Headquarters Daily Report SEPTEMBER 03, 1998 *************************************************************************** REPORT NEGATIVE NO INPUT ATTACHED INPUT RECEIVED RECEIVED HEADQUARTERS û REGION I û REGION II û REGION III û REGION IV û PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - HEADQUARTERS SEP. 03, 1998 Licensee/Facility: Notification: Part 21 Database MR Number: H-98-0137 Abb-Ce Date: 09/03/98 Subject: PART 21 - INCONSISTENT SCREENING OF MOST LIMITING FUEL ASSEMBLY Discussion: VENDOR: ABB-CE PT21 FILE NO: 98-60-0 DATE OF DOCUMENT: 08/13/98 ACCESSION NUMBER: SOURCE DOCUMENT: EN 34639 REVIEWER: PECB, E. Goodwin NEW ISSUE. The fuel vendor ABB Combustion Engineering reports its conclusion that under very flat core and assembly power distributions, its current screening methodology may not consistently identify the most limiting fuel assembly for detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic safety analyses. The vendor evaluated this defect for its current analyses of record for ANO 2, Calvert Cliffs 1 and 2, Palo Verde 1, 2, and 3, San Onofre 2 and 3, St. Lucie 2, Waterford 3, and Ft. Calhoun. The vendor notified other ABB-CE designed plants for which it is not involved in nuclear fuel safety analysis: Millstone 2, Maine Yankee (shutdown), Palisades, and St. Lucie 1. ABB has already completed reviews of the plants for which it did the analysis of record and determined that the deficiency led to results that either did not effect the validity of the exisiting analysis or could be absorbed within existing margin. In the case of San Onofre, ABB did recommend changes to setpoints to preserve adequate levels of margin. Those plants with CE fuel who do not use ABB-CE to do their analysis have been informed of the deficiency and have been given directions on how to conduct their own reviews. ABB stated that the reported defect in the screening methodology will be corrected within sixty days. The NRC staff, having reviewed the material submitted by ABB, sees no need for additional agency action. _