U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center Event Reports For 07/13/95 - 07/14/95 ** EVENT NUMBERS ** 28943 29056 29057 29058 29059 29060 29061 29062 !!!!!!!!! THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN RETRACTED !!!!!!! +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |POWER REACTOR | |EVENT NUMBER: 28943 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |FACILITY: WATERFORD REGION: 4 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 06/14/95 | |UNIT: [3] [ ] [ ] STATE: LA |NOTIFICATION TIME: 17:11 [ET]| |RX TYPE: [3] CE |EVENT DATE: 06/14/95 | +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 13:20[CDT]| |NRC NOTIFIED BY: A WEMETT |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOHN MacKINNON +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+ NOTIFICATIONS | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE +-----------------------------+ |10 CFR SECTION: |CHRIS VANDENBURGH RDO | |ADAS 50.72(b)(2)(i) DEG/UNANALYZED COND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+--------------+--+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | 3 | N N 0 COLD SHUTDOWN | 0 COLD SHUTDOWN | | | | | | | | | +-----+---------------------------------------------+--------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | CVCS LETDOWN CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES (INSIDE AND OUTSIDE) DID NOT | | OPERATE PROPERLY WHEN THEY WERE TAKEN TO THEIR CLOSED POSITION. | | | | WHILE ESTABLISHING TEST CONDITIONS TO PERFORM COLD SHUTDOWN SURVEILLANCE | | TESTING THE FOLLOWING VALVES FAILED TO STROKE AS REQUIRED. CHEMICAL VOLUME | | AND CONTROL VALVE CVC-103 (LETDOWN INSIDE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE) | | CLOSED SLOWLY, AND VALVE CVC-109 (LETDOWN OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION | | VALVE) FAILED TO CLOSE (VALVE CLOSED WHEN ITS SOLENOID OPERATOR WAS | | TAPPED). THESE VALVES ARE ISOLATION VALVES FOR A COMMON PENETRATION. THE | | UNIT IS NOT IN ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT SINCE IT IS IN | | COLD SHUTDOWN. THE LICENSEE WILL BE INVESTIGATING THIS PROBLEM. THE | | PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE VALVES WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE UNIT | | STARTUP. | | | | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR WAS INFORMED OF THIS EVENT BY THE LICENSEE. | | | | *** RETRACTION 17:43 7/13/95 FROM SCOTT TAKEN BY SEBROSKY *** | | | | THE LICENSEE IS RETRACTING THIS EVENT. BASED ON FURTHER INVESTIGATION, THE | | LICENSEE HAS DETERMINED THAT THE EVENT DID NOT MEET REPORTABILITY | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | PER SINGLE FAILURE CRITERIA, ONLY ONE OF THE LETDOWN CONTAINMENT ISOLATION | | VALVES IS REQUIRED TO CLOSE DURING ACCIDENT CONDITIONS TO LIMIT OFF-SITE | | DOSES AT OR BELOW 10 CFR PART 100 LIMITS. DURING THIS EVENT, THE LETDOWN | | INSIDE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE CLOSED SLUGGISHLY BUT WITHIN 30 SECONDS | | OF THE INITIAL ATTEMPT TO CLOSE IT. THE CLOSURE TIME FOR VALVE CVC-103 AS | | LISTED IN FSAR TABLE 6.2-32 IS 10 SECONDS. THIS CLOSURE TIME IS TO SATISFY | | THE PROVISIONS OF ASME SECTION XI, RULES FOR IN-SERVICE TESTING OF VALVES | | IN NUCLEAR PLANTS. | | | | AS STATED IN FSAR SECTION 6.2.4.2.4, ITEM I, THE CLOSURE TIMES OF THE | | CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVELY SELECTED. THAT IS, | | THERE IS NO DIRECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE CLOSURE | | TIME AND THE CAPABILITY OF THE PLANT TO LIMIT OFF-SITE DOSE TO 10 CFR PART | | 100 LIMITS AND A FRACTION THEREOF. A REVIEW OF THE CVC-103 CLOSURE TIME | | (30 SECONDS) BY THE LICENSEE'S SAFETY AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS GROUP HAS | | DETERMINED THAT THIS CLOSURE TIME IS SUFFICIENT TO LIMIT OFF-SITE DOSE TO | | 10 CFR PART 100 LIMITS AND FRACTIONS THEREOF, AND ACCORDINGLY, PLANT SAFETY | | WAS NOT COMPROMISED. | | | | THE LICENSEE WILL INFORM THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. THE HOO NOTIFIED THE R4DO | | (MURRAY). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |HOSPITAL | |EVENT NUMBER: 29056 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |LICENSEE: CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | | CITY: CLEVELAND REGION: 3 |NOTIFICATION TIME: 11:59 [ET]| | COUNTY: STATE: OH |EVENT DATE: 07/12/95 | |LICENSE#: 3400466-01 AGREEMENT: N |EVENT TIME: 06:30[EDT]| | DOCKET: |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | | +-----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION| | |MARTIN FARBER RDO | | | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |NRC NOTIFIED BY: JUDY McKENNA | | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |LADM 35.33(a) MED MISADMINISTRATION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, OF CLEVELAND, OHIO, CALLED TO REPORT A | | MEDICAL MISADMINISTRATION. | | | | THE MISADMINISTRATION WAS DUE TO AN SURGICAL IMPLANT BECOMING DISLODGED. | | THE IMPLANT CONSISTED OF TWO CS-137 SOURCES WHOSE STRENGTHS WERE 18.5 AND | | 14.7 MILLIGRAM EQUIVALENT RADIUM RESPECTIVELY. THE SOURCES WERE IMPLANTED | | AT 15:00 ON 7/10/95 AND WERE SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED AT 15:00 ON 7/13/95. | | ON THE MORNING OF 7/12/95 AT APPROXIMATELY 06:30, THE PATIENT INDICATED | | THAT SHE FELT SOMETHING FALL OUT. UPON INSPECTION BY A NURSE, IT WAS | | DETERMINED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD FALLEN OUT OF HER BODY AND WAS RESTING NEAR | | HER LEG. THE IMPLANT WAS LAST VERIFIED TO BE IN PLACE AT APPROXIMATELY | | 00:30 ON 7/12/95. THE LICENSEE BELIEVES THAT THE SUTURES THAT HELD THE | | IMPLANT IN PLACE BROKE CAUSING THE SOURCES TO MOVE. | | | | THERE ARE NO ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS EXPECTED TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT | | HAS BEEN INFORMED. THE LICENSEE PLANS ON MAKING UP THE DOSE TO THE PATIENT | | BY THE USE OF A HIGH DOSE RATE AFTER-LOADER TREATMENT. THE LICENSEE IS | | CURRENTLY ESTIMATING THE DOSE TO THE AREA OF THE BODY WERE THE IMPLANT WAS | | DISCOVERED. IF THE IMPLANT HAD STAYED IN ITS SCHEDULED TIME, THE PART OF | | THE BODY WHERE THE SOURCES WERE FOUND WOULD HAVE RECEIVED 56 CENTIGRAY. THE | | LICENSEE'S PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE, DEPENDING ON WHEN THE SOURCE WAS | | DISLODGED, IS IN THE RANGE OF 28 TO 37 CENTIGRAY. | | | | THE LICENSEE HAS DISCUSSED THIS EVENT WITH REGION III (WIEDEMAN). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |POWER REACTOR | |EVENT NUMBER: 29057 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |FACILITY: BRUNSWICK REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | |UNIT: [1] [ ] [ ] STATE: NC |NOTIFICATION TIME: 12:52 [ET]| |RX TYPE: [1] GE-4,[2] GE-4 |EVENT DATE: 07/13/95 | +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 11:58[EDT]| |NRC NOTIFIED BY: JOHN REINSBURROW |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+ NOTIFICATIONS | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE +-----------------------------+ |10 CFR SECTION: |WILLIAM RANKIN RDO | |ACCS 50.72(b)(1)(iv) ECCS INJECTION | | |ARPS 50.72(b)(2)(ii) RPS ACTUATION | | |AESF 50.72(b)(2)(ii) ESF ACTUATION | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+--------------+--+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | 1 | A/R Y 100 POWER OPERATION | 0 HOT SHUTDOWN | | | | | | | | | +-----+---------------------------------------------+--------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAM FROM 100 PERCENT POWER. | | | | AT 11:58, UNIT 1 SCRAMMED FROM 100 PERCENT POWER FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. THE | | LICENSEE ALSO RECEIVED GROUP 1, 2, 3, 6, AND 8 ISOLATION SIGNALS. IN | | ADDITION, A REACTOR BUILDING ISOLATION AND STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM | | AUTOMATIC START SIGNALS WERE RECEIVED. PRESSURE CONTROL IMMEDIATELY AFTER | | THE SCRAM WAS WITH THE SAFETY RELIEF VALVES (SRV), AND LEVEL WAS BEING | | CONTROLLED BY THE HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT (HPCI) AND REACTOR CORE ISOLATION | | COOLING (RCIC) SYSTEMS. | | | | ALL RODS INSERTED, AND ALL ELECTRICAL BUSSES TRANSFERRED AS EXPECTED. THE | | LICENSEE IS CURRENTLY USING THE HPCI SYSTEM IN THE PRESSURE CONTROL MODE TO | | REMOVE DECAY HEAT WITH REACTOR VESSEL WATER LEVEL BEING MAINTAINED BY THE | | CONTROL ROD DRIVE SYSTEM AND THE RCIC SYSTEM. THE RHR SYSTEM IS BEING USED | | IN THE SUPPRESSION POOL COOLING MODE TO REMOVE THE HEAT FROM THE | | SUPPRESSION POOL. ALL ECCS SYSTEMS ARE OPERABLE. | | | | THE CAUSE OF THE SCRAM IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION. AT THIS TIME, THE | | LICENSEE BELIEVES THAT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN A PROBLEM WITH THE EHC SYSTEM, | | AND FOR THIS REASON, THE LICENSEE IS NOT CURRENTLY USING THE MAIN CONDENSER | | AS A HEAT SINK. HPCI AND RCIC BOTH RECEIVED AN AUTOMATIC INJECTION SIGNAL | | DUE TO LEVEL REACHING THE LEVEL 2 SETPOINT FROM SHRINK AFTER THE SCRAM. | | HOWEVER, BEFORE THE HPCI VALVES COULD RE-ALIGN THE SIGNAL HAD CLEARED. THE | | LICENSEE DECIDED TO MANUALLY ALIGN THE HPCI VALVES TO INJECT INTO THE | | REACTOR TO HELP RESTORE WATER LEVEL. RCIC AUTOMATICALLY STARTED AND | | AUTOMATICALLY INITIATED WITHOUT OPERATOR ACTION. | | | | THE LICENSEE IS ALSO INVESTIGATING WHY A VALVE THAT SHOULD HAVE CLOSED DID | | NOT. OPERATORS NOTED AFTER THE SCRAM THAT VALVE 1-CAC-SV-1215E (IN THE | | RETURN LINE TO THE DRYWELL FOR THE HYDROGEN/OXYGEN ANALYZER) SHOWED DUAL | | INDICATION. A VALVE IN THIS SAME LINE DID CLOSE PROPERLY, AND WHEN | | OPERATORS TOOK THE SWITCH TO CLOSE FOR THIS VALVE IN THE CONTROL ROOM, THE | | VALVE REALIGNED AND CLOSED. | | | | THE LICENSEE HAS INFORMED THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | | | *** UPDATE @ 15:33 7/13/95 FROM REINSBURROW TAKEN BY SEBROSKY *** | | | | THE LICENSEE CALLED TO REPORT THAT IN ADDITION TO BEING A ONE-HOUR REPORT, | | THE SCRAM THAT OCCURRED ALSO MET THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A FOUR-HOUR | | REPORT FOR AN RPS AND ESF ACTUATION. | | | | THE LICENSEE IS STILL INVESTIGATING THE CAUSE OF THE SCRAM. THE MSIVs | | REMAIN CLOSED BECAUSE THE LICENSEE IS STILL UNSURE AT THIS TIME IF THERE IS | | A PROBLEM WITH THE EHC SYSTEM WHICH WOULD EFFECT BYPASS VALVE OPERATION. | | AT APPROXIMATELY 14:34 AFTER AN SRV HAD BEEN CYCLED TO REDUCE PRESSURE, THE | | LICENSEE RECEIVED ANOTHER AUTOMATIC SCRAM SIGNAL DUE TO LEVEL SPIKING LOW. | | THIS CAUSED GROUP 2 (DRYWELL FLOOR AND EQUIPMENT DRAINS), 6 (CONTAINMENT | | ATMOSPHERE MONITORING AND CONTROL), AND 8 (SHUTDOWN COOLING) ISOLATION | | SIGNALS. THE GROUP 2 AND 6 VALVES REPOSITIONED DUE TO THE SIGNAL; HOWEVER, | | THE GROUP 8 VALVES DID NOT REPOSITION BECAUSE THEY WERE SHUT PRIOR TO THE | | SIGNAL. THE SCRAM SIGNAL AND ISOLATION SIGNAL HAS BEEN RESET. THE CURRENT | | REACTOR PRESSURE IS 627 PSIG WITH HPCI MAINTAINING PRESSURE AND WITH RCIC | | AND THE CRD SYSTEM MAINTAINING LEVEL. | | | | THE LICENSEE HAS INFORMED THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. THE HOO NOTIFIED THE | | R2DO (RANKIN). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |POWER REACTOR | |EVENT NUMBER: 29058 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |FACILITY: POINT BEACH REGION: 3 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | |UNIT: [1] [2] [ ] STATE: WI |NOTIFICATION TIME: 15:15 [ET]| |RX TYPE: [1] W-2-LP,[2] W-2-LP |EVENT DATE: 07/13/95 | +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 13:49[CDT]| |NRC NOTIFIED BY: MIKE KUETHER |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+ NOTIFICATIONS | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE +-----------------------------+ |10 CFR SECTION: |MARTIN FARBER RDO | |DDDD 73.71 UNSPECIFIED PARAGRAPH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+--------------+--+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | 1 | N Y 99 POWER OPERATION | 99 POWER OPERATION | | 2 | N Y 100 POWER OPERATION | 100 POWER OPERATION | | | | | +-----+---------------------------------------------+--------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | A SECURITY DEGRADATION OCCURRED FOR APPROXIMATELY 23 MINUTES. COMPENSATORY | | ACTION WAS TAKEN IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. SEE HOO LOG FOR DETAILS. | | | | THE LICENSEE HAS INFORMED THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |GENERAL INFORMATION or OTHER | |EVENT NUMBER: 29059 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |LICENSEE: SYNCOR INTERNATIONAL |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | | CITY: KANSAS CITY REGION: 0 |NOTIFICATION TIME: 15:28 [ET]| | COUNTY: STATE: |EVENT DATE: 07/12/95 | |LICENSE#: 24-16617-01MD AGREEMENT: |EVENT TIME: 18:00[CDT]| | DOCKET: |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | | +-----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION| | |MARTIN FARBER RDO | | | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |NRC NOTIFIED BY: TARA DOMITER | | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |IBBE 30.50(b)(2)(i) ACCID MIT EQUIP FAILS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | SYNCOR INTERNATIONAL, OF CHATWORTH, CALIFORNIA, CALLED TO REPORT THE | | FAILURE OF A FUME HOOD AT ITS KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, FACILITY. | | | | AT APPROXIMATELY 18:00 ON 7/12/95, THE KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, FACILITY LOST | | POWER RESULTING IN THE LOSS OF OPERATION OF THE FUME HOOD. AT | | APPROXIMATELY 21:30, IT WAS NOTED THAT POWER WAS RESTORED TO THE FACILITY. | | (THE EXACT TIME THE POWER WAS RESTORED IS UNKNOWN). | | | | THE FUME HOOD CONTAINED 176 MILLICURIES OF XE-133 AND 727 MILLICURIES OF | | I-131 AT THE TIME OF THE LOSS OF POWER. THE I-131 MONITORING EQUIPMENT | | USED TO MONITOR OPERATION OF THE FUME HOOD ALSO LOST POWER. PRIOR TO THE | | LOSS OF POWER AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE RESTORATION OF POWER, THE | | MONITORING EQUIPMENT SHOWED NO ABNORMALITIES WITH THE OPERATION OF THE FUME | | HOOD. THE LICENSEE IS CONTINUING TO INVESTIGATE, BUT AT THIS TIME, THE | | LICENSEE BELIEVES THAT NO RELEASES OCCURRED WHICH WOULD HAVE EXCEEDED | | REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |GENERAL INFORMATION or OTHER | |EVENT NUMBER: 29060 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |LICENSEE: LIMITORQUE CORPORATION |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | | CITY: LYNCHBURG REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION TIME: 16:30 [ET]| | COUNTY: STATE: VA |EVENT DATE: 07/13/95 | |LICENSE#: AGREEMENT: N |EVENT TIME: 00:00[EDT]| | DOCKET: |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | | +-----------------------------+ | |PERSON ORGANIZATION| | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |NRC NOTIFIED BY: CHARLES HYLTON |VERN HODGE NRR | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY | | +------------------------------------------------+ | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE | | |10 CFR SECTION: | | |CCCC 21.21 UNSPECIFIED PARAGRAPH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR PART 21, LIMITORQUE CORPORATION OF LYNCHBURG, VA, | | REPORTED A POTENTIAL DEFECT IN SMB/SB/SBD-00 MOTOR-OPERATED VALVE | | ACTUATORS. | | | | LIMITORQUE DISCOVERED, THROUGH A NOTIFICATION FROM THE TENNESSEE VALLEY | | AUTHORITY, THE POSSIBILITY OF THE OUTSIDE CLUTCH TRIPPER BECOMING WEDGED | | AGAINST THE ACTUATOR HOUSING AND PREVENTING THE ACTUATOR FROM SHIFTING TO | | ELECTRICAL FROM MANUAL OPERATION WHEN THE MOTOR IS ENERGIZED. LIMITORQUE | | CONTENDS THAT THIS CONDITION COULD BE REPORTABLE DEPENDING ON THE OPERATING | | PRACTICES OF THE LICENSEES. SPECIFICALLY, | | | | - A REPORTABLE CONDITION DOES NOT EXIST IF THE INDIVIDUAL LICENSEE'S | | PRACTICES ENSURE ACTUATOR ELECTRICAL (MOTOR) OPERATION VERIFICATION AFTER | | BEING IN THE MANUAL (HAND WHEEL) MODE. | | | | - THE POTENTIAL FOR A REPORTABLE CONDITION EXISTS IF THE INDIVIDUAL | | LICENSEE'S PRACTICES DO NOT ENSURE ACTUATOR (MOTOR) OPERATION VERIFICATION | | AFTER BEING IN THE MANUAL (HAND WHEEL) MODE. | | | | LIMITORQUE'S INVESTIGATION OF THE CONDITION SHOWS THAT SMB/SB/SBD-00 | | HOUSINGS HAVING A CAST DATE OF 1979 OR EARLIER MAY HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR | | THIS WEDGING, AND INSTALLATION OF A 'TRIPPER STOP' WILL PREVENT THE | | PROBLEM. SMB/SB/SBD-00 HOUSINGS HAVING A CAST DATE OF 1980 OR LATER WILL | | NOT HAVE THE POTENTIAL FOR THE PROBLEM. | | | | LIMITORQUE IS IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING A WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE | | AFFECTED NUCLEAR UTILITIES OF THE PROBLEM. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |POWER REACTOR | |EVENT NUMBER: 29061 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |FACILITY: CATAWBA REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | |UNIT: [1] [2] [ ] STATE: SC |NOTIFICATION TIME: 17:59 [ET]| |RX TYPE: [1] W-4-LP,[2] W-4-LP |EVENT DATE: 07/13/95 | +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 15:40[EDT]| |NRC NOTIFIED BY: RONDA BAIN |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+ NOTIFICATIONS | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE +-----------------------------+ |10 CFR SECTION: |WILLIAM RANKIN RDO | |NINF INFORMATION ONLY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+--------------+--+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | 1 | N Y 100 POWER OPERATION | 100 POWER OPERATION | | 2 | N Y 100 POWER OPERATION | 100 POWER OPERATION | | | | | +-----+---------------------------------------------+--------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | THE LICENSEE MADE A COURTESY CALL DUE TO THE POTENTIAL FOR A NEWS RELEASE | | CONCERNING AN ALTERCATION THAT OCCURRED WITHIN THE OWNER CONTROLLED AREA. | | | | AT APPROXIMATELY 15:40, A CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN NOTICED AN ALTERCATION | | BETWEEN 2 PEOPLE AT A DUKE POWER COMPANY EMPLOYEE'S PARK LOCATED WITHIN THE | | OWNER CONTROLLED AREA. THE PARK IS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE PROTECTED AREA AND | | IS USED FOR DUKE POWER COMPANY EMPLOYEES AND THEIR DEPENDENTS. THE PARK | | HAS A COMBINATION LOCK ON THE GATE ACCESS AREA TO PREVENT USE BY THE | | GENERAL PUBLIC. THE CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN NOTIFIED SITE SECURITY WHO | | DISPATCHED SOME GUARDS TO THE AREA. | | | | WHEN THE GUARDS ARRIVED, THEY FOUND FOUR INDIVIDUALS, TWO OF WHICH HAD BEEN | | INVOLVED IN A FIST FIGHT. ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DOVE INTO THE LAKE AND | | SWAM OVER TO THE INTAKE STRUCTURE FOR THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM IN AN | | ATTEMPT TO AVOID THE GUARDS. THE GUARDS WERE ABLE TO APPREHEND THE | | INDIVIDUAL FROM THE INTAKE STRUCTURE, AND THIS INDIVIDUAL IS IN THE CUSTODY | | OF THE YORK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT. NONE OF THE FOUR INDIVIDUALS WORKED | | FOR DUKE POWER ALTHOUGH ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DOES HAVE A STEPFATHER THAT | | WORKS FOR THE UTILITY. THE AGES OF THE INDIVIDUALS RANGED FROM 15 TO 23. A | | FEMALE IN THE GROUP WAS ALSO TURNED OVER TO THE YORK COUNTY POLICE | | DEPARTMENT AND IS IN THEIR CUSTODY. THE OTHER TWO INDIVIDUALS WERE | | RELEASED. | | | | THE LICENSEE HAS SURVEYED THE AREA WHERE THE INDIVIDUALS WERE AND FOUND NO | | EVIDENCE OR DAMAGE OR SABOTAGE. THE LICENSEE HAS INFORMED THE RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR AND MAY ISSUE A PRESS RELEASE. | | | | THE LICENSEE INFORMED THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | | | *** UPDATE @ 21:56 7/13/95 FROM BRISSON TAKEN BY SEBROSKY *** | | | | THE LICENSEE DOES NOT PLAN TO ISSUE A PRESS RELEASE; HOWEVER, THE LOCAL | | MEDIA IN THE AREA SEEMS TO BE INTERESTED IN THE DISTURBANCE. THE HOO | | NOTIFIED THE R2DO (RANKIN). | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ |POWER REACTOR | |EVENT NUMBER: 29062 | +----------------------------------+ +-----------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+-----------------------------+ |FACILITY: CRYSTAL RIVER REGION: 2 |NOTIFICATION DATE: 07/13/95 | |UNIT: [3] [ ] [ ] STATE: FL |NOTIFICATION TIME: 18:35 [ET]| |RX TYPE: [3] B&W-L-LP |EVENT DATE: 07/13/95 | +------------------------------------------------+EVENT TIME: 18:02[EDT]| |NRC NOTIFIED BY: RICHARD SWEENEY |LAST UPDATE DATE: 07/13/95 | |HQ OPS OFFICER: JOSEPH SEBROSKY +-----------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------+ NOTIFICATIONS | |EMERGENCY CLASS: NOT APPLICABLE +-----------------------------+ |10 CFR SECTION: |WILLIAM RANKIN RDO | |AOUT 50.72(b)(1)(ii)(B) OUTSIDE DESIGN BASIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +-----+----------+-------+--------+--------------+--+--------+-----------------+ |UNIT |SCRAM CODE|RX CRIT|INIT PWR| INIT RX MODE |CURR PWR| CURR RX MODE | +-----+----------+-------+--------+-----------------+--------+-----------------+ | 3 | N Y 100 POWER OPERATION | 100 POWER OPERATION | | | | | | | | | +-----+---------------------------------------------+--------------------------+ EVENT TEXT +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | THE SHELL SIDE OF THE DECAY HEAT SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGERS MAY NOT HAVE | | ADEQUATE OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION. | | | | DURING A SYSTEM WALKDOWN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SHELL SIDE OF THE DECAY | | HEAT SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGERS DO NOT HAVE OVER PRESSURE PROTECTION IF THE | | COOLING WATER SUPPLY IS ISOLATED. THE LICENSEE DOES NOT CONSIDER THE | | PROBLEM TO BE AN OPERABILITY ISSUE AT THIS TIME SINCE THE COOLING WATER IS | | REQUIRED IN ORDER TO CONSIDER THE HEAT EXCHANGERS OPERABLE. THE LICENSEE | | IS IN THE PROCESS OF PLACING ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS ON THE HEAT EXCHANGER | | COOLING WATER ISOLATION VALVES AND IS EVALUATING PRESSURE VESSEL CODE | | CONFORMANCE. | | | | THE SYSTEM WALKDOWN WAS BEING DONE WITH NRC INSPECTORS WHO ARE ONSITE | | PERFORMING A SERVICE WATER INSPECTION. THE LICENSEE HAS NOT DECLARED ANY | | SYSTEM INOPERABLE AND IS NOT IN ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION | | STATEMENT BECAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. | | | | THE LICENSEE WILL INFORM THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+