PG&E and allies spend big bucks to fight public power | October 3, 2001 | SFBG News By Rachel Brahinsky Pacific Gas and Electric has so far spent a staggering $597,413 against the public power campaigns in San Francisco and Brisbane, according to statements filed at the Department of Elections last week. Nearly half of those funds, $254,409, was spent between July 1 and Sept. 22. Another $100,000 has been donated to the effort by AT. But public power proponents, anticipating the financial onslaught, have marshaled hundreds of volunteer hours – for posting window signs and educating voters – in a huge grassroots effort to create a publicly managed power agency. PG's financial reporting was made by the Coalition for Affordable Public Services (CAPS), which paid for push polls, consultants, and campaign literature. This month the beleaguered utility is expected to launch an expensive and aggressive media blitz, even though it has filed for bankruptcy protection. It was PG's shaky finances and the continued threat of blackouts that prompted a groundswell of support for two Nov. 6 ballots measures: Proposition F (the municipal water and power authority) and Measure I (the municipal utility district). AT's $100,000 went to a committee called No on I, the Coalition to Stop the Billion Dollar Bill. That committee is managed by Nathan Nayman of the Committee on Jobs. Public power advocates have a smaller war chest. Campaign filings show that MUD Now, the lead campaign committee for Measure I, spent $17,139 during August and September, bringing the committee's total for the two-year campaign to $109,634, about one-sixth of PG's spending. The majority of the contributions have come from the Bay Guardian in the form of donated ad space. Public power campaign tacticians say their most potent weapon will be the face-to-face contact volunteers have with potential voters. Still, they are sure to face a slick, well-financed campaign. "Hundreds of thousands of dollars [have been raised against us], and yet this is before the anti campaign has even intensified," Ross Mirkarimi, director of the consolidated solar and public power campaign, told the Bay Guardian. "Theirs is going to be a blitzkrieg of major proportions." Recently, paid staffers of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 1245 (the union that represents PG's employees) and representatives from the Communications Workers of America (CWA) have joined the cadre of lobbyists fighting public power. Nearly all of the lobbyists work for Solem and Associates, a longtime PG lobbying firm. Also, the lobbying firm Barnes Mosher Whitehurst is back in the fray. BMW worked for CAPS last year; now it is consulting for Nayman's group. And there's Jim Ross, a former Solem employee, who still declines to tell the Bay Guardian who he's working for. But at public events in the past, he said he represented the local garbage monopoly; more recently he has said he represents Pacific Bell and AT. Meanwhile, the county Local Agency Formation Commission voted Sept. 28 to officially cancel the contract for a public power sphere of influence study signed in July with utility consultant E.J. Simpson (see "LAFCO Beefs Up Public Power Feasibility Report," 9/26/01). The commission agreed to review other options for publishing a study in the coming weeks and discussed the possibility of holding a hearing with expert witnesses before the November election. P.S. Ralph Nader's rally in support of the public and solar campaigns has been moved to the Masonic Auditorium. Speakers are to be announced. Thurs/11, 7:30 p.m., 1111 California, S.F. $15 suggested donation. (415) 864-6078. For more information go to [http://www.democracyrising.org] . For more information on the public power campaign go to [http://www.sfbmud.org] . E-mail Rachel Brahinsky at [rachel@sfbg.com] . [http://www.sfbg.com/searchit.html]