***************************************************************** 06/01/04 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 12.130 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 Las Vegas SUN: Iran Denies Nuke Relations With N. Korea 2 Las Vegas SUN: N. Korea Accuses U.S. of War Pretext Plot 3 US: [NYTr] US Offers Evidence on Padilla's "Dirty Bomb Plot" 4 US: Reuters: Kerry: Nuclear terrorism is gravest threat to US 5 US: WorldNetDaily: What's a neocrazy to do? 6 US: Reuters: Bush Seeks to Broaden Fight Against Spread of WMD 7 VANUNU interviewed 8 VANUNU INTERVIEW / SUNDAY TIMES 9 Las Vegas SUN: Partition Bonds India, Pakistan Leaders 10 BBC: Europe's energy use still rising 11 Haaretz: Vanunu: Exposing Israel's nuclear secrets was not betrayal 12 Seychelles NATION: Assembly paves way for peaceful use of nuclear ma 13 FT: Anger as Malaysia detains nuclear suspect 14 Toronto Ontario Star: Ontario urged to drop nuclear fix, seek altern 15 Xinhuanet: Nuclear attack against US inevitable: US academic 16 Maariv International: BBC airs interview with Vanunu 17 ThisisLondon: Britain faces EU 'nuclear fine' NUCLEAR REACTORS 18 US: FLS: Nuclear power could mean the end of America's oil dependenc 19 US: Salt Lake Tribune: An overdue debate: Boosting nuke power to avo 20 KoreaTimes: Quakes Cause Public Fears About Nuclear Plant Safety 21 US: NRC: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, R. E. Ginna Nuclear 22 US: Reuters: Constellation seeks new license for N.Y. nuke 23 National Post: Use renewables, not nuclear: report 24 Sofia Morning News: Bulgaria's N-plant Contracts German NUKEM, GNB 25 US: NRC: Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Find 26 US: NRC: Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for th NUCLEAR SAFETY 27 [NYTr] Vieques: Military Failure to Clean Up Denounced 28 [DU-WATCH] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq 29 Taipei Times: Potassium iodide pills part of nuclear safety campaign 30 Aljazeera.Net: Radioactive machine stolen in China 31 US: The Ledger: Man Exposed To Radiation 32 US: Casper Star Trib: Company seeks gas near nuclear bomb site 33 US: New York Times: As New York Fumes, Wyoming Says It, Too, Needs 34 New Straits Times: Radioactive material to be safely shipped out of 35 St. Petersburg Times: Bellona Wins Case on Secrets of Nuclear Subma NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 36 US: Las Vegas SUN: AP: Miners Drawn to Illegal Congo Uranium 37 JoongAng Daily: 10 localities' voters tender new bids for nuclear wa 38 UPI: Bulgaria signs nuclear waste plant deal - 39 startribune: Editorial: Nuclear waste/Best plan: No dregs left behin 40 KoreaTimes: 11 Counties Vie for Nuclear Waste Site 41 AU ABC: Govt clarifies waste transport risk » NUCLEAR WEAPONS US DEPT. OF ENERGY 42 Hanford New: Nuclear stockpile stewards devise new tests 43 Boston Globe / Opinion: A nuclear band-aid OTHER NUCLEAR 44 Google News Alert - nuclear 45 Google News Alert - nuclear 46 New York Times: Looking for Some Help for Love Canal's Other Site ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 Las Vegas SUN: Iran Denies Nuke Relations With N. Korea ASSOCIATED PRESS SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - Iran said Tuesday it has never received nuclear technology from communist North Korea. "We never had nuclear relations with North Korea," Iran's Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said at a press conference in Seoul. Kharrazi said Iran's nuclear technology is self-developed, and the international community doesn't need to worry about his country's nuclear capabilities, according to South Korea's Yonhap news agency. Iran Embassy officials in South Korea were not immediately available for comment. Earlier this month, diplomats told The Associated Press that evidence gathered by the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency suggests North Korea was the source of nearly two tons of uranium hexafluoride delivered to Libya as part of attempts by Moammar Gadhaffi to build nuclear warheads. The investigation was incomplete, but the evidence highlights concern that North Korea could be running a uranium-based nuclear weapons program, or supplying other nations the know-how to build atomic arms. The United States and other countries accuse Iran of running a covert nuclear weapons program. Iran has rejected the allegations, saying its program is geared only toward generating nuclear power. "We will act in accordance with the International Atomic Energy Agency," Kharrazi said, according to Yonhap. On Saturday, North Korea denied allegations it provided Libya with uranium in early 2001, and accused the United States of running a "smear campaign" against it. -- ***************************************************************** 2 Las Vegas SUN: N. Korea Accuses U.S. of War Pretext Plot By HANS GREIMEL ASSOCIATED PRESS SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - North Korea on Monday accused the Bush administration of making up reports about the North's nuclear weapons program as a pretext for war, saying it echoed similar allegations Washington made about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before the U.S.-led invasion. The published commentary came as regional powers are trying to arrange a third round of talks on defusing the standoff over North Korea's nuclear ambitions. The United States, North Korea and four other nations agreed to meet before July, but no date has yet been set. At issue are Washington's charges that North Korea is running a secret enriched uranium-based nuclear weapons program besides the plutonium-based one the communist nation has acknowledged. The dispute flared in October 2002, when the United States said North Korea admitted operating the uranium program in violation of international agreements. North Korea has publicly denied this, and the nuclear talks have since bogged down, in part, over the question of how to handle the uranium allegations. On Monday, North Korea accused the United States of fabricating the uranium program as a way of fanning concern about weapons of mass destruction and winning public support for an invasion. "The Bush war forces are going to apply what it used in Iraq to the DPRK," said North Korea's official KCNA news agency. "Having worked out a plan to launch a new war on the Korean peninsula in the wake of that in Iraq, the U.S. is building up in advance public opinion about fictitious development of 'enriched uranium' in the DPRK." DPRK stands for Democratic People's Republic of Korea, North Korea's official name. Eradicating weapons of mass destruction was cited by the Bush administration as a primary reason for invading Iraq. No such weapons have been found, despite extensive searches. Before the war, Bush had lumped Iraq together with North Korea and Iran as members of his "Axis of Evil." "The U.S. does not hesitate to wantonly violate the sovereignty of other countries by setting afloat sheer lies for its own selfish interests," the KNCA report said. The United States believes North Korea already has one or two atomic weapons and enough raw material to make several more on short order. North Korea says it is willing to freeze its nuclear weapons program in exchange for aid. But Washington demands that the alleged uranium program be included and says assistance won't come until the North has committed to "complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantling" of all nuclear development. -- ***************************************************************** 3 [NYTr] US Offers Evidence on Padilla's "Dirty Bomb Plot" Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:24:35 -0500 (CDT) Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit The Scotsman - Tue 1 Jun 2004 http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3005569 Al-Qaida American Planned Dirty Bomb Attack - U.S. Claims "PA" An American, suspected of being an al-Qaida member, was training to blow up hotels and apartment buildings in the US in addition to a possible attack with a bdirty bombb radiological device, according to government documents. The documents, released by the Justice Department today, said that former Chicago gang member Jose Padilla and an al-Qaida accomplice were to enter the US through Mexico or Puerto Rico. bPadilla and the accomplice were to locate as many as three high-rise apartment buildings which had natural gas supplied to the floors,b the government summary of interrogations revealed. bThey would rent two apartments in each building, seal all the openings, turn on the gas, and set timers to detonate the buildings simultaneously at a later time,b the papers alleged. The documents said al-Qaida officials were sceptical of Islam convert Padillabs ability to set off a dirty bomb but were very interested in the apartment operation. Top al-Qaida officials bwanted Padilla to hit targets in New York City, although Florida and Washington DC were discussed as well,b the summary said. Padilla was to conduct an Internet search on buildings that had natural gas heating, open a bank account and obtain documents needed to rent an apartment. The plot called for blowing up 20 buildings simultaneously, but Padilla said he could not rent multiple apartments under one identify without drawing attention. Padilla, who has not been charged with any crime and whose confinement is pending before the Supreme Court, has been in a military prison in South Carolina for about two years. The Supreme Court is expected to rule this month whether American citizens like Padilla who are deemed benemy combatants,b can be held indefinitely in military jails without any of the traditional legal rights. Padilla was arrested by the FBI at Chicagobs ObHare International airport in May 2002 after arriving on a flight from Pakistan. He was held as a bmaterial witnessb for a federal grand jury investigating the September 11 attacks. But a month later, President Bush invoked his power as commander in chief and declared Padilla an enemy combatant. He was sent to a military jail. * To subscribe or unsubscribe or change your settings via the web, visit: http://tania.blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr ================================================================= NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us 339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012 http://www.blythe.org e-mail: nyt@blythe.org ================================================================= ***************************************************************** 4 Reuters: Kerry: Nuclear terrorism is gravest threat to US Tue Jun 1, 2004 03:27 AM ET By Patricia Wilson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nuclear terrorism is the gravest threat the United States faces, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry said on Tuesday as he offered a plan to secure atomic arsenals and materials around the world. "The enemy is different and we must think and act anew," Kerry said in excerpts of remarks prepared for delivery in West Palm Beach, Florida. "We have to do everything we can to stop a nuclear weapon from ever reaching our shore and that mission begins far away." In the second of three speeches on national security, Kerry is expected to propose a new high-level White House job to oversee efforts to prevent a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons and recommend speeding up a current program to secure nuclear material in the former Soviet Union. "The greatest threat we face today (is) the possibility of al Qaeda or other terrorists getting their hands on a nuclear weapon," Kerry said. "Osama bin Laden has called obtaining a weapon of mass destruction a 'sacred duty.'" The senator from Massachusetts, a 20-year veteran of the Foreign Relations Committee, also said he wanted to end nuclear programs in countries like Iran and North Korea. Kerry has criticized President George W. Bush for refusing to hold bilateral negotiations with North Korea. He has said he would adopt a two-track policy of continuing the six-party talks that include Russia, Japan, China and South Korea while also holding direct discussions with Pyongyang. After the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, Kerry said Americans needed to "take away politics, strip away the labels" and ask honest questions. "Have we done everything we could to secure these dangerous weapons and materials? Have we taken every step we should to stop North Korea and Iran's nuclear programs? Have we reached out to our allies and forged an urgent global effort to ensure that nuclear weapons and materials are secured?" NUCLEAR DEACTIVATION "The honest answer, in each of these areas, is that we have done too little, often too late, and even cut back our efforts," he said. A Kerry foreign policy adviser said when Bush came to office he curtailed the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, known as Nunn-Lugar after the two senators -- Democrat Sam Nunn and Republican Richard Lugar -- who created it. In the past decade, the program has spent $4 billion to help former Soviet states eliminate or secure nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, including the deactivation of more than 6,000 nuclear warheads. Kerry has supported expanding and accelerating Nunn-Lugar as an important defense against terrorists and rogue states obtaining old Soviet weapons of mass destruction. "If we secure all bomb-making materials, ensure that no new materials are produced for nuclear weapons, and end nuclear weapons programs in hostile states like North Korea and Iran, we will dramatically reduce the possibility of nuclear terrorism," he said. The presumptive Democratic nominee, who is locked in a tight battle with Bush five months ahead of the Nov. 2 election, has launched an 11-day mini-campaign devoted to national security as the chaos in Iraq and the June 30 handover to an as-yet-unnamed interim government dominates the headlines. Last week, he outlined four "imperatives" -- rebuilding alliances "shredded" by Bush's go-it-alone policies, modernizing the U.S. military, using diplomacy, intelligence, economic power and American values to defeat threats and freeing the United States from its "dangerous dependence on Middle East oil. Bush and his Republican allies have tried to portray Kerry as an equivocating liberal, soft on defense and weak on fighting terrorism. ***************************************************************** 5 WorldNetDaily: What's a neocrazy to do? MAY 29 2004 © 2004 WorldNetDaily.com When President Bush declared war on terrorism, he pledged to prevent regimes – such as North Korea, Iran and Iraq – from providing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons to terrorists. Of course, Iran and Iraq had both developed chem-bio weapons and had used them against each other in the Iran-Iraq War. And, in the aftermath of the Gulf War, the International Atomic Energy Agency discovered that Iraq – a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty – had attempted to develop nukes, taking advantage of the fact that IAEA inspectors were then limited to visiting "declared" facilities. However, as a condition of the Gulf War cease-fire, Iraq was required to destroy – under the supervision of United Nations inspectors – all its chem-bio weapons, and to destroy – under the supervision of IAEA inspectors – what remained of its unsuccessful nuke program. Furthermore, in the aftermath of the Gulf War, the IAEA Board of Governors developed a model of an Additional Protocol to be negotiated and signed by all NPT-signatories. The IAEA's Safeguards regime was to be transformed, thereby, from a simple quantitative system into a qualitative system. Henceforth, the IAEA would develop a comprehensive picture of an NPT-signatory's nuclear and nuclear-related activities, including nuclear-related imports and exports. The Additional Protocol also provided the IAEA the authority to visit any facility – declared or not – to investigate questions or inconsistencies in an NPT-signatory's declarations. As of Bush's declaration of war, neither Iran nor North Korea had yet signed an Additional Protocol. But – as a consequence of the cease-fire resolutions – Iraq was effectively already subject to an Additional Protocol for nukes and for chem-bio weapons, as well. That presented a major problem for the neo-crazies. Thanks to Bob Woodward, we know that Bush already had the Pentagon working on an invasion plan for Iraq. Furthermore, public opinion polls showed that the only acceptable rationale for such an invasion would be the possession by Iraq of nukes and an intention to give those nukes to terrorists. What were the neo-crazies to do? Well, first attack the IAEA. Discredit it. Call Director General Mohamed ElBaradei a liar, or worse. Tell Congress and media sycophants there is incontrovertible proof that Saddam Hussein will have nukes to give terrorists within a few months. Then, a few days later, attack Iraq. Unfortunately for the neocrazies, the whole world soon learned the IAEA and its enhanced Safeguards system was effective. And ElBaradei was not lying. There had been no attempt to resuscitate Iraq's nuke programs. None. Worse, North Korea withdrew from the NPT on the eve of the invasion and began recovering weapons-grade plutonium from the spent-fuel elements formerly under IAEA lock and seal. Soon, the Koreans really could have nukes to give terrorists. Worse still, Iran announced it would negotiate and sign an Additional Protocol. What were the neo-crazies to do? Well, there was essentially nothing they could do about North Korea. All our armed forces were needed to suppress Iraqi opposition to our occupation. There were no forces available to invade Iran, either. So, get Congress to pass Concurrent Resolution 398 which: calls upon all State Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – including the United States – to use all appropriate means to deter, dissuade, and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons – including ending all nuclear and other cooperation with Iran (including the provision of dual use items) – until Iran fully implements the Additional Protocol between Iran and the IAEA for the application of safeguards. Then set about foiling Iran's attempts to "fully implement" an Additional Protocol. How? Declare economic war. Resolution 398 also: A) urges Japan to ensure that Japanese commercial entities not proceed with the development of Iran's Azadegan oil field; B) urges France and Malaysia to ensure that French and Malaysian commercial entities not proceed with their agreement for further cooperation in expanding Iran's liquid natural gas production field; C) calls on all countries to intercede with their commercial entities to ensure that these entities refrain from or cease all investment and investment-related activities that support Iran's energy industry; and D) calls on the president to enforce the provisions of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 to discourage foreign commercial entities from investing in Iran's energy industry. So, how's the economic war against "terrorism" going? Well, last week, Spain – our former military ally in Iraq – signed textile, shipping, fisheries, agriculture, tourism and automotive trade agreements with Iran. What's "C'est la guerre" in Spanish? Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for national security affairs to U.S. Sen. Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. -- ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico. [WorldNetDaily.com] --> news@worldnetdaily.com--> Contact WND [http://www.fiberinternetcenter.com] ***************************************************************** 6 Reuters: Bush Seeks to Broaden Fight Against Spread of WMD Tue Jun 1, 2004 08:37 AM ET By Wojciech Moskwa KRAKOW, Poland (Reuters) - President Bush said Tuesday an international drive to halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction should be expanded to target those funding the deadly trade. In a videotaped address Bush said his Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), launched a year ago in this southern Polish city, had already boosted security by stopping shipments of dangerous weapons and their components. "We are determined to keep the world's most dangerous weapons out of the world's most dangerous hands," Bush told delegates from 60 countries at the PSI meeting. "I proposed to expand the work of the PSI beyond the interdiction of shipments to disrupt and bring to justice the middlemen and financiers that enable this dangerous trade." Bush welcomed last month's United Nations Security Council resolution calling on countries to expand the legal tools available to fight the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Now PSI participants are grappling with how best to share intelligence and develop their capabilities to stop weapons of mass destruction (WMD) ending up in states viewed with distrust by Washington, such as North Korea, Syria and Iran. "To get an effective campaign worldwide, you have to go after the complete life-cycle of WMD, beginning with the laboratories where it is developed, manufacturing, financial and shipment networks," U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton told Reuters on the sidelines of the meeting. In a coup for Bush's initiative, Russia joined the core-PSI group Monday, casting aside doubts the initiative could hamper its trade with countries at odds with Washington. But Moscow's delegate to the meeting, Siergiey Kislyak, made clear that PSI would not supersede national roles. "Each and every country is responsible for combating illegal trade. The PSI might be useful by raising international awareness and by helping coordinate efforts," he told reporters. The PSI's biggest achievement so far has been the interception by the United States and its allies of a Libya-bound ship carrying weapon components. The seizure last year helped persuade Libya to finally drop its nuclear weapons program. Delegates hoped to amend regulations on international shipping, which carries three-fourths of global trade, to make it easier for agents to board vessels as well as boost security and self-policing measures among operators. ***************************************************************** 7 VANUNU interviewed Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 14:03:46 -0500 (CDT) possibly repptitious !! MichaelP ================== http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/432459.html Ha'aretz, Israel - May 27, 2004 Sunday Times gets first interview with Vanunu since release from jail "I suspected she was an agent for the Mossad," Mordechai Vanunu says of the woman who lured him into captivity, in an interview that will be published in the Sunday Times on Sunday. He was interviewed by journalist and author Yael Lotan, an activist for nuclear disarmament in the Middle East and a member of the Movement for the Liberation of Mordechai Vanunu. The interview was made on Saturday on behalf of the British journalist Peter Hounam and a BBC production crew working on a documentary of the Vanunu story. The interview was what led the Israeli secret service, the Shin Bet, to arrest Hounam. Lotan told Haaretz the story in the Sunday Times, the first since Vanunu was released after 18 years in jail for revealing Israel's nuclear secrets to the same British newspaper, will appear under her name. "To a certain extent we bypassed in a legal way the limitations imposed on Vanunu," she said. Among limitations set by the Shin Bet and the courts is that Vanunu is not permitted to meet foreign nationals without the approval of the authorities. Consequently, the interview was not held by a foreigner but an Israeli, bypassing the restriction. Before the interview, Lotan met Hounam in the compound of the St. George Anglican church, where Vanunu has been staying since his release, and with Chris Mitchell, the producer of Magnetic North, the company producing the BBC documentary. She admits to consulting the two but stresses "I did not receive any guidance or questions from them. I know the subject very well." She then met with Vanunu, and an Israeli cameraman and aide, and carried out the interview inside the church. Meir Vanunu, one of Mordechai's brothers, was also present and photographed the scene. Lotan insists neither Hounam or Mitchell were present during the interview. The Shin Bet disagrees, saying that both foreigners were in the hall and could hear and see the interview. The interview lasted two hours, in English, according to Lotan. The synopsis of the interview told to Haaretz by Lotan suggests that nothing new was revealed. The only detail that Vanunu mentioned was that he suspected "Cindy," the woman that entrapped him and led to his capture by Israeli agents, of being an agent for the Mossad. Vanunu said he confronted her with a question on her connection with the Mossad. But, he says, Cindy pretended she did not understand a thing and maintained her role as an American tourist. To a different question, Vanunu says he felt the gravest danger for him was in London, because he knew that Israeli intelligence was aware of his presence in the British capital. He therefore left, for Rome, with Cindy. "I did not think they would follow me there," he says. In the interview he answers questions about his background, as a native of Morocco, his childhood and university days. "I did not ask him about nuclear weapons and about the production processes in Dimona," Lotan says, "because I knew that on the basis of the restrictions, he should not be asked about this, and also because I know this subject very well." Lotan says Vanunu spoke in detail about two subjects, his experiences when he left Israel, and his feelings of being 11 out of his 18 years of imprisonment in solitary confinement. Vanunu said he felt he was losing his sanity in solitary and set as his goal "to survive and remain sane." Describing the first time he was released from confinement and was allowed to walk in the courtyard of the prison, Vanunu says "I could walk and see for the first time plants, flowers and humans and then I felt that I was free." Lotan says she was impressed by "Vanunu's display of amazing peace, quiet, self control and sense of humor." Regarding his decision to "tell the world" of the goings on in the reactor in Dimona, Lotan says that Vanunu says he has no more secrets to reveal and he wishes to leave Israel and begin his life anew. In response to the question whether Lotan feels "used" by Hounam and the BBC unit, she says that she would not describe her involvement in the affair as "a trick." Lotan says she is thinking of writing a book on the case and she feels the interview with Vanunu was part of that preparation. She also says she never had the tape of the interview, which Lotan says was always kept by the recording crew. ========= http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2761-1128411,00.html Sunday Times May 30 30 May 04 Introduction Vanunu: the truth about my kidnap by Tom Walker FOR the first time since he was kidnapped by Israeli agents in 1986, Mordechai Vanunu has spoken out publicly about his abduction and 11 years in solitary confinement. Vanunu, in the only interview he has given since he vanished from London 18 years ago, explained why he fell for "Cindy", the Israeli undercover agent who lured him into a honey trap. He revealed that there was a Frenchman among his abductors; told how he was beaten and injected with drugs during his kidnapping; said he had no regrets for taking the wraps off Israel's secret nuclear arsenal and disclosed that he thought he was losing his mind in prison. "You forget the past. Your brain is empty of all the images you have of the past. Watching only walls all day can damage the brain," he said. Vanunu, who left prison last month after serving his full sentence for treason and aggravated espionage, gave the interview to an Israeli journalist as he is banned from speaking to foreigners. Last week Peter Hounam, the Sunday Times reporter who broke Vanunu's story and subsequently campaigned for his release, was arrested in Tel Aviv by Israeli security agents hunting for tapes of the interview. He was freed after the intervention of Vanunu's lawyers and the British ambassador. Vanunu has been unable to tell his story in his own words since September 1986 when he handed Hounam details and photographs of Israel's secret nuclear weapons plant, housed in a deep bunker at Dimona in the Negev desert. Israel has always refused to confirm that it has nuclear weapons. At the time, experts estimated that it had no more than 20 bombs. Vanunu, a former technician at Dimona, revealed that it had the production capacity for well over 100 atomic weapons and was able to make much more powerful thermonuclear bombs. He supplied details of the programme. It was while Vanunu was staying in London, as The Sunday Times checked his disclosures before publication, that "Cindy" caught his eye on a West End street. "She looked like a very nice woman, American, a little bit of a beauty, not tall or short, blonde hair," Vanunu told his interviewer. "After crossing the street she went in one direction and I went in another, but after 50 yards I asked myself if she was interested in me. Go and ask her what she wants, I said to myself. "I caught up with her and asked her, "Who are you and what are you doing?' We started talking." A close relationship developed: "She was good company and affectionate. She used to kiss me a lot - all the time." Cindy persuaded him to take a short holiday with her in Rome, where he was immediately ambushed and repeatedly injected with a drug - "I could walk and see, but I was not in control" - and shipped in chains to Israel. "One (of the guards) was Israeli but we spoke in English. The other one was a Frenchman, speaking in French, not understanding English. I spoke a few words to him because I knew French." He was landed clandestinely on an Israeli beach, strapped to a stretcher and taken to Ashkelon prison where he remained until last month. "To move from being a free man, walking in the streets of London, to finding oneself in a cell is a huge fall - like falling from a very high building to the ground. You lose everything," Vanunu recalled. Initially he was kept "in a very secret part of the prison. Nobody knew about me. They kept me for five days in a small cell without windows". When he was charged with aggravated espionage and high treason, "I was very angry. I was not a traitor; I did not go to any enemy with my information. I didn't work as a spy. I felt they just wanted to punish me". He said his motive was "not about betraying Israel; it was about saving Israel from a new holocaust. My point was to bring the subject to the public and to prevent any future war and make it very clear that war is not the way to solve problems." Vanunu was in solitary confinement for 11-1/2 years of his sentence: "I decided I should do everything I could to keep my sanity. I told myself in the first days: whatever I do, I shall get out of this prison as strong in mind and body as I am now. "I could not speak with anyone, so I decided that I could speak by reading. I used to take the Bible in English to read it in a loud voice, or I prayed in a loud voice, or I was singing, humming. Most of the time my aim was to be alert. I was afraid that I would be under psychological brainwashing - that they could change my mind, put some new idea, a little idea here or there." Vanunu's lawyers are to seek an urgent meeting with Israel's attorney-general to try to lift the ban on him leaving the country or meeting foreigners. They believe the government is in a dilemma about how to handle mounting concern about the restrictions after a week of heavy-handed actions by Shin Beth, the internal intelligence service. Vanunu's brother Meir said Israel had reached the point where a negotiated solution might now be considered. "He has no more secrets to reveal," Meir said. "He has given a detailed press interview with which the secret service can find no fault." Besides arresting Hounam and Saadi Haeri, a BBC editor, last week, Shin Beth also stopped Bishop Riah Abu El-Assal, head of the Anglican church in the Middle East, as he was entering Israel from Jordan on Friday. The bishop has allowed Vanunu to stay at St. George's Cathedral in Jerusalem. "They made me remove all my belongings, took me to a room and interrogated me for 90 minutes," El-Assal said yesterday. "They tried to persuade me to stop providing sanctuary to Mordechai." May 30, 2004 Leading article: Let Vanunu go free The details of the kidnapping and capture of Mordechai Vanunu in 1986 by Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, read more than ever like spy fiction. Mr. Vanunu, a former technician at Israel's Dimona nuclear centre, was in the process of revealing the secrets of his country's nuclear weapons programme to The Sunday Times when he was lured from London to Rome by "Cindy", an attractive blonde "American" working for Mossad. The honey trap was sprung and the courageous whistleblower was not to taste freedom for 18 long years. Now we at last know the details of Mr. Vanunu's abduction, they reveal the brutality with which he was treated. Once delivered by Cindy into the hands of Israeli goons, he was beaten and drugged repeatedly, well beyond the point where it became dangerous. His hands and feet were chained on the journey by ship to Israel. His arrest was kept secret from the outside world. That was just a foretaste of things to come. For 11 years of the 18 he spent in Israel's Ashkelon prison, he was held in solitary confinement for no seemingly good reason. Few of us can comprehend what 11 years alone in a cell measuring three metres by two could have been like. His own despairing descriptions, "You had nothing to do . . . you cannot go anywhere; you cannot come back", probably do not do it full justice. For two years the lights were kept on all day and all night, a camera monitoring his every movement. Even after that, guards would visit his cell every half-hour, keeping him awake so that he was driven to exhausted despair. The aim was clear. The Israeli authorities wanted to break him; they regarded him as an enemy of the state and believed (wrongly) that he had more secrets to reveal. He was, to his great credit, too strong to be broken. But Israel's paranoia has persisted, as we have seen from the absurdly restrictive terms of his release. He is out of prison but far from free, prohibited from going near airports, ports or foreign embassies. His telephone is tapped and he must seek permission before any contact with foreigners, whether journalists or not. According to Joseph Lapid, Israel's deputy prime minister, he remains a danger. "We think he still knows secrets and we don't want him to sell them again," he said this weekend. "We think there are things he knows that he hasn't divulged yet. He may do so - he's hell-bent to harm this country, he hates this country." This is nonsense. Mr. Vanunu did not wish to harm Israel. He wanted to prevent a nuclear holocaust in which he feared that Israel could be destroyed. And he has no more secrets. "I did what I did and it ended with the Sunday Times article (in 1986). Since it was published there are no more secrets. Much more important, it is 18 years since that happened. What Israel has been doing for the last 18 years is its problem, not mine," he says in his interview in News Review today. Israel will never accept that Mr. Vanunu did the world a favour by revealing the scale of Israel's nuclear programme. Instead what we are witnessing from the country's government is vindictiveness and unjustified paranoia. That suspicion extends to those who have contact with him. Last week Peter Hounam, a journalist for this newspaper, was seized by Shin Beth, the country's internal secret service, interrogated and held for 24 hours. This time they were in pursuit of what they believed to be a missing tape of an interview with Mr. Vanunu. There was, of course, no missing tape. Mr. Hounam is now back in London, shaken but little the worse for wear. Mr. Vanunu remains in Israel, bound by the terms of his release. He would like to leave for Europe or America to start a family and embark on a new career, possibly teaching. He does not intend to campaign against Israel or become a focus for anti-Israeli protest. But as long as he is forced to remain in Israel, his supporters will continue to protest and seek to embarrass the government. He has served his sentence. He should be allowed to enjoy genuine freedom. Israel has nothing to lose by it and much to gain by showing magnanimity THE INTERVIEW Vanunu: my story Eighteen years after he was kidnapped and jailed for revealing Israel's nuclear bomb to the world, Mordechai Vanunu has given his first interview, reliving the terror of his abduction and the anguish of solitary confinement, which he suffered for more than a decade. Under the terms of his release from prison, he spoke to an Israeli journalist, Yael Lotan, as he is barred from talking to foreigners. The former technician at Dimona, Israel's nuclear centre in the Negev desert, vividly remembers the events of September 1986, after he had given his story to The Sunday Times. Growing increasingly frustrated as the newspaper checked out his disclosures before publication, he feared that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, was closing in. Yet when the net was cast in a street in London's West End he fell into it. When I arrived in London I thought to myself: be careful, don't engage or try to find any woman. But after two or three weeks I got interested in one. It was a honey trap. She was standing at a place to buy cigarettes when I saw her. She looked like a very nice woman, American, a little bit of a beauty, not tall or short, blonde hair. We both walked on and came to a crossroads, where she stopped and I spoke to her. After crossing the street she went in one direction and I went in another, but after 50 yards I asked myself if she was interested in me. Go and ask her what she wants, I said to myself. I caught up with her and asked her: who are you and what are you doing? We started talking. I was suspicious, and I asked her if she was a Mossad spy. "Oh no, no," she replied. "What is Mossad?" She asked me my name. I said George, because that was the name I had registered under at the hotel - George Foresty. "Oh you're not George," she replied. So I told her who I really was and what I was doing in London. I felt it was not about betraying Israel; it was about saving Israel from a new holocaust, because if they used nuclear weapons then their enemies would retaliate. By publishing Israel's nuclear secrets, the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons, you are preventing them from using them, because all the world will know and no one will let them use them. My point was to bring the subject to the public, to open debate in Israel too, and to prevent any future war and make it very clear that war is not the way to solve problems - you have to solve the problem by peace. Cindy - that was her name - said she was a tourist from Philadelphia, 26 years old. She was working as a beautician, and her father was a writer and her mother also a writer. Her parents were divorced. When I told her about the delays by The Sunday Times she told me: "Come with me to New York, and I will help you with lawyers and good newspapers." We started meeting day after day. We went to the cinema and saw a film, Witness, about a child who saw a murder case, and we went to a play, 42nd Street. The Sunday Times knew I had found this woman. Peter Hounam, my main contact on the paper, told me many times: "Be careful, I don't trust her." Everyone was warning me, but I didn't understand why I should be suspicious of her. She was good company and affectionate. She used to kiss me a lot - all the time. So another Sunday came and The Sunday Times still didn't publish the story. Cindy said she was going to Rome to visit her sister, and she wanted me to go with her. I said no, but I changed my mind. I thought the Mossad was looking for me in London. If I went to Rome they would lose me, and I would come back to London after a few days. I decided not to tell Peter or the others on the newspaper. She bought the tickets. We met in Victoria station and from there we took a taxi to the airport. I was not suspicious, nothing at all. I never suspected her because I was sure that if they wanted to kidnap me or do something they could do it in London. At that time I didn't understand that Italy was an open state. During the cold war many people were kidnapped there, and there were many spy games there. London was a harder place for Israel to act. We landed in Rome, where she said her sister and a friend would meet us. Instead I saw an Italian with flowers coming towards us. We got into his car and he started driving us towards Rome very fast. We sat in the back. She diverted my attention with a lot of kissing until we reached a small house, not in Rome but maybe in a suburb. As I followed her into the house two people jumped on me. They were behind the door; I didn't see them. One hit me in the stomach and, as I bent over, they got me to the ground and shut my mouth. A woman injected me. Cindy had disappeared. I lost consciousness. I awoke on a large bed in my underwear. One man was on the left and the woman was on the other side trying to inject me. They couldn't find a vein. I pointed out the vein in the crook of my right arm. We didn't speak at all; I just pointed with my finger, no language. They injected me again. I passed out once more. When I awoke they gave me my clothes, but I was drugged. I could walk and see, but I was not in control. We left the house and returned to the car. I sat in the back between the two men. The woman who had injected me was in the front with the driver. Through the fog of the drug I decided that, when I woke up, I would try to cause some trouble. Maybe people who saw us fighting would try to stop the car. After 20 minutes or half an hour I could feel the drug wearing off. The car came to a small village. When the driver started slowing down I jumped on him and tried to stop the car by causing an accident.Immediately the two men jumped on me; one hit me in the stomach again. I started shouting for help but one of the men said in Hebrew to the woman: "Inject him twice." "It is very dangerous," she said. "Do it." She injected me and I passed out. I regained consciousness again when I felt the car driving over pebbles. The car stopped and I saw sea and a yacht, and a small commando boat coming towards us. It was night time. >From the commando boat six Israeli soldiers appeared. They put me on a stretcher, took me to the commando boat and ferried me to the yacht. I heard someone shouting in Hebrew: "Put him in the deputy's cabin." In the morning I found myself chained by my hands and legs, and by another chain to the bed. When they brought me breakfast I told them to undo the chains so I could eat. They refused. I did not eat for 48 hours. After two days I started eating and asked them: "Who are you? Where is this ship going? I want to meet the chief of this ship." One said: "I am the chief." He said: "We here are French people, English and Israeli." But I was seven days on this boat and only saw three people - the two men who were with me in the car and the woman who injected me. One was Israeli but we spoke in English. The other one was a Frenchman, not understanding English. I spoke to him a few words because I knew French. He had a scar on his left hand, maybe damaged in some activity or burnt. They didn't inject me any more. They even gave me a book I had in my bag, The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell. The ship took seven days to get back to Israel. In my view they didn't know what they were going to do. Maybe they were just sailing around, waiting to see if The Sunday Times would publish the article. I was also wondering what the paper would do. Were they going to publish it or not? I didn't know what would happen. Was this suffering going to be worth it? [The Sunday Times had no idea that he had been kidnapped. While Hounam tried repeatedly to contact him, the newspaper completed its checks on the story and decided to go ahead and publish.] On the Saturday night I felt the boat make a U-turn and get under way. Perhaps that was when The Sunday Times published the article, and they decided to bring me to Israel. We arrived at a beach, I think at Caesarea between Tel Aviv and Haifa - at least I saw the Roman wall there on the beach. Two officers of Shin Beth [the Israeli security service] came to the boat, handcuffed me and took me away by stretcher. They put me in a car, on the floor. The two men sat on the seats and started talking to me. One of them told me to thank God I was still alive. I don't know if he wanted to frighten me. They asked what The Sunday Times had given me. How much money had I received? (None.) Why had I become a Christian? I told them I didn't want to answer any questions without my lawyer. We drove straight from the beach to Ashkelon prison where I was taken before a Shin Beth investigator. After a few minutes he put The Sunday Times on the table and said: "Look what you did." The Sunday Times had at last published my revelations. At first I was very happy to see that I had succeeded. My mission was accomplished. Details would be in the papers all over the world. On the other hand, I knew they could take revenge against me. I was kept in a very secret part of the prison. Nobody knew about me. They kept me for five days in a small cell without windows, only a mattress and nothing else. They didn't let me go outside to walk or see the sky. The interrogation lasted only three days because I confirmed what I had done and why. I said I wanted to inform all the people of the Middle East, Arabs and Israelis, that Israel was producing nuclear weapons. I wanted them to know, and to prevent the future use of nuclear weapons. They brought a nuclear scientist with whom I had worked at Dimona. We sat down and I decided to tell him everything I had published in the hope that I would make it clear to them that these secrets were out. He wanted to know what else I had told The Sunday Times, and I told him everything. After one week in the prison I told the Shin Beth I wanted to meet a priest. That made them more angry and they started laughing and making me angry. I made it clear I was going to keep my Christianity. I asked for the Mezuzah [the religious symbol attached to the doorpost of Jewish homes] to be taken from my cell doorway. They did not let me meet a lawyer for two weeks, and it was about five weeks before a judge forced them to admit they had me in custody. Since the kidnapping nobody had known where I was. They had wanted to keep me under "administrative arrest", which would have meant they could keep me in silence for one or two years. Now that it was out in the open that I was in Israel, I was moved from Shin Beth's hands to the main prison. The Israeli public had no idea what had happened to me, so I decided to try to publicise my kidnapping. I wrote about it on my hand the first time I went to court, but then I thought there might be no journalists to see it so I erased it. It turned out that there were reporters there, so I wrote the message again on my next visit to court. On my palm I wrote that they had hijacked me in Rome, and on the underside of my fingers I wrote that Israel has plutonium, lithium, tritium, all the materials I told The Sunday Times about. But then I thought it was too much and would make them angry so I deleted it and left only the kidnapping message. The prison guard checked but didn't realise there was anything. When I came to the court I pressed my hand to the window of the prison van and the journalists were surprised. They didn't know what was going on.The manager of the prison got very upset. Before going to court I had asked him to give me a pen. So he thought I had used it to write the message. I told him I hadn't. The prison authorities became very angry. They decided that every time I was going to the court to put a helmet on my head, a crash helmet. They shackled my hands to guards. I thought I would die without air in the helmet. I raised this in the court to the judge many times, but he didn't support me. The first time I went to the court I had grown a beard. I then shaved, and they tried to get me to grow it again by not giving me a razor. They said I could use it to commit suicide, but it was really to force me to grow a beard. According to their psychology, if you grow a beard and cover your head you will become a rabbi. The people who saw me outside would think I was a Jewish man, a rabbi. YL: You spent such a large chunk of your life behind closed doors and the first 11 years in solitary confinement. How does one survive that? I was charged with aggravated espionage and high treason. I was very disappointed and angry. I was not a traitor; I did not go to any enemy with my information. I didn't receive orders from any spy organisation. I didn't work as a spy. So I felt they just wanted to take revenge and to punish me as much as they could. To move from being a free man, walking in the streets of London, to finding oneself in a cell is a huge fall - like falling from a very high building to the ground. You lose everything. But my case was also special. They put a lot of restrictions on me from the beginning. It was very hard to be alone - not to speak to anyone, to be under these restrictions. I decided I should do everything I could to keep my sanity. I told myself in the first days: "Whatever I do, I shall get out of this prison as strong in mind and body as I am now." I gave myself another mission target, which was to survive. I dealt with any problem I faced in this situation. For example, I saw in the first few days that I could not speak with anyone. So I decided that I could speak by reading. I used to take the Bible in English to read it in a loud voice, or I prayed in a loud voice, or I was singing, humming. I decided to continue learning English, to listen to the BBC. I received a radio and used to receive the BBC World Service. I was already a vegetarian and decided to continue with this: to eat eggs but not meat. Also doing exercises in my cell. Ashkelon prison had only Palestinian prisoners at that time. There were 600. I would walk in the courtyard when they were back in their cells. When I went through their sections to the courtyard I would see them in their cells and they would ask how I was. They used to leave me some tea and coffee and sent me some baklava each Ramadan. They gave it to the manager and the manager would bring it to me. So we established a very good relationship but we had no contact. Most of the time my aim was to be alert. I was afraid that I would be under psychological brainwashing - that they could change my mind, put some new idea, a little idea here or there. So for 24 hours a day I was alert for what was happening and suspecting anything. That was my way to survive. The cell was about two metres by three metres, with a shower place and toilet there. It was in a part of the prison where many guards were coming and going - a lot of noise every night. It was a very narrow, small cell without air. The air only came from the window into the corridor. It had no other window to let in fresh air. You had nothing to do every day, for 24 hours you were alone. You cannot go anywhere; you cannot come back. The first time you confront this situation is that you wake up in the morning at eight o'clock. You put on your clothes and shoes and you are not going anywhere. You are sitting on the bed eating your breakfast, and you realise your body cannot go. Your mind does not understand this situation; it takes a long time to cope. You are wearing your clothes and shoes and not going anywhere, just sitting on the bed trying to read. When I started a hunger strike it convinced the manager of the prison that I was going to commit suicide, so they wanted to protect me from myself by watching. They put a light on in my cell for 24 hours a day for two years. I could not sleep well with a light on all night and with a camera watching. After the light was turned off the games of the Shin Beth continued. It they wanted to disturb my sleeping, sometimes they sent a guard to check me every half hour - to come with a light to see if I was there, or if I had run away or would commit suicide. Disturbing sleep is one of the big ways of damaging the human mind. We presented many petitions to the court about these conditions but Israel continued to demand I be in solitary confinement. YL: Did you know your brother Meir was mounting an international campaign? Yes. I received a lot of support and mail and information from him and others telling me what was going on. But it was very difficult. All that mail and support is no substitute for freedom - to walk free or see flowers, or eat as a human being, to speak to a human being. After 11-1/2 years in solitary confinement your life is very difficult. You forget the past. Your brain is empty of all the images you have of the past. Watching only walls all day can damage the brain. I was very close to suffering damage to my senses, my reality. Shin Beth and Mossad use a lot of psychology, very sophisticated brainwashing to destroy a man and damage his mind. They even cause damage by food. They know you are alone and you have no substitute for freedom, so they send you a lot of food to eat. When you are alone in the cell you can satisfy your anger by eating a lot of bread, eggs, cheese, fat, chocolate. They send things that could destroy your health in the hope you get a heart attack or some other illness. I noticed all this. Everything was under my suspicion. I survived by questioning why they did this or said that. But in spite of all my attempts to fight back, the lack of open space and fresh air was damaging my health. So they decided they couldn't keep me like this for 18 years. After 11 years and two-thirds of my sentence, they decided I should be free to walk outside in the general prison area. That was my first feeling of freedom, freedom to go outside to see flowers, to see green and just to walk. Not just going round and round in the courtyard. Now I could go 200 metres with no one stopping me. That is a good feeling. To see the sky. Smell the air and hear the birds. See people walking. I was not yet free but my body had at least become free. The criminals were now there. I didn't have good contact with them because all of them were Jewish Zionists. When they are in prison those drug users and criminals become very patriotic, anti-Vanunu, anti-Arab. I had many arguments with them in the beginning. Later I decided it was not worth talking to them and I isolated myself from most of them. A few were very friendly and tried to support me. Two or three brought me food and things like that. I never imagined I would spend almost the whole sentence in prison. I always believed that next day, next month, next year I was going to be free. I didn't accept I was a spy sentenced to 18 years and I hoped that something would happen, that I would wake up and someone would say it is a mistake, you should be free. And each time I would continue to wait and wait. I imagined myself, my life in that cell, like a man in a station. He is waiting for a train to come to take him, and I was in this station waiting for that train of freedom to take me. Waiting, and I believed the train was coming - today, tomorrow, the next hour. And the train didn't come until the end of the sentence. When they told me it was 18 years I did not believe I would stay until 2004. In 1986, to think about 2004 is a very, very long time. The 'incriminating' notebooks that had lain in my cell for 13 years A month before Vanunu's release, notebooks were found in his cell in which he had written details of his work at Dimona. These are now being used as evidence that he has more secrets to reveal - hence the restrictions placed on him, banning him from talking to foreigners or going abroad. This is his explanation to Yael Lotan: Until June 1991 I used to pray and read in a loud voice every day and did a lot of exercise in the courtyard. I used to run for two hours, and then take a cold shower. In June 1991 I felt there was something wrong with my health. I really thought I was going to die from too much exercise and poor nutrition. I stopped reading out loud, changed from vegetarian to eating meat and everything, and I decided to check what was in my bare brain - what was going on in there, if it was still good or not. I decided I would sit down and write all I remembered about the Dimona reactor. For a month I wrote down all that I had worked on, full details in English. It was a mental exercise. I found that I still remembered a lot; my mind and brain worked very well. I then put the work aside, and it stayed in my cell. If they had checked the cell in 1992 or at any time they could have found it. So it stayed there until one month before my release when they checked the cell and took these notebooks. The restrictions on me now - I think they are stupid and not reasonable. I did what I did and it ended with the Sunday Times article. Since that article was published there are no more secrets. Much more important, it is 18 years since that happened. What Israel has been doing for the last 18 years is its problem, not mine. I have no more inner secrets. I think they should lift these restrictions and let me start my life abroad. I have no regets in spite of the fact I have paid a heavy punishment, a large price. ***************************************************************** 8 VANUNU INTERVIEW / SUNDAY TIMES Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 16:01:40 -0700 Free Mordechai Vanunu - Info & Action Alert #18 Vanunu Interview/Sunday Times ** PLEASE FORWARD TO SYMPATHETIC LISTS ** UPDATE 1. "VANUNU: MY STORY" SUNDAY TIMES INTERVIEW 2. HOUNAM'S STORY OF HIS ARREST 3. OTHER PRESS REPORTS 4. Write to Mordechai Vanunu ============== 1. "VANUNU: MY STORY" SUNDAY TIMES INTERVIEW Vanunu interview, Sunday Times (London) 30 May 04 Introduction Vanunu: the truth about my kidnap by Tom Walker FOR the first time since he was kidnapped by Israeli agents in 1986, Mordechai Vanunu has spoken out publicly about his abduction and 11 years in solitary confinement. Vanunu, in the only interview he has given since he vanished from London 18 years ago, explained why he fell for "Cindy", the Israeli undercover agent who lured him into a honey trap. He revealed that there was a Frenchman among his abductors; told how he was beaten and injected with drugs during his kidnapping; said he had no regrets for taking the wraps off Israel's secret nuclear arsenal and disclosed that he thought he was losing his mind in prison. "You forget the past. Your brain is empty of all the images you have of the past. Watching only walls all day can damage the brain," he said. Vanunu, who left prison last month after serving his full sentence for treason and aggravated espionage, gave the interview to an Israeli journalist as he is banned from speaking to foreigners. Last week Peter Hounam, the Sunday Times reporter who broke Vanunu's story and subsequently campaigned for his release, was arrested in Tel Aviv by Israeli security agents hunting for tapes of the interview. He was freed after the intervention of Vanunu's lawyers and the British ambassador. Vanunu has been unable to tell his story in his own words since September 1986 when he handed Hounam details and photographs of Israel's secret nuclear weapons plant, housed in a deep bunker at Dimona in the Negev desert. Israel has always refused to confirm that it has nuclear weapons. At the time, experts estimated that it had no more than 20 bombs. Vanunu, a former technician at Dimona, revealed that it had the production capacity for well over 100 atomic weapons and was able to make much more powerful thermonuclear bombs. He supplied details of the programme. It was while Vanunu was staying in London, as The Sunday Times checked his disclosures before publication, that "Cindy" caught his eye on a West End street. "She looked like a very nice woman, American, a little bit of a beauty, not tall or short, blonde hair," Vanunu told his interviewer. "After crossing the street she went in one direction and I went in another, but after 50 yards I asked myself if she was interested in me. Go and ask her what she wants, I said to myself. "I caught up with her and asked her, "Who are you and what are you doing?' We started talking." A close relationship developed: "She was good company and affectionate. She used to kiss me a lot - all the time." Cindy persuaded him to take a short holiday with her in Rome, where he was immediately ambushed and repeatedly injected with a drug - "I could walk and see, but I was not in control" - and shipped in chains to Israel. "One (of the guards) was Israeli but we spoke in English. The other one was a Frenchman, speaking in French, not understanding English. I spoke a few words to him because I knew French." He was landed clandestinely on an Israeli beach, strapped to a stretcher and taken to Ashkelon prison where he remained until last month. "To move from being a free man, walking in the streets of London, to finding oneself in a cell is a huge fall - like falling from a very high building to the ground. You lose everything," Vanunu recalled. Initially he was kept "in a very secret part of the prison. Nobody knew about me. They kept me for five days in a small cell without windows". When he was charged with aggravated espionage and high treason, "I was very angry. I was not a traitor; I did not go to any enemy with my information. I didn't work as a spy. I felt they just wanted to punish me". He said his motive was "not about betraying Israel; it was about saving Israel from a new holocaust. My point was to bring the subject to the public and to prevent any future war and make it very clear that war is not the way to solve problems." Vanunu was in solitary confinement for 11-1/2 years of his sentence: "I decided I should do everything I could to keep my sanity. I told myself in the first days: whatever I do, I shall get out of this prison as strong in mind and body as I am now. "I could not speak with anyone, so I decided that I could speak by reading. I used to take the Bible in English to read it in a loud voice, or I prayed in a loud voice, or I was singing, humming. Most of the time my aim was to be alert. I was afraid that I would be under psychological brainwashing - that they could change my mind, put some new idea, a little idea here or there." Vanunu's lawyers are to seek an urgent meeting with Israel's attorney-general to try to lift the ban on him leaving the country or meeting foreigners. They believe the government is in a dilemma about how to handle mounting concern about the restrictions after a week of heavy-handed actions by Shin Beth, the internal intelligence service. Vanunu's brother Meir said Israel had reached the point where a negotiated solution might now be considered. "He has no more secrets to reveal," Meir said. "He has given a detailed press interview with which the secret service can find no fault." Besides arresting Hounam and Saadi Haeri, a BBC editor, last week, Shin Beth also stopped Bishop Riah Abu El-Assal, head of the Anglican church in the Middle East, as he was entering Israel from Jordan on Friday. The bishop has allowed Vanunu to stay at St. George's Cathedral in Jerusalem. "They made me remove all my belongings, took me to a room and interrogated me for 90 minutes," El-Assal said yesterday. "They tried to persuade me to stop providing sanctuary to Mordechai." May 30, 2004 Leading article: Let Vanunu go free The details of the kidnapping and capture of Mordechai Vanunu in 1986 by Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, read more than ever like spy fiction. Mr. Vanunu, a former technician at Israel's Dimona nuclear centre, was in the process of revealing the secrets of his country's nuclear weapons programme to The Sunday Times when he was lured from London to Rome by "Cindy", an attractive blonde "American" working for Mossad. The honey trap was sprung and the courageous whistleblower was not to taste freedom for 18 long years. Now we at last know the details of Mr. Vanunu's abduction, they reveal the brutality with which he was treated. Once delivered by Cindy into the hands of Israeli goons, he was beaten and drugged repeatedly, well beyond the point where it became dangerous. His hands and feet were chained on the journey by ship to Israel. His arrest was kept secret from the outside world. That was just a foretaste of things to come. For 11 years of the 18 he spent in Israel's Ashkelon prison, he was held in solitary confinement for no seemingly good reason. Few of us can comprehend what 11 years alone in a cell measuring three metres by two could have been like. His own despairing descriptions, "You had nothing to do . . . you cannot go anywhere; you cannot come back", probably do not do it full justice. For two years the lights were kept on all day and all night, a camera monitoring his every movement. Even after that, guards would visit his cell every half-hour, keeping him awake so that he was driven to exhausted despair. The aim was clear. The Israeli authorities wanted to break him; they regarded him as an enemy of the state and believed (wrongly) that he had more secrets to reveal. He was, to his great credit, too strong to be broken. But Israel's paranoia has persisted, as we have seen from the absurdly restrictive terms of his release. He is out of prison but far from free, prohibited from going near airports, ports or foreign embassies. His telephone is tapped and he must seek permission before any contact with foreigners, whether journalists or not. According to Joseph Lapid, Israel's deputy prime minister, he remains a danger. "We think he still knows secrets and we don't want him to sell them again," he said this weekend. "We think there are things he knows that he hasn't divulged yet. He may do so - he's hell-bent to harm this country, he hates this country." This is nonsense. Mr. Vanunu did not wish to harm Israel. He wanted to prevent a nuclear holocaust in which he feared that Israel could be destroyed. And he has no more secrets. "I did what I did and it ended with the Sunday Times article (in 1986). Since it was published there are no more secrets. Much more important, it is 18 years since that happened. What Israel has been doing for the last 18 years is its problem, not mine," he says in his interview in News Review today. Israel will never accept that Mr. Vanunu did the world a favour by revealing the scale of Israel's nuclear programme. Instead what we are witnessing from the country's government is vindictiveness and unjustified paranoia. That suspicion extends to those who have contact with him. Last week Peter Hounam, a journalist for this newspaper, was seized by Shin Beth, the country's internal secret service, interrogated and held for 24 hours. This time they were in pursuit of what they believed to be a missing tape of an interview with Mr. Vanunu. There was, of course, no missing tape. Mr. Hounam is now back in London, shaken but little the worse for wear. Mr. Vanunu remains in Israel, bound by the terms of his release. He would like to leave for Europe or America to start a family and embark on a new career, possibly teaching. He does not intend to campaign against Israel or become a focus for anti-Israeli protest. But as long as he is forced to remain in Israel, his supporters will continue to protest and seek to embarrass the government. He has served his sentence. He should be allowed to enjoy genuine freedom. Israel has nothing to lose by it and much to gain by showing magnanimity THE INTERVIEW Vanunu: my story Eighteen years after he was kidnapped and jailed for revealing Israel's nuclear bomb to the world, Mordechai Vanunu has given his first interview, reliving the terror of his abduction and the anguish of solitary confinement, which he suffered for more than a decade. Under the terms of his release from prison, he spoke to an Israeli journalist, Yael Lotan, as he is barred from talking to foreigners. The former technician at Dimona, Israel's nuclear centre in the Negev desert, vividly remembers the events of September 1986, after he had given his story to The Sunday Times. Growing increasingly frustrated as the newspaper checked out his disclosures before publication, he feared that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, was closing in. Yet when the net was cast in a street in London's West End he fell into it. When I arrived in London I thought to myself: be careful, don't engage or try to find any woman. But after two or three weeks I got interested in one. It was a honey trap. She was standing at a place to buy cigarettes when I saw her. She looked like a very nice woman, American, a little bit of a beauty, not tall or short, blonde hair. We both walked on and came to a crossroads, where she stopped and I spoke to her. After crossing the street she went in one direction and I went in another, but after 50 yards I asked myself if she was interested in me. Go and ask her what she wants, I said to myself. I caught up with her and asked her: who are you and what are you doing? We started talking. I was suspicious, and I asked her if she was a Mossad spy. "Oh no, no," she replied. "What is Mossad?" She asked me my name. I said George, because that was the name I had registered under at the hotel - George Foresty. "Oh you're not George," she replied. So I told her who I really was and what I was doing in London. I felt it was not about betraying Israel; it was about saving Israel from a new holocaust, because if they used nuclear weapons then their enemies would retaliate. By publishing Israel's nuclear secrets, the fact that Israel has nuclear weapons, you are preventing them from using them, because all the world will know and no one will let them use them. My point was to bring the subject to the public, to open debate in Israel too, and to prevent any future war and make it very clear that war is not the way to solve problems - you have to solve the problem by peace. Cindy - that was her name - said she was a tourist from Philadelphia, 26 years old. She was working as a beautician, and her father was a writer and her mother also a writer. Her parents were divorced. When I told her about the delays by The Sunday Times she told me: "Come with me to New York, and I will help you with lawyers and good newspapers." We started meeting day after day. We went to the cinema and saw a film, Witness, about a child who saw a murder case, and we went to a play, 42nd Street. The Sunday Times knew I had found this woman. Peter Hounam, my main contact on the paper, told me many times: "Be careful, I don't trust her." Everyone was warning me, but I didn't understand why I should be suspicious of her. She was good company and affectionate. She used to kiss me a lot - all the time. So another Sunday came and The Sunday Times still didn't publish the story. Cindy said she was going to Rome to visit her sister, and she wanted me to go with her. I said no, but I changed my mind. I thought the Mossad was looking for me in London. If I went to Rome they would lose me, and I would come back to London after a few days. I decided not to tell Peter or the others on the newspaper. She bought the tickets. We met in Victoria station and from there we took a taxi to the airport. I was not suspicious, nothing at all. I never suspected her because I was sure that if they wanted to kidnap me or do something they could do it in London. At that time I didn't understand that Italy was an open state. During the cold war many people were kidnapped there, and there were many spy games there. London was a harder place for Israel to act. We landed in Rome, where she said her sister and a friend would meet us. Instead I saw an Italian with flowers coming towards us. We got into his car and he started driving us towards Rome very fast. We sat in the back. She diverted my attention with a lot of kissing until we reached a small house, not in Rome but maybe in a suburb. As I followed her into the house two people jumped on me. They were behind the door; I didn't see them. One hit me in the stomach and, as I bent over, they got me to the ground and shut my mouth. A woman injected me. Cindy had disappeared. I lost consciousness. I awoke on a large bed in my underwear. One man was on the left and the woman was on the other side trying to inject me. They couldn't find a vein. I pointed out the vein in the crook of my right arm. We didn't speak at all; I just pointed with my finger, no language. They injected me again. I passed out once more. When I awoke they gave me my clothes, but I was drugged. I could walk and see, but I was not in control. We left the house and returned to the car. I sat in the back between the two men. The woman who had injected me was in the front with the driver. Through the fog of the drug I decided that, when I woke up, I would try to cause some trouble. Maybe people who saw us fighting would try to stop the car. After 20 minutes or half an hour I could feel the drug wearing off. The car came to a small village. When the driver started slowing down I jumped on him and tried to stop the car by causing an accident.Immediately the two men jumped on me; one hit me in the stomach again. I started shouting for help but one of the men said in Hebrew to the woman: "Inject him twice." "It is very dangerous," she said. "Do it." She injected me and I passed out. I regained consciousness again when I felt the car driving over pebbles. The car stopped and I saw sea and a yacht, and a small commando boat coming towards us. It was night time. From the commando boat six Israeli soldiers appeared. They put me on a stretcher, took me to the commando boat and ferried me to the yacht. I heard someone shouting in Hebrew: "Put him in the deputy's cabin." In the morning I found myself chained by my hands and legs, and by another chain to the bed. When they brought me breakfast I told them to undo the chains so I could eat. They refused. I did not eat for 48 hours. After two days I started eating and asked them: "Who are you? Where is this ship going? I want to meet the chief of this ship." One said: "I am the chief." He said: "We here are French people, English and Israeli." But I was seven days on this boat and only saw three people - the two men who were with me in the car and the woman who injected me. One was Israeli but we spoke in English. The other one was a Frenchman, not understanding English. I spoke to him a few words because I knew French. He had a scar on his left hand, maybe damaged in some activity or burnt. They didn't inject me any more. They even gave me a book I had in my bag, The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell. The ship took seven days to get back to Israel. In my view they didn't know what they were going to do. Maybe they were just sailing around, waiting to see if The Sunday Times would publish the article. I was also wondering what the paper would do. Were they going to publish it or not? I didn't know what would happen. Was this suffering going to be worth it? [The Sunday Times had no idea that he had been kidnapped. While Hounam tried repeatedly to contact him, the newspaper completed its checks on the story and decided to go ahead and publish.] On the Saturday night I felt the boat make a U-turn and get under way. Perhaps that was when The Sunday Times published the article, and they decided to bring me to Israel. We arrived at a beach, I think at Caesarea between Tel Aviv and Haifa - at least I saw the Roman wall there on the beach. Two officers of Shin Beth [the Israeli security service] came to the boat, handcuffed me and took me away by stretcher. They put me in a car, on the floor. The two men sat on the seats and started talking to me. One of them told me to thank God I was still alive. I don't know if he wanted to frighten me. They asked what The Sunday Times had given me. How much money had I received? (None.) Why had I become a Christian? I told them I didn't want to answer any questions without my lawyer. We drove straight from the beach to Ashkelon prison where I was taken before a Shin Beth investigator. After a few minutes he put The Sunday Times on the table and said: "Look what you did." The Sunday Times had at last published my revelations. At first I was very happy to see that I had succeeded. My mission was accomplished. Details would be in the papers all over the world. On the other hand, I knew they could take revenge against me. I was kept in a very secret part of the prison. Nobody knew about me. They kept me for five days in a small cell without windows, only a mattress and nothing else. They didn't let me go outside to walk or see the sky. The interrogation lasted only three days because I confirmed what I had done and why. I said I wanted to inform all the people of the Middle East, Arabs and Israelis, that Israel was producing nuclear weapons. I wanted them to know, and to prevent the future use of nuclear weapons. They brought a nuclear scientist with whom I had worked at Dimona. We sat down and I decided to tell him everything I had published in the hope that I would make it clear to them that these secrets were out. He wanted to know what else I had told The Sunday Times, and I told him everything. After one week in the prison I told the Shin Beth I wanted to meet a priest. That made them more angry and they started laughing and making me angry. I made it clear I was going to keep my Christianity. I asked for the Mezuzah [the religious symbol attached to the doorpost of Jewish homes] to be taken from my cell doorway. They did not let me meet a lawyer for two weeks, and it was about five weeks before a judge forced them to admit they had me in custody. Since the kidnapping nobody had known where I was. They had wanted to keep me under "administrative arrest", which would have meant they could keep me in silence for one or two years. Now that it was out in the open that I was in Israel, I was moved from Shin Beth's hands to the main prison. The Israeli public had no idea what had happened to me, so I decided to try to publicise my kidnapping. I wrote about it on my hand the first time I went to court, but then I thought there might be no journalists to see it so I erased it. It turned out that there were reporters there, so I wrote the message again on my next visit to court. On my palm I wrote that they had hijacked me in Rome, and on the underside of my fingers I wrote that Israel has plutonium, lithium, tritium, all the materials I told The Sunday Times about. But then I thought it was too much and would make them angry so I deleted it and left only the kidnapping message. The prison guard checked but didn't realise there was anything. When I came to the court I pressed my hand to the window of the prison van and the journalists were surprised. They didn't know what was going on.The manager of the prison got very upset. Before going to court I had asked him to give me a pen. So he thought I had used it to write the message. I told him I hadn't. The prison authorities became very angry. They decided that every time I was going to the court to put a helmet on my head, a crash helmet. They shackled my hands to guards. I thought I would die without air in the helmet. I raised this in the court to the judge many times, but he didn't support me. The first time I went to the court I had grown a beard. I then shaved, and they tried to get me to grow it again by not giving me a razor. They said I could use it to commit suicide, but it was really to force me to grow a beard. According to their psychology, if you grow a beard and cover your head you will become a rabbi. The people who saw me outside would think I was a Jewish man, a rabbi. YL: You spent such a large chunk of your life behind closed doors and the first 11½ years in solitary confinement. How does one survive that? I was charged with aggravated espionage and high treason. I was very disappointed and angry. I was not a traitor; I did not go to any enemy with my information. I didn't receive orders from any spy organisation. I didn't work as a spy. So I felt they just wanted to take revenge and to punish me as much as they could. To move from being a free man, walking in the streets of London, to finding oneself in a cell is a huge fall - like falling from a very high building to the ground. You lose everything. But my case was also special. They put a lot of restrictions on me from the beginning. It was very hard to be alone - not to speak to anyone, to be under these restrictions. I decided I should do everything I could to keep my sanity. I told myself in the first days: "Whatever I do, I shall get out of this prison as strong in mind and body as I am now." I gave myself another mission target, which was to survive. I dealt with any problem I faced in this situation. For example, I saw in the first few days that I could not speak with anyone. So I decided that I could speak by reading. I used to take the Bible in English to read it in a loud voice, or I prayed in a loud voice, or I was singing, humming. I decided to continue learning English, to listen to the BBC. I received a radio and used to receive the BBC World Service. I was already a vegetarian and decided to continue with this: to eat eggs but not meat. Also doing exercises in my cell. Ashkelon prison had only Palestinian prisoners at that time. There were 600. I would walk in the courtyard when they were back in their cells. When I went through their sections to the courtyard I would see them in their cells and they would ask how I was. They used to leave me some tea and coffee and sent me some baklava each Ramadan. They gave it to the manager and the manager would bring it to me. So we established a very good relationship but we had no contact. Most of the time my aim was to be alert. I was afraid that I would be under psychological brainwashing - that they could change my mind, put some new idea, a little idea here or there. So for 24 hours a day I was alert for what was happening and suspecting anything. That was my way to survive. The cell was about two metres by three metres, with a shower place and toilet there. It was in a part of the prison where many guards were coming and going - a lot of noise every night. It was a very narrow, small cell without air. The air only came from the window into the corridor. It had no other window to let in fresh air. You had nothing to do every day, for 24 hours you were alone. You cannot go anywhere; you cannot come back. The first time you confront this situation is that you wake up in the morning at eight o'clock. You put on your clothes and shoes and you are not going anywhere. You are sitting on the bed eating your breakfast, and you realise your body cannot go. Your mind does not understand this situation; it takes a long time to cope. You are wearing your clothes and shoes and not going anywhere, just sitting on the bed trying to read. When I started a hunger strike it convinced the manager of the prison that I was going to commit suicide, so they wanted to protect me from myself by watching. They put a light on in my cell for 24 hours a day for two years. I could not sleep well with a light on all night and with a camera watching. After the light was turned off the games of the Shin Beth continued. It they wanted to disturb my sleeping, sometimes they sent a guard to check me every half hour - to come with a light to see if I was there, or if I had run away or would commit suicide. Disturbing sleep is one of the big ways of damaging the human mind. We presented many petitions to the court about these conditions but Israel continued to demand I be in solitary confinement. YL: Did you know your brother Meir was mounting an international campaign? Yes. I received a lot of support and mail and information from him and others telling me what was going on. But it was very difficult. All that mail and support is no substitute for freedom - to walk free or see flowers, or eat as a human being, to speak to a human being. After 11-1/2 years in solitary confinement your life is very difficult. You forget the past. Your brain is empty of all the images you have of the past. Watching only walls all day can damage the brain. I was very close to suffering damage to my senses, my reality. Shin Beth and Mossad use a lot of psychology, very sophisticated brainwashing to destroy a man and damage his mind. They even cause damage by food. They know you are alone and you have no substitute for freedom, so they send you a lot of food to eat. When you are alone in the cell you can satisfy your anger by eating a lot of bread, eggs, cheese, fat, chocolate. They send things that could destroy your health in the hope you get a heart attack or some other illness. I noticed all this. Everything was under my suspicion. I survived by questioning why they did this or said that. But in spite of all my attempts to fight back, the lack of open space and fresh air was damaging my health. So they decided they couldn't keep me like this for 18 years. After 11½ years and two-thirds of my sentence, they decided I should be free to walk outside in the general prison area. That was my first feeling of freedom, freedom to go outside to see flowers, to see green and just to walk. Not just going round and round in the courtyard. Now I could go 200 metres with no one stopping me. That is a good feeling. To see the sky. Smell the air and hear the birds. See people walking. I was not yet free but my body had at least become free. The criminals were now there. I didn't have good contact with them because all of them were Jewish Zionists. When they are in prison those drug users and criminals become very patriotic, anti-Vanunu, anti-Arab. I had many arguments with them in the beginning. Later I decided it was not worth talking to them and I isolated myself from most of them. A few were very friendly and tried to support me. Two or three brought me food and things like that. I never imagined I would spend almost the whole sentence in prison. I always believed that next day, next month, next year I was going to be free. I didn't accept I was a spy sentenced to 18 years and I hoped that something would happen, that I would wake up and someone would say it is a mistake, you should be free. And each time I would continue to wait and wait. I imagined myself, my life in that cell, like a man in a station. He is waiting for a train to come to take him, and I was in this station waiting for that train of freedom to take me. Waiting, and I believed the train was coming - today, tomorrow, the next hour. And the train didn't come until the end of the sentence. When they told me it was 18 years I did not believe I would stay until 2004. In 1986, to think about 2004 is a very, very long time. The 'incriminating' notebooks that had lain in my cell for 13 years A month before Vanunu's release, notebooks were found in his cell in which he had written details of his work at Dimona. These are now being used as evidence that he has more secrets to reveal - hence the restrictions placed on him, banning him from talking to foreigners or going abroad. This is his explanation to Yael Lotan: Until June 1991 I used to pray and read in a loud voice every day and did a lot of exercise in the courtyard. I used to run for two hours, and then take a cold shower. In June 1991 I felt there was something wrong with my health. I really thought I was going to die from too much exercise and poor nutrition. I stopped reading out loud, changed from vegetarian to eating meat and everything, and I decided to check what was in my bare brain - what was going on in there, if it was still good or not. I decided I would sit down and write all I remembered about the Dimona reactor. For a month I wrote down all that I had worked on, full details in English. It was a mental exercise. I found that I still remembered a lot; my mind and brain worked very well. I then put the work aside, and it stayed in my cell. If they had checked the cell in 1992 or at any time they could have found it. So it stayed there until one month before my release when they checked the cell and took these notebooks. The restrictions on me now - I think they are stupid and not reasonable. I did what I did and it ended with the Sunday Times article. Since that article was published there are no more secrets. Much more important, it is 18 years since that happened. What Israel has been doing for the last 18 years is its problem, not mine. I have no more inner secrets. I think they should lift these restrictions and let me start my life abroad. I have no regets in spite of the fact I have paid a heavy punishment, a large price. 2. HOUNAM'S STORY OF HIS ARREST Snatched ... just like Mordechai When Israeli security struck after the Vanunu interview, Peter Hounam got a short, terrifying taste of what his subject had been through. It was meant to be a relaxed evening at a small fish restaurant near the Tel Aviv beachfront with Yael Lotan, the Israeli journalist who had interviewed Mordechai Vanunu. I drove there from Jerusalem and headed into the suburb of Givatayim to pick Yael up. In Katznelson Street, close to her apartment, a small white car pulled out of a parking space and blocked my path. Another blocked the rear. My door was wrenched open, an arm reached across and turned off the ignition, and a tough looking man wearing a police cap pulled me out of my seat into the road. "You are under arrest," he said. "Please do not resist. We are police. Go over to the pavement." For weeks I had prepared myself for trouble with Israel's feared security apparatus. My relationship with Vanunu was of great concern to Shin Beth, the internal secret service. As I watched plainclothes officers remove my two bags, containing tapes, notebooks and my laptop, I realised I was in for a rough time. At all cost I had to make sure Mordechai would not be placed in jeopardy in the forthcoming interrogation. I was pushed into the back of a Toyota and told I was being taken to my hotel in Jerusalem and then to a police station. The journey was hair-raising, the driver overtaking on the wrong side at 90 mph. He was even trying to send a text message at high speed. He put the phone away when I shouted at him, and slowed down a little. My fear now was that nobody would know I had been arrested. Yael would realise something was wrong, but I had to find a way of telling somebody quickly. When we reached the Jerusalem hotel, in the Arab east part of the city, the restaurant tables outside were packed with diners. As I was escorted inside by officers in jeans and T-shirts, I saw Donatella Rovera, Amnesty International's Middle East representative. I rushed over and grabbed her arm. "Tell The Sunday Times I have been arrested," I yelled as I was dragged away. The police were furious. One said: "Mr. Hounam, that was not a very good idea. If we have more trouble, we will use handcuffs." In my room a thorough search began. One of the policemen loaded all my papers into carrier bags. I asked if I could take a book or a newspaper with me. A cop looked at me menacingly and said: "Believe me, Mr. Hounam, where you are going, you will not have time to read a newspaper." We returned to the car for the short journey to Jerusalem's central police station in the Russian compound, a huge complex of decrepit buildings built during the British mandate years. I was escorted up some steps, along a corridor and into a room that was locked behind us. I realised this was the special police section, equivalent to Britain's Special Branch. Its role is to work with the secret service. I watched as, one by one, my belongings were taken to an adjacent room. I could hear the police searching, and they got annoyed when I poked my head round the door. "Sit down, Mr. Hounam," one said quietly. "We will deal with you shortly." I surprised myself that I was so calm. I had time to reflect that I had been expecting something like this to happen ever since 1986, when I first went to Israel after Vanunu's disappearance. He had been jailed for 18 years for the most serious of offences, aggravated espionage and treason, and I was his accomplice as the reporter who put his story in The Sunday Times. Yet nothing had happened to me in dozens of visits over the years, until now. After waiting for more than an hour, I was eventually told to stand up and hold out my hands. Handcuffs were slammed on my wrists. Feeling like a dangerous criminal, I was marched out of the building and into the car for a short ride through an arch into another part of the complex. At a sordid glass booth with two guards inside, I was told to stand in front of a home video camera. "Look straight at it," barked a tall guard who came up beside me, the first to show real aggression. Into a bag went my wallet, comb, pen, watch and belt. A guard pointed to my shoes and off came my shoelaces. After a phone call to higher authority, I was allowed to keep my glasses. Another guard, smiling in a rather apologetic way, led me along another corridor, through a locked door and into a tiny waiting area. The next step was completely unexpected. He opened a cupboard and took out a battered pair of scuba-diving goggles. The glass lenses had been removed and replaced by black plastic. These were put over my eyes and I entered total darkness. With one guard tugging and another pushing, I was shuffled along a network of corridors. Doors were unlocked and I was pushed through. "Take it off please," said a voice. What a contrast. I was in a beautifully furnished office, with concealed lighting, two flat screen computer terminals and two elegantly curved desks, devoid of any paperwork. Sitting behind them were two of the men I had seen in my hotel room. "Sit down please, Mr. Hounam," said one. "Do you know why you are here?" I said it was probably to do with Mordechai Vanunu. "Of course, you are right," he said. "You are no longer in a police station, you are in the hands of Shabak, also known as Shin Beth. We call it the Internal Security Service. You have been arrested for 24 hours but we can continue to keep you by going to court. You will not be able to see a lawyer for four days. That is the rule." He went on: "Of course, you know it is about Vanunu, but you must also know that we are looking into an interview we believe you arranged with him for the BBC. We want to know why you did this. In fact, we want to know everything you have been doing recently." No surprise there. When I came to Israel last month to report Vanunu's release for The Sunday Times I was also helping make a BBC documentary about him. My aim in the weeks after his release was to get an exclusive interview with him for this newspaper and film it for the BBC. Restrictions imposed by the ever-obsessive security authorities banned him from speaking to foreigners but permitted him to be interviewed by any Israeli. I was of the firm belief, as was Vanunu, that an interview would help to highlight the ridiculousness of the restrictions, and show those in the Israeli government who had displayed a degree of common sense about the issue - notably the attorney-general, Menahem Mazuz - that they were pointless and repressive. With this in mind, the interview took place last weekend in St. George's Cathedral, Jerusalem, where Vanunu has been staying since his release. Yael Lotan conducted it with an Israeli film crew. I sat well out of the way, as did the BBC producer, Chris Mitchell. The essential rule was that neither of us must communicate with Vanunu. There was a hitch, however. Preparing to fly home last Sunday, Mitchell was stopped at Tel Aviv airport. All the video cassettes were seized, and his mobile phone. A further worrying development happened on the morning of my arrest. Outside St. George's Cathedral I bumped into the man editing the BBC documentary, Saadi Haeri. He was clearly in Israel incognito, perhaps to help take out duplicate copies of the interview. He followed me into a nearby hotel and we exchanged a few words. I had in my pocket a single video cassette of an interview with Vanunu's brother, Meir, and I gave it to him. We then parted. As the Shin Beth interrogators took it in turns to grill me, it became clear that Saadi had been picked up and forced to give up at least some video cassettes. A massive surveillance operation had been conducted and they believed I had other cassettes, or knew where they were. The lead interrogator was tall, tough and middle-aged with receding grey hair. He told me to call him Ifftakh, clearly not his real name. He was not friendly. "Mr. Hounam," he said. "We know you are lying to us. We know you can lead us to more tapes. We know you have been hiding tapes. You will remain here until you tell us where they are." Needing more time to think, I asked to take a lavatory break. On went the goggles and I was shuffled away. With the goggles removed I found myself staring at a filthy hole in the ground. The walls were grimy and covered in graffiti. Back in the interrogation room the relentless questioning continued. I told them they had made a huge error, one of many that simply served to highlight the travesty of Vanunu's treatment. I rather foolishly said: "You know, you should keep me for several days, because the story is only going to get bigger every day. I am not a helpless Palestinian with no friends in the outside world. The Sunday Times will be in action, so will the British government (I hoped). It will be a story all over the world." They both got really angry. "Are you threatening us?" they yelled. It was such an absurd response that I could only laugh. "Why don't we all go home?" I said. One of them did just that, leaving Ifftakh to try to break me. It was about 3 am. By now I was taking frequent lavatory breaks, using the time as I shuffled around blindly to gather my thoughts. It was then that I realised my captors had made a stupid but understandable mistake. During the questioning, it emerged that on the tapes seized from Mitchell they had noticed a break in the recording at a point where Vanunu had spoken briefly, but legally, about his work at the Dimona nuclear weapons plant. The Shabak had jumped to the conclusion that there was a missing section of the interview, no doubt packed with secrets. Putting two and two together and making five, Shabak had deduced that Hounam had the missing tape. I had been seen handing Saadi a tape but this had proved to be the wrong one. So where was the real one? I could easily prove they were wrong. In the bags they had seized from me were two audio cassettes of the interview. I scornfully pointed out to Ifftakh that by comparing this soundtrack with the videos he could hear there was nothing missing. You could see the penny dropping when I explained that the discontinuity in the video was because the crew had stopped recording when Vanunu began to talk about visiting a sensitive room at Dimona. The tapes had been wound back and the offending section recorded over. The mood eased. Ifftakh began asking if I could recommend any good restaurants in London. He said he would retire soon and write a book about his experiences in Shabak. "Why not do it now? I could get a lot of money from The Sunday Times," I joked. Ifftakh was getting tired. It was 4:40 am but I was happy to go on. In a way I had begun to like him. "You seem a nice guy," I said. "How can you do such a dreadful job?" "Sometimes we have to do things we don't like," he replied, almost ruefully. "We'll continue tomorrow morning." On went the goggles again and I was shuffled away. When they were removed I was pushed gently into a cell, part of a warren of squalid dungeons. There was a lavatory hole in one corner and a sink that emptied into it, a crude form of flush. Previous occupants had scrawled on the walls with whatever came to hand, including blood, faeces, yoghurt and semen. There were blankets and two foam mats on the floor, no windows, but two bright lights burnt continually. This was my bleakest moment. Was I right to hope this might be over in just a day or two? I lay down and pulled a few blankets over me. I was completely unconscious when at 6 am I was aroused by a guard. Breakfast came: a small plastic bag containing a boiled egg, four baby tomatoes like they sell at Sainsbury's, four slices of inedible bread and a small pot of yoghurt. I had the egg and tomatoes. Until late in the morning I had nothing to do but to sit and reflect. I'm in solitary confinement, I thought, just like Mordechai. But he was caged like this for 11½ years. My solitude only lasted for five hours. Yet in no time I was bored, nothing to read and dark walls and filth all around me. At about 11:30 am the goggles came back on and I was pushed along to another room, this time tiny and shabby. Sitting behind a desk, wearing a skullcap, was Sergeant David Nitzan, who said he was there to take a statement from me on Shabak's behalf. He wrote down that I was suspected of "spying on Israeli nuclear secrets, and also serious spying on Israeli nuclear secrets". This sounded serious, the equivalent of the "aggravated espionage" that earned Vanunu his sentence. Nitzan, however, turned out to be a cheery chap as he wrote answers to a series of questions that the Shabak had given him. At the end, I had to remind him that he hadn't asked me about the missing tape. He was grateful and I duly dictated a denial that one existed. At around 3 pm one of my interrogators popped his head round the door and, looking rather sheepish, said the British consulate had come to see me. In came Valentine Madoojemu, vice-consul, and Sam Bayyuk, pro-consul. They said that the British ambassador had been furious and had insisted on consular access after it had been initially denied. The Israeli press had also gone berserk on the story, accusing Shabak of making a huge mistake. My description of my filthy cell was so graphic that the vice-consul promised to insist on better conditions. An hour later I was shifted to an almost identical cell with less muck on the walls. A nice guard brought me a bucket of soapy water and a squeegee and politely suggested I wash the floor. I was also brought a towel and prison issue socks, vest and underpants, all ludicrously too small. Now Avigdor Feldman and Mikhal Sfard, two of Vanunu's lawyers, arrived. They had moved mountains to overturn the ban on my seeing them. Beaming, they explained that the Ministry of Justice had been hugely embarrassed by my arrest and wanted a way out. There was no question of deportation. I was simply asked if I was willing to leave the country in 24 hours. I agreed, as I had been intending to leave by today anyway. The Shabak agreed to return all my seized belongings once they had been checked; but my belt, shoelaces, watch, wallet and other bits and pieces were restored straight away. At 8 pm I walked out of the jail a free man. I was no longer a "serious spy". -END- ============= 3. OTHER PRESS REPORTS The Independent Israel attacks BBC 'tricks' in taping Vanunu Whistleblower insists he revealed secrets to prevent 'second holocaust' By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem 30 May 2004 The Israeli authorities' frequently tense relationship with the BBC will take a turn for the worse this week when they complain about the methods used to broadcast a taped interview with nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu. The Foreign Ministry is expected to seek a meeting with the BBC's Middle East bureau chief, Andrew Steele, to discuss the circumstances in which the tape of the interview was smuggled out of the country despite demands that all copies be handed over to the Israeli censor. Peter Hounam, the journalist who first broke the story in 1986 of Mr. Vanunu's revelations of Israel's nuclear weapons programme and who has been making a documentary on him for the BBC, was ordered to leave the country last week after being held for 24 hours by Shin Bet, the domestic intelligence agency. Shin Bet conspicuously failed to find all the tapes, despite their interrogation of Mr. Hounam and the separate detentions of two members of the team from the Magnetic North independent production company, Chris Mitchell and a freelance editor, Sadi Haeri. The interview was carried out on behalf of the team and The Sunday Times by Yael Lotan, an Israeli supporter of Mr. Vanunu, who was released last month from jail after serving an 18-year sentence. The restrictions attached to Mr. Vanunu's release expressly preclude him from meeting foreigners without prior permission. The BBC repeatedly trailed the interview, conducted eight days ago, on its news bulletins yesterday. A senior government source in Jerusalem said there could be "repercussions" for relations between the BBC and the Israeli government. The source added that the government wanted to express its "disappointment" that the BBC had appeared prepared to "trick" Israel by bypassing restrictions, including those on Mr. Vanunu after his release. In his interview Mr. Vanunu appears to say nothing new of relevance to Israel's present security. He strongly denies that he betrayed the country and says that he exposed Israel's nuclear secrets because he wanted to prevent the second holocaust that might occur as a result of a nuclear war. He also reveals that "Cindy", the Mossad agent who lured him from London to Rome where he was seized, had kissed him throughout the car journey from Rome's airport to distract him from the trap he was falling into. He says he had suspected she might be a Mossad agent but that she appeared not to know what he was talking about when he challenged her. He adds: "I'm not interested in living in Israel. I want to start my new life in the United States or Europe." Shin Bet, which says that Mr. Vanunu breached his restrictions by meeting Mr. Hounam, is still deciding whether to take action against him. - END - Ma'ariv English website, May 31, 2004 Vanunu: I just wanted to let world know In first interview after release, nuclear spy says he was disappointed after being accused of treason. Shaul Adar, Britain Advertisement In his first interview since being released from Prison, nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu said he was disappointed and upset over being accused of committing treason. "I felt they just wanted to get their revenge on me", said Vanunu during the interview with the BBC, adding that he wanted to save the State of Israel from another holocaust. Vanunu also noted that he didn't feel his actions were treason, but rather a report, claiming he wanted to inform the world about what Israel was secretly doing. "I didn't come and say that Israel or Dimona [site of nuclear reactor] should be destroyed, I just told the world: 'look at what they're doing and judge for yourself'", added Vanunu. In the interview, Vanunu also described his meeting with "Cindy", the Mossad agent who enticed him to go to Rome, where he was abducted by Israel in 1986. Vanunu said Cindy was warm and friendly and used to kiss him "all the time". Regarding his abduction, Vanunu related how he was jumped by two people once he entered the house in Rome. Subsequently, a woman injected him with an unknown substance, while Cindy disappeared. Vanunu said he became unconscious and later woke up on a large bed, before being taken out of the house and into a waiting car. One of the most well-known photographs in Israel's history is the picture of Vanunu displaying details of his abduction by pressing his palm against the window of a police van. In the interview, Vanunu says that initially he also wrote down the nuclear materials Israel possessed, but subsequently erased it. Talking about his time in detention, Vanunu said that the Israel Security Agency and the Mossad used psychological means and sophisticated brainwashing techniques to break his spirit. Vanunu says security authorities tried to harm him by using certain foods, claiming that he was given bread, eggs, cheeses and chocolate in the hopes that he suffer a heart-attack or other diseases. In conclusion, Vanunu declared that he does not regret his actions, despite the severe punishment imposed on him. The nuclear spy stressed that he does not want to live in Israel any longer and is interested in starting a new life in the US or in Europe. -END- ============= 4. Write to Mordechai Vanunu Mordechai would love to hear from his friends and supporters. You can write to him at: Mordechai Vanunu c/o Cathedral Church of St. George 20 Nablus Road PO Box 19018 Jerusalem 91190 Israel The U.S. Campaign to Free Mordechai Vanunu would appreciate any news clippings about the release for our files. Please send to the campaign at PO Box 43384, Tucson, AZ 85733 US. Also, if anyone taped any of the TV or radio coverage, we would appreciate a copy. Thanks! ================= If you would like to receive these alerts directly, please subscribe by sending a blank e-mail to free_vanunu-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - END - Felice Cohen-Joppa Coordinator U.S. Campaign to Free Mordechai Vanunu POB 43384 Tucson, AZ 85733 Phone/Fax 520-323-8697 freevanunu@mindspring.com www.nonviolence.org/vanunu ***************************************************************** 9 Las Vegas SUN: Partition Bonds India, Pakistan Leaders By PATRICK McDOWELL ASSOCIATED PRESS GAH, Pakistan (AP) - Lost among timeless farmlands, the Pakistani village of Gah was a dusty backwater until a few days ago, when the tortuous path to peace with India suddenly took a detour through it. Carefully turning the tattered pages of the three-room school's enrollment book, teacher Ghulam Mustafa finds the name Manmohan Singh, born in Gah in 1932, enrolled as a pupil in 1937 - the same Manmohan Singh who was sworn in May 22 as prime minister of India. With Singh's accession, India and Pakistan for the first time are both ruled by men born in what is now enemy territory - opposite sides of the line that divided their adopted countries amid massive bloodshed when Britain granted independence in 1947. Now millions are hoping that Singh and Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf - who was born in the ancient Muslim quarters of New Delhi - can draw on their histories as children of the partition to lift the permanent threat of war that has been worsened in recent years by nuclear weapons. "The leaders of both countries want the situation to improve," said Sher Mazan, 55, a senior Pakistani Foreign Office official from Gah who frequently visits his family and owns some of the village's best farmland. "Manmohan Singh belongs to this area, so there will be different considerations about Pakistan," Mazan said. "Definitely, it will make a difference that he was born here. In our part of the world, we always take care of the place we were born." Gah's 2,000 villagers are farmers and small tradesmen in turbans and baggy pants. Even though the village has electricity, it is a long way from Oxford University, where Singh studied economics, or the Finance Ministry, where he launched India on the road to free-market reforms in the early 1990s. Singh, 71, was 14 when he left with his family, and he has not been back. Musharraf, the 60-year-old general-turned-president of Pakistan, left New Delhi when he was 4 and did not revisit the ancestral home until three years ago. Ahmed Khan, a 73-year-old barber, is one of the few still alive who went to school with Singh, in an era when Gah's population was equally divided among Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims. "I played at his house, on the grounds," Khan recalls. "He was a really good student, yes, but I remember him being very strong. He used to beat us in fights." The house where Singh lived with his family - wealthy Sikh landlords who also ran a dried fruit business - is now only a pile of stones near a well, overlooking terraced wheat fields. The Hindu and Sikh owners of the neighboring homes fled to India decades ago and the Muslims moved in. Gah is in Pakistan's Punjab province - part of a princely state split by partition, with the rest in India. The village was a microcosm of partition's human price. Villagers recall Muslim outsiders massacring two dozen Hindus after hearing Hindus somewhere were killing Muslims. Refugee Muslims were later settled here with government land grants, but they soon sold out and moved to the city. Overall, some 10 million to 12 million people were uprooted and an estimated 1 million were killed. Bitterness was reinforced by three wars and the division of Kashmir, the Himalayan territory both countries claim in its entirety. Both Musharraf and Singh are stressing good will. They spoke for 20 minutes by phone Sunday and said they want to keep talking. The sense of urgency is strongest in Kashmir, where a separatist insurgency launched in 1989 has claimed some 65,000 lives and morphed into a front of Islamic extremist holy war in the Indian-ruled portion. On the day Singh and Musharraf spoke by phone, a land mine in Kashmir killed 29 people in a bus. Singh and Musharraf "know what broken homes mean," said Sheikh A. Qayom, an analyst based in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian-held Kashmir. "Certainly, this will make them more sensitive to Kashmir's split and therefore they can address the matter more effectively." Urvashi Butalia, author of the book "The Other Side of Silence - Voices from the Partition of India," says the trauma of the partition has received little official recognition. "Sometimes there's a fear of addressing the dark side," said Butalia, a child of Sikh-Hindu parents who left Pakistan. "There is this tremendous need to reconnect and then put closure to it." In Gah, villagers think closure could start with a party and a visit by India's new prime minister to his birthplace. The villagers hope they might get a new well out of the deal. They promise to decorate the mud-brick walls and throw a big feast. "If they belong to this place, and they want to come back, the Hindus and Sikhs can," said Shah Nawaz, 65. "Manmohan Singh should come back and build his house here." --- Associated Press reporter Beth Duff-Brown in New Delhi contributed to this report. -- ***************************************************************** 10 BBC: Europe's energy use still rising Last Updated: Tuesday, 1 June, 2004 By Alex Kirby BBC News Online environment correspondent [Matterhorn at dawn AP] Glacier loss proves climate change is increasing, the EEA says The countries of Europe are not keeping their promises on the environment, the European Environment Agency believes. The agency, a European Union body, says the latest trends show growing evidence of climate change, on land and at sea. It says there are also worrying levels of urban air pollution and agricultural contamination of water, and increasing amounts of packaging and other waste. The agency calls in its report, EEA Signals 2004, for more use of market-based instruments to change behaviour. Hard choices The report says the evidence of climate change comes from receding glaciers, disturbance of marine species, and rising energy consumption. It says ways to tackle this include increasing energy efficiency, greater use of renewable energy, and "rethinking options for transport" - something for which politicians in many countries have shown little stomach. [Dustmen and lorry PA] Europe's waste problem will become unmanageable, the agency thinks The report says the number of weather- and climate-related disasters in Europe during the 1990s was double the figure of the previous decade. It says their average cost "is conservatively estimated at around 10bn euros (£6.7bn) per year and rising". The agency's executive director, Professor Jacqueline McGlade, said: "Such figures suggest that managing Europe's natural resources is increasingly important for ensuring the viability of Europe's economic and social capital. Wasted expenditure "This is money that could otherwise be spent in productive ways, for example to promote competitiveness and innovation, which are defining conditions for delivering sustainable economic growth." Other findings in the report include: + nitrate pollution from farming is continuing, and there is evidence that consumers are paying most of the clean-up costs for drinking water + much of the continent's urban population is still exposed to air pollution above health protection levels, with low-level ozone and particulates the main concerns + the area of built-up land is growing much faster than the population + packaging waste is rising, and is projected to continue doing so; "overall trends in waste generation are unsustainable and current policy tools inadequate". Professor McGlade said the report showed the need for more progress in managing the environmental impacts of agriculture, transport and energy in particular, and for influencing the behaviour of consumers. She urged a greater use of market-based instruments to manage demand and incorporate "external" costs into prices, and said environmentally-targeted subsidies and innovation were also important. The EEA's 31 members are the 25 EU states, the three EU candidate countries - Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey - and Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Membership negotiations are under way with Switzerland. ***************************************************************** 11 Haaretz: Vanunu: Exposing Israel's nuclear secrets was not betrayal [http://www.haaretz.com] News Updates Mon., May 31, 2004 Sivan 11, 5764 Israel By Haaretz Service In his first interview since his release last month after 18 years in jail for revealing Israel's nuclear secrets to a British newspaper, Mordechai Vanunu told the BBC in an interview aired Sunday night that he did not feel he was a traitor to the country. "I felt it was not about betraying; it was about reporting. It was about saving Israel from a new holocaust," he said. Speaking to the BBC's This World program, Vanunu said he had "no regrets despite the fact I have paid a heavy punishment, a large price." "What I did was to inform the world what is going on in secret," he said. "I didn't come and say, we should destroy Israel, we should destroy Dimona. I said, look what they have and make your judgement." The interview sparked controversy in Israel ahead of its airing, when the British journalist making the program, Peter Hounam, was arrested by the Shin Bet security service last week, on suspicion of violating Vanunu's terms of release, which include a ban on meetings with foreigners. The interview was facilitated by an Israeli, Yael Lotan, thereby bypassing the ban. In the interview, Vanunu reiterated his desire to leave Israel, which was also banned. "I want to leave Israel, I'm not interested in living in Israel," he said. "I want to start my new life in the United States, or somewhere in Europe, and to start living as a human being." Days before his 1986 expose of Israel's nuclear capability appeared in the Sunday Times, Vanunu was seized by Israeli agents from an apartment in Italy, where he had been lured by a female agent nicknamed "Cindy." Vanunu described to the BBC how she brought him from London to Rome and distracted him en route. "We sat in the back [of the car]. She used the time for kissing me, to divert my attention by a lot of kissing," he said. The BBC program also included comments by Justice Minister Yosef Lapid, who argued that Vanunu still posed a threat to Israel's security. "We think he still knows secrets and we don't want him to sell them again," he told This World. "We think there are things he knows that he hasn't divulged yet. He may do so - he's hell-bent to harm this country, he hates this country." Mordechai Vanunu giving the victory sign as he leaves Ashkelon jail last month. (AP) [feedback@haaretz.co.il] © Copyright Haaretz. All rights reserved ***************************************************************** 12 Seychelles NATION: Assembly paves way for peaceful use of nuclear material [http://www.seychelles.net Members of the National Assembly gave their stamp of approval to allow Seychelles to make use of nuclear technology materials for peaceful purposes after they endorsed the ratification of a nuclear arms non-proliferation treaty. Ratification means Seychelles could pursue technology used for radio-active treatment for cancer patients. The motion in last Tuesday’s assembly, which called for the ratification of the Agreement for the Application of Safeguards in connection with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and Protocols, was presented by the Leader of Government Business Patrick Herminie. The protocol being ratified, he said, allowed countries which are not nuclear powers to have access to materials that can be used for various purposes condoned under the main treaty, such as for electricity, medical use, food security or mine detection. The protocol itself has three main components, including material accountancy, containment and surveillance. Material accountancy, Mr Herminie said, regulated the quantity of plutonium and uranium to be used by a non-nuclear power in its projects. The country concerned has to give precise information to other member states about the project in question and disclose means of getting rid of excess materials. This aspect of the treaty, he said, was important to ensure strict monitoring so that the materials did not end up in the hands of rogue nations or terrorists organisations. Mr Herminie said currently Seychelles was not in possession of any nuclear materials, but revealed that the government was in preliminary talks with the International Atomic Agency to get access to nuclear technology to be used in a radio-active treatment for cancer to be introduced in the future. Seychelles signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in March 1985. [http://www.seychelles.net The Seychelles Nation Newspaper's office Long Pier Road,Victoria Seychelles, P.O.Box 800 Victoria , Seychelles Tel: (248) 225775 or 722680 on weekends & public holidays Fax: (248) 321006 Copyright 2000 © Seychelles Nation ***************************************************************** 13 FT: Anger as Malaysia detains nuclear suspect By John Burton in Singapore Published: June 1 2004 5:00 | Last Updated: June 1 2004 5:00 Malaysian human rights groups yesterday accused the government of engaging in a possible political cover-up by imprisoning without trial an alleged key figure in the global nuclear smuggling network headed by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist. Buhary Syed Abu Tahir, a Sri Lankan businessman living in Malaysia, was arrested last week under the country's Internal Security Act, which allows a two-year detention without charges being brought before a court. Mr Tahir was closely linked to a company owned by the son of Abudullah Badawi, the prime minister, that was involved in supplying centrifuge parts to Libya's nuclear weapons programme. His detention was "a clear example of abuse of power" since it could protect "other important persons in the scandal of nuclear weapons from being exposed", said Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh, head of a coalition of rights groups campaigning for the abolition of the ISA. The detention order for Mr Tahir was signed by the prime minister in his dual role as home minister. Mr Syed Ibrahim said the government should either release Mr Tahir or bring him to trial, which would offer him a chance to expose others who might be involved in supplying nuclear parts. Mr Tahir is the highest-ranking operative in the nuclear smuggling group of Abdul Qadeer Khan to be jailed since the ring was uncovered early this year. Mr Khan has been pardoned by the Pakistani government. When Mr Tahir's role was disclosed in February, Malaysia refused to arrest him then because it said he had not broken any local laws. "We are puzzled why he was arrested now rather than several months ago. His detention prevents bringing forward essential information in a transparent manner and instead keeps it hidden from the public eye," said Cynthia Gabriel, head of Suara Rakyat Malaysia, a leading human rights group. Mr Tahir had earlier been questioned about his role in the Khan network by the Malaysian police, who released a report absolving Scomi Group, the company controlled by the prime minister's son, Kamaluddin Abdullah, of any complicity in the deal. Copyright The Financial Times Ltd 2004. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. ***************************************************************** 14 Toronto Ontario Star: Ontario urged to drop nuclear fix, seek alternatives TheStar.com - Tue. Jun. 1, 2004. | Updated at 02:20 PM FROM CANADIAN PRESS If the Ontario government wants to shut down its coal plants by 2007, it must permanently sideline the restart of the Pickering A nuclear unit and instead focus on the construction of natural gas-fired plants and renewable energy facilities, says a report to be released Tuesday. Although the report by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance gives the government a B-plus grade for taking steps to phase out the province's five coal-fired plants, it warns the government will only be falling into a sinkhole if it continues with the rehabilitation of Unit 1 at the Pickering A nuclear reactor. "Hopefully they will reject that recommendation because that could badly sidetrack the government and lots of money could be wasted on pursuing nuclear, which is the highest-cost and highest-risk option to phase out coal in Ontario," Jack Gibbons, chair of the alliance and an author of the report, said in an interview. Ontario Power Generation has a dismal record for cost overruns and lengthy delays with its refurbishment of its nuclear reactors, says the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Canadian Press. A decision by OPG's board about the reactor is expected in June, but the final decision will rest with Premier Dalton McGuinty and his cabinet, the report says. The report also says it would be about 45 per cent cheaper to build a high-efficiency natural gas electricity generating plant than to spend about $500 million on the restart of Unit 1. The alliance gives the government kudos for its call for 300 megawatts of renewable energy and 2,500 megawatts of conventional electricity, along with its promotion of energy conservation and its move to more realistic energy prices. But there's still a long way to go before the government can make up the energy supply that will be lost by the closure of the polluting coal plants, the report says. "There is no question that if the government doesn't pick up the pace of its actions in the next six months, it risks falling seriously behind and missing key opportunities to improve public health for the people of Ontario," Gibbons said. The coal plants are one of the province's worst polluters. The government has missed a number of key opportunities as it aims to shut the coal plants by 2007, the report says. The government hasn't ordered the Independent Market Operator to develop an aggressive demand-response program — such as paying major energy consumers like factories to curb use during peak hours in the summer. The IMO would get the money back through its charges to market participants, and all businesses would benefit since electricity prices would drop along with demand, Gibbons said. In the next six months, the government must move ahead on having smart electricity meters installed in homes so people can save money by conserving energy, the report says. Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com [http://www.thestar.com] is ***************************************************************** 15 Xinhuanet: Nuclear attack against US inevitable: US academic www.xinhuanet.com www.chinaview.cn 2004-06-01 13:44:27 WELLINGTON, June 1 (Xinhuanet) -- A nuclear attack by terrorists against the United States is inevitable, said an American international relations expert visiting the New Zealand University of Canterbury. Last week US Attorney General John Ashcroft said credible intelligence from multiple sources indicated that the al Qaeda terror network was planning an attack on the US in the next few months. Professor Terry Nardin, a political scientist from the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, said in statement Tuesday that despite the intelligence sources of the US authorities, terrorist organisations such as al Qaeda are still capable of planning and carrying out attacks. "I see a kind of offence-defence race. We're busy defending ourselves in ways that we've thought of and al Qaeda people, who are smart, are busy thinking of ways to get around it," he said. Nardin said there are so many weapons floating around, there isso little control over nuclear material, biological weapons and soforth, "I think it's only a matter of time before there is some catastrophic event." Nardin believed it is not difficult to transport nuclear materials or biological materials around. "There may be a gesture of inspecting aircraft luggage and so on but the whole world container trade goes on so people move around and things move around," he said. Enditem Copyright ©2003 Xinhua News Agency. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 16 Maariv International: BBC airs interview with Vanunu Says he decided to reveal nuclear secrets because of war in Lebanon. 13 Sivan 5764 2 June, 2004 [contact@maariv.co.il?subject=Maariv News Service] The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) has shown a television interview with released nuclear spy Mordecai Vanunu last night (Sunday). It was his first media interview since his release. During the interview with Yael Lotan, Vanunu said that the war in Lebanon has influenced his decision to reveal some of Israel’s nuclear secrets. “It was not the real world. It was an invasion and there was a lot of propaganda used to justify it. I found myself identifying with the Arabs. Very gradually, I found myself on the leftâ€. Vanunu said that he was also influenced by the spread of nuclear radiation after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 and his conversion to Christianity. “It was a period of breaking down barriers and beginning a new way of lifeâ€, he said. (2004-05-31 09:45:01.0) © Maariv International 2004 All Rights Reserved ***************************************************************** 17 ThisisLondon: Britain faces EU 'nuclear fine' thisislondon.co.uk] Guy Dresser, This Is Money 1 June 2004 NUCLEAR operator BNFL is set to miss a key European Union deadline today to clean up part of its Sellafield reprocessing plant. The EU told Britain earlier this year it had to do more to tackle a series of reinforced concrete ponds that store radioactive waste at the Cumbria plant and extended the deadline by when the UK has to set out how it will achieve the task. That deadline expires today and missing it could cost BNFL a hefty fine and see the UK hauled before the European Court. Under European law all EU member states must declare exactly how much nuclear material it possesses. The British Government‘s failure to reveal exactly what is in the concrete ponds at Sellafield means that the UK is technically in breach of EU law. EU spokesman Reijo Kemppinen said in April that it did not know exactly how much waste is stored in the concrete ponds, which were built in the late 1950s, because inspectors hadn‘t been given enough access to the site. Kemppinen said: 'British Nuclear Fuels has failed to comply with the rules concerning accounting for nuclear material and the access of Commission inspectors to nuclear material to check the nature and quality and quantity of the material. 'It is impossible to determine accurately the quantities of material stored and on the spot inspections cannot take place because of the high level of radiation and poor visibility in the part of the facility concerned.' Some of the nuclear waste within the pond has corroded or disintegrated, making the fuel removal and cleaning request from the EU especially difficult to fulfill, according to reports. The clean-up will be a lengthy task because high levels of radiation near the concrete ponds limit the amount of time workers can spend working there. ***************************************************************** 18 FLS: Nuclear power could mean the end of America's oil dependence [fredericksburg.com] Date published: 6/1/2004 The world has only two sources of energy in the quantity needed to serve our nation: fossil fuels and nuclear power. The quantities of solar power, wind power, and other options are too low. This year's $1-a-gallon oil-price increase cost our nation $300 billion, and undoubtedly this cost will continue to grow. What should we do? The world has 1 trillion barrels of oil in the ground and consumes 26 billion barrels a year. In 40 years it will be gone. However, by building thousands of synfuel plants, another 2-3 trillion barrels of oil can be extracted from sand beds, tar beds, and coal beds. All of these sources are private and beyond our nation's control. By simply allowing plant construction to lag behind demand, the price of this oil can be kept at its maximum-revenue level. Thus, we face a future of high prices, permanent shortages, increased global warming, and continued pollution of our environment. Worse yet, it is unlikely that these high profits will be invested within our borders. Clearly, if the country is to buy energy at a competitive price, then it must create an excess of energy. The 300 billion gallons of oil that we consume each year equals the energy output of 1,700 nuclear reactors. Allowing for growth and some excess capacity, we can achieve oil independence in 20 years if we build 100 nuclear reactors a year. The new pebble design is reputed to be 100 percent safe. Nuclear power costs are equivalent to oil at $2 a gallon. This will provide enough power to replace our oil furnaces and, using electrolysis, to manufacture the pollution-free hydrogen gas for our new fuel-cell cars. To prevent monopoly pricing, our nation should retain possession of the plants. Walt Velona Locust Grove Date published: 6/1/2004 Fredericksburg.com, 605 William Street, Fredericksburg, VA 22401 Comments? Send us Feedback, Phone: 540-368-5055 To contact all other newspaper departments, please call 540-374-5000. Copyright 2004, The Free Lance-Star Publishing Co. of Fredericksburg, Va. ***************************************************************** 19 Salt Lake Tribune: An overdue debate: Boosting nuke power to avoid climate chaos May 31, 2004 Gwynne Dyer SYNDICATED COLUMNIST "Unless we stop now, we will really doom the lives of our descendants. If we just go on for another 40 or 50 years faffing around, they'll have no chance at all, it'll be back to the Stone Age. There'll be people around still. But civilization will go." James Lovelock, The Independent, May 24 When James Lovelock calls for a massive expansion in nuclear power generation to ward off the worst effects of climate change, as he did in a front-page article in The Independent this week, you have to pay attention. The future may view him as the most important scientist of the 20th century, and he is revered by the Green movement, which hates nuclear energy. But now he writes: "Every year that we continue burning carbon makes it worse for our descendants and for civilization. . . . I am a Green, and I entreat my friends in the movement to drop their wrongheaded objection to nuclear energy." Lovelock is an independent scientist who grew wealthy by inventing equipment to measure the presence of CFCs, the chemicals used in spray cans and refrigerators that were destroying the ozone layer before they were banned. But his real claim to fame, on a par with Darwin's and Galileo's, was his insight that the Earth is a living system. He often expresses regret for having named that system 'Gaia' (after the Greek goddess of the Earth), because the Green movement and various New Agers started using it as a beautiful metaphor, and delayed its acceptance as a valid scientific observation for several decades. But it is finally being accepted by the scientific community worldwide (with a name change to Earth System Science to placate the guardians of academic orthodoxy). Lovelock has always been worried about radical climate change, because the essence of the Gaia hypothesis is that the current composition of the Earth's air and seas -- the global temperature regime, the salinity of the oceans, even the proportion of oxygen in the atmosphere -- has been shaped over the eons by the activity of living things. Our planet would be radically different, he argues, if living things did not actively maintain the status quo that is so hospitable to life. The concept of Gaia is no more mystical than the notion that triple-canopy tropical jungles create a local microclimate under their leafy ceiling. The emerging "earth system science" just studies the hugely more complex system of biological interactions and feedbacks, involving millions of species, that has evolved over several billion years to optimize conditions on Earth for living things. But this system can lurch into massive change if some major input (like the proportion of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere) is changed. Recent evidence, including last summer's unprecedented heat wave in Europe and new data on the speed that the Greenland ice-cap is melting, has persuaded Lovelock that global warming is now moving far faster than most studies anticipated, and will have calamitous effects on key support systems of human civilization, such as food production, in decades rather than centuries. He doesn't believe that current efforts to reduce the output of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases through the Kyoto accord (which has still to be ratified, in any case) and the encouragement of power generation by wind, wave and solar power can possibly cut carbon emissions enough in time. "I think we should think of ourselves as a bit like we were in 1938," he said. (He's 84, so he remembers.) "There was a war looming, and everybody knew it, but nobody really knew what the hell to do about it." The Kyoto protocol, he said, is "the perfect analogy for the Munich agreement," because it would solve nothing: The cuts it mandates in greenhouse gases are tiny, while it lets politicians look like they are doing something." And the Greens' attachment to renewable energy is "well-intentioned, but misguided, like the left's attachment to disarmament in 1938." So the man who was among the first to warn of climate change says that there should be a massive expansion of nuclear power, which produces hardly any carbon, to deal with the inevitable growth of demand for power without toppling the world into climate change so abrupt and extreme that it would cause a massive human die-off. The problems of radioactive waste and the danger of nuclear accidents are minuscule by comparison, and there is no third alternative. ----- Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries. © Copyright 2004, The Salt Lake Tribune. ***************************************************************** 20 KoreaTimes: Quakes Cause Public Fears About Nuclear Plant Safety Hankooki.com > Korea Times > Nation By Kim Rahn Staff Reporter Saturday¡¯s strong earthquake and aftershocks have set off public fears about the safety of nuclear power plants in North Kyongsang Province, close to the epicenter. The most powerful earthquake, recorded at 5.2 on the Richter scale, occurred Saturday afternoon 80 km east of Uljin, North Kyongsang Province, and two minor quakes occurred the next day. The first aftershock, at 4.45 a.m. 70 km southeast of Uljin, was recorded at 2.0 on the Richter scale and the second one, with a magnitude of 2.2, occurred 9:45 p.m. 10 km northwest of Uljin. ``Small aftershocks after a powerful quake are very common. Sunday¡¯s two quakes are merely aftershocks from Saturday¡¯s quake, the strongest quake observed in recent years,¡¯¡¯ a weather administration official said. Although no damage or casualties were reported, public concerns over the safety of facilities such as nuclear power plants in Uljin and Wolsong are growing, as the epicenter of the last quake was inland. It is also expected that building standards will also be affected by this recent quake. There are four nuclear power plants operating in Uljin, another one under test operation, and another one under construction. Another four more plants are planned. The alarms installed at the plants did not go off, as the quakes didn¡¯t reach the minimum level required by quake detectors. ``Those power plants were designed to resist quakes of a magnitude 6.5, which is 30 times stronger than Saturday¡¯s one. They will be fine even if an earthquake 30 times more powerful breaks out right under the plants,¡¯¡¯ an official of science and technology ministry said. However, the ministry¡¯s explanation is not enough to relieve public worries, as the plants¡¯ ability to resist powerful earthquakes is unverifiable, and there is a possibility that future quakes will exceed a magnitude of 6.5. Japan, which has frequent earthquakes, has tried to strengthen the safety standards of buildings after suffering quakes of a magnitude of 7.3 in Kobe and Osaka in 1995. There has been talk that Korea should prepare for the possibility of large-scale quakes by checking the earthquake-proof standards of nuclear power plants and conducting earthquake drills. But related authorities have neglected those opinions as of yet. ``The authorities should check the safety of existing plants and postpone the planned constructions of the four new plants until a thorough inspection has been carried out,¡¯¡¯ a civic group said. rahnita@koreatimes.co.kr 05-31-2004 18:14 ***************************************************************** 21 NRC: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, R. E. Ginna Nuclear FR Doc 04-12212 [Federal Register: June 1, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 105)] [Notices] [Page 30963] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01jn04-131] Power Plant; Notice of Issuance of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-18 for an Additional 20-Year Period Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR- 18 to Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (licensee), the operator of the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna). Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-18 authorizes operation of Ginna by the licensee at reactor core power levels not in excess of 1520 megawatts thermal (490 megawatts electric) in accordance with the provisions of the Ginna renewed license and its Technical Specifications. The Ginna plant is a pressurized, light-water-moderated and cooled, nuclear reactor located in Wayne County, New York. The application for the renewed license complied with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's regulations. As required by the Act and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR Chapter 1, the Commission has made appropriate findings, which are set forth in each license. Prior public notice of the action involving the proposed issuance of the renewed license and of an opportunity for a hearing regarding the proposed issuance of the renewed license was published in the Federal Register on September 30, 2002 (67 FR 61354). For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation's license renewal application for R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant dated July 30, 2002, as supplemented by letters dated through January 9, 2004; (2) the Commission's safety evaluation report, dated May 2004 (NUREG-1786); (3) the licensee's updated safety analysis report; and (4) the Commission's final environmental impact statements (NUREG-1437, Supplement 14, for the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, dated January, 2004). These documents are available at the NRC's Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, and can be viewed from the NRC Public Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html] . Copies of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-18, may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Director, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs. Copies of the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-1786) and the final environmental impact statements (NUREG-1437, Supplement 14) may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia 22161 (http://www.ntis.gov [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.ntis.gov] ), (703) 605-6000, or Attention: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, PO Box 371954 Pittsburgh, PA. 15250-7954 (http://www.gpoaccess.gov [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.gpoaccess.gov] ), (202) 512-1800. All orders should clearly identify the NRC publication number and the requestor's Government Printing Office deposit account number or VISA or MasterCard number and expiration date. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of May, 2004. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Steven West, Acting Program Director, License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 04-12212 Filed 5-28-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 22 Reuters: Constellation seeks new license for N.Y. nuke Tue Jun 1, 2004 08:45 AM ET NEW YORK, June 1 (Reuters) - Constellation Energy Group Inc. (CEG.N: Quote [http://www.investor.reuters.com/FullQuote.aspx?ticker=CEG.N&targ et=%2fstocks%2fquickinfo%2ffullquote] , Profile [http://www.investor.reuters.com/CompanyOverview.aspx?ticker=CEG. N] , Research [http://www.investor.reuters.com/StockReports.aspx?ticker=CEG.N] ) filed an application with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a 20-year renewal of the operating licenses for units 1 and 2 at the Nine Mile Point nuclear station in New York. The current 40-year operating licenses were scheduled to expire in August 2009 for 565 megawatt unit 1 and October 2026 for 1,105 MW unit 2, according to a statement from the NRC on Friday. Together the two-units produce enough energy to power more than 1.6 million homes. Unit 1, which started producing power in 1969, is one of the oldest reactors in the United States still in operation. Unit 2 began commercial operations in 1988. Officials at Constellation were not immediately available to discuss why unit 2's 40-year license expires in 38 years. Industry sources have said it usually takes a company about five years to obtain a new operating license from the NRC. The Nine Mile Point station is located in Scriba, New York, about 95 miles east of Rochester, New York. Constellation, which owns all of unit 1, operates the Nine Mile station for its owners. Unit 2 is owned by Constellation (82 percent) and the Long Island Power Authority (18 percent). ***************************************************************** 23 National Post: Use renewables, not nuclear: report Gillian Livingston Canadian Press June 1, 2004 TORONTO -- If the Ontario government wants to shut down its coal plants by 2007, it must permanently sideline the restart of the Pickering A nuclear unit and instead focus on the construction of natural gas-fired plants and renewable energy facilities, says a report to be released Tuesday. Although the report by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance gives the government a B-plus grade for taking steps to phase out the province's five coal-fired plants, it warns the government will only be falling into a sink hole if it continues with the rehabilitation of Unit 1 at the Pickering A nuclear reactor. "Hopefully they will reject that recommendation because that could badly sidetrack the government and lots of money could be wasted on pursuing nuclear, which is the highest-cost and highest-risk option to phase out coal in Ontario,'' Jack Gibbons, chair of the alliance and an author of the report, said in an interview. Ontario Power Generation has a dismal record for cost overruns and lengthy delays with its refurbishment of its nuclear reactors, says the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Canadian Press. A decision by OPG's board about the reactor is expected in June, but the final decision will rest with Premier Dalton McGuinty and his cabinet, the report says. The report also says it would be about 45 per cent cheaper to build a high-efficiency natural gas electricity generating plant than to spend about $500 million on the restart of Unit 1. The alliance gives the government kudos for its call for 300 megawatts of renewable energy and 2,500 megawatts of conventional electricity, along with its promotion of energy conservation and its move to more realistic energy prices. But there's still a long way to go before the government can make up the energy supply that will be lost by the closure of the polluting coal plants, the report says. "There is no question that if the government doesn't pick up the pace of its actions in the next six months, it risks falling seriously behind and missing key opportunities to improve public health for the people of Ontario,'' Gibbons said. The coal plants are one of the province's worst polluters. The government has missed a number of key opportunities as it aims to shut the coal plants by 2007, the report says. The government hasn't ordered the Independent Market Operator to develop an aggressive demand-response program -- such as paying major energy consumers like factories to curb use during peak hours in the summer. The IMO would get the money back through its charges to market participants, and all businesses would benefit since electricity prices would drop along with demand, Gibbons said. In the next six months, the government must move ahead on having smart electricity meters installed in homes so people can save money by conserving energy, the report says. © Canadian Press 2004 Copyright © CanWest Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. CanWest Interactive Inc. is an affiliate of CanWest Global ***************************************************************** 24 Sofia Morning News: Bulgaria's N-plant Contracts German NUKEM, GNB SOFIA NEWS AGENCY [http://www.novinite.com/] Business: 31 May 2004, Monday. A contract for the design and construction of a new storage for spent fuel at Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant was signed Monday with a tie-in between Germany's RWE NUKEM Gmbh and GNB mbh. The contract is worth EUR 48.7 M and is financed by an international fund administered by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The new facility will be able to store casks of spent nuclear fuel up to fifty years. The design of the storage will allow expansion of its capacity. The storage will be constructed for four years and a half, Kozloduy CEO Yordan Kostadinov announced. Bulgaria's only nuclear power plant Kozloduy reported net profit of BGN 9,6 M for 2003, down by BGN 3.8 M year upon year due to the closure of the two oldest reactors at the end of 2002.[ All Rights Reserved © Novinite Ltd., 2001-2004 - Copyright ***************************************************************** 25 NRC: Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding FR Doc 04-12213 [Federal Register: June 1, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 105)] [Notices] [Page 30963-30964] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01jn04-132] of No Significant Impact for License Amendment for ABB Prospects, Inc.'s Facility in Windsor, CT AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of availability of environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph C. Ragland, Jr., Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406; telephone (610) 337-5083; by facsimile transmission to (610) 337-5269; or by e- mail to rcr1@nrc.gov [rcr1@nrc.gov] . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a license amendment to Material License No. 06-00217-06 issued to ABB Prospects, Inc., to authorize the decommissioning of its CE Windsor facility in Windsor, CT. NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of these actions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate. The amendment will be issued following the publication of this Notice. II. EA Summary The purpose of the proposed action is to authorize the decontamination and decommissioning of the ABB Prospects, Inc.'s CE Windsor, CT site to permit release for unrestricted use and termination of NRC License No. 06-00217-06. From the mid-1950s, the Combustion Engineering (CE) Site in Windsor, CT has been involved in research, development, engineering, production, and servicing of nuclear fuel systems, and services. On October 15, 2003, ABB Prospects, Inc. submitted [[Page 30964]] a site-wide Decommissioning Plan (DP) for the CE Windsor, CT facility, and requested NRC to amend NRC License No. 06-00217-06 to incorporate the DP into the license. ABB Prospects, Inc.'s proposed action was previously noticed in the Federal Register on February 6, 2004 (FR Volume 69, Number 25, Pages 5879-5880], along with a notice of an opportunity to request a hearing. At the completion of remediation, ABB Prospects, Inc. plans to conduct radiological surveys sufficient to demonstrate that the site meets the license termination criteria in Subpart E of 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has prepared an EA in support of the proposed license amendment. NRC evaluated the proposed action, alternatives to the proposed action, the affected environment, radiological impacts to workers and the public from planned decommissioning activities, and planned actions to minimize the impact to the environment. III. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the EA, NRC has concluded that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement. IV. Further Information The EA and the documents related to this proposed action, including the application for the license amendment, the DP, and supporting documentation, are available for inspection at NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html] (ADAMS Accession No. ML040300149. These documents are also available for inspection and copying for a fee at the Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, 19406. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or (301) 415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov [ pdr@nrc.gov] . Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, this 21st day of May, 2004. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Marie T. Miller, Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, RI. [FR Doc. 04-12213 Filed 5-28-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 26 NRC: Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for the FR Doc 04-12214 [Federal Register: June 1, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 105)] [Notices] [Page 30962-30963] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr01jn04-130] Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review; Comment Request AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and solicitation of public comment. SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to OMB for review the following proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). The NRC hereby informs potential respondents that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and that a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: Extension. 2. The title of the information collection: NRC Forms 540 and 540A, ``Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest (Shipping Paper) and Continuation Page;'' NRC Forms 541 and 541A, ``Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest, Container and Waste Description, and Continuation Page;'' NRC Forms 542 and 542A, ``Uniform Low-Level Radioactive Waste Manifest, Index and Regional Compact Tabulation''. 3. The form number if applicable: NRC Forms 540 and 540A; NRC Forms 541 and 541A; and NRC Forms 542 and 542A. 4. How often the collection is required: Forms are used by shippers whenever radioactive waste is shipped. Quarterly or less frequent reporting is made to NRC depending on specific license conditions. 5. Who will be required or asked to report: All NRC-licensed low- level waste facilities. All generators, collectors, and processors of low-level waste intended for disposal at a low-level waste facility must complete the appropriate forms. 6. An estimate of the number of annual responses: NRC Form 540 and 540A: 2,500. NRC Form 541 and 541A: 2,500. NRC Form 542 and 542A: 22. 7. The number of annual respondents: NRC Form 540 and 540A: 2,500 licensees. NRC Form 541 and 541A: 2,500 licensees. NRC Form 542 and 542A: 22 licensees. 8. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to complete the requirement or request: NRC Form 540 and 540A: 10,050 (.75 hours per response). NRC Form 541 and 541A: 44,341 (3.3 hours per response). NRC Form 542 and 542A: 567 (.75 hours per response). 9. An indication of whether section 3507(d), Public Law 104-13 applies: N/A. 10. Abstract: NRC Forms 540, 541, and 542, together with their continuation pages, designated by the ``A'' suffix, provide a set of standardized forms to meet Department of Transportation (DOT), NRC, and State requirements. The forms were developed by NRC at the request of low-level waste industry groups. The forms provide uniformity and efficiency in the collection of information contained in manifests which are required to control transfers of low-level radioactive waste intended for disposal at a land disposal facility. NRC Form 540 contains information needed to satisfy DOT shipping paper requirements in 49 CFR part 172 and the waste tracking requirements of NRC in 10 CFR part 20. NRC Form 541 contains information needed by disposal site facilities to safely dispose of low-level waste and information to meet NRC and State requirements regulating these activities. NRC Form 542, completed by waste collectors or processors, contains information which facilitates tracking the identity of the waste generator. That tracking becomes more complicated when the waste forms, dimensions, or packagings are changed by the waste processor. Each container of waste shipped from a waste processor may contain waste from several different generators. The information provided on NRC Form 542 permits the States and Compacts to know the original generators of low-level waste, as authorized by the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, so they can ensure that [[Page 30963]] waste is disposed of in the appropriate Compact. A copy of the final supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. OMB clearance requests are available at the NRC World Wide Web site: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comment/omb/index.html [http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leaving FR.html&log=linklog&to=http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doc-comm ent/omb/index.html] . The document will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after the signature date of this notice. Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer listed below by July 1, 2004. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration cannot be given to comments received after this date. OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (3150-0164; 3150-0166; 3150-0165), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. Comments can also be submitted by telephone at (202) 395-3087. The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda Jo. Shelton, 301-415-7233. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of May, 2004. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Brenda Jo. Shelton, NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 04-12214 Filed 5-28-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P ***************************************************************** 27 [NYTr] Vieques: Military Failure to Clean Up Denounced Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:09:12 -0500 (CDT) Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit Committee for the Rescue and Development of Vieques P.O. Box 1424 Vieques, Puerto Rico 00765 Tel 787 741-0716 Fax 787 741-0358 Email: oficina@prorescateviques.org http://www.prorescatevieques.org http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bieke_pr/ 30 May, 2004 Press Release Viequenses in ex military zone to denounce lack of clean up and demand return of lands The Committee for the Rescue and Developmnet of Vieques (CRDV) mobilized on Sunday around one hundred people in fishing boats to the area once used by the US Navy for bombing and other military practices. Representatives of religious communities, labor and political leaders joined dozens of Vieques residents in the activity titled, "The Return to the Camps". In reference to the civil disobedience camps that stopped Navy bombing for a year following the deathof David Sanes in April of 1999, the activity was held to dramatize the urgent necessity for decontamination and the return of Vieques' lands to its people. CRDV spokespersons expressed satisfaction with the participation and the committment shown by diverse sectors of the Puerto Rican society in this post bombing stage of the struggle for peace on Vieques. Eleven people stayed in the restricted area - now controlled by the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) - until Tuesday, to denounce the slowness of the clean up process and lack of action by Puerto Rican and Federal politicians to have lands transferred to the people here. The Viequenses, Mario Sol=EDs, Jos=E9 Rivera, Rafael Brignoni, Abdel Guadalupe, H=E9ctor Cintr=F3n, Emma Nieves, Kathy Gannett and Ismael Guadalupe, with support from Alberto Mill=E1n, Carlos Claudio and Richard Matos, pro Vieques activists from the main island, set up camp where the first ecumenical chapel had been built. During Sunday's activities, flowers were tossed at sea in memory of Jenny Ben=EDtez (CRDV) recent Viequense cancer victim and Zoraida Figueroa, one of the founders of the Pro Vieques Camp next to the Federal Prison in Puerto Rico. The activists who remain in the area indicated by telephone that visitor in yahts that frequent the area every week end since the Navy stopped bombing, have created an enormous garbage dump and denounced the lack of action by FWS on this situation. They described as incompetent this federal agency that did nothing to protect Vieques nature during decades of military destruction and now does nothing to avoid this new form of contamination on this island municipality. Committee spokespersons said they do not discount future use of non violent civil disobedience in defense of the environment, health and the natural right to enjoy and use their territory. Group leaders also mentioned upcoming actions to push for sustainable, community controlled development and against recently announced mega hotel projects planned for the island. * To subscribe or unsubscribe or change your settings via the web, visit: http://tania.blythe-systems.com/mailman/listinfo/nytr ================================================================= NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us 339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012 http://www.blythe.org e-mail: nyt@blythe.org ================================================================= ***************************************************************** 28 [DU-WATCH] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 02:16:49 -0500 (CDT) Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Story by Lisa Richwine REUTERS USA: May 24, 2004 http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/25212/story.htm WASHINGTON - The U.S. military should clean up depleted uranium ammunition scattered across Iraq to prevent future health problems such as cancer and birth defects, a leading anti-nuclear activist said. The Pentagon said it had not found any evidence the material, which is so dense it can pierce steel tanks, causes long-term health consequences. An ongoing study of 1991 Gulf War veterans has shown no ill effects. But Dr. Helen Caldicott, a pediatrician and president of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute, linked depleted uranium to higher rates of cancer and birth defects in Iraq following the Gulf War. Depleted uranium ammunition is being used by U.S. troops in Iraq and could seriously harm civilians living there in the decades to come, said Caldicott, founding president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, an anti-nuclear group that shared the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize. "We should be taking responsibility for what is happening over there," she told reporters at the National Press Club. The Pentagon should test buildings in Iraq for depleted uranium, destroy ones with high levels and bury the material underground, Caldicott said. The U.S. government also should compensate people with cancer related to the material, she said. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of nuclear fuel production. It strengthens ammunition and gives weapons twice the range of ones using other heavy metals. Tanks made with depleted uranium have proven impenetrable by enemy weapons, the Pentagon said. There has been controversy about it since its use during the Gulf War and the Balkans conflict, including some claims that European soldiers may have developed leukemia after being exposed to the material in Kosovo in 1999. "We don't see anything from the science" indicating long-term health problems to people exposed to depleted uranium in the environment, said Dr. Michael Kilpatrick, the Defense Department's deputy director for deployment health support. An ongoing study of 70 Gulf War veterans who were hit by weapons using depleted uranium in "friendly fire" incidents has found no major health problems for the soldiers or their 35 children, Kilpatrick said. Kilpatrick said research on potential long-term impacts is continuing. "We are looking at it scientifically. We are keeping an open mind to it," he said in an interview. ____________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/Sj.0lB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> [Brought to you by HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-watch/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-watch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 29 Taipei Times: Potassium iodide pills part of nuclear safety campaign [http://www.taipeitimes.com] By Chiu Yu-Tzu STAFF REPORTER Tuesday, Jun 01, 2004,Page 2 Advertising [Advertising] Nuclear safety will be increased in the near future by providing potassium iodide (KI) pills to residents living near nuclear power plants and adopting recently-improved plasma technology to resolve problems with the treatment of low-level radioactive waste, Atomic Energy Council Chairman Ouyang Min-shen (¼Ú¶§±Ó²±) said yesterday. Since Taiwan's first nuclear power plant opened in 1978, there have concerns over nuclear safety, including emergency measures and treatment of radioactive waste. Because a major nuclear accident could expose tens of thousands of people to high levels of radiation, environmentalists and health professionals have advocated stockpiling KI tablets or distributing them to people residing near the plants. Ouyang said that the council decided to provide KI pills to residents living within 5km of the three operational nuclear power plants. "I think our society is mature enough to deal with the issue. The government will not hesitate to talk about nuclear safety with the public," Ouyang said. According to council deputy chairman Chiou Syh-tsong (ªô½çÁo), the Department of Health would soon discuss how to handle dispensing the pills. By law, such pills can only be obtained by prescription. "We believe that the Department of Health will handle the issue smoothly because precedents can be seen in France and parts of the US," Chiou said. Meanwhile, Ouyang said the council will tackle problems with the treatment of low-level radioactive waste soon. He said the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research had significantly improved a process involving thermal plasma vitrification treatment of such waste. Ouyang said long-standing problems with the waste could be resolved if state-run Taiwan Power Co used the technology. The technology can reduce the volume of untreated waste to one-third the original amount and the vitrified remains can be safely stored in a final repository. "Therefore we shouldn't have the kind of local opposition and geological challenges when choosing potential sites for final repositories of low-level waste," Ouyang said. He said vitrified radioactive materials would be bound up in glass or other depositories and would not be easily released. "Even if water comes in contact with the waste after it is placed in a disposal facility, there will not be problems with fallout," Ouyang said. Under ideal conditions, he said that the treatment of 98,000 barrels of low-level radioactive waste stored on Orchid Island and some similar waste in operational nuclear power plants would be launched within four years. This story has been viewed 433 times. Copyright © 1999-2004 The Taipei Times. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 30 Aljazeera.Net: Radioactive machine stolen in China Authorities in China are concerned about the theft of a piece of potentially deadly radioactive equipment. Hundreds of police in Shanghai have been searching for a small cylinder containing a gamma-ray apparatus capable of transmitting fatal doses of radiation, Chinese state press reported on Tuesday. The 10kg box containing the instrument used to perform industrial radiography on construction sites disappeared early on Saturday after a company driver parked a car carrying the cylinder outside his flat, the Shanghai Daily said. When he returned, the canister clearly marked with a warning sign, was missing. Press reports said a two-day search in the city's northern Jingshan district were yet to yield results. Police were not available for comment. The company has offered a $1200 reward for information leading to the discovery of the hazardous material. "As a professional, he should have never left such equipment out of his sight on the street, let alone leaving it unattended," the Shanghai Daily quoted Lu Shuyu, a radiation expert, as saying of the driver. AFP ***************************************************************** 31 The Ledger: Man Exposed To Radiation Lakeland, Polk County, Florida Lakeland, Florida Published Monday, May 31, 2004 The Associated Press A man was exposed to radiation in a soil-testing device that had been reported stolen from a construction site, officials said. The man told authorities Saturday that he found the machine on the side of the road, Miami-Dade County Fire Rescue officials said. He was taken to Baptist Hospital for observation after the portable nuclear moisture-density gauge was recovered at his suburban West Kendall home. U.S. South Engineering and Testing Lab, which reported the theft Friday, uses the device to test soil compactness. The device, which can cost as much as $10,000, presents no public health threat if properly stored in its protective case. Last modified: May 31. 2004 12:00AM Back to Top Copyright 2004 The Ledger ***************************************************************** 32 Casper Star Trib: Company seeks gas near nuclear bomb site Casper, Wyoming - Tuesday, June 01, 2004 www.casperstartribune.net GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (AP) -- A Texas energy company wants permission to drill a natural gas well not far from where a 43-kiloton nuclear bomb was exploded underground in 1969. Presco Inc. official Kim Bennetts said Thursday strict precautions and state restrictions will be followed if authorities approve the permit request. The Energy Department can impose conditions whenever a well is proposed within three miles of Project Rulison, where the bomb was exploded 8,400 feet underground in an unsuccessful bid to free gas reserves. The well would be drilled as much as 3,000 feet from the half-mile radius "ground zero" zone surrounding the site, Bennetts said at the Northwest Colorado Oil and Gas Forum. The site is about six miles southeast of Parachute. "They've found little or no dangerous radioactivity remaining since the 1971 burning of about 150 million cubic feet of gas" from the site, Bennetts said. "We feel that if there is any (radioactivity) still down there, it's in (different sandstone formations) and can't migrate more than a few hundred feet." He said the well could be plugged if tests show gas is contaminated. Energy Department project manager Pete Sanders said only background radioactivity had been found during 30 years of tests on water sources. Presco President David Wheeler said the company would likely apply for a permit from the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission soon. If approved, the well could be drilled in late August or early September. "We don't have billions of dollars to throw at this, so we're going to do it right," Wheeler said. "We're telling you what we're going to do; now we're going to do it right." Residents at the meeting said they were not convinced things will be done safely. "If you accidentally drill into a crack that has some of that gas and it's released into the air, that would be hell for this whole valley," Harold Graves of Battlement Mesa said. W. Michael Smith lives near Silt, where natural gas seeping into a creek has been blamed on a nearby well. "We were told that something like that could never happen," Smith said. "Now you want to drill around a nuclear site and you're telling us the same thing." Copyright © 2004 by the Casper Star-Tribune published by Lee Publications, Inc., a subsidiary of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated ***************************************************************** 33 New York Times: As New York Fumes, Wyoming Says It, Too, Needs Antiterror Funds Ernie Leyba for The New York Times Antiterror money got a chemical identifier set for Cheyenne's Fire Department. Ernie Leyba for The New York Times Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, just off the Interstate, is home to the 90th Space Wing, which oversees an arsenal of 150 Minuteman III and 50 Peacekeeper nuclear missiles. Their locations are on the Internet. By EDWARD WYATT Published: June 1, 2004 [C] HEYENNE, Wyo., May 27 - It is hard to imagine there are many terrorist threats in a place where tumbleweeds regularly blow down the streets, as they do here in Wyoming's largest city and state capital. For those who doubt, however, Wyoming officials point to the two men who were stopped by a state trooper in February on Interstate 80 about 10 miles east of Cheyenne, near the Nebraska border. The men, thought by the state police to be white supremacists, had nine pipe bombs in the rented trailer attached to their rented truck. Wyoming officials disposed of the bombs using a robot bought with a federal antiterrorism grant. That grant was part of the very antiterrorism program that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg recently called "pork barrel politics at its worst." Testifying in May before the commission investigating the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bloomberg said too much money was going to places that face limited threats - like Wyoming, whose population is about half a million, the smallest in the country - which this year will receive more than $38 a person in antiterrorist financing, more than any other state and seven times the per-person amount that will flow to New York. But as with the nuclear missiles that stand hidden in silos beneath the rolling hills and grassy plains here in the state's southeastern corner, the logic of why so much homeland security money seems to be flowing so freely in Wyoming can be found only below the surface. As was made clear recently by the vague descriptions of terrorist threats highlighted by Attorney General John Ashcroft and Robert S. Mueller III, the director of the F.B.I., no one except the terrorists themselves can know when or where the next strike will come. "If we understand anything about the psychology of terrorism," said Larry W. Majerus, deputy director of the Wyoming Office of Homeland Security, "it is that attacks in the future are likely to be multiple and designed to get the biggest psychological effect they can possibly get. One way to do that is to attack in areas where there is the least capacity to respond," like Wyoming. Upon inspection, it is not terribly hard to find potential targets for terrorists here. If the exit on Interstate 25 marked "Missile Drive" is not enough of a hint, for example, then the models of three intercontinental ballistic missiles standing at the entrance to the Francis E. Warren Air Force Base, just off the Interstate, makes it clear that there is more going on here than meets the eye. The base is home to the 90th Space Wing, which oversees an arsenal of 150 Minuteman III and 50 Peacekeeper nuclear missiles. The missiles are spread across a network of underground silos in eastern Wyoming, western Nebraska and northern Colorado. Although military and state officials have kept extra-quiet about the arsenal and have tightened security around the base since 9/11, the locations of the missile silos can still be found on the Internet. Cheyenne, population 53,000, sits at the intersection of Interstate Highways 80 and 25, two of the nation's busiest arteries. The Union Pacific and Burlington Northern lines also intersect here, and rail freight cars are perhaps one of the few things that outnumber cows, buffalo or elk in this state. Both the railroads and the highways, of course, are used to transport large amounts of chemicals and hazardous waste, in addition to providing prime routes for terrorists to travel across the country. Wyoming is one of the country's biggest suppliers of beef and agricultural products, making the safety of the food supply a primary concern for state officials. Much of the coal used on the East Coast, meanwhile, originates here, and the state produces significant amounts of oil and gas. A power plant in southwestern Wyoming, near Rock Springs, provides power to much of the West Coast. To address these threats, Wyoming is scheduled to receive $18.8 million this fiscal year - six-tenths of 1 percent of the $2.9 billion in counterterrorism grants being awarded by the federal Department of Homeland Security. continued Copyright 2004 [http://www.nytco.com/] | ***************************************************************** 34 New Straits Times: Radioactive material to be safely shipped out of Lumut Malaysia News Online Wednesday, June 02 2004, Mimi Syed Yusof [mimisy@nst.com.my] IPOH, May 31: The iron oxide or “red earth” currently stored on a plot of land at the Kampung Acheh Industrial Park in Lumut is expected to be shipped out within 10 days. Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) director-general Dr Rehir Dahlan said he was informed of this by the operator managing the industrial by-product, after a visit by AELB officials last week. He said the samples collected by his officials verified that the radioactive activity of the iron oxide was low. However, he said preventive measures have been taken to ensure that the iron oxide was properly stored while waiting for it to be shipped out. Copyright © 2004 NST Online. All rights reserved. Powered by: Zope, Red Hat, Apache, Python, Perl ***************************************************************** 35 St. Petersburg Times: Bellona Wins Case on Secrets of Nuclear Submarines - #973, Tuesday, June 1, 2004 By Vladimir Kovalev STAFF WRITER Environmental Rights Center Bellona on Thursday won a court case over a dispute with the Defense Minister and the Navy Commander on declassifying information about accidents on board Soviet nuclear submarines. The presidium of the Moscow City Court said that the information requested by environmentalists cannot be classified and that Bellona can demand its release. "This ruling establishes a precedent," said St. Petersburg lawyer Ivan Pavlov, head of the Institute for the Development of Freedom of Information, who was hired by Bellona to work on the case. "In the past the courts had no idea at all how to get documents declassified." "After we have dealt with some formalities, the case will be handed over to the Presnya District Court [in Moscow]," he said Thursday in a telephone interview. "In theory, it should be heard within the 10 days after the case is submitted, but it is unlikely to happen so fast judging from how our courts work." Bellona is seeking information on nuclear submarine accidents that occurred between 1961 and 1985. It sent its first request to Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov in mid-2002. Within a month Navy head Vladimir Kuroyedov replied, telling the environmentalists he refused to supply any information about the accidents. Bellona then used a court system that demonstrated its unwillingness to tackle such a sensitive matter as that of classified information. "This case is full of interesting moments," Pavlov said. Bellona filed its first case in August 2002 to Presnya District Court, which has jurisdiction over cases involving the Defense Ministry. But the court refused to hear the case, saying that state secrets were a matter for the Moscow City Court. In August last year, the city court ruled that Bellona's request was outside the jurisdiction of "a court of a city of federal significance" and said the case should be heard in the Presnya court because it "does not concern state secrets." "We found ourselves in an absurd situation with two rulings that completely contradicted each other," Pavlov said. Thursday's ruling has paved the way for the requests to be answered. "It is more or less known what happened, when and on which submarines," Bellona representative Rashid Alimov said Monday a telephone interview. "There is information in our reports, but we wanted it to be confirmed officially." "According to our information taken from different open sources there were failures on nuclear reactors between 1961 and 1985 on submarines with tactical numbers K-19, K-387, K-208, K-279, K-447, K-508, K-209, K-210, K-216, K-316, K-462, K-38, K-37, K-371, and K-367," Bellona's request for information says. "It is known that there were human casualties and also that radiation leaked into the atmosphere. But to this day information on the consequences of the accidents is hidden from the public." Kuroyedov said he "does not know which open sources were used to get information on accidents, and what is more, the tactical numbers of submarines" and has confirmed only one, that of K-19. In his letter to Bellona Kuroyedov said only that all measures necessary to take care of victims had already been implemented. Bellona treated the letter as an attempt to avoid having to supply the information requested. The Navy press service could not be reached for comment Monday. Bellona's report on the Murmansk-based Northern Fleet mentions 18 cases of technical failures involving Soviet nuclear submarines from 1961 to 1985, including cases in which people died. According to the report, 39 sailors died Sept. 8, 1967 in the Norwegian sea as a result of a fire on board the submarine K-3; 28 sailors died a result of a fire on Feb. 24, 1972 on board the famous K-19 submarine, which was on its way back from service in the Northern Atlantic; on Sept. 26, 1976 another 8 sailors died in the Barents Sea as a result of a fire started by old rags catching fire on board the submarine K-47; 13 sailors died on June 18, 1984 after an electrician's clothing caught fire on submarine K-131, and two crew died on K-387 in 1976 as a result of a condenser failure. All this and the rest of the disasters linked to different leaks and technical problems with reactors on submarines are described in detail on the web site bellona.org. More top stories: FSB Tells NTV to Cut Clip | Admirer of Russian Avant-Garde Wins Pritzker | Lappeenranta and Imatra: Finnish Cities Linked to St. Pete | Visitors With Swastikas | St. Petersburg's 301st Anniversary | Something to say? Write to the Opinion Page Editor. E-mail [letters@sptimesrussia.com?subject=Bellona Wins Case on Secrets of Nuclear Submarines ] or online form: If you are willing for your comment to be published as a letter to the editor, please supply your first name, last name and the city and country where you live. Your email: Little about you: [Copyright] copyright The St. Petersburg Times 1993-2004 ***************************************************************** 36 Las Vegas SUN: AP: Miners Drawn to Illegal Congo Uranium By TODD PITMAN ASSOCIATED PRESS SHINKOLOBWE, Congo (AP) - Business is booming in the mining zone that supplied uranium for the atomic bombs unleashed on Hiroshima and Nagasaki - despite a decree by Congo's president banning all mining activity here. President Joseph Kabila ordered the zone closed three months ago amid growing concerns that unregulated nuclear materials could get into the hands of so-called rogue nations or terrorist groups. Yet 1,000 miles away from the capital, Kinshasa, thousands of diggers are still hacking away at a dark cavity of open earth in this southeastern village, filling thousands of burlap sacks a day with black soil rich in cobalt, copper - and radioactive uranium. The illegal mining provides stark evidence of how little control Africa's third-largest nation has over its own nuclear resources, highlighting the government's weak authority beyond the capital in the aftermath of Congo's devastating 1998-2002 war. "They're digging as fast as they can dig, and everyone is buying it," John Skinner, a mining engineer in the nearby town of Likasi, said of the illegal freelance mining at Shinkolobwe. "The problem is that nobody knows where it's all going. There is no control." The raw uranium is an inadvertent addition to the miners' real prize - high-grade cobalt in lucrative concentrations - and there is no evidence Congo's uranium is being spirited away to terrorists. The United States, which pressured Kabila to close the mine out of concern over the uranium, said in March it did not believe there was any "worrisome movement" of the radioactive ore at Shinkolobwe. But some proliferation experts worry because the digging is uncontrolled, and they caution that even small amounts should be tracked for misuse. Shinkolobwe's deposits were discovered in 1915 when Congo was a Belgian colony. The find helped thrust the world into the nuclear age, providing much of the uranium used in the atomic bombs the United States dropped on Japan in 1945. Shinkolobwe ceased to be profitable and closed in 1960, Mining Minister Diomi Ndongala said. Belgian authorities, apparently concerned about the mine's safety, filled the main uranium shaft with concrete. Congo's war and accompanying lawlessness brought prospectors back in 1998. Miners dug new pits just a couple hundred yards from the rusting, weed-choked uranium factory. Kabila moved against the mine in February to "protect the environment, the population and the world against terrorism," Ndongala said. His ban has never been enforced, however. Ndongala spoke of plans to drive the miners away from Shinkolobwe with soldiers, but said his cash-strapped government "doesn't have the means" to do so. And perhaps, little real incentive. Mining is big business in Congo. Government officials declined to give figures on the cobalt industry, but overall exports - including cobalt, diamonds, copper and coffee - topped $1 billion in 2002. Today at Shinkolobwe, some 5,500 Congolese using shovels, hoes and bare hands haul ores overland to nearby Likasi, where businessmen from Africa, India, China and elsewhere have set up 13 smelting mills. The end product, and just as often the raw material itself, known as heteroginite, is shipped south by road to neighboring Zambia, and then abroad. Industry officials say the heteroginite primarily contains high-grade cobalt. But "trace quantities of uranium are being exported unwittingly" along with it, said Skinner, the mining engineer, a Zimbabwean who is a longtime Congo resident. The diggers, uneducated, hungry and fearful for their jobs, deny any uranium is being mined. Provincial governor Aime Ngoy Mukena confirmed to The Associated Press that the heteroginite contains uranium, but he and other officials declined to say precisely how much. Alex Stewart (Assayers) Ltd., a British-based company that provides lab services to the mining industry, found "a high concentration of the highly radioactive uranium-235 in steels from Shinkolobwe," European Parliament member Bart Staes wrote to the European Commission in 2003. The isotope uranium-235 is needed to support chain reactions in nuclear reactors and weapons. The metal must be refined first, a process called enrichment. Foreign experts say the uranium being dug up at Shinkolobwe is not significant enough to attract terrorists - a basic bomb needs a half-dozen tons of the raw ore. But no one consistently monitors how much is being mined or exported. About 20 state mining police officers are posted at Shinkolobwe, but their main task is to ensure diggers pay their taxes. On the Congolese frontier, underpaid officials are easily bribed to let shipments through. "It's a whole other problem when governments can't control what happens on their own land," said Michael Levi, a science and technology fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. Mukena, the governor, told AP that government experts test all minerals for export, but state labs do not have the means to detect uranium. "There is no local laboratory that can do it," Mukena said, adding that Shinkolobwe was closed partly for that reason. The U.S. government recently sent experts to inspect Shinkolobwe. U.S. Embassy officials in Kinshasa declined to detail their findings. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. organization that monitors nuclear facilities, also has offered to inspect the mines. The government has not taken up the offer, agency spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said by telephone from IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria. The IAEA begins tracking uranium ore only after it has been enriched into weapons-grade material, a process that requires extremely sophisticated technical know-how, Fleming said. "There is a huge, long process you have to go through before it gets to a point of concern for the world," Fleming said. Tom Cochrane, director of the nuclear program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, a Washington-based advocacy group, agreed. Pre-enriched, "it's not very good dirty-bomb material," he said. Levi, however, argued that even small quantities should be tracked. "The assumption in the past was always that you'd have to divert a huge amount of uranium to make a bomb," Levi said from Washington. "But you can do most of the research leading to a bomb with small amounts of uranium. So you can get very far without being detected." Saddam Hussein's intelligence archives show a middleman in Nairobi, Kenya, offered to supply Iraq with Congo uranium in 2000, Newsweek reported in its May 17 issue. A note in the intelligence service's file suggested Iraq was then under too much international scrutiny to pursue the deal but recommended Iraq "maintain contact" with the middleman. The Shinkolobwe mine is not Congo's only nuclear worry. In the capital, an aging, low-power research reactor still operates on an erosion-prone hill at the university. It has been criticized for lax security, and two of its nuclear fuel rods were stolen in the late 1980s. One was later found in Italy. The other remains missing. As for Shinkolobwe, "if there was really a political will to close it, it could be closed in a day," Skinner said. "But everybody is making money out of it, and at the end of the day, that's what it's all about." -- ***************************************************************** 37 JoongAng Daily: 10 localities' voters tender new bids for nuclear waste dump June 2, 2004 KST 11:24 (GMT+9) by Chang Se-jeong ojlee82@joongang.co.kr> 2004.05.31 Residents of 10 counties and cities have submitted bids to host Korea's first permanent nuclear waste disposal site, the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy said yesterday when it closed its acceptance of new bids. According to the ministry, residents of Soryong and Okdo counties in North Jeolla province, Buk-myeon in North Gyeongsang province, Yongsan in South Jeolla province and Seodo in Incheon signed up to host the nuclear dump on the final day. On Saturday residents of five other counties ¡ª Geunnam and Giseong in North Gyeongsang province, Haeri in North Jeolla province and Hongnong and Saengil in South Jeolla province ¡ª had submitted bids. Buan county of North Jeolla province submitted no new bid. Last July, Kim Jong-gyu, the governor of North Jeolla province, asked Seoul to put the site in that county despite strong opposition from some local residents. But the ministry said Buan was also still in the running. All of the regions interested in hosting the nuclear waste facility, which will come with a generous aid package from the central government, were required to submit petitions signed by at least one-third of the area's residents over the age of 20. In Hongnong, South Jeolla province, 68 percent of the voters had agreed to bid. Although the "citizen bidding" period is over, a ministry official said, other areas will have another chance to enter the fray. A second petition, this one from the head of the county government, must be submitted by Sept. 15. The ministry said other counties would get another chance to bid then. The final decision is to be made before the end of the year. ***************************************************************** 38 UPI: Bulgaria signs nuclear waste plant deal - (United Press International) June 01, 2004 Sofia, , Jun. 1 (UPI) -- A German consortium has signed a deal to build a nuclear waste disposal facility in Bulgaria, local media reported Tuesday. The $60 million deal was signed between the Bulgarian nuclear power plant Kozloduy and German firms GNB and RWE Nukem. The nuclear waste facility will become operational sometime in 2008 and will be capable of handling 2,800 storage units for at least 50 years. Bulgaria is scaling down parts of its domestic nuclear power program due to safety concerns. The country hopes to join the European Union in 2007 having missed out on the first round of European Union enlargement on May 1 this year when eight former communist countries became members in the largest ever enlargement wave. Fiercely anti-nuclear Austria has been highly critical of safety standards in former communist countries, although it has not blocked the accession of countries such as the Czech Republic and Slovakia, both of which have nuclear power programs and both of which border Austria. ***************************************************************** 39 startribune: Editorial: Nuclear waste/Best plan: No dregs left behind [http://www.startribune.com] update: June 1, 2004 at 6:33 AM When the U.S. Senate reconvenes today, one of the first issues it is to address is a significant change in the way this nation handles its worst nuclear waste. Senators should not hesitate to reject this ill-advised move. The waste in question is the mostly liquid byproduct of plutonium processing at U.S. weapons plants. Much of it has been collected for temporary storage in tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, the Savannah River facility in South Carolina and the former Idaho National Nuclear Laboratory, now known as INEEL. The ultimate plan is to seal it in glass logs for permanent storage in the vault now planned for Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Deteriorating tanks have begun to leak in Washington and South Carolina, threatening serious contamination of the Columbia and Savannah rivers; INEEL sits atop an aquifer that recharges the Snake River in dry spells. Understandably, the Department of Energy is interested in speeding the cleanup process at all three sites. Incredibly, it has proposed to do so by simply reclassifying some waste so it can be left right where it is. In essence, DOE proposes to extract and encase as much waste as it deems reasonable, then cover the dregs with concrete. It's possible that some solution along these lines might make sense. But as Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., points out, its proponents have failed to provide enough details -- such as the volume of material to be left behind -- to permit an independent scientific review. Moreover, the nature of this waste is such that radioactivity is especially concentrated in the residues. Having failed to negotiate a deal with Cantwell and other like-minded officials, DOE obtained an executive order allowing it to unilaterally reclassify high-level waste at the three repositories, in effect exempting it from the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act, and to withhold cleanup funds from their states if they refused to comply. That effort was struck down in federal court. Now the department quietly attached equivalent provisions to the defense appropriations bill; they are to be voted on as early as today. Cantwell and allies have succeeded in removing Hanford and INEEL from its provisions, and expect they can strip the language permitting fiscal punishment of uncooperative states. But Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., insists on letting his state and the Energy Department cut their own deal on Savannah River (to the consternation of other South Carolinians, including his Democratic colleague, Sen. Fritz Hollings). His arguments are that, first, the cleanup process will be much quicker and cheaper if some waste can be left behind, and, second, that South Carolinians ought to be able to decide what's best for South Carolina. Quicker and cheaper can be valid considerations in planning a pollution cleanup, even when the pollutant is concentrated nuclear waste -- but only after the highest level of safety has been guaranteed. And those guarantees must satisfy national standards, not the terms of a side deal. The idea that U.S. policies on nuclear waste ought to be subject to local-option exemptions is a perennial complication of a process that is already complex enough. In the short run, Graham's accommodation of the Energy Department's new agenda is a bad idea for South Carolina (and Georgia, which shares the Savannah River). It would also set a troubling precedent for waste handling in other states, beginning with Washington and Idaho, but conceivably extending to every other state with nuclear waste, military or civilian, in temporary storage. If shortcuts can be taken at Savannah River, why not Prairie Island? [Star Tribune] © 2004 Star Tribune. All rights reserved. [The McClatchy Company] feedback terms of use privacy policy member center [http://www.startribunecompany.com] ***************************************************************** 40 KoreaTimes: 11 Counties Vie for Nuclear Waste Site Hankooki.com > Korea Times By Kim Tae-gyu Staff Reporter To the relief of the government, as many as 10 counties had filed petitions to accommodate the long-overdue nuclear waste site by the final deadline on Monday. A total of 11 candidates will compete for the nuclear dump site, including Puan of South Cholla Province, where residents will conduct a poll to decide whether to offer a bid for the project. The Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy (MOCIE) announced yesterday nine counties in Cholla and Kyongsang provinces had submitted petitions carrying signatures from more than one-third of adults aged above 20. The regions include Soryong-dong and Okto-myon in Kunsan, North Cholla Province, Hongnong-up in Yongkwang, Saengil-myon in Wando, Haeri-myon in Kochang and Yongsan-myon in Changhung, South Cholla Province. Sodo-myon in Kanghwa, Inchon Metropolitan City, Kisong-myon, Kunnam-myon and Puk-myon in Uljin, North Kyongsang Province, also threw in their hats. ``This is encouraging because we expected just four or five regions would apply. We think the long-overdue nuclear dump project will be finally complete by the end of this year,¡¯¡¯ an MOCIE official said. The number of candidates may increase as local governments have another chance to place preliminary applications by September 15 after acquiring the signatures of more than one-third of the population or local parliament¡¯s approval. Among all the applicants, only those regions receiving support from a majority in local voting with more than one-third of the population taking part will be entitled to place final bids, due by the end of November. If multiple hopefuls are eligible, a screening committee will make the final decision before the end of the year. Korea has sought to designate a nuclear waste site since 1986, but attempts have been continually frustrated by the desperate opposition of local residents. Most recently, the government tried to build a nuclear waste site in Wido, an islet off Puan, but massive demonstrations forced the government to back down. Currently, the decision whether to apply to house the site will be determined by Puan residents through a vote, which will be conducted before the firm-bid dead line of November. South Korea retains 18 nuclear reactors in four regions and currently stores nuclear waste at interim repositories, full capacity of which is expected to be reached by around 2008. voc200@koreatimes.co.kr 05-31-2004 22:30 ***************************************************************** 41 AU ABC: Govt clarifies waste transport risk » "Australian Broadcasting Corporation [http://abc.net.au/] Tuesday, 1 June 2004 The Victorian Government says the dangers of transporting toxic waste along the Calder Highway between Melbourne and Mildura, in the state's north-west, must be put into perspective. The Calder Highway improvement committee wants the industrial waste shipped by rail to a proposed dump in the Mallee to reduce the risk of a contamination spill. But the Transport and Major Events Minister Peter Batchelor says the highway is more likely to be used and could involve up to 10 trucks a day. He says the road transport of diesel and agricultural chemicals is a bigger danger than the industrial waste. "It will be dried, it will be contained in a truck and it won't be flammable," he said. "It's not radioactive and the sorts of things that people are concerned about, they won't be going to this facility in that form or they won't be going there at all." [ more news ] Last Updated: 8:39:00 AM (AEST) [http://www.abc.net.au ***************************************************************** 42 Hanford New: Nuclear stockpile stewards devise new tests [http://www.hanfordnews.com] May 31st 2004 By The Associated Press NEVADA TEST SITE, Nev. - At ground zero for the nation's nuclear testing, the stewards of the atomic stockpile stopped creating mushroom clouds and craters more than a decade ago. Now they devise complex underground experiments using radar, laser and X-ray imaging to explore the finer points of how plutonium performs in an explosion. Scientists call the experiments "subcritical" because they don't set off thermonuclear blasts like those that rocked the Nevada desert northwest of Las Vegas from 1951 to 1992. "When you had the nuclear test, what was the proof? It exploded," said James Danneskiold, a spokesman for Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, where plutonium triggers for bombs are produced. "Now, you have to ask the necessary questions to show that the weapon still functions as it was designed," Danneskiold said, "that it's safe, reliable, and will work when needed." The experiments subject plutonium "pits" like those at the core of nuclear weapons to stresses that scientists say only high explosives can produce. They don't detonate the radioactive element, but collect data about how it would explode. Contamination is a risk. Darwin Morgan, spokesman for the National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency that oversees the site, said no plutonium detonations have occurred and no radioactivity has been released during 20 previous subcritical tests. Remoteness was a factor when the Nevada Test Site was established in 1950 by President Harry Truman. The site encompasses 1,375 square miles, nearly the size of Rhode Island, and is surrounded on three sides by the 4,562-square-mile Nellis Air Force Base bombing range. Combined, the federal reservation is larger than the state of Connecticut. A short distance from the underground test laboratory is the Frenchman Flat dry lake bed, where the first of 1,021 Nevada nuclear weapons tests was conducted. After 14 atmospheric and five underground tests, Frenchman Flat remains strewn with structures built in the 1950s to measure the effects of primitive nuclear blasts. Steel reinforcement bars from a crumbled concrete dome curl like hair blown back. Rusting pens mark where pigs dressed in Army uniforms were subjected to shock, heat and radiation waves. Warped wooden benches sit on a knoll where VIPs watched detonations from only nine miles away. Before boarding a steel cage elevator for the 75-second descent down a mine shaft to the lab, Ghazar Papazian, Los Alamos project director at the test site, characterized the safety zones of the laboratory as a "nested bottle concept." "If the first cork leaks, the second can contain it. If the second leaks, the third can contain it," he said, pointing to escape routes on a three-dimensional mock-up of one mile of underground tunnels. At the underground lab, a vault 300 feet deep is filled with concrete where the 20 kiloton Ledoux underground nuclear test was conducted in September 1990. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, in World War II measured 16 kilotons. Other sealed vaults entomb most of the 20 previous subcritical experiments, and quarter-inch steel doors can be closed to seal tunnel sections like compartments in a submarine. Rubber-soled shoes squeak on painted gray cement floors. "Armando," an upcoming test, is the third in a series. Its predecessors, "Mario" and "Rocco" in August and September 2002, were conducted in six-foot diameter wells drilled 35 feet deep beneath the tunnel floor of one finger of the complex. The upcoming detonation 963 feet underground will involve high explosives inside a steel sphere that would fit in the back of a pickup. Cameras, lasers and a special high-intensity X-ray focusing 2 million volts of electricity will beam through the sphere to measure temperature, pressure and velocity, and any microwaves the plutonoium gives off. The tunnels will be cleared of workers, while diagnostic equipment shielded in tractor-trailer sized containers collect data. After the test, the area will be swept for radiation before anyone returns. "Armando" is designed to answer questions about how plutonium ages and whether weapons triggers produced by milling or casting processes perform the same, Papazian said. Production of weapons-grade plutonium was suspended in 1989 at a mill in Rocky Flats, near Denver. A cast process at Los Alamos, N.M., is expected to resume producing 10 plutonium pits a year by 2007, Danneskiold said. Tests also seek to determine "if things designed for 20 to 30 years can last for 40 to 60 years," Papazian said. Experiments can cost up to $40 million each, compared with $90 million apiece for full-fledged underground nuclear tests. Papazian said he did not know what "Armando" would cost. Test site officials call the program "stockpile stewardship" - essential to the U.S. policy of nuclear deterrence. Critics call it unnecessary. "They're still doing bomb testing," complained Peggy Maze Johnson, director of Citizen Alert, a Nevada anti-nuclear advocacy group. The number of U.S. warheads is classified. The Natural Resources Defense Council, which has monitored nuclear issues since 1970, estimates the United States has about 10,400 warheads - about half the nuclear weapons in the world. Morgan said nuclear tests are strictly defined by international treaty. "We do experiments," he said. "There's no sustained nuclear reaction." The work has taken on new emphasis with the Bush administration seeking to cut the lead time needed to resume full-scale underground nuclear testing from in half, to 18 months. The United States has observed a nuclear testing moratorium since 1992, but has not ratified the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. © 2004 Tri-City Herald. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 43 Boston Globe / Opinion: A nuclear band-aid Boston.com A nuclear band-aid Boston Globe IF THE SENATE isn't careful, it could vote this week to allow the Department of Energy to cover some of the nation's most hazardous nuclear waste with grout instead of treating it properly and eventually entombing it in a proper waste depository. The material, left over from Cold War weapons production, sits in huge tanks in South Carolina and Western ... June 1, 2004 --> See all stories on this topic: SRI Lankan nuclear suspect held in Malaysia Radio Australia - Australia A Malaysian rights group has condemned the use of a harsh security law to detain a Sri Lankan alleged to be involved in an international nuclear blackmarket. ... See all stories on this topic: CORRECTED - Cameco not to acquire stake in Texas Nuclear plant Forbes - USA In TORONTO item headlined "Cameco not to acquire stake in Texas Nuclear plant" please read in third paragraph "...announced a $333 million agreement ... See all stories on this topic: VANUNU: Exposing Israel's nuclear secrets was not betrayal Ha'aretz - Israel In his first interview since his release last month after 18 years in jail for revealing Israel's nuclear secrets, Mordechai Vanunu told the BBC in an ... See all stories on this topic: KERRY to pay more attention to nuclear issues in ties with Russia ITAR-TASS - Moscow,Russia NEW YORK, May 31 (Itar-Tass) - John Kerry, the US Democratic Party presidential candidate, has promised to give more attention to nuclear issues in relations ... See all stories on this topic: QUAKES Cause Public Fears About Nuclear Plant Safety Korea Times - Seoul,South Korea Saturday’s strong earthquake and aftershocks have set off public fears about the safety of nuclear power plants in North Kyongsang Province, close to the ... See all stories on this topic: NORTH Korea accuses US of concocting nuclear program as pretext ... Billings Gazette - Billings,MT,USA SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - North Korea on Monday accused the Bush administration of making up reports about the North's nuclear weapons program as a pretext for ... See all stories on this topic: BRASH urged to reveal nuclear policy NZ City - New Zealand NZ First leader Winston Peters wants Don Brash to assure New Zealanders he has no intention of suggesting a change to our nuclear free legislation before he ... See all stories on this topic: NUCLEAR parts reached Libya after a US raid International Herald Tribune - Paris,France In March, just as the US government was showing reporters some of the sensitive nuclear equipment that Libya gave up after renouncing its weapons program, the ... See all stories on this topic: This daily-once News Alert is brought to you by Google News (BETA)... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Remove this News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts/remove?s=92d1672a1b037a07&hl=en Create another News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts?hl=en Try Google News: http://news.google.com/ ***************************************************************** 45 Google News Alert - nuclear Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT) KERRY Vows Action on Threat of Nuclear Terrorism Wired News - USA By Patricia Wilson. WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (Reuters) - Democratic candidate John Kerry on Tuesday proposed to combat the threat of nuclear terrorism by securing ... See all stories on this topic: NUCLEAR power 'too big' for NZ New Zealand Herald - Auckland,New Zealand By SIMON COLLINS science reporter. The head of the Government-appointed Electricity Commission, Roy Hemmingway, says New Zealand is too small for nuclear power. ... See all stories on this topic: TIGHTENING security at Tennessee nuclear facility Scripps Howard News Service - USA By FRANK MUNGER. OAK RIDGE, Tenn. - Under pressure to terror-proof the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant at Oak Ridge, contractors are hiring more guards and ... See all stories on this topic: ELBARADEI says " jury out " on Iran's nuclear plans Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK BRATISLAVA, June 1 (Reuters) - The head of the UN nuclear watchdog said on Tuesday his inspectors had found no clear proof of a military dimension to Iran's ... See all stories on this topic: IAEA Inspectors Visit Heavy Water Nuclear Installations in Arak Merh News Agency - Tehran,Iran TEHRAN, June 1 (MNA) -- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors visited the heavy water nuclear installations in Arak for the first time last ... See all stories on this topic: ASIA turns to nuclear to fight power shortages Financial Times - London,England,UK Designers and developers of nuclear power stations seeking career opportunities at the beginning of the 21st century are looking to Asia. ... See all stories on this topic: AEP reaches new deal for Texas nuclear plant Columbus Business First - Columbus,OH,USA American Electric Power Company Inc.'s deal to sell a nuclear power plant in Texas has been headed off at the pass. AEP had planned ... See all stories on this topic: UN Would Sanction Military Link In Tehran ’ s Nuclear Program DefenseNews.com (subscription) - USA UN atomic energy agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei said June 1 the jury was still out on Iran’s nuclear program but that he would not hesitate to recommend ... SIX arrests in nuclear break-in BBC News - London,England,UK Six peace activists have been arrested at one of Britain's key sites for the production of nuclear warheads. The protesters, from ... See all stories on this topic: IRAN official denies 'nuclear relations' with North Korea USA Today - USA SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Iran said Tuesday it has never received nuclear technology from communist North Korea. "We never had ... See all stories on this topic: This daily-once News Alert is brought to you by Google News (BETA)... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Remove this News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts/remove?s=92d1672a1b037a07&hl=en Create another News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts?hl=en Try Google News: http://news.google.com/ ***************************************************************** 46 New York Times: Looking for Some Help for Love Canal's Other Site Dan Cappellazzo for The New York Times Luella Kenny, 67, at the Love Canal site. She moved after her son died. By ANTHONY DePALMA Published: June 1, 2004 [N] IAGARA FALLS, N.Y. - Niagara's rush and roar have long drawn both visionaries and hucksters, but few ever matched the audacity of William T. Love, a fast-talking drifter who vowed in 1893 to build a canal linking this city to a fertile field seven miles away and there erect "the most perfect city in existence." Just a small section of canal was dug, but today the two places that would have been connected by water are bound instead by a pair of environmental nightmares that arose from the ruins of Mr. Love's grandiose dream. Near the southeastern end of this city lies the infamous Love Canal, the remnant of Mr. Love's doomed plan where tons of toxic chemicals were dumped. Federal environmental officials recently declared a formal end to the Love Canal cleanup, though monitoring continues. But there is no end in sight for the problems that have arisen at what would have been the northern terminus of Mr. Love's canal. He called the area Model City, and now it contains one of the largest hazardous-waste landfill sites in the country, right next to a government storage site containing radioactive residues from the construction of the first atomic bomb. In Model City, as in Love Canal, questions are being asked about fault and fairness. While the federal government's actions to clean up the Love Canal hazards appear to be finally approaching an end, the people who live in the Model City area face a struggle just to get officials to heed their calls for help. "To the government, there are no health issues, no economic issues, no community issues," said Vincent Agnello, who leads a group of local residents fighting the landfill, run by Chemical Waste Management, Inc. and known around town as C.W.M. To the government, "This is just a great place to dump," he said. Substantial changes in attitudes and regulations help explain the disparity between the two communities. The chemical dump at Love Canal was ancient by modern standards. It was no more than the open pit left by Mr. Love when dumping started in 1942, and it had none of the safety features now required by the federal Environmental Protection Agency. The chemical landfill in Model City, by contrast, was acquired by Chemical Waste in 1984 and is far more technologically advanced and more closely regulated. State and federal environmental officials insist that the waste sites in Model City pose no threat to nearby residents. "The C.W.M. operation is run properly," said Walter E. Mugdan, regional director of environmental planning and protection for the Environmental Protection Agency. "It does not represent an inappropriate level of risk." That assurance, however, means little to the people living around Model City. Having watched the intensive government effort to clean up Love Canal, residents of Model City expected the same diligence in their area and are increasingly frustrated that it has not materialized. "The whole history of Love Canal has left a legacy of distrust," said Sean Q. Kelly, an associate professor of political science at Niagara University. "When the government comes in and says there's no problem in a place like Model City, people don't believe it." While Love Canal's origins are now largely forgotten, the horrors of what came later are well known. The Hooker Chemical Company of Niagara Falls used it as a dumping ground. The canal was capped in the early 1950's and sold to the city for $1. In the 1970's, water seeped through the broken cap and forced chemicals into the basements of homes that had been built near the canal. Residents organized and demanded action, which provided the catalyst for passage of the federal Superfund law to identify and clean up the worst industrial pollution sites in the country. Some residents - the ones who, like 78-year-old Sam Giarrizzo, never considered the canal all that dangerous to begin with - were relieved when the Environmental Protection Agency said in March that the $400 million cleanup was over. A resident of the Love Canal neighborhood since 1957, Mr. Giarrizzo never moved. But while some of the contaminated houses have been bulldozed and lie buried beneath the surface along with the 20,000 tons of hazardous chemicals that could not be removed, Mr. Love's dream-turned-nightmare lives on. "You never get rid of Love Canal," Mr. Giarrizzo said of the lingering atmosphere of doubt. "We'll have it forever." Although the city of Niagara Falls is trying to erase the memory of these problems - even renaming the Love Canal neighborhood Black Creek Village - residents are bracing for a new round of controversy. Sometime next year, the State Department of Health is expected to release the results of an epidemiological study of 6,000 people who lived in the Love Canal neighborhood from the 1940's to the late 1970's. That study is examining the rates of cancer, mortality and birth defects among those residents and comparing them with the rates in the rest of Niagara County and the state. Luella Kenny, 67, moved from Love Canal to nearby Grand Island two decades ago after Jon, her 7-year-old son, died of a kidney ailment. She believes Love Canal chemicals that seeped into a creek behind her house made him ill. Mrs. Kenny, who is participating in the state study, said she feared that it might turn out to be inconclusive, which would allow detractors to claim that Love Canal had never presented any real danger. "If you take down Love Canal, you take down everything," she said. "All the grassroots groups fighting around the country would be undone." One of those community environmental groups is in Model City, where the grimy front windows of the Model City Country Inn look out on a steady stream of trucks loaded with waste headed to either the Chemical Waste Management landfill or a huge garbage dump next to it. The Chemical Waste site is the only commercial hazardous waste landfill in the Northeast and contains some of the contaminated soil from Love Canal. State and federal officials consider the Chemical Waste site to be well run and have no objections to its continued operation. But William C. Roland, a local resident, thinks 62 years of being dumped on is enough. He belongs to Residents for Responsible Government, which fears that the site's operation has harmed the health of people living nearby. During a recent public hearing, which drew more than 650 residents, he said he has taken cues from Lois Gibbs, the Love Canal resident who received national attention for her cleanup demands by refusing to allow a federal official to leave a meeting until some action was taken. "We wanted to do this professionally," Mr. Roland said, "but if we have to do what Lois Gibbs did, we will." Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************