Headquarters Daily report APRIL 08, 1994 *************************************************************************** REPORT NEGATIVE NO INPUT ATTACHED INPUT RECEIVED RECEIVED HEADQUARTERS X REGION I X REGION II X REGION III X REGION IV X *************************************************************************** PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED MORNING REPORT - REGION APRIL 8, 1994 MR Number: H-94-0034 NRR DAILY REPORT ITEM SIGNIFICANT EVENTS EVENTS ASSESSMENT BRANCH DIVISION OF OPERATING REACTOR SUPPORT Subject: INCORRECT CONTAINMENT EMERGENCY SUMP SCREEN CONFIGURATION The NRR/AEOD Events Assessment Panel on March 22, 1994, classified the containment emergency sump screen integrity issues at Arkansas Nuclear One as a Significant Event for the NRC Performance Indicator Program. On October 1, 1993, personnel at Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Unit 1, found several breaches in the integrity of the reactor building sump. These breaches consisted of 22 semicircular holes (6" x 3" scuppers) at the base of the sump curb; four conduit penetrations in the sump screen; a small conduit penetration in the sump curb; two defects in the screen mesh covering the sump, one L-shaped cut and one straight cut; and several reactor building drain headers that lacked protective screen material. On October 22, 1993, seven holes approximately 1" x 3" were found in the grout in the Unit 2 containment sump curb. Although these containment sumps had been inspected on several occasions, the breaches of the sump screens and curbs and lack of reactor building drain header screens had gone unnoticed. The licensee had focused its inspections on debris and did not question the existence of penetrations through the screen and curb. In Unit 1, the scuppers were part of the original design and, while shown on plant drawings, the drawings were unclear with respect to screen installation. In Unit 2, the holes in the grout at the base of the containment sump curb were not identified in the design nor on drawings. These holes in Unit 2 were only visible after close examination because of the construction of the sump curb. The penetrations in the curb and cuts in the screen were not recognized as a problem until an electrician questioned the existence of the penetrations while working in the Unit 1 containment. On December 3, 1993, the NRC issued Information Notice 89-77, Supplement 1, "Debris in Containment Emergency Sumps and Incorrect Screen Configurations," to inform licensees of the problems at ANO. On December 14, 1993, the NRC issued a Severity Level III Notice of Violation for failure to assure that the reactor building sump screens were designed, installed, and maintained in accordance with design specifications described in the Final Safety Analysis Reports. No civil penalty was proposed due to mitigative factors, i.e., self-identification of the problem, prompt and comprehensive corrective actions, and past evidence of good performance in identifying and correcting problems. Based on preliminary information from the licensee and screening values from the Accident Sequence Precursor (ASP) models for human error probabilities, the increase in core damage frequency (CDF) is estimated to be approximately 7 x 10-5/year for Unit 1, and 2 x 10-5/year for Unit 2. The Unit 1 estimation assumes that the presence of holes in the sump screens and curb would lead to plugging the decay heat removal (DHR) heat exchanger outlet valves, which, the licensee reports, have a restrictive labyrinth flow path. This assumes that other available pathways would not become plugged, due to more favorable flow path internal geometry, and that the DHR pumps would not be damaged by passage of insulation, or by deadheading when their discharge paths became plugged. Although the inadequate sump screening condition has existed for an extended period, fibrous insulation has been present in the reactor building only since May 1992. Therefore the total probability of core damage for the applicable period would be about 1 x 10-4. The Unit 2 estimation assumes that the presence of the holes in the containment sump curb would result in a failure rate of 0.05 for each high pressure injection pump due to ingestion of debris during the recirculation mode for all loss of coolant accidents. The inadequate sump screening condition has apparently existed since the reactor entered commercial service about 15 years ago. Therefore, the total incremental risk of core damage over that period is about 3 x 10-4. CONTACT: Eric J. Benner, NRR/DORS/OEAB (301) 504-1171