction," Bolton said. "The Europeans gave them two days in both Moscow and Beijing, which we hope will be sufficient time so that we can make progress rapidly." European negotiators thought they had secured U.S. backing for the proposal to exempt Russia from the trade ban at a meeting of political directors in late September. But the deal failed to secure the full backing of the Bush administration because of concerns that Iran could use the Bushehr exemption as a cover for importing other prohibited goods. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this week backed a proposal by Bolton to present the Europeans with tougher language. When the Europeans refused, Bolton said the United States would not co-sponsor their resolution. Iran says its nuclear energy program is designed to meet the country's growing energy needs, not to produce nuclear weapons. The United States alleges the effort is a front for a weapons program. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, maintains that it has not found proof that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. But it charges that Iran's efforts to develop its nuclear program in secrecy over the past 18 years have helped fueled international suspicions. The United Nations and key European governments have been pressing Tehran, without success, for about three years to provide the world with verifiable assurances that its program is peaceful. In August, the Security Council threatened to consider sanctions against Iran if it did not suspend its enrichment of uranium and consider a package of U.S.-backed European incentives. Iran maintains that it prepared to hold talks with the council's five major powers -- the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain -- as well as Germany over the fate of its nuclear program. But it has refused to first halt its nuclear activities, insisting that it has the authority, under the 1970 Non-Proliferation Treaty, to develop nuclear energy. Earlier this week, the head of the U.N. atomic energy agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, told The Washington Post that Iran continues to advance its nuclear enrichment activities, and that Iranian technicians are on the verge of using a new cascade of 164 centrifuges to enrich uranium. Kessler reported from Washington. The Washington Post Company: ***************************************************************** 4 AFP: China, France united on Iran, NKorea nukes - [Visiting French President Jacques Chirac (L) with Chinese President Hu Jintao in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing] BEIJING (AFP) - United Nations Security Council members China and France have presented a united front against the separate nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran. A joint communique released by Chinese President Hu Jintao and visiting French President Jacques Chirac expressed "grave concern" over North Korea's October 9 atomic bomb test and called on Iran to heed UN mandates over its nuclear program. It called the North Korean test "contrary to the goal of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and the efforts of the international community to strengthen the non-proliferation regime." North Korea caused a global uproar with the test blast, triggering a UN Security Council resolution imposing economic sanctions aimed at curbing the reclusive state's weapons program. The two leaders also called on Tehran to finally abide by a Security Council resolution that had set an August 31 deadline for Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons development plans or face sanctions. Iran has ignored the deadline. "The two sides call for respect of Security Council resolution 1696 and agree to pursue their joint efforts for a resolution of the nuclear issue to maintain a close permanent contact on this matter," the statement said. The Security Council's five permanent members -- China, France, Russia, Britain and the United States -- were expected on Thursday to begin discussing a new draft resolution that spells out possible Iran sanctions. The draft urges UN member states to take steps to prevent Iran from transferring any materials or knowledge related to those programs to other parties and to deny Tehran any financial, technical or other assistance that could aid them. The draft warns that the council would "consider further measures" if Iran still refuses to comply with a demand that it freeze uranium enrichment, which can provide the raw material for nuclear weapons. The support of China -- which has historically strong links to its North Korean neighbor and extensive energy interests in Iran -- is seen as crucial in achieving UN objectives on both issues. However, it has so far shown an unwillingness to push Iran and North Korea too hard. Chirac is on a four-day visit to China ending on Saturday. AFP ***************************************************************** 5 AFP: British envoy plays down US-European differences over Iran sanctions draft - Thu Oct 26, 3:43 PM ET UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - Britain's UN envoy Emyr Jones Parry played down differences between the United States and its European allies on a draft resolution mandating sanctions against Iran" /> over its refusal to halt sensitive nuclear fuel work. Envoys from France, Britain and Germany earlier this week presented their Russian and colleagues with a draft resolution that calls on UN member states to slap nuclear and ballistic missile related sanctions on Iran. The text also provides for a freeze on assets related to Iran's nuclear and missile programs as well as travel bans on nuclear and weapons scientists involved in those programs. The text was worked out in consultations with the United States, which according to some diplomats had pressed for a tougher text, including a call for an end to Moscow's assistance to Iran's Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power station. But in an apparent bid to mollify Moscow, the text drawn up by the three European powers specifically stresses that the Bushehr project shall be exempted from the proposed sanctions. "The Americans and we are on board and we are very close to each other," Jones Parry said. "I wouldn't blow up the differences. We didn't screw down the final details but the essence of the resolution has been worked out and we are in close harmony." He added that "it will take quite a while" to reach a consensus on the draft among the council's 15 members "because it is a hard, technical resolution to do. The politics of it are intense and it's part of a strategy toward a country which is very important." Envoys of the Security Council's five veto-wielding permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany were to meet later Thursday at the British UN mission in New York to review the draft. "I don't think we'll touch on specifics," said China's UN delegate Li Junhua, who urged patience. "Since the door to diplomatic efforts is still open why should we rush to sanctions," he said, noting that "sanctions in our own assessment won't help." China and Russia, which have significant economic interests in Iran, are reluctant to slap tough measures on Tehran, and a Western diplomat said that Moscow was certain to oppose any call to suspend its aid to Bushehr. Last month, Russia and Iran officially agreed on a 12-month deadline for completing the controversial Bushehr project, despite earlier pressure from Tehran that the station be completed in half that time. Delays have plagued the project ever since the two countries entered into an initial agreement in 1995, with US officials pressing Russia to suspend the program. The Bushehr contract is worth about one billion dollars to Russia. Western powers suspect Iran is covertly trying to build nuclear weapons. But Tehran has repeatedly ignored UN Security Council demands that it halt uranium enrichment, a process which, if extended, can provide the raw material for a nuclear warhead. It insists that its nuclear program is peaceful and solely geared toward generating electricity. Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 6 AFP: Russia rejects Europe's UN draft resolution on Iran by Sebastian Smith Thu Oct 26, 11:47 AM ET MOSCOW (AFP) - Russia has rejected a draft UN resolution put forward by European powers targeting Iran" /> Iran's nuclear programme, saying the proposed measures did not advance objectives agreed on earlier by major world powers. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the resolution put forward Wednesday by Britain, France and Germany would not be effective in containing Iran's programme and contradicted the consensus reached by the five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany. "I think that in this respect the draft resolution that has been presented clearly does not further the objectives that the six powers agreed on earlier," Lavrov was quoted as saying by Interfax news agency Thursday. Those goals, Lavrov said, included preventing proliferation of "sensitive technology" while also keeping open "all necessary channels of communication with Iran." One of Lavrov's top deputies, Sergei Kislyak, said separately that Russia was "carefully studying" the draft resolution. However, a "long negotiating process is required" to find a mutually acceptable decision. Lavrov later stated that Russia was ready to discuss ways of preventing deliveries of "sensitive technologies connected to uranium enrichment and processing of spent fuel," in comments quoted by RIA Novosti. Russia has long resisted the West's push for tough sanctions, partly due to a lucrative contract to construct Iran's first nuclear power station at Bushehr. The draft resolution, which proposes "necessary measures" to prevent nuclear and missile technology from reaching Iran, does not directly mention Bushehr. The United States has called on Russia to halt nuclear cooperation with Iran, but France's UN ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, said the Europeans favoured exempting the Bushehr project. Kislyak told Interfax: "There are much bigger problems there than the construction of the Bushehr station." In comments released Saturday, Lavrov repeated Russia's insistence that Iran respect international demands on its nuclear programme, but added: "We cannot support, and will actively oppose, any attempt to use the Security Council to punish Iran or to use Iran's nuclear programme in order to promote the idea of regime change." De la Sabliere, who played a key role in drafting the proposed sanctions, said they invoked Article 41 of Chapter Seven of the UN Charter which calls for sanctions not involving the use of force. The draft warns that the Security Council would "consider further measures" if Iran still refused to comply with a demand that it freeze uranium enrichment, a process used to produce fuel for nuclear reactors but which, if extended, can also provide the raw material for bombs. De La Sabliere told reporters that the text also contained a freeze on assets related to Iran's nuclear and missile programs as well as travel bans on nuclear and weapons scientists. He said the draft would be discussed Thursday among envoys of the council's five veto-wielding members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany. He added that the punitive measures were needed to respond to Tehran's defiance after the failure of negotiations between the European Union" /> European Unionand Iran. Russia's stance against the draft resolution was played down Thursday by a French foreign ministry spokesman, Jean-Baptiste Mattei, who said it was not surprising at this stage. "We are in a normal process of elaborating a UN resolution with the aim of reaching an agreement and ensuring the unity of the international community," Mattei said. "Everyone announces their positions... We have noted the Russian declarations," he said. Russia has long been closely involved in Iran and in addition to building the Bushehr power station supplies hi-tech conventional weapons to Tehran. Repeated delays in completing the Bushehr power station have prompted speculation that Moscow is quietly heeding Washington's warnings. On Wednesday Sergei Shmatko, the head of the Russian company that is heading the project, Atomstroiexport, announced further delays, insisting that the reasons were technical in nature. Meanwhile in Beijing, French President Jacques Chirac" /> President Jacques Chiracand Chinese President Hu Jintao" /> Hu Jintaopresented a united front, issuing a joint communique on the separate nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea" /> North Korea. The communique called on Tehran to finally abide by a Security Council resolution that had set an August 31 deadline for Iran to abandon its uranium enrichment program or face sanctions. "The two sides call for respect of Security Council resolution 1696 and agree to pursue their joint efforts for a resolution of the nuclear issue to maintain a close permanent contact on this matter," the statement said. Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 7 Guardian Unlimited: Tehran Radio Warns of Nuclear Impasse From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 8:01 PM AP Photo XHS107 By NASSER KARIMI Associated Press Writer TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Russia signaled opposition Thursday to a European-proposed U.N. draft resolution to impose sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, and Tehran's state-run radio warned Europe an impasse was looming. Hours before the Security Council's five permanent members, plus Germany, were to meet for the first time to discuss the European draft, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov suggested passage of the measure would require a fight. He said the resolution, which imposes limited sanctions on Iran because of its refusal to cease uranium enrichment, was a departure from existing agreements between major powers. The six major powers of United States, Russia, Germany, France, Britain and China have offered Iran incentives to halt uranium enrichment, but Tehran has rejected them. Enrichment can produce material for nuclear power reactors or weapons. Russia and China - veto-wielding Security Council members with strong commercial ties to Tehran - have agreed in principle to sanctions, but refused to close the door on the possibility of last-minute talks with Iran aimed at re-establishing cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, a U.N. watchdog. ``Our goal is to eliminate the risks of sensitive technologies getting into the hands of Iran until the IAEA clarifies issues of interest to it, while maintaining all possible channels of communication with Iran,'' Lavrov said on state television. ``And it seems to me that, in this context, the draft resolution clearly does not correspond to those tasks agreed on by the six sides,'' he said. Meanwhile, a commentary on Iran's state-run radio, which often reflects the government's perspective, warned Europe that an impasse was brewing. The Iranian radio commentary said Russia wanted to give the EU more time to entice Iran into cooperating with the IAEA. ``If Russia opposes the resolution, then Europe's stance in further negotiation with Iran would be in a worse situation,'' the commentary said. The Iranian radio commentary also accused the U.S. of impeding the EU-Iran talks. European nations this week proposed sanctions - banning the sale of missile and atomic technology to Iran and ending most U.N. help for its nuclear programs - after weeks of exploratory talks with a European Union negotiator ended without progress. The EU had proposed that Iran at least temporarily freeze enrichment as a condition for multilateral talks aimed at erasing suspicions it may be trying to build nuclear arms in violation of its treaty commitments. Tehran refused, saying its uranium enrichment program aims only to generate electricity. The United States and others suspect it is a cover for building atomic weapons. Thursday also brought a sign of cooperation between the European sponsors of the current draft resolution and China, thought to have a similar stance on sanctions as Russia. French President Jacques Chirac and Chinese President Hu Jintao issued a joint statement Thursday pledging to ``keep in close and regular contact and work to find a peaceful solution of the Iran nuclear issue,'' though they didn't mention any new initiatives. The U.S. indicated Wednesday that it saw the European draft as too weak but stopped short of discarding it. A key concern for Moscow is the future of its $1 billion contract to build Iran's first nuclear power station in the southwestern Iranian city of Bushehr. Sanctions, as laid out in the European draft resolution, would impose certain limits on the Bushehr project but would not force an end to it. Russia has steadfastly rejected U.S. demands to halt work at the site, which is due to go online in September. In Washington, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said Bushehr would not be an obstacle. ``We believe this is something we can work with,'' he said Thursday without providing any details. ``We don't think it is going to be an obstacle.'' McCormack said he expected discussions among the permanent members of the Council would go on for several days and then other governments would join in and consult with their capitals. ``We know Russia has concerns about putting too much pressure on Iran,'' he added. French Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei echoed McCormack's comments. ``We have taken note of the Russian declarations. ... We will now pursue discussions in New York,'' he said in Paris. --- Associated Press Writer Henry Meyer in Moscow contributed to this report. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 8 AFP: US sensitive to Moscow concerns over Iran sanctions Thu Oct 26, 5:20 PM ET WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States said it understands Russia's worries about proposed UN Security Council sanctions against Iran" /> Iranfor its nuclear program after Moscow said it rejected the draft. "We know that the Russians have some concerns about the tactics and concerns about applying too much pressure too quickly on the Iranians. We certainly understand their point of view," said State Department spokesman Sean McCormack. "There's certain logic that goes along with that. They have clearly expressed that to us as well as others," McCormack said. "We expect that there are probably going to be changes along the way. That is just the nature of multilateral negotiations on these UN Security Council resolutions," he added. "But the fact of the matter is, the Russian government, along with the other members of the P5-plus-1 have agreed to this diplomatic way forward, this process that we see unfolding right now," he said, referring to the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany. "The whole idea and logic of this strategy has been that we gradually increase the diplomatic pressure on Iran, over a period of time, while maintaining the unity of this core group, the P-5-plus-1," McCormack added. Earlier Thursday Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia rejects the draft put to the Security Council by France, Britain and Germany, and supported by Washington, that would penalize Tehran for refusing UN demands that it halt its uranium enrichment program, which is believed targeted at developing nuclear weapons. The draft calls on UN member states to "take necessary measures to prevent the supply, sale or transfer directly or indirectly from their territories or by their nationals ... of all items, materials, equipment, goods and technology which could contribute to Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs." Lavrov said the resolution would not be effective in containing Iran's programme and contradicted the consensus reached by the five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany, even though the draft specifically exempts from sanctions the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear plant in Iran. Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 9 UPI: U.N. draft on Iran punitive, minister says United Press International - NewsTrack - 10/26/2006 1:16:00 PM -0400 MOSCOW, Oct. 26 (UPI) -- The Russian foreign minister said a proposed U.N. draft on Iran doesn't meet objectives outlined by the six countries mediating the Iranian nuclear program. The resolution by Britain, France and Germany proposed sanctions against Iran, including banning sales of missile and nuclear technologies, freezing military bank accounts and restricting visas for nuclear industry officials, the Novosti news agency said Thursday. Sergei Lavrov said Russia would discuss ways to bar supplies of sensitive technology to Iran until the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency gets clarification on Iran's nuclear program, Novosti said. He said an original proposal by U.N. Security Council members Russia, China, Britain, France, the United States and Germany outlined incentives designed to persuade Iran to abandon uranium enrichment that is believed to be part of a covert weapons program, Novosti said. In July, the United Nations warned by resolution Iran faced sanctions if it did not suspend its enrichment operations by the end of August. The United States renewed calls for sanctions against Iran, which refused to halt its nuclear program, after negotiations with Iran did not break the impasse, Novosti said. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 10 Guardian Unlimited: Russia Opposes Draft Resolution on Iran From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 6:46 PM AP Photo MOSB103 By HENRY MEYER Associated Press Writer MOSCOW (AP) - Russia signaled its opposition Thursday to a draft U.N. Security Council resolution proposed by European nations that would impose sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program, calling it a departure from existing agreements between world powers. Russia and China, veto-wielding permanent members of the council that have strong commercial ties with Tehran, have been reluctant to support sanctions against Iran. A key concern for Moscow is the future of its $1 billion contract to build Iran's first nuclear power station. ``Our goal is to eliminate the risks of sensitive technologies getting into the hands of Iran until the IAEA (the International Atomic Energy Agency) clarifies issues of interest to it, while maintaining all possible channels of communication with Iran,'' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in comments on state television. ``And it seems to me that, in this context, the draft resolution clearly does not correspond to those tasks agreed on by the six sides,'' he added, speaking on the sidelines of an international Arctic conference in Russia's far north. The six major powers of United States, Russia, Germany, France, Britain and China have offered Iran incentives to halt uranium enrichment, but Tehran has rejected them. Enrichment can produce material for nuclear power reactors or weapons. European nations this week proposed sanctions - banning the sale of missile and atomic technology to Iran and ending most U.N. help for its nuclear programs - after weeks of exploratory talks with an European Union negotiator ended without progress. The sanctions would impose limits on the Russian-built nuclear power station in the southwestern city of Bushehr, although they do not force an end to it. Russia has consistently rejected U.S. demands to halt work on the project and last month it agreed to supply fuel for the plant in March 2007, enabling the facility to go online in September. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Kislyak said the project was one of several obstacles holding up agreement on the U.N. resolution. ``Lengthy negotiations will be needed to find a mutually acceptable solution,'' he was quoted as saying by Interfax news agency. Washington has been pushing for even tougher sanctions, and Richard Grenell, spokesman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations, said Wednesday there would be ``American changes to the proposed European text.'' He refused to elaborate. In Paris, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei said consultations would continue at U.N. headquarters to try and win the Russians over. ``We have taken note of the Russian declarations. ... We will now pursue discussions in New York,'' he said. Iranian state radio voiced confidence that Russia's opposition to the draft resolution could thwart the EU's moves against the Iranian nuclear program. ``If Russia opposes the resolution, then Europe's position in further negotiations with Iran would be worse than it is now,'' the radio said in a commentary, adding that ``sanctions would not be effective, satisfactory or conclusive.'' In a sign of Russia's determination to safeguard the Bushehr contract, the head of the Russian state company that is building the power plant said Thursday it would be completed on time. ``All work on the nuclear power station is being carried out in line with the existing timetable,'' Atomstroiexport's chief Sergei Shmatko was quoted as saying by ITAR-Tass news agency. --- Associated Press writers Angela Charlton in Paris and Nasser Karimi in Tehran, Iran, contributed to this report. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 11 UN Nuclear Watchdog Chief Calls For Talks With Dpr Korea, Iran Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:10:46 -0400 UN NUCLEAR WATCHDOG CHIEF CALLS FOR TALKS WITH DPR KOREA, IRAN New York, Oct 23 2006 10:00AM The head of the United Nations atomic watchdog is calling for talks with both the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and Iran to resolve the issues of their nuclear programmes. “If I look at the problems that we are facing right now – the Korean situation, the Iran situation – these problems hinge, in my view, on the parties sitting together,” UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei said in an <"http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Transcripts/2006/newsweek201006.html">interview with Newsweek magazine ahead of his scheduled meeting today with United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Washington. “We need to move away from the idea that dialogue is a “reward” for good behaviour. You need dialogue when you have bad behaviour, because the purpose of the dialogue is to change the behaviour. As former [US] secretary of State James Baker said recently, talking to your enemy is not appeasement,” he added. Asked about US assertions that Iran, despite its repeated denials, has a nuclear weapons programme, Mr. ElBaradei reiterated his previous statements that the jury is still out, adding that it was difficult to determine whether the Iranians intend to pursue a nuclear weapon, or are simply hedging their bet by developing their enrichment capability. “But one of the lessons we learned from Iraq (where a current nuclear weapons programme was not found after the US-led invasion of 2003) is that we really need to be very, very careful coming to conclusions because these issues make the difference between war and peace,” he declared. “And as long as I know, and I am supported by all intelligence agencies in this, that Iran in the worst-case scenario is still a few years away, I have ample time to talk to them, I have ample time to negotiate with them, and I need to encourage them to cooperate with me.” Asked whether he thought the IAEA would be blamed for the DPRK’s development of atomic weapons, Mr. ElBaradei noted that the agency was “kicked out” in 2003 when the country withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). “We lost jurisdiction. But I have been saying for the last two or three years that North Korea is the No. 1 security challenge to the NPT. I saw North Korea out of the [treaty] regime; I saw North Korea having plutonium; I saw North Korea feeling more and more isolated. I saw this coming,” he said. As he has in other recent statements, he stressed that the IAEA’s annual budget of $120 million was insufficient and should be at least doubled to enable it to have independent satellite-monitoring and a state-of-the-art laboratory for particle analysis. “There is a difference between us and the (UN) Universal Postal Union. You can postpone issuing commemorative stamps or improving the efficiency of mail delivery,” he stressed. “But in our areas there are certain things that we have to do yesterday, because otherwise we are going to face a colossal danger. And people do not understand that. They do not prioritize.” 2006-10-23 00:00:00.000 ___________________ For more details go to UN News Centre at http://www.un.org/news To listen to news and in-depth programmes from UN Radio go to: http://radio.un.org/ _______________________________ To change your profile or unsubscribe go to: http://www.un.org/apps/news/email/ ***************************************************************** 12 UN Nuclear Chief Meets With Us Secretary Rice; Calls For Talks With Dpr Korea, Iran Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:10:45 -0400 UN NUCLEAR CHIEF MEETS WITH US SECRETARY RICE; CALLS FOR TALKS WITH DPR KOREA, IRAN New York, Oct 23 2006 3:00PM The head of the United Nations atomic watchdog met today with United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in Washington to discuss the nuclear programmes of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and Iran, shortly after calling for talks with both countries. “If I look at the problems that we are facing right now – the Korean situation, the Iran situation – these problems hinge, in my view, on the parties sitting together,” UN International Atomic Energy Agency (<"http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2006/dg_usa.html">IAEA) Director General Mohamed ElBaradei said in an <"http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Transcripts/2006/newsweek20102006.html">interview published in Newsweek magazine ahead of the meeting. “We need to move away from the idea that dialogue is a “reward” for good behaviour. You need dialogue when you have bad behaviour, because the purpose of the dialogue is to change the behaviour. As former [US] secretary of State James Baker said recently, talking to your enemy is not appeasement,” he added. Asked about US assertions that Iran, despite its repeated denials, has a nuclear weapons programme, Mr. ElBaradei reiterated his previous statements that the jury is still out, adding that it was difficult to determine whether the Iranians intend to pursue a nuclear weapon, or are simply hedging their bet by developing their enrichment capability. “But one of the lessons we learned from Iraq (where a current nuclear weapons programme was not found after the US-led invasion of 2003) is that we really need to be very, very careful coming to conclusions because these issues make the difference between war and peace,” he declared. “And as long as I know, and I am supported by all intelligence agencies in this, that Iran in the worst-case scenario is still a few years away, I have ample time to talk to them, I have ample time to negotiate with them, and I need to encourage them to cooperate with me.” Asked whether he thought the IAEA would be blamed for the DPRK’s development of atomic weapons, Mr. ElBaradei noted that the agency was “kicked out” in 2003 when the country withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). “We lost jurisdiction. But I have been saying for the last two or three years that North Korea is the No. 1 security challenge to the NPT. I saw North Korea out of the [treaty] regime; I saw North Korea having plutonium; I saw North Korea feeling more and more isolated. I saw this coming,” he said. As he has in other recent statements, he stressed that the IAEA’s annual budget of $120 million was insufficient and should be at least doubled to enable it to have independent satellite-monitoring and a state-of-the-art laboratory for particle analysis. “There is a difference between us and the [UN] Universal Postal Union. You can postpone issuing commemorative stamps or improving the efficiency of mail delivery,” he stressed. “But in our areas there are certain things that we have to do yesterday, because otherwise we are going to face a colossal danger. And people do not understand that. They do not prioritize.” 2006-10-23 00:00:00.000 ___________________ For more details go to UN News Centre at http://www.un.org/news To listen to news and in-depth programmes from UN Radio go to: http://radio.un.org/ _______________________________ To change your profile or unsubscribe go to: http://www.un.org/apps/news/email/ ***************************************************************** 13 Guardian Unlimited: South Korea Enforces Sanctions on North From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 5:16 PM AP Photo SEL802 By TANALEE SMITH Associated Press Writer SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - South Korea made its first concrete move Thursday to enforce U.N. sanctions imposed on North Korea for its nuclear test, saying it will ban officials from the communist country who fall under a U.N. travel restriction and control financial transactions between the rivals. Meanwhile, a South Korean Defense Ministry report underscored the lingering threat posed by the North, saying the regime is believed to have enough plutonium to make as many as seven nuclear bombs. The North is also working to make a small, lightweight nuclear warhead that can be carried by ballistic missile, according to the report released by an opposition lawmaker. The U.N. resolution, passed in response to the North's underground nuclear blast on Oct. 9, seeks to ban the country's weapons trade and calls for North Korean ships to be searched for suspected illegal materials. The resolution asks all member countries to state how they plan to implement the sanctions within 30 days of its Oct. 14 adoption. Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok said Seoul would ban some North Korean officials from traveling to the South and control transactions and remittances related to inter-Korean trade and investment with Pyongyang, the South's Yonhap news agency reported. It was unclear how tough the South will be in enforcing the restrictions. Seoul had been hesitant to take strong measures to support the sanctions, mindful of North Korea's massive armed forces poised at the border, its family and cultural ties, and its wish to expand economic relations with its neighbor. Also at issue was whether South Korea would expand its participation in a U.S.-led drive to interdict North Korean ships and aircraft suspected of carrying weapons of mass destruction or related material. South Korea has been reluctant to participate fully in the Proliferation Security Initiative because of concerns it could lead to clashes with North Korea and undermine efforts to persuade the communist state to give up its nuclear ambitions through diplomacy. Still, Seoul's announcement is certain to be welcomed in Washington, where Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Wednesday urged South Korea to show ``a strong commitment'' to the sanctions. On Wednesday, Pyongyang warned that any move by the South to impose trade, travel and financial sanctions would be seen as a ``declaration of confrontation'' that would elicit ``corresponding measures'' from the North. It also said sanctions could cause a breakdown in inter-Korean relations. ``If North-South relations collapse due to reckless and imprudent sanctions against us the South Korean authorities will be fully responsible for it and will have to pay a high price,'' said a statement carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency. South Korea rejected the North's warning Thursday. ``If North Korea is concerned about the future of Korean people, it should not aggravate the situation any more (and) return immediately to the six-party talks,'' the Unification Ministry said, referring to negotiations among the two Koreas, the U.S., Japan, China and Russia aimed at resolving the nuclear standoff. The South Korean Defense Ministry report on the North's nuclear capabilities was based on a meeting of top military officials a day after the North's test. The report says the North is believed to have extracted 110 pounds of high-grade plutonium, enough for up to seven nuclear weapons. The North can use its Russian-made bombers to drop the bombs, the ministry said, adding that the North has 82 Il-28 bombers at bases in Uiju and Jangjin. North Korea also has built a nuclear warhead weighing some two to three tons. To be mounted on a missile, the warhead would need to be less than a ton, the ministry said. The North stunned the world in 1998 by firing a long-range ballistic missile over Japan into the Pacific. It also test-fired seven missiles in July, including a long-range missile believed capable of reaching the U.S. that crashed shortly after launch. Meanwhile, a Japanese Foreign Ministry official said Japan wants a meeting with the U.S. and South Korea as soon as possible to solidify a common stance on the North Korean nuclear standoff. Their foreign ministers met in Seoul last week. ``Of course it's quite important to consolidate the three nations on the issues,'' the official said on condition of anonymity, citing ministry protocol. ``It's important for us to have such meetings as soon as possible.'' Also Thursday, a leading international think tank warned of a looming humanitarian crisis in North Korea, saying more people could try to flee amid increased isolation and food shortages. The Brussels-based International Crisis Group urged regional governments to improve their treatment of more than 9,000 North Korean refugees in the region. ``There's a very real possibility that the nuclear crisis will be followed by a humanitarian crisis,'' said Peter Beck, head of the group's Seoul office. ``The more belligerent the North is, the less the world wants to help them, no matter how much you try and separate politics from humanitarian issues.'' --- Associated Press Writers Jae-soon Chang in Seoul and Hans Greimel in Tokyo contributed to this report. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 14 Korea Herald: New estimate of N.K. WMDs The South Korean military estimates that North Korea possesses up to 50 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium, enough to make up to seven nuclear weapons, government data released by a lawmaker said yesterday. The military also assesses the North is now studying ways to reduce the size of its nuclear warheads so they can be deployed on ballistic missiles, according to the report which was unveiled by Rep. Song Young-sun of the opposition Grand National Party. The estimates are the result of a meeting between top military officers, a day after the North's nuclear test on Oct. 9. The new report suggests a marginal increase in previous estimates of the North's nuclear weapons capability. The Defense Ministry had said North Korea was believed to have one or two devices using plutonium which had been extracted in the early 1990s. It was believed the North possessed about 40 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium. In the updated assessment, the Defense Ministry also suggests the device tested earlier this month weighed about 2 to 3 tons. Military officials reported to Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung that if a 20-kiloton nuclear weapon was dropped in Yongsan, Seoul, there would be more than 1.2 million casualties, including 211 thousand deaths. The report was based on a U.S. government simulation. One kiloton is equivalent with 1,000 kilograms of TNT in destructive power. The report said such a nuclear detonation could result in widespread radiological contamination within 24 hours in a radius of some 28 kilometers from the detonation site, reaching many of Seoul's satellite cities. An explosion would also produce electronic pulses that can paralyze operations of electronic devices within 2-10 kilometers from ground zero. The South Korean military also reported that North Korea maintains 82 IL-28 jet bombers that can carry its nuclear weapons to South Korea. The bombers are deployed in the western city of Uiju and an eastern airbase in Jangjin, the report said. (davidpooh@heraldm.com) By Jin Dae-woong 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 15 Korea Herald: U.S. to explain nuke umbrella The commander of the U.S. Forces Korea will hold a press briefing next week to explain Washington's position on its provision of a nuclear umbrella for Korea, and issues related to the transfer of wartime operational control. During the briefing planned for Oct. 30, Gen. Burwell Bell, will clarify what order was assigned to him regarding the confirmed U.S. pledge of the "continuation of the extended deterrence offered by the U.S. nuclear umbrella." The phrase "extended deterrence," which was newly codified in a joint communique last week after defense ministers' talks, has prompted clashes between Korean and U.S. officials over its exact interpretation. Korean officials interpreted the term as meaning an upgraded U.S. nuclear defense commitment with concrete and detailed contents, while U.S. officials say it is not much different from the previous wording. Bell is also expected to speak about the U.S. position on the agreed target year for the wartime control transfer. Korea and the United States agreed last week to transfer wartime control between 2009 and 2012. Korean officials have said that following the agreement, Korea would take back the operational control by its original target year of 2012. Seoul had hoped to transfer the control by 2012 while Washington had claimed that 2009 would be more appropriate. (davidpooh@heraldm.com) By Jin Dae-woong 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 16 Korea Herald: U.S. to impose 'India-Pakistan sanctions' on N.K. WASHINGTON - The United States will impose the kind of sanctions against North Korea that were taken on India and Pakistan after their nuclear tests in 1998, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday. The U.N.-invoked sanctions, in the meantime, should remain in place even if North Korea returns to nuclear negotiations, until Pyongyang has made progress in the talks, she said. Speaking at the Washington-based think tank Heritage Foundation, the secretary specifically referred to the Glenn Amendment of 1994 as steps the U.S. would take in addition to the U.N. sanctions. "As for our part, the United States is now obligated to adopt additional sanctions on North Korea under national legislation, including the Glenn Amendment," Rice said. The Glenn Amendment allows the U.S. president to apply sanctions when a non-nuclear weapons state detonates a nuclear device. Rice gently prodded South Korea to show a strong commitment to international sanctions. Rice said the U.S. has no wish to tell Seoul how it should coexist with its neighbor and noted the vigorous debate in South Korea over the future of its "sunshine policy" of partial rapprochement. But she said North Korea's test of a nuclear device Oct. 9 "requires a strong response," and said that adherence to a U.N. resolution banning the sale of weapons material, luxury goods and more to North Korea is key. The sanctions also seek interception of ships believed to be carrying suspect materials. "It requires a strong commitment by South Korea," she told the conservative Heritage Foundation. "Any activities need to be seen in the light of making certain to implement that resolution." The secretary had returned from an extensive trip last week to Northeast Asia and Russia, where she tried to drum up support for full implementation of the U.N. resolution. Sanctions against India, which conducted the test in May 1998, included prohibition of activities funded under the foreign assistance act, U.S. government credit and other financial assistance by U.S. agencies. Foreign military sales and financing were also prohibited, along with export licenses for certain munitions and dual-use goods. The U.S. also opposed loans and other assistance to India by international institutions. Assistance restrictions were already in force at the time of Pakistan's nuclear test, also conducted in May 1998, and the U.S. added new measures to restrict credit and credit guarantees, limit commercial exports of munitions and dual-use items, and restrict commercial bank lending to the Pakistani government. A congressional directive prohibited the U.S. from supporting nonbasic human-needs lending by international financial institutions. China and Russia, two veto-wielding members of the Security Council with still-strong ties to North Korea, have argued that U.N. sanctions should be lifted once North Korea returns to the six-nation nuclear disarmament talks. South and North Korea, the U.S., China, Russia and Japan are members of the talks that have not been held since November last year due to Pyongyang's boycott. Rice, however, said North Korea's return is not enough. "We all agreed that if those talks resume, Resolution 1718 would remain in force until North Korea has made progress on denuclearization," she said. Meanwhile, President George W. Bush pledged to keep up efforts to resolve the North Korea nuclear standoff diplomatically, despite Pyongyang's warning of the risk of war if South Korea joins U.S.-led sanctions. "The leader of North Korea likes to threaten," Bush told a White House news conference. "What he's doing is just testing the will of the five countries that are working together to convince him there is a better way forward for his people." Bush spoke after North Korea warned South Korea its participation in sanctions would be seen as a serious provocation leading to a "crisis of war" on the Korean peninsula. "Our goal is to continue to remind our partners that when we work together, we're more likely to be able to achieve the objective, which is to solve this problem diplomatically," Bush said when asked about the North Korean threat. 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 17 Korea Herald: [NEWS FOCUS]Seoul caving in to pressure over PSI The South Korean government is widely expected to pledge a stronger commitment to the Proliferation Security Initiative, officials said yesterday. "It is widely believed that the government will agree to raise its level of commitment in the antiweapons regime to possibly be sworn in as a full-time member," said one government official speaking anonymously. The PSI is a voluntary international regime initiated by the United States in 2003 to help fight the global proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The government and the Uri Party are likely to reach a decision on participating in the PSI following parliamentary committee meetings on North Korean affairs this week. South Korea has so far held out from full participation for fear of sparking intensified naval confrontations with the North. The PSI calls for members to actively seize and search ships suspected to be carrying weapons or related materials. But pressure from Washington to become an active member has been unfaltering since the outbreak of North Korea's Oct. 9 nuclear blast. "For Washington, it's all about principle now. It plans to stick to its principles for fighting weapons of mass destruction and it has the international backup. Since North Korea is on the top of its blacklist, Washington is unlikely to ease up on its demands for Seoul to join as one of its top allies," said Lee Sang-hyun, director of security studies at the Sejong Institute. On Wednesday, North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland said "North Korea would take relevant countermeasures should South Korea join in the U.S. oppression against the North," in a statement. In a rare tit-for-tat, the Unification Ministry said it would "rightfully respect and implement the United Nations Security Council resolution (on North Korea)." The ministry also called on Pyongyang to "return unconditionally to the six-party talks," echoing U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Parliament remains divided over PSI membership. The ruling Uri Party, which equally blames Pyongyang and Washington for North Korea's nuclear test, is opposed, while the majority opposition Grand National Party sees full membership as the key to regaining international trust and warding off the North Korean threat. Critics claim that South Korea-U.S. ties lie in tatters due to the ongoing conflict triggered by the widely varying North Korean policies undertaken by presidents Roh Moo-hyun and George W. Bush. Roh's engagement policies are considered far more lenient compared to Bush's bellicose stance. "It's time to show the world and the United States that South Korea is committed to the denuclearization of the peninsula," said the GNP in a recent statement. The Foreign Ministry said the government has now begun drafting a report for the U.N. Security Council on follow-up measures to its resolution. The PSI and key inter-Korean projects - tours to North Korea's Mount Geumgang and the Gaeseong industrial complex - are expected to be central topics. (jemmie@heraldm.com) By Kim Ji-hyun 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 18 Korea Herald: [EDITORIAL]Sweeping reshuffle President Roh Moo-hyun is set to conduct a sweeping reshuffle involving almost all members of his foreign and security team. This should provide an opportunity for Roh to establish a new policy on North Korea and improve relations with the United States, which have been strained over the communist state's recent acts of provocation. The personnel change was necessitated after the ministers of foreign affairs, unification, and defense offered to resign from their posts. Its scope will be expanded if the director of the National Intelligence Service should also decide to quit. At first, a comprehensive change to the foreign and security team was not being considered. According to a news report, Roh had intended to limit the personnel change to naming someone to replace Foreign Minister Ban Kim-moon, who is leaving to take up his post of U.N. secretary-general. But Roh had to change this plan when the ministers of unification and defense also offered to quit. This will prove beneficial to Roh, who is required, though reluctantly, to make a fresh start with a new team. He has no other option because Pyongyang's recent nuclear test rendered useless his policy of providing enormous amounts of aid for the poverty-stricken North, and supposedly using it as leverage in discouraging the reclusive communist state from rocking the boat. The ultimate goal of a North Korea policy is to remove any threat to the security of the South. Judging by this criterion, Roh's policy has been discredited to a great extent. Tension has escalated since North Korea launched ballistic missiles in July and tested a nuclear device earlier this month, pitting the communist state against the rest of the world. It is time for Roh to acknowledge his policy has failed and shift its focus from carrots to sticks. But he is hesitating to make a policy shift befitting the new security environment that has drastically changed since the nuclear test. That misguided attitude is evidenced by the remarks of his spokesman, who says the president will not make any change in his basic foreign and security policy, despite the North Korean nuclear test. No less mistaken is Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok, Roh's point man for his North Korea policy. He says he is resigning not because he has made any serious mistake in conducting the North Korea policy, but because a more competent person is needed to prevent it from becoming an object of endless political strife. In a futile attempt to defend himself, he argues the policy he has pursued has produced many positive results, such as inter-Korean reconciliation. But to what use can they be put when they are overshadowed by the nuclear threat? Roh will have to go beyond his narrow pool of talent in selecting candidates to the ministerial positions of foreign affairs and national security. He will need the highest level of expertise and competence that can be found among all potential candidates if he is to deal effectively with the pressing foreign policy and security issues. A first test of his new team will come when the nation begins to join the U.N.-mandated international sanctions against North Korea. South Korea will have to walk a tightrope between the duty it must discharge as a responsible U.N. member, and the extra care it should take in order not to provoke the North into armed conflict. The team will also have to ponder the extent to which it will have to participate in the Proliferation Security Initiative, a U.S. program to prevent the flow of weapons of mass destruction to and from suspect states or non-state actors. It will have to determine, for instance, what to do about suspect North Korean ships under the PSI. 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 19 Korea Herald: Seoul to bar N.K. arms officials The South Korean government will block any North Korean officials suspected of taking part in nuclear weapons programs from entering, Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok said yesterday. The decision is part of South Korea's measures under U.N. Resolution 1718. Seoul's sanctions are likely to consist of four parts: a ban on supply, sales and transportation of weapons of mass destruction, conventional weapons and luxury items; freezing of assets and prevention of assets being used; inspection of all cargo to and from North Korea; and a ban on entry of personnel and their families suspected of being linked to nuclear or other weapons programs. "The (government) currently controls the entry of all North Korean personnel to the South under Clause 9 of the South-North exchange and cooperation law," Lee said in a parliamentary audit. Lee announced his resignation Wednesday but will stay on until the audit is completed and his successor is named. Lee said that the South Korean government will be able to control or prevent North Koreans entering under the same law when the United Nation's Sanctions Committee draws up a list of suspects to be subjected to the sanctions. It was the first decision to be confirmed since the government began working on antiproliferation measures after the North's Oct. 9 nuclear test. Each U.N. member country must submit to the U.N. Sanctions Committee their proposed sanctions in line with the resolution prohibiting transfer of material, equipment, financial resources or personnel that can be linked to North Korea's nuclear or other WMD programs to or from the North. Lee also said the South Korean government will be taking exclusive steps to condemn the North's nuclear test. Seoul has so far suspended shipment of relief aid and has halted additional rice and fertilizer aid since the North's July missile launches. While Seoul remains committed to keeping the two flagship inter-Korean projects - the Gaeseong industrial park and the Mount Geumgang tours - the level of government participation in the operations is likely to be cut down. "We plan to review the subjects and boundaries for the government's subsidies in terms of economic cooperation and civic-level exchanges in the future," Lee said without elaborating further. South Korea will also remain committed to the five international treaties on weapons of mass destruction that "strictly monitor" export of strategic materials, he said. Lee added that no luxury goods were being admitted to the North from the South but said a revision to the relevant regulation was possible following the Sanction Committee's decision on the definition of "luxury materials." While adding there are no North Korean assets in the South linked to WMD programs, Lee said his government will control any trade, investment, financial payments and fund remittances to North Korean entities designated by the U.N. Sanctions Committee as dangerous. All North Korean vessels using South Korean ports will undergo customs inspections and the authorities will keep track of North Korean cargo in South Korean waters under the South-North maritime agreement, Lee said. He did not specify South Korea's position on the growing calls to expand its participation in the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative. In the meantime, President Roh Moo-hyun's predecessor and designer of the "Sunshine Policy" Kim Dae-jung urged direct talks between Washington and Pyongyang to end the nuclear crisis, in an article printed in Thursday's International Herald Tribune. Kim, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2000 for his epochal summit meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il, said military measures "could reduce the peninsula to ashes and lead to the demise of the 70 million Korean people." He disagreed with the effectiveness of economic sanctions, saying North Koreans were already accustomed to deprivation. He added that assistance from China and other allies might also continue regardless. Kim cited his own quote to U.S. President George W. Bush in 2002, "that dialogue, when necessary for a country's national interest, can be pursued even with the evil" and added that history showed communism was never changed through pressure or containment. (angiely@heraldm.com) By Lee Joo-hee 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 20 Korea Herald: Russia advocates cautious response to N.K. Moscow doubts U.N. sanctions can resolve nuclear standoff This is the seventh in a series of analytical articles about the impact of North Korea's nuclear test. - Ed. By Andrei P. Tsygankov Despite China's success in getting Pyongyang to "apologize" for North Korea's recent nuclear experiment, the test has challenged skeptics of the nation's putative nuclear weapons possession. Some of those who based their skepticism on the absence of the weapons' field testing and lack of qualified personnel in nuclear physics by North Korea now admit that the test has paved a way for future similar developments. Many also acknowledge that Pyongyang has abundantly demonstrated that previous policies of enforcing a nuclear nonproliferation regime have failed. There is no coming back to the status quo ante and, short of some fundamental changes in international politics, the emergence of new nuclear states in Asia and the rest of the world is only a matter of time. Russia's response to the nuclear crisis has reflected these new changes. Despite the significance of the East Asian region for Moscow, the official reactions to North Korea's test have been quite mute. Most officials condemned it, yet they increasingly recognize that North Korea has now become a nuclear power and that the world can no longer be the same. Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov, for instance, suggested the return to the pre-test state of affairs is now impossible. Moscow also ruled out the use of force and efforts of the other five parties to isolate North Korea by applying tough sanctions. In one of his interview in Germany, President Putin stressed, "We need to move from talk of ultimatums and sanctions toward seeing international law prevail in international matters." After much hesitation, Russia has moved to support U.N. resolution 1718 imposing sanctions on the Pyongyang regime. Yet Russia clearly does not believe that sanctions are likely to be the solution. As with the case of Iran, Moscow favors return to negotiations and will be the last to give preference to tough sanctions and military coercion. Three considerations help to make sense of Russia's mute response to the crisis. The first has to do with geographic proximity and Russia's fear that nuclear instability may produce immediate dangerous consequences for its own security. East Asia's long-term security challenges, such as the nuclear ambitions of North Korea and China's relations with Taiwan, continue to affect Russia directly. A shared border with North Korea means, for example, that in case of a nuclear explosion on the Korean Peninsula, Russia would be confronted by the threat of a radioactive cloud and a potential influx of up to 100,000 refugees. Add to this a possible future instability of the Pyongyang regime, and it becomes quite clear what causes Russia concern. In addition to the geographic proximity, the cautious reaction from Russia can be explained by its economic development needs, which require cultivation of special ties with China and South Korea. Both nations have been long-term supporters of engagement policies toward Pyongyang's regime, and Moscow is hardly in a position to have a strong independent stance on the issue. Russia's key priority remains domestic modernization, and new realities of growing energy prices, the recovering economy, a pragmatic leadership, and relative salience of major threats from outside create favorable conditions for its engagement with Asia. For example, although its energy markets are primarily in Europe and accounted for about 50 percent of foreign trade, Russia confirmed its determination to build additional energy pipelines with Asian nations. Two of them will connect Russia and China and run through China and South Korea. Putin also made clear his plans for trilateral cooperation between Russia, South Korea and North Korea. Three developments can serve as a promising avenue in this regard: the link of the Trans-Siberian Railroad to the Trans-Korean Railroad (the so-called "iron silk road"); the East Siberian gas pipeline from Irkutsk's gas-condensate field; and supply of electricity from the Russian Far East. All three projects potentially tie the three nations together, thereby diversifying Russia's ties in the region and preparing the ground for a smoother future unification of Korea. Such engagement with the region would hardly be possible were Russia to ignore the positions of the region's key players. The third reason explaining Russia's carefully measured response to North Korea's test has to do with a balancing policy pursued by Moscow. The central objective of that policy is to achieve a unified Korea that would not be controlled by the United States and instead become Russia's strategic partner in the region. A considerably weakened Russia is also wary of Japan and rising China, and in the words of Chairman of State Duma International Affairs Committee Konstantin Kosachev, such an independent and strong Korea "would balance Chinese and Japanese aspirations in the area of Russia beyond the Urals." The Kremlin understands that reunification of the two Koreas will take place, but it wants the process to proceed in a slow, orderly fashion and on the basis of inter-Korean dialogue. Russia has also sought to work closely with Seoul in resolving past nuclear stalemates, and it was ultimately a similar Russia-South Korea-China position on a denuclearizing North Korea that helped to negotiate a previous settlement. For all these reasons, Russia advocates cautious treatment of North Korea. Russia's insistence on the development of a multilateral security framework as a solution to the crisis is partly a reflection of its own weakness and a way to increase its role in solving vital security issues in the region. Yet it is also a principal policy belief. For years, Russia's officials have argued for the development of a multilateral security framework in the region and outside. In the post-Soviet era, Russia opposed NATO's military intervention in Yugoslavia and America's war in Iraq as lacking the support of the United Nations. The Kremlin does not believe in solving security problems in a unilateral fashion, insisting that they can only be solved successfully through systematic coordination of state efforts, and not through use of force by ad hoc coalitions. Moscow certainly doesn't have readily available solutions to the crisis. Yet it becomes increasingly clear that the existing nuclear nonproliferation regime cannot be sustained by force and coercion. A more promising way to address the problem of proliferation is to look closely at all the leading nuclear powers and their credibility in the world. It is quite clear that an important reason why so many "dangerous" regimes feel compelled to develop their own nuclear programs has to do with the absence of adequate security assurances. Such assurance must come from two directions. First, the United States must exclude any possibility of using nuclear weapons for any other than political objectives. One can hardly speak of assurances of security when the U.S. Defense Department implies that the United States can use nuclear weapons against nonnuclear states. Last year, more than 470 physicists, including seven Nobel laureates, signed a petition to contest the proposal. Second, it is critical to recognize that the nonproliferation regime cannot be sustained if the five original creators of it in 1968 will continue to ignore their own pledge to reduce and, ultimately, eliminate their own nuclear weapons. Developing a comprehensive plan, which would include steps in the direction of disarmament by all involved parties, is a far more productive and responsible way to address the problem than merely trying to pressure Iran, North Korea, or any future nuclear contenders. Such pressures are necessary, but they can only be effective when applied universally, that is to all members of the nuclear club. So far, this has been far from the case. Andrei P. Tsygankov is an associate professor at San Francisco State University and the author of "Russia's Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity (2006)," among many other works. The views expressed here are his own. He can be reached at andrei@sfsu.edu - Ed. 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 21 Korea Herald: Seoul to deny entry to N. Koreans The South Korean government will block any North Korean officials suspected of taking part in nuclear weapons programs from entering, Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok said yesterday. The decision is part of South Korea's measures under U.N. resolution 1718. Seoul's sanctions are likely to consist of four parts: a ban on supply, sales and transportation of weapons of mass destruction, conventional weapons and luxury items; freezing of assets and prevention of assets being used; inspection of all cargo to and from North Korea; and a ban on entry of personnel and their families suspected of being linked to nuclear or other weapons programs. "The (government) currently controls the entry of all North Korean personnel to the South under Clause 9 of the South-North exchange and cooperation law," Lee said in a parliamentary audit. Lee announced his resignation Wednesday but will stay on until the audit is completed and his successor is named. Lee said that the South Korean government will be able to control or prevent North Koreans entering under the same law when the United Nation's Sanctions Committee draws up a list of suspects to be subjected to the sanctions. It was the first decision to be confirmed since the government began working on antiproliferation measures after the North's Oct. 9 nuclear test. Each U.N. member country must submit to the U.N. Sanctions Committee their proposed sanctions in line with the resolution prohibiting transfer of material, equipment, financial resources or personnel that can be linked to North Korea's nuclear or other WMD programs to or from the North. Lee also said the South Korean government will be taking exclusive steps to condemn the North's nuclear test. Seoul has so far suspended shipment of relief aid and has halted additional rice and fertilizer aid since the North's July missile launches. While Seoul remains committed to keeping the two flagship inter-Korean projects - the Gaeseong industrial park and the Mount Geumgang tours - the level of government participation in the operations is likely to be cut down. "We plan to review the subjects and boundaries for the government's subsidies in terms of economic cooperation and civic-level exchanges in the future," Lee said without elaborating further. South Korea will also remain committed to the five international treaties on weapons of mass destruction that "strictly monitor" export of strategic materials, he said. Lee added that no luxury goods were being admitted to the North from the South but said a revision to the relevant regulation was possible following the Sanction Committee's decision on the definition of "luxury materials." While adding there are no North Korean assets in the South linked to WMD programs, Lee said his government will control any trade, investment, financial payments and fund remittances to North Korean entities designated by the U.N. Sanctions Committee as dangerous. All North Korean vessels using South Korean ports will undergo customs inspections and the authorities will keep track of North Korean cargo in South Korean waters under the South-North maritime agreement, Lee said. He did not specify South Korea's position on the growing calls to expand its participation in the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative. In the meantime, President Roh Moo-hyun's predecessor and designer of the "Sunshine Policy" Kim Dae-jung urged direct talks between Washington and Pyongyang to end the nuclear crisis, in an article printed in Thursday's International Herald Tribune. Kim, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2000 for his epochal summit meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il, said military measures "could reduce the peninsula to ashes and lead to the demise of the 70 million Korean people." He disagreed with the effectiveness of economic sanctions, saying North Koreans were already accustomed to deprivation. He added that assistance from China and other allies might also continue regardless. Kim cited his own quote to U.S. President George W. Bush in 2002, "that dialogue, when necessary for a country's national interest, can be pursued even with the evil" and added that history showed communism was never changed through pressure or containment. (angiely@heraldm.com) By Lee Joo-hee 2006.10.27 ***************************************************************** 22 INSIDE JoongAng Daily: Politicians held for contacting North's agent Octorber 27, 2006 KST 13:53 (GMT+9) Democratic Labor Party deputy among 5 persons now in custody October 27, 2006 ¤Ñ Seoul prosecutors and the National Intelligence Service said yesterday they had arrested a senior official of the Democratic Labor Party on charges of contacting a North Korean agent during a visit to China. His arrest and that of one other suspect were a significant enlargement of an investigation into 1980s-era student activists. So far, at least five people, including incumbent and former officials of the left-wing political party, are in the prosecution's sights. Sources at the prosecution said the five could eventually be charged with espionage, but it appears that the authorities do not yet have sufficient evidence to accuse them formally of that crime. For the present, those in custody have been charged with unauthorized contacts with a North Korean. Investigators from the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutors Office and the intelligence agency raided the home of Lee Jeong-hun, a former central committee member of the Democratic Labor Party, on Tuesday and detained him for alleged violations of the National Security Law. Yesterday, the prosecution said it had applied for warrants to extend his detention and to keep two other activists arrested at the same time, Jang Min-ho and Sohn Jong-mok, in custody. Prosecutors said all three visited China in March for meetings with a North Korean agent. Mr. Sohn and Mr. Jang also allegedly traveled to North Korea via China without South Korean government authorization. Yesterday, the investigation widened with the arrest of Choi Gi-yeong, deputy secretary general of the Democratic Labor Party, and another activist. They were also charged with contacting a North Korean agent in China. "We obtained the arrest warrants early in the morning and took Mr. Choi into custody at his home," Ahn Chang-ho, a prosecutor in charge of the case, said yesterday. "The National Intelligence Service is currently questioning Mr. Choi." The pair allegedly accompanied Mr. Lee when he contacted the North Korean spy, the prosecution said, adding that the investigation would focus on the possibility that they had received instructions from the agent and engaged in "anti-government activities" after returning to this country. Such activities would also support an espionage charge. Mr. Jang, a 44-year-old game developer and former student activist, was accused of working under the North's orders for more than a decade. After dropping out of Sung Kyun Kwan University in Seoul during his sophomore year, prosecutors said, he went to the United States and was a pro-North Korean activist there. Officials added that he is believed to have visited North Korea three times since the mid-1980s. During the raid at Mr. Jang's home, investigators reportedly seized documents with instructions on how to contact and report to a North Korean agent. The prosecution said Mr. Jang admitted to some of the charges and waived his right to a court hearing on a detention warrant. The Seoul Central District Court heard the cases for warrants yesterday against Mr. Lee and Mr. Sohn. Mr. Lee contended he was in China on business and had received no instructions from North Korean agents. "This is a Roh administration conspiracy to suppress civic movements and to create instability," he complained. Mr. Lee, a history graduate of Korea University, was a well-known student activist. He was arrested in 1985 for leading the occupation of American Cultural Center in central Seoul. He was also convicted in 2000 of trying to enter North Korea by sea. The Democratic Labor Party complained in a statement yesterday that the arrests were "clear political oppression" of the party. It demanded the release of all those arrested, accused the spy agency of fabricating evidence in a conspiracy to maintain its influence and demanded the repeal of the National Security Law. by Kim Jong-moon, Ser Myo-ja myoja@joongang.co.kr> Copyright by Joins.com, Inc. ***************************************************************** 23 INSIDE JoongAng Daily: Seoul bars some visits from across the DMZ Octorber 27, 2006 KST 13:53 (GMT+9) October 27, 2006 ¤Ñ Seoul will ban the entry to South Korea of North Koreans linked to its nuclear program in the first tangible reaction to the North's Oct. 9 nuclear test and the United Nations sanctions that followed. Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok, appearing at an inspection hearing at the National Assembly, said that the travel ban was in line with the terms of the UN sanctions restricting such travel. In addition to barring the entry of such people, Mr. Lee said, the government would also bar any financial transfers linked to them. The minister said that Seoul was not considering a ban on shipments of luxury goods to North Korea but would do so if specific items were designated by a UN sanctions committee as falling under the terms of the UN resolution. Seoul suspended shipments of rice and fertilizer to North Korea after the nuclear test but has not announced whether those shipments will be canceled or merely delayed. The minister's remarks came a day after Pyongyang warned of consequences if Seoul cooperated in enforcing the UN sanctions. Separately yesterday, the ministry issued a statement pledging to follow the UN guidelines. The ministry has made clear its desire that North-South economic projects, such as tourism at a resort on North Korea's east coast and an industrial complex, continue operating. The administration is still pondering whether those programs should go on despite calls from the United States to shut down at least the tourism program. It is also trying to decide whether to join the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative, which seeks to block international trade in missile components and material for weapons of mass destruction. The warning from Pyongyang also called that program a military operation to enforce a blockade of its ports. Switzerland announced Wednesday that it would impose sanctions on North Korea in line with the UN resolution. The federal economic ministry said luxury goods exports to North Korea, including watches, would be banned. Washington has frozen the U.S. assets of a Swiss company with alleged links to a North Korean firm involved in mass weapons development. Japan has imposed wide-ranging sanctions on North Korea; Australia has announced a sanctions regime and pledged to provide military assets to assist in enforcing the UN sanctions resolution. by Brian Lee africanu@joongang.co.kr> Copyright by Joins.com, Inc. Terms of Use | ***************************************************************** 24 Korea Times: North Korea Has 50 Kg of Plutonium Hankooki.com > The Korea Times > Nation By Jung Sung-ki Staff Reporter The South Korean military believes North Korea possesses about 50 kilograms of plutonium, enough to make six to seven nuclear bombs, a lawmaker said yesterday. The North is proceeding with a nuclear weapon design that would be small and light enough to mount atop a missile, Rep. Song Young-sun of the main opposition Grand National Party (GNP) said. Those analyses were made during a hurriedly arranged meeting of generals on Oct. 10, a day after North Korea detonated a nuclear device, defying the international community, according to a Defense Ministry document submitted to the legislator. Pyongyang is believed to have been accumulating plutonium for a bomb since the mid-1980s. It froze the program in 1994 under an agreement with the United States, but the accord broke down in late 2002, and North Korea is believed to have ramped up production after that. During the meeting of top military brass, intelligence that Pyongyang is deploying 82 Russian IL-28 bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons in air bases in Uiju and Changjin was reported to Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung, the document said. The military leaders stressed the importance of a stronger U.S. nuclear umbrella to cope with the North¡¯s nuclear threat, it said. They also agreed on the need to revise a joint contingency plan with the U.S. military in case of instability in North Korea, such as the collapse of the communist regime and mass defections or a revolt, the document said. gallantjung@koreatimes.co.kr 10-26-2006 17:57 ***************************************************************** 25 Korea Times: Effectiveness of UN Panel on N. Korea Questioned Hankooki.com > The Korea Times By Kim Sue-young Staff Reporter A committee of the United Nations Security Council cannot punish nations that do not impose sanctions on North Korea as stipulated in the resolution on the North, a U.S. expert said yesterday. The committee was launched last Monday to monitor whether states comply with their obligations to sanction the Stalinist state for its nuclear test on Oct. 9 but some have cast doubt on the committee's role. ``The effectiveness of the committee varies from case to case and really depends on the commitment of the key parties,'' Kimberley Elliott, a senior fellow of the Institute of International Economics (IIE), a nongovernmental think tank, said in an interview with Radio Free Asia (RFA). There was a committee under the Security Council to sanction a certain country but it is just used to supervise the fulfillment of the resolutions rather than make a decision on punishment, she said. ``I think it's more symbolic than real,'' the researcher said. According to the U.N. resolution adopted on Oct. 14, U.N. member nations should report to the committee how they have specifically taken action against the reclusive North Korean regime. The committee has a right to investigate and take measures against nations that violate the sanctions, she said. Violations should be referred to the Security Council to correct offenses but they are difficult issues to resolve if permanent members of the council break the rule, Elliott said. ksy@koreatimes.co.kr 10-26-2006 17:39 ***************************************************************** 26 Korea Times: USFK Chief to Meet Journalists Hankooki.com > The Korea Times > Nation SEOUL (Yonhap) _ The top U.S. military commander in South Korea will hold a press conference next week amid growing controversies over the agreements at bilateral military talks earlier this month, his office said Thursday. Gen. B. B. Bell, the chief of 30,000 U.S. troops here, is to meet the media on Monday to explain the results of annual defense ministerial talks, called the Security Consultative Meeting (SCM), in Washington on Oct. 20, the office said in a statement. After the talks, South Korea and the United States issued a joint communique, in which the U.S. pledged the ¡° continuation of the extended deterrence offered by the U.S. nuclear umbrella.¡± The phrase prompted debate over whether that meant the United States showed strengthened, concrete resolve to extend its nuclear umbrella, as North Korea caused a global uproar by detonating a nuclear device on Oct. 9. 10-26-2006 22:04 ***************************************************************** 27 Korea Times: [Michael Breen] Ethics of Sunshine Hankooki.com > The Korea Times > Opinion By Michael Breen Five years ago, a Chinese ship called the Chuxing visiting the port of Pusan was found to be carrying 91 kilograms of methamphetamine. Customs officials and prosecutors let it go. Two years later, officials nabbed 45 kgs of the same drugs from the same vessel. Again, they let it go. In fact, according to customs and prosecution data, the plucky Chuxing has been caught smuggling drugs and counterfeit cigarettes no less than 12 times. And I think we may safely assume that on many occasions its cargo has made it unobserved into the Korean market. The normal explanation for such a limp-wristed approach to law enforcement would be corruption: the gangsters must have got to the customs people. Or maybe they had a man on the inside. But in this case, it¡¯s something else. The Chuxing is distinct because it plies an unusual route. For many years, it has been making a weekly run between Pusan and the North Korean port of Rajin. Yes, it¡¯s those North Koreans again. This time, they¡¯re running drugs and counterfeits into South Korea. But the authorities here have been turning a blind eye in the greater interests of the sunshine engagement policy with North Korea. You¡¯d think that this story, revealed last week by a national assemblyman, would have billowed into a national scandal. But it does not appear to have stirred much interest in the Korean press and society. That, in this foreign observer¡¯s opinion, is because it represents a type of moral lapse that typifies this society: my willingness to subvert the rules for the perceived greater good of whatever it is that I want to do. There are good historical reasons for this. The law was never an arbiter of justice in Korea. Rather, it was employed by the powerful to justify their abuse of the weak. But in modern democratic Korea, the inability to overcome this deep aversion to the rule of law explains why citizens have such a low level of trust of one another and of their institutions. The Chuxing revelation should have the effect of a grenade rolled into the church of North-South unification. It¡¯s certainly timely. Not only, we find, has North Korea¡¯s morally crippled regime been building nuclear weapons while we¡¯ve been feeding its people, but it¡¯s also been using our ships (Chuxing is owned by a Korean) to peddle drugs to gangsters who prey on our young people. Right now, the international community is debating whether South Korea should continue its turn-the-other-cheek engagement policy with North Korea, or whether it should side with the U.S. in its squeeze-¡®em-till-the-pips-squeak sanctions approach. Both policies have moral right on their side and both could produce results. What makes them worthy of equal consideration in the public debate is that they are policies considered and undertaken by democracies, proposed in an honorable fashion, guided by law, and mindful of individual rights and all that. But suddenly those qualifications seem absent. Such things happen. The most glaring example in recent years is the American-led invasion of Iraq, the pre-emptive nature of which in retrospect seems to have been entirely unjustified. The suggestion that the case for war was argued with deception puts it, in the minds of tens of millions of people, up there with rogue acts conducted by dictatorships. It is the biggest global controversy of the decade. America fortunately is such an open country that it can correct itself. The debate can continue because that democratic, legal underpinning remains strong. But can we say the same about Korea? Ironically, there is no need for correction for the ship of government has not even listed. President Roh¡¯s sunshine policy should have been majorly discredited _ not just because of North Korea¡¯s behavior, but also because of his own government¡¯s willingness to allow drug running to go unpunished. But, it hasn¡¯t. In fact, that ship might already be back in Pusan. 10-26-2006 19:35 ***************************************************************** 28 AFP: Six-party talks only route for US dialogue with North Korea - Hill - Thu Oct 26, 10:20 AM ET NADI (AFP) - Stalled six-party talks have to restart for the US to talk to North Korea" /> North Korea, following the isolated regime's nuclear test earlier this month, US Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said Thursday. "The North Koreans haven't expressed an interest in having a dialogue with anyone really," Hill told reporters on the sidelines of a meeting of Pacific Island Forum countries in Fiji. "We've made very clear that if they come back to the (six-party) process, we're certainly prepared to talk to them directly," he said. Hill was asked about calls for the US to engage in direct dialogue with Kim Jong-Il's regime following the October 9 declared nuclear test. But Hill said the six-party agreement was very important to the US, because it ensured a united stand by countries in the region over North Korea's nuclear ambitions. North Korea's nuclear test caused a global uproar with the UN Security Council issuing a resolution imposing economic sanctions aimed at curbing Pyongyang's weapons program. Threats by Pyongyang against South Korea" /> South Koreaover adopting sanctions imposed after the test flew in the face of Seoul's clear undertaking to follow the resolution "to the letter", said Hill, who has responsibility for East Asian and Pacific affairs. North Korea needed to understand UN Security Council resolutions were binding on everyone, he said. "North Korea needs to take some time to think about this, and get themselves back to the table and back to what the United Nations" /> United Nationshas demanded that it do," he said. North Korea pulled out of the six-nation talks in November last year in protest at financial sanctions imposed by Washington against Pyongyang for alleged money-laundering and counterfeiting. Aside from the US and North Korea, the other nations involved in the talks are China, South Korea, Japan and Russia. Returning to the talks is one of the key planks of the UN Security Council resolution imposed against North Korea for conducting its nuclear test. Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso said Wednesday his country should reopen the debate on whether to develop a nuclear weapon capability in light of the North Korean programme. "We need to discuss once again why Japan came to decide not to possess nuclear arms," Aso told a parliamentary foreign affairs committee. "On the assumption that North Korea really owns nuclear arms now, the situation in the Far East has changed drastically. "We should discuss if Japan can stay as it is." But Hill said Japan's non-nuclear policy remained intact. Hill recently travelled with US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice to Japan and South Korea, following the North Korean test. "We understand from the Japanese that they have had no change in their policy against developing, importing or using nuclear weapons, so there is no change in Japan," he said. "Proliferation of that kind is something we all need to be concerned about, it's one of the reasons why Secretary of State Rice wanted to get out there to assure our allies that the US is prepared to use all our deterrent capability if South Korea or Japan is threatened." Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The ***************************************************************** 29 AFP: SKorea makes first move to enforce UN sanctions on North - Thu Oct 26, 7:33 AM ET SEOUL (AFP) - South Korea" /> South Koreahas announced its first moves to enforce UN sanctions against North Korea" /> North Koreaas the leaders of China and France expressed serious concern over the communist state's landmark nuclear test. Seoul brushed off a threat of retaliation by Pyongyang to ban the entry of North Koreans linked to nuclear and other weapons programmes, saying it would faithfully fulfil its duties as a UN member. Lee Jong-Seok, head of the ministry responsible for inter-Korean relations, said existing laws would allow the government to control or prevent entry by anyone the UN sanctions committee names as subject to travel restrictions. He said Seoul was also tightening inspection of goods and materials shipped to North Korea, under the terms of the UN Security Council resolution imposed after Pyongyang's October 9 first ever atom bomb test. "Once the sanctions committee designates persons or organizations (with links to WMD programmes), the government will control the country's trade, investment, financial payments and fund remittances" to those entities, Lee said. The move came as visiting French President Jacques Chirac" /> President Jacques Chiracand President Hu Jintao" /> Hu Jintaoof China, Pyongyang's closest ally, voiced "grave concern" at the test in a joint statement in Beijing. "This is contrary to the goal of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and the efforts of the international community to strengthen the non-proliferation regime," they said. Meanwhile a leading think-tank reported a growing crisis of hunger that it said was being overshadowed by the dispute over Pyongyang's weapons drive. The International Crisis Group warned in a report that hunger was driving increasing numbers of North Koreans to risk their lives fleeing over the border to China, and urged Beijing to halt its policy of repatriating the refugees. The humanitarian challenge was "playing out almost invisibly as the world focuses on North Korea's nuclear programme", the Brussels-based group said. The ICG said China and South Korea were not putting maximum pressure on the North to scrap its nuclear programme because they feared a torrent of refugees if the economy collapsed. But it warned that even without the UN sanctions, "the perfect storm may be brewing for a return to famine in the North." The October 9 caused a global uproar with the UN Security Council issuing a resolution imposing economic sanctions aimed at reining in Pyongyang's weapons programme. The North is believed to have secured up to 50 kilograms of plutonium, enough to make six or seven nuclear weapons, according to a South Korean defence ministry report leaked to the media. The report, submitted to a meeting of top military commanders on October 10, a day after North Korea conducted its first nuclear test, said the communist state was now believed to be researching how to miniaturise warheads to fit them on missiles. Separately, US Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill said North Korea had given no indication it would return to stalled six-party talks, one of the key planks of the UN resolution. "The North Koreans haven't expressed an interest in having a dialogue with anyone really," Hill told reporters on the sidelines of a regional meeting in Fiji. "We've made very clear that if they come back to the (six-party) process, we're certainly prepared to talk to them directly," he said, when asked about calls for Washington to engage in direct dialogue with Kim Jong-Il's regime. North Korea pulled out of the six-nation talks in November last year in protest at financial sanctions imposed by Washington against Pyongyang for alleged money-laundering and counterfeiting. Japan, meanwhile, said it would not lift its own sanctions on North Korea until the communist state clearly abandoned its nuclear programme. Simply returning to multi-party negotiations was only a "starting point," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki, the government spokesman. North Korea "has to halt the nuclear development programmes in an evident way and respond to the voices of the international community over issues such as abductions." Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The ***************************************************************** 30 UPI: South Korea updates North's bomb estimate United Press International - Security &Terrorism - 10/26/2006 1:03:00 PM -0400 SEOUL, Oct. 26 (UPI) -- North Korea possesses enough weapons-grade plutonium to build as many as seven nuclear bombs, according to updated South Korean military estimates. The report by the Defense Ministry, disclosed by an opposition lawmaker, also said Pyongyang was trying to make warheads smaller in size to fit on missiles for delivery. According to The Korea Herald Thursday, the assessment is a result of a meeting between South Korean government and military officials in the aftermath of a North Korean nuclear test earlier this month. South Korea previously believed the North had about 40 kilograms (88 pounds) of weapons-grade plutonium obtained through its nuclear enrichment programs in the 1990s. It is now believed it has 50 kilograms (110 pounds) of weapons-grade material, the newspaper said. Military officials were said to have told Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung that a 20-kiloton weapon hitting the Seoul area would result in 1.2 million casualties outright. Also, radiological contamination would spread 28 miles from Ground Zero within 24 hours. North Korea signed an agreement with the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton in the early 1990s to stop producing weapons-grade nuclear materials, but promptly reneged on it. International efforts to induce Pyongyang to stop its activities have so far failed. Earlier this month it exploded a small nuclear device. In July it test-fired a number of missiles capable of carrying miniaturized nuclear warheads. The Korea Herald said the military report said North Korea has a bomber fleet of 82 planes deployed in the areas of Uiju and Jangjin. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 31 Guardian Unlimited: Tokyo Denies Report It Wants Nuke Meet | From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 3:16 AM AP Photo DCLJ104 By HANS GREIMEL Associated Press Writer TOKYO (AP) - Japan's foreign ministry Thursday denied a news report that the government is planning a meeting with the U.S. and South Korea as early as next month to solidify a common stance on the North Korean nuclear standoff. The report comes amid growing concerns that South Korea has been hesitant to join the United States and Japan in punishing North Korea for conducting its first-ever nuclear test earlier this month. Kyodo News agency, citing unidentified government officials, said the meeting among the allies will likely be held in Seoul, the South Korean capital, and include the nations' chief delegates on the North Korean nuclear crisis. The goal is to lay the groundwork for working-level meetings with the three and Russia and China, on the sidelines of November's Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum in Vietnam, Kyodo said. Japan wants the trilateral meeting to reaffirm the demand that the North Korean nuclear crisis be resolved through six-party talks that include North Korea, South Korea, the United States, Japan, China and Russia, according to the report. A Foreign Ministry spokeswoman denied the report. She spoke on condition of anonymity, citing ministry protocol. North Korea has rejected the six-party format, saying it first wants the United States to lift financial restrictions imposed against the country. It has also been pushing for direct bilateral talks with Washington, a demand the United States has refused. On Wednesday, South Korea said it formed a task force to look at how to impose U.N. sanctions on North Korea for its nuclear test, while the communist nation warned it would take countermeasures against any such move by the South. The U.N. Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution sanctioning the North for its Oct. 9 nuclear test, but South Korea - a major aid provider to the impoverished North - has been reluctant to adopt stern measures against its volatile neighbor. The U.N. resolution calls for all member countries to state how they plan to implement sanctions on the North within 30 days from its Oct. 14 adoption. Later Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice gently prodded Seoul to show a strong commitment to the sanctions. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 32 Guardian Unlimited: S. Korea: North Can Make 7 Nuclear Bombs From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 9:31 AM AP Photo SEL101 SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - South Korea estimates North Korea has enough plutonium to make as many as seven nuclear bombs, according to a Defense Ministry report disclosed Thursday. The communist nation is also working to make a small, lightweight nuclear warhead that can be mounted atop a ballistic missile, the ministry said in the internal assessment made public by Song Young-sun, a lawmaker from the main opposition Grand National Party. The assessment is based on a meeting of top South Korean military officials a day after the North's Oct. 9 nuclear test. The report says the North is believed to have extracted 110 pounds of high-grade plutonium, enough for up to seven nuclear weapons. The North can use its Russian-made bombers to drop the bombs, the ministry said, adding that the North has 82 Il-28 bombers at bases in Uiju and Jangjin. North Korea also has built a nuclear warhead weighing some two to three tons. To be mounted on a missile, the warhead would need to be less than one ton, the ministry said. The North stunned the world in 1998 by firing a long-range ballistic missile over Japan into the Pacific Ocean. It also test-fired seven missiles in July, including a long-range missile believed capable of reaching the U.S. that crashed shortly after launch. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** 33 RIA Novosti: Ex-nuclear head will not ask court for dismissal of his case 26/ 10/ 2006 MOSCOW, October 26 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's ex-nuclear power minister, charged with embezzlement and abuse of office, said Thursday he will not ask the court to close his case because the statute of limitation has expired. Yevgeny Adamov, 67, has been accused of leading an organized criminal group that inflicted damage worth over 3 billion rubles (about $110 million) on the Russian budget, enterprises and organizations. "I will not use the expiration of the statute of limitations [to ask for a dismissal], because it would imply an indirect admission of guilt," Adamov told journalists in the Zamoskvoretsky District Court, where the retrial of his case was to start Thursday, but has been delayed until November 8. "The hearings have been adjourned because Adamov's lawyers have not appeared in court, and one of the defendants has been hospitalized," a source in the courtroom said. Adamov was originally arrested in Switzerland in May 2005 at the request of the United States, where authorities accuse him of misappropriating $9 million given to Russia for nuclear safety projects. If convicted in the U.S., Adamov would have faced 60 years in prison. He was extradited to Russia in early 2006 to face charges, but was released by the Russian Supreme Court July 21, after a total of 15 months in prison, to await trial. Adamov, who served from 1998 to 2001 as Russia's nuclear power minister, said he will insist on a trial in a U.S. court, although the U.S. authorities have accused him of a crime they said was committed in Russia. "It is surprising that Russia's jurisdiction has been transferred to another state," Adamov said. "I think proceedings in the U.S. will be adjourned until the process is completed here [in Russia]." On October 16, the Moscow City Court canceled the Zamoskvoretsky District Court's decision to send Adamov's case back to the Prosecutor General's Office to correct shortcomings in the investigation and clarify the charges. The city court thereby upheld an appeal by prosecutors against the district court decision. Prosecutors demanded that the case should instead be sent for retrial in the district court. © 2005 RIA Novosti ***************************************************************** 34 AFP: Billion-dollar contracts signed as French, Chinese leaders meet by Emmanuel Serot Thu Oct 26, 8:03 AM ET BEIJING (AFP) - The leaders of France and China oversaw the signing of multi-billion-dollar business deals at talks that touched on nuclear crises in North Korea" /> North Koreaand Iran" /> Iranand an EU arms embargo on Beijing. French President Jacques Chirac" /> President Jacques Chirac, on the second, politically most important day of a four-day visit to China, met Thursday with his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao" /> Hu Jintaofor over an hour at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. Chirac, on his fourth visit since taking power in 1995 -- he leaves office next year -- is regarded as an old friend by the Chinese leadership, and his presence triggered another round of lucrative economic contracts. "We have met to strengthen our economic and commercial cooperation, notably in the areas of energy, aviation, space and transportation," Hu said after the talks, which he described as "frank, friendly and fruitful." Chirac described his visit as the start of an even stronger phase in Sino-French relations. "In our long history, our relationship has never been so close and trustful and this visit will enhance our strategic partnership," Chirac said. The two leaders issued a joint statement calling for the European Union" /> European Union's arms embargo, in place since the Tiananmen massacre of 1989, to be lifted. "The two sides believe that the moment has come for the EU to make the most of the expanding partnership between the EU and China, most notably by lifting the arms embargo," the statement said. It also called on the bloc to recognize "as soon as possible China's market economy status." Headlining the deals was China's multi-billion-dollar order of 150 Airbus A320 aircraft, along with an option to buy 20 of the European aerospace giant's new wide-body A350 planes. While no figures were released about the value of the contract, Airbus officials said the average list price for one A320 was between 50.5 million and 78 million dollars. China placed another order in December last year, when Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao visited France, for 150 Airbus planes with a list price of nearly 10 billion dollars. As part of Thursday's deal, Airbus gave a final green light to the building of an A320 assembly plant in the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin -- the first of its kind outside Europe. The new plant, first officially floated during Wen's visit to France, will complete its first aircraft in 2009 and will subsequently manufacture four a month, the aircraft maker said. Thirteen economic and other cooperation agreements were signed between the two nations on areas as diverse as nuclear power, agriculture and preventing infectious diseases, as well as aviation and rail. Aside from bilateral economic cooperation, Chirac and Hu devoted part of their meeting to discussing international stand-offs over the North Korean and Iranian nuclear programs. The joint statement expressed "grave concern" over North Korea's October 9 first ever nuclear bomb test, which it said was "contrary to the goal of the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula." The leaders also urged Tehran to abide by a UN Security Council resolution that had set an August 31 deadline for Iran to abandon sensitive nuclear fuel work or face sanctions. The meeting between Hu and Chirac was watched closely in relation to North Korea and Iran as China and France are permanent members of the UN Security Council. Human rights, a highly sensitive issue for China's leaders, was also discussed after Chirac made rare comments a day earlier highlighting Beijing's poor record in the area. "It is a due necessity of nations to advance and protect all human rights and fundamental liberties," the joint statement from Hu and Chirac said. Chirac had on Wednesday singled out China's attitude on human rights as a particular area of concern as the country's leaders look ahead to hosting the 2008 Olympics. The French leader later Thursday spoke to students at Peking University and met with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. He will travel to Wuhan in central China on Friday to oversee the start of construction of a second PSA Peugeot-Citroen factory. The final leg of Chirac's visit on Saturday will be to the archaeologically rich city of Xian. Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 35 Xinhua: China, France ink joint statement, 14 cooperation agreements www.chinaview.cn 2006-10-26 13:01:53 Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) shakes hands with visiting French President Jacques Chirac during a signing ceremony in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. (Xinhua Photo) Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) holds talks with visiting French President Jacques Chirac in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. (Xinhua Photo) BEIJING, Oct. 26 (Xinhua) -- China and France on Thursday signed a joint statement and 14 cooperation agreements ranging from aviation, nuclear power utilization to prevention of infectious diseases. Chinese President Hu Jintao and visiting French President Jacques Chirac both agreed that Sino-French relationship has become "an example" for friendly cooperation among countries with different historical backgrounds, cultural traditions and development stages. Chirac, who arrived here on Wednesday afternoon on a four-day state visit, held talks with Hu for two hours in the Great Hall of the People before witnessing the signing of a series of agreements, including an over arching document titled the Sino-French Joint Statement. The 14 agreements, include a framework agreement and a letter of intent for 150 Airbus A320 aircraft and a contract worth 1.2 billion euros (1.5 billion dollars) for the delivery of 500 freight locomotives from Alstom SA of France to China. The multi-billion-dollar arrangement represents the largest deal in the history of the Chinese aviation industry. Acknowledging the bilateral economic and trade cooperation progressed rapidly with trade volume being quadrupled in ten years, the two presidents expressed their satisfaction with bilateral relations that are unprecedentedly close and full of trust. The two sides decided in the joint statement to expand the strategic exchange and cooperation to seven key fields which are energy, aerospace and aviation, railway, telecommunication, financial service, agriculture, food processing and environmental protection. According to the statement, China and France decide to forge closer cooperation on the nuclear power utilization which includes the establishment of the joint ventures in the agreed fields concerning the nuclear power generation. The two leaders are also satisfied with the increasing exchanges between Chinese and French businesses, especially those among the small and medium-sized enterprises (SME), promising to continue to boost the exchanges between the two businesses, especially those among the SMEs. Accompanying Chirac is a 30-member French business delegation keen to boost economic and trade ties between the two countries in key fields such as aeronautics, nuclear energy, railway transportation, telecommunications and financial services. This is Chirac's fourth and probably the last visit to China as French president as his presidency will come to an end in 2007. He is widely regarded as a friendly policy-maker and active promoter of ties with China. In the statement, the two leaders also expressed serious concern in the joint statement over the nuclear test announced by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) on Oct. 9, saying the test goes against the goal of denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, as well as efforts of the international community to strengthen international non-proliferation. The statement said that the two countries support the Security Council Resolution 1718, and urge the DPRK to abide by its commitment to denuclearization of the peninsula. The two sides hope all parties will stick to peaceful resolution of the nuclear issue through dialogue and consultation, and strive for an early resumption of the six-party talks, the joint statement said. China and France also urged the European Union (EU) in the statement to lift its arms embargo against China that has been in place since 1989 and grant China market economy status. "The two sides believe that the European Union should take the EU-China expanding partnership into full consideration, most notably by lifting the arms embargo which is no longer pertinent to the present situation," said the statement. The two leaders vowed to continue their efforts to deepen the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and the European Union, according to the joint statement. They also agreed that, in order to solve the problems that have emerged in the China-EU trade relations, both China and the European Union should conduct dialogue and negotiations based on an equal footing and in accordance with WTO regulations. China, France vow to step up partnership BEIJING, Oct. 26 (Xinhua) -- China and France vowed here Thursday to step up bilateral cooperation in various fields and promote their all-round strategic partnership. In talks with his visiting French counterpart Jacques Chirac, Chinese President Hu Jintao said that the last few years had witnessed a series of successful bilateral exchanges that had built political mutual trust and understanding. Hu and Chirac expressed their appreciation of the progress made in bilateral relations, and said that the all-round strategic partnership had opened broad prospects for Sino-French relations in the new century. They agreed to push forward the bilateral partnership. Full story Premier Wen: Sino-French relations, a tree full of life [Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (R) meets with French President Jacques Chirac in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. ] Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (R) meets with French President Jacques Chirac in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. (Xinhua Photo) BEIJING, Oct. 26 (Xinhua) -- The Bilateral relations between China and France are growing well, like a tree full of life, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said here Thursday when meeting visiting French President Jacques Chirac. Wen acknowledged that France was the first Western country to forge diplomatic relations at ambassadorial level with China, and the first in the world to establish an all-round strategic partnership, hold strategic dialogue and host reciprocal culture years with China. "These are proofs of the French leader's foresight and sagacity", Wen noted. Wen said China and France have complementary economies with a huge potential for cooperation, saying that China will promote cooperation in the fields of nuclear energy, aerospace and aviation, railways, financial service and environmental protection. Full story French President Jacques Chirac delivers a speech at Peking University in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. (Xinhua Photo) French President Jacques Chirac (front) leaves Peking University after delivering a speech here in Beijing, Oct. 26, 2006. (Xinhua Photo) China, France to strengthen UNSC co-op ***************************************************************** 36 UPI: Analysis: Israel assesses NATO ties United Press International - Intl. Intelligence - 10/26/2006 7:44:00 AM -0400 By JOSHUA BRILLIANT UPI Israel Correspondent HERZLIYA, Israel, Oct. 26 (UPI) -- Slowly and without much fanfare Israel is tightening its cooperation with NATO. An Israeli corvette this summer participated in a NATO exercise in Romania. Infantrymen joined war games in the Ukraine and a NATO AWACS plane was in Israel demonstrating its capabilities. It is a gradual change. Israel used to consider itself an island surrounded by enemies, a realization of a Biblical prophecy that it is "A nation that will dwell in solitude." It wasn't quite so. Russia, via Czechoslovakia, provided weapons during the first Arab-Israel war. France armed Israel later on, and the United States airlifted vital aid during and since the 1973 war. These have all been bilateral ties, and with Russia and France they ended abruptly. Israelis have always thought in bilateral terms but that is changing. The notion that "a rogue state" like Iran that openly hopes Israel would be liquidated, would have a nuclear bomb is troubling. It heightened Israel's realization that it needs partners to stop Iran, a country 82 times bigger than Israel whose population is 10 times that of theirs. "Failed states" that allow terror to mushroom are another source of concern. It's not Somalia. It's Lebanon that did not prevent -- let alone try to -- Hezbollah from crossing the border, kidnapping Israeli soldiers, shelling settlements and thereby provoking a war the government did not want. Here, too, Israel discovered the advantages of multilateralism. Following the war UNIFIL is being enlarged from a modest force of some 2,000 soldiers to 15,000. Eleven countries are contributing troops to UNIFIL. Six of them are NATO members. Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni Tuesday addressed the opening session of a conference that NATO, the Israeli Atlantic Forum and the Institute for Policy and Strategy held in Herzliya. "Israel's traditional long-term policy has been one of self-reliance," she said. However, "the current threats necessitate international cooperation and multilateralism." NATO is "most essential" to meet these strategic threats because it has a just value system, a special ability to rapidly adapt to current strategic threats, and a unique approach that combines diplomacy with the use of military force when necessary, she said. NATO, too, is changing. Al-Qaida's Sept. 11 attacks in the United States demonstrated that the major threat and challenges come from outside Europe, that terrorism is globalized, noted Patrick Hardouin, a deputy assistant secretary-general at NATO's Political Affairs and Security Policy Division. NATO decided to upgrade its dialogue with Mediterranean states. It launched Operation Active Endeavor in which its ships, submarines and aircraft carry out naval anti-terrorist patrols. Israel contributes to Active Endeavor. It will post an officer at NATO's headquarters in Naples to help with intelligence gathering so that the units at sea can be more effective. The Karin A, which tried to smuggle arms to the Palestinians, was an innocent-looking vessel, noted Capt. Yair Zilberman, who heads the Israel Navy's Planning and Strategy Department. Israel has been one of the "most enthusiastic" partners in the Mediterranean Dialogue which includes Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. These are countries with which Israel has no, or partial, diplomatic ties. Recently, Israel became the first country to conclude an Individual Cooperation Program with NATO. It covers 27 areas, including the fight against terrorism and joint military exercises, and goes beyond cooperation through the Mediterranean Dialogue. The Israelis seemed very eager to upgrade relations, and the Defense Ministry's Coordinator for NATO and European Defense Organizations, Uri Naaman, complained of "some obstacles we didn't expect." Israeli officials said these were minor technical issues and a NATO spokesman, Nicola de Santis, suggested Israel be patient. The ICP agreement was just concluded, the agenda is far reaching and "to discuss the results before even implementing it is a bit too much," he told United Press International. Anyway, Israel itself hasn't decided how far it wants to go with NATO. Livni advocated "a system of cooperation," and a senior official sought the kind of relationship NATO has with Finland and Sweden. It allows for 2,000 joint activities -- thrice the volume open to the countries involved in the Mediterranean Dialogue, he told UPI. It is a high level of coordination without membership, noted retired intelligence Col. Eran Lerman. Israelis realize their country cannot join NATO before it concludes peace with the Arabs. Some NATO members would oppose its candidacy. Israelis are not sure their country should become a full member. Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty provides that an attack on one member would be considered an attack on all. Lerman said that article might restrict Israel's freedom to retaliate, initiate military action and would reduce its independent deterrence. There are so many other possibilities that would serve Israel's and NATO's interests, he suggested. For Israel's chief representative at NATO headquarters, Ambassador Odded Eran, the important thing was to have "a multilateral umbrella. ... We don't necessarily need article 5. The very fact we're members of such an organization gives ... a sort of guarantee," he said. The Foreign Ministry's former Director General Yoav Biran seemed to put things in perspective. The Mediterranean Dialogue is "of tremendous political psychological importance to Israel because of our paranoia" over security. The direct cooperation with NATO has tremendous potential importance, but its practical scope "is limited because of NATO political sensitivities," he said. Perhaps Israel should take "a more relaxed attitude in trying to pursue this cooperation," he suggested. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 37 UPI: Walker's World: Chirac's Chinese detour United Press International - Intl. Intelligence - 10/26/2006 11:31:00 AM -0400 By MARTIN WALKER UPI Editor Emeritus WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 (UPI) -- President Jacques Chirac may be a lame duck as France's political classes prepare for the battle to succeed him in next year's elections, but he retains a clever sense of timing. His trip to China was planned to keep him out of the country for the anniversary of the riots that swept across France last year. Predictably enough, trouble has broken out again, but this time instead of setting fire to over 10,000 cars, which was last year's tally, the rioters have been targeting buses. Four were attacked over Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, two by armed gangs, who ordered the drivers and passengers out before setting fire to the vehicles. Drivers on one of the main Paris bus routes have now gone on strike, and the RATP urban transit authority is planning new routes to avoid "les zones sensibles," or sensitive areas, which means in effect stopping public transport from serving the grim suburbs where black and North African immigrants are concentrated. Nothing much has changed in these quarters since the immigrant youth launched what some of them called "our intifada" a year ago. The French police thought in similar terms. Interviews in le Figaro this week, police commissioner Frederic Aureal said that many of his officers "believed they were facing urban guerilla war" in last year's riots. Unemployment remains desperately high, even though the French economy has shown a modest recovery with the jobless totals falling into single figures --but not for the young. And the latest drop in French consumer purchases, announced this week, suggests that the economy looks like sagging back into recession. Despite more police and a strengthened CRS (specialist riot police), France is living on its nerves as it faces the challenge of the highest proportion of immigrants in Europe. The best estimates suggest that some five million North African Muslims and another two million blacks, many of them also Muslim, now account for over ten percent of the country's population of 60 million. The proportion is much higher among the young, thanks to an elevated birth rates among immigrants, who number over a quarter of France's population under the age of 25. Some cosmetic measures have been taken. France now has a black news reader on the main TV channel. The schools and maternity and community centers that were burned out in last year's riots have been replaced. There is a new program that is meant to stop employers from discriminating against young immigrants making job applications, who have found that their names or addresses, their accents over the phone or their appearance when they turn up for interview, usually sinks their chances of being hired. Amid promises to ensure that "no zones of lawlessness will be permitted in France," Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin claimed Tuesday that government job creation measures had created 4,000 new jobs in "les zones sensibles." But the conditions that bred lawlessness could not be resolved in a day, he went on, stressing that the government had earmarked a massive 35 billion euros, $42 billion, for rebuilding and renovation of the sullen and ugly high-rise zones over the next eight years. The problem is that most of this money was scheduled to be spent anyway, just as the Chinese orders for 150 new Airbuses that President Chirac announced with fanfare in China Tuesday were already known. And the Airbus employees are less than happy that the Chinese deal means a great deal of technology sharing with China's fast-growing new aircraft industry, which will assemble the new Airbus fleet in a new factory at Tianjin, the first such Airbus plant outside Europe. "If you want to implant yourself in China commercially, you must also implant yourself industrially," said Airbus CEO Louis Gallois, who carefully declined to say who would finance the new factory. The European Union, which has overtaken the United States as China's biggest export market, had a massive $133 billion trade deficit with China last year. Although the televised signing ceremony was held in Beijing's Great Hall of the People, neither the name of the purchaser of this Airbus fleet nor the contract price has been released. On paper the deal, which also includes an option for China to buy 20 much larger Airbus 350 passenger jets, should be worth of $10 billion at the Airbus list price. But China's business press is reporting that they drove a hard bargain and won a sizeable discount. The Airbus 350, supposed to challenge Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner, may not even be built. A firm decision has yet to be taken, after the bruising controversies that have battered Airbus and its EADS Franco-German parent in recent months. There has been an extraordinary write-off of over $5 billion because of construction delays hitting the giant Airbus jumbo jet, top-level resignations and a row between France and Germany over the future structure of the joint company. The French government, understandably, is spinning the news to put the Airbus deals, and the slum reconstruction programs, into the best light. More spinning may be expected from Chirac's attempt to sign a further deal in China over nuclear power contracts. Although France was China's first supplier of modern nuclear power technology, and France's Framatome built China's first new power stations at Daya Bay in the 1990s, China has since demanded technology transfer from Russian, Japanese and French suppliers and is now determined to design and construct its own new plants. The government's attempt to spin the news has aroused considerable cynicism in France, as it has in the United States, Britain and elsewhere, once voters start to suspect they are being misled. And this cynicism was in marked contrast to the genuinely touching scene in Paris Tuesday, where hundreds of young black and Arab demonstrators marched through Paris to present a petition of grievances to the National Assembly, and then sang the Marseillaise and shouted "Vive la France." Marching past ranks of riot police in body armor, the young marchers proclaimed their allegiance to a country which has not made them feel at home. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 38 Guardian Unlimited: Time running out fast for oldest nuclear plants, warn inspectors John Vidal, environment editor Thursday October 26, 2006 The Guardian The future of some of Britain's ageing nuclear power stations was yesterday thrown into doubt as government inspectors claimed cracks in the graphite cores of the oldest plants were so serious that a safety case for the stations operating much longer could not be made. An assessment report on the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate website stated yesterday that there were expectations that most of the graphite bricks in the core of the 1976 Hinkley Point station, and its twin station, Hunterston, in Ayrshire, would crack in the near future, jeopardising the safe running of the reactors. "British Energy predict that during the period covered [by the safety review] the majority of fuel moderator bricks will develop a single through-thickness crack from a keyway root," the report says. "Some of these may develop a second keyway root crack such that the brick may be in halves ... therefore brick cracking could affect channel straightness and the ability of the graphite core to meet its fundamental nuclear safety requirements." It adds that the safety review "recognises that core lifetime is probably the dominant station life-limiting feature and that it is currently not possible to make a safety case for the graphite core to ...]". The date has been deleted. The problem of the deteriorating graphite cores follows last week's disclosure by British Energy that it had encountered serious cracking problems in the boiler tubes at Hinkley. While the company declined to give a date on how long it would take to fix them, that period is thought to be at least six months. Both stations have been closed indefinitely. According to John Large, an independent nuclear analyst, the combination of the graphite core and the boiler tube problems means it may not be economic or safe for British Energy to reopen the four reactors at the two stations. The company and the government are counting on both being granted 10-year extensions to their 30-year life-times. Together the plants provide 6% of Britain's electricity at a time when demand is rising and when no new large-scale stations are expected to open soon. The stations' closure is expected to seriously affect British Energy's income and electricity supplies this winter. Together the stations earn 25% of British Energy's income, roughly £2m a week. Last week the company said that only one of its eight nuclear power stations was operating fully, and its share price fell dramatically. Yesterday, four of its eight stations were working. "The old stations are the base load of the nuclear electricity system in Britain. It is very serious indeed for Britain's future electricity supplies and the company's survival," said Dr Large. British Energy yesterday said there was no doubt that both stations would reopen, but declined to estimate when or to say when their safety operating licences would expire. "We are investigating the graphite core problem. It is a known-about phenomenon in old stations. The boiler tube problem is purely an engineering problem ... the problems are entirely solvable. This is not life-limiting." In a separate development, the government yesterday announced that it was looking for a site for a deep bunker to store Britain's mountain of high-level nuclear waste. The environment secretary, David Miliband, said he had accepted the recommendation of the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management that the waste from Britain's nuclear reactors be buried in a deep repository. In a Commons statement, he said the government would not impose the repository on an unwilling community, but held out the inducement of lucrative "community packages" for councils prepared to offer a suitable location. The new 470,000-cubic-metre bunker, which would take "several decades" to build, will be sunk from 200 metres to 1,000 metres underground. It is widely expected to be sited near Sellafield in Cumbria. Mr Miliband also said the government intended to build interim storage facilities to hold waste for up to 100 years while the bunker was being built. Guardian Newspapers Limited ***************************************************************** 39 Times of India: The world has failed on N-tech transfer - Rahul [ 26 Oct, 2006 1124hrs ISTIANS ] UNITED NATIONS: India seeks a fresh assessment of nuclear energy as a clean and safe source of energy to give developing countries the freedom to choose policies that best suit their energy needs, Indian delegate Rahul Gandhi said here. "Developing countries must have the policy space to address their energy needs in light of their individual circumstances," Gandhi said, participating in a UN committee debate on Sustainable Development on Wednesday. All significant energy sources - whether conventional or advanced fossil fuels based, or renewable, or civilian nuclear power - must remain in policy reckoning to address energy needs for sustainable development, he said, "In particular, there needs to be a fresh assessment of nuclear energy, as a clean and safe source of energy." Many developing countries, including India, still rely on traditional sources of energy for a significant part of their energy needs. However, traditional technologies are inefficient, insufficiently versatile and have major health, gender, and environmental impacts, Gandhi said. "Energy is critical to development. In developing countries, a rapid increase in energy use per capita is imperative to realising national development goals and Millennium Development Goals," he said. Noting that at the Johannesburg Summit, the international community had collectively agreed to significantly reduce the current loss of biological diversity by 2010, Gandhi stressed the importance of an international regime to protect and safeguard the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. The international community has not lived up to its commitments for technology transfer he said putting critical technologies beyond the reach of developing countries because of prohibitive costs under the existing Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime. "We need to revisit the IPRs regime to ensure that technologies necessary for pursuing the global imperative of sustainable development are placed in the limited public domain and made accessible to developing countries," Gandhi said asserting that these regimes must represent the tradeoffs between innovator incentives and wider human societal imperatives. The international community should also explore the possibility of establishing a Clean Technology Acquisition Fund to enable developing countries to access critical technologies, he said as it would encourage the use of clean technologies, and significantly impact the realisation of sustainable development goals. As a result of globalisation, external factors contribute to the success or failure of developing countries to a greater extent than before, Gandhi said noting that developing countries are caught between intellectual property rights and trade regimes, as well as the conditionalities imposed by the World Bank and IMF, all of which erode their autonomy and flexibility. However, these countries need that autonomy and flexibility to evolve policies and strategies for economic growth and sustainable development, which is so critical to eradicating poverty and achieving Millennium Development Goals, he said. Expressing concern at the current impasse in the Doha round of trade negotiations, Gandhi noted that when agriculture was brought into multilateral trade negotiations, developing countries had clearly been given to understand that trade distorting agriculture subsidies would be phased out in a definite timeframe. However, gains expected from agricultural reform by developed countries continue to elude developing countries, he said. "Minimizing the vulnerability of poor farmers must be our collective priority. Reducing agricultural tariffs and subsidies is not enough: there must be exceptions to allow developing countries more space to pursue their pro-development strategies and policies aimed at protecting their poor," Gandhi said. Special and differential treatment for developing countries, to enable them to meet food security, livelihood security and rural development needs, remains a categorical imperative, he said. Copyright ©2006Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. For ***************************************************************** 40 Telugu Portal: India seeks review of nuclear energy policies - Posted by on 2006/10/26 2:28:08 United Nations, Oct 26 (IANS) India seeks a fresh assessment of nuclear energy as a clean and safe source of energy to give developing countries the freedom to choose policies that best suit their energy needs, Indian delegate Rahul Gandhi said here. "Developing countries must have the policy space to address their energy needs in light of their individual circumstances," Gandhi said participating in a UN committee debate on Sustainable Development Wednesday. All significant energy sources - whether conventional or advanced fossil fuels based, or renewables, or civilian nuclear power - must remain in policy reckoning to address energy needs for sustainable development, he said, "In particular, there needs to be a fresh assessment of nuclear energy, as a clean and safe source of energy." Many developing countries, including India, still rely on traditional sources of energy for a significant part of their energy needs. However, traditional technologies are inefficient, insufficiently versatile and have major health, gender, and environmental impacts, Gandhi said. "Energy is critical to development. In developing countries, a rapid increase in energy use per capita is imperative to realising national development goals and Millennium Development Goals," he said. Noting that at the Johannesburg Summit, the international community had collectively agreed to significantly reduce the current loss of biological diversity by 2010, Gandhi stressed the importance of an international regime to protect and safeguard the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources and traditional knowledge. The international community has not lived up to its commitments for technology transfer he said putting critical technologies beyond the reach of developing countries because of prohibitive costs under the existing Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime. "We need to revisit the IPRs regime to ensure that technologies necessary for pursuing the global imperative of sustainable development are placed in the limited public domain and made accessible to developing countries," Gandhi said asserting that these regimes must represent the tradeoffs between innovator incentives and wider human societal imperatives. The international community should also explore the possibility of establishing a Clean Technology Acquisition Fund to enable developing countries to access critical technologies, he said as it would encourage the use of clean technologies, and significantly impact the realisation of sustainable development goals. As a result of globalisation, external factors contribute to the success or failure of developing countries to a greater extent than before, Gandhi said noting that developing countries are caught between intellectual property rights and trade regimes, as well as the conditionalities imposed by the World Bank and IMF, all of which erode their autonomy and flexibility. However, these countries need that autonomy and flexibility to evolve policies and strategies for economic growth and sustainable development, which is so critical to eradicating poverty and achieving Millennium Development Goals, he said. Expressing concern at the current impasse in the Doha round of trade negotiations, Gandhi noted that when agriculture was brought into multilateral trade negotiations, developing countries had clearly been given to understand that trade distorting agriculture subsidies would be phased out in a definite timeframe. However, gains expected from agricultural reform by developed countries continue to elude developing countries, he said. "Minimizing the vulnerability of poor farmers must be our collective priority. Reducing agricultural tariffs and subsidies is not enough: there must be exceptions to allow developing countries more space to pursue their pro-development strategies and policies aimed at protecting their poor," Gandhi said. Special and differential treatment for developing countries, to enable them to meet food security, livelihood security and rural development needs, remains a categorical imperative, he said. © 2006 TeluguPortal.Net | | | | ***************************************************************** 41 NRC: Nuclear Management Company, LLC; Palisades Plant Exemption FR Doc E6-17937 [Federal Register: October 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 207)] [Notices] [Page 62628-62630] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr26oc06-72] 1.0 Background Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC), is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-20, which authorizes operation of the Palisades Nuclear Plant (Palisades). The license provides, among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear [[Page 62629]] Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect. The facility consists of a pressurized-water reactor located in VanBuren County, Michigan. 2.0 Request/Action Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), part 50.46, ``Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light- water nuclear power reactors,'' requires that the calculated emergency core cooling system (ECCS) performance for reactors with zircaloy or ZIRLO fuel cladding meet certain criteria. Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50, ``ECCS Evaluation Models,'' presumes the use of zircaloy or ZIRLO fuel cladding when doing calculations for energy release, cladding oxidation, and hydrogen generation after a postulated loss-of-coolant accident. Framatome ANP developed M5 advanced fuel rod cladding and fuel assembly structural material for high-burnup fuel applications. M5 is an alloy comprised primarily of zirconium (~99 percent) and niobium (~1 percent). The NRC staff approved the use of M5 material in topical report BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, ``Evaluation of Advanced Cladding and Structural Material (M5) in PWR Reactor Fuel,'' dated June 18, 2003. The M5 cladding is a proprietary, zirconium-based alloy that is chemically different from zircaloy or ZIRLO cladding materials, which are approved for use in the previously-mentioned NRC regulations. Therefore, a plant-specific exemption from these regulations is necessary to allow the use of M5 cladding. Accordingly, NMC's application of October 4, 2005, as supplemented June 14, 2006, requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50 to allow the use of M5 fuel cladding at Palisades. 3.0 Discussion Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50.46 and Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50 when (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and (2) when special circumstances are present. Authorized by Law This exemption would allow the use of M5 advanced alloy, in lieu of zircaloy or ZIRLO, for fuel rod cladding in fuel assemblies at Palisades. As stated above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 50.46 and Appendix K to 10 CFR part 50. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law. No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety The staff has previously reviewed exemption requests for use of the M5 advanced alloy material for other pressurized-water reactors. Exemptions from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix K, have been issued at Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant and Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1. In the approved topical report BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, ``Evaluation of Advanced Cladding and Structural Material (M5) in PWR Reactor Fuel,'' dated June 18, 2003, Framatome ANP demonstrated that the effectiveness of the ECCS will not be affected by a change from zircaloy fuel rod cladding to M5 fuel rod cladding. The analysis described in the topical report also demonstrated that the ECCS acceptance criteria applied to reactors fueled with zircaloy clad fuel are also applicable to reactors fueled with M5 fuel rod cladding. Appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, of 10 CFR part 50 ensures that cladding oxidation and hydrogen generation are appropriately limited during a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), and conservatively accounted for in the ECCS evaluation model. Appendix K requires that the Baker- Just equation be used in the ECCS evaluation model to determine the rate of energy release, cladding oxidation, and hydrogen generation. In the approved topical report BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, Framatome ANP demonstrated that the Baker-Just model is conservative in all post-LOCA scenarios with respect to the use of the M5 advanced alloy as a fuel rod cladding material, and that the amount of hydrogen generated in an M5-clad core during a LOCA will remain within the Palisades design basis. The NRC staff has reviewed the advanced cladding and structural material, M5, for pressurized-water reactor fuel mechanical designs as described in BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1. In its safety evaluation for this topical report, the NRC staff concluded that, to the extent and limitations specified in the staff's evaluation, the M5 properties and mechanical design methodology are acceptable for referencing in fuel reload licensing applications. Based on the above, no new accident precursors are created by the use of M5 fuel cladding at Palisades; thus, the probability of postulated accidents is not increased. Also, based on the above, the consequences of postulated accidents are not increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to public health and safety. Consistent With Common Defense and Security The proposed exemption would allow the use of M5 advanced alloy for fuel rod cladding in fuel assemblies at Palisades. This change to the plant has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and security is not impacted by this exemption. Special Circumstances Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule, or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR, part 50.46, is to ensure that facilities have adequate acceptance criteria for ECCS. As discussed above, topical report BAW-10227P-A, Revision 1, demonstrated that the effectiveness of the ECCS will not be affected by a change from zircaloy fuel rod cladding to M5 fuel rod cladding. It also demonstrated that the ECCS acceptance criteria applied to reactors fueled with zircaloy clad fuel are applicable to reactors fueled with M5 fuel rod cladding. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR, part 50, Appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, is to ensure that cladding oxidation and hydrogen generation are appropriately limited during a LOCA and conservatively accounted for in the ECCS evaluation model. As mentioned above, topical report BAW- 10227P-A, Revision 1, demonstrated that the Baker-Just model is conservative in all post-LOCA scenarios with respect to the use of the M5 advanced alloy as a fuel rod cladding material, and the staff concludes that the amount of hydrogen generated in an M5-clad core during a LOCA would remain within the Palisades design basis. As previously mentioned, the NRC staff's review of the M5 material for pressurized-water reactor fuel mechanical designs concluded that, to the extent and limitations specified in the staff's evaluation, the M5 properties and mechanical design methodology are acceptable for referencing in fuel reload licensing applications. Therefore, since the underlying purposes of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix K, are achieved, the special circumstances required by these regulations for the granting of an [[Page 62630]] exemption from 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50 exist. 4.0 Conclusion Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants NMC an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, Appendix K, for Palisades. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment (71 FR 58442). This exemption is effective upon issuance. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of October 2006. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Catherine Haney, Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. E6-17937 Filed 10-25-06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 42 Boston Globe: U.S. tries to reassure India over nuclear deal - Boston.com October 26, 2006 NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The United States has reassured India it would try its best to get a landmark nuclear deal approved by a "lame duck" session of Congress next month amid fears the agreement could be slipping away. The assurance was given by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice when she called India's new foreign minister, Pranab Mukherjee, late on Wednesday to congratulate him on being named to the position, an Indian official said on Thursday. "She said the administration was talking to senators and would do its best to get their approval in this session," the official said. The deal, which aims to overturn a three-decade U.S. ban on supply of nuclear fuel and equipment to energy-hungry India, has been stuck in the U.S. Senate after the chamber failed to vote on it in September due to disputes between the Republicans and the Democrats. Congress is due to sit for a "lame duck" session early next month after elections to both chambers. If the Senate does not pass it then, the deal will have to start a long and winding approval process in both chambers from scratch. Although Washington has said the deal, symbolic of the new friendship between the once-estranged democracies, enjoys bipartisan support, analysts are skeptical. They say if the Democrats win control of Congress as expected, they are unlikely to allow the passage of any significant legislation in a "lame duck" session. The deal has been dogged by controversy since it was first agreed in principal between Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in July 2005. The non-proliferation lobby in the United States says it gives away too much to India, which has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and has conducted nuclear tests. Indian communists, the Hindu nationalist opposition party and some nuclear experts have also criticized it, saying Washington was seeking to curb India's nuclear program by imposing restrictions as part of the deal. Anil Kakodkar, head of India's Department of Atomic Energy, who initially opposed the deal but now supports it, said New Delhi would be forced to pursue alternative energy sources that may not be eco-friendly if the deal did not go through. His comments were made in Mumbai on Wednesday to the Press Trust of India.[ /] © Copyright 2006 Reuters. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Reuters or its third-party content providers. Any copying, republication, or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. More: ***************************************************************** 43 Bayshore Broadcasting Corporation: Bruce B plans being reviewed News for Thursday, October 26th, 2006 Written by Ken Hashizume Bruce Power held an environmental assessment workshop Wednesday on its proposed update of nuclear reactors. A small group attended the information session to catch up and provide input on Bruce Power's plan to update its nuclear reactors. Consultant Duncan Moffatt of Golder Associates says the workshop is to explain Bruce Power's plan as part of the environmental assessment. Moffatt says the group is recommending that the reactors have the most up-to-date equipment. Bruce Power President and CEO Duncan Hawthorne says the purpose of the workshop is to get suggestions from the community. Hawthorne says Bruce is considering either refurbishing Bruce B reactors, replacing the reactors, or a combination of both. Municipal officials, business leaders, environmental and health groups were among key stakeholders in attendance. Many wanted to know about the socio-ecomonic impact of the project. The public will be able to view a copy of the project description at their public libraries hopefully by next week. © 2006 Bayshore Broadcasting Corp. All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 44 GRACE Energy Initiative: Is Nuclear Power the Solution to Climate Change & Future Energy Demand? BURLINGTON, Vt., Oct. 25 /PRNewswire/ -- WHY: After decades of decline and near-oblivion, the question of a nuclear power "renaissance" is being brought to the fore as a miracle answer to combat climate change and charge up a new energy regime free from foreign dependence. Few images elicit more impassioned responses than that of a nuclear reactor -- some of horror and others of hope. This pressing debate, now raging in every media medium and outlet, has been universally one-sided. With questions as crucial to the planet as climate change and energy, we cannot afford to let statements go unchallenged. The sharply differing views on the proposed "nuclear renaissance" promises to provide an action-filled exchange of the contentious issues at hand at the annual conference of the Society of Environmental Journalists, a "nonpartisan, non-advocacy membership organization of professional journalists and academics." WHO: Panelists: Peter Bradford, Former NRC Commissioner, Vice-Chair, Board of Directors, Union of Concerned Scientists, Nuclear Energy Advisor, GRACE Energy Initiative; http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/ Patrick Moore, Clean and Safe Energy Coalition (CASE) spokesperson, Chair/Chief Scientist, Greenspirit Strategies; Jim Riccio, Nuclear Policy Analyst, Greenpeace http://www.greenpeace.org/usa Moderator: Judy Fahys, Environment Reporter, The Salt Lake Tribune WHEN: Friday October 27th @ 11:15 AM-12:30 PM WHERE: The Conference of the Society of Environmental Journalists, in Burlington, Vermont Live Web-cast with interactive online polling pre-register one hour ahead of the debate at: http://www.graceenergyinitiative.org/nuclearexpertdebate.php WHAT: GRACE WEBCAST of a panel discussion from the SEJ Conference called -- "Cradle to Grave: New Nukes and Old Radioactive Waste" The promise of greenhouse gas-free electricity has some people predicting a nuclear power Renaissance. The Bush administration is pledging billions of dollars in incentives to fast-track the construction of new nuclear reactors and the reprocessing of waste, yet nuclear terrorism and proliferation of nuclear weapons abetted by nuclear power programs remain chilling threats. These thorny issues have further polarized the debate: some former nuclear opponents support nuclear as the world's best energy solution, while some former regulators have doubts about a revival, and other environmental groups continue to warn of new nuclear risks. The GRACE Energy Initiative will release a new report in advance of the debate called -- "FALSE PROMISES: DEBUNKING NUCLEAR INDUSTRY PROPAGANDA." To get an advance copy of the report, or for more information please, Contact: GRACE Sr. Media Director, Denise Hughes at 212-726-0121, or by cell at 845-401-5300, Denise@gracelinks.org Issuers of news releases and not PR Newswire are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content. Terms and conditions, including restrictions on redistribution, apply. Copyright © 1996-2003 PR Newswire Association LLC. All Rights Reserved. A United Business Media company. ***************************************************************** 45 Public Citizen: Public Citizen Defends Environmental Nonprofit from Texas Energy Company’s Trademark Lawsuit Threat Oct. 24, 2006 Downwinders at Risk Challenges TXUs Use of Trademark Infringement to Stifle Political Free Speech WASHINGTON, D.C.  In a letter sent today to TXU Corp., Public Citizen defended the free speech rights of a Texas environmental nonprofit organization against trademark infringement lawsuit threats by the energy giant. TXU objected to the group Downwinders at Risks use of the TXU logo, along with the logos of other pollution-causing corporations, on a float depicting Gov. Rick Perry kissing a dirty smokestack. The float was part of a protest to represent the close political and financial relationship between the governors office and the energy industry. TXU threatened to sue the organization for trademark infringement and dilution unless it removes the logo from its float and any published materials. To prove trademark infringement, companies must show that use of their logo was commercial in nature and caused consumer confusion. In this case, the logo was part of a political protest by a nonprofit organization not involved in commercial activities and clearly not affiliated with the company it criticized. TXUs claim that this grassroots group must ask the company for permission to depict and criticize it is patently absurd, said Paul Levy, an attorney for Public Citizen defending Downwinders at Risk. The companys real motive is to use the threat of costly and intimidating lawsuits to stifle the political participation and free speech of citizens who are legitimately concerned about the effects of TXU-caused pollution.   Downwinders float, titled Rick Perrys Smoke Stack Love World Tour, will continue to appear at Perry campaign events beginning Wednesday, Oct. 25 in Dallas. Public Citizen has a strong record of defending the First Amendment rights of ordinary citizens against trademark threats made by large corporations. Dallas civil liberties litigator Michael Linz serves as co-counsel for Downwinders at Risk. To read TXUs demand letter, click here. To read Downwinders response, click here, and to view Public Citizens response, click here. ### ***************************************************************** 46 NRC: NRC Approves Final Rule on National Source Tracking System for Radioactive Materials of Concern News Release - 2006-13 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov No. 06-134 October 25, 2006 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a final rule implementing a National Source Tracking System (NSTS) to enhance controls for certain radioactive materials used in industry, academia and medicine. The tracking system has been developed through close cooperation with other federal and state agencies as part of the NRCs efforts to enhance controls over radioactive materials following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The final rule closely follows recommendations of a joint NRC-Department of Energy report on radiological dispersion devices (RDDs, or dirty bombs) published in May 2003 and is based upon an interim database of radiological sources initiated in 2004 and currently in use by the NRC. The rule also implements provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The final rule, to be published shortly in the Federal Register, will require licensees to report to the NSTS the manufacture, transfer, receipt, disassembly, and disposal of nationally tracked sources. Basic information to be collected will include the manufacturer, model number, serial number, radioactive material, activity and manufacture date of each source. Information on the facilities involved in any transaction will also be included. The National Source Tracking System will be an important component of the NRCs broad and comprehensive effort to enhance the control of radioactive material and prevent its use by our adversaries, NRC Chairman Dale E. Klein said. This system is appropriate for a post-9/11 environment and consistent with recommendations of the international community, other federal agencies and the Congress. The NSTS will apply to radioactive sources that fall in Category 1 or Category 2 of the International Atomic Energy Agencys Code of Conduct for the Safety and Security of Radioactive Materials. There are an estimated 44,000 sources in these categories (considered to be of the greatest concern from a security standpoint) in approximately 16,000 devices in use in the United States. They are typically used in devices such as irradiators, radiography cameras, well-logging devices, Gamma Knife® surgical devices, and radioisotope thermoelectric generators, among others. Licensees will be required to report their inventories and transactions regarding Category 1 sources by Nov. 15, 2007, and of Category 2 sources by Nov. 30, 2007. Inventories must be updated and reconciled annually with information in the database. Once fully operational, the NSTS will enhance the accountability of radioactive sources by helping the NRC and Agreement States (the 34 states that have been given authority by the NRC to regulate the medical, industrial and academic uses of radioactive material) conduct inspections and investigations, communicate nationally tracked source information to other government agencies, and verify legitimate ownership and use of nationally tracked sources. Radioactive materials provide critical capabilities in the oil and gas, electrical power, construction and food industries; are used to treat millions of patients each year in diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures; and are used in technology research and development. In developing its requirements, the NRC aims to provide appropriate safety and security for the materials without discouraging their beneficial use. A proposed rule on the NSTS was published July 28, 2005, in the Federal Register. The agency received 33 comment letters on the proposed rule. In addition, the NRC held public meetings in Rockville, Md., and Houston, Texas, to explain the proposed rule and solicit comment. An additional 17 individuals provided comments at these meetings. The NRCs responses to the comments are included in the upcoming Federal Register notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------- NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. Last revised Thursday, October 26, 2006 ***************************************************************** 47 NRC: NRC Seeks Public Comment on Revisions and Additions to Physical Security Requirements News Release - 2006-13 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov No. 06-135 October 26, 2006 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a proposed rule amending its security regulations related to the physical protection of nuclear power reactors. This proposed rulemaking also includes a limited number of new security requirements for certain facilities that manufacture uranium fuel. The proposed rulemaking supplements requirements for access controls, event reporting, security personnel training, coordination between safety and security activities, contingency planning and protection against radiological sabotage. The proposed rule also adds requirements related to background checks for firearms users and authorization for enhanced weapons to fulfill certain provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. This proposed rulemaking incorporates requirements that had been previously imposed by the Commission through Orders issued after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Additionally, the proposed requirements for safety/security interface address in part, a Petition for Rulemaking (PRM 50-80), which requested regulations for governing proposed changes to facilities that could adversely affect the licensees ability to protect against radiological sabotage. This proposed rule supplements the security requirements deemed necessary by the NRC to protect against the Design Basis Threat (DBT). In November 2005, the NRC issued a proposed rule on the supplemented DBT for public comment. A final DBT rule is still under development by staff. Comments must be received within 75 days of publication in the Federal Register to guarantee consideration by the NRC. Comments submitted later than this date may be considered if practical. They can be mailed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Comments can be hand-carried to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal work days, or they can be faxed to 301-415-1101. E-mail comments can also be sent to SECY@nrc.gov. In addition, comments can also be submitted through the NRCs eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov[exit icon] . The entire proposed rule will also be available at that Web location. More information about security requirements for NRC licensees can be found on the NRCs Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/safety- security.html. ----------------------------------------------------------------- NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. Last revised Thursday, October 26, 2006 ***************************************************************** 48 UPI: NNSA upgrades Russian navy nuke security United Press International - Security &Terrorism - 10/26/2006 1:27:00 PM -0400 WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 (UPI) -- The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration has completed security upgrades against theft or terror attacks at 50 Russian navy nuclear sites. The NNSA, an agency of the U.S. Department of Energy, said in a statement Tuesday that it had completed the security enhancements two years ahead of schedule. "This achievement signifies the completion of nuclear material protection, control and accounting upgrades at all Navy-affiliated sites in the Russian Federation that contain nuclear materials or warheads," the agency said. "Denying terrorists access to nuclear material is our top priority. These upgrades to Russian navy sites make it that much harder for terrorists to get their hands on dangerous nuclear material," said NNSA Administrator Linton F. Brooks. "The fact that we have done this a full two years ahead of schedule shows the importance the administration places on securing nuclear weapons and material at the source and for non-proliferation work in general." The NNSA said the project was carried out under NNSA's International Materials Protection and Cooperation program in cooperation with the Moscow-based Kurchatov Institute and the Russian Ministry of Defense. NNSA personnel, including technical experts from NNSA's Sandia and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, designed and oversaw the upgrades, the agency said. "Examples of security upgrades include the installation of physical protection systems, such as intrusion detection sensors, access controls and hardened defensive position," it said. The NNSA said it was also working with Russia's Strategic Rocket Forces to upgrade security at 25 nuclear sites. The agency said that program was scheduled to be completed by the end of 2007. The agency said it had also recently "begun upgrades at the Russian military storage sites assigned to it" by U.S. President George W. Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin when they met at Bratislava in Slovakia in 2005. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 49 News & Star: Evacuation after nuclear train breaks down at station Published on 26/10/2006 A RAILWAY station was evacuated yesterday afternoon after a train carrying radioactive fuel to Sellafield broke down. The freight train, run by Carlisle-based Direct Rail Services, broke down at Sunderland Central Station when an axle overheated. The station was evacuated after smoke was seen coming from the train, which was carrying two flasks of radioactive material from Hartlepool nuclear power station. It was travelling along a line that passes through Carlisle and on to west Cumbria. British Transport Police and Direct Rail said at no time was there any danger. Officers said the station was evacuated because of diesel fumes. ***************************************************************** 50 Gallup Independent: Waste to be moved through Gallup Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:00:23 -0700 X-Nohoney: yes white-hard - relay H=adsl-63-203-231-61.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (borg.energy-net.org) [63.203.231.61] X-Sender-Host-Address: 63.203.231.61 X-Sender-Host-Name: adsl-63-203-231-61.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net X-Spam-Class: HAM-VERY-WHITELIST >Waste to be moved through Gallup > >By Kathy Helms >Diné Bureau > >WINDOW ROCK 9 The Navajo Nation is preparing to give consent to the U.S. >Department of Energy to move trucks of radioactive waste so "hot" that it >has to be handled by machines rather than humans down Interstate 40 through >10 Navajo chapters. > >In exchange for signing the cooperative agreement with DOE's Carlsbad Field >Office, shipments of remote-handled transuranic waste would be allowed to >pass through the reservation and the Gallup area on their way to the Waste >Isolation Pilot Project in Carlsbad, N.M. > >The Navajo Nation would receive a financial assistance award of $50,000, >which would go to Navajo Division of Public Safety Executive Director Samson >Cowboy to fund the position of Emergency Services Liaison under the >Department of Emergency Management. > >Total cost of the project is estimated at $250,000, though there is no >guarantee the Nation would receive that amount, according to DOE. > >The budget documents contained in the legislation introduced by Delegate >Lorenzo Curley (Houck/Lupton/Nahata dziil) during Monday's meeting of the >Intergovernmental Relations Committee and approved 8-0, were signed by >Cowboy and Johnny Johnson, DEM program manager. > >Transuranic waste, or TRU, is waste material contaminated with Uranium-233 >and its daughter products, plutonium and other nuclides. It is produced >primarily from reprocessing spent fuel and from the use of plutonium in the >fabrication of nuclear weapons. > >The liaison is to be hired to educate local community members on the effects >of the transuranic waste materials being transported through 20 miles of >Navajo Nation trust lands along I-40. The liaison also will develop a >hazardous materials emergency preparedness and response plan in the event of >a radioactive waste spill on I-40. > >SACRIFICE ZONE >The 10 Navajo chapter communities are located within a four-mile buffer zone >along I-40, running west and east, in Apache and McKinley counties. A >combined population of 10,894 persons would be impacted, according to the >Statement of Work. > >This does not include the thousands who potentially could be impacted in the >areas of Gallup and Grants. > >Hiring of the Navajo WIPP liaison is justified by I-40's close proximity to >Navajo families and livestock living within two to three miles of the >interstate, according to the document. > >The radioactive waste would pass through Nahata dziil, where the Nation >plans to develop its first full-scale casino, as well as the chapters of >Houck, Lupton, Manuelito, Tsayatoh, Red Rock, Church Rock, Iyanbito, Thoreau >and Baca. > >Delegate Curley said the affected Navajo communities and chapters "will >benefit from the education grant from the Department of Energy," which will >pay for publishing articles in tribal newspapers or public information >bulletins. > >"The shipments that have been going through historically, you could walk up >to it and be around it without it having any adverse affect on your health. >But it's going to be changed," Curley said. > >"The type of waste that's going to come through in trucks along I-40, you >cannot come around that. The type of stuff that we're talking about here may >be dangerous to those people that live along these communities. > >"We need to move forward, get these monies and train these people" in how to >handle potential radioactive waste spills, he said. > >IN DOE WE TRUST >According to the Statement of Work, the DOE, and thus Carlsbad Field Office, >as an agent of the federal government, has a trust responsibility to the >Navajo Nation. "This responsibility includes involving and assisting the >Navajos in necessary preparations for the safe transport of transuranic >radioactive waste from DOE Site to the WIPP." > >Public Law 102-579, the WIPP Land Withdrawal Act, as amended, states that >DOE shall "provide technical assistance and funds for the purpose of >training public safety officials, and other emergency responders in any >state or Indian tribe through whose jurisdiction DOE plans to transport >transuranic waste to or from the WIPP." > >The cooperative agreement between Navajo and DOE satisfies the federal trust >responsibility and provides funding for support in accident prevention, >emergency preparedness, public information and participation in large-scale >WIPP exercises, the document states. > >The Carlsbad office will provide the Navajo WIPP Emergency Services Liaison >with advance notification of shipments and the liaison will inform emergency >response personnel. The liaison also will identify traffic problems on the >route used for WIPP shipments. > >Under the conditions of acceptance of the award, the Department of Energy >assumes no responsibility with respect to any damages or loss arising out of >any activities undertaken with the financial support of this award. > >DOE reserves the right to cancel any awards made under the cooperative >agreement if the Navajo Nation fails to meet its obligations. > >Tuesday >October 24, 2006 >Waste to be moved through Gallup >All contents property of the Gallup Independent. >Any duplication or republication requires consent of the Gallup Independent. >Please send the Gallup Independent feedback on this website and the paper in >general. >Send questions or comments to gallpind@cia-g.com ***************************************************************** 51 Deseret News: Goshute leader backs N-storage [deseretnews.com] Thursday, October 26, 2006 By Deborah Bulkeley Deseret Morning News GRANTSVILLE — Lawrence Bear has little to say about his recent election as chairman of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, but he did make it clear he supports a plan to store nuclear waste on the Tooele County reservation. "I support PFS," said Bear, who according to preliminary results was elected, the Bureau of Indian Affairs said Wednesday. The election likely means the end of a decade of leadership by Chairman Leon Bear, whose leadership has been in dispute with some band members and the state for years, largely because of a deal he spearheaded with Private Fuel Storage, a consortium of nuclear utilities, to build a temporary storage facility on tribal land about 50 miles from Salt Lake City. Those plans appear in serious jeopardy since the Department of Interior denied the facility's lease last month. PFS has not said publicly what it will do next. PFS spokeswoman Sue Martin said the consortium had not heard the official results yet so could not comment on a specific winner. "We will work with whoever the tribe elects," she said, adding that the contract to store nuclear waste on a portion of the reservation is not with particular people but with the whole tribe. Margene Bullcreek, a band member who has long opposed the proposal, said Wednesday she was disappointed another supporter of PFS was elected chairman, but she saw hope in the other two officials elected. Marlinda Moon was elected vice chair, and Lena Knight was elected secretary, both are apparently political newcomers. "Mr. (Leon) Bear had relied more on PFS and didn't develop anything," Bullcreek said. Bullcreek was among those who have called into question Leon Bear's leadership, claiming his opponents were cut off from the band's coffers. The outgoing chairman has called seven elections then canceled them since his term expired in 2004, citing a lack of a quorum of 44 voting members of the band. In 2001, three band members claimed to replace Bear in a special recall election. The BIA didn't recognize the recall and continued to recognize Leon Bear as chairman. Leon Bear is on federal probation after pleading guilty to federal charges. He has been ordered to repay the Internal Revenue Service $13,101 in unpaid taxes and to repay his tribe $31,500 for duplicate stipends he billed the band. This month's election was conducted via mail by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Ballots were sent to some 88 eligible voters and 49 people voted. The results were provided by certified mail Wednesday to those who voted. BIA officials said it's now up to the band members to make the change in leadership happen. Lawrence Bear said there would probably be a meeting, but he didn't know when. Such BIA intervention is rare. However, the federal agency stepped in at the request of band members last month after the three-member executive committee was effectively dissolved when vice chairwoman Lori Bear resigned. The secretary position was already vacant. The lack of an executive committee had effectively shut down the band's government. On Wednesday, Leon Bear said he accepts the election results. "I've served the tribe for 10 years," Bear said. "I did my thing, and I think I served them well." Lawrence Bear, 72, is retired from the Utah Department of Transportation. He is Leon Bear's uncle and has served in the past as chair and vice chair. For now, he said his priority is simply "getting things together." He said he'll confer with the two other newly elected members of the executive council and work on getting the band's Salt Lake office up and running. While he said he'd work on issues such as building band unity and economic development, he didn't discuss specifics. Bullcreek said the band's government should also either develop a constitution and bylaws or strengthen its traditional form of government. She added that it's possible the elections could be contested, noting the official change of leadership still needs to take place. Still, she seemed optimistic. "I'm glad we have gotten to this stage," Bullcreek said. "I feel satisfied with the people who got into these positions." Contributing: Suzanne Struglinksi © 2006 Deseret News Publishing Company ***************************************************************** 52 RIA Novosti: Russian-Kazakh JV to mine first ton of uranium in early Dec. 26/ 10/ 2006 MOSCOW, October 26 (RIA Novosti) - A Russian-Kazakh joint venture will mine its first metric ton of uranium in Kazakhstan in the first week of December, Russia's nuclear chief said Thursday. The joint venture was set up in 2004 and is exploring a uranium ore deposit with estimated reserves of 19,000 metric tons of uranium in Zarechnoye, near the border with Central Asian neighbors Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. "In early December, we are going to celebrate the production of the first ton of uranium at the Zarechnoye JV," said Sergei Kiriyenko, head of the Federal Atomic Energy Agency. Techsnabexport, Russia's state-controlled uranium supplier and a provider of uranium enrichment services, holds a 49.33% stake in the joint venture. Kiriyenko said earlier that Russia, which accounts for 8% of the world's uranium output, should replace its non-renewable gas resources with nuclear energy. Russia's reserves of coal and natural gas will be depleted in 50 years, and in response Russia is planning to expand its nuclear energy sector and meet 60-70% of its uranium demand domestically by 2015. He said that uranium production was not profitable earlier in Russia, when the average price for one kilogram was $40. However, with the price now at $100 per kilogram, production has become profitable. Kiriyenko said Russia intends to extend its cooperation with all uranium-producing countries. He said that in Soviet times, Russia produced a considerable amount of uranium for military purposes, which could last the country for many decades. But he added that the current increase in uranium production was necessary for the full-scale development of Russia's nuclear sector. © 2005 RIA Novosti ***************************************************************** 53 Salt Lake Tribune: Skull Valley: Former leader out as Goshutes elect a new slate Leon Bear defeated, but his uncle is elected in mail ballot; results must still be verified By Patty Henetz The Salt Lake TribuneArticle Last Updated:10/26/2006 12:40:26 AM MDT Leon Bear, the most ardent supporter of a nuclear waste disposal site in Skull Valley, has been shut out in the Goshute tribal leadership election, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) announced Wednesday. The preliminary count of 49 mail-in votes showed the new tribal chairman is Lawrence Bear, a former tribal chairman and Leon Bear's uncle. Marlinda Moon defeated Leon Bear to become vice-chair; and Lena Knight has been elected committee secretary, according to a memo from Phoenix-based BIA spokesman Wendell Peacock. The BIA and the tribe still must verify the results for them to be official. Even if the results stand, it was uncertain Wednesday how the leadership change might affect Private Fuel Storage's plans to build an open-air project to store 44,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel rods on the reservation 45 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The lease the tribe signed with PFS is still in effect, said PFS spokeswoman Sue Martin. "The election is for tribal officers. The lease is between PFS and the entire band, not a particular set of officers," she said. "We are eager to work with whomever they elect." Martin noted that Lawrence Bear has been part of the PFS negotiations since the 1990s. "He's certainly no stranger to this project," she said. Last month, however, the Interior Department blocked transportation of waste to the site and invalidated the previously approved lease between the tribe and its utility-company partners. And since last fall, seven of the eight remaining nuclear utility members of the consortium have pulled out of the partnership. Neither Lawrence Bear nor Leon Bear could be reached for comment, nor could Lena Knight. Moon declined during a telephone call to comment because the results haven't been verified. Margene Bullcreek, who has fought Leon Bear and other members of the tribe who supported high-level nuclear waste storage on the reservation 45 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, welcomed new leadership. "I'm satisfied with the results," she said, adding she hoped Moon and Knight would help stabilize tribal governance. The 124-member tribe has been in turmoil for years under Leon Bear's chairmanship, largely over how the money PFS paid the tribe has been spent, but also in failed attempts to wrest control from him. Last year, Bear pleaded guilty to filing a false federal tax return and agreed to pay $13,000 in back taxes and repay the tribe $25,242 in various duplicate stipends he received, plus an additional $6,300. In exchange, the federal government dropped five charges of embezzlement and fraud based on charges he had stolen $160,952 from tribal programs. Moon and two others who claimed they were the tribe's legitimate leaders were charged in 2003 with using bogus legal documents to take control of nearly $1.4 million in tribal funds that were held at Zions Bank, Brighton Bank and Bank One. Moon pleaded guilty last year and is making reparations. Some tribal members are complaining about the way the BIA conducted the election because it was done with mail-in ballots instead of at a meeting of the tribal General Council, which consists of all the adult members. Chester Mills, superintendent of the Uintah-Ouray Agency BIA office in Duchesne County, made the arrangements. "The BIA didn't do it how we do our tribal business," said Mary Allen, a former tribal secretary and signatory to the PFS lease who continues to support the project. "I would like to know how many people received ballots," Allen added, saying her sister and a nephew had not. BIA Regional Director Allen Anspach said Wednesday that 88 ballots were sent out via certified mail; 45 ballots were returned by last Friday, the deadline. Bear held power longer than his elective term because he repeatedly canceled elections, claiming the council meetings lacked a proper quorum. That's why the tribe asked the BIA to intervene, Bullcreek said, adding now it's time for the tribe to rebuild itself. "The big job is, we need to strengthen our tribal government," she said. "We need to start having programs for employment and housing on the reservation. We are an indigenous people. We have our sovereignty. We need to build on that." Privacy Policy | MNG Corporate Site Map ***************************************************************** 54 ITAR-TASS: Russian-Kazakh uranium enrichment JV in Angarsk to be co-financed 26.10.2006, 12.18 [ borde MOSCOW, October 26 (Itar-Tass) - Russian-Kazakh nuclear power joint ventures acquire visible shape, Kazakh Prime Minister Danial Akhmetov said at a meeting with the Russian Federal Atomic Energy chief, Sergei Kiriyenko, on Thursday. “Earlier, we’ve agreed to create three uranium enrichment joint ventures and design low capacity reactors. Now we are going to study these agreements in detail,” he said. “A uranium enrichment joint venture in Angarsk will operate on the conditions of co-financing,” Akhmetov said. A first-ever international centre for providing nuclear cycle services, including uranium enrichment, will be also built in Angarsk, the Irkutsk region. Rosatom chief Sergei Kiriyenko said “the centre will allow new countries to get low-enriched uranium for nuclear power generation, but will guarantee non-proliferation.” The agreement on creating the centre was reached at a meeting with Russian and U.S. presidents within the framework of the G8 summit in St. Petersburg last July. The Angarsk-based centre will become operational in early 2007 and will be controlled by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). © ITAR-TASS. All rights reserved. You undertake not to copy, ***************************************************************** 55 FOE Scotland: NUCLEAR WASTE - BRIBERY NO SOLUTION TO DEADLY LEGACY Friends of the Earth Scotland - Press Releases 25 October 2006 Ministers told to close door on new nuclear Ministers have announced plans to offer communities inducements to host dumps for the UK's deadly radioactive waste legacy. [1] Friends of the Earth Scotland reacted to the news by calling on ministers to immediately halt all plans to build new nuclear power plants and to ensure that any consultation about potential sites went much wider than just 'host' communities. In June 2005, the names of all 537 locations once identified as potential sites for disposing radioactive waste were published. Of the 537 locations initially considered, 159 were in Scotland. [2] Friends of the Earth Scotland's Chief Executive, Duncan McLaren, said: "Dumping nuclear waste in holes in the ground, whether in Scotland or England, is no solution to the problem of dealing with this country's deadly radioactive waste legacy. Solving the problem, should not begin with bribes, but should instead start with a pledge not to create any more waste. "Nuclear power is a white elephant technology with so many unwanted problems during and after its operation. This latest part in the waste saga is further evidence that creating further waste from new nuclear power stations should not be countenanced. "No sites have been identified for a nuclear dump, nor are there proven designs, accurate costs or willing host communities. Currently anywhere in the country remains a potential dump site. "Even if a community were to accept inducements to host a dump, it is vital that each and every affected community is properly consulted. After all, an escape of radiation from a transportation accident or from a leaking dump site will not respect artificial town or county boundaries." ENDS NOTES TO EDITORS: [1] Today's statement: July's statement: [2] Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, in June 2005, Nirex was forced to publish the names of all 537 locations once identified as potential sites for disposing of the UK's dangerous radioactive waste. Of the 537 locations initially considered, 159 were in Scotland: Highlands - 45 Strathclyde - 41 Western Isles - 21 Shetland - 17 Orkney - 15 Grampian - 8 Lothian - 4 Dumfries & Galloway - 4 Fife - 3 Tayside - 1 ***************************************************************** 56 Mos News: Russian-Kazakh Uranium Enrichment Center to Start Work Soon - MOSNEWS.COM Created: 26.10.2006 17:47 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 17:47 MSK MosNews The head of the Russian Federal Nuclear Power Agency Sergei Kiriyenko said on Thursday, Oct. 26, that a joint Russian-Kazakh uranium enrichment center would soon start working. The venture will mine its first of uranium in Kazakhstan in the first week of December. “We will complete the preparatory procedure before the end of the year and will be able to announce the start of its work,” Kiriyenko said, quoted by the Interfax agency. Earlier this year the Russian official said that uranium enrichment center, which could produce nuclear fuel for nations wanting to develop civilian atomic energy, could start operating next year. The new center is to be built at the Angarsk Electrolysis Chemical Plant in Eastern Siberia, which produces uranium fuel for nuclear power plants. The Angarsk center will enrich Kazakh uranium, Kiriyenko said adding that the first ton of uranium for the venture will be mined in the first week of December. Kazakhstan has 30 percent of the world’s uranium reserves and is currently the fourth biggest uranium producer, according to the KazAtomProm state nuclear company. KazAtomProm plans to boost production more than fourfold by 2010 to 15,000 metric tons (16,500 short tons) and become the world’s largest uranium producer. Write us: info@mosnews.com Copyright © 2004 MOSNEWS.COM ***************************************************************** 57 DOE: DOE Announces Over $8 Million to Increase Use and Availability of Alternative Fuels October 25, 2006 WASHINGTON, DC Today, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Samuel W. Bodman announced $8.6 million for 16 projects to expand the use of alternative transportation fuels. Combined with funding from the participants, more than $25 million will be invested in the nations alternative fuel infrastructure. The grants are part of the Clean Cities program and were selected under three topic areas including Refueling Infrastructure for E85 and Alternative Fuels; Incremental Cost for Alternative Fuel Vehicles; and Idle Reduction Training and Awareness for School Districts. This public-private partnership helps bring diversity of supply to our transportation fuel market, Secretary Bodman said. We need to integrate a diversity of supplies and a diversity of suppliers in order to reduce our reliance on any one particular type of fuel, or particular supplier. By building our energy infrastructure we create an environment in which American consumers have more choices in the transportation fuel they use. The selected projects represent significant diversity among the recipients and geographic location. They include pioneering efforts to bring alternative fuel infrastructure to regions of the country in which it does not currently exist. The Refueling Infrastructure topic area considered projects that include new dispensing facilities, or additional equipment or upgrades and improvements to existing refueling sites for alternative fuel vehicles (AFV). The 13 projects selected under this topic include the installation of alternative fuel blending and refueling infrastructure at over 180 locations in 25 states and the District of Columbia. This includes the installation of infrastructure to dispense E85 at both converted and new stations. Additional projects involve the installation of biodiesel blending capabilities at existing petroleum facilities for improving the availability and distribution of low-level biodiesel blends. Two projects are focused on infrastructure for compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Successful implementation of the planned infrastructure projects is expected to result in reducing the consumption of petroleum-based fuels by up to 30 million gallons per year. The Incremental Cost for Alternative Fuel Vehicles topic area provides support for projects for the incremental cost of placing new or converted highway-certified vehicles in service. A single project for propane-powered vehicles was selected under this topic area that is expected to result in the reduction of diesel fuel by over 100,000 gallons per year. The Idle Reduction Training and Awareness for School Districts topic area considered the development and implementation of comprehensive school bus driver, student, faculty, and parent education and awareness programs to eliminate or reduce idling in school districts. Two projects were selected under this topic. A complete list of the projects selected for negotiation is provided below: REFUELING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR E85 AND OTHER ALTERNATIVE FUELS WestStart-CALSTART in Pasadena, CA, will install 15 publicly accessible E85 refueling stations along interstate highways in the Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, and the San Joaquin Valley areas. Additionally, five of these locations will potentially also have biodiesel fueling capability. Team members include CleanFuel USA, United Oil, Pacific Ethanol, State of California, and General Motors. Clean Cities partners include Southern California, San Joaquin Valley, and Central Coast. DOE Share: $495,000 Proposed Total Project Cost: $2,371,363 National Biodiesel Board in Jefferson City, MO, will install six biodiesel blending terminals at existing petroleum facilities in five states including Arizona, Florida, Indiana, New York, and Pennsylvania. The primary approach of the project is to market biodiesel in relatively low blending ratios with conventional diesel. Team members include Sustainable Energy Strategies, HWRT Oil Company, Independence Biofuels, Inc., Sprague Energy, TransMontaigne, and West Central. Clean Cities partners include Greater Long Island, Greater Philadelphia, Tucson, and Florida Gold Coast. DOE Share: $494,998 Proposed Total Project Cost: $3,539,101 World Energy Alternatives, LLC in Chelsea, MA, will expand the availability of biodiesel by installing rack-injection, in-line blending capabilities at four diesel terminals including Tacoma, Washington; Champaign, Illinois; Robinson, Illinois; and Toledo, Ohio. The proposed in-line blending is expected to significantly improve quality control of the final product. Team Members include Marathon Petroleum Co, Sound Refining Inc, and the City of Toledo. Clean Cities partners include Puget Sound and Central Ohio. DOE Share: $707,700 Proposed Total Project Cost: $3,165,360 Commonwealth of Virginia in Richmond, VA, will install up to 12 publicly accessible E85 fuel dispensing stations along the I-95, I-64 Crescent Corridor that passes through Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. This project will make E85 available to an estimated 15,000 public and private flex fuel vehicles. Team members include the State of Maryland, the DC Energy Office, the General Services Administration, and General Motors. Clean Cities partners include Virginia Hampton Roads, Maryland, and Metro Washington. DOE Share: $284,000 Proposed Total Project Cost: $767,000 New York State Energy Research and Development Authority in Albany, NY, will install up to about 30 publicly accessible E85 refueling stations across the state of New York and will leverage the New York State Thruway Authoritys activities in developing E85 along state thruways. Team members include the NY Department of Transportation, NY Department of Motor Vehicles, NY Thruway Authority, and NY Dept of Agriculture and Markets. Clean Cities partners include Western New York, Genesee Region, New York City, Greater Long Island, and Capital District. DOE Share: $500,000 Proposed Total Project Cost: $1,170,000 Prometheus Energy Company in Seattle, WA, will install a liquefied natural gas (LNG) refueling station at the Kiefer Landfill, located in Sacramento, California. The station will serve the County of Sacramentos fleet of garbage trucks that currently run on LNG and other LNG-capable waste hauling fleets that use the landfill. Team members include NorthStar Inc., and the City of Sacramento. DOE Share: $600,000 Proposed Total Project: $1,200,000 The Triangle J Council of Governments in Research Triangle Park, NC, will install E85 refueling infrastructure at 21 stations and B20 infrastructure at 14 stations along heavily traveled interstates in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Tennessee. Team members include United Energy, Osage, and Georgia Power. Clean Cities partners include Triangle, Palmetto State, East Tennessee, Middle Georgia, and Centralina. DOE Share: $586,000 Proposed Total Project: $1,353,080 State of Colorado in Denver, CO, will install publicly accessible E85 and biodiesel refueling stations at five locations throughout Colorado. Work will also include educating car dealers and the general public about the benefits of alternative fuels. Team members include Great Western Ethanol, General Motors, and numerous state and county agencies. Clean Cities partners include Colorado Springs, Northern Colorado, and Denver Metro. DOE Share: $350,000 Proposed Total Project: $1,047,000 State of Indiana in Indianapolis, IN, will establish a network of E85 and Biodiesel refueling stations spanning from Lake Michigan to the Gulf of Mexico. The project will coordinate the placement of 31 public access alternative fuel refueling stations along 886 miles of the I-65 corridor from Gary, Indiana to Mobile, Alabama including 19 stations in Indiana, three in Kentucky, three in Tennessee, and six in Alabama. Team members include the Indiana Soybean Board, the Indiana Department of Transportation, the Kentucky Energy Office, the Tennessee Energy Office, and various retailer outlets. Clean Cities partners include Central Indiana, South Shore, Middle Tennessee, Central Alabama, and Kentucky. DOE Share: $1,332,288 Proposed Total Project: $2,874,689 Salt Lake City Clean Cities Utah Clean Cities Coalition in Salt Lake City, UT, will expand the compressed natural gas (CNG) public refueling structure with two additional stations and assist three CNG customers in adding refueling facilities for expanded fleet usage. The two public CNG facilities will be along I-15. Team members include Questar Gas Co, Qwest Communications, Diamond Parking, and Durrent's Bakery. DOE Share: $370,000 Proposed Total Project: $1,259,600 Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority in Springfield, OR, will establish one wholesale E85 rack in a centralized location and install a minimum of 15 E85 retail refueling stations in the Pacific Northwest along the I-5 corridor. Team members include the Oregon Department of Energy, Tyree Oil, Sequential Biofuels, and Star Oil. Clean Cities partners include Puget Sound and Columbia-Williamette. DOE Share: $662,425 Proposed Total Project: $1,487,325 Kum & Go, L.C. in West Des Moines, IA, will install E85 refueling infrastructure at 24 of their existing retail stations. Nineteen sites are in Iowa and the rest are in South Dakota and Minnesota. General Motors is a team member. DOE Share: $1,500,000 Proposed Total Project: $3,500,000 Greater Philadelphia Clean Cities, Inc. in Philadelphia, PA, will convert 14 existing refueling infrastructure locations to have E85 dispensing capability. These stations will be located along a 200-mile corridor from State College, Pennsylvania to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Team members include General Motors, Independence BioFuel Inc., and various retailers including Worley & Obetz, and Shipley. DOE Share: $280,380 Proposed Total Project: $914,880 INCREMENTAL COST OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES (AFVs) Paramount Scaffold, Inc. of Carson, CA, will receive cost share funding for the incremental cost of replacing 44 existing diesel-powered, medium-duty flat-bed trucks with 44 liquid-propane-powered trucks for the companys service area of Los Angeles, San Diego, and Las Vegas. Team members include CleanFuel USA and Expo Propane Inc. Clean Cities partners include Southern California. Requested DOE Share: $267,410 Proposed Total Project: $631,820 IDLE REDUCTION TRAINING AND AWARENESS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS Salt Lake City Clean Cities Utah Clean Cities Coalition in Salt Lake City, UT, will create and disseminate a model idle-reduction program that can be easily replicated by school districts across the country to help them reduce petroleum consumption, save on fuel costs, minimize harmful emissions, and protect childrens health. This project includes the development of an idle-reduction curriculum, training in six partnership school districts in Utah and Nevada, and the dissemination of the school bus idling reduction model to schools nationwide. The current idling baseline will be established to determine the effectiveness of the program. Team members include the National Energy Foundation, the Nevada Office of Energy, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute, the National School Board Association, the Cache County School District, the Washington County School District, and the Salt Lake School District. DOE Share: $100,000 Proposed Total Project: $115,000 Association of Central Oklahoma Governments in Oklahoma, City, OK, will conduct idle reduction training and awareness for school districts in central Oklahoma. The project will include the development and demonstration of techniques to reduce fuel usage and harmful emissions, demonstration of the benefits of idling policies, publishing and presentation of project results including best practices and fuel savings realized, training of transportation directors, bus drivers and key communicators, and dissemination of results to all Oklahoma school districts and school districts nationwide. Team members include the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and the Choctaw Nicoma Park Public Schools. Clean Cities partners include Central Oklahoma. Requested DOE Share: $50,242 Proposed Total Project: $50,242 The Clean Cities Program was created in 1993 as a result of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 to provide technical, informational, and financial resources to both regulated fleets and voluntary adopters of alternative fuels and is focused on advancing the economic, environmental, and energy security of the United States by supporting local decisions to adopt practices that contribute to the reduction of petroleum consumption in the transportation sector. Since its inception in 1993, Clean Cities has grown to over 80 coalitions and 4,800 stakeholders across the country, put close to 1 million AFVs on the road, and displaced over 1 billion gallons of gasoline. In 2004 alone, Clean Cities displaced 237 million gallons of gasoline through the use of alternative fuels, AFVs, idle reduction technologies, fuel economy measures, and hybrid vehicles. Media contact(s): Craig Stevens, (202) 586-4940 [ ] U.S. Department of Energy | 1000 Independence Ave., SW | Washington, DC 20585 1-800-dial-DOE | f/202-586-4403 ***************************************************************** 58 Tri-City Herald: Worker complaints draw changes Published Thursday, October 26th, 2006 By Annette Cary, Herald staff writer Washington Closure Hanford is making changes after an independent review found some workers were leery of raising safety issues or slowing work to correct safety problems. The Department of Energy hired a consultant to interview workers about the Hanford contractor's safety culture after it received about 50 worker complaints during the contractor's first 13 months of work to clean up the Columbia River corridor. More than half of the complaints were made anonymously. "We're troubled by what the investigation turned up, but we're encouraged Washington Closure has acknowledged the problems and is taking corrective actions," said Colleen French, spokeswoman for DOE at Hanford. "There is no project, no deadline, no milestone out here that is more important than the safety of the work force." The DOE review found the contractor needed to make improvements in its Employee Concerns Program, its work safety planning, its safety oversight for nuclear and other hazards and its program that allows any worker to stop a job if it appears work would be unsafe. "We are taking it seriously," said Todd Nelson, Washington Closure spokesman. "There are a lot of things under way." The contractor has about 775 employees and another 300 workers through subcontractors, with about a third of them represented by organized labor. Washington Closure received the draft findings of the DOE review Friday and Washington Closure President Pat Pettiette told employees in a memo Wednesday about the findings and planned changes. "Indications are that there exists a 'chilling effect' and even a hostile work environment in some areas of the project which may be prohibiting some employees from bringing issues forward," Pettiette said in the memo. This week Washington Closure assigned a full-time manager to the Employee Concerns Program and will add one to two more professionals to the program, Pettiette said. It had been staffed halftime. The program will report directly to Pettiette to ensure confidentiality and a direct and speedy response from top management, he said. The contractor also is starting a work control process with the goal of getting workers more closely involved and involved earlier in planning jobs to predict, then avoid safety hazards. It also will seek feedback after jobs are completed. A task force is being assigned this week to assure consistency and discipline in the program, Pettiette told employees. Statistics seem to indicate the contractor has an excellent safety program, Nelson said. But Washington Closure learned from the investigation that concerns remain about the way work is conducted, worker involvement and questions that for some employees have not been answered to their satisfaction, Pettiette said. "Thus, our commitment is to listen better to your concerns and be sure that they are answered before work proceeds," he told employees. Pettiette said one meeting has been held with managers and another was planned Wednesday with supervisors to convey his expectations that the contractor will treat workers with respect and engage them in addressing safety concerns and planning. An outside expert is helping to improve management response and resolution to work place issues. Despite the contractor's good employee safety record, it has had four electrical "near misses" in recent months that could have injured workers. In one case a worker was shocked, but not injured, when he used a portable saw in a wet area. DOE plans to deduct $100,000 from its payment to Washington Closure because of the problem. The review also found some employees have been reluctant to use a standard Hanford safety tool -- the authority of any worker to stop a job if he believes work would be unsafe. Some employees of subcontractors on the project are not paid during work stoppages and that may make some employees hesitant to call for a stop. Other options also are available, such as a program that encourages employees to take a few minutes before a job starts to ensure conditions are safe. Officials will be visiting job sites to talk with employees and identify barriers to safety time-outs and stop-work processes, Pettiette said. More changes will be made as the contractor receives more input from employees, he said. "You have every right to expect to continue with your good work in a safe, collaborative and engaged environment and I am committed to seeing that you have it," he told employees. DOE will be working closely with Washington Closure to build the kind of safety environment it considers critical to the type of work done at Hanford, French said. © 2006 Tri-City Herald, Associated Press &Other Wire Services ***************************************************************** 59 Tri-City Herald: Ex-official Grumbly speaks on vit, DOE Published Thursday, October 26th, 2006 By Annette Cary, Herald staff writer A former top-level Department of Energy official predicted more struggles ahead for Hanford's $12.2 billion vitrification plant at a Wednesday lecture at Washington State University Tri-Cities. Tom Grumbly, who was DOE assistant secretary for environmental management and then undersecretary in the '90s, returned to the Tri-Cities to speak before a crowd of about 130 people at the 20th Anniversary Public Lecture of the Herbert M. Parker Foundation. Washington's senators have done a good job of persuading Congress to keep paying for construction of the plant to treat World War II and Cold War radioactive waste, but the job will only get tougher, Grumbly said. People outside the Northwest don't have a clue about the radioactive and chemical stew left from processing fuel to produce plutonium for the nation's nuclear weapons program, he said. And they question how the cost of treating those 53 million gallons of waste in Hanford's underground tanks could possibly be justified, he said. Political support will shrink as DOE completes cleanup of other sites around the nation contaminated by Cold War nuclear weapons production and fewer states have a direct interest in the issue, he said. Just as DOE has pulled together teams of the best and brightest experts it can find to review technical, schedule and budget issues at the vit plant, it needs to pull together a team to look at how it will be paid for long term, he said. He recommended authorizing payment upfront, then finding a payment schedule that makes more sense than the current plan of asking Congress for the same amount of money -- $690 million -- each year. Break the work up into doable pieces, Grumbly said. Then find ways to get some of the work done sooner rather than later, because Congress tends to have a short attention span, he said. He warned that the estimated cost of the vitrification plant, which already has more than doubled since 2003, likely will go up again. He and Mike Lawrence, a former DOE Hanford manager, agreed that much of the reason the plant will be so expensive is because the Hanford waste contains the most complex mix of radionuclides and hazardous chemicals in the DOE complex. When the plant does start to treat waste, changes are likely to be needed, so the plant needs to be built for flexibility, Lawrence said. Part of Hanford's cleanup troubles may be traced to the nation's changing attitudes after the end of the Cold War that continue to influence public attitudes about cleanup, Grumbly said. With the start of the Atomic Age, a new set of values emerged. As nuclear weapons were developed the nation saw the need for keeping science secret. Physics, engineering and chemistry emerged as the most important disciplines mankind had created; they had been used to end a terrible war. With the future of the nation at stake, all that mattered were results. Cost was secondary. But with the end of the Cold War, the public began to question the culture of secrecy, Grumbly said. They feared that results-oriented work resulted in accidents, he said. They questioned whether disciplines such as chemistry and physics needed to be reined in. And they feared money was being wasted at Hanford and elsewhere, he said. Grumbly also predicted what Hanford might look like in the future. Even as cleanup is being completed, the site will be left with the vitrification plant, a very large, highly contaminated facility, he said. It also may be left with many of the glass logs of immobilized waste the plant is being built to produce. Although the waste is supposed to go to a national repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev., that project also is mired in controversy. Expect far more people to live near the site, he said. And expect the state to eventually tell DOE it's time to move out and let the state manage the site, he said. Grumbly is vice president for civil programs for Lockheed Martin Information Technology. Lawrence is deputy director at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. © 2006 Tri-City Herald, Associated Press &Other Wire Services ***************************************************************** 60 washingtonpost.com: Security Officials Sent to Los Alamos - By DEBORAH BAKERThe Associated Press Thursday, October 26, 2006; 12:03 PM -- Federal security officials and computer experts have been sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory to ensure directives at the nation's premier nuclear weapons lab are being followed in the wake of a possible security breach. The FBI was called in last week after police in northern New Mexico stumbled onto what appeared to be classified information from the lab while arresting a man at a mobile home for possession of drug paraphrenalia. The information was discovered on computer during a search for evidence of a drug business, said Los Alamos Police Sgt. Chuck Ney. He said police alerted the FBI to the documents, which appeared to contain classified material. The mobile home's owner, who wasn't home at the time, was listed as a former employee of one of the lab's subcontractors. Linton Brooks, head of the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration, said Wednesday he was sending NNSA's chief of defense nuclear security to investigate, along with a team of computer specialists to ensure compliance with department directives at the lab. He said investigators want to find out how the latest possible security breach could occur despite "extraordinary efforts in the last three years to put strong security procedures in place" at Los Alamos and other weapons facilities. Los Alamos has a history of high-profile problems that have highlighted sloppy inventory control and security failures at the nuclear weapons lab. In 2000, nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee pleaded guilty to one count of mishandling computer files. In 2004, the lab was temporarily shut down after two computer disks were reported missing; it turned out they never existed and it was an inventory error. The lab was put under new management and the Energy Department began moving toward creating a diskless environment to prevent classified material from being carried out. "We intend to do everything possible to guard against any criminal activity, particularly where a breach of security may be involved," Lab Director Michael Anastasio said. Gov. Bill Richardson, a former energy secretary in the Clinton administration, noted the lab had made efforts to improve security but apparently not enough. "We need to plug the leaks, we need to beef up security," the governor said Wednesday. "This can't keep happening." FBI spokesman Bill Elwell in Albuquerque said the investigation is continuing and that he couldn't talk about the evidence seized from the home or the individuals connected to the case. The woman who owned the mobile home had worked for lab subcontractor Information Assets Management until about two weeks ago. A spokeswoman at Information Assets Management would say only that the woman "is not currently employed with us." The company helps organizations shift from paper-based files to electronic systems. The federal charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material is a misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison and up to a $100,000 fine. » © 2006 The Associated Press + The Washington Post: | | | | | | | ***************************************************************** 61 DenverPost.com: Tepee finds new home in Cold War museum By Ann Schrader Denver Post Staff Writer Article Last Updated:10/26/2006 01:39:55 AM MDT "A POWERFUL AND CONTROVERSIAL SYMBOL" | In the late 1970s, a revolving group of activists, inlcuding Beat poet Allen Ginsberg, camped near the nuclear-trigger factory. (Post file / Ernie Leyba) For nine months, a tepee pitched on railroad tracks leading into Rocky Flats was a rallying symbol to those seeking to close the nuclear-weapons facility. The tepee also was home from April 1978 to January 1979 to a revolving group of activists, including Denver native Patrick Malone. "It was a car-stopper," said Malone, a member of the Rocky Flats Truth Force who now lives in Atlanta. The tepee idea "wasn't the result of pre-planning as much as simply adjusting as needed." Malone figures he lived in the tepee for 180 of its 270-day existence, sometimes with people like Beat poet Allen Ginsberg, who wrote "Plutonium Ode" about the Rocky Flats protests. The tepee was "a powerful and controversial symbol, and we hope to re-create that," said Kim Grant, president of the Rocky Flats Cold War Museum board. On Saturday, Malone will present the tepee to the museum during an event that will feature talks by Malone and other activists who protested Rocky Flats' role in the Cold War. The museum aims to document facets of Rocky Flats from the perspectives of employees, protesters and government agencies. Many artifacts come from more than 100 buildings that were decontaminated and destroyed as part of the $7 billion Superfund cleanup completed in late 2005. About 6,000 acres of the 6,500-acre Rocky Flats site will become a wildlife refuge next year. In March 2006, local developer Charles Church McKay, whose family owned the land that the federal government bought to build the plant, donated 1.4 acres for the museum. The donation is contingent on the museum's being financed and ready for groundbreaking by Jan. 1, 2008. Since it was incorporated in 2001, the museum has raised more than $300,000 from Kaiser-Hill, which performed the cleanup; the Colorado State Historical Fund; and private individuals. It's expected to cost $13 million. "I never thought they'd close the plant, not in my lifetime," said Malone. As for the tepee ending up in a museum, he said, "I'm excited as heck, personally." Staff writer Ann Schrader can be reached at 303-278-3217 or aschrader@denverpost.com. What Rocky Flats was The Rocky Flats plant, located about 16 miles northwest of downtown Denver, produced about 70,000 plutonium triggers for nuclear weapons from 1952 until 1989. Presentation: Saturday's free event will begin at 2 p.m. at the former plant's west gate on Colorado 93 near Colorado 72. Mementos sought: Contributions and artifacts may be sent to Rocky Flats Cold War Museum, P.O. Box 871, Arvada, CO 80001. All contents Copyright 2006 The Denver Post or other copyright ***************************************************************** 62 Federal Times: Another possible data security breach at Los Alamos October 26, 2006 Another possible breach at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico is raising new questions about data security at the troubled nuclear weapons facility. Los Alamos police responding to a domestic violence call on Oct. 17 at the home of former laboratory subcontractor Jessica Quintana found three thumb drives with markings indicating they came from the lab, according to Jessica Blea, an office specialist for the police department. Police also found glass pipes with methamphetamine residue in Quintana’s home, Blea told Federal Times on Oct. 26. The FBI searched Quintana’s home on Oct. 20 and seized more evidence, said FBI spokesman Bill Elwell. Elwell said the report has been sealed and he would not discuss what the FBI found. Los Alamos spokesman Kevin Roark would not say what kind of information was on the thumb drives. [ class=] Laboratory director Michael Anastasio issued a statement Oct. 26 confirming the breach. Anastasio said Los Alamos is working with the FBI to decide what immediate and long-term actions need to be taken in response to the discovery of the drives in Quintana’s home. “We have already taken a number of steps to address potential security risks,” Anastasio said. “Some actions may have an impact on daily routines at the laboratory. This matter is a reminder that constant vigilance by everyone is necessary to ensure a safe and secure laboratory.” Los Alamos television station KRQE reported that Quintana was an archivist whose contract with the lab expired three weeks ago. She has not been charged with any crime, Blea said. But critics of the lab say the latest data breach shows little has improved. “This appears to be a new low,” said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight. In July 2004, former director Peter Nanos stopped all work and suspended 15 employees after two computer disks containing weapons information disappeared. Nanos held an all-hands meeting that month urging employees to confront co-workers who ignore safety or security procedures. And in 1999, former Los Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee was accused of spying for China and charged with 59 counts of mishandling classified information and violating the Atomic Energy Act. Spying charges against Lee collapsed after the FBI acknowledged it had bungled the case. Lee, who had spent nine months in jail awaiting trial, pleaded guilty in September 2000 to improper handling of restricted data and was freed. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said in May 2004 that all Energy facilities will use diskless workstations for classified information by 2009. Abraham hopes this will eliminate the problem of security breaches caused by lost or stolen disks or hard drives. slosey@federaltimes.com [Email this story to a friend] ***************************************************************** 63 lamonitor.com: Police discover suspected classified data The Online News Source for Los Alamos CAROL A. CLARK Monitor Senior Reporter Three computer jump drives confiscated by police on Oct. 17 during an arrest at 2025 East Jemez Road #250 are suspected of containing classified information. "We recognized that some of the items we seized under our search warrant were possibly property of the laboratory and turned it over to them for analysis and verification," Los Alamos Police Chief Wayne Torpy said. "Once the laboratory confirmed that this was a federal jurisdictional issue - the FBI was called in." The FBI responded to the case to the Monitor this morning. "Evidence obtained as a result of the police investigation was brought to our attention and from there probable cause lead to our obtaining a search warrant," FBI Special Agent Bill Elwell said. "We can't make any comments at this time because the court ordered sealing of the search warrant." Elwell did say there have been no charges filed or arrests made as of this morning. Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Michael Anastasio said in a statement this morning that on Tuesday the FBI publicly confirmed its ongoing investigation of a potential breach of security by a former LANL subcontractor employee. "Unfortunately, my ability to discuss the details of this matter is constrained due to the nature of the situation," Anastasio said. "What I can say is that this is a serious matter and we are taking immediate steps to address it." Police report that Justin Stone, 20, of 2125 33rd St., was arrested at the mobile home on an outstanding warrant for a probation violation. He also was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia after police discovered components of a possible meth lab in the home. Jessica Quintana, a woman in her early 20s, has resided in the mobile home for a couple of months and according to reports is in the process of purchasing it. Reports also indicate that Quintana was employed as a data entry clerk at Information Assets Management, a LANL subcontractor, before being laid off. She most recently worked for a two-week period at the YMCA before her suspension last Wednesday following Stone's arrest at her home, executive director Linda Daly said this morning, adding that Quintana was officially dismissed on Monday. Magistrate Court Judge Pat Casados sentenced Stone on Oct. 18 to two years in jail for violating his probation. She sentenced him to an additional six months for his Oct. 17 drug paraphernalia possession charge. Stone will serve those sentences concurrently, Casados said. Stone's initial probation violation stems from a July 14 arrest in which he was charged with possession of stolen property, possession of a stolen credit card and possession of drug paraphernalia, Casados said. She charged him on April 11 to 30 months of supervised probation that included community service and fee repayment. "His outstanding warrant included failure to report, failure to make monthly probation fees and failure to complete monthly community service hours," Casados said. Stone was initially arrested after Goldie, Sgt. Chuck Ney, Cpl. Jon Gonzales and Cpl. Doug Johnson responded to a 4:16 p.m. call from a neighbor alerting them to a loud argument taking place inside the home. "While making the arrest, we saw pipes and other paraphernalia," Goldie said. "We secured the premises and obtained a search warrant, then removed all the items." Goldie described the items, including glass drug pipes, jars, a digital scale, marijuana seeds, acetone, hydrogen peroxide and the propane and torches. There also was a processing filter packed with kitty litter and cotton found at the scene," he said at the time. "A lot of this was inside a backpack that was stuffed into a duffel bag," Goldie said. "This shows how compact and mobile meth labs can be." Police were extremely concerned with a number of chemical burns found inside the backpack along with broken beaker containers, which indicate a lack of caution in handling the volatile chemicals. "What's scary to me is there were families living within 30 feet of this dangerous stuff," Johnson said. Johnson praised Royal Crest Mobile Home managers for their efforts to remove people involved in drug activity from their park. "They have done a fantastic job and this incident is a holdout that we are glad we have identified and removed from the community." This is the third time in less than two weeks that the LAPD has removed a drug operation from the community. On Oct. 4, police responded to a report of shots fired and uncovered a stash of meth lab equipment, narcotics and weapons at 3483 Questa Drive. On Friday they removed 31 bags of marijuana, controlled substances and drug paraphernalia from 1027 Iris St. after following up on an anonymous tip. Anastasio stated in a press release this morning that in conjunction with the FBI, the lab began and will continue to pursue the facts surrounding the incident. "We have already taken a number of steps to address potential security risks," he said. "Some actions may have an impact on daily routines at the laboratory. We ask that everyone become an active participant in this process to assure a positive outcome." Anastasio reiterated how seriously he regards this matter as one of utmost concern and said as has been their management practice, they will take immediate and decisive action to address any safety and security issues. This morning Royal Crest Manager Steve Gianes addressed the heightened interest surrounding the home located in his park. "We're learning about all this from the news media just like everybody else," Gianes said. "We spoke with an FBI official here Monday night who did say that this wasn't something that would put anyone in any kind of danger." © 2003 Los Alamos Monitor All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 64 lamonitor.com: Big magnet ready for new tests at LANL ROGER SNODGRASS Monitor Assistant Editor A major new research facility for high magnetic field science at Los Alamos National Laboratory is set to open for national and international researchers. The laboratory announced Tuesday that after 10 years of preparation, the world's most powerful pulsed, non-destructive magnet has been commissioned for user operation at 85 tesla. A tesla is a measuring unit for magnetic fields and gets its name from Nikola Tesla, a Serb-American, whose inventions formed the foundation of our alternating current system. The laboratory's magnet, which has achieved 87.8 tesla and is expected to reach 100 tesla in time, is the most powerful of its kind in the world, said Alex Lacerda, who leads the National High Magnetic Field (NHMFL) -Los Alamos Center. At 100 tesla the magnet would be 200,000 times stronger than the earth's magnetic field. "It's a tremendous scientific and engineering accomplishment," he said in a telephone interview this morning. "It's like a very powerful microscope that allows you to zoom into any material." The lab says the generator supplies 1.4 billion watts of power and is itself the largest magnetic power source, with enough power to supply the entire state of New Mexico for a couple of minutes. The generator was rescued from an abandoned nuclear power project in Tennessee and holds the record as the heaviest object ever to move on New Mexico highways. The generator produces power that is stored and then pulsed to create the powerful magnetic fields. Only magnets created by destructive explosions are more powerful. Combining very low temperatures with a powerful magnetic field, researchers can examine materials at a nanometer scale, a billionth of a meter. Among anticipated applications are investigations of large organic molecules, such as drugs. Lacerda said researchers are lined up to use the equipment, but most of the current work is being done internally. "It's like a new car. You want to drive it around a little bit before driving it to California," he said. The supermagnet is located at Technical Area 35 in the NHMFL's Pulsed Field Facility, a designated international user facility. © 2003 Los Alamos Monitor All Rights Reserved. ***************************************************************** 65 AFP: FBI investigating possible security breach at Los Alamos lab - Thu Oct 26, 2:42 PM ET LOS ANGELES (AFP) - FBI" /> agents are investigating a possible breach of security at the Los Alamos National Laboratory that followed a drug bust in New Mexico, US officials said. Agent William Elwell of the FBI field office in Albuquerque said no arrests had yet been made but investigations were ongoing after the seizure of material from a home at a trailer park. "We are still analysing the material and at the moment all I can say is that we believe there are grounds for the investigation to continue," Elwell told AFP by telephone. "I can't comment on what we have discovered so far." The possible security breach at the nuclear weapons research centre came to light after Los Alamos police were called to a domestic disturbance on October 17 and found evidence of drug use. That led to execution of a search warrant which discovered materials believed to have come from the Los Alamos lab, where the atomic bomb was first developed by scientists during WWII. "During the course of the search, officers realized that some of the items seized appeared to belong to the Los Alamos National Laboratory," the Los Alamos County Police Department said in a statement. Local media reported the suspicious materials belonged to a data clerk at the lab, and said police unearthed three computer memory sticks in the raid. A separate FBI search warrant was carried out on October 20 but Elwell would not disclose what material federal investigators were looking at. Los Alamos officials quote by local media stressed that the search related to a former employee whose contract expired several weeks ago. A spokesman for the laboratory appeared to play down the significance of the employee's job in comments to The New Mexican newspaper. "It's clear this person was not a scientist," spokesman Kevin Roark said, declining to elaborate on the data or materials that may have been found. "I can't speak to the nature of the information or the materials. It's a matter of security." Los Alamos National Laboratory Director Michael Anastasio said in a statement Wednesday "we will take immediate and decisive action to address any safety and security issues. This matter is a reminder that constant vigilance by everyone is necessary to ensure a safe and secure Laboratory." It is not the first time that Los Alamos has been at the centre of a security alert. The most notorious recent case involved Taiwanese-American scientist Wen Ho-Lee, who was accused of stealing nuclear secrets for China. Investigators later dropped the original charges but Lee pleaded guilty to improperly handling classified data as part of a plea deal. Two years ago another security alert was sparked when it emerged that two computer disks containing sensitive information had gone missing. Copyright © 2006 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 66 UPI: U.S. nuclear secrets feared on stolen disk United Press International - NewsTrack - 10/26/2006 7:33:00 AM -0400 LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Oct. 26 (UPI) -- The discovery of computer disks that may contain nuclear secrets at a home has triggered a security review at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Authorities who asked not to be identified told the Washington Post three disks seized last week appear to contain classified material from the nation's top nuclear research facility. However, the FBI search warrant has been sealed, the report said. The disks were found by Los Alamos police last week, and first reported Tuesday. Officers responded to a domestic violence call at a trailer home where they found drug paraphernalia and other evidence of methamphetamine trafficking. After a full warrant was issued, the computer disks were discovered, and the FBI was notified. Investigators said a woman living at the trailer is a Los Alamos contract lab technician with high-level security clearance, the Post said. The National Nuclear Security Administration announced it has begun its own investigation and has sent a "cyber security team" to Los Alamos to review procedures, the report said. © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 67 Guardian Unlimited: Security Officials Sent to Los Alamos From the Associated Press [UP] Thursday October 26, 2006 5:16 PM By DEBORAH BAKER Associated Press Writer Federal security officials and computer experts have been sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory to ensure directives at the nation's premier nuclear weapons lab are being followed in the wake of a possible security breach. The FBI was called in last week after police in northern New Mexico stumbled onto what appeared to be classified information from the lab while arresting a man at a mobile home for possession of drug paraphrenalia. The information was discovered on computer during a search for evidence of a drug business, said Los Alamos Police Sgt. Chuck Ney. He said police alerted the FBI to the documents, which appeared to contain classified material. The mobile home's owner, who wasn't home at the time, was listed as a former employee of one of the lab's subcontractors. Linton Brooks, head of the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration, said Wednesday he was sending NNSA's chief of defense nuclear security to investigate, along with a team of computer specialists to ensure compliance with department directives at the lab. He said investigators want to find out how the latest possible security breach could occur despite ``extraordinary efforts in the last three years to put strong security procedures in place'' at Los Alamos and other weapons facilities. Los Alamos has a history of high-profile problems that have highlighted sloppy inventory control and security failures at the nuclear weapons lab. In 2000, nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee pleaded guilty to one count of mishandling computer files. In 2004, the lab was temporarily shut down after two computer disks were reported missing; it turned out they never existed and it was an inventory error. The lab was put under new management and the Energy Department began moving toward creating a diskless environment to prevent classified material from being carried out. ``We intend to do everything possible to guard against any criminal activity, particularly where a breach of security may be involved,'' Lab Director Michael Anastasio said. Gov. Bill Richardson, a former energy secretary in the Clinton administration, noted the lab had made efforts to improve security but apparently not enough. ``We need to plug the leaks, we need to beef up security,'' the governor said Wednesday. ``This can't keep happening.'' FBI spokesman Bill Elwell in Albuquerque said the investigation is continuing and that he couldn't talk about the evidence seized from the home or the individuals connected to the case. The woman who owned the mobile home had worked for lab subcontractor Information Assets Management until about two weeks ago. A spokeswoman at Information Assets Management would say only that the woman ``is not currently employed with us.'' The company helps organizations shift from paper-based files to electronic systems. The federal charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material is a misdemeanor that carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison and up to a $100,000 fine. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2006 ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************