***************************************************************** 05/24/04 **** RADIATION BULLETIN(RADBULL) **** VOL 12.124 ***************************************************************** RADBULL IS PRODUCED BY THE ABALONE ALLIANCE CLEARINGHOUSE ***************************************************************** Send News Stories to news@energy-net.org with title on subject line and first line of body NUCLEAR POLICY 1 UK Independent: debate by green groups 2 James Lovelock: Nuclear power is the only green solution 3 [du-list] Iran submits report on nuclear programme to UN agency 4 Reuters: Iran Bars UN from Military Sites - Diplomats 5 AFP: EU and IAEA would also pay the price if Iran's cooperation fail 6 Korea Herald: 'New terms needed in N.K. nuke talks' 7 ITAR-TASS: Russia calls for giving security guarantees to Pyongyang 8 Guardian Unlimited: North Korean nuclear trade exposed 9 asahi.com: EDITORIAL: The Pyongyang summit 10 asahi.com: ANALYSIS: Kim secures the biggest gain by giving the smal 11 AFP: UN nuclear watchdog investigating possible NKorea nuclear 12 US: LAT: Case Reveals Nuts and Bolts of Nuclear Network, Officials S 13 US: AP Wire: Energy Department helps pay for Alabama nuclear reactor 14 [progchat_action] Nuclear marketplace 15 Haaretz: Vanunu shows up in court for libel suit against Yedioth dai 16 Guardian Unlimited: Israeli Nuclear Spy Appears in Court 17 TCJ: Krieger: Berkeley should forsake its nukes 05/24/04 18 CS Monitor: Keeping Track of Uranium | NUCLEAR REACTORS 19 US: [NukeNet] good information on new nuclear consortia 20 UPI: Slovakia to complete nuclear power facility - 21 Daily Yomiuri: G-8 to confirm export ban on nations not signing addi 22 US: Times Leader: Where feathers, fission coexist 23 Slovak news: Rusko wants to complete two blocs of Mochovce nuclear p 24 US: U.S. Newswire: DOE Announces Study of Advanced New Nuclear Power 25 US: Free Lance-Star: Lake Anna doesn't need any more nuclear reactor NUCLEAR SAFETY 26 [du-list] Chris Busby on Uranium Health Effects 27 [du-list] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq 28 [du-list] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq 29 US: NPR : Getting to the Bottom of Perchlorate 30 St. Petersburg Times: Decommissioning Awaits Akula Subs - 31 US: Gallup Independent: RECA Hearing - Part 1 32 PRAVDA.Ru: The US uses depleted uranium weapons in Iraq - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE 33 Las Vegas SUN: Reid works on transportation bill NUCLEAR WEAPONS US DEPT. OF ENERGY 34 UPI: Energy Dept. announces nuke plant study - ( 35 Oak Ridger: State, ORNL project good idea 36 Las Vegas SUN: Nuclear experiment planned at Nevada Test Site OTHER NUCLEAR 37 [du-list] June 3rd: Celebrate 23rd Anniversary of Peace Park 38 Google News Alert - nuclear ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** FULL NEWS STORIES ***************************************************************** ***************************************************************** 1 UK Independent: debate by green groups By Charles Arthur Technology Editor 25 May 2004 A former Labour energy minister and the nuclear industry both welcomed the call by the scientist James Lovelock yesterday for a massive expansion of the nuclear industry to combat global warming. They also forecast that Professor Lovelock's dramatic call, in yesterday's Independent, would force more environmentalists to consider whether nuclear power really posed a greater threat to humanity than climate change - and that they too would eventually agree with the celebrated scientist. Professor Lovelock's radical suggestion provoked widespread debate yesterday, with both Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace rejecting his claims. However Brian Wilson, who stood down as energy minister last year to become the Prime Minister's special representative on overseas trade, said Professor Lovelock had had the courage to address the question of global warming honestly. "I hope that many others will follow him in questioning the basis of their hostility to nuclear power in the age of global warming." Mr Wilson said it was "a self-evident nonsense" for the UK to run down its nuclear capacity at the same time that there was an unprecedented emphasis on the need to reduce carbon emissions. "Nuclear power is our only significant source of non-carbon electricity. It is the bird in the hand yet the Green lobby wants to shoot it." At the Nuclear Industry Association, which lobbies in favour of nuclear power, Simon James said: "It's self-evident to us that nuclear power can deliver large amounts of energy without producing the carbon dioxide that contributes to global warming. "We believe we are winning the argument. Increasingly people are looking at this and saying 'Hang on, if we're serious about global warming we need to do something serious about converting large amounts of energy to non-carbon-producing sources. "Environmentalists are seeing this. I wouldn't be at all surprised if this article means more environmentalists come out backing Professor Lovelock," Mr James said. As the creator of the Gaia hypothesis - which suggests that the Earth acts as a single organism - Professor Lovelock, 84, has a mythic place in the Green movement. But in yesterday's Independent he argued that a massive expansion of nuclear power as the world's main energy source is necessary to prevent climate change overwhelming civilisation in the next 50 years. Some environmentalists see that as a dramatic volte-face, because nuclear fission produces radioactive waste that remains dangerous for thousands of years and requires special storage and disposal. Environmental groups have thus lobbied - and frequently acted - against nuclear power wherever possible. However, a growing number of scientific bodies, including most recently the Royal Academy of Engineering, have concluded that nuclear power does represent the best compromise between risk and power output, given the world's growing demand for energy. In his article calling for a fresh look at nuclear power, Professor Lovelock considers - and rejects - other options for generating power and criticises the Green movement's rejection of it. He also accuses the group of forgetting the lesson of the Gaia concept. "Every year that we continue burning carbon makes it worse for our descendants and for civilisation ... The Green lobbies, which should have given priority to global warming, seem more concerned about threats to people than with threats to Earth, not noticing that we are part of the Earth and wholly dependent upon its well-being." Public attention to global warming and climate change has been heightened by Sir David King, the Government's chief scientist, who has repeatedly said that global warming poses a greater threat to the world than terrorism. A new Hollywood blockbuster, The Day After Tomorrow, also uses dramatic effects of global warming as the essence of its plot - a move that environmentalists have said should raise the importance of the topic in people's consciousness. UK Independent Ltd. ***************************************************************** 2 James Lovelock: Nuclear power is the only green solution [http://www.independent.co.uk] We have no time to experiment with visionary energy sources; civilisation is in imminent danger 24 May 2004 Sir David King, the Government's chief scientist, was far-sighted to say that global warming is a more serious threat than terrorism. He may even have underestimated, because, since he spoke, new evidence of climate change suggests it could be even more serious, and the greatest danger that civilisation has faced so far. Most of us are aware of some degree of warming; winters are warmer and spring comes earlier. But in the Arctic, warming is more than twice as great as here in Europe and in summertime, torrents of melt water now plunge from Greenland's kilometre-high glaciers. The complete dissolution of Greenland's icy mountains will take time, but by then the sea will have risen seven metres, enough to make uninhabitable all of the low lying coastal cities of the world, including London, Venice, Calcutta, New York and Tokyo. Even a two metre rise is enough to put most of southern Florida under water. The floating ice of the Arctic Ocean is even more vulnerable to warming; in 30 years, its white reflecting ice, the area of the US, may become dark sea that absorbs the warmth of summer sunlight, and further hastens the end of the Greenland ice. The North Pole, goal of so many explorers, will then be no more than a point on the ocean surface. Not only the Arctic is changing; climatologists warn a four-degree rise in temperature is enough to eliminate the vast Amazon forests in a catastrophe for their people, their biodiversity, and for the world, which would lose one of its great natural air conditioners. The scientists who form the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported in 2001 that global temperature would rise between two and six degrees Celsius by 2100. Their grim forecast was made perceptible by last summer's excessive heat; and according to Swiss meteorologists, the Europe-wide hot spell that killed over 20,000 was wholly different from any previous heat wave. The odds against it being a mere deviation from the norm were 300,000 to one. It was a warning of worse to come. What makes global warming so serious and so urgent is that the great Earth system, Gaia, is trapped in a vicious circle of positive feedback. Extra heat from any source, whether from greenhouse gases, the disappearance of Arctic ice or the Amazon forest, is amplified, and its effects are more than additive. It is almost as if we had lit a fire to keep warm, and failed to notice, as we piled on fuel, that the fire was out of control and the furniture had ignited. When that happens, little time is left to put out the fire before it consumes the house. Global warming, like a fire, is accelerating and almost no time is left to act. So what should we do? We can just continue to enjoy a warmer 21st century while it lasts, and make cosmetic attempts, such as the Kyoto Treaty, to hide the political embarrassment of global warming, and this is what I fear will happen in much of the world. When, in the 18th century, only one billion people lived on Earth, their impact was small enough for it not to matter what energy source they used. But with six billion, and growing, few options remain; we can not continue drawing energy from fossil fuels and there is no chance that the renewables, wind, tide and water power can provide enough energy and in time. If we had 50 years or more we might make these our main sources. But we do not have 50 years; the Earth is already so disabled by the insidious poison of greenhouse gases that even if we stop all fossil fuel burning immediately, the consequences of what we have already done will last for 1,000 years. Every year that we continue burning carbon makes it worse for our descendants and for civilisation. Worse still, if we burn crops grown for fuel this could hasten our decline. Agriculture already uses too much of the land needed by the Earth to regulate its climate and chemistry. A car consumes 10 to 30 times as much carbon as its driver; imagine the extra farmland required to feed the appetite of cars. By all means, let us use the small input from renewables sensibly, but only one immediately available source does not cause global warming and that is nuclear energy. True, burning natural gas instead of coal or oil releases only half as much carbon dioxide, but unburnt gas is 25 times as potent a greenhouse agent as is carbon dioxide. Even a small leakage would neutralise the advantage of gas. The prospects are grim, and even if we act successfully in amelioration, there will still be hard times, as in war, that will stretch our grandchildren to the limit. We are tough and it would take more than the climate catastrophe to eliminate all breeding pairs of humans; what is at risk is civilisation. As individual animals we are not so special, and in some ways are like a planetary disease, but through civilisation we redeem ourselves and become a precious asset for the Earth; not least because through our eyes the Earth has seen herself in all her glory. There is a chance we may be saved by an unexpected event such as a series of volcanic eruptions severe enough to block out sunlight and so cool the Earth. But only losers would bet their lives on such poor odds. Whatever doubts there are about future climates, there are no doubts that greenhouse gases and temperatures both are rising. We have stayed in ignorance for many reasons; important among them is the denial of climate change in the US where governments have failed to give their climate scientists the support they needed. The Green lobbies, which should have given priority to global warming, seem more concerned about threats to people than with threats to the Earth, not noticing that we are part of the Earth and wholly dependent upon its well being. It may take a disaster worse than last summer's European deaths to wake us up. Opposition to nuclear energy is based on irrational fear fed by Hollywood-style fiction, the Green lobbies and the media. These fears are unjustified, and nuclear energy from its start in 1952 has proved to be the safest of all energy sources. We must stop fretting over the minute statistical risks of cancer from chemicals or radiation. Nearly one third of us will die of cancer anyway, mainly because we breathe air laden with that all pervasive carcinogen, oxygen. If we fail to concentrate our minds on the real danger, which is global warming, we may die even sooner, as did more than 20,000 unfortunates from overheating in Europe last summer. I find it sad and ironic that the UK, which leads the world in the quality of its Earth and climate scientists, rejects their warnings and advice, and prefers to listen to the Greens. But I am a Green and I entreat my friends in the movement to drop their wrongheaded objection to nuclear energy. Even if they were right about its dangers, and they are not, its worldwide use as our main source of energy would pose an insignificant threat compared with the dangers of intolerable and lethal heat waves and sea levels rising to drown every coastal city of the world. We have no time to experiment with visionary energy sources; civilisation is in imminent danger and has to use nuclear - the one safe, available, energy source - now or suffer the pain soon to be inflicted by our outraged planet. The writer is an independent scientist and the creator of the Gaia hypothesis of the Earth as a self-regulating organism. © 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd ***************************************************************** 3 [du-list] Iran submits report on nuclear programme to UN agency Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:31 -0700 Iran submits report on nuclear programme to UN agency 22 May 2004 2244 hrs - AFP http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/86321/1/.html VIENNA : Iran has submitted a more than 1,000-page report on its contested nuclear programme to the UN atomic agency, which is investigating US charges that Tehran is secretly developing nuclear weapons, Iranian ambassador Pirooz Hosseini told AFP. He said the report was submitted late Friday to the Vienna headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency, in comments confirmed by the IAEA. The report follows one by Iran last October that failed to live up to Iranian promises to fully disclose its nuclear activities. The United States claims Iran is hiding a programme to build the bomb and has called for the IAEA to refer it to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. But diplomats said the new declaration had come too late for the IAEA to be able to evaluate it fully before a meeting of the agency's 35-nation board of governors in mid-June. The IAEA will not be able to make a final finding on Iran due to delays by Tehran in allowing international inspections and disclosing its nuclear activities, diplomats said. "This is ironic since the Iranians are the ones who want the file on them to be closed," said a diplomat close to the IAEA and who asked not to be named. IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky said the Iranians had filed their report under an additional protocol to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that mandates tougher inspections. "This declaration should provide information about Iran's nuclear and nuclear-related activities and will facilitate the IAEA's assessment of the correctness and completeness of information already provided by Iran on its past and present nuclear activities," Gwozdecky said. Hosseini said that even though the Iranian parliament has not yet ratified the protocol which Iran signed on December 18, Iran had "decided to apply it voluntarily as a confidence-building measure" and was filing the report that is required within six months under the protocol. He said the declaration gave "information related to our 10-year research and development program with regard to the nuclear fuel cycle and related technologies." Iran claims it is embarked on a project solely to develop nuclear energy for peaceful electricity production and that it seeks to enrich uranium as fuel for reactors. Hosseini did not provide details of whether Iran had answered such key IAEA questions as the extent of technology it may have developed with sophisticated P2 centrifuges that can be used to enrich uranium to bomb-grade levels. He said the report had provided information on "the capacity of uranium mines" in Iran, and, regarding nuclear installations, given "a description of each building and places in sites that have been declared to the agency" as well as "information related to past activities." Hosseini said Iran had also supplied "the names of hospitals and universities" using depleted uranium, a by-product from uranium enrichment. IAEA inspectors see a pattern of radiation contamination in Iran which could indicate attempts to enrich uranium to bomb-grade level, diplomats close to the agency have told AFP. IAEA inspectors have reported two such concentrations -- at a Kalaye Electric Company workshop in Tehran and at the Natanz pilot fuel enrichment plant 250 kilometres (150 miles) south of the Iranian capital. Diplomats have confirmed to AFP that other sites have been found. But they have not provided details, and one diplomat downplayed the possibility that the IAEA has found a "smoking gun" to prove Iran is secretly developing nuclear weapons. Iran claims the contamination from particles of enriched uranium is from equipment they imported through an international black market. IAEA inspectors are completing months of investigations in order to prepare a report for a meeting of the agency board that begins in Vienna on June 14. During a visit by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei to Tehran in April, Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi had said Tehran expected the IAEA probe to be completed in June. But an earlier delay to a crucial round of inspections in March "threw us out of sequence," an official close to the IAEA said. Iran delayed inspections after the IAEA board in March condemned the country for failing to report key activities, particularly its acquiring of blueprints for the sophisticated centrifuges. -- Posted for educational and research purposes only, ~ in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 ~ NucNews Links and Expanded Archives - http://nucnews.net ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 4 Reuters: Iran Bars UN from Military Sites - Diplomats Mon May 24, 2004 03:52 PM ET By Louis Charbonneau VIENNA, Austria (Reuters) - Several Western diplomats on the board of the U.N. nuclear watchdog accused Iran of barring U.N. inspectors from military sites, but Tehran said the agency was getting full access inside the Islamic republic. Diplomats who follow the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said IAEA inspectors had been prevented from inspecting around a dozen workshops at three locations. "They have yet to allow access to the military sites," one Western diplomat said. "This will probably be the topic of one of the inspection visits" by IAEA officials. "They (Iranian officials) have been obstructing visits to military sites," said another diplomat, adding U.N. inspectors were being escorted by members of Iran's Revolutionary Guards. The United States says Iran has two nuclear programs -- a public one it has declared to the U.N. and a secret one aimed at developing atomic weapons. Tehran rejects this charge, saying its plans are limited to the peaceful generation of electricity. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations in Vienna, Pirooz Hosseini, denied that the IAEA was facing access problems. "This is not correct information ... from these unnamed diplomats," Hosseini told Reuters, adding that there were "discussions" between Tehran and the United Nations about site access. "They're not problems. (The IAEA) will have access to the sites they want to visit. Everything is going in a smooth way." IAEA officials declined comment. But a third diplomat close to the IAEA said the agency had the right only to what is called "managed access" to sensitive sites, not the "anytime, anywhere" powers U.N. weapons inspectors had in Iraq. A fourth Western diplomat said any delays caused by discussion of "managed access" would only deepen suspicions that Iran is hiding something. Iran's got to throw open the doors," the diplomat said. The IAEA began looking closely at Iran after an exiled Iranian opposition group said in August 2002 Tehran was hiding a massive uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and other facilities from the U.N. Iran later declared these sites to the IAEA. NO HARD EVIDENCE "There's a general hardening of opinion" against Iran on the 35-nation IAEA governing board, the second diplomat said. "The pattern of behavior suggests they're trying to hide something." However, he acknowledged there was no hard evidence that Iran was concealing anything, just suspicions. He said a number of countries wanted IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei to criticize Iran's less-than-adequate cooperation in his new report on Iran, due out soon. But he said ElBaradei, concerned about Tehran's reaction, was putting up resistance. The diplomat close to the IAEA disagreed, saying ElBaradei felt strongly about the importance of the IAEA being objective and would not withhold criticism for fear of anyone's reaction. The first diplomat said Iran may grant the IAEA inspectors access to the sites right before ElBaradei's report comes out -- so ElBaradei would not need not to mention access problems. ElBaradei's report will be discussed at a meeting of the IAEA's board of governors beginning on June 14, at which the United States is expected to push hard for a resolution that harshly condemns Iran's nuclear program. c Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved. Printer Friendly | Email Article | Purchase for Reprint --> 1 | 2 Next More Top News [ border=] Bush Tries to Allay Mounting Doubts Over Iraq [ border=] Prosecutors: Nichols Was Oklahoma City Bomb Driving Force [ border=] U.S. Floats UN Draft on Iraq Future; U.S. Troops Stay [ border=] Gasoline Price at Record $2.064/Gallon [ border=] U.S. Army Suspends General in Iraq Jail-Abuse Probe [ border=] MORE[ border=] [ border=] [ border=] [http://www.reuters.com] Help &Info. | Contact Us | Feedback | [http://www.microsite.reuters.com/MediaKit/index.html] | Disclaimer | Copyright | Privacy | Corrections | Partner Newspapers ***************************************************************** 5 AFP: EU and IAEA would also pay the price if Iran's cooperation fails : Kharazi [http://www.spacewar.com/] TEHRAN (AFP) May 24, 2004 Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazi warned the European Union and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) they would have a lot to lose if their cooperation with the Islamic Republic fails, the students news agency ISNA reported Monday. "The European side has not forgotten its commitments towards Iran's nuclear case, this is a common project, that is, if Iran fails, the EU and the IAEA will suffer losses as well," Kharazi was quoted as saying. Iran pledged full transparency and cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog on its nuclear activities during a visit by British, French and German foreign ministers last October. It expects the EU in return to oppose US pressures in the IAEA to take Iran's nuclear programme -- which Washington believes is a cover for weapons development -- to the United Nations Security Council. "We intend to show our transparency and goodwill by handing in this 1,000 page report", Kharazi said, "and gradually everyone will realise that Iran means to use the nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has no secret plans." "The more transparently and honestly we cooperate with the IAEA the less excuses our critics will have to accuse us of intending to use nuclear technology for military purposes," he added. "This is what we have done so far and hence have had good results." When asked what he thought of the forthcoming IAEA board of governors' meeting due on June 14, Kharazi said: "The Americans will definitely pursue their own aims towards Iran. "My country has voluntarily accepted and implemented the additional protocol (of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, requiring full openness). Naturally our efforts will be effective, winning us more trust." The UN nuclear watchdog is aiming to finish this week a crucial report on Iran's atomic programme, after Tehran handed in an extensive declaration on Friday that it says answers US-led charges it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. WAR.WIRE ***************************************************************** 6 Korea Herald: 'New terms needed in N.K. nuke talks' 2004.05.25 By Choi Soung-ah Rewording CVID likely to be hot issue at 6-way negotiations CVID is a common word these days in political circles on the Korean Peninsula, but Seoul wants to change it. It is the complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement of North Korea's nuclear programs, and Washington is demanding these terms as the ultimate goal in the 19-month standoff with the communist country. Following the first round of six-party working level talks in Beijing, officials here have been wrangling over reworking the term to find the "right" set of words for North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program. South Korea and the United States reportedly gathered ideas and opinions on whether CVID should continue to be used during the talks. A high-ranking South Korean government official said yesterday, "There is no need to continue persisting on the wording itself of the CVID. "During the first working level-talks that opened from May 12-14 in Beijing, we proposed this standpoint to the United States," he said. He added that Joseph DeTrani, the top U.S. representative to the talks, said the issue could be handled "with flexibility," showing signs of agreeing to the idea. During the May 12-14 meetings, Pyongyang said it would not be able to continue discussing possible solutions to a nuclear standoff unless the United States dropped its demands for a complete dismantling of the North's nuclear arms programs. North Korean delegate Pak Myong-kuk reportedly said Pyongyang was prepared to discuss the scope, timing and length of a freeze of its nuclear activities and methods of verifying it. "But the United States repeated its position that it would be willing to discuss the problem only under the precondition that we pledge to a C-V-I-D," Reuters quoted Pak as saying. "We expressed the position that we would not be able to continue discussing a freeze for compensation." While all parties, including North Korea, agree to seek a nuclear weapons-free Korean Peninsula, it is not clear that they all agree on the definition of its components, and Washington has not been specific as to what CVID fully entails. South Korea's efforts with the United States for a change in the words are seen as a shift in attitude by the two key parties on the sticky issue of allowing North Korea peaceful nuclear activity. But many in the U.S. State Department are re-examining the wording of CVID and their views will be reflected in the second working-level talks or the third six-party talks, whichever come first. "There is no change in the essential principle of North Korea's nuclear abandonment," said the official. "There are parts that need to be discussed with the United States but North Korea is expressing complaints that CVID is a crushing policy and that these words are not what they want to continue discussions." On the other hand, Washington has said its position remains unchanged as it goes into these working-level talks and seeks CVID of North Korea's suspected nuclear programs. James Kelly, U.S. assistant secretary of state, who heads the U.S. delegation at the sessions, is reported to have told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee recently that the "acronym and the important goal it represents have been accepted by all but the North Koreans." (bluelle@heraldm.com) ***************************************************************** 7 ITAR-TASS: Russia calls for giving security guarantees to Pyongyang [http://corp.itar-tass.com/eng/] | [ITAR-TASS News Agency of Russia] 24.05.2004, 12.59 MOSCOW, May 24 (Itar-Tass) -- Russia calls for giving “security guarantees and economic assistance to North Korea with the aim of improving the situation in the Korean Peninsula,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko has said. The Korean settlement will be central to the negotiations Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his visiting South Korean counterpart Ban Ki-moon will hold on Monday evening. The Korean foreign minister arrived in Moscow on a visit on Sunday. Yakovenko said “giving proper security guarantees and extending economic and humanitarian assistance to North Korea would contribute decisively to ensuring stability in the peninsula and the security of countries situated there. Russia wants to see better relations between the North and the South and it takes into account the special role of the inter-Korean dialogue.” Moscow attaches economic and political importance to trilateral business partnership of Russia, South Korea and North Korea, Yakovenko said. “First and foremost this refers to the plan for linking the Trans-Korean Railway with the Trans-Siberian line in Russia and to joint energy projects. Russia’s involvement in tackling the problems of the peninsula stems from economic expediency and the task of keeping Korea within the sphere of nuclear non-proliferation and settling the nuclear problem. “Ban Ki-moon’s visit to Moscow is taking place against a backdrop of active Russian-South Korean exchanges and contacts,” Yakovenko said. “Bilateral trade last year was up to 4.2 billion dollars, and the accrued South Korean investments in Russia, 202 million dollars. The noticeable improvement of the investment climate in Russia will expand the scale of economic ties with Seoul,” the Russian foreign ministry spokesman said. © ITAR-TASS. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 8 Guardian Unlimited: North Korean nuclear trade exposed IAEA team finds Pyonyang sold uranium to Libya for bomb Ian Traynor Monday May 24, 2004 The Guardian [http://www.guardian.co.uk] North Korea supplied uranium for Libya's secret nuclear bomb programme, UN investigators have established, raising alarm about the heightened risk of so-called rogue states or terrorist groups buying nuclear materials. Western diplomats in Vienna close to the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed yesterday that the IAEA investigation into the Pakistan-led black market in nuclear materials and technology had found that 1.7 tonnes of slightly enriched uranium hexafluoride uncovered in Libya when Colonel Muammar Gadafy voluntarily scrapped his nuclear project last December was sent from North Korea. It was initially suspected that the material had been obtained via private traders. "There was a direct North Korea-Libya connection through the Khan network," said a diplomat close to the agency, referring to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani scientist who led the secret nuclear trading network. "This is the first time that there is evidence that North Korea has sold nuclear materials to another country." The discovery, reported yesterday by the New York Times and confirmed by diplomats in Vienna, was made recently, the source added. It indicates that North Korea is the first state known to be involved in the illicit nuclear trade. Officials at the agency declined to comment publicly on the North Korea case, although they did not deny that the Libyan uranium was of North Korean provenance. The discovery by IAEA investigators does not reflect well on British or US intelligence, who spent nine months last year negotiating secretly with the Libyans to get Col Gadafy to scrap his weapons of mass destruction programmes. The bargain was sealed with a dramatic announcement. Col Gadafy lost his pariah status in return for surrendering his programmes and information. The Americans spirited the nuts and bolts of the Libyan nuclear project out of Libya to the US, including the uranium in question, enrichment centrifuge equipment bought on the black market to refine the uranium to weapons grade, and a nuclear bomb blueprint. But the news of the North Korean involvement has come not from the US or Britain but from the IAEA's investigation, led by Finnish inspector Olli Heinonen, of the Khan network. A western diplomat with extensive knowledge of North Korea and its secret weapons programmes said that he was not surprised by the news since Col Gadafy was a principal supplier of hard currency to the impoverished Pyongyang regime, mainly through engineering and medical contracts. He stressed that North Korea had done nothing illegal in supplying minimally enriched uranium to Libya. Pyongyang kicked UN nuclear inspectors out of the country, cut relations with the IAEA, abrogated its pledges under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and said it was building a bomb at the end of 2002. The main row over the North Korean bomb project concerns weapons-grade plutonium retrieved from spent nuclear fuel rods in power stations. But the supplies to Libya appear to confirm US charges that the North Koreans also have a uranium mining and enrichment project that could deliver bomb-grade material. "The North Koreans are obviously mining, refining uranium and selling it to others," said the diplomatic source close to the IAEA. "This is worrying since they have the capability for enriching uranium." Given that Pyongyang supplied Libya, investigators are worried that it may also have supplied other clients, possibly including terrorist groups, and that it could also have sold on a more lethal form of uranium. The exposure of the Khan network threw up evidence of cooperation between Pakistan and North Korea in the nuclear sphere. The expert on North Korea also believes that Pyongyang has been involved in Iran, the prime international suspect in the illicit nuclear wargames rackets. The Iranians at the weekend handed over to the IAEA what they said was a full dossier on their nuclear projects ahead of an IAEA meeting in three weeks which had been due to focus on the Iranian programme, but will also now be preoccupied with the North Korean trading. Timelines 12.02.2003: North Korea's nuclear programme North Korea - 1991 to the present Graphic Map of North and South Korea [http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/graphic/0,5812,331538,00.html [UP] Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004 ***************************************************************** 9 asahi.com: EDITORIAL: The Pyongyang summit [asahi.com] Japan must go on the diplomatic offensive. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited Pyongyang on Saturday for the first time in 20 months and met North Korean leader Kim Jong Il. Their talks yielded the return of the two children of Kaoru and Yukiko Hasuike, and the three of Yasushi and Fukie Chimura. They arrived in Tokyo that evening. But for returned abductee Hitomi Soga, her American husband and two daughters declined to come to Japan. An arranged reunion of that family in a ``third country'' appears to be in the cards. We are relieved that the separation and pain of the Hasuike and Chimura families have ended. We wish them the best in putting their lives back together with a new start in Japan. Unfortunately, however, that about sums up the visible fruits of Saturday's summit. The Japanese government has previously demanded investigations into the fate of 10 other Japanese also believed abducted by North Korean agents in the 1970s and early 1980s. Pyongyang has insisted that those individuals are either dead or not on record as having entered North Korea. Kim Jong Il pledged to reopen that inquiry. Koizumi attempted to put a positive spin on this promise, saying that it does not amount to a ``delay'' or a ``shelving'' of the issue. But for the families of those victims, the summary assurance that an investigation will be made-with no deadline-must certainly be vexing. Koizumi promised 250,000 tons of food and other humanitarian assistance to the North, while specifying that this is not ``payment'' for the handover of the family members. He also assured Kim that Tokyo will not impose economic sanctions as long as the contents of the Pyongyang Declaration signed by the two leaders in September 2002 are upheld. The North Korean media put its typical twist on the talks, reporting as if Koizumi was visiting to promise food aid. The prime minister also pressed Kim to abandon his nuclear development program, but the North Korean strongman refused to back down from his hard-line stance. Despite this minimal progress, Koizumi indicated he was willing to consider steps to normalize diplomatic relations between Tokyo and Pyongyang-a matter of high priority for the North. This prompted criticism from some quarters about the lack of meaningful progress on the fate of the other 10 Japanese. Some said that Koizumi, in his rush to bring to Japan the family members of the repatriated victims, largely skimmed over the other pending problems. Yet, without this top-level visit to Pyongyang, it is unlikely that the Hasuike and Chimura children would have been allowed to rejoin their parents in Japan. Taking a strong stance on the remaining 10 victims was another natural course of action. Brandishing the ``carrot'' of normalized relations is also a potentially potent means of expediting more information on that matter. During Saturday's exchange, Kim agreed to ``faithfully fulfill'' the principles of the Pyongyang Declaration. On the nuclear issue, he declared that efforts would be made to reach a peaceful resolution through the six-nation talks that also include the United States, China, South Korea and Russia. Based on Kim's past record, it is tough to take these promises at face value. Nuclear development is a case in point. Not long after the signing of the joint declaration, which pledges to observe international agreements on nuclear matters, Pyongyang expelled International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors and declared it was no longer a party to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons. These actions are flagrant violations of the declaration. Taking this situation to heart, the only chance for a viable breakthrough on this front lies in putting the problem on the table at the Tokyo-Pyongyang normalization negotiations and the six-way talks. Saturday's summit should be viewed as valuable for reconfirming this fact. Strong demands must also be made for information on the progress of the reinvestigation pledged by Kim of the other 10 alleged abduction victims. This stand should be voiced at every possible occasion, including any normalization talks. The summit also reaffirmed that Kim has frozen his nation's missile launch testing program. Here, though, the problem is not only testing. Japan lies within geographical striking range of Nodong ballistic missiles deployed by the North. Pyongyang's nuclear development and missiles are also a menace to Northeast Asia. The country's missile program should be another item on the agenda for normalization. Washington, Beijing and Seoul have given Koizumi's visit high marks for helping to ease tension over the nuclear standoff. To transform this positive step into genuine progress, Tokyo should step up its diplomatic offensive toward the North. --The Asahi Shimbun, May 23(IHT/Asahi: May 24,2004) (05/24) [Copyright Asahi Shimbun. All rights reserved. No reproduction or republication without written permission ] ***************************************************************** 10 asahi.com: ANALYSIS: Kim secures the biggest gain by giving the smallest concession [asahi.com] By KIYOSHI HASABA:The Asahi Shimbun PYONGYANG-North Korean leader Kim Jong Il-not Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi-seemed to gain the most from last Saturday's summit. The direct meeting was a gamble not only for Koizumi, but also for Kim in determining North Korea's future diplomatic strategy. The outcome turned out favorable for Kim, who won major concessions from Koizumi, who promised humanitarian aid and no economic sanctions against Pyongyang if it sticks to the 2002 Pyongyang Declaration. Pyongyang won 250,000 tons of rice plus $10 million (about 1.1 billion yen) worth of medical assistance from Japan. But what Pyongyang yielded in return was to let five kin go to Japan and rejoin their parents, who were abducted in the late 1970s and kept in North Korea for nearly a quarter century. North Korea might have been willing to allow the relatives' departure ever since Kim admitted the abductions and apologized to Koizumi during their 2002 meet. So, it can be said that Pyongyang did not really make a significant concession at all. Pyongyang also had more to gain than lose on the nuclear issue-using Koizumi to send a message to the United States. Koizumi reminded Kim of Washington's demand that Pyongyang totally abandon its nuclear programs in a ``verifiable and irreversible manner.'' Kim mentioned his willingness to freeze his country's nuclear programs in exchange for energy assistance. He also emphasized that improving Japan and North Korea's bilateral relationship depends on ``the attitude of Japan's ally''-implicitly conveying the message that the United States holds the key to solving the issue. Considering Washington's stance of dialogue without negotiation with Pyongyang, Kim may have found a conduit in Koizumi for breaking the nuclear standoff with the United States, Japan and South Korea. But Saturday's meeting may not be as good as gold for Kim. It can be said that, aside from Japan's humanitarian aid, the agreement made at the summit has brought Kim back to the Pyongyang Declaration of 20 months ago. It is still unclear how the issue of re-opening investigations of another 10 Japanese nationals, who Pyongyang says are dead or never entered the country, will develop. Japanese opinion could take a turn for the worse as the probe that Kim promised proceeds. This could hamper normalization between the two nations, which Pyongyang urgently needs in order to win large-scale economic aid from Japan. Pyongyang says it will only talk with the United States on the nuclear issue. But North Korea will certainly use the tie that Kim strengthened with Koizumi through the summit talks as leverage in negotiating with the United States. North Korean media, meanwhile, swiftly reported the Koizumi-Kim meeting, but did not mention anything about the abduction or nuclear issues. The reports emphasized that Koizumi pledged to resume humanitarian aid immediately ``for restoring confidence'' between the two nations, and that the two leaders reaffirmed each other on the significance of the Pyongyang Declaration.(IHT/Asahi: May 24,2004) (05/24) [Copyright Asahi Shimbun. All rights reserved. No reproduction ***************************************************************** 11 AFP: UN nuclear watchdog investigating possible NKorea nuclear shipment to Libya [http://www.spacewar.com/] VIENNA (AFP) May 23, 2004 The UN atomic agency is investigating evidence that North Korea secretly provided Libya with nearly two tonnes of uranium in early 2001, a senior diplomat close to the agency told AFP Sunday. He was reacting to a report in The New York Times that a giant cask of uranium hexafluoride (U6), which can be enriched to weapons-grade levels, came to Libya from North Korea. Citing unnamed US officials and European diplomats familiar with the intelligence, the Times said that if confirmed, the transaction would be the first known case in which the North Korean government has sold a key ingredient for manufacturing atomic weapons to another country. The diplomat, who asked not to be named, said the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was in the middle of its investigation of this connection but "had not found explicitly the source" of the shipment. The IAEA is "investigating where this U6 came from," said the diplomat, who asked not to be named. He said the report of evidence about North Korea as a source was "not off. The IAEA just does not know for sure yet." The Times said the IAEA was basing its conclusion on interviews of members of the secret nuclear supplier network set up by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the former head of Pakistan's main nuclear laboratory. The diplomat said there were "many other people talking on top of" the IAEA to members of the Khan network, and that the investigation was at a delicate stage. WAR.WIRE ***************************************************************** 12 LAT: Case Reveals Nuts and Bolts of Nuclear Network, Officials Say [Los Angeles Times - latimes.com] May 24, 2004 By Josh Meyer, Times Staff Writer ROCKVILLE, Md.  As they race to dismantle a global black market in nuclear weapons components, U.S. authorities are focusing on an unusual case: an Orthodox Jew from Israel accused of trying to sell nuclear weapons parts to a business associate in Islamic Pakistan. Asher Karni, 50, currently a resident of South Africa, was arrested at Denver's international airport as he arrived with his wife and daughter for a New Year's ski vacation. Friends and family have been pressing for his release, describing him as a hard-working electronics salesman just trying to earn a living. However, federal authorities contend that Karni is something more: a veteran player in an underground network of traffickers in parts, technology and know-how for the clandestine nuclear weapons programs of foreign governments. The Karni case offers a rare glimpse into what authorities say is an international bazaar teeming with entrepreneurs, transporters, scientists, manufacturers, government agents, organized-crime syndicates and, perhaps, terrorists. Authorities say the case also provides a classic illustration of how illicit nuclear traffickers operate  readily skirting export bans, disguising the real use for products, using middlemen to buy from legitimate manufacturers and routing shipments through several countries. Such traffickers have flourished amid little effective response by the United States, its allies or the U.N. watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, despite repeated warnings, authorities say. "There are Iranian networks, Chinese networks, Middle East networks, sophisticated networks buying technology and parts all over the world," said a senior official at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, who cited sensitive investigations in demanding anonymity. "They're operating in the United States every day. Some of them are family businesses, where fathers pass it on to their sons." One such network came to light several months ago when top Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan admitted selling nuclear weapons programs to Iran, Libya and North Korea for tens of millions of dollars. Authorities have kept Karni in custody since his arrest, arguing that he is a flight risk and a threat to national security. He has been charged with violating the federal Export Control Act and other laws aimed at curbing nuclear proliferation. Ensconced in the county jail in a Washington suburb, he faces a maximum sentence of 10 years. Karni is accused of orchestrating a deal to send as many as 200 electrical components that can be used for medical or nuclear weapons purposes to a Pakistani businessman named Humayun Khan. Karni and Humayun Khan have denied knowingly breaking any U.S. laws, and both say they have no ties to Abdul Qadeer Khan or his network. Some U.S. officials believe the ultimate destination of the electrical components would have been the Pakistani government, which is also suspected of complicity in Abdul Qadeer Khan's network. Federal agents plan to go to Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, as part of their probe. The components, called triggered spark gaps, are sophisticated electrical switches that have nonmilitary uses, including breaking up kidney stones. But because they emit intense and rapid-fire electrical charges, they are also ideal as nuclear detonators, prompting the U.S. government to restrict their export. In court documents filed in Karni's case in Washington, authorities say Humayun Khan, in Islamabad, placed an order with Karni for 200 of the switches last summer, at $447 apiece, and that Khan has links to Pakistan's military and a militant Islamic political group. "The charges are extraordinarily serious. The allegations couldn't be more grave," said Rep. Christopher Cox (R-Newport Beach), chairman of the House Select Committee on Homeland Security. "This is another piece in the global puzzle of suppliers and buyers, middlemen and [front companies] all over the planet," said Cox, who said he was not commenting on Karni's innocence or guilt. "The problem was hardly created on Sept. 11. But the stark reality of it and the unspeakable consequences of it have now gripped policymakers." Pakistani officials insisted in interviews with The Times that the government was not involved in any effort to buy U.S. products prohibited for export to their country, a ban prompted in part by Pakistan's nuclear weapons program. 1975 Deal With Ex-Nazi But The Times has confirmed that Humayun Khan's family import-export business, Pakland Corp., was a purchasing agent for that nuclear program as far back as 1975. At the time, Pakland was negotiating at least one deal for suspected nuclear weapons material with Alfred Hempel, a German industrialist, former Nazi and central figure in the then already-burgeoning global nuclear bazaar. Hempel, who died in 1989, did as much to spread nuclear weapons in his day as did Abdul Qadeer Khan, perhaps more, said Gary Milhollin, founder of the Washington-based Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. During the 1970s and '80s, Hempel used cargo planes, bribes and a secret network of operatives to supply countries in South Asia, Africa, South America and the Middle East with nuclear weapons materials. Like Abdul Qadeer Khan, he made millions and, despite years of scrutiny by nuclear proliferation watchdogs, escaped any serious consequences. The Homeland Security Department official said investigators planned to aggressively pursue any connections between the Karni case and what may remain of Hempel's network. Humayun Khan, the official said, appears to have been involved in illegal deals going back at least several years. Channing Phillips, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, said he could not comment because the investigation was in its preliminary stages. "There are still a lot of unanswered questions," he said. "We're trying to follow the trail, if you will." Karni and his lawyers have declined to comment on the case. But authorities say he has already provided them with a rare window into the nuclear underworld, without even knowing it. Over the years, Karni has built up a global list of intermediaries and clients as a salesman of sophisticated military and aviation electronics equipment, most recently through his company, Top-Cape Technology in Cape Town, South Africa. In a stroke of good fortune, federal agents were able to get an inside view of one of those business deals. Authorities launched their investigation in July, after an anonymous South African tipster said Karni had been using front companies, straw buyers and misleading shipping documents to sell restricted U.S. products to Pakistan and India. The tipster said Karni was in the process of buying as many as 400 of the switches for Humayun Khan. Updates From Tipster Agents with the U.S. departments of Commerce and Homeland Security monitored the deal with updates from the tipster, including Karni's e-mail correspondence and shipping information for the switches. Karni first tried to buy the switches directly from Perkin- Elmer Optoelectronics of Salem, Mass., according to an affidavit filed by Special Agent James R. Brigham of the Commerce Department's Office of Export Enforcement. The affidavit and other court documents lay out the alleged criminal conspiracy to evade U.S. export control laws, including e-mails between Karni and Khan. A PerkinElmer official told Karni he needed to submit required U.S. certificates detailing what the switches would be used for, and promising not to send them to blacklisted countries such as Pakistan or use them in nuclear-related applications. Karni told Khan he wouldn't submit such paperwork. "Dear Asher, I know it is difficult but thats [sic] why we came to know each other," Khan replied. "Please help to re-negotiate this from any other source, we can give you an end user information as it is genuinely medical requirement." Karni then contacted Zeki Bilmen, head of Giza Technologies of Secaucus, N.J. On Aug. 6, Giza ordered 200 of the switches from PerkinElmer for $89,400, submitting certificates saying they would be used in a Soweto, South Africa, hospital. Authorities contacted Per- kin-Elmer officials, who told them a typical hospital order was for five or six switches. In response, the U.S. agents asked them to discreetly disable the first batch of 66 switches and send them on. The original tipster told authorities that Karni might list a lithography company at Khan's address as the end user, not Khan's firm, Pakland PME, and later provided Federal Express tracking numbers showing a circuitous route through Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates. Traffickers frequently ship restricted U.S. items to Dubai, Malta and other unrestricted trade zones worldwide and then re-export them to third countries to hide the origin or destination and avoid laws aimed at curbing nuclear proliferation, authorities say. Karni did just as the tipster predicted, and agents tracked the package at every step. Giza, which had certified to PerkinElmer that the switches were for hospital use, sent them to Karni's Cape Town office by declaring them "electrical splices and couplings for switchings," which don't require an export license, Brigham's affidavit says. Providing such false or misleading information is a violation of federal law, he noted. Karni then labeled them electrical parts and sent them to Dubai and on to Islamabad, where, in late October, someone identifying himself as an employee of the AJKMC Lithography Aid Society signed for the spark gaps. Authorities suspect the letters stand for All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference, a political party that controls the Pakistani-ruled part of the disputed Kashmir region and allegedly has terrorist affiliations. On Dec. 11, South African police raided Karni's offices at U.S. authorities' request. Karni admitted sending the spark gaps, court papers say. Less than a month later, in one of the many mysteries of the case, he came to the U.S., where he was arrested. Bilmen, of Giza Technologies, has not been charged. His lawyer, Robert C. Herbst, said Giza employees "were a victim of Asher Karni as much as anyone else was." In court records, authorities said Karni often sent air freight to Pakistan and that he either completed or discussed other suspicious deals. In one, Karni bought for Khan a type of sophisticated oscilloscope often used in nuclear weapons and military programs, also through Giza. In another, he exchanged e-mail with a man identified as an Indian contact trying to buy several kinds of high-tech material for two Indian rocket factories. Soon after his arrest, Karni and his case were transferred to Washington. He was eventually moved from federal custody to the county jail. "This case represents one of the most serious types of export violations imaginable," one prosecutor argued in a court filing. "Karni has exported goods that are capable of detonating nuclear weapons to a person he knows has ties to the Pakistani military. "Although Pakistan's current leadership has vowed to curb the spread of this technology, that region of the world remains volatile, and Islamic militants in the area have made no secret of their desire to obtain nuclear weapons," the filing says. "The threat that Karni's conduct posed was real." Karni insists that he didn't know the spark gaps could be used as detonators in nuclear weapons, according to Rabbi Herzel Kranz of the Hebrew Sheltering Home in Silver Spring, Md., who says he keeps in frequent contact with Karni. A federal judge has approved bail for Karni if he were to stay at the home and wear an electronic monitoring bracelet, but authorities have kept him in custody on alleged immigration violations. In an interview, Kranz said a friend told him about Karni's "distressed situation." He said he went to his aid believing he was innocent, perhaps an unwitting victim of some kind of conspiracy. "Why would a religious Jew send nuclear weapons parts to a country that hates Israel as much as Pakistan?" Kranz asked. "He has no idea what he's gotten himself into. But he's really grabbed a tiger by the tail here." Kranz said everything about Karni seemed to contradict the profile of a black-market trafficker: Karni was born in Hungary but grew up in Israel, where he was orphaned at a young age, Kranz said. He displayed prowess in the Talmud, or Hebrew scholarship. He spent 15 years in the Israeli army, becoming a major while obtaining a bachelor's degree in chemistry and an MBA. Karni moved his young family to South Africa in behalf of an Orthodox Jewish organization and decided to stay. Destination of Material Privately, senior U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the case said a critical question is where the spark gaps were headed, particularly because Humayun Khan  Karni's alleged collaborator  apparently is a supplier to the Pakistani military. In e-mail exchanges, Humayun Khan had no comment on a February 1975 letter obtained by The Times, in which a man named M. Akram Khan of Pakland Corp. in Karachi tells Switzerland-based firm Adero Chemie that it must act quickly to beat out a competing Australian firm for a large shipment of material used to run nuclear reactors that make plutonium. But he confirmed that M. Akram Khan was his late father and that he spent 11 years working with him at the family business, Pakland Corp., before starting Pakland PME in 1994. Khan didn't respond to questions about his father's apparent role as a purchasing agent for the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission or whether he took over any of those business relationships upon his father's death. But he insisted that he had done nothing wrong, and said someone else used his e-mail address to send incriminating e-mails to Karni. He added, "The obvious is not what it seems." Milhollin, who provided the letter to The Times, first exposed Hempel's activities more than 15 years ago, sounding repeated alarms before congressional committees. Milhollin, whose organization maintains a database that tracks suspected nuclear proliferators, which is used by dozens of governments, warned in 1989 that U.S. officials needed to stop the nuclear black market before it was too late. "Otherwise, the strategic map of the world is being redrawn without anyone really understanding the consequences," Milhollin wrote. "That these sales are still happening  after a decade of U.S. efforts to stop them  shows how U.S. diplomacy has failed." Fifteen years later, it appears little has changed. A senior Energy Department official said the latest intelligence showed that nuclear black market activity had continued to flourish. "Demand hasn't diminished. In fact, it's increased," the official said. "Where there's demand, there are people willing and able to supply it." Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times By visiting this site, you are ***************************************************************** 13 AP Wire: Energy Department helps pay for Alabama nuclear reactor study | 05/24/2004 | JEFFREY McMURRAY Associated Press WASHINGTON - The Department of Energy announced Monday it would help pay to study the cost of constructing a two-unit nuclear power plant at an Alabama site that has been vacant for 20 years. Deputy Secretary Kyle McSlarrow made the announcement during a tour of the Browns Ferry station in Athens, Ala., and the Bellefonte site in Scottsboro, which is the proposed location for the two-unit Advanced Boiling Water Reactor as early as 2014. Although there was no firm commitment, only $4.25 million for the study - half funded by the federal government - McSlarrow said the news was significant. "Even though it's not in dollar terms perhaps a large amount, this is in concrete, for the future of nuclear power, a huge deal and a huge step forward," he said. For the past year, the Tennessee Valley Authority has explored whether Bellefonte could be used for the next generation boiling water reactor, which are currently running in Japan and Taiwan. A group that includes TVA, nuclear vendors General Electric and Toshiba, engineers Bechtel Corp., and fuel producers U.S. Enrichment Corp., will pay for the other half of the study. TVA Chairman Glenn McCullough told McSlarrow the 1,500-acre Bellefonte site was ideal because it had been designed for two reactors and was located on the Tennessee River. The community has also been supportive, he said. "Alabama is a very pro-nuclear state," McCullough said. It will take eight months to a year to complete the study on cost and schedule of the project. If all goes well, TVA could apply for a construction and operating license application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said he was encouraged by the news that the federal government had agreed to be a partner in studying the reactor. "If the numbers come out like we hope, there will be a powerful case for bringing this facility online as a modern nuclear power plant," Sessions said. ON THE NET Department of Energy: [http://www.energy.gov] Tennessee Valley Authority: [http://www.tva.gov/] ***************************************************************** 14 [progchat_action] Nuclear marketplace Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:55:51 -0500 (CDT) The case of an Israeli orthodox Jew selling nuclear weapons parts to a Pakistani Islamic fundamentalist illustrates the extensive underground trade in the components, todays Los Angeles Times reports. Asher Karni, an Israeli citizen now resident in South Africa, was arrested on a recent visit to the US and charged with violating federal laws against nuclear proliferation. The Karni case offers a rare glimpse into what authorities say is an international bazaar teeming with entrepreneurs, transporters, scientists, manufacturers, government agents, organized-crime syndicates and, perhaps, terrorists, writes reporter Josh Meyer. The trade is flourishing despite decades-long efforts by the US and its allies and the UNs International Agency for Arms Control to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The parts shipped by Karni to his Pakistani collaborator, who is allegedly linked to an Islamic militant group, were believed intended for use in Pakistans nuclear weapons program. Another report in todays Washington Post corroborates the ease with which nuclear weapons can be assembled from materials available on the open market for potential use against civilian populations. Both articles available on: http://www.supportingfacts.com or URLs: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-nukes24may24,1,7259909.s tory?coll=la-headlines-world http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50362-2004May23.html?referrer =email Sorry for any cross posting. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/XgSolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/progchat_action/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: progchat_action-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 15 Haaretz: Vanunu shows up in court for libel suit against Yedioth daily Homepage [http://www.haaretz.com] News Updates Tue., May 25, 2004 Sivan 5, 5764 Israel By Zvi Harel [zvih@haaretz.co.il] In his first public appearance since being freed last month from an 18-year prison sentence, Mordechai Vanunu yesterday attended a hearing at Tel Aviv Magistrate Court, which is sitting on the nuclear whistleblower's libel case against Yedioth Ahronoth daily and journalist Ron Ben Yishai. Vanunu's suit for NIS 368,000 was filed in September 2002 following an extensive article which charged that during his time in prison he had passed information to Hamas on how to manufacture explosive devices. Vanunu's attorney, Avigdor Feldman, at the time said the report had been fabricated. The article was never verified and Yedioth Ahronoth did not even ask Vanunu for a response. Vanunu did not testify yesterday, and will take the witness stand at a later date. In his statement to the court yesterday, Ben Yishai said the initial information he received on the story came from Ami Ayalon, former head of the Shin Bet security service who discussed it in a meeting with a group of 10 journalists at the end of 1999. Ben Yishai said, he had decided to publish the article five months later, only after verifying the information with another source and because there was public interest at the time, since Vanunu had submitted a request for early release. Ben Yishai noted that he had not revealed Ayalon's name. He also said that he had not asked the other source to testify in order not to divulge journalistic sources. Ayalon is expected to testify at the next hearing. [feedback@haaretz.co.il] © Copyright Haaretz. All rights reserved ***************************************************************** 16 Guardian Unlimited: Israeli Nuclear Spy Appears in Court From the Associated Press [UP] Monday May 24, 2004 11:46 AM By PETER ENAV Associated Press Writer TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) - Mordechai Vanunu, who served 18 years in prison for revealing Israel's nuclear secrets, appeared in court in a libel suit Monday, his first public appearance since being released last month. Vanunu has been secluded at a Jerusalem church since is April 21 release. Wearing a blue Oxford shirt and a cross around his neck, Vanunu did not testify, and the case was continued. Asked by reporters how he was doing, Vanunu signaled with a nod that he was OK. He was whisked out of the courtroom by security guards without speaking to reporters. Vanunu has filed a libel suit against the Yediot Ahronot daily. The newspaper reported in November 1999 that Vanunu had passed information on how to prepare explosives to Hamas militants in prison. Yediot's lawyer, Mibi Moser, said Vanunu was seeking about $78,000 in damages. During a procedural stage, Vanunu's lawyer, Avigdor Feldman told the judge that Vanunu lives in Jerusalem. The judge turned to Vanunu and asked him where in the city he lives. ``In the church, St. George,'' Vanunu replied. Vanunu, a convert to Christianity, has stayed at St. George, an Anglican Church near Jerusalem's Old City, since his release from prison. Vanunu served 18 years in prison for providing The Sunday Times of London with information and pictures of Israel's nuclear reactor. Based on the pictures and information provided by Vanunu - who worked as a technician in the reactor - experts assessed at the time that Israel has the sixth-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world. Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004 ***************************************************************** 17 TCJ: Krieger: Berkeley should forsake its nukes 05/24/04 + [CJOnline.com Topeka Capital-Journal Published Monday, May 24, 2004 MinutemanMedia.org We've all heard about the inspections that took place in Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction and programs to make them. As we know, none were found in Iraq. That wouldn't be the case if the inspectors were to come to the University of California at Berkeley. They would find that programs to research, design, develop, improve, test, and maintain nuclear weapons have been going on under the auspices of this university for more than 60 years. They would find that the University of California provides oversight to the nation's two principal nuclear weapons laboratories: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Los Alamos National Laboratory. They would find that today these weapons laboratories are engaged in attempting to make new, more usable nuclear weapons: "bunker-busters" and mini-nukes. For a fee, the University of California has provided a fig leaf of respectability to the research and development of the most horrendous weapons known to humankind. It is ironic that our government cannot tolerate the possibility of Iraqi scientists creating such weapons, but at the University of California (U.C.) such a horrid use of science is called "a service to the nation." Two of the weapons developed at the Los Alamos Laboratory were used on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These were relatively small weapons but caused the deaths of over 200,000 persons, mostly innocent civilians, by incineration, burning, blast and radiation poisoning. There are no guarantees that the nuclear weapons being developed today under U.C. auspices will not be used again. In fact, the odds are that they will be used again, by accident or design. There are three reasons the U.C. should get out of the nuclear weapons business: First, the U.C. is a great university, and no great university should lend its talents to making weapons capable of destroying cities, civilizations and most life on Earth. A university exists to examine the amazing wonders of our world, to collect and categorize knowledge, and to pass important knowledge from the past on to new generations. How can a great university allow itself to be co-opted into helping create weapons of mass destruction? How can the U.C. Board of Regents justify this as "a service to the nation"? Second, there is no moral ground on which nuclear weapons can rest. These are weapons of mass murder. They cannot discriminate between combatants and civilians. They kill indiscriminately. By continuing to develop and improve these weapons, the United States, economically and militarily the strongest country in the world, is signaling to other nations that these weapons would be useful for them as well. Third, the International Court of Justice has stated that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is illegal under international law. It allowed only one possible exception in which the "very survival of a state" was at stake. In such a situation, it said that the law was unclear, but under any circumstance the use of nuclear weapons would not be legal if it failed to discriminate between civilians and combatants or caused unnecessary suffering. There is no evidence that nuclear weapons could be used without violating these precepts. Sir Joseph Rotblat, a Manhattan Project scientist and Nobel Peace Laureate, has written: "If the use of a given type of weapon is illegal under international law, should not research on such weapons also be illegal, and should not scientists also be culpable?" It is time to heed the words of Professor Rotblat and to bring nuclear weapons under control. If the scientists and engineers at the laboratories are unwilling to give up their role in creating and improving nuclear weapons, then at least the U.C. community can send a message to the rest of the country and the world that it is no longer willing to participate in the management of laboratories making weapons of mass murder. The motto of the University of California is "fiat lux," meaning "let there be light." It is unlikely that the light the founders of the university had in mind was the flash "brighter than a thousand suns." They meant the light of knowledge, truth and beauty. The University of California should end its association with the nation's nuclear weapons laboratories when the contract expires in 2005. David Krieger is president of the Santa Barbara-based Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (www.wagingpeace.org) and wrote "Nuclear Weapons and the World Court" and "Choose Hope, Your Role in Waging Peace in the Nuclear Age." ***************************************************************** 18 CS Monitor: Keeping Track of Uranium | csmonitor.com [http://www.csmonitor.com/] from the May 25, 2004 edition Tacked onto the defense authorization bill is an amendment approved by the Senate that prompts this reaction: You mean the US isn't doing this already? It's hard to believe, but, despite September 11, neither the US nor the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a comprehensive database that tracks the world's highly enriched uranium, nor a complete assessment of the security and terrorist threat that this and other fissile material pose. Highly enriched uranium is the easiest material to use to construct an atomic bomb. Particularly vulnerable are the roughly 135 research nuclear reactors - reactors not used for power generation but for materials testing, research, and medicine - still operating with highly enriched uranium in more than 40 countries. At many of these reactors, which sprang up in places like Vietnam and Ghana as part of the cold war export of the nuclear age, security is lax - nothing more than a guard and fence. Most sites don't have enough material for one bomb, but even at sites that do, security needs to be improved. Dozens of US and international databases track pieces of this picture, and various programs have been established to assist in securing the material. In recent years, fissile material has been successfully removed from Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, and Libya. A bipartisan amendment passed by the Senate last week tasks the Department of Energy with compiling a comprehensive view of the problem and prioritizing the most urgent cases, and granting the department the authority to accelerate and coordinate the security and/or removal of such material. The president reportedly backs the amendment, which would fill a gaping hole in nuclear security. The sooner it becomes law, the better. www.csmonitor.com | Copyright © 2004 The Christian Science Monitor. All rights reserved. ***************************************************************** 19 [NukeNet] good information on new nuclear consortia Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:34 -0700 Focus On The Groups Hoping To Build The Next US N-Plant http://www.worldnuclear.org/_news_feature/index.cfm?NN_Flash=0 Three US consortia have taken up the Department of Energy’s (DOE) challenge to present proposals for feasibility studies and licensing initiatives with the goal of starting to build a new nuclear reactor unit in the country. None of the consortia, or any of their members, has actually committed to building a reactor. DOE will pay up to half of the costs of any of the proposals it selects and funding for the effort is included in the department’s fiscal year 2005 appropriation ­ which has not yet been approved by Congress. Additional companies or consortia could enter the field, since the solicitation does not close until December 2004. However, DOE does not have to wait until the solicitation closes to make awards, so the early entries could garner all available funds. Some companies, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and Bechtel Power Corp., are members of more than one consortium. The US Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) is identifying the three consortia as the NuStart-led consortium, the Dominion-Led consortium and the TVA-Led consortium. In this special feature, NucNet US correspondent Thecla Fabian analyses the proposals ­ and looks at the key players... NuStart-Led consortium The expanded NuStart consortium is the latest entrant into the field and has presented the largest request. Marilyn Kray, who is the executive lead on the project and Exelon’s vice-president for project development, told NucNet that Exelon has the lead in the 10-member group. The group proposes a seven-year, 800 million US dollar effort intended to result in a completed combined construction and operating licence (COL) for one of two reactor designs. The two reactors being considered are the General Electric (GE) Economic and Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) and the Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (AP 1000). Ms Kray said they were picked because each is an evolution of a currently operating plant design. Both reactor vendors are members of the consortium. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the certification application for the AP 1000, which was submitted by Westinghouse, a subsidiary of British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL), in March 2002. The schedule calls for a certification decision in December 2005. GE is engaged in pre-application discussions with NRC on certification of the ESBWR. While GE does not yet have an agreed schedule with NRC, it expects that the certification decision will come in mid- to late 2007. Ms Kray said completion of certification for both reactor designs is part of the NuStart proposal, and she noted that certification does not include all of the design work necessary to build a reactor. The design work is being done in three segments. The first is the preliminary design work needed for NRC design certification. The second is the additional design work needed for submission of the COL. The final stage is the detailed engineering design needed to actually build the plant. Once both certifications are complete, NuStart will select a single design to proceed with the COL, said Ms Kray, adding that, although only one COL will be submitted, “at the end of the day, we want both reactor designs to be positioned for deployment”. The consortium has not decided whether to submit an early site permit (ESP), which is not required for COL submission. The consortium also has the option of rolling site information into the COL, Ms Kray said. NuStart has not selected a site yet. One of the consortia’s initial tasks is to identify a list of possible sites and develop site-selection criteria. The schedule calls for selection of a site by September 2005. Once a site and a reactor design have been selected, NuStart will work with the NRC on developing a licensing strategy. NuStart expects to submit its COL application by January 200 8. The NRC review will take about two years. Ms Kray said that a firm decision on the part of one or more of the partners to actually build a reactor could come at any time during the process. The decision would depend on a number of factors, including how the project was progressing, the ultimate cost of building a plant, and external factors such as electricity costs and environmental issues. The 10-member consortium includes eight power companies: Exelon, Entergy, Constellation Energy, Southern Co., EDF International North America, TVA, Duke Power and Florida Power & Light (FPL) ­ which announced on 19th May that it had joined. The two nuclear reactor vendor members are Westinghouse Electric and GE Energy’s nuclear operations. Six of the power companies have formed a limited liability corporation to manage the project ­ NuStart Energy Development LLC. TVA, as a quasi-public corporation, has not joined the limited liability corporation. The six NuStart LLC members will provide USD 7 million over the course of the project, for a total of USD 42 million. TVA will not provide any cash, but it will provide around USD 500 000 worth of support in-kind. Duke joined the consortium after NuStart submitted its original proposal to the DOE on 31st March. The company had been waiting to finish its own licensing renewal on the Catawba and McGuire nuclear plants, said Duke spokesperson Rose Cummings. Also, the company’s new chief nuclear officer, Brew Barron, who took over in January, is a strong proponent of the nuclear option. Cummings pointed out that Duke now is not looking to build another reactor. None of its three nuclear sites would support a new reactor. She said that if Duke builds anything, it would have to be at a greenfield (undeveloped) site, which has not been ruled out. The DOE is being asked to provide half of the USD 800 million cost. The remainder will come from the consortium’s partners. Dominion-Led consortium A four-member consortium led by Dominion has proposed a USD 500 million project to examine the feasibility of building a Canadian-designed ACR (Advanced Candu Reactor) 700 in the US, using the North Anna nuclear power plant as a reference site. The proposal does not commit to submission of a COL, but proposes a six-year programme to develop a “success path” to the COL, said Dominion spokesman Rick Zuercher. Dominion submitted an ESP for the North Anna site to NRC on September 25, 2003. John Polcyn, president of AECL Technologies (Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.’s US subsidiary) told NucNet that the ACR 700 is a light-water reactor (LWR) that combines features of the Canadian CANDU reactors and LWRs currently used in the US. It uses slightly enriched fuel (2.1%), unlike the CANDU, which uses natural uranium fuel. He said AECL will start with a basic ACR 700 design, and modify it to meet licensing conditions in Canada, the US and other markets. AECL estimates that it could build the first 753 MW unit of the ACR 700 in 44 months. After building the fifth unit, construction time would drop to 36 months. Under this consortium, Dominion will lead the team, provide a site, and provide up to USD 61 million in funding. AECL will provide the remainder of the costs through its efforts to obtain NRC certification of the ACR 700. The DOE is being asked to pick up matching funds up to USD 250 million. The other two members of the consortium will provide engineering support. Hitachi America will provide work on the secondary side of the plant, the steam side. Bechtel Power Corp. will provide engineering support and support for the COL preparatory work. At the end of the six-year project, the consortium will be ready to submit the COL application. As with NuStart, Dominion has not committed to build the plant, even if it receives the COL. Mr Zuercher said that Dominion is interested in keeping the option available and will make a construction decision based on the need for baseload power and the comparative advantages of the ACR 700 versu s other power supply options. The Dominion-Led consortium was the first to submit a proposal to the DOE, on 13th March. TVA-Led consortium TVA, a member of the NuStart consortium, also is a member of a smaller consortium that seeks to build an advanced boiling water reactor (ABWR) on the Bellefonte site in northern Alabama. The site has two partially completed TVA reactors. This six-member consortium proposes to use an ABWR from GE (a design certified by the NRC in June 1997), said Elizabeth Stuckle, a spokesperson with the US Enrichment Corporation, USEC ­ one of the members of the consortium. Although never built in the US, a joint venture between GE and Toshiba has built three of the reactors in Japan, which are currently operating. They are building five more in Japan and Taiwan, and have another eight in various planning and design stages. The consortium is proposing a modest USD 4 million, 10-month study to determine the feasibility of the project. The DOE has been asked to pick up USD 2 million as its share of the cost. TVA offers the use of the Bellefonte site, and possibly re-use of some of the idle infrastructure on the site. USEC will provide a fuel supply plan and project management support. GE and Toshiba will provide reactor design work. Bechtel will provide engineering support and Global Nuclear Fuel Americas LLC (a joint venture between GE, Toshiba and Hitachi) will provide fuel fabrication support. Ms Stuckle said that TVA does not have an early site permit for Bellefonte, so it would either have to apply for an ESP, or incorporate the site information into the COL. As with the other two consortia, TVA has not made a firm decision to actually build the plant. NucNet understands that federal funding plans for fiscal year 2005 are expected to be finalised by October. The DOE could therefore decide on one or more of the proposals soon afterwards. _______________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Unsubscribe Here: http://www.energyjustice.net/nukenet/ Change your settings at: http://energyjustice.net/mailman/listinfo/nukenet_energyjustice.net ***************************************************************** 20 UPI: Slovakia to complete nuclear power facility - (United Press International) May 24, 2004 Bratislava, , May. 24 (UPI) -- The Slovak government will press ahead with the completion of its second nuclear power plant regardless of Austrian objections, the government said Monday. Slovakia's Mochovce nuclear power station needs another $1 billion in investment before it can come on line at full capacity, industry analysts say. Austria, which has long objected to the construction of nuclear power plants in nearby former communist countries, wants Slovakia to decommission the power plant. Economy Minister Pavol Rusko said Monday Slovakia would not yield to Austria's demands. He added that bidders looking to take a majority stake in Slovakia's main electricity company Slovenske Elektrarne, which runs the nuclear power plant, would be looked upon favorably if they pledge funds to complete the Mochovce plant. Austria shares borders with Slovakia and the Czech Republic, both of which have nuclear power programs which began in the Soviet era. [UPI Perspectives] ***************************************************************** 21 Daily Yomiuri: G-8 to confirm export ban on nations not signing additional protocol Yomiuri Shimbun Leaders of the Group of Eight major nations scheduled to meet next month for a summit meeting on Sea Island, Ga., will confirm the policy of prohibiting exports of nuclear power generating facilities to countries that have not signed the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional Protocol, giving the international organization authority to conduct surprise inspections, a government source said Monday. The policy to restrict the transfer of nuclear power reactors and spent fuel that could be used to develop nuclear weapons, originally proposed by U.S. President George W. Bush in February, is seen as a means to strengthen the nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The Nuclear Suppliers Group, which comprises 40 countries including Japan, operates under a common guideline that the countries to which they export nuclear power reactors and spent fuel must agree to the IAEA's normal inspections and monitoring, based on the countries' voluntary nuclear reports submitted to the agency. The group has endorsed Bush's proposal that the countries sign the IAEA additional protocol, which allows the IAEA to conduct inspections only two hours after announcing an inspection, aimed at making the inspections more thorough. G-8 countries, which are currently working to state Bush's policy in their joint communique on nuclear nonproliferation, intend to accelerate the supply group's activities, the source said. Japan has insisted that countries should not only sign the Additional Protocol but also ratify it. Copyright 2004 The Yomiuri Shimbun ***************************************************************** 22 Times Leader: Where feathers, fission coexist | 05/24/2004 | In PPL's nuke power plant's shadow is some of best bird-watching in the state, according to a new guide. By JON FOX jfox@leader.net [jfox@leader.net] Looking for a good place to scope out some birds? Just drive toward the cooling towers and the billowing white steam. It might seem counter-intuitive to drive toward a nuclear power plant to take in a little nature, but a new bird-watching guide issued earlier this month by Audubon Pennsylvania lists two areas adjacent to PPL's Susquehanna Steam Electric Station as among the 200 best spots in the state. The Susquehanna Riverlands environmental preserve and it's Council Cup Scenic Overlook are named in the guide. "What happens is when you acquire land for a generation site you also acquire some buffer lands around it," said John Fridman, superintendent environmental preservist at the area. That buffer land just happens to contain a variety of habitats, some of which are under pressure in the state, Fridman said. The preserve contains extensive undeveloped riverside forest, upland forest, open field and wetlands. Across the state, riverside forests are becoming increasingly pressured by development, he said. Sheltered and maintained by the utility, the land is host to migratory flocks moving through the area and local species. "The best time if you want to see the largest variety of birds is late March to late May," Fridman said. September through November, the Council Cup overlook offers some ideal hawk-watching conditions. Bird watchers can check out a variety of hawk and falcon species. "An occasional golden eagle will go through, but that's a rarity," Fridman said. The 2,200 acres about five miles north of Berwick on U.S. Route 11 is open seven days a week, dawn to dusk, and is one of 80 important bird areas designated in the state due to its variety of habitats and diversity of bird populations. "PPL decided to give back the use of it in a managed way, sort of like a good-neighbor program," he said of the land opened in 1980. Fridman estimates 120,000 people visit the site annually for bird watching, school programing, picnicking and hunting. "If you see the cooling towers, you know which way to go," he said. Jon Fox, a Times Leader staff writer, may be reached at 829-7219. On the Web: For more information about either Audubon Pennsylvania or the Riverlands preserve go to http://pa.audubon.org [http://pa.audubon.org] or http://www.pplweb.com/community/enviro_preserves/susq. [http://www.pplweb.com/community/enviro_preserves/susq.] ***************************************************************** 23 Slovak news: Rusko wants to complete two blocs of Mochovce nuclear plant Slovakia's English language newspaper May 24 - 30,2004, Volume 10, Number 20 ECONOMY Minister Pavol Rusko, backed by the decision of his party the New Citizen's Alliance, said that the privatisation of the Slovenské elektrárne power producer must be organised such that it would secure the completion of two blocs of the nuclear plant in Mochovce. According to Rusko, this is in the interest of Slovakia's power self-sufficiency, the Pravda daily wrote. The announcement, however, surprised Rusko's ruling partners, who were not informed of the minister's plan. It also angered Slovakia's neighbour, Austria, which believes the nuclear facility is a dangerous risk. According to the daily SME, Hans Kroberger, head of the Austrian ruling party FPO, labelled the plan "an offence and a provocation of the highest rank". In 2000, the Slovak cabinet decided against completing the two blocs with state money. According to estimates, the cost of the work would come to Sk50 billion (€1.2 billion). Compiled by Martina Pisárová from press reports The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information presented in its Flash News postings. [5/24/2004 10:12:48 AM] Copyright © 1998-2003 The Rock spol. s r.o. All rights ***************************************************************** 24 U.S. Newswire: DOE Announces Study of Advanced New Nuclear Power Plant at TVA Site 5/24/2004 1:10:00 PM To: National Desk, Energy Reporter Contact: Hope Williams of the U.S. Department of Energy, 202-586-5806 WASHINGTON, May 24 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today announced that it will cooperate with an industry team led by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) to conduct a detailed study of the potential construction of a two- unit Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) nuclear plant on Bellefonte site near Hollywood, Ala. This study, which will cost a total of $4.25 million over the next 10 months, will help TVA decide whether to build a new, advanced technology nuclear plant at the site by the middle of the next decade, which could produce more than 2600 megawatts of electric energy. DOE will fund half of the cost associated with the study. "We see this study as an important step in industry's consideration of building new nuclear power plants in this country," Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham stated. "Nuclear power is the only large-scale source of domestically produced electricity that does not produce greenhouse gases. It is, therefore, one of our most important energy sources today and has tremendous potential to support the Nation's energy and environmental goals in the future." "As a leader in the use and deployment of nuclear power, TVA's decision to lead a team to conduct this study is a positive signal regarding the future of nuclear energy," Kyle McSlarrow, Deputy Secretary of Energy during a visit to the Bellefonte site said. Deputy Secretary McSlarrow also visited TVA's Browns Ferry plant during his visit to Alabama, which is the site of a major project to prepare the facility's Unit 1 reactor to begin operations by 2007. When started, the 1200 megawatt Browns Ferry Unit 1 plant will be the first new nuclear plant to come on line in the United States in this century. He was joined by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions in making this announcement. Senator Sessions, one of the Senate's strongest supporters of nuclear power, has been a steadfast proponent of building a new nuclear plant at the Bellefonte site. The Bellefonte project will detail the cost and schedule for building a two-unit Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) plant. This technology is a Generation III nuclear power plant that is based on a design developed by General Electric and was certified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 1997. While no plant using this technology has been built in the United States, three ABWR plants are successfully operating in Japan and three additional units are under construction in Japan and Taiwan. The specific design that will be evaluated for the Bellefonte site will reflect modifications made by the Japanese firm, Toshiba, reflecting that company's successful experience with the technology in Japan. TVA will lead a project team that includes General Electric, Toshiba, Bechtel, Global Nuclear Fuels-America, and the Nation's only uranium enrichment supplier, USEC Inc. Following completion of the study in April 2005, TVA will make a decision whether to file a combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application with the NRC and consider subsequent steps for building a new nuclear plant. The department will provide approximately $2.1 million in matching funds to conduct the cost and schedule study. The project, to be conducted under the department's Nuclear Power 2010 program, was proposed by TVA in response to a program financial assistance solicitation issued on Nov. 20, 2003. The Nuclear Power 2010 program is an important component of the department's strategy to implement the National Energy Policy recommendation to expand the role of nuclear energy in the United States as a major component of our Nation's energy policy. The program seeks to achieve an industry decision in 2005 to proceed with a COL application for at least one new nuclear power plant that can begin commercial operation early in the next decade. Neither TVA nor the other two consortia have made a decision to place an order for a new nuclear plant at this time, but each proposed project will help address the complex issues that must be resolved before a new plant is ordered. [http://www.usnewswire.com/] -0- /© 2004 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/ Printer Friendly Format © 2004 U.S. Newswire A Division of [http://www.medialink.com/] ***************************************************************** 25 Free Lance-Star: Lake Anna doesn't need any more nuclear reactors [fredericksburg.com] Date published: 5/24/2004 In a recent article headlined "Green coalition fights new nukes" [May 5], Mr. Richard Zuercher, a Dominion Virginia Power spokesman, contended that Lake Anna was originally designed for four reactors and that water to cool the two proposed reactors is not a problem. (Units 3 and 4 were scrapped in the early 1980s, and Virginians paid the cost of dismantling early construction.) I doubt Dominion has adequately studied the impact of increased water needs and consumption for an expanding population in central Virginia. Safeguarding our water resources has become a high priority since the 1970s, and we are all aware that what happens upstream can have deleterious effects on downstream ecosystems. Lake Anna drains into the Pamunkey River, which in turn drains into the York River, and into Virginia's jewel, the Chesapeake Bay. Because Dominion's evacuation planning has not remained current with population growth, it is likely that Dominion's estimates of future community water needs have to be assessed. Dominion claims it has no plans to build new reactors, but it has readily accepted $14 million from the Department of Energy--our money, taxpayer money--to apply for the early site permit at North Anna. Dominion announced that it will seek another $250 million from the DOE toward construction and design. Why so many millions if it has no intention of building new reactors ? It would be more appropriate if our energy company and self-proclaimed "good corporate neighbor" insisted that the DOE funds it so readily accepts be directed toward research and development of renewable energies and the implementation of conservation technologies. A new stake in nuclear energy, expensive and fraught with radiation risks and with no solution in sight for appropriate radioactive-waste storage and disposal, seems irresponsible on the part of Dominion. Elena Day Charlottesville Date published: 5/24/2004 Copyright 2004, The Free Lance-Star Publishing Co. of ***************************************************************** 26 [du-list] Chris Busby on Uranium Health Effects Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:03:24 -0700 http://www.chris_busby_08may04.html On May 8th, Sunny Miller interviewed Chris Busby, Ph.D. at the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War conference in Berlin. Dr. Busby is an expert the health risks of low level radiation, including so-called Œdepleted¹ uranium (DU). He gave a presentation on DU at the IPPNW and will be working with Traprock on a US speaking tour. Hear his interview (and find relevant links and photos ) at http://www.chris_busby_08may04.html Chris Busby, (UK) obtained a Ph.D. in Chemical Physics from the University of London. He has developed the "Second Event Theory" which distinguishes between hazards from external and internal ionizing radiation. He is the scientific secretary of the European Committtee on Radiation Risk (www.euradcom.org). In 1994 he helped found the Low Level Radiation Campaign, (www.llrc.org) and is its scientific consultant and is the director of the environmental consultancy Green Audit (www.greenaudit.org). He is also a member of both the UK Ministry of Defense Oversight Committee on Depleted Uranium (www.duob.org.uk) and the UK government Committee Examining Radiation Risks from Internal Emitters (www.cerrie.org). See further comment in "The Trojan Horses of Nuclear War, Testimonials-presentations-Resolutions, World Uranium Weapons Conference 2003." Hear also his presentation (mp3) to the World Uranium Weapons Conference ( conference reader available through http://www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/ and see the audio index of conference presentations at http://www.traprockpeace.org/depleted_uranium_hamburg03.html To include your US city or university in a public speaking tour with Chris Busby on assessing radiation risks, please contact Sunny Miller, 413 773-7427. Also on the site: *Photoalbum of Student workshop at the IPPNW, with an interview with workshop moderator and student organizer Caecilie Buhmann *Scott Ritter¹s critique of the Œdiscovery¹ of a shell that supposedly contains sarin precursors (republished, courtesy of Scott, and available as a printable pdf file) *Genevieve Cora Fraser's article on the sentiment's being expressed in the UN in favor of an Israeli arms embargo *Keith Harmon Snow's shocking disclosure of atrocities with extreme sexual violence (rape and sex slavery) that is being committed in the DRC by troops of various nationalities. The world is turning its blind eye on Africa again, and again.... The website will be on hiatus until about June 7th, while the web editor is away at the 5th Annual National Grassroots organizing conference on Iraq in Bloomington, IN See http://www.endthewar.org Charles Jenks, attorney at law President of the Core Group Traprock Peace Center 103A Keets Road Deerfield, MA 01342 413-773-1633; Fax 413-773-7507 charles@mtdata.com http://traprockpeace.org ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 27 [du-list] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:33 -0700 Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Story by Lisa Richwine REUTERS USA: May 24, 2004 http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/25212/story.htm WASHINGTON - The U.S. military should clean up depleted uranium ammunition scattered across Iraq to prevent future health problems such as cancer and birth defects, a leading anti-nuclear activist said. The Pentagon said it had not found any evidence the material, which is so dense it can pierce steel tanks, causes long-term health consequences. An ongoing study of 1991 Gulf War veterans has shown no ill effects. But Dr. Helen Caldicott, a pediatrician and president of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute, linked depleted uranium to higher rates of cancer and birth defects in Iraq following the Gulf War. Depleted uranium ammunition is being used by U.S. troops in Iraq and could seriously harm civilians living there in the decades to come, said Caldicott, founding president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, an anti-nuclear group that shared the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize. "We should be taking responsibility for what is happening over there," she told reporters at the National Press Club. The Pentagon should test buildings in Iraq for depleted uranium, destroy ones with high levels and bury the material underground, Caldicott said. The U.S. government also should compensate people with cancer related to the material, she said. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of nuclear fuel production. It strengthens ammunition and gives weapons twice the range of ones using other heavy metals. Tanks made with depleted uranium have proven impenetrable by enemy weapons, the Pentagon said. There has been controversy about it since its use during the Gulf War and the Balkans conflict, including some claims that European soldiers may have developed leukemia after being exposed to the material in Kosovo in 1999. "We don't see anything from the science" indicating long-term health problems to people exposed to depleted uranium in the environment, said Dr. Michael Kilpatrick, the Defense Department's deputy director for deployment health support. An ongoing study of 70 Gulf War veterans who were hit by weapons using depleted uranium in "friendly fire" incidents has found no major health problems for the soldiers or their 35 children, Kilpatrick said. Kilpatrick said research on potential long-term impacts is continuing. "We are looking at it scientifically. We are keeping an open mind to it," he said in an interview. ____________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 28 [du-list] Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:30 -0700 Activist Urges Depleted Uranium Clean-Up in Iraq Story by Lisa Richwine REUTERS USA: May 24, 2004 http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/25212/story.htm WASHINGTON - The U.S. military should clean up depleted uranium ammunition scattered across Iraq to prevent future health problems such as cancer and birth defects, a leading anti-nuclear activist said. The Pentagon said it had not found any evidence the material, which is so dense it can pierce steel tanks, causes long-term health consequences. An ongoing study of 1991 Gulf War veterans has shown no ill effects. But Dr. Helen Caldicott, a pediatrician and president of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute, linked depleted uranium to higher rates of cancer and birth defects in Iraq following the Gulf War. Depleted uranium ammunition is being used by U.S. troops in Iraq and could seriously harm civilians living there in the decades to come, said Caldicott, founding president of Physicians for Social Responsibility, an anti-nuclear group that shared the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize. "We should be taking responsibility for what is happening over there," she told reporters at the National Press Club. The Pentagon should test buildings in Iraq for depleted uranium, destroy ones with high levels and bury the material underground, Caldicott said. The U.S. government also should compensate people with cancer related to the material, she said. Depleted uranium is a byproduct of nuclear fuel production. It strengthens ammunition and gives weapons twice the range of ones using other heavy metals. Tanks made with depleted uranium have proven impenetrable by enemy weapons, the Pentagon said. There has been controversy about it since its use during the Gulf War and the Balkans conflict, including some claims that European soldiers may have developed leukemia after being exposed to the material in Kosovo in 1999. "We don't see anything from the science" indicating long-term health problems to people exposed to depleted uranium in the environment, said Dr. Michael Kilpatrick, the Defense Department's deputy director for deployment health support. An ongoing study of 70 Gulf War veterans who were hit by weapons using depleted uranium in "friendly fire" incidents has found no major health problems for the soldiers or their 35 children, Kilpatrick said. Kilpatrick said research on potential long-term impacts is continuing. "We are looking at it scientifically. We are keeping an open mind to it," he said in an interview. -- Posted for educational and research purposes only, ~ in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 ~ NucNews Links and Expanded Archives - http://nucnews.net ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 29 NPR : Getting to the Bottom of Perchlorate Health Consequences of Contaminated Water Unclear in Calif. [audio icon] NPR's Jon Hamilton Reports, Part 1 Sites in California where perchlorate reportedly has been released into the environment, as of April 2003. Credit: Environmental Protection Agency May 25, 2004 -- California is fighting a costly battle against the chemical perchlorate, a component of fuel for rockets and missiles. The state's aerospace and defense companies, as well as the military, have used large amounts of the chemical since World War II. But in recent years, perchlorate has been discovered in California's water supplies. The state has suggested that even tiny amounts are worrisome. So communities have shut down wells, filed lawsuits and started costly clean-up efforts. Remarkably, all of this has taken place without any solid evidence that even the most contaminated water has made anyone sick. NPR's Jon Hamilton [http://www.npr.org/about/people/bios/jhamilton.html] reports in a two-part series. Part 1: The Health Risks If there's any place in California where perchlorate might have been expected to hurt people, it's Rancho Cordova. The city lies just east of Sacramento and right next to one of the nation's worst perchlorate spills. Hamilton reports on attempts to link the contamination to health problems. Part 2: The Cost of Clean-Up Billions of gallons of potential drinking water in California are going unused because of fears about over perchlorate. Studies show that small amounts don't cause any health problems. But California is encouraging cities to shut down wells rather than serve water with more than a trace of the chemical. That's causing problems in a state where water is scarce. Hamilton reports on one city's struggle -- Rialto -- to keep its water pure without sacrificing its future. ***************************************************************** 30 St. Petersburg Times: Decommissioning Awaits Akula Subs - www.sptimesrussia.com #971, Tuesday, May 25, 2004 By Simon Saradzhyan and Oksana Yablokova STAFF WRITERS MOSCOW - Navy chief Vladimir Kuroyedov has ordered the decommissioning of an entire class of strategic nuclear submarines despite proposals to modernize their armament systems after at least two failed missile launches, a senior commander said Monday. "One could say that we have decommissioned an entire series of submarines ... that could have continued to serve [the Navy]," said Admiral Gennady Suchkov, who was recently suspended from his post as the head of the Navy's Northern Fleet, Interfax reported. At issue are the huge Akula class submarines, which Suchkov described as the Navy's "most powerful" vessels. Kuroyedov ordered the decommissioning after the abortive launches of ballistic missiles from Northern Fleet submarines during a strategic war game earlier this year, Suchkov said in a separate interview published in Novaya Gazeta on Monday. The Navy Command was swift to deny the allegations by Suchkov, who has engaged in a mudslinging fight with Kuroyedov after his suspension over the sinking of a decommissioned diesel submarine last August, which killed nine men. Navy spokesman Igor Dygalo said the Akula class "will continue to exist as it has existed, fulfilling the entire range of goals it has been tasked with," Interfax reported. Dygalo went on to accuse Suchkov of divulging state secrets about the armaments of Akula submarines, which have a displacement of some 25,000 metric tons and are armed with 20 intercontinental ballistic missiles. Suchkov told Novaya Gazeta that Kuroyedov issued an order on April 29 to decommission the Akula class after the launch failures in February. The Novomoskovsk submarine failed to launch an RSM-54 missile in the Barents Sea on Feb.17. Then on Feb. 18 a similar missile was destroyed in flight after veering off the planned trajectory shortly after launch from the Karelia submarine. The failures were caused by a faulty navigation system in one case and a glitch in the control system in another, Kommersant reported earlier this year. The Novomoskovsk and the Karelia belong to the Delphin class, however, and are armed with RSM-52 sea-launched ballistic missiles. It was unclear Monday how the abortive launches of RSM-54s from Delphin class submarines could have prompted Kuroyedov to order the decommissioning of a different class of submarines armed with different missiles. Ivan Safranchuk, head of the Moscow office of the Washington-based Center for Defense Information, said Suchkov's attempt to link the decommissioning of Akula submarines with the abortive launches of a different type of missile from Delfin submarines "appears to be illogical." He noted that the Navy has been retiring Akula submarines for some time. [Copyright] copyright The St. Petersburg Times 1993-2004 ***************************************************************** 31 Gallup Independent: RECA Hearing - Part 1 [http://www.gallupindependent.com/] May 19, 2004 Gallup Independent By Kathy Helms Dine´ Bureau WINDOW ROCK, Ariz. - To the uninitiated, the parade of former uranium workers and downwinders who offered testimony to the National Research Council committee on Tuesday appeared to present a pattern. They were either sick, cancer survivors, or had lost an extensive list of family members to radiation-related illnesses. Their stories and impassioned pleadings to the panel to intercede on their behalf in Washington were simple and sincere, some messages delivered while choking back tears. But the federal government is not known for its compassion when it comes to issuing compensation checks for radiation victims. And while most members of the national panel appeared interested in the testimonies offered – at least for the first seven or eight hours – it is too early to tell whether the committee went away with overwhelming evidence they can use. The National Research Council committee has been charged with assessing recent biologoical, epidemiologic, and related scientific evidence associating radiation exposure with cancers or other impacts on human health. Another part of their task is to determine whether the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) should be expanded, and how services for exposed persons can be improved. But if an interim report issued by the committee – and taken to task several times Tuesday by medical professionals – is any indication, it could be an uphill battle for those affected by radiation-related illnesses. Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr., in testimony before the committee, said the Navajo Nation feels that further measures need to be undertaken to address cultural justice for his people. "There are unresolved issues that hinder our Navajo people who are trying to press their compensation claims, that not only result in cultural injustices, but a perpetration of injustice of making it difficult for Navajo miners, widows, and downwinders to qualify under intense federal regulations," he said. The president expounded on several issues he brought up during a Washington, D.C., hearing before the committee earlier this year – issues he believes are most cumbersome and debilitating when it comes to processing compensation claims for the Dine´. Many Navajo uranium miners who suffer from diseases compensable under RECA do not qualify for benefits because their documented radiation exposures and employment histories fall below current RECA thresholds. "RECA's criteria needs to be revisited again because there are miners who have had high exposure to radiation and developed lung disease, but still do not meet the 40 working level months," the president said. They should be provided the same opportunity as millers and transport workers to meet the exposure requirement by proving that they at least worked one year, he said. "The proof of residency issue has been most adverse, perpetrating cultural injustice. Navajo land use permits, grazing permits, marriage licenses, school and hospital documents should be ideal documents to satisfy the requirements," according to President Shirley. However, problems persist. "The Bureau of Indian Affairs has destroyed school records, leaving Navajo claimants disengaged," he said. "If records are destroyed, then neighbors, relatives, school officials, etc. certified testimonies should be acceptable, whether it is to prove their domicile or school attendance." Lucy Todecheenie, a cancer survivor, provided testimony at the end of the day which aptly illustrated the president¹s point. Todecheenie applied for compensation after being diagnosed with breast cancer in 1994. She grew up in Teec Nos Pos, Ariz., where she still resides. As a child she attended a nearby Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) boarding school. Now in her 60s, records of her attendance no longer exists. Her application for compensation is being held up because she is unable to prove residency to the government's satisfaction due to "not having a post office in my community before 1960," she said. "Our mail came through the Shiprock, New Mexico Post Office where letters were stamped 'New Mexico'." "The traders handed letters to us at the store after they picked up the mail in Shiprock. It is hard to prove the residency for those of us that are living in that area. I tried asking other people I had written to if they had any of my letters, and I cannot come up with anything that shows Teec Nos Pos, Ariz. So that¹s what I¹m up against," she said. Navajo land use permits and grazing permits are not acceptable by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) unless the permit holder is filing. "The nuclear family members are completely left out," President Shirley said. "The permit would have to also depict the dates of 1951-58 and July of 1962. ... If the permit does not depict these years, then the permit is not honored." The BIA issues only one grazing or land use permit per family, however, this is not recognized by DOJ. If a nuclear family member files for compensation, that individual would not be eligible beause their name was not on the grazing permit. "The nuclear family shares in on the grazing permit and it is handed down to family members," Shirley said. Many of those now seeking compensation were but children when the family¹s grazing permit was issued. The Department of Justice also refused to recognize traditional Navajo marriages, according to the president. "Navajo marriages are conducted by medicine people and are sanctified through a ceremony. In this case, a piece of paper (marriage license), a product of European civilization has to be produced in order to qualify for compensation," he said. The certification barrier of hospital records is a nightmare. "Historically, hospital records have always been considered official and authentic. However, in this case, one federal bureaucracy certifies the records of another federal entity at the request of another third-party bureaucracy," Shirley said, resulting in unnecessary delays and an abundance of resources without additional funding. The Navajo Nation is requesting that chronic renal failure and renal cancers, including nephritis and kidney tubal tissue injury be included as a compensable disease for miners. "S1515 includes this coverage for millers and transport workers but not for the miners. The millers, transport workers and miners all did the same work, so why is one group of workers left out? It could have been an oversight by Congress similarly as to how Mohave County was left out due to a spelling error," he said. Recent studies in Canada and Finland have shown that people who drink water containing even low amounts of uranium over long periods of time develop irreversible kidney disease, while other studies have shown that uranium is a "potent renal toxicant," according to the president. "Our Navajo people suffer from a high rate of kidney disease and I am requesting to have the federal government provide funding for medical studies to be conducted in Navajoland." The president also is seeking a comprehensive medical study for dependents of uranium workers, as well as an environmental and public health impact assessment and study. Intensive mining operations over the past five decades have left large deposits of uranium and toxic wastes in many Navajo communities. Those communities have asked for assistance in evaluating the environmental and public health impacts, the president said. "If continued exposures to these toxic and radioactive wastes are not addressed, then the federal government could be looking at a whole new generation of RECA claimants." Kathy Helms – khelms@frontiernet.net [khelms@frontiernet.net] ***************************************************************** 32 PRAVDA.Ru: The US uses depleted uranium weapons in Iraq - [http://port.pravda.ru] 05/24/2004 13:06 Radiation level in Baghdad becomes life threatening The US Armed Forces increased their use of depleted uranium weapons in Iraq six times. This resulted in radioactive contamination of a number of regions in Baghdad. A well-known organization in the US entitled "International Action Center" reported last week that "in the course of the Iraqi war, the US has increased its use of weapons with depleted uranium from 375 tons, which were used> during the operation "Desert Storm" in 1991, to 2 200 tons." Currently, "Geiger counter indicates that radiation exceeds the norm by 1 000/2 000 times in several spots in the center of Baghdad," reads the organization's report. According to the International Action Center, half of 697 000 of American veterans of the "Desert Storm" operation and their children have been diagnosed with serious health conditions as a result of being exposed to depleted uranium weapons. However, for Iraq, "consequences will be more drastic", remarks the report. "This is a crime against Iraqi people and the world's population at large," reports RIA "Novosti". Read the original in Russian: (Translated by: Anna Ossipova) L1999-2002 "PRAVDA.Ru". When reproducing our materials in ***************************************************************** 33 Las Vegas SUN: Reid works on transportation bill SUN WASHINGTON BUREAU WASHINGTON -- Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., has been selected to help finalize a multibillion-dollar transportation bill that will guide Nevada highway and transit projects for the next six years. Major differences exist between the overall House and Senate versions of the transportation bill, passed earlier this year. Nevada stands to gain $1.62 billion in highway funds from the Senate's version of the bill, a 35.6 percent increase compared to the last allocation in 1998, while the House version of the bill contains $1.3 billion for the state, about $320 million less. "I'm looking forward to working with my colleagues in the House to finish the highway bill," Reid said in a statement issued after he was named to the conference committee that will work out the differences. "The Senate's version of this bill has $1.6 billion for Nevada transportation needs, including highway construction projects and the Hoover Dam Bypass. As a conferee I'll be able to keep a close eye on these projects while the final legislation is drafted, and help make sure Nevada gets the funding it needs and deserves." Reid sits on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which writes a portion of the bill in the Senate. The House has not named its members of the conference committee yet but is expected to do so after the weeklong Memorial Day recess, which starts today. ***************************************************************** 34 UPI: Energy Dept. announces nuke plant study - ( United Press International) May 24, 2004 Washington, DC, May. 24 (UPI) -- A detailed 10-month study of a proposed new-generation nuclear power reactor project in Alabama was launched Monday. The Energy Department said the study would help the Tennessee Valley Authority determine if it would feasible to build a commercial nuclear generating plant in the next decade on a site near Hollywood, Ala. The $4.25 million study will look at plans to build two Advance Boiling Water Reactors that would generate more than 2,600 megawatts of electricity. The design, which was certified in 1997, is in use in Japan. There are also ABWR units slated for Taiwan. The expansion of nuclear power has been touted by the Bush administration as a necessary step to increase U.S. electricity supplies without a corresponding increase in emissions of greenhouse gases, mercury and other pollutants. [UPI Perspectives] ***************************************************************** 35 Oak Ridger: State, ORNL project good idea Story last updated at 11:45 a.m. on May 24, 2004 DOE CHIEF: 'We're neighbors in ways we've not been neighbors before.' By: Paul Parson | Oak Ridger Staff paul.parson@oakridger.com [paul.parson@oakridger.com] The effort to construct three state-funded facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is a good example of "thinking outside the box," according to Tennessee's economic development chief. In fact, ORNL's joint institutes are launching a new era for the federal research facility, the University of Tennessee, the state and the Department of Energy. "Work hard, work together and work smart," said Matt Kisber, commissioner of Economic and Community Development, when describing the effort during a visit to ORNL Friday afternoon. Lynn Freeny/DOE Gerald Boyd, manager of the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge Operations office, spoke Friday during a dedication ceremony at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the new Joint Institute for Computational Sciences. Also pictured, from left, are Billy Stair, director of Communications and Community Outreach at ORNL; Thom Dunning, director of the Joint Institute; Jeff Wadsworth, ORNL's director; Matt Kisber, state commissioner for Economic and Community Development; and Joe Johnson, interim president of the University of Tennessee. However, Kisber said if all the state does is "provide funds for brick and mortar," then he's not sure the job is done. Kisber said Gov. Phil Bredesen wants to "maximize the potential" for this project and use it to "make a difference." Bredesen was supposed to visit ORNL Friday to tour the recently completed Joint Institute for Computational Sciences, but he had to cancel because the legislature was still in session and he was required to stay in Nashville. Owned by the state of Tennessee, ORNL's $10 million Joint Institute for Computational Sciences is located on land deeded by DOE. "We're neighbors in ways we've not been neighbors before," said Gerald Boyd, manager of DOE's Oak Ridge Operations office. The new 52,000-square-foot building will also improve access to the world's most powerful supercomputers for scientists, universities and businesses. Following a decision last week by DOE, ORNL is poised to be home to the world's fastest supercomputer. Thom Dunning, director of the Joint Institute for Computational Sciences, said the facility will be used by ORNL researchers and others to develop the software needed to take full advantages of the new computer and will use the new capabilities to solve some of the nation's most pressing scientific problems. For example, modern studies in biology, astrophysics, materials science, climatology and other fields rely on computational modeling and simulation. Computational modeling and simulation also impact many industrial areas, including automobile and airplane design, pharmaceuticals, pollution prevention and weather forecasting. The Joint Institute for Computational Sciences is one of three collaborations between ORNL and UT. The other two state-funded projects will be the Joint Institute for Neutron Sciences and the Joint Institute for Biological Sciences. ***************************************************************** 36 Las Vegas SUN: Nuclear experiment planned at Nevada Test Site ASSOCIATED PRESS LAS VEGAS (AP) - Government scientists plan to conduct an underground nuclear experiment Tuesday at the Nevada Test Site, the National Nuclear Security Administration said. The subcritical experiment, dubbed "Armando," will involve detonating high explosives around plutonium in a steel sphere while X-rays, radar and lasers chart the behavior of the radioactive element in a non-nuclear explosion. Scientists from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico are conducting the test in a tunnel 963 feet below ground at the Nevada Test Site, about 80 miles northwest of Las Vegas. "Armando" is the 21st subcritical experiment at the test site, and the third in a series. Its predecessors, "Mario" and "Rocco," were conducted in August and September 2002. Anti-nuclear groups criticize subcritical experiments as contrary to the spirit of the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty on nuclear arms. The U.S. has observed a nuclear testing moratorium since 1992, but has not ratified the treaty. Federal officials call subcritical experiments essential to maintaining the safety and reliability of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. The experiments technically do not violate the treaty because no critical mass is formed and there is no full-scale nuclear explosion. The Bush administration and Congress last year reduced from three years to two years the time it would take to resume full-scale nuclear tests. The last subcritical experiment, "Piano," was conducted Sept. 19, 2003, by scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California --- On the Net: National Nuclear Security Administration: http://www.nnsa.doe.gov [http://www.nnsa.doe.gov] Nevada Test Site: http://www.nv.doe.gov/nts [http://www.nv.doe.gov/nts] Los Alamos National Laboratory: http://www.lanl.gov [http://www.lanl.gov] -- ***************************************************************** 37 [du-list] June 3rd: Celebrate 23rd Anniversary of Peace Park Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:35:27 -0700 You're invited! Thursday, June 3rd, will be the 23rd anniversary of the founding of the Peace Park Antinuclear Vigil, which has stood outside the White House 24 hours a day since June 3, 1981. See http://prop1.org/parkcurr.htm Please come Thursday at 7 pm to Lafayette Park. Bring drums, banners, signs, fliers about your own peace work, and friends. At 7:30, walk or ride ten blocks from Peace Park to the Peace House (1233 12th Street NW) for potluck dinner. A vehicle will be available to transport people and food (call 202-682-4282 for more information or to volunteer). We really hope you will join us this year. We'll use this celebration as a time to strategize and network, as well as to remind folks that the vigil still continues, quietly, 24 hours a day, and legislation still exists calling for the global abolition of nuclear weapons and conversion of the war machines to provide for human needs. See http://prop1.org/prop1/ _______ALSO:_______ Sunday, MAY 30, 2004 - FREE the PEACE - Concert and speakout for Peace in Malcolm X (Meridian Hill) Park, noon to dark - endorsed by Black Voices for Peace, Community Coalition for Justice & Peace, DAWN, Malcolm X Drummers and Dancers, Poets Against the War, Proposition One Committee, and the Washington Peace Center (as of this posting). Spread the word! Ellen Thomas ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this groups send a message to du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com. In the body of the message type unsubscribe and send. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: du-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ***************************************************************** 38 Google News Alert - nuclear Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DEPARTMENT of Energy Announces Study of Advanced New Nuclear ... U.S. Newswire (press release) - Washington,DC,USA ... Valley Authority (TVA) to conduct a detailed study of the potential construction of a two- unit Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) nuclear plant on ... See all stories on this topic: AWARD Could Lead to Completion of Unfinished Bellefonte Nuclear ... WHNT - Huntsville,AL,USA ... agreed to award $2.1 million to a team of companies that includes the Tennessee Valley Authority to study the cost of constructing a two-unit nuclear plant at ... NUCLEAR Experiment Planned in Nevada Yahoo News - USA LAS VEGAS - Government scientists plan to conduct an underground nuclear experiment Tuesday at the Nevada Test Site, the National Nuclear Security ... See all stories on this topic: GAIA guru in push for nuclear power The Australian - Australia ONLY nuclear energy can slow down the rapid and potentially devastating warming of the earth, a veteran British scientist and environmental campaigner argued ... See all stories on this topic: NIGERIA says seeking nuclear power, not weapons Times of India - India LAGOS: Nigeria wants to develop atomic power to boost economic development, but the African oil exporter has never sought nuclear weapons, a top official said. ... See all stories on this topic: RUSKO Wants to Complete Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant Slovakia Daily Surveyor - Bratislava,Slovakia Economy Minister Pavol Rusko said on Austrian radio at the weekend that Slovakia will press ahead with completion of the Mochovce nuclear power station. ... See all stories on this topic: NUCLEAR security efforts lacking, scientists report Chicago Tribune (subscription) - Chicago,IL,USA ... His audience--leaders of the government's nuclear laboratories--said yes. ... They warn that a nuclear weapon could be bought or stolen in an unstable country. ... See all stories on this topic: CASE Reveals Nuts and Bolts of Nuclear Network, Officials Say Los Angeles Times (subscription) - Los Angeles,CA,USA By Josh Meyer, Times Staff Writer. ROCKVILLE, Md. — As they race to dismantle a global black market in nuclear weapons components, US authorities are focusing ... See all stories on this topic: N. Korea Will Continue Developing Nuclear Weapons, UN Envoy Says Chosun Ilbo - South Korea A UN envoy to North Korea says the country's officials have told him they intend to continue developing nuclear weapons programs. ... See all stories on this topic: ISRAELI Nuclear Spy Appears in Court Guardian - UK TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) - Mordechai Vanunu, who served 18 years in prison for revealing Israel's nuclear secrets, appeared in court in a libel suit Monday, his ... See all stories on this topic: This daily-once News Alert is brought to you by Google News (BETA)... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Remove this News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts/remove?s=92d1672a1b037a07&hl=en Create another News Alert: http://www.google.com/newsalerts?hl=en Try Google News: http://news.google.com/ ***************************************************************** NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: *****************************************************************